The Malmö International Brother Study (MIBS): further support for genetic predisposition to inhibitor development in hemophilia patients

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Haemophilia A: A Review of Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, Mutations, and the Development of Inhibitors

The purpose of this narrative review was to provide an overview that allows readers to improve their understanding of hemophilia A, which is considered a genetic disease with a high impact on the quality of life of people who suffer from it is considered one of the diseases with the highest cost for health systems (In Colombia it is part of the five diseases with the greatest economic impact). After this exhaustive review, we can see that the treatment of hemophilia is on the way to precision medicine, which involves genetic variables specific to each race and ethnicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), as well as environmental factors and lifestyle. Knowing the impact of each of these variables and their relationship with the efficacy of treatment (prophylaxis: regular infusion of the missing clotting factor VIII in order to prevent spontaneous bleeding) will allow for individualizing the medical behavior in a cost-effective way. For this is required to build more strong scientific evidence with statistical power that allows us to infer.

Hemophilia A subjects with an intron-22 gene inversion mutation show CD4+ T-effector responses to multiple epitopes in FVIII

Background

Almost half of severe hemophilia A (HA) is caused by an intron 22 inversion mutation (Int22Inv), which disrupts the 26-exon F8 gene. Inverted F8 mRNA exons 1-22 are transcribed, while F8B mRNA, containing F8 exons 23-26, is transcribed from a promoter within intron 22. Neither FVIII activity nor FVIII antigen (cross-reacting material, CRM) are detectable in plasma of patients with an intron-22 inversion.

Objectives

To test the hypothesis that (putative) intracellular synthesis of FVIII proteins encoded by inverted F8 and F8B mRNAs confers T-cell tolerance to almost the entire FVIII sequence, and to evaluate the immunogenicity of the region encoded by the F8 exon 22-23 junction sequence.

Patients/Methods

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 30 severe or moderate HA subjects (17 with an Int22Inv mutation) were tested by ELISPOT assays to detect cytokine secretion in response to FVIII proteins and peptides and to map immunodominant T-cell epitopes. Potential immunogenicity of FVIII sequences encoded by the F8 exon 22-23 junction region was also tested using peptide-MHCII binding assays.

Results

Eight of the Int22Inv subjects showed robust cytokine secretion from PBMCs stimulated with FVIII proteins and/or peptides, consistent with earlier publications from the Conti-Fine group. Peptide ELISPOT assays identified immunogenic regions of FVIII. Specificity for sequences encoded within F8 mRNA exons 1-22 and F8B mRNA was confirmed by staining Int22Inv CD4⁺ T cells with peptide-loaded HLA-Class II tetramers. FVIII peptides spanning the F8 exon 22-23 junction (encoding M2124-V2125) showed limited binding to MHCII proteins and low immunogenicity, with cytokine secretion from only one Int22Inv subject.

Conclusions

PBMCs from multiple subjects with an Int22Inv mutation, with and without a current FVIII inhibitor, responded to FVIII epitopes. Furthermore, the FVIII region encoded by the exon 22-23 junction sequence was not remarkably immunoreactive and is therefore unlikely to contain an immunodominant, promiscuous CD4⁺ T-cell epitope. Our results indicate that putative intracellular expression of partial FVIII proteins does not confer T-cell tolerance to FVIII regions encoded by inverted F8 mRNA or F8B mRNA.

Results of genetic analysis of 11 341 participants enrolled in the My Life, Our Future hemophilia genotyping initiative in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB) are rare inherited bleeding disorders. Although causative genetic variants are clinically relevant, in 2012 only 20% of US patients had been genotyped.

OBJECTIVES

My Life, Our Future (MLOF) was a multisector cross-sectional US initiative to improve our understanding of hemophilia through widespread genotyping.

METHODS

Subjects and potential genetic carriers were enrolled at US hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs). Bloodworks performed genotyping and returned results to providers. Clinical data were abstracted from the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network dataset. Community education was provided by the National Hemophilia Foundation.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, 107 HTCs enrolled 11 341 subjects (68.8% male, 31.2% female) for testing for HA (n = 8976), HB (n = 2358), HA/HB (n = 3), and hemophilia not otherwise specified (n = 4). Variants were detected in most male patients (98.2%% HA, 98.1% HB). 1914 unique variants were found (1482 F8, 431 F9); 744 were novel (610 F8, 134 F9). Inhibitor data were available for 6986 subjects (5583 HA; 1403 HB). In severe HA, genotypes with the highest inhibitor rates were large deletions (77/80), complex intron 22 inversions (9/17), and no variant found (7/14). In severe HB, the highest rates were large deletions (24/42). Inhibitors were reported in 27.3% of Black versus 16.2% of White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of MLOF are reported, the largest hemophilia genotyping project performed to date. The results support the need for comprehensive genetic approaches in hemophilia. This effort has contributed significantly towards better understanding variation in the F8 and F9 genes in hemophilia and risks of inhibitor formation.

Genome-Wide Association Study and Gene-Based Analysis of Participants With Hemophilia A and Inhibitors in the My Life, Our Future Research Repository

Introduction

Up to 30% of individuals with hemophilia A develop inhibitors to replacement factor VIII (FVIII), rendering the treatment ineffective. The underlying mechanism of inhibitor development remains poorly understood. The My Life, Our Future Research Repository (MLOF RR) has gathered F8 and F9 mutational information, phenotypic data, and biological material from over 11,000 participants with hemophilia A (HA) and B as well as carriers enrolled across US hemophilia treatment centers, including over 5,000 whole-genome sequences. Identifying genes associated with inhibitors may contribute to our understanding of why certain patients develop those neutralizing antibodies.

Aim and Methods

Here, we performed a genome-wide association study and gene-based analyses to identify genes associated with inhibitors in participants with HA from the MLOF RR.

Results

We identify a genome-wide significant association within the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus in participants with HA with F8 intronic inversions. HLA typing revealed independent associations with the HLA alleles major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR beta 1 (HLA DRB1*15:01) and major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ beta 1 (DQB1*03:03). Variant aggregation tests further identified low-frequency variants within GRID2IP (glutamate receptor, ionotropic, delta 2 [GRID2] interacting protein 1) significantly associated with inhibitors.

Conclusion

Overall, our study confirms the association of DRB1*15:01 with FVIII inhibitors and identifies a novel association of DQB1*03:03 in individuals with HA carrying intronic inversions of F8. In addition, our results implicate GRID2IP, encoding GRID2-interacting protein, with the development of inhibitors, and suggest an unrecognized role of this gene in autoimmunity.

Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Results of a Phase III, Open-Label, Multicenter Study with a Plasma-Derived Von Willebrand Factor (VWF)/Factor VIII (FVIII) Concentrate in Pediatric Patients <12 Years of Age with Hemophilia A (SWIFTLY-HA Study)

Background

Plasma-derived von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (pdVWF/FVIII; VONCENTO^®, CSL Behring) is a high-concentration, low-volume, high-purity concentrate, with a high level of VWF high-molecular-weight multimers and a VWF/FVIII ratio of ~2.4:1.

Methods

This study (NCT01229007) investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of pdVWF/FVIII in 35 previously treated (minimum 20 exposure days [EDs]) pediatric patients (<12 years) with severe hemophilia A. PK was evaluated with a single 50 IU FVIII/kg dose of pdVWF/FVIII. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed during on-demand treatment (n=17) or prophylaxis (n=18) for up to 100 EDs with a maximum study duration of 12 months.

Results

PK profiles were similar for patients aged <6 years and those aged 6–12 years, and, as expected, the youngest patients had an increased clearance. On-demand patients reported 320 non-surgical bleeding (NSB) events and received a median number of 29.0 infusions (median dose 34.2 IU FVIII/kg). Hemostatic efficacy was assessed by the investigator as excellent/good in all cases (24%/76%). The 18 patients in the prophylaxis arm experienced 173 NSB events (97 NSBs [56%] in three patients). Five patients (28%) had no NSB events. Overall, patients received a median number of 92 infusions (median dose 30.6 IU FVIII/kg). The majority of bleeds (92%) were successfully controlled with only one infusion. Hemostatic efficacy was assessed by the investigator as excellent (86%) or good (14%). Inhibitors occurred in three patients of which two were transient (low titer) and one persisted (high titer). These three patients had known risk factors for inhibitor development.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated comparable PK profiles for pediatric patients aged <6 years and aged 6–12 years, and an excellent efficacy and safety profile in this population. The adverse events reported were mostly mild to moderate with inhibitor rates within the expected incidence range.

Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A

The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism, we compared blood samples of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors for presence of immunoregulatory cells and markers, including regulatory B-cells (Bregs), regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and expression of regulatory markers on T-cells (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1], inducable T-cell costimulator, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), by use of flow cytometry. By cross-sectional analysis inhibitor patients (N = 20) were compared with inhibitor-negative (N = 28) and ex-inhibitor (N = 17) patients. In another longitudinal study, changes in immunoregulatory parameters were evaluated during ITI (N = 12) and compared with inhibitor-negative hemophilia A patients (N = 36). The frequency of Bregs, but not of Tregs nor MDSCs, was significantly reduced in inhibitor patients (3.2%) compared with inhibitor-negative (5.9%) and ex-inhibitor patients (8.9%; P < 0.01). CTLA4 expression on T-cells was also reduced (mean fluorescence intensity 133 in inhibitor versus 537 in inhibitor-negative patients; P < 0.01). Fittingly, in patients followed during ITI, inhibitor eradication associated with increased Bregs, increased Tregs, and increased expression of CTLA4 and PD1 on CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, inhibitor patients express significantly lower frequency of Bregs and Tregs marker expression, which are restored by successful ITI. Our findings suggest that an existing anti-FVIII immune response is associated with deficits in peripheral tolerance mechanisms and that Bregs and changes in immunoregulatory properties of CD4+ T-cells likely contribute to ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Safety and effectiveness of Rixubis in patients with hemophilia B: a real-world, prospective, postmarketing surveillance study in South Korea

Background

Rixubis (recombinant factor IX, nonacog gamma) is indicated for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes, perioperative management, and routine prophylaxis in hemophilia B patients. This real-world, postmarketing surveillance study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Rixubis in adult and pediatric hemophilia B patients in South Korea.

Methods

This prospective, observational, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT029 22231) was conducted in hemophilia B patients between April 2015 and April 2019, who were observed for up to 6 months after the initiation of Rixubis treatment. Safety was evaluated based on the number and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Hemostatic effectiveness was assessed by physicians and patients by using a four-point scale and rated as excellent, good, fair, or no response based on treatment type.

Results

In all, 58 patients were enrolled from four centers by seven physicians during the study period. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 57 and 54 patients, respectively. Overall, 11 AEs were reported in eight patients (14.0%), of which three were SAEs and occurred in three patients (5.3%). All 11 AEs were reported as unexpected and mild in severity, with no anaphylactic reaction, and 10 AEs (90.9%) resolved. The majority of AEs (10) were unrelated to Rixubis. Of the 142 hemostatic effectiveness assessments, 123 (86.6%) were reported as good or excellent.

Conclusion

Rixubis demonstrated an acceptable safety and effectiveness profile in the treatment of bleeding, perioperative management, and prophylaxis in hemophilia B patients in a real-world setting in South Korea.

Prevalence of FVIII Inhibitors Among Children with Hemophilia A: Experience at the Jordanian Royal Medical Services

Introduction:

Replacement therapy is constantly required by Hemophilia A (HA) patients lacking coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The most serious complication of this treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors).

Aim:

The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of FVIII inhibitors among children treated for HA at the Jordanian Royal Medical Services.

Methods:

A total of 165 diagnosed HA patients receiving on-demand treatment, were tested for FVIII inhibitors between 2003 and 2018. The age range was 6 months to 16 years. Coagulation and inhibitor screening assays were performed, followed by Bethesda assay for inhibitor-positive samples to quantify FVIII inhibitor titers.

Results:

Out of the 165 patients, 111 had severe hemophilia with FVIII level < 1%, 26 had moderate hemophilia with FVIII levels of 1–5% and 28 had mild hemophilia with FVIII levels of > 5%. Twenty patients had FVIII inhibitors, of whom 18 had high titers, 2 had low titers. The mean inhibitor level in low (titer) responders was 2.40 ± 0.85 BU, as opposed to 116.25 ±169.25 BU in high (titer) responders. In terms of disease severity, 18 of the 20 patients with FVIII inhibitors had severe HA, whereas two had moderate HA. No inhibitors were encountered in the mild HA group.

Conclusion:

Inhibitors only developed in moderate and severe cases of HA. The severity of the disease and age were the main contributing factors. The association between family history of inhibitors and the incidence of inhibitor formation warrants genetic evaluations to look for relevant mutations.

Inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia: A comparison of included patients and outcomes between a clinical study and a registry-based study

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a disease registry could serve as a suitable alternative to clinical studies to investigate safety of orphan drugs in children.

Methods

We used individual patient data from previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A from the factor VIII (rAHF‐PFM)‐clinical study and the PedNet registry. The primary outcome was the patient characteristics at entry and the difference in inhibitor development between the clinical study and the registry‐based study at 50 exposure days.

Results

Clinical study patients more often had a positive family history of inhibitors (31% vs 10%) and a high‐risk F8 genotype (82% vs 63%). In the clinical study 41/55 (75%) and in the registry‐based study 162/168 (96%) patients reached 50 exposure days. Inhibitors developed in 16 of the 41 patients in the clinical study (39%) vs 44 of the 162 patients in the registry‐based study (27%); seven patients (7%) vs 28 patients (17%) had high‐titre inhibitors. The risk of developing an inhibitor during the first 50 exposure days was similar (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.56‐1.94), when adjusted for family history of inhibitors, F8 gene mutation and intensive treatment at first exposure.

Conclusion

In the registry‐based study, patient numbers and completeness of follow‐up were higher. The risk of developing an inhibitor to a single product was comparable. Although the sample size of this study was too small to conclude on differences in high‐ or low‐titre inhibitors, this suggests that a registry could serve as a more suitable source for evaluation of high‐titre inhibitors in the setting of factor VIII deficiency.

Prevalence and Incidence of Non-neutralizing Antibodies in Congenital Hemophilia A- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: In hemophilia A the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies (NNAs) against Factor VIII (FVIII) may predict the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and accelerate the clearance of administrated FVIII concentrates. This systematic review aimed to assess: (1) the prevalence and incidence of NNAs in patients with congenital hemophilia without inhibitors and (2) the association between NNAs and patient and treatment characteristics.

Methods: We conducted a search in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. We included cross-sectional and longitudinal studies reporting on NNAs in patients with hemophilia A and B, who were inhibitor-negative at the start of the observation period. Data were extracted on: hemophilia type and severity, patient and treatment characteristics, NNA prevalence and incidence, NNA assays and inhibitor development. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, using adapted criteria of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Studies were classified as high-quality when ≥5/9 criteria were met. NNA assays were classified as high-quality when both quality criteria were met: (1) use of positive controls and (2) competition with FVIII to establish FVIII-specificity. We reported NNA prevalence and incidence for each study. The pooled NNA prevalence was assessed for well-designed studies in previously treated patients, employing high-quality NNA assays.

Results: We included data from 2,723 inhibitor-negative patients with hemophilia A, derived from 28 studies. Most studies were cross-sectional (19/28) and none reported on NNAs in hemophilia B. Study design was of high quality in 16/28 studies and the NNA assay quality was high in 9/28 studies. Various NNA assays were used, predominantly ELISA (18/28) with different cut-off values. We found a large variety in NNA prevalence (Range, 0–100%). The pooled NNA prevalence in high-quality studies was 25% (95% CI, 16–38%). The incidence of new NNA development was reported in one study (0.01 NNA per person-exposure day).

Conclusion: This systematic review identified studies that were heterogeneous in study design, patient population and NNA assay type, with NNA prevalence ranging from 0 to 100% in inhibitor-negative patients with hemophilia A. The pooled NNA prevalence was 25% in high-quality studies including only previously treated patients and performing high-quality NNA assays.

Detection of F8 int22h inversions using digital droplet PCR and mile-post assays

BACKGROUND

Inversions involving intron 22 (Inv22) of F8 are detected in approximately 45% of all severe hemophilia A patients. Diagnosis is complicated by the large size of the ~9.5 kb int22h repeated sequence, which generates the inversions. Methods such as long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and inverse-shifting PCR are currently used diagnostically, but suffer from low PCR efficiencies and are difficult to standardize.

OBJECTIVES

To design and validate a sensitive and robust assay for the detection of F8 int22h inversions.

METHODS

Digital droplet PCR using mile-post assays was used to investigate archival DNA samples.

RESULTS

The detection of linkage as a function of physical distance between loci was investigated using an anchor locus and mile-post loci at 1, 6, 12 and 15 kb distances from the anchor locus. The proportion of linked molecules decreased with increasing distance between loci and showed 30% to 40% linked molecules for loci 12 to15 kb apart. Mile-post assays specific for wild type and Inv22 type 1 and 2 chromosomes were then designed and optimized. All three assays showed high specificities and sensitivities, with coefficients of variation <5% for all assays. Analysis of 106 patients and 20 carrier mothers showed complete concordance with previously known mutation status. The analysis demonstrated the robustness of the assays versus input DNA concentration (6 ng and higher) and level of fragmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital droplet PCR and mile-post assays can be used to detect F8 int22h inversions. The assay systems are technically simple to perform, highly efficient, and robust.

Prevalence of inhibitors and clinical characteristics in patients with haemophilia in a middle-income Latin American country

INTRODUCTION

Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in patients with haemophilia (PWH). The prevalence of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) is approximately 25%-30%. Inhibitor prevalence differs among populations. Some studies report a prevalence of almost twice in Hispanic as compared to Caucasian patients. Most data available, on the prevalence of inhibitors and their predisposing factors, originate from centres in developed countries.

AIM

Establish the prevalence of inhibitors of FVIII and FIX in Mexico.

METHODS

This was an observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study. The records of all patients diagnosed with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB), with and without inhibitors, were included. Clinical and demographical characteristics of patients with inhibitors were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 22. The Ethics Committees of the various participating institutions approved this study.

RESULTS

A total of 1455 patients from the 20 participating centres were recruited, from which 1208 (83.02%) had HA and 247 (16.97%) were diagnosed with HB. The presence of inhibitors in severe HA was reported in 93/777(11.96%), and 10/162 (6.17%) in severe HB. Of them, 91.7% exhibited high titres in HA and 100% in HB.

CONCLUSION

In Mexico, the general prevalence of inhibitors varies considerably among centres. This study established a basis of comparison for future development and advances in the treatment and follow-up of patients. These findings also augment our understanding of risk factors related to inhibitor development.

Prevalence of FVIII inhibitors in severe haemophilia A patients: Effect of treatment and genetic factors in an Indian population

INTRODUCTION

Factor replacement therapy in treatment of haemophilia A is complicated by the production of neutralising antibodies known as inhibitors. The formation of inhibitors is multifactorial being associated with both genetic and environmental factors.

AIM

To document the prevalence of inhibitors in severe haemophilia in the community where most patients receive only infrequent episodic replacement therapy and evaluate the factors which could be contributing to it.

METHODS

Community based camps were conducted in different parts of the country. Patients were assessed through a structured questionnaire and blood samples were obtained for laboratory evaluation of inhibitors and defined immunological parameters.

RESULTS

Inhibitors were present in 87/447 (19.5%) of the evaluated patients. High-titre inhibitor (>5 Bethesda Units [BU]) was identified in 31 (35.6%) patients. HLA DRB1-13-positive cases (RR = 2.04; 95% CI 1.06-3.911; P = 0.033) had an increased risk of inhibitor formation which was retained in the high-titre subset. A decreased risk of inhibitor formation was noted with heterozygous IL4-590 C/T allele (RR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.108-0.442: P = 0.000). There were no significant correlations between any of the evaluated environmental factors and the development of inhibitors in this study.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A is similar to that reported among patients receiving regular replacement therapy. The data from this study, limited by its retrospective and cross-sectional study design, would suggest that genetic rather than environmental are more likely to impact the development of inhibitors.

Emicizumab for hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia is a serious bleeding disorder characterized by repeated bleeding episodes into joints and muscles which can lead to permanent disabilities. Treatment with factor replacement therapy has proven to be effective at preventing these complications; however, it can lead to formation of neutralizing antibodies termed inhibitors which significantly complicate the management of the disorder. These inhibitor patients suffer from increased morbidity and mortality and there has been a major unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. Recently, one such therapy, emicizumab, has been licensed in the United States. Areas covered: This manuscript contains a detailed discussion of the mechanism of action, the clinical trial development program as well as a review of the benefits and risks of this novel agent. In addition, practical considerations for the use of the agent are also described. Expert commentary: Emicizumab represents a new class of medication for the treatment of hemophilia A which in the past has relied on factor replacement therapy and bypassing agent (alternative factor) therapy. Emicizumab fulfills two major unmet needs in patients with hemophilia who have FVIII inhibitors. First, it provides for a much more effective therapy for the prevention of bleeding and second it substantially reduces the treatment burden.

Intensity of factor VIII treatment and the development of inhibitors in non-severe hemophilia A patients: results of the INSIGHT case-control study

Essentials Research suggests that intensive treatment episodes may increase the risk to develop inhibitors. We performed an international nested case-control study with 298 non-severe hemophilia A patients. Surgery and a high dose of factor VIII concentrate were associated with increased inhibitor risk. Physicians need to review arguments for factor VIII dose and elective surgery extra critically.

SUMMARY

Background Inhibitor development is a major complication of treatment with factor VIII concentrates in hemophilia. Findings from studies among severe hemophilia A patients suggest that intensive treatment episodes increase the risk of developing inhibitors. Objectives We set out to assess whether intensive treatment is also associated with an increased risk of inhibitor development among non-severe hemophilia A patients. Patients/Methods We performed a nested case-control study. A total of 75 inhibitor patients (cases) and 223 control patients were selected from 2709 non-severe hemophilia A patients (FVIII:C, 2-40%) of the INSIGHT cohort study. Cases and controls were matched for date of birth and cumulative number of exposure days (EDs) to FVIII concentrates. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aOR); the latter were adjusted for a priori specified confounders. Results Peak treatment of 5 or 10 consecutive EDs did not increase inhibitor risk (aOR, 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-2.5; and aOR, 1.8; CI, 0.6-5.5, respectively). Both surgical intervention (aOR, 4.2; CI, 1.7-10.3) and a high mean dose (> 45 IU kg-1 /ED) of FVIII concentrate (aOR, 7.5; CI, 1.6-35.6) were associated with an increased inhibitor risk. Conclusions Our findings suggest that high-dose FVIII treatment and surgery increase the risk of inhibitor development in non-severe hemophilia A. Together with the notion that non-severe hemophilia A patients are at a lifelong risk of inhibitor development, we suggest that in the future physicians will review the arguments for the FVIII dose and elective surgery extra critically.

Nonneutralizing antibodies against factor VIII and risk of inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A

Nonneutralizing antibodies against FVIII are detected in untreated or minimally treated patients with hemophilia A. The presence of nonneutralizing antibodies is associated with a substantially increased risk of inhibitor development.

Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in haemophilia treatment that have allowed patients to take greater control of their disease. However, the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the greatest complication of the disease and a challenge in the treatment of haemophilia making management of bleeding episodes difficult and surgical procedures very challenging. A meeting to discuss the unmet needs of haemophilia patients with inhibitors was held in Paris on 20 November 2014. Topics discussed were genetic and non-genetic risk factors for the development of inhibitors, immunological aspects of inhibitor development, FVIII products and inhibitor development, generation and functional properties of engineered antigen-specific T regulatory cells, suppression of immune responses to FVIII, prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, epitope mapping of FVIII inhibitors, current controversies in immune tolerance induction therapy, surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and future perspectives for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A summary of the key points discussed is presented in this paper.

Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutics: Causes and Association with Posttranslational Modifications

Today, potential immunogenicity can be better evaluated during the drug development process, and we have rational approaches to manage the clinical consequences of immunogenicity. The focus of the scientific community should be on developing sensitive diagnostics that can predict immunogenicity-mediated adverse events in the small fraction of subjects that develop clinically relevant anti-drug antibodies. Here, we discuss the causes of immunogenicity which could be product-related (inherent property of the product or might be picked up during the manufacturing process), patient-related (genetic profile or eating habits), or linked to the route of administration. We describe various posttranslational modifications (PTMs) and how they may influence immunogenicity. Over the last three decades, we have significantly improved our understanding about the types of PTMs of biotherapeutic proteins and their association with immunogenicity. It is also now clear that all PTMs do not lead to clinical immunogenicity. We also discuss the mechanisms of immunogenicity (which include T cell-dependent and T cell-independent responses) and immunological tolerance. We further elaborate on the management of immunogenicity in preclinical and clinical setting and the unique challenges raised by biosimilars, which may have different immunogenic potential from their parent biotherapeutics.

[Study on risk factors and follow-up of 26 hemophilia A children with inhibitors]

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk factors, characteristics and treatment of factor Ⅷ (F Ⅷ) inhibitor in Chinese children with hemophilia A (HA) through a retrospective case-control survey; To investigate the bleeding phenotype before and after inhibitor formation.

METHODS

The clinical data of outpatients and inpatients with HA children from January 2010 to December 2014 were collected. A case control study was performed to investigate the risk factors for inhibitor formation.

RESULTS

A total of 445 HA children were enrolled with 82(18.4%) severe, 269(60.5%) moderate, and 94(21.1%) mild cases; 26(5.8% ) patients, among whom 13 were severe HA and 13 moderate HA, had inhibitor (9 low titer inhibitors, and 17 high titer inhibitors). No inhibitor was found in mild HA patients. Intensive treatment (P= 0.030, HR=4.435, 95% CI 1.150-17.094) was a risk factor for inhibitor generation. After inhibitor formation, 2 patients received small dose rituximab for inhibitor eradication, and one of them also received ITI therapy. When bleeding, 65.2% (15/23) inhibitors received PCC treatment to stop the bleeding, 8.7% (2/23) inhibitors didn't receive any medication, and 26.1% (6/23) inhibitors chose intermittent small dose FⅧ treatment; Among those patients who didn't received inhibitor eradication, 87.5%(7/8) patients with low titer inhibitor showed gradual disappearance, and the median time was 3 months; 84.6% (11/13) patients with high-titer inhibitors remained positive in 12-48 months showing a gradual decrease with time; 7.7% (1/13) high titer inhibitors showed gradual disappearance in 2 years. The annual traumatic and provoked bleeding frequency for joints, skin and soft tissue showed no difference after inhibitor formation.

CONCLUSION

Intensive F Ⅷ treatment was a risk factor for inhibitor formation. The inhibitor didn' t increase bleeding frequency in HA children.

Identification of mutations in the F8 and F9 gene in families with haemophilia using targeted high-throughput sequencing

INTRODUCTION

At present, many methods are available for the genetic diagnosis of haemophilia, including indirect linkage analysis, direct sequencing. However, these methods are time-consuming, labourious, and limited in their application. Therefore, the development of new, more effective techniques is necessary.

AIM

To detect the F8 and F9 gene mutations in patients with haemophilia and their female relatives in 29 haemophilia A (HA) and 11 haemophilia B (HB) families.

METHODS

FVIII

C and FIX:C were analyzed using one-stage method, and factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors were tested using the Bethesda method. Intron 22 and one inversions were identified using long-distance polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and standard PCR. Non-inversion mutations of the F8 and F9 gene were identified by targeted high-throughput sequencing. All mutations were verified by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Intron 22 inversion was detected in eight HA families and intron one inversion was detected in one HA family. Apart from the inversion mutations, 20 mutations were identified in HA families, including 17 previously reported and three novel mutations: c.5724G>A (p.Trp1908*), c.6116-1_6120delGAGTGTinsTCC (p.Lys2039Ilefs*13), and c.5220-2A>C. We found a complex rearrangement in HA: intron one inversion concomitant with exon one deletion. In HB, eight recurrent mutations were detected, including six missense mutations and two nonsense mutations.

CONCLUSION

Targeted high-throughput sequencing is an effective technique to detect the F8 and F9 gene mutations, especially for the discovery of novel mutations. The method is highly accurate, time-saving and shows great advantage in uncovering large deletion mutations and also in distinguishing the wild-type genotype and heterozygous large deletions.

Racial Differences in Chronic Pain and Quality of Life among Adolescents and Young Adults with Moderate or Severe Hemophilia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We explored racial differences in adherence to recommended clotting factor treatment regimens, chronic pain, and quality of life (QoL) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with moderate or severe hemophilia.

METHODS

A convenience sample of hemophilia patients aged 13-25 years completed an online cross-sectional survey in 2012. Chronic pain was measured using the revised Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R) and dichotomized as high (FPS-R ≥ 4) or low (FPS-R < 4). QoL was measured with the SF-36.

RESULTS

Of 80 AYA participants (79 male), most had severe disease (91 %) and hemophilia A (91 %). Most were white (76 %) and non-Hispanic (88 %). At the univariate level, compared to whites, non-whites were more likely to have produced an inhibitor against clotting factor treatment (74 vs 38 %, p < .01), less likely to have commercial health insurance (16 vs 63 %, p < .001), more likely to report high levels of chronic pain (FPS-R ≥ 4) (63 vs 26 %, p < .01), and had lower SF-36 physical composite summary (PCS) scores. Adjusted logistic and quantile regression modeling, respectively, revealed that non-whites were 5.31 (95 % CI 1.62, 17.4; p < .01) times more likely to report high chronic pain and had median PCS scores that were 26.0 (95 % CI 11.0, 40.9; p < .01) points lower than whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted efforts to prevent and manage chronic pain among non-white AYAs with moderate or severe hemophilia are necessary. After accounting for demographic and clinical differences, there were no racial differences in adherence to recommended clotting factor treatment regimens; however, non-whites were more than five times more likely to report high levels of chronic pain, which predicted worse overall physical QoL, bodily pain, physical and social functioning, and greater role limitations due to physical health.

To clear or to fear: An innate perspective on factor VIII immunity

•

FVIII inhibitor development involves a combination of innate immune modulators.

•

Clearance and immunity is influenced at 3 levels: the protein, cell, and location.

•

Cells associated with FVIII half-life may influence the immune response against FVIII.

The enigma that is factor VIII immunogenicity remains ever pertinent in the treatment of hemophilia A. Development of neutralizing antibodies against the therapeutic protein in 25–30% of patients likely depends on the appropriate activation of the innate immune response shortly following antigen encounter. Our understanding of this important immunological synapse remains ill-defined. In this review, we examine the three distinct factors contributing to the fate of factor VIII almost immediately after infusion: the characteristics of the protein, the cell, and the microenvironment. We propose a continuum between clearance and antigen presentation that facilitates removal of FVIII from circulation leading to either tolerance or immunity.

Advances in the clinical management of inhibitors in hemophilia A and B

Inhibitors to factor (F)VIII or FIX are the most serious and challenging complication of hemophilia treatment, increasing morbidity and mortality because bleeds no longer respond to standard clotting factor replacement therapy. For patients with high-titer inhibitors, immune tolerance induction achieved through regular factor exposure is the only proven therapy capable of Inhibitor eradication and is almost always indicated for inhibitors of recent onset. Bypassing therapy is used to treat and prevent bleeding, but neither of the two currently available bypassing agents has the predictable hemostatic efficacy of factor replacement in hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Major research efforts are focused on the development of new, more potent therapies for the management of patients with inhibitors.

Genetic risk factors for inhibitors in haemophilia A

The current most serious side effect of haemophilia treatment is inhibitor development. Significant progress has been made over the last decades to understand why this complication occurs in some patients and it seems clear that both genetic and non-genetic factors are involved. Several issues however remain to be settled. A review was undertaken to summarise some key findings regarding the current view and available data on genetic markers of potential importance within this area. The causative F8 mutation, together with the HLA class II alleles, plays a pivotal pathophysiological role in inhibitor development. The types of mutation most frequently associated with inhibitors are large deletions, nonsense mutations, inversions, small deletions/insertions without A-runs, splice-site mutations at conserved nucleotides and certain missense mutations. Regarding HLA class II allele, it has been hard to consistently identify risk alleles. Ethnicity has consistently been associated with inhibitor risk, but the causality of this has so far not been resolved. Among immune regulatory molecules, several polymorphic molecules have been suggested to be of importance. Most of these need additional studies and immune system challenges have to be fully evaluated. Inhibitor risk should be further defined, as patients in the future may be offered non-immunogenic treatments.

The role of previously untreated patient studies in understanding the development of FVIII inhibitors

Development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII), the major complication of haemophilia A treatment today, is influenced by multiple factors. Genetic (F8 mutation, family history, ethnicity, polymorphisms in immune modulating genes) and non-genetic (intensive exposure to FVIII, presence of pro-inflammatory signals as might occur with large bleeds, infections, surgery, or other immune stimulants [e.g. vaccines]) risk factors as well as their complex inter-relationships contribute to the inhibitor risk profile of haemophilia patients, particularly in the previously untreated patient (PUP) population. Studies in PUPs have been fundamental to furthering the understanding of FVIII inhibitor development, as well as discovering previously unappreciated risk factors. The multi-factorial nature of inhibitor development makes it difficult to ascertain the contribution of FVIII products in inhibitor development through individual PUP studies. Sufficiently powered studies of large cohorts may overcome these limitations but interpretations should be conducted cautiously. Proper design and implementation of PUP safety studies will become even more important with the introduction of new molecules, such as extended half-life or human cell-line derived FVIII that propose reduced immunogenicity. Despite these difficulties, carefully performed clinical studies in PUPs may provide important insights into the natural history of the immune response to FVIII and may suggest targets for intervention to reduce immunogenicity.

Specific and global coagulation tests in patients with mild haemophilia A with a double mutation (Glu113Asp, Arg593Cys)

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneous bleeding phenotypes are observed in haemophilia A patients with the same mutation in the F8 gene. Specific mutations in the A2 domain of factor VIII are associated with mild haemophilia and a higher risk of inhibitor development. Double mutations in mild haemophilia A are rarely reported. In this study, we investigated the in vitro function of factor VIII, performing different specific and global coagulation assays, observed clinical characteristics and assessed the possible predictive diagnostic value of the differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical features of haemophiliacs with a mild phenotype were reviewed. Blood samples were obtained and analysed for mutations and coagulation assays: activated partial thromboplastin time, one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII activity, factor VIII antigen and rotational thromboelastometry.

RESULTS

We report on a cohort of 22 patients with double Glu113Asp, Arg593Cys mutations. All our patients have a quantitative defect of factor VIII and preserved similar functional activity. Factor VIII activities measured by the one-stage or chromogenic method were not discrepant, although the chromogenic assay resulted in 20% lower factor VIII activities. Waveform analysis showed a lower maximum value of the second derivative curve (Max2) of APTT with curve shape alternation, while thromboelastometry (INTEM) showed low sensitivity in comparison to results in a normal population.

DISCUSSION

In genotyping, the coexistence of a second mutation should never be excluded, especially in cases of discordant clinical presentation. Waveform analysis correlates better with factor VIII activity than thromboelastometry and the Max2 parameter could provide additional information in managing haemophilia patients. The utility of specific factor activity and global haemostatic assays in general practice still needs to be investigated.

FVIII inhibitors: pathogenesis and avoidance

The pathogenesis of inhibitory antibodies has been the focus of major scientific interest over the last decades, and several studies on underlying immune mechanisms and risk factors for formation of these antibodies have been performed with the aim of improving the ability to both predict and prevent their appearance. It seems clear that the decisive factors for the immune response to the deficient factor are multiple and involve components of both a constitutional and therapy-related nature. A scientific concern and obstacle for research in the area of hemophilia is the relatively small cohorts available for studies and the resulting risk of confounded and biased results. Careful interpretation of data is recommended to avoid treatment decisions based on a weak scientific platform. This review will summarize current concepts of the underlying immunological mechanisms and risk factors for development of inhibitory antibodies in patients with hemophilia A and discuss how these findings may be interpreted and influence our clinical management of patients.

Managing haemophilia for life: 4th Haemophilia Global Summit

The 4th Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Potsdam, Germany, in September 2013 and brought together an international faculty of haemophilia experts and delegates from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The programme was designed by an independent Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts and explored global perspectives in haemophilia care, discussing practical approaches to the optimal management of haemophilia now and in the future. The topics outlined in this supplement were selected by the Scientific Steering Committee for their relevance and potential to influence haemophilia care globally. In this supplement from the meeting, Jan Astermark reviews current understanding of risk factors for the development of inhibitory antibodies and discusses whether this risk can be modulated and minimized. Factors key to the improvement of joint health in people with haemophilia are explored, with Carlo Martinoli and Víctor Jiménez-Yuste discussing the utility of ultrasound for the early detection of haemophilic arthropathy. Other aspects of care necessary for the prevention and management of joint disease in people with haemophilia are outlined by Thomas Hilberg and Sébastian Lobet, who highlight the therapeutic benefits of physiotherapy and sports therapy. Riitta Lassila and Carlo-Federico Perno describe current knowledge surrounding the risk of transmission of infectious agents via clotting factor concentrates. Finally, different types of extended half-life technology are evaluated by Mike Laffan, with a focus on the practicalities and challenges associated with these products.

Inhibitors in haemophilia: what have we learned from registries? A systematic review

Congenital haemophilia A and B are genetic disorders affecting factor VIII and factor IX production, respectively. Factor replacement is the only effective treatment for these deficiencies, but a patient's immune system can develop inhibitory antibodies which bind and interfere with the function of the replaced factor in a variety of ways. The main treatment goal for patients with inhibitors is to induce immune tolerance to the injected factor. If not successful, a different treatment termed bypass therapy is needed to treat bleeds. The goal of this review is to demonstrate the usefulness of haemophilia registries as information sources to supplement available evidence regarding predictors of inhibitor development and immune tolerance induction (ITI) outcomes. In this systematic review, relevant keywords were used to search online academic databases during February 2014. Inclusion criteria were original publication and data obtained from a haemophilia or ITI registry with a minimum of 30 patients. A data collection form was created to extract information from selected manuscripts. Titles, abstracts and then full texts were screened to determine the eligibility of reports for this review. Eleven manuscripts from nine registries were determined eligible and included in the study. Registries have reported on some core variables, but are inconsistent in reporting less practiced predicting variables. Variables that may affect inhibitor and ITI outcomes were each divided into two categories: patient characteristics (such as age and family history) and treatment-related variables (including exposure days, treatment duration and dose). It is recommended that, in addition to exploratory hypothesis testing, a minimum set of variables should be collected and reported by registries. International collaboration and well-designed prospective registries are of major importance to advance this field in order to determine inhibitor risks and ITI outcomes and facilitate the development of new treatments.

The Fc gamma receptor IIa R131H polymorphism is associated with inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

The development of factor (F) VIII neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors) is a major complication of treatment with FVIII concentrates in hemophilia A and the etiology is still poorly understood. The low-affinity Fc gamma receptors (FcγR), which are expressed on immune cells, provide an important link between cellular and humoral immunity by interacting with IgG subtypes. Genetic variations of the genes encoding FcγRs (FCGR genes) have been associated with susceptibility to infectious and autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between genetic variation of FCGR and inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this case-control study samples of 85 severe hemophilia A patients (siblings from 44 families) were included. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variation of the FCGR2 and FCGR3 gene cluster were studied in an FCGR-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay. Frequencies were compared in a generalized estimating equation regression model.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (42%) had a positive history of inhibitor development. The polymorphism 131R > H in the FCGR2A gene was associated with an increased risk of inhibitor development (odds ratio [OR] per H-allele, 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.9). This association persisted in 29 patients with high titer inhibitors (OR per H-allele, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2) and in 44 patients with the F8 intron 22 inversion (OR per H-allele, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemophilia A patients with the HH genotype of the FCGR2A polymorphism 131R > H have a more than 3-fold increased risk of inhibitor development compared with patients with the RR genotype.

Genetic factors influencing inhibitor development in a cohort of South African haemophilia A patients

A critical complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in Haemophilia A (HA) treatment is inhibitor development. Known genetic factors predisposing to inhibitor development include FVIII (F8) gene mutations, ethnicity, a family history of inhibitors and FVIII haplotype mismatch. The aim of this study was to characterize and correlate these genetic factors in a cohort of South African HA patients. This was a retrospective study that included 229 patients and involved the analysis of patient files, HA molecular and clinical databases and molecular analysis of the F8 gene haplotype. Of the 229 patients, 51% were of black ethnicity, 49% were white, 5% had mild HA, 4% were moderate and 91% were severe, 36% were int22 positive and 13% were inhibitor positive. Of the inhibitor positive patients, 72% were black patients. Inhibitors were reported in 27% of black int22 positive patients, 13% of black int22 negative patients, 9% of white int22 positive patients and 7% of white int22 negative. The H1 haplotype was more common in whites (75%) and H2 was more common in blacks (74%). H3 and H5 were only found in black patients and had a higher frequency of inhibitor development than H1 and H2. In this small HA cohort, black patients had a significantly higher frequency of inhibitor development and the results were indicative of an association between inhibitor development, ethnicity and haplotype.

The Epidemiology of FVIII Inhibitors in Indian Haemophilia A Patients

A serious complication of replacement therapy in patients with bleeding disorders is the development of 'inhibitors', particularly FVIII inhibitors in haemophilia A patients. This leads to an increase in the management cost, morbidity and mortality, especially post-operatively. The mechanism of FVIII inhibitor development is quite complex and it is difficult to predict inhibitor development, but a prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical as early therapy can save lives. The aim of this study was to screen patients with bleeding disorders in India for inhibitors, and to analyse and compare the prevalence of inhibitors in different regions in India. Patient details were recorded and blood samples were collected in sodium citrate vacutainers from 1,505 patients with bleeding disorders, in different cities in India. Coagulation and inhibitor screening assays were performed, followed by the Bethesda assay in inhibitor positive samples to quantify the FVIII inhibitor titre. Out of the 1,505 samples analysed, 1,285 were Haemophilia A patients, out of which 78 (6.07 %) were positive for 'FVIII Inhibitors'. The highest incidence of FVIII Inhibitors was seen in South India (13.04 %). The highest incidence of 20.99 % was observed in Chennai, followed by Hyderabad (13.33 %), Jammu (9.90 %) and Guwahati (8.51 %), respectively, with respect to the samples analysed. The other regions showed an inhibitor incidence <8 %. The incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia A patients is different in different regions of India; this may be due to the intensity of treatment, type of product or the genetic characteristics of these patients.

Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation and risk of inhibitor development in nonsevere hemophilia A

The inhibitor incidence in nonsevere hemophilia A patients with certain F8 mutations approaches the inhibitor incidence in severe patients. These findings are highly relevant for clinical practice, as they facilitate identification of high-risk patients based on F8 genotype.