Ratio of factor V activities in PT and APTT assays as a new diagnostic marker of lupus anticoagulant

Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) employed in classification, and by default diagnosis, of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Detection of LA is not via calibrated assays but is based on functional behavior of the antibodies in a medley of coagulation assays. A prolonged clotting time in a screening test is followed by demonstration of phospholipid dependence and inhibitory properties in confirmatory and mixing tests, respectively, which are modifications of the parent screening test. Complications arise because no single screening test is sensitive to every LA, and no test is specific for LA, because they are prone to interference by other causes of elevated clotting times. Several screening tests are available but the pairing of dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) with LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is widely used and recommended because it is proven to have good detection rates. Nonetheless, judicious use of other assays can improve diagnostic performance, such as dilute prothrombin time to find LA unreactive with dRVVT and aPTT, and the recently validated Taipan snake venom time with ecarin time confirmatory test that are unaffected by vitamin K antagonist and direct factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulation. Expert body guidelines and their updates have improved harmonization of laboratory practices, although some issues continue to attract debate, such as the place of mixing tests in the medley hierarchy, and areas of data manipulation such as assay cut-offs and ratio generation. This article reviews current practices and challenges in the laboratory detection of LA.

The antiphospholipid syndrome: what are we really measuring? How do we measure it? And how do we treat it?

The antiphospholipid syndrome is described with a review of its historical development as a recognized syndrome, what constitutes an antiphospholipid antibody, how it is measured, and how the syndrome is treated. Antiphospholipid antibodies are actually antibodies to a protein, most often beta-2-glycoprotein 1, that is usually bound to a phospholipid. Some antibodies are directed towards lipid-bound prothrombin. The antibodies are measured by immunologic assays or by antibody-dependent abnormalities detected in coagulation assays. Although they prolong coagulation assays, they are associated with a thrombotic tendency rather than a bleeding disorder. There are numerous postulated mechanisms to account for the thrombotic tendency. Patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome are treated with long-term oral anticoagulation to prolong the INR to 2.0 to 3.0. For most patients, a more intense level of treatment with a higher INR is not needed.

Prothrombin time inhibition detected with recombinant but not with conventional thromboplastins in two patients with high-titre IgM and moderate-titre IgA anticardiolipin antibodies

We report two cases of high-titre IgM and moderate-titre IgA anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) in whom prothrombin times (PT) derived using recombinant thromboplastins (rTP) were prolonged but were normal when measured with conventional thromboplastins. The anticoagulant nature of these antibodies cannot be categorized as the classical lupus type. We suggest that routine screening for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) should be performed in patients who fall into this category.

Lupus anticoagulant testing with optical end point automation

The dilute Russell viper venom time and kaolin clotting time (KCT) are very sensitive screening tests for lupus anticoagulant activity. However, due to the high turbidity of the kaolin reagent it is difficult to accommodate the KCT on the optical end point automation of today. We evaluated five recently reported screening tests (the silica clotting time, the Textarin/Ecarin ratio, the Taipan venom time, the factor V ratio, and a kaolin clotting time using low-turbidity kaolin) as potential alternatives to the KCT. The sensitivity and specificity of the silica clotting time compared well to KCT, detecting 10/12 KCT positive samples and showing equal sensitivity to dilution of lupus positive plasma. In addition, the silica clotting time allows for a confirmatory phospholipid correction procedure. False-positive results were seen in 2 of 15 warfarinised samples. A second assay utilising the ratio of extrinsic/intrinsic factor V assays was not affected by either warfarin or heparin. This assay also gave positive results with 3 of 23 samples previously screened as lupus negative but exhibiting anticardiolipin positivity. It was therefore concluded that a combination of the silica clotting time and dilute Russell viper venom time met the requirements of lupus sensitivity with demonstration of phospholipid dependence and optical end point compatibility. The factor V ratio is a useful second-line screen for both anticoagulated patients and anticardiolipin antibody-positive samples.