Metformin and lactic acidosis: cause or coincidence? A review of case reports

Clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic heart failure treated with metformin: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore outcomes of metformin (Met) as an antihyperglycemic agent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) combined with chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

This article employed a meta-analysis approach to systematically search several databases. Stata 15.1 software was employed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis encompassed 15 randomized controlled trials, involving 20,595 patients with T2DM and CHF. The results revealed that in comparison to the non-Met group, the Met group exhibited a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.60-0.87) and a notably lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.52, 95%CI:0.29-0.92). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of hospitalization due to heart failure (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.70-1.04). Furthermore, the Met group demonstrated significant improvements in NT-proBNP levels compared to the non-Met group (WMD = -132.91, 95%CI: -173.03, -92.79). Regarding the enhancement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Dimension levels, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In individuals with T2DM and CHF, the use of Met is linked to a decreased likelihood of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular-related mortality. Furthermore, it can enhance cardiac function in CHF patients without elevating the risk of hospitalization due to heart failure, establishing its safety and potential benefits.

Repurposing Metformin for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Current Insights

Metformin is an orally effective anti-hyperglycemic drug that despite being introduced over 60 years ago is still utilized by an estimated 120 to 150 million people worldwide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Metformin is used off-label for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and for pre-diabetes and weight loss. Metformin is a safe, inexpensive drug with side effects mostly limited to gastrointestinal issues. Prospective clinical data from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), completed in 1998, demonstrated that metformin not only has excellent therapeutic efficacy as an anti-diabetes drug but also that good glycemic control reduced the risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, especially in obese patients and thereby reduced the risk of diabetes-associated cardiovascular disease (CVD). Based on a long history of clinical use and an excellent safety record metformin has been investigated to be repurposed for numerous other diseases including as an anti-aging agent, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, cancer, COVID-19 and also atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is the most frequently diagnosed cardiac arrythmia and its prevalence is increasing globally as the population ages. The argument for repurposing metformin for AF is based on a combination of retrospective clinical data and in vivo and in vitro pre-clinical laboratory studies. In this review, we critically evaluate the evidence that metformin has cardioprotective actions and assess whether the clinical and pre-clinical evidence support the use of metformin to reduce the risk and treat AF.

A Case of Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis Complicated by Acute Liver Failure, Acute Renal Failure, and Shock

Metformin is an oral antihyperglycemic agent used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management and is considered to be the first-line treatment for diabetic patients. It works by improving insulin sensitivity, reducing intestinal absorption, and decreasing glucose production in the liver, leading to decreased blood glucose levels. It is generally considered a safe drug; however, it is associated with an uncommon but serious side effect known as metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA), a potentially life-threatening condition. Patients with renal failure and liver disease are at high risk of developing MALA; therefore, the medication should be used cautiously in these patients. The diagnosis of MALA requires high suspicion from the physician of this specific entity; otherwise, it may be easily missed. Herein, we report a case of a 63-year-old female with alcoholic liver disease on metformin who was found to have MALA complicated by acute decompensated liver failure, renal failure, and shock.

[Cross-Sectional Study on Adverse Effects of Metformin Hydrochloride on 130 Patients Type 2 Diabetic Admitted to Medical Center and Diabetes Home of Sidi Bel-Abbès]

INTRODUCTION

MetforminHydrochloride is an antidiabetic used for many years, currently; it considered the first choice in treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). It decreases insulin resistance, does not induce hypoglycaemia, increases glucose utilization in the liver and skeletal muscle, and decreases hepatic glucose production. Its adverse effects (AE) are gastrointestinal, decrease in vitamin B12 absorption, abnormalities of hemogram and rarely skin reactions. The objective of this study was to report the type and frequency of AEs of MetforminHydrochloride used in the therapeutic management of T2D patients admitted to the medical center and the diabetes home of Sidi Bel-Abbès in Algeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out over a period of four months, from January 1st, 2017 to April 30th, 2017, involving 130 patients treated with MetforminHydrochloride consulting at Mimoun City Diabetes Home and Gambetta Diabetes Center in the town of Sidi Bel-Abbès. The primary outcome measure was the determination of the type and frequency of AEs related to normal dosages or overdose use of MetforminHydrochloride in T2D. Data were collected from patient records, using a questionnaire, and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20 software.

RESULTS

130 patients were included, including 82 women, with a mean age of 51.08±8.85 years (30-66). One hundred and ninety-eight (198) AEs were reported, an average of 1.52 AEs per patient. Among them, 95 (47.98%) AEs are digestive disorders (30.77% of patients suffered from diarrhea, 10.77% had nausea and vomiting, 8.46% suffered from abdominal pain and bloating, 3.85% lost their taste, 7.69% complained of epigastric cramps and 11.54% of anorexia), 29 (14.65%) AEs are hypoglycaemia, 73 (36.87%) AEs are other symptoms and 1 (0.50%) EI is vitamin B12 deficiency and no cases of lactic acidosis or allergic reaction were reported. Five (3.85%) patients had a total and lasting intolerance to MetforminHydrochloride leading to its discontinuation following persistent diarrhoea.

CONCLUSION

AEs of MetforminHydrochloride used in the management of T2D patients consulting at the medical center and the Diabetes home of Sidi Bel-Abbès are frequent. Digestive disorders were the most frequent, diarrhea was very frequent and led to discontinuation of treatment in 3.85% of T2D patients, followed by nausea and vomiting, then abdominal pain, bloating and epigastric cramps, and rarely taste metallic. Hypoglycaemia was frequent following its association with insulin, the onset of headaches and fatigue were frequent, but no case of lactic acidosis or allergic reaction was reported. Due to a lack of means, the dosage of homocysteine and methylmalonic acid had not been carried out to confirm the vitamin B12 deficiency in the patient whose level was less than 200ng/mL. A precise assessment of the imputability of reported AEs is necessary.

Quality and Characteristics of 4241 Case Reports of Lactic Acidosis in Metformin Users Reported to a Large Pharmacovigilance Database

Objective

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MaLA) occurs rarely and is thus difficult to study. We analysed 4241 individual case safety reports of lactic acidosis (LA) that implicated metformin as a suspected drug reported to the pharmacovigilance database of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. The primary objective was to review reports for quality and completeness of data to support diagnoses of MaLA. We also explored the correlations between reported biomarkers, and associations between biomarkers and outcomes.

Research Design and Methods

Records were analysed for completeness in supporting diagnoses of LA or metformin-associated LA (MaLA), against commonly used diagnostic criteria. Correlations between indices of exposure to metformin and biomarkers of LA and mortality were investigated.

Results

Missing data was common, especially for plasma metformin. Clinical/biomarker evidence supported a diagnosis of LA in only 33% of cases (LA subpopulation) and of MaLA in only 9% (MaLA subpopulation). The metformin plasma level correlated weakly with plasma lactate (positive) and pH (negative). About one-fifth (21.9%) of cases reported a fatal outcome. Metformin exposure (plasma level or dose) was not associated with increased mortality risk (there was a suggestion of decreased risk at higher levels of exposure to metformin). Plasma lactate was the only variable associated with increased risk of mortality. Examination of concomitant risk factors for MaLA identified renal dysfunction (including of iatrogenic origin) as a potential driver of mortality in this population.

Conclusion

Despite the high frequency of missing data, this is the largest analysis of cases of MaLA supported by measurements of circulating metformin, and lactate, and pH, to date. Plasma lactate, and not metformin dose or plasma level, appeared to be the main driver of mortality in the setting of LA or MaLA. Further research with more complete case reports is required.

Continuous use of metformin in patients receiving contrast medium: what is the evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Substantial inconsistencies exist in current guidelines regarding recommendations of metformin usage with the administration of a contrast medium. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine whether the risks of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and lactic acidosis increase with metformin use in diabetic patients receiving a contrast medium.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved from databases from inception to May 15, 2021. Studies that compared the outcomes of using metformin with not using metformin during contrast medium administration were included. The primary outcomes were incidence of CI-AKI and lactic acidosis. The secondary outcomes were renal function changes from baseline. Data analysis was using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Analyses of two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective cohorts examining a total of 1459 patients revealed no significant differences in the incidence of CI-AKI (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.63) and in changes in renal function measurements (serum creatinine: MD = 0.00 mg/dL, 95% CI, - 0.05 to 0.05; estimated glomerular filtration rate: MD = 0.22, 95% CI, - 2.47 to 2.91) after contrast medium administration between patients using and not using metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that continuing metformin during contrast medium administration is associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI, lactic acidosis, or renal function deterioration compared to patients who discontinued metformin or who were not metformin users. The limited quality of the included studies may compromise the strength of evidence provided in this meta-analysis.

KEY POINTS

There is no need to discontinue metformin either before or after intravenous contrast medium exposure in patients with eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. In patients receiving intra-arterial contrast medium with first-pass renal exposure, there is no need to withhold metformin if eGFR is above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. For patients who have an eGFR level between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and are receiving intra-arterial contrast medium with first-pass renal exposure, no case of lactic acidosis was observed based on present data, but further evidence is needed to make a strong suggestion regarding its safety.

Metformin doses to ensure efficacy and safety in patients with reduced kidney function

We aimed to develop a metformin dosing strategy to optimise efficacy and safety in patients with reduced kidney function. Metformin data from two studies stratified by kidney function were analysed. The relationship between metformin clearance and kidney function estimates was explored using a regression analysis. The maintenance dose range was predicted at different bands of kidney function to achieve an efficacy target of 1 mg/L for steady-state plasma concentrations. The dosing strategy was evaluated using simulations from a published metformin pharmacokinetic model to determine the probability of concentrations exceeding those associated with lactic acidosis risk, i.e. a steady-state average concentration of 3 mg/L and a maximum (peak) concentration of 5 mg/L. A strong relationship between metformin clearance and estimated kidney function using the Cockcroft and Gault (r2 = 0.699), MDRD (r2 = 0.717) and CKD-Epi (r2 = 0.735) equations was found. The probability of exceeding the safety targets for plasma metformin concentration was <5% for most doses and kidney function levels. The lower dose of 500 mg daily was required to maintain concentrations below the safety limits for patients with an eGFR of 15-29 mL/min. Our analysis suggests that a maximum daily dose of 2250, 1700, 1250, 1000, and 500 in patients with normal kidney function, CKD stage 2, 3a, 3b and 4, respectively, will provide a reasonable probability of achieving efficacy and safety. Our results support the cautious of use metformin at appropriate doses in patients with impaired kidney function.

Role of Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: Novel Insights and Potential Intervention Strategies

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has become one of the fastest growing public health problems worldwide. The disease is believed to involve a complex process involving genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. The human intestine harbors hundreds of trillions of bacteria, as well as bacteriophage particles, viruses, fungi, and archaea, which constitute a complex and dynamic ecosystem referred to as the gut microbiota. Increasing evidence has indicated changes in the gut microbiota composition or function in type 2 diabetic patients. An analysis of 'dysbiosis' enables the detection of alterations in the specific bacteria, clusters of bacteria, or bacterial functions associated with the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. These bacteria are involved predominantly in the control of inflammation and energy homeostasis. This review attempts to show that the gut microbiota are important factors for the occurrence of type 2 diabetes and are important for the treatment of gut microbiota dysbiosis through bariatric surgery, fecal microbiota transplantation, prebiotics, and probiotics.

The Association between Metformin Therapy and Lactic Acidosis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is increasing evidence to suggest that therapeutic doses of metformin are unlikely to cause lactic acidosis. The aims of this research were (1) to formally evaluate the association between metformin therapy and lactic acidosis in published case reports using two causality scoring systems, (2) to determine the frequency of pre-existing independent risk factors in published metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases, (3) to investigate the association between risk factors and mortality in metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases, and (4) to explore the relationship between prescribed metformin doses, elevated metformin plasma concentrations and the development of lactic acidosis in cases with chronic renal impairment.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases. Causality was assessed using the World Health Organisation-Uppsala Monitoring Centre system and the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. Compliance to dosing guidelines was investigated for cases with chronic renal impairment as well as the association between steady-state plasma metformin concentrations prior to admission.

RESULTS

We identified 559 metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases. Almost all cases reviewed (97%) presented with independent risk factors for lactic acidosis. The prescribed metformin dose exceeded published guidelines in 60% of cases in patients with impaired kidney function. Metformin steady-state plasma concentrations prior to admission were predicted to be below the proposed upper limit of the therapeutic range of 5 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis reviewed presented with independent risk factors for lactic acidosis, supporting the suggestion that metformin plays a contributory role. The prescribed metformin dose, on average, exceeded the dosing recommendations by 1000 mg/day in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment but the predicted pre-admission plasma concentrations did not exceed the therapeutic range.

Effect of continuous use of metformin on kidney function in diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Diabetes patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of contrast induced-acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). The effects of continuous use of metformin on kidney function are still controversial in patients submitted to primary PCI. This study aimed to assess continuous metformin therapy on kidney function in diabetic patients undergoing coronary intervention.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-four patients with metformin-treated diabetes, who underwent coronary intervention within 24 h for STEMI, were enrolled in the retrospective study. All the patients had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. According to the physicians' decisions after admission, 119 patients continued metformin treatment after primary PCI, while 165 patients discontinued it > 48 h after the procedure. Serum creatinine was collected at admission and within 48 h post primary PCI to evaluate the incidence of CI-AKI. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the determinants of CI-AKI.

RESULTS

No statistical difference in CI-AKI incidence between the continuous and the discontinuous metformin group (12.6%vs10.3%, p = 0.545). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2[p = 0.025, OR: 3.131; 95% CI (1.156-8.482)] and contrast volume [p = 0.002, OR: 1.010; 95% CI (1.004-1.016)] were predictive factors of CI-AKI. Metformin therapy was irrelevant to CI-AKI [p = 0.365, OR: 0.698; 95% CI (0.320-1.521)]. No case of lactic acidosis was found in this study. Besides, the study supported discontinuation of metformin was not beneficial for patients' blood glucose control after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicated that the metformin continuation after primary PCI for STEMI in diabetic patients with eGFR > 30 ml/min / 1.73 m2 did not increase the risk of CI-AKI.

The Phantom of Metformin-Induced Lactic Acidosis in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: Time to Reconsider with Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment

Objective

Metformin continues to be the safest and most widely used antidiabetic drug. In spite of its well-known benefits; metformin use in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is still restricted. Little has been reported about the effect of peritoneal dialysis (PD) on metformin clearance and the phantom of lactic acidosis deprives ESRD patients from metformin therapeutic advantages. Peritoneal dialysis is probably a safeguard against lactic acidosis, and it is likely that using this drug would be feasible in this group of patients.

Material and methods

The study was conducted on 83 PD patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. All patients were on automated PD (APD). Metformin was administered in a dose of 500 - 1,000 mg daily. Patients were monitored for glycemic control. Plasma lactic acid and plasma metformin levels were monitored on a scheduled basis. Peritoneal fluid metformin levels were measured. In addition, the relation between plasma metformin and plasma lactate was studied.

Results

Mean fasting blood sugar (FBS) was 10.9 ± 0.5 and 7.8 ± 0.7, and mean hemoglobin A1-C (HgA1C) was 8.2 ± 0.8 and 6.4 ± 1.1 at the beginning and end of the study, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.1 ± 4.1 and 27.3 ± 4.5 at the beginning and at the end of the study, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall mean plasma lactate level across all blood samples was 1.44 ± 0.6. Plasma levels between 2 and 3 mmol/L were found in 11.8% and levels of 3 - 3.6 mmol/L in 2.4% plasma samples. Hyperlactemia (level > 2 and < 5 mmol/L) was not associated with overt acidemia. None of our patients had lactic acidosis (levels > 5 mmol/L). Age ≥ 60 was a predictor for hyperlactemia. No relationship was found between plasma metformin and lactate levels.

Conclusion

Metformin may be used with caution in a particular group of ESRD patients who are on APD. Metformin allows better diabetic control with significant reduction of BMI. Information on the relationship between metformin and plasma lactate levels is lacking. Peritoneal dialysis appears to be a safeguard against the development of lactic acidosis in this group of patients.

A Review of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials of Glucose-Lowering Therapies and Their Effects on Heart Failure Outcomes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has long been recognized as a major risk factor for adverse atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events; however, recent data indicate that heart failure is now emerging as the most common and morbid cardiovascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus. When heart failure develops in patients with type 2 diabetes, prognosis is ominous, highlighting the need for glucose-lowering therapies that can prevent heart failure, improve outcomes, or both. Prior to 2008, there was a paucity of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term cardiovascular outcomes with glucose-lowering therapies. This changed after guidance on the assessment of novel glucose-lowering agents was issued by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Since then, significant progress has been made as a result of large cardiovascular outcomes trials. Though randomized controlled trials on insulin, sulfonylureas, and metformin are still limited, cardiovascular outcomes trials on newer glucose-lowering agents have included hundreds of thousands of patients with multiple years of follow-up. The increased risk of thiazolidinediones on heart failure had been well theorized and is now established; however, the increase in heart failure hospitalization with certain dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was unexpected. The reasons for discrepancies with regard to heart failure risk with different dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors remain unclear, and further mechanistic studies are ongoing. The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among patients with heart failure also remains unclear, and their effects may differ in patients with and without established heart failure, particularly those with decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Is the use of metformin in patients undergoing dialysis hazardous for life? A systematic review of the safety of metformin in patients undergoing dialysis

AIMS

Metformin may have clinical benefits in dialysis patients; however, its safety in this population is unknown. This systematic review evaluated the safety of metformin in dialysis patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials and observational studies evaluating metformin use in dialysis patients. Three authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes were mortality, occurrence of lactic acidosis and myocardial infarction (MI) in patients taking metformin during dialysis treatment for ≥12 months (long term). Risk of bias was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-1). Overall quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Fifteen observational studies were eligible; 7 were prospective observational studies and 8 were case reports/case series. No randomised controlled trials were identified. The 7 prospective observational studies (n = 194) reported on cautious metformin use in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Only 3 provided long-term follow-up data. In 2 long-term studies of metformin therapy (≤1000 mg/d) in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), 1 reported 6 deaths (6/83; 7%) due to major cardiovascular events (3 MI) and the other reported no deaths (0/35). One long-term study of metformin therapy (250 mg to 500 mg thrice weekly) in patients undergoing haemodialysis reported 4 deaths (4/61; 7%) due to major cardiovascular events (2 MI). These findings provide very low-quality evidence as they come from small observational studies.

CONCLUSION

The evidence regarding the safety of metformin in people undergoing dialysis is inconclusive. Appropriately designed randomised controlled trials are needed to resolve this uncertainty.

An Unexpected Complication Due to Metformin Use After Femur Fracture Operation: Metabolic Acidosis Without Lactic Acidosis

A 74-year- old male, who was known to have hypertension, chronic obstructive lung disease, and benign prostate hyperplasia, was evaluated preoperatively in our clinic for a femur fracture. In addition, it was found that the patient was using 1000 mg of metformin per oral due to type 2 diabetes. At the preoperative cardiology evaluation, the ejection fraction was 60% with normal systolic ventricular function. Routine laboratory tests were normal. Metformin was held 24 hours before surgery. Spinal anesthesia was applied with 10 mg bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl. Total blood loss at surgery was 150 cc. After an uneventful surgery, the patient was observed at the surgical postanesthesia care unit. Cardiac and respiratory physical examinations seemed normal but the patient had minimal acidosis and hypoxia in the arterial blood gas analysis. Twelve hours after the operation, compensated high anion gap ( 30 mEq/l) metabolic acidosis emerged, but lactate was normal. The patient's urea and creatinine levels were normal in the control blood tests, and the patient's urine output was above 0.5 ml/kg. Within this period, glucose levels were around 80-140 mg/dl. To overcome metabolic acidosis, bolus intravenous 8.4 % bicarbonate solution was administered. Bicarbonate infusion was started on the continuation of metabolic acidosis and base loss despite the bolus bicarbonate treatment. Since there was no other reason for the metabolic acidosis, metformin usage was considered to cause metabolic acidosis. During this treatment period, despite high anion gap acidosis, there was no lactate elevation. The patient had normal laboratory and hemodynamic values and was discharged from the intensive care unit at postoperative Day 3.

Still sour about lactic acidosis years later: role of metformin in heart failure

Metformin remains a widely-used, first-line pharmacotherapy agent for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus because of its efficacy, mild side effects, and affordability.However, use of this medication has traditionally been shunned by clinicians in patient populations that are considered at risk of lactic acidosis, such as those with heart failure. The underutilization of metformin can largely be attributed to the historical stigma of its biguanide predecessor, phenformin, and its association with lactic acidosis. Despite various studies finding low rates of lactic acidosis and the United States Federal Drug Administration's subsequent removal of heart failure from metformin's contraindication labeling in 2006, this oral hypoglycemic remains underutilized in this patient population. In addition to reports of the safe use of metformin in the heart failure population, a multitude of studies have also additionally suggested a modest reduction in mortality and morbidity. Metformin's role should be strongly reconsidered in the armamentarium of diabetes management in heart failure patients.

Direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C virus treatment perturbation of the metabolic milieu

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV), cirrhosis, and HCV medications including direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) ±ribavirin may all influence the metabolic milieu. While interferon-based regimens improve glucose tolerance, evidence is limited on DAAs. Cases of elevated lactate have recently been reported in patients treated with DAAs, and lactic acidosis is a known complication of antivirals used to treat hepatitis B virus and HIV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Measures were evaluated at baseline, week 4, end of treatment, and 12-24 weeks after treatment. Mixed-effects modeling was used to determine factors influencing glucose and lactate over time.

RESULTS

In total, 442 patients were treated (mean age 56, 65% male, 72% genotype 1, 48% cirrhotic). Glucose did not change on or after DAA treatment from baseline (P=0.51) aside from those with untreated diabetes, which declined (P=0.02). Overall, there was a decline in lactate following HCV treatment (mean 2.4-2.1 mmol/l; P<0.001). Lactate initially increased on treatment and then decreased after treatment completion in male patients treated with ribavirin. This pattern was not observed in other groups. There was no evidence of lactic acidosis with HCV nucleotide use.

CONCLUSION

Distinct glucose and lactate trajectories were identified without evidence of DAA metabolic toxicity. HCV treatment does not improve random glucose levels aside from perhaps in untreated diabetic patients.

Review of Biguanide (Metformin) Toxicity

In the 1920s, guanidine, the active component of Galega officinalis, was shown to lower glucose levels and used to synthesize several antidiabetic compounds. Metformin (1,1 dimethylbiguanide) is the most well-known and currently the only marketed biguanide in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Although phenformin was removed from the US market in the 1970s, it is still available around the world and can be found in unregulated herbal supplements. Adverse events associated with therapeutic use of biguanides include gastrointestinal upset, vitamin B₁₂ deficiency, and hemolytic anemia. Although the incidence is low, metformin toxicity can lead to hyperlactatemia and metabolic acidosis. Since metformin is predominantly eliminated from the body by the kidneys, toxicity can occur when metformin accumulates due to poor clearance from renal insufficiency or in the overdose setting. The dominant source of metabolic acidosis associated with hyperlactatemia in metformin toxicity is the rapid cytosolic adenosine triphosphate (ATP) turnover when complex I is inhibited and oxidative phosphorylation cannot adequately recycle the vast quantity of H+ from ATP hydrolysis. Although metabolic acidosis and hyperlactatemia are markers of metformin toxicity, the degree of hyperlactatemia and severity of acidemia have not been shown to be of prognostic value. Regardless of the etiology of toxicity, treatment should include supportive care and consideration for adjunct therapies such as gastrointestinal decontamination, glucose and insulin, alkalinization, extracorporeal techniques to reduce metformin body burden, and metabolic rescue.

Diabetes-related cardiomyopathy: The sweet story of glucose overload from epidemiology to cellular pathways

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major risk factor for heart failure (HF). Although the number of cases of myocardial infarction in the T2D population has been reduced by 25% over the last 10 years, the incidence of HF is continuously increasing, making it the most worrying diabetes complication. This strongly reinforces the urgent need for innovative therapeutic interventions to prevent cardiac dysfunction in T2D patients. To this end, epidemiological, imaging and animal studies have aimed to highlight the mechanisms involved in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Epidemiological observations clearly show that hyperglycaemia correlates with severity of cardiac dysfunction and mortality in T2D patients. Both animal and cellular studies have demonstrated that, in the context of diabetes, the heart loses its ability to utilize glucose, therefore leading to glucose overload in cardiomyocytes that, in turn, promotes oxidative stress, accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and chronic activation of the hexosamine pathway. These have all been found to activate apoptosis and to alter heart contractility, calcium signalling and mitochondrial function. Although, in the past, tight glycaemic control has failed to improve cardiac function in T2D patients, recent clinical trials have reported cardiovascular benefit with hypoglycaemic antidiabetic drugs of the SGLT2-inhibitor family. This review, based on clinical evidence from mechanistic studies as well as several large clinical trials, covers 15 years of research, and strongly supports the idea that hyperglycaemia and glucose overload play a central role in the pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Is it necessary to discontinue metformin in diabetic patients with GFR > 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 undergoing coronary angiography: A controversy still exists?

BACKGROUND

Although metformin is not directly nephrotoxic, it has been postulated that it can impair gluconeogenesis from lactate, which may lead lactate to be accumulated under circumstances such as contrast-induced nephropathy. The present study aims to assess the role of metformin in lactate production in a group of diabetic patients with GFR > 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2undergoing coronary angiography.

METHODS

In the present randomized clinical trial, 162 metformin-treated diabetic patients were enrolled. The enlisted patients were scheduled to undergo coronary angiography at Modarres Hospital from Feb 2012 to Nov 2012. Patients were randomly allocated to continue metformin during peri-angiography period (M (+) group) or to stop the medication 24 hours prior the procedure (M (-) group). All the patients had glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Iodixanol was the only contrast media which in all patients. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) was defined as an arterial pH <7.35 and plasma lactate concentration >5 mmol⁄L.

RESULTS

162 patients, including79 (48.7%) male and 83 (51.3%) female patients were enrolled in the study. The average of GFR was comparable in both groups (76 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the M (+) group versus 79 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the M (-) group, p=0.53). No significant difference was observed in the mean dose of metformin before the study between the 2 groups (2.18 tablets per day in M (+) group vs. 2.21 tablets per day in M(-) group, p=0.62).No lactic acidosis was observed in the studied groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that metformin continuation in diabetic patients with a GFR of more than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 undergoing coronary angiography does not enhance the risk of MALA development.

Patient-factors associated with metformin steady-state levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus with therapeutic dosage

AIMS

This prospective study aimed to analyze metformin steady-state concentration in repeated constant dosage and the influencing patient-factors as well as to correlate them with glycemic control.

METHODS

The validated HPLC-UV method was used to examine metformin steady-state concentration, while FBG and glycated albumin were used as the parameters of glycemic control during metformin administration.

RESULTS

A total of 82 type-2 diabetes patients were involved with 32.1% of them having metformin Cssmin and 84.1% having Cssmax of metformin within the recommended therapeutic range. One patient had metformin Css that exceeded minimum toxic concentration despite his normal renal function and administered therapeutic dosage of metformin. Higher Cssmax was found in patients with metformin monotherapy, while patients with longer duration of metformin use had significantly higher Cssmin.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with initial hyperglycemia and eGFR, metformin Cssmin became the only parameter that influenced FBG level (P < 0.05). Duration of previous metformin use should be considered in the strategy of optimizing metformin dosage. The type-2 diabetes patients with obesity are more suggested to take shorter interval of metformin administration (or possibly with sustained-release formulation) to keep Cssmin within the therapeutic range.

Is metformin poised for a second career as an antimicrobial?

Metformin, a widely used antihyperglycaemic, has a good safety profile, reasonably manageable side-effects, is inexpensive, and causes a desirable amount of weight loss. In 4 studies of patients with tuberculosis (1 prospective and 3 retrospective), metformin administration resulted in better outcomes. In mice with several models of endotoxemia, metformin diminished levels of proinflammatory cytokines and improved survival. Laboratory studies showed effectiveness of the drug on multiple pathogens, including Trichinella spiralis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Metformin administration in humans and mice produced major changes in the composition of the gut microbiota. These recently discovered microbe-modulating properties of the drug have led investigators to predict wide therapeutic utility for metformin. The recent easing in United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines regarding administration of metformin to patients with kidney disease, and reduced anxiety about patient safety in terms of lactic acidosis, increase the probability of broadening of metformin's usage as a treatment of infectious agents. In this text we review articles pertinent to metformin's effects on microorganisms, both pathogens and commensals. We highlight the possible role of metformin in a wide range of infectious diseases and a possible expansion of its therapeutic profile in this field. A systematic review was done of PubMed indexed articles that examined the effects of metformin on a wide range of pathogens. Metformin was found to have efficacy as an antimicrobial agent in patients with tuberculosis. Mice infected with Trypanosomiasis cruzi had higher survival when also treated with metformin. The drug in vitro was active against T. spiralis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and hepatitis B virus. In addition there is emerging literature on its role in sepsis. We conclude that metformin may have a potential role in the therapy for multiple infectious diseases. Metformin, in addition to its traditional effects on glucose metabolism, provides anti-microbial benefits in patients with tuberculosis and in a very wide range of other infections encounters in vitro and in vivo.

Metformin suppresses melanoma progression by inhibiting KAT5-mediated SMAD3 acetylation, transcriptional activity and TRIB3 expression

Metformin has beneficial effects of preventing and treating cancers on type 2 diabetic patients. However, the role of metformin in non-diabetic cancer patients and the precise molecular mechanisms against cancer have not yet been sufficiently elucidated. We recently reported that the pseudokinase protein TRIB3 acts as a stress sensor linking metabolic stressors to cancer promotion by inhibiting autophagy and ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation systems; genetically abrogating of TRIB3 expression reduces tumourigenesis and cancer progression. Thus, TRIB3 is a potential therapeutic target for diverse cancers. In this study, we found that metformin attenuates melanoma growth and metastasis by reducing TRIB3 expression in non-diabetic C57BL/6 mice and diabetic KK-Ay mice; overexpression of TRIB3 protects metformin from the activation of autophagic flux, the clearance of accumulated tumour-promoting factors and the attenuation of tumour progression. We further elucidated that TRIB3 acts as an adaptor to recruit lysine acetyltransferase 5 (KAT5) to SMAD3 and induce a phosphorylation-dependent K333 acetylation of SMAD3, which sustains transcriptional activity of SMAD3 and subsequently enhances TRIB3 transcription. Metformin suppresses SMAD3 phosphorylation and decreases the KAT5/SMAD3 interaction, to attenuate the KAT5-mediated K333 acetylation of SMAD3, reduce the SMAD3 transcriptional activity and subsequent TRIB3 expression, thereby antagonizes melanoma progression. Together, our study not only defines a molecular mechanism by which metformin protects against melanoma progression by disturbing the KAT5/TRIB3/SMAD3 positive feedback loop in diabetes and non-diabetes mice, but also suggests a candidate diverse utility of metformin in tumour prevention and therapy because of suppressing stress protein TRIB3 expression.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis mimicking ischaemic bowel

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a rare complication among patients who are diabetic, commonly presenting with non-specific findings, and developing mostly among those with other risk factors for lactic acidosis. We report the development of MALA in a 67-year-old man with diabetes who presented with progressive abdominal pain and bloody diarrhoea. On presentation the patient was in shock, with signs suggestive of peritonitis, and with severe lactic acidosis, renal failure and non-specific findings on abdominal CT. Neither the patient nor family could provide details of his home pharmaceuticals. Circulatory resuscitation with intravenous crystalloids and vasopressors was commenced, along with empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. Emergent laparotomy did not show pathological findings. Emergent haemodialysis, initiated postoperatively, resulted in rapid resolution of shock and lactic acidosis. A list of patient's medications, provided afterwards by the family, included metformin. Microbiological studies remained negative and renal function normalised by the time of patient's hospital discharge after 9 days.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA): Moving towards a new paradigm

Although metformin has been used for over 60 years, the balance between the drug's beneficial and adverse effects is still subject to debate. Following an analysis of how cases of so-called "metformin-associated lactic acidosis" (MALA) are reported in the literature, the present article reviews the pitfalls to be avoided when assessing the purported association between metformin and lactic acidosis. By starting from pathophysiological considerations, we propose a new paradigm for lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Metformin therapy does not necessarily induce metformin accumulation, just as metformin accumulation does not necessarily induce hyperlactatemia, and hyperlactatemia does not necessarily induce lactic acidosis. In contrast to the conventional view, MALA probably accounts for a smaller proportion of cases than either metformin-unrelated lactic acidosis or metformin-induced lactic acidosis. Lastly, this review highlights the need for substantial improvements in the reporting of cases of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Accordingly, we propose a check-list as a guide to clinical practice.

Association between Metformin Use and Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentration in Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

Metformin can reduce diabetes-related complications and mortality. However, its use is limited because of potential lactic acidosis-associated adverse effects, particularly in renal impairment patients. We aimed to investigate the association of metformin use with lactic acidosis and hyperlactatemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study from a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. A total of 1954 type 2 diabetes patients were recruited in 2007-2011, and stratified according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Lactic acidosis was defined as plasma lactate levels >5 mmol/L and arterial pH <7.35.

RESULTS

Metformin was used in 61.4% of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Plasma lactate levels were not different in the patients with and without metformin use. There was no difference in prevalence of hyperlactatemia and lactic acidosis between the patients with and without metformin use (18.9% vs. 18.7%, p=0.905 for hyperlactatemia and 2.8% vs. 3.3%, p=0.544 for lactic acidosis). Similar results were observed in the patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m². Most patients with lactic acidosis had at least one condition related to hypoxia or poor tissue perfusion. Multiple regression analysis indicated no association between metformin use and lactic acidosis, whereas tissue hypoxia was an independent risk factor for lactic acidosis [odds ratio 4.603 (95% confidence interval, 1.327-15.965)].

CONCLUSION

Metformin use was not associated with hyperlactatemia or lactic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Could metformin be used in patients with diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease?

Diabetes is an important cause of end stage renal failure worldwide. As renal impairment progresses, managing hyperglycaemia can prove increasingly challenging, as many medications are contra-indicated in moderate to severe renal impairment. Whilst evidence for tight glycaemic control reducing progression to renal failure in patients with established renal disease is limited, poor glycaemic control is not desirable, and is likely to lead to progressive complications. Metformin is a first-line therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes, as it appears to be effective in reducing diabetes related end points and mortality in overweight patients. Cessation of metformin in patients with progressive renal disease may not only lead to deterioration in glucose control, but also to loss of protection from cardiovascular disease in a cohort of patients at particularly high risk. We advocate the need for further study to determine the role of metformin in patients with severe renal disease (chronic kidney disease stage 4-5), as well as patients on dialysis, or pre-/peri-renal transplantation. We explore possible roles of metformin in these circumstances, and suggest potential key areas for further study.

Can an early diagnostic procedure of metformin-associated lactic acidosis in an emergency unit reduce mortality?

OBJECTIVE

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a rare but serious adverse reaction with a mortality rate of up to 50%. Unfortunately, diagnosis and care management are often delayed. The objective was to assess the impact on the mortality rate and length of hospital stay of a MALA early diagnosis procedure in diabetic patients with metformin at emergency department (ED) admission.

METHOD

From 1/7/2012, a new MALA diagnosis procedure (pH, lactate, metformin) was implemented in all diabetic patients with metformin just after their admission to the ED. The pharmacovigilance staff confirmed the MALA cases (defined as pH≤7.35, lactate concentration>5mmol/L) in patients exposed to metformin and after a causality assessment to eliminate other common causes of lactic acidosis. To assess the impact of this new diagnosis procedure, a before-after study was conducted between two groups: a series of cases with intervention (IG; 1/7/2012-30/6/2013) and a control series of past cases without intervention (CG; 1/1/2011-30/6/2012). The main outcome was the relative reduction of mortality rate and length of hospital stay between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-four MALA cases were confirmed in 745 subjects admitted with lactic acidosis, (IG: 12; CG: 22). A higher illness severity score in the IG vs. CG was observed: respectively arterial lactate (14.2±6.9 vs. 8.8±5.8mmol/L, P<0.05), arterial bicarbonate (7.8±4.3 vs. 14.3±6.3mmol/L, P<0.05). The median time up to MALA diagnosis was 20.5 (Q1-Q3: 11.3-38.5) minutes for IG and 55.0 (Q1-Q3: 33.0-132.0) minutes for CG. After procedure implementation, the mortality relative risk reduction was 26.7% (95% CI: -84.3%, 70.8%), and especially 54.2% (95% CI: -265.2%, 94.2%) in the ED. There was no difference in the hospital stay duration between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

While the results were not significant, the study suggests that the implementation of a MALA early diagnosis procedure in all patients with metformin admitted to an ED tends to decrease mortality, especially for serious MALA cases detected earlier.

Retrospective analysis of lactic acidosis-related parameters upon and after metformin discontinuation in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE

To investigate association between renal functions, lactic acid levels and acid-base balance in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease under metformin treatment and after metformin discontinuation in a real-life setting.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with diabetes (mean age 68.5 ± 8.9 years, 56.9 % females) in whom metformin treatment was discontinued due to reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were included in this retrospective study. Data on patient demographics, metformin treatment and laboratory findings on the last day of metformin treatment and 2-3 weeks after metformin discontinuation including blood lactate and creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and acid-base balance measurements in blood [pH, bicarbonate, base excess] were collected from medical records. The correlation of lactate levels with eGFR, blood pH and creatinine levels and changes in laboratory findings after metformin discontinuation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Before metformin discontinuation, hyperlactatemia was observed in 78.5 % of patients and metabolic acidosis in 36.9 % of patients, but none had lactic acidosis. Patients with normolactatemia and hyperlactatemia were similar in terms of metformin dosage and laboratory parameters. Lactate levels were not significantly correlated with serum creatinine (r = -0.14; p = 0.263) and eGFR (r = 0.11, p = 0.374). After metformin discontinuation, a significant decrease was observed in median lactate levels (from 2.20 to 1.85 mmol/L; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our findings support the low risk of MALA among patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment and the likelihood of metformin to be an innocent bystander without a pathogenic role in the lactic acidosis in most cases.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: Current perspectives on causes and risk

Although metformin has become a drug of choice for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, some patients may not receive it owing to the risk of lactic acidosis. Metformin, along with other drugs in the biguanide class, increases plasma lactate levels in a plasma concentration-dependent manner by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration predominantly in the liver. Elevated plasma metformin concentrations (as occur in individuals with renal impairment) and a secondary event or condition that further disrupts lactate production or clearance (e.g., cirrhosis, sepsis, or hypoperfusion), are typically necessary to cause metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA). As these secondary events may be unpredictable and the mortality rate for MALA approaches 50%, metformin has been contraindicated in moderate and severe renal impairment since its FDA approval in patients with normal renal function or mild renal insufficiency to minimize the potential for toxic metformin levels and MALA. However, the reported incidence of lactic acidosis in clinical practice has proved to be very low (<10 cases per 100,000 patient-years). Several groups have suggested that current renal function cutoffs for metformin are too conservative, thus depriving a substantial number of type 2 diabetes patients from the potential benefit of metformin therapy. On the other hand, the success of metformin as the first-line diabetes therapy may be a direct consequence of conservative labeling, the absence of which could have led to excess patient risk and eventual withdrawal from the market, as happened with earlier biguanide therapies. An investigational delayed-release metformin currently under development could potentially provide a treatment option for patients with renal impairment pending the results of future studies. This literature-based review provides an update on the impact of renal function and other conditions on metformin plasma levels and the risk of MALA in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Adverse event notifications implicating metformin with lactic acidosis in Australia

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the reported lactic acidosis cases associated with metformin from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and estimate the incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) in Australia.

METHOD

All "lactic acidosis" cases associated with metformin and reported to the TGA between January 1971 and October 2014 were included. Data extracted included patient demographics, medical history and co-existing conditions, metformin dosage and relevant pathology results.

RESULT

A total of 152 cases of suspected MALA were included in this study. For 20 patients the outcome was unknown. There were 23 patients (n=132, 17.4%) reported as deceased. Plasma lactate levels were higher in non-survivors (p=0.02). Thirty-five patients (n=132, 26.5%) were reported to have at least one pre-existing contraindication to the use of metformin; this proportion was not different between patients who died or survived. Renal impairment was the most common contraindication. Approximately 75% of patients were reported to have at least one clinical condition which might cause acidosis. Metformin dosage, plasma lactate and serum creatinine were not correlated. Based on the cases reported to the TGA, the incidence of MALA in Australia was estimated to be 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5-3.1) cases per 100,000 patient-years between 1997 and 2011.

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing clinical conditions, such as renal impairment, and acute illnesses associated with lactic acidosis were frequently reported in the cases of MALA. The estimated incidence of MALA was lower than in most previous studies in other countries, probably due to the nature of spontaneous reports to the TGA.

Physician's attitudes towards diagnosing and treating glucocorticoid induced hyperglycaemia: Sliding scale regimen is still widely used despite guidelines

AIMS

Treatment with glucocorticoids for neoplasms and inflammatory disorders is frequently complicated by glucocorticoid induced hyperglycaemia (GCIH). GCIH is associated with adverse outcomes and its treatment has short term and long term benefits. Currently, treatment targets and modalities depend on local protocols and habits of individual clinicians. We explored current practice of screening and treatment of GCIH in patients receiving glucocorticoid pulse therapy.

METHODS

A factorial survey with written case vignettes. All vignette patients received glucocorticoid pulse therapy. Other characteristics (e.g., indication for glucocorticoid therapy, pre-existent diabetes) varied. The survey was held between November 2013 and May 2014 on 2 nationwide conferences and in hospitals across The Netherlands. Pulmonologists and internists expressed their level of agreement with statements on ordering capillary glucose testing and treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Respondents ordered screening for GCIH in 85% of vignette patients and initiated treatment in 56%. When initiating treatment, respondents opt for sliding scale insulin in 62% of patients. Sliding scale insulin was more frequently prescribed in patients with pre-existent insulin dependent diabetes (OR 2.4, CI 1.3-4.2) and by residents (vs. specialists, OR 2.1, CI 1.2-3.5). Sixty-nine percent of clinicians experienced a lack of guidelines for GCIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians have a strong tendency to screen for GCIH but subsequent initiation of treatment was low. Sliding scale insulin is still widely used in episodic GCIH despite evidence against its effectiveness. This may be due to lacking evidence on feasible treatment options for GCIH.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis

: Metformin is the most commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic agent. Despite a good safety profile in most patients with diabetes, the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is real if safety guidelines are ignored. Experience with 3 cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is reported. Two cases were caused by inappropriate use of metformin in the presence of renal, cardiac and hepatic failure and 1 case followed an intentional overdose. The literature was reviewed on the clinical presentation, prevalence, pathogenesis, prognosis and management of metformin-associated lactic acidosis. This report highlights the importance of proper patient selection, clinical and laboratory monitoring and recommendation on when to stop the drug in ambulatory and hospitalized patients to prevent this unusual but potentially lethal complication.

Drug management in the elderly adult with chronic kidney disease: a review for the primary care physician

With advancing age, the functional reserve of many organs tends to decrease. In particular, the lean body mass, the levels of serum albumin, the blood flow to the liver, and the glomerular filtration rate are reduced in elderly individuals and can be further impaired by the concomitant presence of acute or chronic kidney disease. Moreover, patients with kidney disease are often affected by comorbid processes and are prescribed multiple medications. The aging process also modifies some drug interactions, including the affinity of some drugs for their receptor, the number of receptors, and the cell responses upon receptor activation. Therefore, older patients with kidney disease are particularly susceptible to the risks of adverse drug reactions. Planning a pharmacological regimen in such patients is confounded by the paucity of information available on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of a large number of drugs commonly used in this group of patients. Finally, many aged patients suffer from unintentional poor compliance. In this review, the problems physicians face in designing safe and effective medication management in elderly individuals are discussed, paying attention to those more frequently used, which may be potentially harmful in patients with kidney disease. The risks of overdosing and underdosing are outlined, and some recommendations to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions are provided. A review of the literature covering the field of drug management in older patients with kidney disease was performed by selecting those articles published between January 1, 1990, and December 1, 2014, using PubMed as a search engine with the keywords elderly, kidney disease, drugs, drug interaction, and renal function.

Metformin utilisation in Australian community and aged care settings

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to: (i) evaluate the potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP; defined as the use of metformin in the presence of contraindications and/or use in excessive dosage based on the renal function) of metformin in people receiving medication reviews in Australia and (ii) identify the predictors for PIP of metformin.

METHOD

Retrospective study of patients taking metformin through a large medication review database, containing records between January 2010 and June 2012. Data, including demographics, medical conditions, medications and relevant pathology results, were extracted for analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect risk factors for PIP of metformin.

RESULTS

Medication reviews pertaining to 6386 patients who received Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs, n=5327) or Residential Medication Management Reviews (RMMRs, n=1059) were included in this study. Overall, there were 12.9% (n=685) of patients in the HMR group and 17.4% (n=184) of patients in the RMMR group who had PIP of metformin. Multivariate logistic regression showed age, gender and type of medication review service as the significant (p<0.05) independent risk factors for PIP of metformin.

CONCLUSION

Metformin was often used in patients with contraindications, or in higher than recommended dosages in patients with renal impairment. Given the recent debate in the literature about the role of metformin in the presence of contraindications, a detailed prospective study in patients with contraindications and its association with lactic acidosis is warranted to establish the way in which metformin is to be used in these patients.

Metformin use in kidney transplant recipients in the United States: an observational study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although metformin is contraindicated in patients with increased serum creatinine levels (≥1.5 mg/dl in men, ≥1.4 mg/dl in women) in the United States, its use has not been systematically examined in kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to determine the frequency of metformin use and its associations among kidney transplant recipients, and to assess allograft and patient survival associated with metformin use.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we linked Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for all incident kidney transplants 2001-2012 and national pharmacy claims (n = 46,914). We compared recipients having one or more pharmacy claims for a metformin-containing product (n = 4,609) and recipients having one or more claims for a non-metformin glucose-lowering agent (n = 42,305).

RESULTS

On average, metformin claims were filled later after transplant and were associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rates before the first claim. Median serum creatinine (mg/dl) levels before the first claim were lower in recipients with metformin claims than in those with non-metformin claims (1.3 [interquartile range 1.0-1.7] vs. 1.6 [1.2-2.5], respectively; p < 0.0001). Metformin was associated with lower adjusted hazards for living donor (0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.80; p = 0.002) and deceased donor (0.55, 0.44-0.70; p < 0.0001) allograft survival at 3 years posttransplant, and with lower mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite metformin being contraindicated in renal dysfunction, many kidney transplant recipients receive it, and it is not associated with worse patient or allograft survival.

Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Metformin is widely viewed as the best initial pharmacological option to lower glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the drug is contraindicated in many individuals with impaired kidney function because of concerns of lactic acidosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of lactic acidosis associated with metformin use in individuals with impaired kidney function.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In July 2014, we searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for English-language articles pertaining to metformin, kidney disease, and lactic acidosis in humans between 1950 and June 2014. We excluded reviews, letters, editorials, case reports, small case series, and manuscripts that did not directly pertain to the topic area or that met other exclusion criteria. Of an original 818 articles, 65 were included in this review, including pharmacokinetic/metabolic studies, large case series, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, and a clinical trial.

RESULTS

Although metformin is renally cleared, drug levels generally remain within the therapeutic range and lactate concentrations are not substantially increased when used in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rates, 30-60 mL/min per 1.73 m2). The overall incidence of lactic acidosis in metformin users varies across studies from approximately 3 per 100,000 person-years to 10 per 100,000 person-years and is generally indistinguishable from the background rate in the overall population with diabetes. Data suggesting an increased risk of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients with chronic kidney disease are limited, and no randomized controlled trials have been conducted to test the safety of metformin in patients with significantly impaired kidney function. Population-based studies demonstrate that metformin may be prescribed counter to prevailing guidelines suggesting a renal risk in up to 1 in 4 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus--use which, in most reports, has not been associated with increased rates of lactic acidosis. Observational studies suggest a potential benefit from metformin on macrovascular outcomes, even in patients with prevalent renal contraindications for its use.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Available evidence supports cautious expansion of metformin use in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease, as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate, with appropriate dosage reductions and careful follow-up of kidney function.