The clinical course of renal function in NIDDM patients with normo- and microalbuminuria

Association between napping and type 2 diabetes mellitus

As the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing rapidly and its consequences are severe, effective intervention and prevention, including sleep-related interventions, are urgently needed. As a component of sleep architecture, naps, alone or in combination with nocturnal sleep, may influence the onset and progression of T2DM. Overall, napping is associated with an increased risk of T2DM in women, especially in postmenopausal White women. Our study showed that napping >30 minutes (min) increased the risk of T2DM by 8-21%. In addition, non-optimal nighttime sleep increases T2DM risk, and this effect combines with the effect of napping. For nondiabetic patients, napping >30 min could increase the risks of high HbA1c levels and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), which would increase the risk of developing T2DM later on. For diabetic patients, prolonged napping may further impair glycemic control and increase the risk of developing diabetic complications (e.g., diabetic nephropathy) in the distant future. The following three mechanisms are suggested as interpretations for the association between napping and T2DM. First, napping >30 min increases the levels of important inflammatory factors, including interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein, elevating the risks of inflammation, associated adiposity and T2DM. Second, the interaction between postmenopausal hormonal changes and napping further increases insulin resistance. Third, prolonged napping may also affect melatonin secretion by interfering with nighttime sleep, leading to circadian rhythm disruption and further increasing the risk of T2DM. This review summarizes the existing evidence on the effect of napping on T2DM and provides detailed information for future T2DM intervention and prevention strategies that address napping.

Induction of PDCD4 by albumin in proximal tubule epithelial cells potentiates proteinuria-induced dysfunctional autophagy by negatively targeting Atg5

The precise molecular mechanism of autophagy dysfunction in type 1 diabetes is not known. Herein, the role of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) in autophagy regulation in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in vivo and in vitro was described. It was found that Pdcd4 mRNA and protein was upregulated in the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced DKD rats. In addition, a unilateral ureteral obstruction mouse model displayed an upregulation of PDCD4 in the disease group. kidney biopsy samples of human DKD patients showed an upregulation of PDCD4. Furthermore, western blotting of the STZ-induced DKD rat tissues displayed a low microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3)-II, as compared to the control. It was found that albumin overload in cultured PTEC could upregulate the expression of PDCD4 and p62, and decrease the expression of LC3-II and autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) proteins. The knockout of Pdcd4 in cultured PTECs could lessen albumin-induced dysfunctional autophagy as evidenced by the recovery of Atg5 and LC3-II protein. The forced expression of PDCD4 could further suppress the expression of crucial autophagy-related gene Atg5. Herein, endogenous PDCD4 was shown to promote proteinuria-induced dysfunctional autophagy by negatively regulating Atg5. PDCD4 might therefore be a potential therapeutic target in DKD.

Personalized Treatment for Small Renal Tumors: Decision Analysis of Competing Causes of Mortality

Purpose To compare the effectiveness of personalized treatment for small (≤4 cm) renal tumors versus routine partial nephrectomy (PN), accounting for various competing causes of mortality. Materials and Methods A state-transition microsimulation model was constructed to compare life expectancy of management strategies for small renal tumors by using 1 000 000 simulations in the following ways: routine PN or personalized treatment involving percutaneous ablation for risk factors for worsening chronic kidney disease (CKD), and otherwise PN; biopsy, with triage of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to PN or ablation depending on risk factors for worsening CKD; active surveillance for growth; and active surveillance when MRI findings are indicative of papillary RCC. Transition probabilities were incorporated from the literature. Effects of parameter variability were assessed in sensitivity analysis. Results In patients of all ages with normal renal function, routine PN yielded the longest life expectancy (eg, 0.67 years in 65-year-old men with nephrometry score [NS] of 4). Otherwise, personalized strategies extended life expectancy versus routine PN: in CKD stages 2 or 3a, moderate or high NS, and no comorbidities, MRI guidance for active surveillance extended life expectancy (eg, 2.60 years for MRI vs PN in CKD 3a, NS 10); and with Charlson comorbidity index of 1 or more, biopsy or active surveillance for growth extended life expectancy (eg, 2.70 years for surveillance for growth in CKD 3a, NS 10). CKD 3b was most effectively managed by using MRI to help predict papillary RCC for surveillance. Conclusion For patients with chronic kidney disease and small renal tumors, personalized treatment selection likely extends life expectancy. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Daytime napping and diabetes-associated kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetes-associated Kidney Disease (DKD) is a common comorbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. The present study investigates whether daytime sleeping duration in patients, ill with type 2 diabetes, is associated with DKD.

METHODS

A total of 733 outpatients of the cross-sectional baseline survey of the DIACORE study were analyzed with respect to their self-reported daytime sleeping duration, assessed by a standardized questionnaire. DKD was defined as eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m² and/or urinary albumin-to-creatinine-ratio (UACR) > 30 mg/g.

RESULTS

Mean daytime sleeping duration was 17 ± 27 min. With increasing daytime sleeping duration a statistically significant decrease in eGFR (p = 0.002) and increase in UACR (p < 0.001) were found, respectively. Prevalence of DKD was significantly higher in patients with longer daytime sleeping duration (31% in patients not napping, 40% in patients napping less than 30 min, 47% in patients napping 30-60 min, 56% in patients napping 60 min or more; p = 0.001). After accounting for known modulators (Age, sex, BMI, waist-hip-ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, physical activity, diabetes duration, HbA1c, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-Index), nighttime sleeping duration, apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), longer daytime sleeping duration was significantly associated with impaired eGFR [B (95% CI) = -0.05 (-0.09; 0.00), p = 0.044] and increased UACR [B (95% CI) = 0.01 (0.01; 0.02), p < 0.001], respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increased daytime sleeping duration is significantly associated with reduced eGFR and higher UACR, independent of known modulators of DKD. The direction of this relationship remains unclear.

Arterial blood pressure, proteinuria, and renal histopathology in clinically healthy retired racing greyhounds

BACKGROUND

Physiologic peculiarities of Greyhounds as compared to other dogs make interpretation of laboratory results in this breed challenging for veterinarians. Hypertension in retired racing Greyhounds (RRG) can contribute to microalbuminuria (MA), overt proteinuria, and renal histologic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinicopathologic findings, hemodynamic status, and renal histology in a population of healthy RRG.

ANIMALS

RRG presented to Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine for inclusion in a spay and neuter program.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. RRG were classified as normotensive (<160 mmHg) or hypertensive (>160 mmHg) based on blood pressure (BP) determinations using Doppler and oscillometric methods. Of the dogs evaluated, 62% (n = 29) were hypertensive and 38% (n = 18) were normotensive. Health status was evaluated using routine clinicopathologic tests (CBC, serum biochemistry, urinalysis) as well as evaluation of fractional excretion of electrolytes and MA determinations. Adequate renal biopsy specimens (n = 15) were evaluated using light, immunofluoresence, and electron microscopy.

RESULTS

All serum biochemistry results were normal in 45/49 dogs, but MA was more common in hypertensive (84% positive for MA) as compared with normotensive (18% positive for MA) RRG. Observed renal lesions were mild and renal biopsy scores were low in this sample of RRG.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension is common in RRG and might be breed-related. It is associated with MA, but observed renal lesions are mild. Whether or not hypertension and MA in RRG leads to progressive renal damage requires longitudinal study.

The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy

Between 20% and 40% of patients with diabetes ultimately develop diabetic nephropathy, which in the US is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Diabetic nephropathy has several distinct phases of development and multiple mechanisms contribute to the development of the disease and its outcomes. This Review provides a summary of the latest published data dealing with these mechanisms; it focuses not only on candidate genes associated with susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy but also on alterations in various cytokines and their interaction with products of advanced glycation and oxidant stress. Additionally, the interactions between fibrotic and hemodynamic cytokines, such as transforming growth factor beta1 and angiotensin II, respectively, are discussed in the context of new information concerning nephropathy development. We touch on the expanding clinical data regarding markers of nephropathy, such as microalbuminuria, and put them into context; microalbuminuria reflects cardiovascular and not renal risk. If albuminuria levels continue to increase over time then nephropathy is present. Lastly, we look at advances being made to enable identification of genetically predisposed individuals.

Dyslipidemia and the progression of renal disease in chronic renal failure patients

Dyslipidemia is a common complication of progressive kidney disease and contributes to the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Recent evidence also suggests a role for dyslipidemia in the development and progression of renal disease. Experimental studies have demonstrated that lipids may induce glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury, and that lipid-lowering treatments ameliorate renal injury. Various lipid abnormalities have been associated with the development and progression of renal disease in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Population-based studies and studies of diabetic patients have reported associations of various lipid abnormalities with the development of renal disease. In patients with CKD, lipid abnormalities have also been associated with renal disease progression. Post hoc analyses of some large clinical trials on patients with vascular disease, diabetes, or dyslipidemia, and a meta-analysis of small, prospective, controlled studies on patients with CKD (diabetics and nondiabetics) suggest that statins may slow the progression of kidney disease. It is unclear whether the beneficial renal effects of statins are due to the reduction of serum cholesterol levels and/or their pleiotropic effects. There is also evidence for synergistic renoprotective effects between statins and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. According to the results of post hoc analysis of several studies, treatment with fibrates does not seem to confer renoprotection, but evidence is scarce. In summary, there is growing evidence that lipid abnormalities may be a risk factor for renal disease, and that statins appear to confer a renoprotective effect.

Renal hyperfiltration in type 2 diabetes: effect of age-related decline in glomerular filtration rate

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We sought to characterise the effect of the age-related decline of GFR on hyperfiltration in type 2 diabetes and to identify clinical characteristics associated with hyperfiltration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GFR was measured in 662 type 2 diabetic patients by plasma disappearance of 99 m-technetium-diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid. The prevalence of hyperfiltration was calculated using both an age-unadjusted GFR threshold of >130 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) and an age-adjusted threshold incorporating a decline of 1 ml min(-1) year(-1) after the age of 40. The hyperfiltering patients were compared with type 2 diabetic subjects who had a GFR between 90 and 130 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) and were matched for age, sex and disease duration to allow for identification of modifiable factors associated with hyperfiltration.

RESULTS

The prevalence of hyperfiltration was 7.4% when age-unadjusted and 16.6% when age-adjusted definitions were used. The age-unadjusted vs -adjusted prevalence rates for hyperfiltration were 50 vs 50%, 12.9 vs 23.4% and 0.3 vs 9.0% for patients aged <40 years, 40 to 65 years and >65 years, respectively. Both the age-unadjusted and -adjusted hyperfiltration groups had lower mean diastolic blood pressure and lower serum creatinine levels than the control groups. Although the age-unadjusted hyperfiltration group had larger kidneys compared to the control group, this difference was no longer significant when the age-adjusted definition was used. There were no differences in HbA(1)c, mean arterial pressure, antihypertensive use, insulin therapy, dyslipidaemia, frequency of macro- or microvascular complications, BMI, urinary sodium, urea and albumin excretion between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Hyperfiltration was still more common among younger patients with type 2 diabetes even after adjusting for the expected age-related decline in GFR. Hyperfiltration was associated with a lower mean diastolic blood pressure independent of age.

The role of statins in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is associated with cardiovascular event rates that are at least as high as in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or in those with diabetes mellitus. Chronic kidney disease is therefore considered a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent. Treatment of dyslipidemia, which is very common in this population and reflects the pattern seen in the metabolic syndrome, reduces cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. Thus, patients with chronic kidney disease should be evaluated and treated for dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia is a risk factor for the development of impaired kidney function. Dyslipidemia is also associated with progressive renal disease in subjects with no overt renal disease, as well as those with diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease. Although definitive randomized controlled trials are lacking, the collective evidence suggests that treatment of dyslipidemia is associated with less decline in renal function. The use of potent statins in high doses can lead to transient proteinuria via impairment of proximal tubular receptor--mediated endocytosis, in a dose-dependent manner. Over the long term, however, the use of statins results in a reduction in proteinuria and in the rate of decline of renal function. Several large definitive trials that are currently underway to examine the safety and efficacy of statins in cardiovascular and renal protection should provide more definitive answers on the role of these drugs in this very high risk population.

Clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients: a report from the Managing Dyslipidemias in Chronic Kidney Disease Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is very high in patients with chronic kidney (CKD) disease and in kidney transplant recipients. Indeed, available evidence for these patients suggests that the 10-year cumulative risk of coronary heart disease is at least 20%, or roughly equivalent to the risk seen in patients with previous CVD. Recently, the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) published guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD, including transplant patients. It was the conclusion of this Work Group that the National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines are generally applicable to patients with CKD, but that there are significant differences in the approach and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD compared with the general population. In the present document we present the guidelines generated by this workgroup as they apply to kidney transplant recipients. Evidence from the general population indicates that treatment of dyslipidemias reduces CVD, and evidence in kidney transplant patients suggests that judicious treatment can be safe and effective in improving dyslipidemias. Dyslipidemias are very common in CKD and in transplant patients. However, until recently there have been no adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials examining the effects of dyslipidemia treatment on CVD in patients with CKD. Since completion of the K/DOQI guidelines on dyslipidemia in CKD, the results of the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) Study have been presented and published. Based on information from randomized trials conducted in the general population and the single study conducted in kidney transplant patients, these guidelines, which are a modified version of the K/DOQI dyslipidemia guidelines, were developed to aid clinicians in the management of dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients. These guidelines are divided into four sections. The first section (Introduction) provides the rationale for the guidelines, and describes the target population, scope, intended users, and methods. The second section presents guidelines on the assessment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 1-3), while the third section offers guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 4-5). The key guideline statements are supported mainly by data from studies in the general population, but there is an urgent need for additional studies in CKD and in transplant patients. Therefore, the last section outlines recommendations for research.

Lipid abnormalities and renal disease: is dyslipidemia a predictor of progression of renal disease?

Dyslipidemia is a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor that is associated with enhanced atherosclerosis and plaque instability. Renal insufficiency is associated with abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism in both the early and the advanced stages of chronic renal failure. These include alterations in apolipoprotein A (apo A)- and B- containing lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins, and triglycerides. In animal models, these alterations in lipid metabolism and action lead to macrophage activation and infiltration in the kidney with resultant tubulointerstitial and endothelial cell injury. Limited data in humans suggest that, in addition to contributing to CVD, dyslipidemia may be a risk factor for the progression of renal disease. The effects of dyslipidemia on the kidney are mainly observed in those with other risk factors for renal disease progression such as hypertension, diabetes, and proteinuria. Renal disease is a strong risk factor for CVD and African Americans have high rates of renal disease. Therefore, examining the effects of dyslipidemia on the development or progression or renal disease will be an important question for the Jackson Heart Study and is the topic of this review.

Protein restriction, glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Protein restriction delays the progression of non-diabetic and type 1 diabetic renal disorders. This study assessed whether protein restriction delays the onset or early progression of renal disorders in type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial. Outcomes were albuminuria (mg/24 h) and, as an estimate of the glomerular filtration rate, cimetidine-influenced creatinine clearance.

SETTING

Primary care.

SUBJECTS

Patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria or at least detectable albuminuria, or a diabetes duration >5 y.

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental group received dietary counselling on protein restriction (n=63); a control group (n=68) received the usual dietary advice. The duration of intervention and follow-up was 28+/-7 months.

RESULTS

After 6 months, protein intake differed only by 0.08 g/kg/day between the study groups. Subsequently, this difference decreased and eventually disappeared. An initial effect of protein restriction on albuminuria in favor of the experimental group was not sustained, and the glomerular filtration rate decreased in the experimental group at a 1.6+/-2.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) y lower rate than in the control group (P=0.5). Comparison of patients in the experimental group with a decrease in protein intake of at least 0.20 g/kg/day, with controls with no decrease, indicated a similarly small and insignificant effect on glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that, in the longer term prevention or delay of renal damage in patients with type 2 diabetes, protein restriction is neither feasible nor efficacious.

The reno-protective role of AT(1)-receptor blockers

In the 1970s and 1980s it became evident that progression of renal disease and blood pressure are correlated. Subsequently, it was shown that antihypertensive treatment, especially with agents that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), could slow the progression of diabetic renal disease. Several studies, particularly with RAS blockers, have confirmed beneficial effects on urinary albumin excretion in patients with diabetes and microalbuminuria or proteinuria. There are good reasons to explore dual blockade of the RAS with an AT(1)-receptor blocker and an ACE inhibitor. Receptor blockers may block the effects of angiotensin II more effectively than ACE inhibitors; moreover, ACE inhibitors increase bradykinins which may have positive effects on blood pressure and renal function. Such combination treatment has been found to be well tolerated and more effective in reducing blood pressure than either monotherapy. Positive effects on microalbuminuria or proteinuria have also been noted. Studies have shown that treatment with AT(1)-receptor blockers postpones end-stage renal disease and reduces the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Moreover, albuminuria was reduced to a greater extent with AT(1)-receptor blockers than with conventional antihypertensive therapy producing the same blood pressure reductions. In summary, AT(1)-receptor blockers are effective in all stages of diabetic renal disease, and have an excellent tolerability profile. Usually the side-effect profile is comparable with placebo. In certain situations, there may be a slight, readily reversible, increase in serum potassium. There may also be a slight reduction in GFR, reflecting a decrease in glomerular filtration pressure.

Effects of aggressive blood pressure control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients on albuminuria, retinopathy and strokes

BACKGROUND

Although several important studies have been performed in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, it is not known whether lowering blood pressure in normotensive (BP <140/90 mm Hg) patients offers any beneficial results on vascular complications. The current study evaluated the effect of intensive versus moderate diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control on diabetic vascular complications in 480 normotensive type 2 diabetic patients.

METHODS

The current study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial in normotensive type 2 diabetic subjects. The subjects were randomized to intensive (10 mm Hg below the baseline DBP) versus moderate (80 to 89 mm Hg) DBP control. Patients in the moderate therapy group were given placebo, while the patients randomized to intensive therapy received either nisoldipine or enalapril in a blinded manner as the initial antihypertensive medication. The primary end point evaluated was the change in creatinine clearance with the secondary endpoints consisting of change in urinary albumin excretion, progression of retinopathy and neuropathy and the incidence of cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5.3 years. Mean BP in the intensive group was 128 +/- 0.8/75 +/- 0.3 mm Hg versus 137 +/- 0.7/81 +/- 0.3 mm Hg in the moderate group, P < 0.0001. Although no difference was demonstrated in creatinine clearance (P = 0.43), a lower percentage of patients in the intensive group progressed from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria (P = 0.012) and microalbuminuria to overt albuminuria (P = 0.028). The intensive BP control group also demonstrated less progression of diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.019) and a lower incidence of strokes (P = 0.03). The results were the same whether enalapril or nisoldipine was used as the initial antihypertensive agent.

CONCLUSION

Over a five-year follow-up period, intensive (approximately 128/75 mm Hg) BP control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients: (1) slowed the progression to incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy; (2) decreased the progression of diabetic retinopathy; and (3) diminished the incidence of stroke.

Diabetic Renal Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Over the last 35 years an increasing number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have developed advanced renal disease and the need for dialysis. At present in the US, about 50% of the patients in dialysis units have type 2 diabetes mellitus. The explanation for the increase in the number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in end-stage renal disease programs is not completely clear, but the overall number of patients with this type of diabetes is rapidly increasing - and is expected to continue to increase over the next years. The diagnosis of renal disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus is usually straightforward, and is mainly dependent upon measurements of urinary albumin or urinary protein excretion as well as serum creatinine measurements. Renal biopsies or exact glomerular filtration rate measurements are rarely necessary. Microalbuminuria is the first sign of renal disease in diabetes mellitus. It predicts overt nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. Several studies document that albuminuria and microalbuminuria can be reduced by treatment with antihypertensives, especially agents that block the renin angiotensin system. New studies show that end-stage renal disease can be postponed by the use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. ACE inhibitors are also useful, and dual blockade of the renin angiotensin system has been utilized as well. However, generally speaking, patients with proteinuria have a poor prognosis. Screening for microalbuminuria is therefore proposed, and glycemic control and blood pressure should be optimized.

The impact of metabolic and blood pressure control on incidence and progression of nephropathy. A 10-year study of 385 type 2 diabetic patients

The aim of the present study was to find clinical parameters affecting incidence and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. A prospective study for 10 years was performed in 385 type 2 diabetic patients (diabetes diagnosis > or =30 years) attending a hospital-based outpatient clinic. Medical risk indicators like diabetes duration, HbA(1c), and blood pressure were related to the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy. The 10-year incidence of microalbuminuria was 38% (n=95) and that of macroalbuminuria was 10% (n=26). Out of 103 patients with microalbuminuria, 38 developed macroalbuminuria. In 252 normoalbuminuric patients, the mean of the HbA(1c) (P<.05) levels obtained during the study were associated with a doubling of the fractional albumin clearance. In contrast, blood pressure levels, age, diabetes duration, type of diabetes treatment, BMI, and gender were not (Cox regression analysis). Among 133 patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria, 22 more than doubled their serum creatinine level, in contrast to only 6 of 252 patients without. With Cox regression analysis, systolic (P<.01), but not diastolic, blood pressure or HbA(1c) levels or the above mentioned risk factors were associated with a doubling in serum creatinine. A total of 19 patients developed uremia during the study, out of whom 6 were in need of dialysis and 1 has had a renal transplantation, and 14 (74%) died. HbA(1c) (P<.05) and systolic blood pressure (P<.001) levels were associated with development of uremia, but not diastolic blood pressure or the other parameters mentioned above. This study shows that poor metabolic control is associated with development and high blood pressure with progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients.