Optimal dosage interval for depot somatostatin analogue therapy in acromegaly requires individual titration

Surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma is a severe endocrine disease. Surgery is the currently recommended primary therapy for patients with GH-secreting tumours. However, non-surgical therapy (pharmacological therapy and radiation therapy) may be performed as primary therapy or may improve surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 1 August 2022. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of more than 12 weeks' duration, reporting on surgical, pharmacological, radiation, and combination interventions for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in any healthcare setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, screened for inclusion, completed data extraction, and performed a risk of bias assessment. We assessed studies for overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. We expressed results as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, or in descriptive format when meta-analysis was not possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs that evaluated 445 adults with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Four studies reported that they included participants with macroadenomas, one study included a small number of participants with microadenomas. The remaining studies did not specify tumour subtypes. Studies evaluated surgical therapy alone, pharmacological therapy alone, or combination surgical and pharmacological therapy. Methodological quality varied, with many studies providing insufficient information to compare treatment strategies or accurately judge the risk of bias. We identified two main comparisons, surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy alone, and surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy and surgery combined. Surgical therapy alone versus pharmacological therapy alone Three studies with a total of 164 randomised participants investigated this comparison. Only one study narratively described hyperglycaemia as a disease-related complication. All three studies reported adverse events, yet only one study reported numbers separately for the intervention arms; none of the 11 participants were observed to develop gallbladder stones or sludge on ultrasonography following surgery, while five of 11 participants experienced any biliary problems following pharmacological therapy (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.47; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Health-related quality of life was reported to improve similarly in both intervention arms during follow-up. Surgery alone compared to pharmacological therapy alone may slightly increase the biochemical remission rate from 12 weeks to one year after intervention, but the evidence is very uncertain; 36/78 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 15/66 in the pharmacological therapy group showed biochemical remission. The need for additional surgery or non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease was described for single study arms only. Surgical therapy alone versus preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery Five studies with a total of 281 randomised participants provided data for this comparison. Preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may have little to no effect on the disease-related complication of a difficult intubation (requiring postponement of surgery) compared to surgery alone, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.19 to 21.34; 1 study, 98 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Surgery alone may have little to no effect on (transient and persistent) adverse events when compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery, but again, the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.03; 5 studies, 267 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Concerning biochemical remission, surgery alone compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may not increase remission rates up until 16 weeks after surgery; 23 of 134 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 51 of 133 in the preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery group showed biochemical remission. Furthermore, the very low-certainty evidence did not suggest benefit or detriment of preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery compared to surgery alone for the outcomes 'requiring additional surgery' (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.06; 1 study, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or 'non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease' (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.28; 2 studies, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies measured health-related quality of life. None of the eight included studies measured disease recurrence or socioeconomic effects. While three of the eight studies reported no deaths to have occurred, one study mentioned that overall, two participants had died within five years of the start of the study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, patient-relevant outcomes, such as disease-related complications, adverse events and disease recurrence were not, or only sparsely, reported. When reported, we found that surgery may have little or no effect on the outcomes compared to the comparator treatment. The current evidence is limited by the small number of included studies, as well as the unclear risk of bias in most studies. The high uncertainty of evidence significantly limits the applicability of our findings to clinical practice. Detailed reporting on the burden of recurrent disease is an important knowledge gap to be evaluated in future research studies. It is also crucial that future studies in this area are designed to report on outcomes by tumour subtype (that is, macroadenomas versus microadenomas) so that future subgroup analyses can be conducted. More rigorous and larger studies, powered to address these research questions, are required to assess the merits of neoadjuvant pharmacological therapy or first-line pharmacotherapy.

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands).

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.

Somatostatin analogues in acromegaly and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: past, present and future

Acromegaly is a hormonal disorder that arises when the pituitary gland secretes excess growth hormone (GH), which in turn stimulates a concomitant increase in serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours that can secrete serotonin and a variety of peptide hormones that may cause characteristic symptoms known as carcinoid syndrome or other symptoms and hormonal hypersecretion syndromes depending on the tumour's site of origin. Current medical therapy for the treatment of acromegaly and GEP-NET involves the administration of somatostatin analogues that effectively suppress excess hormone secretion. After its discovery in 1979, octreotide became the first synthetic biologically stable somatostatin analogue with a short-acting formulation of octreotide introduced into clinical practice in the late 1980s. Lanreotide, another somatostatin analogue, became available in the mid-1990s initially as a prolonged-release formulation administered every 10 or 14 days. Long-acting release formulations of both octreotide (Sandostatin LAR and Novartis) and lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel, Ipsen), based on microparticle and nanoparticle drug-delivery technologies, respectively, were later developed, which allowed for once-monthly administration and improved convenience. First-generation somatostatin analogues remain one of the cornerstones of medical therapy in the management of pituitary and GEP-NET hormone hypersecretion, with octreotide having the longest established efficacy and safety profile of the somatostatin analogue class. More recently, pasireotide (Signifor), a next-generation multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue, has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of acromegaly. This review summarizes the development and clinical success of somatostatin analogues.

Octreotide for acromegaly treatment: a reappraisal

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disorder characterized by excess secretion of growth hormone (GH) generally caused by a pituitary macroadenoma and associated with reduced life expectancy if the disease is untreated. This article covers the recent available evidences published on octreotide , the first somatostatin analog introduced into clinical practice for the medical treatment of acromegaly.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses i) pharmacology of somatostatin and octreotide; ii) biochemical effects of regular octreotide and long-acting repeatable formulation; iii) tumor shrinkage effects of octreotide in acromegaly; iv) impact of octreotide on acromegalic clinical manifestations and chronic complications; v) safety of octreotide and vi) place of octreotide in the guidelines for acromegaly treatment. Full-text articles in the English language were selected from a PubMed search spanning 1984 - 2013, for keywords including 'octreotide,' 'acromegaly,' 'GH,' 'IGF-I,' and 'tumor shrinkage.' Reference lists in selected papers were also used to broaden the search.

EXPERT OPINION

Octreotide is a mature drug with a consolidated favorable benefit versus risks profile in the treatment of acromegaly.

Long-Acting Octreotide and Prolonged-Release Lanreotide Formulations Have Different Pharmacokinetic Profiles

Single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and multiple-dose PK modeling were compared for long-acting octreotide (20 or 60 mg) and prolonged-release lanreotide (90 or 120 mg) over 91 days; steady-state profiles were simulated. All treatments were well tolerated. Octreotide 20-mg profile showed increased concentration on day 1, lag from days 2 to 6, then prolonged plateau phase (days 11-41); 60-mg PK was dose proportional. Lanreotide 90-mg profile showed C(max) on day 1 then elimination (apparent t1/2 25.5 days); 120-mg profile was underproportional. Steady-state PK of octreotide 20 mg/28 d suggested a C(mean) of 1216 rhog/mL (range, 1065-1585) with low fluctuation index (43%). Steady-state PK of lanreotide 90 mg/28 d suggested a C(mean) of 4455 rhog/mL (range, 2499-9279) with high fluctuation index (152%). Long-acting octreotide had more predictable PK than prolonged-release lanreotide. Simulated steady-state profiles suggest long-acting octreotide could be optimized to meet individual patient needs. In contrast, prolonged-release lanreotide requires exposure constantly above the therapeutic target to enable monthly long-term therapy.

Clinical efficacy and safety results for dose escalation of somatostatin receptor ligands in patients with acromegaly: a literature review

Acromegaly is a rare disease with a multifaceted clinical presentation. In 90-95% of patients with acromegaly, the disease is caused by a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma with elevated GH levels that ultimately induce excessive hepatic secretion of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are considered the standard medical choice for the treatment of acromegaly, and normalization of GH and IGF-1 is attainable with effective therapy. This review aims to summarize the literature relative to SRL dose escalation therapy in patients with acromegaly. A United States National Library of Medicine PubMed search of SRL's was conducted using the following search terms: ((((LAR) OR ATG) OR octreotide) OR lanreotide Autogel) AND acromegaly. Related articles in non peer-reviewed journals were excluded. The rationale and benefits of SRL dose optimization therapy were investigated with emphasis on describing the clinical recognition, treatment, and management of patients with acromegaly. We found that dose escalation could provide additional biochemical control of acromegaly in patients who are inadequately controlled with conventional starting doses of octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(®). Furthermore, patients should routinely have their GH and IGF-1 levels closely monitored and their SRL dose increased or decreased thereafter according to individual response.

The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome

The Endocrine Tumor Summit convened in December 2008 to address 6 statements prepared by panel members that reflect important questions in the treatment of acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome. Data pertinent to each of the statements were identified through review of pertinent literature by one of the 9-member panel, enabling a critical evaluation of the statements and the evidence supporting or refuting them. Three statements addressed the validity of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations as indicators or predictors of disease in acromegaly. Statements regarding the effects of preoperative somatostatin analog use on pituitary surgical outcomes, their effects on hormone and symptom control in carcinoid syndrome, and the efficacy of extended dosing intervals were reviewed. Panel opinions, based on the level of available scientific evidence, were polled. Finally, their views were compared with those of surveyed community-based endocrinologists and neurosurgeons.

Management of acromegaly in Latin America: expert panel recommendations

Although there are international guidelines orienting physicians on how to manage patients with acromegaly, such guidelines should be adapted for use in distinct regions of the world. A panel of neuroendocrinologists convened in Mexico City in August of 2007 to discuss specific considerations in Latin America. Of major discussion was the laboratory evaluation of acromegaly, which requires the use of appropriate tests and the adoption of local institutional standards. As a general rule to ensure diagnosis, the patient's GH level during an oral glucose tolerance test and IGF-1 level should be evaluated. Furthermore, to guide treatment decisions, both GH and IGF-1 assessments are required. The treatment of patients with acromegaly in Latin America is influenced by local issues of cost, availability and expertise of pituitary neurosurgeons, which should dictate therapeutic choices. Such treatment has undergone profound changes because of the introduction of effective medical interventions that may be used after surgical debulking or as first-line medical therapy in selected cases. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy for small pituitary adenomas (microadenomas), potentially resectable macroadenomas and invasive adenomas causing visual defects. Radiotherapy may be indicated in selected cases when no disease control is achieved despite optimal surgical debulking and medical therapy, when there is no access to somatostatin analogues, or when local issues of cost preclude other therapies. Since not all the diagnostic tools and treatment options are available in all Latin American countries, physicians need to adapt their clinical management decisions to the available local resources and therapeutic options.

Octreotide LAR: safety and tolerability issues

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues are the cornerstone in therapy of acromegaly and functioning neuroendocrine tumors. Long-acting retard formulations have improved patient survival and contributed considerably to quality of life. The first such compound was octreotide LAR ('long-acting release'), characterized by high affinity to somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5, which has to be injected intramuscularly every 4 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to screen all octreotide LAR-related literature and assess the compound's profile for safety and tolerability.

METHODS

An extensive literature search has been performed using the MEDLINE database to retrieve data from clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of octreotide LAR.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Octreotide LAR is well tolerated; however, diarrhea and gallstone formation were identified as the main adverse events. Impairment of glucose homeostasis was a regular phenomenon, but its occurrence was unpredictable. General side effects such as headache, abdominal discomfort or fatigue were also reported. According to incidental case reports, administration during pregnancy appears to be safe for both mother and child; however, definitive evidence is missing. In addition, octreotide LAR has been evaluated for further indications including treatment of solid tumor entities, due to its antiproliferative effect. Currently, several compounds (lanreotide, SOM230) with a broader receptor spectrum are under evaluation and may improve treatment efficacy and lower incidence of side effects.

From somatostatin to octreotide LAR: evolution of a somatostatin analogue

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is characterized by overproduction of growth hormone (GH) by the pituitary gland. GH stimulates the synthesis of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and the somatic growth and metabolic dysfunction that characterize acromegaly are a consequence of elevated GH and IGF-I levels. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms that have usually metastasized by the time of diagnosis. The majority of GEP-NETs are carcinoid tumors whose syndrome is caused by the hypersecretion of biogenic amines, peptides and polypeptides responsible for the principal symptoms of diarrhea and flushing.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for preclinical and clinical studies of octreotide (Sandostatin* ), a potent synthetic somatostatin analogue, in patients with acromegaly or GEP-NETs.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the 20 years of clinical experience with octreotide and the impact it has made in patients with acromegaly or GEP-NETs.

RESULTS

Octreotide has proven to be an essential component in the management strategy of acromegaly and GEP-NETs over the past 20 years. The multiple beneficial effects of octreotide throughout the body, combined with its established safety profile (the most common adverse effects are injection-site pain and gastrointestinal events), have made it an appealing option for clinicians. The advent of the long-acting release (LAR) formulation of octreotide provided additional benefits to patients through monthly administration, while maintaining the efficacy and tolerability profile of the daily subcutaneous formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide is a potent synthetic somatostatin analogue that has become the mainstay of medical therapy for tumor control in neuroendocrine disorders such as acromegaly and GEP-NETs. The development of octreotide LAR offered a further advancement; less frequent dosing provided valuable benefits in quality of life to patients, with equivalent efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, recent results from the PROMID study have confirmed the antiproliferative effect of octreotide LAR in patients with well-differentiated metastatic GEP-NETs of the midgut. New therapeutic uses of octreotide are currently under investigation in a variety of clinical settings.

Octreotide-LAR vs lanreotide-SR as first-line therapy for acromegaly: a retrospective, comparative, head-to-head study

No head-to-head comparisons are available to analyze the efficacy of octreotide (LAR) and lanreotide (LAN) as first-line treatment of acromegaly.We compared the efficacy of these two drugs in 54 newly diagnosed patients (21 women, 33 men), 27 treated with LAR (10-30 mg every 28 days) and 27 with LAN (60-90 mg/28 days), for 12 months. Each LAR-treated patient was matched with one LAN-treated patient as for GH levels, sex, and age (+/-5 yr). Outcome measures were GH and IGF-I levels and tumor shrinkage and secondarily classical cardiovascular risk factors (total/HDL-cholesterol ratio, glucose tolerance), blood pressure and drug tolerability. In LAR- and in LAN-treated patients, respectively: GH and IGF-I were controlled in 21 (77.7%) and in 16 patients (59.3%; p=0.26); tumor shrinkage was absent (<25%) in 4 and 5 patients (p=1), mild (25.1-50%) in 9 and 12 (p=0.57), moderate (50.1-75%) in 10 and 6 (p=0.37) and notable (>75%) in 4 and 4 patients (p=1). The total/HDL-cholesterol ratio and insulin levels significantly decreased while glucose levels significantly increased in both groups. None of the patients with normal glucose tolerance at diagnosis developed diabetes mellitus. Side effects were mostly at the gastrointestinal level and were similar with both drugs. In conclusion, newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly treated with LAR and LAN have no significantly different prevalence of disease control, tumor shrinkage, improvement of cardiovascular risk markers and side effects. Therefore, both drugs can be safely employed as first-line therapy of acromegaly.

Octreotide LAR for the treatment of acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogs previously considered as adjuvant therapy in acromegaly are increasingly used as a first-line therapy in selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

To review the octreotide LAR pharmacological and clinical data, and discuss the impact of this agent on current treatment regimens.

METHODS

We reviewed PubMed publications since the first use of octreotide LAR in acromegaly, and historical articles related to the discovery and development of this molecule. We chose, for efficacy and safety data, reviews, clinical and randomized controlled trials that included >or=10 patients.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Octreotide LAR controls acromegaly in approximately 50-60% of patients by inhibiting GH and IGF-I secretion, and by reducing tumor size. This drug is well tolerated in most patients.

Control of IGF-I levels with titrated dosing of lanreotide Autogel over 48 weeks in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND

An essential criterion for control of acromegaly is normalization of IGF-I levels. Somatostatin analogues act to suppress IGF-I and GH levels.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of 48 weeks titrated dosing of lanreotide Autogel.

DESIGN

Open-label, multicentre, phase III, 48-week trial.

METHODS

Patients with active acromegaly (IGF-I levels > 1.3 times upper limit of age-adjusted normal range) were recruited. Twelve injections of lanreotide Autogel were given at 28-day intervals: during the 16-week fixed-dose phase, patients received 90 mg; in the 32-week dose-titration phase, patients received 60, 90 or 120 mg according to GH and IGF-I levels. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine the proportion of patients with normalized age-adjusted IGF-I levels at study end. Secondary evaluations included GH levels, clinical acromegaly signs and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven of 63 patients completed the study. Lanreotide Autogel resulted in normalized age-adjusted IGF-I levels in 27 patients (43%, 95% CI 31-55). Mean GH levels decreased from 6.2 to 1.5 microg/l at study end, with 53 of 62 patients (85%) having GH levels < or = 2.5 microg/l (95% CI 76.7-94.3) and 28 of 62 patients (45%) with levels < 1 microg/l (95% CI 32.8-57.6). Twenty-four (38%) had both normal IGF-I levels and GH levels < or = 2.5 microg/l. Acromegaly symptoms reduced significantly in most patients throughout the study. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, as expected for somatostatin analogues.

CONCLUSIONS

Using IGF-I as primary end-point, 48 weeks lanreotide Autogel treatment, titrated for optimal hormonal control, controlled IGF-I and GH levels effectively, reduced acromegaly symptoms and was well tolerated.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

Optimalization and cost management of lanreotide-Autogel therapy in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Lanreotide-Autogel is a depot formulation of the somatostatin analog lanreotide used in the treatment of acromegaly. We investigated whether prolonging or shortening the interval between injections would offer any benefit.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The interval was prolonged from once every 4 weeks to once every 6 weeks when patients (n=9) had normal IGF-I and GH concentrations. When patients (n=12) had still elevated IGF-I or GH on the maximal dose of 120 mg every 4 weeks, the interval was shortened to once every 3 weeks. Serum IGF-I and GH were measured after 12 and 24 weeks to allow for dose adaptation. Symptoms and tumor volume were evaluated at baseline and after 36 weeks.

RESULTS

In seven of the nine subjects with normal IGF-I and GH, the interval could be extended to 6 weeks without loosing efficacy on IGF-I (195 vs 213 microg/l; not significant, NS) and GH concentrations (1.4 vs 1.3 microg/l; NS). The weekly dose could significantly be reduced (from 23.3 to 17.8 mg; P=0.002). In only 1 of the 12 not-controlled patients, reducing the interval to once every 3 weeks induced normalization of IGF-I and GH.

CONCLUSION

In subjects whose acromegaly is well controlled using lanreotide-Autogel, prolonging the time interval between injections can often be increased 4 to 6 weeks without loss of efficacy, thereby improving the subject's comfort and reducing the cost of treatment. On the other hand, in subjects whose acromegaly is not controlled on a dose of 120 mg every 4 weeks, reducing the interval to every 3 weeks is rarely beneficial.

Efficacy of a slow-release formulation of lanreotide (Autogel) 120 mg) in patients with acromegaly previously treated with octreotide long acting release (LAR): an open, multicentre longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg (ATG120; Ipsen S.p.A, Milan, Italy) is a high-dose, sustained-release aqueous gel formulation, supplied in a prefilled syringe and given by deep subcutaneous injection. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of ATG120 given every 4-8 weeks with those of octreotide LAR (o-LAR) given every 4 weeks. DESIGN PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A phase III multicentre Italian open clinical study of 23 acromegalic patients (15 female, 8 male). All patients had received o-LAR for 6-18 months and, after 3 months wash out, ATG120 was given every 6 weeks for a total of four injections (Period 1). Then the interval between ATG120 injections was adjusted according to three different schemes: every 4, 6 or 8 weeks depending on GH levels (GH > 2.5 microg/l; 1 < GH <or= 2.5 microg/l; GH <or= 1 microg/l, respectively). ATG120 was given for a further two to three doses, with a final assessment (Period 2) at Week 34, 36 or 42.

MEASUREMENTS

Hormonal (GH and IGF-I) and clinical efficacy and tolerability.

RESULTS

ATG120 induced a significant GH decrease from 9.9 +/- 11.3 at baseline (Visit 1) to 3.5 +/- 5.7 at the end of Period 1 (P < 0.01) and to 3.8 +/- 5.7 microg/l at the final visit (P < 0.01). IGF-I also decreased from 544 +/- 312 at baseline (Visit 1) to 318 +/- 181 at Period 1 and to 356 +/- 187 microg/l at the final visit (both P < 0.05 vs. baseline). The frequency of ATG120 administrations was adjusted to every 4 weeks in 12 patients, every 6 weeks in 4 patients and every 8 weeks in 6 patients; 1 patient withdrew before the dose adjustment. Serum GH and IGF-I achieved at the end of Period 1 and Period 2 were similar to those reached with o-LAR. The number of patients who achieved GH < 2.5 microg/l was comparable between o-LAR (43%) and ATG120 at Period 1 (48%) and at Period 2 (62%). Normal IGF-I levels were recorded in 8 patients during o-LAR (35%), 11 during ATG Period 1 (48%) and 10 at the final visit (43%). Last, 4 patients showed a better response to ATG120 and 2 to o-LAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for acromegaly. In approximately half of patients ATG120 may be administered every 6-8 weeks, instead of every 4 weeks, without lost of efficacy.

Octreotide for acromegaly

Octreotide has dramatically changed the results of medical treatment of acromegaly. It is the reference drug for the pharmacological treatment of acromegaly, owing to its impressive efficacy in suppressing growth hormome secretion, and excellent compliance. Safe growth hormone and normal insulin-like growth factor I values are reached in 50-60% of unselected patients. Octreotide arrests the growth of the tumor and shrinks tumor in over half of all patients (namely, up to 88% of naive patients and to complete disappearance in anecdotic cases). The safety profile of octreotide is excellent, but in some patients, glucose metabolism worsens and cholelythiasis occurs. This review will address the primary treatment and the relative roles of pharmacological and surgical treatment, as well as the predictivity of octreotide results.

Current pharmacotherapy for acromegaly: a review

Acromegaly is associated with considerable morbidity and excess mortality; however, after effective treatment, both morbidity and mortality risks improve. Growth hormone excess in acromegaly can be controlled in many patients by pharmacotherapy alone, and with a combination of transsphenoidal surgery and pharmacotherapy in almost all patients. Since the clinical introduction of pegvisomant, a growth hormone-receptor antagonist, the role of radiotherapy is restricted. This review focuses on the treatment options for acromegaly (e.g., surgery, radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy with the depot preparations of the somatostatin analogues octreotide long-acting release formulation, lanreotide slow-release formulation and lanreotide Autogel, the growth hormone antagonist pegvisomant and the dopamine agonist cabergoline). Pharmacological characteristics of these drugs and the clinical and adverse effects are discussed individually and in relation to the other treatment modalities. The evidence for biochemical goals aimed at during medical treatment and the costs of pharmacotherapy are discussed. A new treatment algorithm is proposed, in which the choice between primary medical treatment and primary surgery is individualised, dependent on adenoma size and extension, patient factors (age, preference for therapy, contraindication for surgery), surgical experience of the centre and octreotide sensitivity of the adenoma. The high cost of lifelong medical treatment, especially of pegvisomant, must be weighed against the cost of a single surgical procedure.

Predicting Therapeutic Response and Degree of Pituitary Tumour Shrinkage during Treatment of Acromegaly with Octreotide LAR

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The efficacy of transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of patients with acromegaly is largely dependent on tumour size. A reduction in pituitary tumour volume by medical therapy might therefore improve subsequent surgical cure rates. This study prospectively determined the effects of the depot somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR on pituitary tumour size, GH and IGF-I levels and clinical symptoms in a cohort of previously untreated patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Six patients newly diagnosed with acromegaly (mean age 53 years; range 42-76 years) received intramuscular octreotide LAR every 28 days for 6 months. The initial dose of LAR was 20 mg, but increased to 30 mg after the initial 3 injections if mean GH levels were >5 mU/l. Prior to commencing LAR therapy, each patient received 3 injections of subcutaneous octreotide (50, 100 and 200 mug) in a randomized order on separate days, and the serum GH response was measured. Pituitary tumour volume was calculated from MRI or computed tomography scans at baseline, then 3 and 6 months after initiation of treatment, and assessed by a 'blinded' radiologist in random order. At baseline, 4 patients had a macroadenoma and 2 patients had a microadenoma. For the latter, the whole gland volume was measured.

RESULTS

Serum GH levels decreased from 29.6 +/- 19.2 mU/l (mean +/- SD) at baseline to 12.1 +/- 10.5 mU/l at 3 months and 10.4 +/- 9.3 mU/l at 6 months. Three patients achieved a mean serum GH level of <5 mU/l. In these patients, the serum GH had declined to <5 mU/l in response to a single 100 mug subcutaneous octreotide injection. Serum IGF-I levels decreased by a mean of 45 +/- 7.4%. Tumour volume decreased in all patients: mean baseline volume 2,175 mm(3) (range 660-6,998) decreasing to 1,567 mm(3) (range 360-4,522) at 3 months (p < 0.05) and 1,293 mm(3) (range 280-4,104) at 6 months (p < 0.002). The mean percentage decrease in size was 29% (range -54 to +4%) at 3 months (p < 0.02) and 47% (range 21-97%) at 6 months (p < 0.002). There was no statistically significant correlation between GH response and tumour shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

A single test dose of subcutaneous octreotide may be useful in predicting the subsequent efficacy of octreotide LAR. Octreotide LAR results in significant shrinkage of pituitary tumours of newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly. Whether its administration to such patients for 6-12 months can improve the efficacy of subsequent transsphenoidal surgery will require further study.

Systematic dose-extension of octreotide LAR: the importance of individual tailoring of treatment in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The depot long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR (LAR) provides effective and well-tolerated treatment for acromegaly. Despite a 4-weekly recommended injection frequency, prolonged duration of GH suppression has been observed in some patients following treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues. The aim of our study was to perform a prospective systematic study to determine whether extending the interval between doses of LAR allows maintenance of 'safe' GH in selected patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients (15 men, seven women), mean age 58.9 years (35-81 years) with active acromegaly (mGH > 5 mU/l), requiring treatment were selected to receive treatment with LAR. Eleven patients had received previous treatment with both transsphenoidal surgery and radiotherapy, while six had received surgery alone. All patients were commenced on treatment with 20 mg LAR intramuscularly (i.m.) every 4 weeks. Mean GH (mGH) was measured after three consecutive injections immediately prior to the fourth injection. The dose frequency was systematically reduced after every four injections if mGH < 5 mU/l. Once mGH > 5 mU/l, the dose frequency was increased and mGH reassessed.

RESULTS

The dosing interval was successfully increased to greater than 4 weeks in 20/22 patients (90.9%). Six of 22 (27.3%) were receiving injections every 8 weeks and 3/22 (13.6%) every 12 weeks. GH and IGF-I were lower on treatment compared with baseline (P < 0.01). There was no difference in individual mGH and IGF-I between the values on 4-weekly dosing and those at final dose frequency. There was no relationship between final dose frequency and either mean GH or IGF-I prior to LAR, patient age, or previous treatment. The percentage suppression following 100 micro g octreotide subcutaneously did not predict subsequent dose frequency of LAR. The drug cost if patients had continued at 4-weekly intervals would be UK pound 187 850, compared with UK pound 101 065 for the individually titrated dose frequency (P < 0.01). This represents a final cost of 53.8% of the 4-weekly injection price.

CONCLUSION

Individual tailoring of LAR administration maintains control of acromegaly, with reduced injection frequency and improved cost-effectiveness.

Lanreotide 60 mg, a new long-acting formulation: effectiveness in the chronic treatment of acromegaly

Lanreotide (LAN) 60 mg (LAN60), a new long-acting formulation of LAN alleged to suppress GH/IGF-I hypersecretion for 28 d in acromegalic patients, was administered in a prospective open multicenter study to 92 patients with active acromegaly (61 women and 31 men, aged 20-79 yr). LAN60 was given as adjuvant treatment (AT) in 62 patients; the other 30 patients [primary treatment (PT)] were de novo (n = 20) or previously treated only by pharmacotherapy (n = 10). After wash-out from previous treatments, LAN60 was started im every 28 d for 3 injections; the dose was then individually tailored, aiming at lowering GH to less than 2.5 micro g/liter and IGF-I to the normal range. After a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 6-48 months), IGF-I normalized in 65% of patients, decreasing from 199 +/- 8% (expressed as a percentage of the upper limit of normal range; mean +/- SE) to 87 +/- 4% (P < 0.0001). GH fell to less than 2.5 microg/liter in 63% of patients and to less than 1 microg/liter in 25%, decreasing from 20 +/- 3 to 3 +/- 0.4 microg/liter (P < 0.0001). A progressive increase in the rate of IGF-I normalization was observed (from 49% at 1 yr to 77% at 3 yr). The rate of GH/IGF-I normalization was 72% at 36 months by Kaplan-Meier analysis. No tachyphylaxis was observed throughout the study. Shortening the interval between injections to 21 d improved GH/IGF-I suppression. PT and AT patients achieved similar final GH/IGF-I levels and rates of normalization. Tumor shrank in 39% of assessable patients and in 50% of PT. Plasma glucose levels did not change, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol increased (by 19.3 +/- 5.1%; P = 0.0215). Gallstones appeared or worsened in 13% of patients. LAN60 is a new, very effective and long-lasting formulation for the treatment of acromegaly. The persistence of a powerful suppression of GH/IGF-I levels, the progressive increase in the rate of IGF-I normalization, and the similarity in the efficacy achieved in PT and AT patients point to a role for LAN60 in the primary treatment of acromegaly.

How effective are current therapies for acromegaly?

Currently available therapies for acromegaly are transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), radiotherapy (RT) and medical therapy with the dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues. The goals of these therapies for acromegaly are to normalize excessive hormone secretion, thus normalizing serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and of insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I), to reduce the clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly and to reduce tumor size in order to relieve any symptoms due to tumor mass effect. These goals should be accomplished while preserving pituitary function and with as few side effects as possible.TSS, the initial choice of therapy in most patients, is the most effective therapy at reducing the signs and symptoms of mass effect such as visual or neurological compromise. TSS is potentially curative, but the outcome is highly dependent on the tumor size, the degree of tumor invasion and the expertise of the surgeon. TSS can achieve biochemical control with normalization of IGF-I in 80-90% of patients with microadenomas and in 50-60% of those with macroadenomas. RT may be used as adjunctive therapy after unsuccessful surgery. RT can lower GH levels and normalize IGF-I levels, but there is a long lag time before this effect is achieved. Biochemical control is not achieved for 6-10 years after conventional fractionated RT; the time to clinical effect after gamma knife RT seems to be shorter. The most common complication after all forms of RT for acromegaly is the development of new hypopituitarism. Medical therapy has assumed the major role as adjunctive therapy of acromegaly. The dopamine agonists used for the therapy of acromegaly include bromocriptine, quinagolide and cabergoline. Cabergoline seems to be the most efficacious of the dopamine agonists for the treatment of acromegaly, with normalization of IGF-I being achieved in up to 35% of patients treated. Dopamine agonists are generally not effective at reducing the size of pure GH-secreting pituitary tumors. Somatostatin analogues are the most effective medical therapy currently available for acromegaly. The clinically available long-acting somatostatin analogues are long-acting octreotide and slow-release lanreotide. Overall, IGF-I levels normalize in about 66% of patients treated with long-acting octreotide and in 48% of patients treated with lanreotide. About 30% of GH-secreting tumors treated with somatostatin analogues as adjunctive therapy will have some shrinkage, and the amount of shrinkage usually ranges between 20 and 50% of tumor size. Signs and symptoms of the disease improve in about two-thirds of patients treated with long-acting somatostatin analogues. Gastrointestinal side effects are common when initiating somatostatin analogue therapy, but these effects do not typically limit continued use. Multi-modality therapy for acromegaly is often needed to achieve disease control. However, even combinations of currently available therapies cannot achieve all the goals of therapy in many patients with acromegaly.

Sandostatin LAR in acromegaly: a 6-week injection interval suppresses GH secretion as effectively as a 4-week interval

INTRODUCTION

Depot preparations of long-acting somatostatin analogues are being used increasingly in the treatment of GH hypersecretion in patients with acromegaly, either as primary treatment or as secondary treatment following incomplete surgery. In 60% of these patients, Sandostatin long-acting release (LAR), the depot preparation of octreotide, achieves effective suppression of serum GH (< 5 mU/l) and IGF-I levels. The advice is to administer Sandostatin LAR at 4-week intervals. After injection, serum octreotide shows an initial peak and thereafter maximal values between 14 and 42 days. There have been suggestions that the dose interval of this preparation could be increased, resulting in reduced costs, although this concept has not been confirmed by studies.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We performed a prospective, cohort study in patients with active acromegaly but with normal serum GH and IGF-I levels during Sandostatin LAR treatment to assess whether the dose interval could be safely increased from 4 to 6 weeks, without significant effect on serum GH concentrations or other biochemical and clinical markers of GH hypersecretion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients (seven males) with GH concentrations below 5 mU/l during Sandostatin LAR treatment entered an 8-week withdrawal study following an injection. Subsequently, during an interval study patients received injections at 6-week intervals (t = 0, 8, 14, 20, 26, 32, 38 and 44 weeks). Study parameters (fasting GH, average GH of eight plasma samples, IGF-I, and octreotide concentrations, symptoms score and quality-of-life score) were assessed 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks following the first injection (withdrawal) and at 26 and 44 weeks (interval study) before the next injection.

RESULTS

During the withdrawal study, mean serum GH concentration increased significantly from 1.68 +/- 0.3 at 4 weeks to 2.57 +/- 0.5 mU/l at 6 weeks (P = 0.04, 4 vs. 6 weeks) and to 2.89 +/- 0.4 mU/l at 8 weeks (P < 0.001, 4 vs. 8 weeks). Mean serum GH concentration was below 5 mU/l in all patients at all time points, except for one patient at 8 weeks, and IGF-I levels remained normal in all patients. During withdrawal up to 8 weeks there was no significant change in serum IGF-I concentration, symptoms score or quality-of-life score. Mean serum octreotide decreased significantly from 1610 +/- 355 ng/l at 2 weeks to 1045 +/- 272 ng/l at 6 weeks (P = 0.002, 2 and 4 vs. 6 weeks) and to 559 +/- 147 ng/l at 8 weeks. In the interval study, one patient had mean serum GH above 5 mU/l associated with an increase in symptoms at 26 weeks and she was withdrawn from the study. The remaining 13 patients completed the 6-weekly injection study protocol and in the long term no significant changes in mean serum GH concentration, IGF-I concentration or symptom scores were observed (6 vs. 26 and 44 weeks). All patients had a mean serum GH concentration < 5 mU/l and serum IGF-I remained normal in 11 out of 14 patients at 26 weeks and nine out of 13 patients at 44 weeks. Moreover, the mean octreotide concentrations measured 6 weeks after a Sandostatin LAR injection did not decrease in the long term.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of serum GH concentrations, most patients with serum GH levels < 5 mU/l during Sandostatin LAR treatment using a 4-weekly schedule can be effectively treated with 6-weekly injections. However, during long-term treatment with 6-weekly injections, discordant IGF-I and GH results were observed in 30% of the patients and careful clinical monitoring is therefore required.

The treatment of de novo acromegalic patients with octreotide-LAR: efficacy, tolerability and cardiovascular effects

AIM

Somatostatin analogues are normally used as adjunctive therapy to surgery and radiotherapy in management of acromegaly. We studied the effects of de novo OCT-LAR treatment on growth hormone (GH) suppression, tumour size, cardiovascular function, clinical symptoms, signs and quality of life in 9 newly diagnosed acromegalic patients.

METHODS

Patients commenced OCT-LAR 20 mg IM monthly for 2 months. Dose increased to 30 mg monthly if mean serum GH (MGH) > 5 mU/l (2 microg/litre) (7 patients). Treatment continued for 6 months. Cardiac function assessed by echocardiography at baseline and day 169. Left ventricular (LV) mass and ejection fraction (EF) calculated from 2D M-mode studies.

RESULTS

Serum GH demonstrated suppression in 8/9 patients (mean suppression 64.9% +/- 29.7%, range; 4-95.2%). MGH suppressed < 5 mU/ (2 microg/litre) in 3 (33%) patients. IGF-I and IGFBP3 normalised in 1 (12.5%) and 3 (38%) patients respectively. Tumour shrinkage seen in 30% patients. Eight patients were assessed by echocardiography. At baseline, 7 patients demonstrated abnormalities in LV mass and EF. At day 169, 6 patients demonstrated a fall and 1 an increase in LV mass. Overall there was no significant change in LV mass. A significant increase in EF was observed (p = 0.02). There were significant improvements in health perception (p = 0.01), fatigue (p < 0.05) and perspiration (p = 0.0039).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate OCT-LAR provides adequate control of acromegaly in a proportion of patients treated over 6 months. This is associated with improved LV function, evidenced by increased EF. Improved results are expected with longer-term treatment. OCT-LAR may be considered as primary treatment for acromegaly in selected patients.

Treatment of an acromegalic cat with the dopamine agonist L-deprenyl

Acromegaly was diagnosed in a 14-year-old domestic short hair cat presented for investigation and management of apparently insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus. Treatment with L-deprenyl and high doses of insulin was commenced. The L-deprenyl did not reduce the requirement for high doses of insulin and did not appear to reduce the clinical signs associated with the disease. The cat was euthanased one year after initial presentation.

Effects of two different somatostatin analogs on glucose tolerance in acromegaly

Impaired glucose tolerance is present in many acromegalic patients and treatment with somatostatin analogs has variable effects on glycemic control. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 somatostatin analogs on glucose metabolism, lanreotide slow release (L-SR) and octreotide long acting release (O-LAR), in 10 patients with acromegaly (2 of whom with overt Type 2 diabetes mellitus). Glucose and insulin levels in fasting conditions and in response to OGTT, evaluated as AUC, insulin resistance (IR) evaluated by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), GH, IGF-I, were assessed during L-SR and O-LAR treatment. Mean fasting glucose, glucose response to OGTT and HbA1c levels in 8 non-diabetic patients did not significantly change after L-SR therapy while they all increased after O-LAR treatment (p<0.05 vs baseline and L-SR). Mean HOMA-IR values calculated in acromegalic patients before medical therapy were higher than in normal subjects (p<0.005) and showed a significant decrease during both treatments (p<0.05). In the 2 diabetic acromegalic patients a worsening in glucose metabolism was observed during O-LAR treatment but not during L-SR. GH and IGF-I levels significantly decreased with both drugs and normalized respectively in 38% and 12% with L-SR, 50% and 25% with O-LAR. In conclusion, both drugs decreased IR in acromegalic patients; O-LAR seems to be more detrimental to glucose metabolism than L-SR, despite being more effective in reducing GH and IGF-I levels.

Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Acromegaly

Somatostatin peptide analogs have revolutionized the medical treatment of patients with acromegaly. More recent deep intramuscular depot preparations have further improved control, with consistent suppression of growth hormone secretion and optimal lowering of insulin-like growth factor-1. Effective control of growth hormone should, with long-term use, reduce morbidity and mortality from acromegaly and has been shown to result in partial involution of the pituitary adenoma in the majority of treated patients. The currently available depot formulations allow for an injection frequency of 14 days (lanreotide LA 30mg) to 28 days (octreotide LAR 20mg) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. In clinical practice, dose titration by evaluating a growth hormone day profile prior to the next injection can extend the interval between injection (to 6 or even 8 weeks in certain individuals). This is especially true for octreotide LAR, which also has increased flexibility regarding dosage with a 10 and 30mg preparation. The annual 'drug cost' is broadly similar between the two formulations though the additional expenditure on nurse time and clinic visits incurred by an increased injection frequency is a significant consideration. Decreased injection frequency improves acceptability for the patient without a loss in treatment efficacy. A subjective return of typical acromegalic symptoms, such as sweating and headache, also seem to be useful in predicting the timing of the next injection. Other formulations and doses of lanreotide are currently being evaluated, but more interestingly, newer analogs with greater efficacy at the type 5 somatostatin receptor subtype, and pan-receptor analogs, are being developed. These peptides, in conjunction with the likely availability of a growth hormone receptor blocking agent (pegvisomant), will further expand the medical therapy options for patients with acromegaly.

Current status and future opportunities for controlling acromegaly

Growth-hormone (GH) secreting adenomas, including acromegaly, account for approximately one-sixth of all pituitary adenomas and are associated with mortality rates at least twice that of the general population. The ultimate goal of therapy for acromegaly is normalization of morbidity and mortality rates achieved through removal or reduction of the tumor mass and normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. Previously published efficacy results of current treatment modalities (surgery, conventional radiation, and medical therapy with dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs) are often difficult to compare because of the different criteria used to define cure (some of which are now considered inadequate). For each of these modalities, pooled data from a series of acromegaly studies were reviewed for rates of IGF-I normalization, a currently accepted definition of cure. The results showed overall cure rates of approximately 10% for bromocriptine, 34% for cabergoline, 36% for conventional radiation, 50-90% for surgery for microadenomas and less than 50% for macroadenomas, and 54-66% for octreotide. These cure rates based on IGF-I normalization are generally less than those reported for cure based solely on GH levels. Novel new therapies for acromegaly include the somatostatin analog, lanreotide, Gamma Knife radiosurgery, and pegvisomant, the first in its class of new GH receptor antagonists. Although it does not appear that Gamma Knife radiosurgery results in significantly higher cure rates or fewer complications, it does provide a notable improvement in delivery compared with conventional radiation. Early studies have reported IGF-I normalization in 48% of lanreotide-treated patients and up to 97% of pegvisomant-treated.

Men with acromegaly need higher doses of octreotide than women

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of gender on the response of GH to short-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly, and on the GH and IGF-1 levels during long-term treatment with a slow-release formulation of octreotide.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Twenty-one men (mean age 54 years; range 26-78) and 15 women (mean age 54 years; range 22-74) with acromegaly were treated with subcutaneous injections of 100 microg short-acting octreotide twice daily. Serum samples for GH were taken before start of treatment, in the morning prior to the injection, and 1, 3, 5 and 7 h after the injection. Thirteen men (mean age 56 years; range 34-78) and 12 women (mean age 64 years; range 28-81) with acromegaly were switched from ongoing treatment with short-acting octreotide to injections of the slow-release formulation. A 4-h GH-profile and morning IGF-1 were taken at start and after 3, 9, 15 and 21 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous injections of 100 microg octreotide reduced the mean level of GH during a 7-h period to a similar extent in men and women compared to the GH levels prior to the injections. During long-term treatment with similar doses of the depot formulation of octreotide, the mean IGF-1 level remained significantly higher in the men than in the women, whereas there were no differences in the mean GH levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The responses to short- and long-acting octreotide illustrate an effect of gender, due to different sensitivity to GH in the periphery. Furthermore, the results show that in the treatment of acromegaly, men will need higher doses of octreotide than women to normalize IGF-1.