Splenic irradiation for symptomatic splenomegaly associated with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia

Spleen-targeted delivery systems and strategies for spleen-related diseases

The spleen, body's largest secondary lymphoid organ, is also a vital hematopoietic and immunological organ. It is regarded as one of the most significant organs in humans. As more researchers recognize the functions of the spleen, clinical methods for treating splenic diseases and spleen-targeted drug delivery systems to improve the efficacy of spleen-related therapies have gradually developed. Many modification strategies (size, charge, ligand, protein corona) and hitchhiking strategies (erythrocytes, neutrophils) of nanoparticles (NPs) have shown a significant increase in spleen targeting efficiency. However, most of the targeted drug therapy strategies for the spleen are to enhance or inhibit the immune function of the spleen to achieve therapeutic effects, and there are few studies on spleen-related diseases. In this review, we not only provide a detailed summary of the design rules for spleen-targeted drug delivery systems in recent years, but also introduce common spleen diseases (splenic tumors, splenic injuries, and splenomegaly) with the hopes of generating more ideas for future spleen research.

Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: Impact on hierarchy of treatment choices

The primary objective of treatment in myelofibrosis (MF) is prolongation of life, which is currently accomplished only by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Determination of optimal timing for AHSCT is facilitated by molecular risk stratification. Non-transplant treatment options in MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi): momelotinib (FDA approved on September 15, 2023), ruxolitinib (November 16, 2011), fedratinib (August 16, 2019), and pacritinib (February 28, 2022); all four JAKi are effective in reducing spleen size and alleviating symptoms, considered a drug class effect and attributed to their canonical JAK-STAT inhibitory mechanism of action. In addition, momelotinib exhibits erythropoietic effect, attributed to alleviation of ineffective erythropoiesis through inhibition of activin A receptor type-I (ACVR1). In transplant-ineligible or deferred patients, the order of treatment preference is based on specific symptoms and individual assessment of risk tolerance. Because of drug-induced immunosuppression and other toxicities attributed to JAKi, we prefer non-JAKi drugs as initial treatment for MF-associated anemia that is not accompanied by treatment-requiring splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms. Otherwise, it is reasonable to consider momelotinib as the first-line JAKi treatment of choice, in order to target the triad of quality-of-life offenders in MF: anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms/cachexia. For second-line therapy, we favor ruxolitinib, over fedratinib, based on toxicity profile. Pacritinib and fedratinib provide alternative options in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia or ruxolitinib-resistance/intolerance, respectively. Splenectomy remains a viable option for drug-resistant symptomatic splenomegaly and cytopenia.

Pharmacotherapeutic advances for splenomegaly in myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis is a hematologic malignancy with a variety of clinical manifestations including splenomegaly, which is present in approximately 80% of newly diagnosed patients. JAK inhibitors are the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment for splenomegaly in myelofibrosis, although spleen size reduction is not universal, and the duration of benefit is only moderately durable.

AREAS COVERED

We first discuss the pathobiology of splenomegaly in myelofibrosis before detailing approved and novel pharmacotherapies that can reduce spleen size while also highlighting non-pharmacologic approaches. In this review, efficacy of these treatments is measured solely by spleen volume reduction, acknowledging that other outcome measures such as symptom improvement and survival are also critical.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, ruxolitinib can be administered to the majority of frontline patients although those with severe thrombocytopenia should receive pacritinib to address spleen burden. Momelotinib may be particularly well suited for patients with significant anemia and novel combination treatments in clinical development may improve the depth and duration of spleen responses. After frontline treatment failure, fedratinib, or pacritinib are commercial options for patients with persistent symptomatic splenomegaly. Novel agents given alone or in combination with a JAK inhibitor are being explored in trials, which may ameliorate splenomegaly and ultimately improve disease progression.

Improving symptom burden and quality of life in patients with myelofibrosis: current strategies and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a complex and aggressive hematologic malignancy resulting from JAK/STAT-driven myeloproliferation and abnormal fibrogenesis. The clinical manifestations are heterogeneous and negatively impact quality of life and survival. JAK inhibitors improve symptoms and splenomegaly to a variable degree in a proportion of patients, but the effects for many patients are insufficient or short-lived.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the constellation of symptoms that befall patients with MF, describes methods to quantify and serially monitor these symptoms, and evaluates pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions for disease-related symptoms. The review also includes a discussion of areas of unmet medical need, and proposes future methods for meeting this need.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment landscape for MF is evolving rapidly. The most effective therapies or combinations of therapies will likely simultaneously impact both the malignant hematopoietic stem cell and mechanisms of aberrant fibrogenesis that drive this disease. The goals of treatment for patients with myelofibrosis should be to improve length and quality of life. Clinical trials must be designed with these goals in mind, with endpoints focused on overall survival and symptom reduction, as opposed to surrogate endpoints such as spleen volume reduction.

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: 2021

The aim of this review is to update the current status of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We have first summarized the issue of an indication for allogeneic HSCT, discussing several prognostic scoring systems, developed to predict the outcome of MF, and therefore to identify patients who will benefit of an allogeneic HSCT. Patients with low risk MF are usually not selected for a transplant, whereas patients with intermediate or high risk MF are eligible. A separate issue, is how to predict the outcome of HSCT: we will outline a clinical molecular myelofibrosis transplant scoring system (MTSS), which predicts overall survival, ranging from 90% for low risk patients, to 20% for very high risk patients. We will also discuss transfusion burden and spleen size, as predictors of transplant outcome. The choice of a transplant platform including the conditioning regimen, the stem cell source and GvHD prophylaxis, are crucial for a successful program in MF, and will be outlined. Complications such as poor graft function, graft failure, GvHD and relapse of the disease, will also be reviewed. Finally we discuss monitoring the disease after HSCT with donor chimerism, driver mutations and hematologic data. We have made an effort to make this review as comprehensive and up to date as possible, and we hope it will provide some useful data for the clinicians.

Dosimetric accuracy of dual isocenter irradiation in low magnetic field resonance guided radiotherapy system for extended abdominal tumours

PURPOSE

Due to limited field size of Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerators (MR-Linac), some treatments could require a dual-isocenter planning approach to achieve a complete target coverage and thus exploit the benefits of the online adaptation. This study evaluates the dosimetric accuracy of the dual-isocenter intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery technique for MR-Linac.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Dual-isocenter multi leaf collimator (MLC) and couch accuracy tests have been performed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of the system. A mono-isocenter plan delivered in clinical practice has then been retrospectively re-planned with dual-isocenter technique. The dual-isocenter plan has been re-calculated and delivered on a 3-dimensional (3D) ArcCHECK phantom and 2-dimensional (2D) films to assess its dosimetric accuracy in terms of gamma analysis. Clinical and planning target volume (CTV and PTV respectively) coverage robustness was then investigated after the introduction of ± 2 mm and ± 5 mm positioning errors by shifting the couch.

RESULTS

MLC and couch accuracy tests confirmed the system accuracy in delivering a dual-isocenter irradiation. 2D/3D gamma analysis results occurred always to be above 95% if considered a gamma criteria 1%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm respectively for the 2D and 3D analysis. The mean variations for CTV D98% and PTV V95% were 0.2% and 1.1% respectively when positioning error was introduced separately in each direction, while the maximum observed variations were 0.9% (CTV) and 3.7% (PTV).

CONCLUSION

The dosimetric accuracy of dual-isocenter irradiation has been verified for MR-Linac, achieving accurate and robust treatment strategy and improving dose conformality also in presence of targets whose extension exceeds the nominal maximum field size.

Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: A retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT)

The role of spleen size and splenectomy for the prediction of post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) outcome in myelofibrosis remains under debate. In EBMT registry, we identified a cohort of 1195 myelofibrosis patients transplanted between 2000-2017 after either fludarabine-busulfan or fludarabine-melphalan regimens. Overall, splenectomy was performed in 202 (16.9%) patients and its use decreased over time (28.3% in 2000-2009 vs 14.1% in 2010-2017 period). By multivariate analysis, splenectomy was associated with less NRM (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93, P = .018) but increased risk of relapse (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.02, P = .042), with no significant impact on OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.12, P = .274). However, in subset analysis comparing the impact of splenectomy vs specific spleen sizes, for patients with progressive disease, an improved survival was seen in splenectomised subjects compared to those patients with a palpable spleen length ≥ 15 cm (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, P < .001), caused by a significant reduction in NRM (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.49, P < .001), without significantly increased relapse risk (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.87-2.49, P = .147). Overall, despite the possible biases typical of retrospective cohorts, this study highlights the potential detrimental effect of massive splenomegaly in transplant outcome and supports the role of splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with progressive disease and large splenomegaly.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations. Additional disease features include bone marrow reticulin/collagen fibrosis, aberrant inflammatory cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

Bone marrow morphology is the primary basis for diagnosis. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in around 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis; these mutations are also prevalent in the closely related MPNs, namely polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The 2016 World Health Organization classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation. Furthermore, approximately 15% of patients with ET or PV might progress into a PMF-like phenotype (post-ET/PV MF) during their clinical course.

ADVERSE MUTATIONS

SRSF2, ASXL1, and U2AF1-Q157 mutations predict inferior survival in PMF, independent of each other and other risk factors. RAS/CBL mutations predicted resistance to ruxolitinib therapy.

ADVERSE KARYOTYPE

Very high risk abnormalities include -7, inv (3), i(17q), +21, +19, 12p-, and 11q-.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (MIPSSv2; mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSSv2 includes, in addition, clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSSv2 five risk categories.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation alone is advised for MIPSSv2 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is the preferred treatment for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0%-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. In non-transplant candidates, conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide, and danazol; for symptomatic splenomegaly, hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib; and for constitutional symptoms, ruxolitinib. Fedratinib, another JAK2 inhibitor, has now been FDA-approved for use in ruxolitinib failures. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for non-hepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.

NEW DIRECTIONS

A number of new agents, alone or in combination with ruxolitinib, are currently under investigation for MF treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov); preliminary results from some of these clinical trials were presented at the 2020 ASH annual meeting and highlighted in the current document.

Splenomegaly May Increase the Risk of Rejection in Low-Risk Matched Related Donor Transplant for Thalassemia, This Risk Can Be Partially Overcome by Additional Immunosuppression during Conditioning

Severe thalassemia syndromes (ST) are highly curable by bone marrow transplant (BMT), but rejection may still occur. We retrospectively analyzed our fully matched related donor transplants to establish if isolated splenomegaly is an independent risk factor for rejection and if this risk can be reduced by modifying the conditioning protocol. In this study, we compared rejection rates between patients with and without splenomegaly in 189 consecutive low-risk ST transplants across 2 sequential conditioning regimens: regimen A (August 2013 to December 2016): busulfan (14 mg/kg oral, not adjusted to serum levels), cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg), and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (Genzyme (Sanofi, Paris, France) 4 mg/kg or Fresenius (Grafalon, Neovii Biotech GmbH, Gräfelfing Germany) 16 mg/kg on days -12 to -10), and regimen B: same backbone as regimen A except fludarabine total dose of 150 mg was added upfront and ATG dose was increased to 7 mg/kg in case of splenomegaly and/or sex-mismatched transplants (January 2017 to September 2018). Compared with regimen A, in regimen B, both overall rejection rates (RRs) (16% versus 6.5%, P = .023) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) (9.9% versus 2.8%, P = .038) improved significantly. By Cox regression analysis, the improvement in RR between the 2 protocols was particularly significant in patients with splenomegaly (RR 54.5% versus 6.5%, P = .00015; TRM 18.2% versus 6.5%, P = .25) (hazard ratio, 4.13; confidence interval, 1.61 to 10.6; P = .003). The increased risk of rejection related to splenomegaly can be overcome by adding fludarabine to the standard ATG-Busulfan- Cyclophosphamide (ATG-Bu-Cy) protocol without significantly increasing transplant-related morbidity and mortality or resorting to splenectomy pre-BMT.

Modern management of splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm which can lead to massive splenomegaly secondary to extramedullary hematopoiesis. Patients frequently exhibit debilitating symptoms including pain and early satiety, in addition to cellular sequestration causing severe cytopenias. JAK 1/2 inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib, are the mainstay of therapy and produce significant and durable reductions in spleen volume. However, many patients are not eligible for JAK 2 inhibitor therapy or become refractory to treatment over time. Novel therapies are in development that can reduce the degree of splenomegaly for some of these patients. However, splenectomy, splenic irradiation, and partial splenic artery embolization remain valuable therapeutic options in select patients. In this review, we will discuss currently available pharmacologic therapies and describe promising drugs currently in development. We will also delve into the efficacy and safety concerns of splenectomy, splenic irradiation, and partial splenic artery embolization. Finally, we will propose a treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians in the management of symptomatic splenomegaly in patients with MF.

Splenectomy in Myelofibrosis: Indications, Efficacy, and Complications

Splenomegaly, which may range from a few centimeters below the left costal border to massive dimensions, is one of the most characteristic features in patients with advanced myelofibrosis (MF). Splenectomy may offer an effective therapeutic option for treating massive splenomegaly in patients with MF, and especially in cases of disease refractory to conventional drugs, but it is associated with a number of complications as well as substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether splenectomy should be performed before allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is also controversial, and there is a lack of prospective randomized clinical trials that assess the role of splenectomy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with MF. Although splenectomy is not routinely performed before transplantation, it may be appropriate in patients with massive splenomegaly and related symptoms, so long as the higher risk of graft failure in such cases is taken into account. This review aims to describe the efficacy, indications, and complications of splenectomy in patients with MF; and to evaluate the long-term impact of splenectomy on patient survival and risk of disease transformation.

A provider's guide to primary myelofibrosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Although understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular biology of primary myelofibrosis continues to improve, treatment options are limited, and several biological features remain unexplained. With an appropriate clinical history, exam, laboratory evaluation, and bone marrow biopsy, the diagnosis can often be established. Recent studies have better characterized prognostic factors and driver mutations in myelofibrosis, facilitated by use of next-generation sequencing. These advances have facilitated development of a management strategy that is based on both risk factors and clinical phenotype. For low-risk patients, treatment will depend on symptom severity. For patients with higher-risk disease, several treatments are available including JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and clinical trials using novel molecularly targeted therapies and rational drug combinations. In this review, we outline what is known about the disease pathogenesis, discuss an approach to reaching the diagnosis, review the prognosis of myelofibrosis, and detail current therapeutic strategies.

Patterns of Ruxolitinib Therapy Failure and Its Management in Myelofibrosis: Perspectives of the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group

Ruxolitinib improves splenomegaly and other disease-related symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis, but over time, many patients lose this benefit. It is difficult to determine whether this is due to resistance or intolerance to the drug; thus, we have used the more inclusive term of ruxolitinib failure. The survival of patients with myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure is poor but varies significantly by the pattern of the failure, underlining the need for a clinically appropriate classification. In this review, we propose diagnostic guidance for early recognition of the pattern of ruxolitinib failure and we recommend treatment options. The most frequent patterns of ruxolitinib failure are loss or failure to obtain a significant reduction in splenomegaly or symptom response, and the development or persistence of clinically significant cytopenias. Ruxolitinib dose modification and other ancillary therapies are sometimes helpful, and splenectomy is a palliative option in selected cases. Stem-cell transplantation is the only curative option for these patterns of failure, but its restricted applicability due to toxicity highlights the importance of ongoing clinical trials in this area. Recent approval of fedratinib by the US Food and Drug Administration provides an alternative option for patients with suboptimal or loss of spleen response. The transformation of myelofibrosis to accelerated or blast phase is an infrequent form of failure with an extremely poor prognosis, whereby patients who are ineligible for transplantation have limited treatment options.

Splenic irradiation before allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Splenectomy before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) remains a matter of debate, and conflicting results have been reported to date. The procedure seems to fasten post-transplant hematological recovery, but it does not have an impact on survival. The role of pre-transplant splenic irradiation (SI) is much more difficult to evaluate. Forty-four patients (25 males and 19 females) with MF at median age of 49 years at diagnosis (range 14-67) underwent ASCT. The post-transplant outcome was compared between irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Eleven patients received irradiation before transplantation. Median dose of radiation was 1000 cGy (range 600-2400). There was no difference in median time to engraftment between patients with and without previous radiotherapy. Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurred in 47% and 36% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in GVHD incidence between groups. Eight patients relapsed/progressed in irradiated group versus 17 in non-irradiated (70% vs. 51%; p = 0.3). Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia was observed in 3 patients: 2 in irradiated and 1 in non-irradiated group. In total, 22 patients died with no statistical difference in death rate between irradiated and non-irradiated subjects. The probability of overall survival after transplant for the entire cohort at 2 years was 54% (72% for irradiated and 48% for non-irradiated patients; p = 0.25). Splenic irradiation prior to ASCT for myelofibrosis has not beneficial effect on post-transplant outcome.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations; additional disease features include bone marrow stromal reaction including reticulin fibrosis, abnormal cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of PMF is based on bone marrow morphology. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in ∼ 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis. The revised 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation and it is prognostically relevant to distinguish the two.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 utilizes both genetic and clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 five risk categories. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 requires an online score calculator (http://www.mipss70score.it) while GIPPS offers a lower complexity prognostic tool.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation alone is advised for MIPSS70+ version 2.0 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic stem cell transplant is the preferred treatment of choice for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. All other treatment approaches, including the use of JAK2 inhibitors, are mostly palliative and should not be used in the absence of clear treatment indications. Conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide and danazol, for symptomatic splenomegaly hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib and for constitutional symptoms ruxolitinib. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for nonhepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of primary myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) in which dysregulation of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathways is the major pathogenic mechanism. Most patients with PMF carry a driver mutation in the JAK2, MPL (myeloproliferative leukemia), or CALR (calreticulin) genes. Mutations in epigenetic regulators and RNA splicing genes may also occur, and play critical roles in PMF disease progression. Based on revised World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for MPNs, both screening for driver mutations and bone marrow biopsy are required for a specific diagnosis. Clinical trials of JAK2 inhibitors for PMF have revealed significant efficacy for improving splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. However, the currently available drug therapies for PMF do not improve survival. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation is potentially curative, it is associated with substantial treatment-related morbidity and mortality. PMF is a heterogeneous disorder and decisions regarding treatments are often complicated, necessitating the use of prognostic models to determine the management of treatments for individual patients. This review focuses on the clinical aspects and outcomes of a cohort of Japanese patients with PMF, including discussion of recent advances in the management of PMF.

The role of bone marrow and spleen irradiation in the development of acute hematologic toxicity during chemoradiation for esophageal cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of splenic and thoracic bone marrow irradiation on hematologic toxicity in the setting of chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer.

Methods and materials

We analyzed 60 patients with carcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who received concurrent chemoradiation in the preoperative or definitive setting. Dosimetric and volumetric parameters were calculated for the spleen, thoracic spine, and posterior ribs. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity (HT3+). Associations were assessed using logistic and linear regression models.

Results

Twenty-one patients (35%) experienced HT3+, including 18 patients with leukopenia and 5 with thrombocytopenia. Higher spleen V5-V20 was correlated with a lower risk of HT3+ on multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.83 per 10 cm³ increase in V10; P = .013). A dose-dependent decrease in spleen volume was observed after radiation therapy, and a greater decrease was independently associated with a lower risk of HT3+ (odds ratio: 0.93 per 1% volume decrease; P = .014). Dosimetric parameters of the thoracic spine were not significantly associated with HT3+.

Conclusions

A greater decrease in spleen size after radiation therapy and a higher spleen V5-V20 were independently associated with a lower risk of severe hematologic toxicity. Splenic irradiation may mitigate leukopenia associated with chemoradiation therapy.

Treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly with low doses of radiotherapy: Retrospective analysis and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of low doses of radiation therapy for symptomatic splenomegaly in malignant and benign diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

5 patients with symptomatic splenomegaly were treated with low doses of radiation in our centre (January 2008-December 2016). 4/5 patients had malignant neoplasia (acute myeloid leukemia, non Hogdkin lymphoma and prolymphocytic B cell leukemia) and splenomegaly was caused by extramedullary hematopoiesis. 1/5 patient had benign disease (HBV liver cirrhosis) and splenomegaly was caused by vascular ectasia. Median age was 73 years (range 61-86 years). There were 4 females and 1 male. These patients had exclusively splenic pain or abdominal discomfort in 20%, exclusively cytopenias 40% and both 40%. Patients needed radiation therapy for symptomatic control. Dose per fraction was 0.5 Gy every two days; total dose initially prescribed 10 Gy. IGRT were performed in all patients to ensure an appropriate position and to adapt the treatment volume to the changes in the spleen volume along the treatment. Median craneocaudal length size of the spleen was more than 26 cm (range 15.2-34.9 cm).

RESULTS

Median radiation doses were 4.85 Gy (range 2.5-10). Median craneocaudal spleen size reduction was 4.6 cm (0-8 cm). Splenic pain and abdominal disturbances improved in all patients. Median increase of haemoglobin and platelets levels was 1.6 mg/dl and 27.950 cells respectively in the first week after the end of radiotherapy.One patient had to interrupt her treatment due to grade II neutropenia. No other toxicities were described. With a median follow-up of 39 months (16-89 months), only one recurrence was described at 24 months and consisted of thrombocytopenia. The patient received a second course of radiotherapy with excellent response.

CONCLUSION

Low doses of radiation therapy for treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly were effective, with a low rate of side effects. Splenic pain and abdominal discomfort completely improved and cytopenias rised to secure levels.

Splenic irradiation for splenomegaly: A systematic review

Splenic irradiation (SI) is a palliative treatment option for symptomatic splenomegaly (i.e. for pain, early satiety, pancytopenia from sequestration) secondary to hematologic malignancies and disorders. The purpose of the current article is to review the literature on SI for hematologic malignancies and disorders, including: (1) patient selection and optimal technique; (2) efficacy of SI; and (3) toxicities of SI. PICOS/PRISMA methods are used to select 27 articles including 766 courses of SI for 486 patients from 1960 to 2016. The most common cancers treated included chronic lymphocytic leukemia and myeloproliferative disorders; the most common regimen was 10Gy in 1Gy fractions over two weeks, and 27% of patients received retreatment. A partial or complete response (for symptoms, lab abnormalities) was obtained in 85-90% of treated patients, and 30% were retreated within 6-12months. There was no correlation between biologically equivalent dose of radiation therapy and response duration, pain relief, spleen reduction, or cytopenia improvement (r2 all <0.4); therefore, lower doses (e.g. 5Gy in 5 fractions) may be as effective as higher doses. Grade 3-4 toxicity (typically leukopenia, infection) was noted in 22% of courses, with grade 5 toxicity in 0.7% of courses. All grade 5 toxicities were due to either thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage or leukopenia with sepsis (or a combination of both); they were sequelae of cancer and not directly caused by SI. In summary, SI is generally a safe and efficacious method for treating patients with symptomatic splenomegaly.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

Disease overview: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR or MPL mutation, abnormal cytokine expression, bone marrow fibrosis, anemia, splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on bone marrow morphology. The presence of JAK2, CALR or MPL mutation is supportive but not essential for diagnosis; approximately 90% of patients carry one of these mutations and 10% are "triple-negative." None of these mutations are specific to PMF and are also seen in essential thrombocythemia (ET). According to the revised 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and diagnostic criteria, "prefibrotic" PMF (pre-PMF) is distinguished from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation and it is prognostically relevant to distinguish the two. Risk stratification: The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus (DIPSS-plus) uses eight predictors of inferior survival: age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, leukocytes >25 × 10⁹ /L, circulating blasts ≥1%, constitutional symptoms, red cell transfusion dependency, platelet count <100 × 10⁹ /L and unfavorable karyotype (i.e., complex karyotype or sole or two abnormalities that include +8, -7/7q-, i(17q), inv(3), 5/5q-, 12p-, or 11q23 rearrangement). The presence of 0, 1, "2 or 3" and ≥4 adverse factors defines low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high-risk disease with median survivals of approximately 15.4, 6.5, 2.9 and 1.3 years, respectively. Most recently, DIPSS-plus-independent adverse prognostic relevance has been demonstrated for certain mutations including ASXL1 and SRSF2 whereas patients with type 1/like CALR mutations, compared to their counterparts with other driver mutations, displayed significantly better survival. Risk-adapted therapy: Observation alone is a reasonable treatment strategy for asymptomatic low or intermediate-1 DIPSS-plus risk disease, especially in the absence of high-risk mutations. All other patients with high or intermediate-2 risk disease, or those harboring high-risk mutations such as ASXL1 or SRSF2, should be considered for stem cell transplant, which is currently the only treatment modality with the potential to favorably modify the natural history of the disease. Non-transplant candidates should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials, since the value of conventional drug therapy, including the use of JAK2 inhibitors, is limited to symptoms palliation and reduction in spleen size. Specifically, JAK2 inhibitors have not been shown to induce complete clinical or cytogenetic remissions or significantly affect JAK2/CALR/MPL mutant allele burden. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly. Involved field radiotherapy is most useful for post-splenectomy hepatomegaly, non-hepatosplenic EMH, PMF-associated pulmonary hypertension and extremity bone pain. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1262-1271, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Treatment of Myelofibrosis: A Moving Target

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that presents either as a primary disease or evolves secondarily from polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia to post-polycythemia vera MF or post-essential thrombocythemia MF, respectively. Myelofibrosis is characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, abnormal cytokine expression, bone marrow fibrosis, anemia, splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival. Therapeutic options for patients with MF have been limited to the use of cytoreductive agents, predominantly hydroxyurea; splenectomy and splenic irradiation for treatment of splenomegaly; and management of anemia with transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, and immunomodulatory agents along with steroids. The only curative option is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality risks. Recently, JAK (Janus kinase) inhibitor therapies have become available and proven to be palliative in primary MF patients with hydroxyurea-refractory splenomegaly and severe constitutional symptoms. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical features of MF; discuss different treatment strategies, including ASCT; and discuss the potential danger and benefit of using JAK inhibitors prior to ASCT.

Reducing symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in the era of Janus kinase inhibitors

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell-derived malignancies that include primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia and are characterized by dysregulated Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling. Clinical manifestations include splenomegaly, cytopenias and/or systemic inflammation. Patients have a heterogeneous symptom profile that includes fatigue, loss of appetite, pruritus and night sweats, which significantly impact quality of life (QoL) and lead to poor survival outcomes. With the introduction of JAK inhibitors, improvement in disease-related symptoms has emerged as a realistic expectation of therapy and an integral measure of clinical efficacy. The JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and is currently under clinical development for polycythemia vera. Ruxolitinib has demonstrated significant reductions in symptom burden, with consequent improvements in QoL measures. With the potential to improve QoL, recognition of the impact and burden of symptoms on patients with MPNs is critical.

Adaptive splenic radiotherapy for symptomatic splenomegaly management in myeloproliferative disorders

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Symptomatic, massive splenomegaly is a debilitating complication of myeloproliferative disorders. In the study, we evaluated the use of a contemporary, individualized radiotherapeutic approach for splenic irradiation, including 3-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning, individualized treatment margins based on splenic motion assessment, online setup verification with volumetric image guidance at each fraction, and adaptive radiation treatment planning to account for changes in splenic size during the fractionated radiotherapy course.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

Between December 2008 and January 2014, 18 patients (13 males, 5 females) with myeloproliferative disorders referred to Gulhane Military Medical Academy Radiation Oncology Department underwent 22 courses of splenic irradiation using 3-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning and volumetric image guidance for palliation of symptomatic splenomegaly.

RESULTS

Median age was 64 years (range 28-79). Significant pain relief was achieved in 20 of the 22 splenic irradiation courses (90.9%). Improvement in hematological parameters was achieved in 8 of the 11 splenic irradiation courses applied for cytopenia (72.7%). At least a 50% reduction in splenic size was achieved in 18 of the 22 splenic irradiation courses (81.8%). Toxicity was manageable with supportive treatment including antiemetics and platelet or red blood cell transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic irradiation with a contemporary radiotherapeutic approach offers safe and effective palliation of symptomatic splenomegaly in myeloproliferative disorders.

How I treat myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal myeloproliferation, dysregulated kinase signaling, and release of abnormal cytokines. In recent years, important progress has been made in the knowledge of the molecular biology and the prognostic assessment of MF. Conventional treatment has limited impact on the patients' survival; it includes a wait-and-see approach for asymptomatic patients, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, or immunomodulatory agents for anemia, cytoreductive drugs such as hydroxyurea for the splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and splenectomy or radiotherapy in selected patients. The discovery of the Janus kinase (JAK)2 mutation triggered the development of molecular targeted therapy of MF. The JAK inhibitors are effective in both JAK2-positive and JAK2-negative MF; one of them, ruxolitinib, is the current best available therapy for MF splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. However, although ruxolitinib has changed the therapeutic scenario of MF, there is no clear indication of a disease-modifying effect. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy of MF, but due to its associated morbidity and mortality, it is usually restricted to eligible high- and intermediate-2-risk MF patients. To improve current therapeutic results, the combination of JAK inhibitors with other agents is currently being tested, and newer drugs are being investigated.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, abnormal cytokine expression, bone marrow fibrosis, anemia, splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

DIAGNOSIS is based on bone marrow morphology. The presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation is supportive but not essential for diagnosis; approximately 90% of patients carry one of these mutations and 10% are "triple-negative." None of these mutations are specific to PMF and are also seen in essential thrombocythemia (ET). Prefibrotic PMF mimics ET in its presentation and the distinction, enabled by careful bone marrow morphological examination, is prognostically relevant. Differential diagnosis also includes chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus (DIPSS-plus) uses eight predictors of inferior survival: age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, leukocytes >25 × 10(9) /L, circulating blasts ≥1%, constitutional symptoms, red cell transfusion dependency, platelet count <100 × 10(9) /L, and unfavorable karyotype (i.e., complex karyotype or sole or two abnormalities that include +8, -7/7q-, i(17q), inv(3), -5/5q-, 12p-, or 11q23 rearrangement). The presence of 0, 1, "2 or 3," and ≥4 adverse factors defines low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk disease with median survivals of approximately 15.4, 6.5, 2.9, and 1.3 years, respectively. High risk disease is also defined by CALR(-) /ASXL1(+) mutational status.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation alone is adequate for asymptomatic low/intermediate-1 risk disease, especially with CALR(+) /ASXL1(-) mutational status. Stem cell transplant is considered for DIPSS-plus high risk disease or any risk disease with CALR(-) /ASXL1(+) mutational status. Investigational drug therapy is reasonable for symptomatic intermediate-1 or intermediate-2 risk disease. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly. Involved field radiotherapy is most useful for post-splenectomy hepatomegaly, non-hepatosplenic EMH, PMF-associated pulmonary hypertension, and extremity bone pain.

The new landscape of therapy for myelofibrosis

The landscape of therapy for myelofibrosis (MF) is evolving at a pace not previously seen for this clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm. The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation in 2005 has led to the rapid development of therapy specifically developed for afflicted MF patients. Indeed, the successful phase III studies of ruxolitinib demonstrating improved symptomatic burden, splenomegaly and survival led to the first approved myelofibrosis drug in the United States and Europe. Multiple additional JAK2 inhibitors are currently in or nearing phase III testing, including SAR302503 (fedratinib), SB1518 (pacritinib) and CYT387 (momelotinib), seeking to offer incremental benefits to ruxolitinib in regards to cytopenias or other disease features. In parallel, phase III testing of pomalidomide is ongoing, with the goal of solidifying the role of immunomodulatory therapy in MF-associated anemia. Multiple single agents strategies are ongoing with histone deacetylase inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors and hypomethylation agents. Incremental advances are further sought, either in additive or synergistic fashion, from combination strategies of ruxolitinib with multiple different approaches ranging from allogeneic stem cell transplant to current therapies mitigating anemia and further impacting the bone marrow microenvironment or histology. Transitioning from a pre-2011 era devoid of approved MF therapies to one of multiple agents that target not only disease course but symptomatic burden has indeed changed the platform from which MF providers are able to launch individualized treatment plans. In this article, we discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic milestones achieved through MF research and review the emerging pharmacologic agents on the treatment horizon.

Splenic irradiation as a component of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis with massive splenomegaly

Primary myelofibrosis is a hematologic neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. A similar clinical condition can occur at late stage of myeloproliferative neoplasms such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative strategy for both conditions, massive splenomegaly frequently observed in patients with myelofibrosis is considered to be a risk factor for graft failure or engraftment delay after transplantation. A proportion of patients can benefit from splenectomy before transplantation but such procedures have been associated with substantial surgical morbidity. Here, we report two elderly patients with myelofibrosis who received scheduled splenic irradiation for massive splenomegaly immediately prior to allogeneic HSCT instead of undergoing splenectomy. The first patient was a 60-year-old woman who received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis from an HLA-identical sibling; the second patient was a 60-year-old man who received unrelated bone marrow transplantation for primary myelofibrosis. After receiving fractionated splenic irradiation and fludarabine-based reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, these patients showed remarkable reduction of their splenomegaly at the time of transplantation. They attained successful donor cell engraftment without severe complications related to splenic irradiation, while improvement in splenomegaly was durable. Our experience suggests that splenic irradiation before allogeneic HSCT might be a safe and effective alternative to splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with massive splenomegaly in terms of reducing the risk of surgical morbidity.

Myelofibrosis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by symptoms mainly derived from anemia and splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms and associated with a median survival around 6 years. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the only curative therapy of MF but is applicable to a minority of patients. Discovery of the JAK2 mutation has provided the basis for the introduction of a new class of drugs, the JAK inhibitors, in the treatment of MF.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review on the therapy of MF has been performed through a PubMed search, with special attention being paid to the available data on transplantation, the JAK inhibitors, and other new drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional therapy of MF is usually adjusted to the predominant clinical symptoms in each patient, and its impact on survival is limited. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have increased the number of patients eligible for allo-SCT, but this procedure is still associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, can achieve profound symptomatic relief of the splenomegaly and the constitutional symptoms. However, they often accentuate the anemia and do not reduce the JAK2 allele burden, therefore lacking the potential to modify the natural history of MF.

The evolving treatment paradigm in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm diagnosed de novo or developed from essential thrombocythemia (ET) or polycythemia vera (PV). Average survival of a patient with MF is 5-7 years. Disease complications include fatigue, early satiety, pruritus, painful splenic infarcts, infections and leukemic transformation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for MF, but carries a risk of treatment-related mortality and is reserved for the few high-risk patients fit enough to endure the procedure. Other traditional therapies are palliative and supported by few randomized, controlled trials; thus, novel treatment strategies are needed. Discovery of the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gain-of-function mutation, JAK2V617F, in the majority (50-60%) of patients with MF led to increased understanding of the biology underlying MF and the development of JAK2 inhibitors to treat MF. Recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the first JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, signaled a new era for treatment of MF. Additional JAK2 inhibitors, such as SAR302503, may become commercially available in the near future, and their distinct pharmacologic and efficacy profiles will help determine their use across the patient population. Data on JAK2 inhibitors, their role in an evolving treatment paradigm, and future directions for treatment of MF are discussed.

Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis

The aim of the present study was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). The Cochrane databases, PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published up to October 2012. Randomised controlled trials assessing ruxolitinib versus a placebo or the best available therapy in patients with MF were included. Two trials randomised 528 patients with MF to ruxolitinib versus a placebo or ruxolitinib versus the best available therapy. Compared with the placebo, ruxolitinib had a significant beneficial effect on the proportion of patients that had a reduction in spleen volume of ≥35% at 24 weeks [odds ratio (OR), 109.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 14.97–804.78] or an increased overall survival rate (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 0.99–4.12). Ruxolitinib significantly increased the risk of several non-haematological or haematological adverse events, but not the risk of treatment discontinuations (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.50–2.14). Compared with the best available therapy, ruxolitinib had a significant beneficial effect on the proportion of patients that had a reduction in spleen volume of ≥35% at 24 (OR, 68.45; 95% CI, 4.15–1129.19) or 48 weeks (OR, 56.20; 95%CI, 3.40–928.67). Ruxolitinib once again significantly increased the risk of several non-haematological adverse events, serious adverse events and dose reductions or interruptions (OR, 9.60; 95% CI, 4.66–19.81), but not the risk of treatment discontinuations (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.48–4.97). In conclusion, based on the trials included in the present study, the use of ruxolitinib is beneficial in the treatment of MF.

Splenomegaly in myelofibrosis--new options for therapy and the therapeutic potential of Janus kinase 2 inhibitors

Splenomegaly is a common sign of primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF), and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF) that is associated with bothersome symptoms, which have a significant negative impact on patients’ quality of life. It may also be present in patients with advanced polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Until recently, none of the therapies used to treat MF were particularly effective in reducing splenomegaly. The discovery of an activating Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) activating mutation (JAK2V617F) that is present in almost all patients with PV and in about 50-60 % of patients with ET and PMF led to the initiation of several trials investigating the clinical effectiveness of various JAK2 (or JAK1/JAK2) inhibitors for the treatment of patients with ET, PV, and MF. Some of these trials have documented significant clinical benefit of JAK inhibitors, particularly in terms of regression of splenomegaly. In November 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the JAK1- and JAK2-selective inhibitor ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including PMF, post-PV MF, and post-ET MF. This review discusses current therapeutic options for splenomegaly associated with primary or secondary MF and the treatment potential of the JAK inhibitors in this setting.

Splenic irradiation-induced gastric variceal bleeding in a primary splenic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient: a rare complication successfully treated by splenectomy with short gastric vein ligation

Primary splenic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare clinical condition, which is generally treated by six to eight cycles of chemotherapy involving a combination of rituximab and the cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP) regimen. However, the treatment for chemorefractory primary splenic DLBCL remains controversial. Therapeutic splenic irradiation (SI) might be a reasonable and possibly the only treatment option with curative intention for patients with chemorefractory primary splenic DLBCL. However, the efficacy and safety of therapeutic SI are unclear. Herein, we present the case of a primary splenic DLBCL patient who was refractory to multiple chemotherapy regimens but achieved complete remission after administration of therapeutic SI. However, his condition was complicated with severe gastric variceal bleeding due to splenic venous thrombosis, which was successfully treated via splenectomy and short gastric vein ligation. On the basis of our findings, we concluded that the splenic venous thrombosis-induced gastric variceal bleeding was a rare but life-threatening adverse effect of the therapeutic SI administered for primary splenic DLBCL. Surgical intervention involving splenectomy and short gastric vein ligation is mandatory and should be performed as soon as possible for such patients.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant for myelofibrosis patients over age 60: likely impact of the JAK2 inhibitors

The myeloproliferative neoplasm, myelofibrosis (MF), has only one therapeutic intervention that is potentially curative in these individuals, specifically that of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ASCT has been utilized up to this juncture, primarily in younger individuals with higher risk disease. There is more limited data on outcomes in individuals over the age of 60 years. The choice of an individualized therapeutic intervention for a patient with MF is a very complex issue and is dependent on several factors. The first factor being their overall prognosis with their illness (which can vary from a median of 2 years in high-risk patients to over 10 years in low-risk patients) and the potential impact of a therapeutic intervention not only on survival but also on quality of life. Current available therapies have been strictly palliative for disease-associated anemia and/or splenomegaly. At present, we have a new generation of inhibitors of JAK2 (Ruxolitinib, CYT387, SB1518, TG101348, with others in development), which have been shown to improve splenomegaly, improve symptomatic burden of illness and improve quality of life. In addition, these inhibitors of JAK2 may have an impact on the natural history of MF, but confirmation of the presence and degree of this impact is still pending. Clinical availability of JAK2 inhibitors may alter the timing of transplant in marginal transplant candidates (that is, those over the age of 60), may have a role preceding ASCT to improve spleen size and performance status before transplant and might be frontline therapy in intermediate and high-risk patients who are not candidates for ASCT.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: its clinical potential

Ruxolitinib is an orally bioavailable, selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), a bone marrow disease in which the JAK pathway is dysregulated, leading to impaired hematopoiesis and immune function. By inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2, ruxolitinib modulates cytokine-stimulated intracellular signaling. In a phase II clinical trial in patients with MF, ruxolitinib recipients exhibited durable reductions in spleen size, reductions in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, improvements in physical activity, weight gain, and alleviation of symptoms (including constitutional symptoms) in patients with and without JAK2 mutation. These findings were confirmed by two phase III clinical MF studies, in which a greater proportion of ruxolitinib recipients achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline at week 24, compared with placebo in one study (41.9% versus 0.7%; P < 0.0001) and with best available therapy in the other (31.9% versus 0%; P < 0.0001). Alleviation of MF symptoms and improvements in quality of life were also significantly greater in ruxolitinib recipients. Overall survival of patients treated with ruxolitinib was significantly longer than of those receiving the placebo. Owing to risks of potentially serious adverse effects, eg, myelosuppression, ruxolitinib should be used under close physician supervision. Longer follow-up of the phase III MF studies is needed to reach firm conclusions regarding ruxolitinib’s capacity to modify the natural disease course.

How I treat splenomegaly in myelofibrosis

Symptomatic splenomegaly, a frequent manifestation of myelofibrosis (MF), represents a therapeutic challenge. It is frequently accompanied by constitutional symptoms and by anemia or other cytopenias, which make treatment difficult, as the latter are often worsened by most current therapies. Cytoreductive treatment, usually hydroxyurea, is the first-line therapy, being effective in around 40% of the patients, although the effect is often short lived. The immunomodulatory drugs, such as thalidomide or lenalidomide, rarely show a substantial activity in reducing the splenomegaly. Splenectomy can be considered in patients refractory to drug treatment, but the procedure involves substantial morbidity as well as a certain mortality risk and, therefore, patient selection is important. For patients not eligible for splenectomy, transient relief of the symptoms can be obtained with local radiotherapy that, in turn, can induce severe and long-lasting cytopenias. Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only treatment with the potential for curing MF but, due to its associated morbidity and mortality, is usually restricted to a minority of patients with poor risk features. A new class of drugs, the JAK2 inhibitors, although also palliative, are promising in the splenomegaly of MF and will probably change the therapeutic algorithm of this disease.

Low dose palliative radiotherapy for splenomegaly in hematologic disorders

Splenomegaly (SM) is a common complication in hematologic disorders often associated with hypersplenism, and may cause pain, epigastric discomfort and variable systemic effects due to cytopenias. We retrospectively evaluated the results of palliative splenic irradiation (PSI) in terms of symptomatic relief in patients with hematologic disorders. In 1998-2006, 32 patients with hematologic disorders (median age 57) received 52 courses of PSI for SM. Twenty-one patients (66%) were diagnosed with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD), five patients (16%) had malignant lymphoma (ML), five patients (16%) had chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and one patient (3%) had hairy cell leukemia. Splenomegaly was accompanied by pain, anemia, thrombocytopenia and cachexia. Radiation therapy to the entire spleen was delivered by two parallel opposed fields using 0.5 Gy daily fractions given 5 days per week to a total dose of 6-10 Gy. PSI resulted in splenic size reduction in 78.8%, improvement of anemia in 75% and improvement of thrombocytopenia in 63.5% of PSI courses. The median survival (MS) of patients with MPD, CLL and ML was 45, 10 and 5 months, respectively. The MS of responders to PSI versus non-responders was 45 and 16 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.17; p = 0.03; 95% confidence interval 0.035-0.84). In our hands, low dose PSI provided effective palliation for patients with hematologic disorders with SM. Splenic re-irradiation was feasible without excessive toxicity.