Differential effects of carvedilol and atenolol on plasma noradrenaline during exercise in humans

Exploring Sex Differences of Beta-Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

In the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, early recognition and adequate treatment of hypertension are of leading importance. However, the efficacy of antihypertensives may be depending on sex disparities. Our objective was to evaluate and quantify the sex-diverse effects of beta-blockers (BB) on hypertension and cardiac function. We focussed on comparing hypertensive female versus male individuals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search was performed for studies on BBs from inception to May 2020. A total of 66 studies were included that contained baseline and follow up measurements on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and cardiac function. Data also had to be stratified for sex. Mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model. In females as compared to males, BB treatment decreased systolic BP 11.1 mmHg (95% CI, -14.5; -7.8) vs. 11.1 mmHg (95% CI, -14.0; -8.2), diastolic BP 8.0 mmHg (95% CI, -10.6; -5.3) vs. 8.0 mmHg (95% CI, -10.1; -6.0), and HR 10.8 beats per minute (bpm) (95% CI, -17.4; -4.2) vs. 9.8 bpm (95% CI, -11.1; -8.4)), respectively, in both sexes' absolute and relative changes comparably. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased only in males (3.7% (95% CI, 0.6; 6.9)). Changes in left ventricular mass and cardiac output (CO) were only reported in males and changed -20.6 g (95% CI, -56.3; 15.1) and -0.1 L (95% CI, -0.5; 0.2), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BBs comparably lowered BP and HR in both sexes. The lack of change in CO in males suggests that the reduction in BP is primarily due to a decrease in vascular resistance. Furthermore, females were underrepresented compared to males. We recommend that future research should include more females and sex-stratified data when researching the treatment effects of antihypertensives.

Effectiveness of β-blockers in physically active patients with hypertension: protocol of a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Based on more than 5 decades of epidemiological studies, it is now widely accepted that higher physical activity patterns and levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with better health outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to consider how treatment methods affect these two components. Clinically, one very important question concerns the influence of aerobic performance on patients being treated for hypertension. The administration of β-blockers can significantly reduce maximal-and especially submaximal-aerobic exercise capacity. The objective of this review is to determine, by comparison of existing mono and combination therapy, which β-blockers are less physically limiting for patients with hypertension who are physically active.

METHODS

A three-step strategy will be adopted in the review, following the methods used by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The initial search will be conducted using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The second search will involve the listed databases for the published literature (MEDLINE, Biomedica Czechoslovaca, Tripdatabase, Pedro, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cinahl, WoS) and the unpublished literature (Open Grey, Current Controlled Trials, MedNar, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cos Conference Papers Index, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO). Following the JBI methodology, analysis of title/abstracts and full texts, critical appraisal and data extraction will be carried out on selected studies using the JBI tool, MAStARI. This will be performed by two independent reviewers. If possible, statistical meta-analysis will be pooled. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed. Subgroup analysis will be used for different age and gender characteristics. Funnel plots, Begg's rank correlation and Egger's regression test will be used to detect or correct publication bias.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results will be disseminated by publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethical assessment is not needed-we will search/evaluate the existing sources of literature.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015026914.

Clinical updates on carvedilol: a first choice beta-blocker in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Carvedilol, a non-selective beta-blocker, has recently drawn attention because of its therapeutic benefits over other prescribed analogues for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The present review attempts to present the clinical efficacy of carvedilol in comparison to other available beta-blockers. The literature search was carried out in three electronic databases (Unbound Medline, Pubmed and Sciencedirect) and internet search engines (Scirus and Google Scholar) without time constraints to ensure maximum literature coverage.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

A relatively large number of comparative studies have revealed that carvedilol has advantage over traditional beta-blockers with respect to hemodynamic and metabolic effects, due to its unique non-selective alpha-/beta-adrenoceptor affinity. Such results indicate its safe and effective therapeutic application particularly in patients with complicated CVDs, even in pediatric and geriatric patients.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The therapeutic profile of carvedilol indicates its suitability for treatment of complicated CVDs than other non-selective beta-blockers. However, there is a limitation in terms of its dose due to its low bioavailability (approximately 25%). Therefore, there is still need for bioavailability enhancement and dose reduction to further improve the therapeutic efficacy of the drug.

Mechanisms of the beneficial effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in congestive heart failure

Many clinical studies have documented favourable effects (reduced morbidity and mortality) of beta-adrenoceptor (β-AR) antagonists, such as carvedilol, metoprolol, propranolol, atenolol and bisoprolol, in congestive heart failure. These agents attenuate the effects of sympathetic activation during the development of heart failure, prevent ventricular remodelling and improve cardiac function. Because β-AR blockers are known to exert negative inotropic action, the mechanisms responsible for their beneficial effects in heart failure have been a subject of debate. While attenuation of changes in β-AR cyclic AMP-mediated signal transduction in heart failure is considered to be responsible for the beneficial effects of β-AR antagonists, other mechanisms such as the effects of these agents on subcellular remodelling, oxidative stress, apoptosis and defect in calcium handling, are equally important in preventing cardiac alterations in the failing heart. Moreover, β-AR antagonists are not a homogeneous group of drugs because they differ in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, in addition to the selective and nonselective nature of their actions on β-AR. Various β-AR blocking agents have been shown to possess different ancillary properties and produce effects that are independent of β-AR. In fact, different β-AR antagonists have been observed to lower the elevated levels of plasma catecholamines in heart failure. Thus, the beneficial effects of β-AR antagonists are not only elicited through their interaction with mediated β-AR signal transduction sites in the myocardium, but other mechanisms may also contribute to their favourable actions in heart failure.

Differential effects of carvedilol and metoprolol succinate on plasma norepinephrine release and peak exercise heart rate in subjects with chronic heart failure

Dosing equivalency of carvedilol and metoprolol remains a debate. Degree of beta 1-blockade is best assessed by blunting of the exercise-induced heart rate. Accordingly, the authors have investigated dosing equivalency by examining baseline and peak exercise heart rates and norepinephrine levels in subjects with chronic heart failure treated with carvedilol or metoprolol. Thirty-seven subjects treated with carvedilol (32.9 +/- 3.5 mg; n = 23) or metoprolol succinate (XL) (96.4 +/- 15.9 mg; n = 14) referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing were studied prospectively. Carvedilol versus metoprolol XL subjects did not differ with respect to baseline heart rate (73 +/- 2 vs 70 +/- 3 bpm), or baseline plasma norepinephrine levels (597.5 +/- 78.3 vs 602.1 +/- 69.6 pg/mL), P = NS. However, despite similar peak exercise norepinephrine levels (2735.8 +/- 320.1 vs 2403.1 +/- 371.6 pg/mL), heart rate at peak exercise was higher in subjects receiving carvedilol (135 +/- 4 bpm) than those receiving metoprolol XL (117 +/- 6 bpm), P = 0.02. Similar norepinephrine release and more complete beta 1-blockade is observed in well-matched subjects with chronic heart failure treated with a mean daily dose of metoprolol XL 96.4 mg compared with carvedilol 32.9 mg.

Hypothermia in the geriatric population

Hypothermia is common in the geriatric population and its significance perhaps under-recognized. Hypothermia is associated with substantial morbidity and fatality, but to some extent is preventable provided caregivers and providers of healthcare to older adults adopt preventive measures to lower its occurrence. Hypothermia occurs in both cold and warm settings; its pathogenesis involves alterations in the age-related physiology of thermoregulation, along with a variable combination of environmental factors, disease processes and medications, many of which are recognizable. Once diagnosed, treatment must be prompt and aggressive, and must consider several options for rewarming. Education of healthcare providers regarding early recognition of hypothermia and a better understanding of preventive and treatment measures will undoubtedly lower complications of hypothermia in affected elderly.

Adrenergic blocker carvedilol attenuates the cardiovascular and aversive effects of nicotine in abstinent smokers

The cardiovascular response to nicotine is mediated mainly by noradrenergic activation. Whether noradrenergic activation mediates other effects of nicotine has not been well documented in humans. In this study, we examined the effects of an alpha and beta-adrenergic receptor blocker: carvedilol, on cardiovascular and subjective responses to nicotine lozenge and on the ability of nicotine lozenge to suppress tobacco withdrawal symptoms in overnight abstinent smokers. Fifteen smokers, nine men and six women, participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. In each of the three experimental sessions, participants were treated orally with a single 25 or 50 mg dose of carvedilol or placebo. Two hours and 10 min following the medication treatment, participants received a single 4 mg nicotine lozenge. Carvedilol treatment attenuated the nicotine-induced heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure increases. Carvedilol also attenuated the self-report rating of 'bad effects' in response to nicotine. Carvedilol, alone or in combination with nicotine lozenge, did not affect tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Carvedilol treatment did not affect performance on the Stroop Test. These results support the effectiveness of carvedilol for attenuating the cardiovascular effects of nicotine. Attenuation of the rating of 'bad effects' by carvedilol suggests that noradrenergic activation may also mediate the aversive effects of nicotine.

Effect of adrenergic blockade on plasma adrenomedullin concentration during static handgrip in patients with heart failure

Our previous study showed that static handgrip caused increases in the plasma adrenomedullin (ADM) both in patients with heart failure (HF) and healthy subjects. The present study was designed to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in mediating plasma ADM changes during handgrip in patients with HF. Twelve male HF patients (II class NYHA) treated with carvedilol, a non-selective adrenergic blocker (TC) and 12 patients untreated with carvedilol (UC) performed two 3-min bouts of static handgrip at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, alternately with each hand. At the end of both exercise bouts and in 5 min of the recovery period, plasma ADM and catecholamines were determined. In addition, heart rate, blood pressure and stroke volume (SV) were measured. The baseline plasma ADM, noradrenaline (NA) and adrenaline (A) levels were similar in the two groups of patients, while SV was higher (P<0.05) in TC than in UC. During exercise plasma ADM concentrations were lower (P<0.05) in TC than in UC, but the handgrip-induced increases in plasma ADM did not differ between the groups. Plasma ADM correlated with NA concentrations (r = 0.764) and with SV (r = -0.435) and increases in plasma ADM expressed as percentage of baseline values correlated with those of plasma NA (r = 0.499), diastolic BP (r = 0.550) and total peripheral resistance (r = 0.435). The study suggests that the sympathetic nervous system may be involved in the stimulation of ADM secretion during static exercise either directly or by changes in the haemodynamic response.

Carvedilol reverses hyperthermia and attenuates rhabdomyolysis induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) in an animal model

OBJECTIVE

Hyperthermia is a potentially fatal manifestation of severe 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) intoxication. No proven effective drug treatment exists to reverse this potentially life-threatening hyperthermia, likely because mechanisms of peripheral thermogenesis are poorly understood. Using a rat model of MDMA hyperthermia, we evaluated the acute drug-induced changes in plasma catecholamines and used these results as a basis for the selection of drugs that could potentially reverse this hyperthermia.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, randomized animal study.

SETTING

A research institute laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Male, adult Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Based on MDMA-induced changes in plasma catecholamine levels, rats were subjected to the nonselective (beta1 + beta2) adrenergic receptor antagonists propranolol or nadolol or the alpha1- + beta1,2,3-adrenergic receptor antagonist carvedilol before or after a thermogenic challenge of MDMA.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma catecholamines levels 30 mins after MDMA (40 mg/kg, subcutaneously) were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection. Core temperature was measured by a rectal probe attached to a thermocouple. Four hours after MDMA treatment, blood was drawn and serum creatine kinase levels were measured as a marker of rhabdomyolysis using a Vitros analyzer. MDMA induced a 35-fold increase in norepinephrine levels, a 20-fold increase in epinephrine, and a 2.4-fold increase in dopamine levels. Propranolol (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) or nadolol (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) administered 30 mins before MDMA had no effect on the thermogenic response. In contrast, carvedilol (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) administered 15 mins before or after MDMA prevented this hyperthermic response. Moreover, when administered 1 hr after MDMA, carvedilol completely reversed established hyperthermia and significantly attenuated subsequent MDMA-induced creatine kinase release.

CONCLUSION

These data show that alpha1 and beta3-adrenergic receptors may contribute to the mediation of MDMA-induced hyperthermia and that drugs targeting these receptors, such as carvedilol, warrant further investigation as novel therapies for the treatment of psychostimulant-induced hyperthermia and its sequelae.

Hemodynamic effects of carvedilol infusion and the contribution of the sympathetic nervous system in rats with heart failure

We investigated the contribution of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in maintaining the blood pressure and in regulating the cardiac function during and after carvedilol administration in rats with heart failure (group F). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, percent functional shortening, and rates of intraventricular pressure rise were significantly changed by carvedilol infusion as compared with the basal values in group N (normal rats), but not in group F. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was elevated, corresponding to the enhancement of the plasma norepinephrine (NE) concentration caused by carvedilol infusion, in group N. The enhancement of the plasma NE concentration induced by carvedilol administration in group F was higher than that in group N. The value for the maximal hypertensive effect of NE intravenous infusion (Emax) was decreased, and the plasma NE concentration at half-maximal effect (EC50) was increased in group F as compared with the values in group N. These results indicate that the SNS (presynaptic) activity is increased and that the SNS receptor sensitivity in the cardiovascular regulation system is decreased in heart failure.

Carvedilol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure

Carvedilol (Dilatrend) blocks beta(1)-, beta(2)- and alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, and has antioxidant and antiproliferative effects. Carvedilol improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in numerous studies. Moreover, significantly greater increases from baseline in LVEF were seen with carvedilol than with metoprolol in a double-blind, randomised study and in a meta-analysis. Carvedilol also reversed or attenuated left ventricular remodelling in patients with CHF and in those with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Combined analysis of studies in the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program (patients had varying severities of CHF; n = 1094) revealed that mortality was significantly lower in carvedilol than in placebo recipients. In addition, the risk of hospitalisation for any cardiovascular cause was significantly lower with carvedilol than with placebo. Mortality was significantly lower with carvedilol than with metoprolol in patients with mild to severe CHF in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) [n = 3029]. The Carvedilol Prospective Randomised Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) trial (n = 2289) demonstrated that compared with placebo, carvedilol was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint of death or hospitalisation for any reason in severe CHF. All-cause mortality was reduced in patients who received carvedilol in addition to conventional therapy compared with those who received placebo plus conventional therapy in the Carvedilol Post-Infarct Survival Control in LV Dysfunction (CAPRICORN) trial (enrolling 1959 patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute MI). Carvedilol was generally well tolerated in patients with CHF. Adverse events associated with the alpha- and beta-blocking effects of the drug occurred more commonly with carvedilol than with placebo, whereas placebo recipients were more likely to experience worsening heart failure. In conclusion, carvedilol blocks beta(1)-, beta(2)- and alpha(1)-adrenoceptors and has a unique pharmacological profile. It is thought that additional properties of carvedilol (e.g. antioxidant and antiproliferative effects) contribute to its beneficial effects in CHF. Carvedilol improves ventricular function and reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with mild to severe CHF, and should be considered a standard treatment option in this setting. Administering carvedilol in addition to conventional therapy reduces mortality and attenuates myocardial remodelling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute MI. Moreover, mortality was significantly lower with carvedilol than with metoprolol in patients with mild to severe CHF, suggesting that carvedilol may be the preferred beta-blocker.

Plasma membrane-associated nucleoside diphosphate kinase (nm23) in the heart is regulated by beta-adrenergic signaling

1. Receptor-independent activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by plasma membrane-associated nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK) has been demonstrated in vivo, and elevated levels of NDPK were found in purified sarcolemmal membranes of patients with end-stage heart failure. 2. Among 22 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure who underwent cardiac transplantation, those treated with a beta-blocker (n=8) had a 65% lower NDPK content and activity in the cardiac sarcolemma, compared to patients with similar base line characteristics who had no beta-blocker therapy (n=14). 3. The lower NDPK was associated with a reduced NDPK-dependent, Gi-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity, as assessed by in vitro measurement of adenylyl cyclase activity in the presence of GDP or its kinase-resistant analog guanosine 5'-O-(2-thio)diphosphate (GDPbetaS). 4. We further tested whether treatment with a beta-adrenergic agonist would induce an increase in sarcolemmal NDPK. Rats treated with isoproterenol developed myocardial hypertrophy, and NDPK in the sarcolemma rose by 60% during 14 days of treatment. The beta-blocker propranolol prevented both effects. When hypertrophy was induced with thyroid hormone, NDPK did not increase. 5. In conclusion, chronic activation of beta-adrenergic receptors increases the binding of NDPK to cardiac sarcolemma, where it may activate heterotrimeric G proteins.