Examining the efficiency of receptor/G-protein coupling with a cleavable beta2-adrenoceptor-gsalpha fusion protein

Fusion of the β2-adrenergic receptor with either Gαs or βarrestin-2 produces constitutive signaling by each pathway and induces gain-of-function in BEAS-2B cells

The β2AR is a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) known to orchestrate different cellular responses by the stimulation of specific signaling pathways. The best-established signaling pathways for the β2AR are the canonical Gs pathway and the alternative β arrestin 2 (βarr2) pathway. Exploring each pathway separately remains a challenging task due to the dynamic nature of the receptor. Here, we fused the β2AR with its cognate transducers, Gαs and βarr2, using short linkers as a novel approach for restricting the conformation of the receptor and preferentially activating one of its two signaling pathways. We characterized the behavior of our fusion proteins β2AR-Gαs and β2AR-βarr2 in HEK293 cells by measuring their constitutive activity, transducer recruitment, and pharmacological modulation. Our fusion proteins show (a) steric hindrance from the reciprocal endogenous transducers, (b) constitutive activity of the β2AR for the signaling pathway activated by the tethered transducer, and (c) pharmacologic modulation by β2AR ligands. Based on these characteristics, we further explored the possibility of a gain-of-function mechanism in the human lung non-tumorigenic epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B cells. This immortalized human bronchial epithelial cell line has immunomodulatory properties through cytokine release mediated by β2AR stimulation. Our findings suggest that each signaling pathway of the β2AR is biased toward either the Th1 or Th2 inflammatory response suggesting a role in regulating the immune phenotype of respiratory diseases. Our data imply that our fusion proteins can be used as tools to isolate the function elicited by a single signaling pathway in physiologically relevant cell types.

ER/K linked GPCR-G protein fusions systematically modulate second messenger response in cells

FRET and BRET approaches are well established for detecting ligand induced GPCR-G protein interactions in cells. Currently, FRET/BRET assays rely on co-expression of GPCR and G protein, and hence depend on the stoichiometry and expression levels of the donor and acceptor probes. On the other hand, GPCR-G protein fusions have been used extensively to understand the selectivity of GPCR signaling pathways. However, the signaling properties of fusion proteins are not consistent across GPCRs. In this study, we describe and characterize novel sensors based on the Systematic Protein Affinity Strength Modulation (SPASM) technique. Sensors consist of a GPCR and G protein tethered by an ER/K linker flanked by FRET probes. SPASM sensors are tested for the β2-, α1-, and α2- adrenergic receptors, and adenosine type 1 receptor (A₁R), tethered to Gαs-XL, Gαi₂, or Gαq subunits. Agonist stimulation of β2-AR and α2-AR increases FRET signal comparable to co-expressed FRET/BRET sensors. SPASM sensors also retain signaling through the endogenous G protein milieu. Importantly, ER/K linker length systematically tunes the GPCR-G protein interaction, with consequent modulation of second messenger signaling for cognate interactions. SPASM GPCR sensors serve the dual purpose of detecting agonist-induced changes in GPCR-G protein interactions, and linking these changes to downstream signaling.

Interaction of fenoterol stereoisomers with β2-adrenoceptor-G sα fusion proteins: antagonist and agonist competition binding

The specific interaction between G-protein-coupled receptors and ligand is the starting point for downstream signaling. Fenoterol stereoisomers were successfully used to probe ligand-specific activation (functional selectivity) of the β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) (Reinartz et al. 2015). In the present study, we extended the pharmacological profile of fenoterol stereoisomers using β2AR-Gsα fusion proteins in agonist and antagonist competition binding assays. Dissociations between binding affinities and effector potencies were found for (R,S')- and (S,S')-isomers of 4'-methoxy-1-naphthyl-fenoterol. Our data corroborate former studies on the importance of the aminoalkyl moiety of fenoterol derivatives for functional selectivity.

The role of ligands on the equilibria between functional states of a G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors exhibit a wide variety of signaling behaviors in response to different ligands. When a small label was incorporated on the cytosolic interface of transmembrane helix 6 (Cys-265), (19)F NMR spectra of the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) reconstituted in maltose/neopentyl glycol detergent micelles revealed two distinct inactive states, an activation intermediate state en route to activation, and, in the presence of a G protein mimic, a predominant active state. Analysis of the spectra as a function of temperature revealed that for all ligands, the activation intermediate is entropically favored and enthalpically disfavored. β2AR enthalpy changes toward activation are notably lower than those observed with rhodopsin, a likely consequence of basal activity and the fact that the ionic lock and other interactions stabilizing the inactive state of β2AR are weaker. Positive entropy changes toward activation likely reflect greater mobility (configurational entropy) in the cytoplasmic domain, as confirmed through an order parameter analysis. Ligands greatly influence the overall changes in enthalpy and entropy of the system and the corresponding changes in population and amplitude of motion of given states, suggesting a complex landscape of states and substates.

Cleavage-resistant fusion proteins of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and Gα(i1). Homotropic and heterotropic effects in the binding of ligands

BACKGROUND

G protein-coupled receptors fused to a Gα-subunit are functionally similar to their unfused counterparts. They offer an intriguing view into the nature of the receptor-G protein complex, but their usefulness depends upon the stability of the fusion.

METHODS

Fusion proteins of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and the α-subunit of G(i1) were expressed in CHO and Sf9 cells, extracted in digitonin-cholate, and examined for their binding properties and their electrophoretic mobility on western blots.

RESULTS

Receptor fused to native α(i1) underwent proteolysis near the point of fusion to release a fragment with the mobility of α(i1). The cleavage was prevented by truncation of the α-subunit at position 18. Binding of the agonist oxotremorine-M to the stable fusion protein from Sf9 cells was biphasic, and guanylylimidodiphosphate promoted an apparent interconversion of sites from higher to lower affinity. With receptor from CHO cells, the apparent capacity for N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine was 60% of that for [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate; binding at saturating concentrations of the latter was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner at low concentrations of unlabeled N-methylscopolamine.

CONCLUSIONS

A stable fusion protein of the M(2) receptor and truncated α(i1) resembles the native receptor-G protein complex with respect to the guanyl nucleotide-sensitive binding of agonists and the noncompetitive binding of antagonists.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Release of the α-subunit is likely to occur with other such fusion proteins, rendering the data ambiguous or misleading. The properties of a chemically stable fusion protein support the notion that signaling proceeds via a stable multimeric complex of receptor and G protein.

Fusion proteins as model systems for the analysis of constitutive GPCR activity

In many cases, the coexpression of GPCRs with G-proteins and/or regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS-proteins) allows a successful reconstitution of high-affinity agonist binding and functional responses. However, in some cases, coexpressed GPCRs and G-proteins interact inefficiently, resulting in weak [³⁵S]GTPγS- and steady-state GTPase assay signals. This may be, for example, caused by a rapid dissociation of the G-protein from the plasma membrane, as has been reported for Gα(s). Moreover, for a detailed characterization of GPCR/G-protein interactions, it may be required to work with a defined GPCR/G-protein stoichiometry and to avoid cross-interaction with endogenous G-proteins. Cross-talk to endogenous G-proteins has been shown to play a role in some mammalian expression systems. These problems can be addressed by the generation of GPCR-Gα fusion proteins and their expression in Sf9 insect cells. When the C-terminus of the receptor is fused to the N-terminus of the G-protein, a 1:1 stoichiometry of both proteins is achieved. In addition, the close proximity of GPCR and G-protein in fusion proteins leads to enhanced interaction efficiency, resulting in increased functional signals. This approach can also be extended to fusion proteins of GPCRs with RGS-proteins, specifically when steady-state GTP hydrolysis is used as read-out. GPCR-RGS fusion proteins optimize the interaction of RGS-proteins with coexpressed Gα subunits, since the location of the RGS-protein is close to the site of receptor-mediated G-protein activation. Moreover, in contrast to coexpression systems, GPCR-Gα and GPCR-RGS fusion proteins provide a possibility to imitate physiologically occurring interactions, for example, the precoupling of receptors and G-proteins or the formation of complexes between GPCRs, G-proteins and RGS-proteins (transducisomes). In this chapter, we describe the technique for the generation of fusion proteins and show the application of this approach for the characterization of constitutively active receptors.

Sf9 cells: a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of G protein-coupled receptors

The Sf9 cell/baculovirus expression system is widely used for high-level protein expression, often with the purpose of purification. However, proteins may also be functionally expressed in the defined Sf9 cell environment. According to the literature, the pharmacology of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) functionally reconstituted in Sf9 cells is similar to the receptor properties in mammalian cells. Sf9 cells express both recombinant GPCRs and G-proteins at much higher levels than mammalian cells. Sf9 cells can be grown in suspension culture, providing an inexpensive way of obtaining large protein amounts. Co-infection with various baculoviruses allows free combination of GPCRs with different G-proteins. The absence of constitutively active receptors in Sf9 cells provides an excellent signal-to background ratio in functional assays, allowing the detection of agonist-independent receptor activity and of small ligand-induced signals including partial agonistic and inverse agonistic effects. Insect cell Gα(i)-like proteins mostly do not couple productively to mammalian GPCRs. Thus, unlike in mammalian cells, Sf9 cells do not require pertussis toxin treatment to obtain a Gα(i)-free environment. Co-expression of GPCRs with Gα(i1), Gα(i2), Gα(i3) or Gα(o) in Sf9 cells allows the generation of a selectivity profile for these Gα(i/o)-isoforms. Additionally, GPCR-G-protein combinations can be compared with defined 1:1 stoichiometry by expressing GPCR-Gα fusion proteins. Sf9 cells can also be employed for ligand screening in medicinal chemistry programs, using radioligand binding assays or functional assays, like the steady-state GTPase- or [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay. This review shows that Sf9 cells are a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of GPCRs.

A CE assay for the detection of agonist-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity

A CE assay was developed for the detection of adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity stimulated at the AC and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) level. In the assay, cell membranes overexpressing GPCR and/or AC were incubated with modulators and substrate ATP to produce cAMP in a dose-dependent manner. In both the CE-UV and a radiochemical assay, the addition of forskolin (FSK) resulted in a two- to three-fold maximum increase in AC activity with EC50s of 4.2 +/- 0.7 and 2.4 +/- 0.7 microM, respectively, demonstrating that similar results were obtained by both assays. GPCR activation was also detected using cell membranes overexpressing AC and the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) fused to the stimulatory G protein. Terbutaline (beta2AR agonist) increased the basal rate of cAMP formation 1.7 +/- 0.1-fold resulting in an EC50 of 62 +/- 10 nM. The assay's ability to detect antagonists is demonstrated by the expected right-shifted EC50 of terbutaline by the beta2AR antagonist propranolol. The CE-UV assay offers advantages over the traditional radioactivity assay in terms of safety and labor.

Ligand screening system using fusion proteins of G protein-coupled receptors with G protein alpha subunits

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest families of genes in the human genome, and are the largest targets for drug development. Although a large number of GPCR genes have recently been identified, ligands have not yet been identified for many of them. Various assay systems have been employed to identify ligands for orphan GPCRs, but there is still no simple and general method to screen for ligands of such GPCRs, particularly of G(i)-coupled receptors. We have examined whether fusion proteins of GPCRs with G protein alpha subunit (Galpha) could be utilized for ligand screening and showed that the fusion proteins provide an effective method for the purpose. This article focuses on the followings: (1) characterization of GPCR genes and GPCRs, (2) identification of ligands for orphan GPCRs, (3) characterization of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins, and (4) identification of ligands for orphan GPCRs using GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins.

Activation and regulation of platelet-activating factor receptor: role of G(i) and G(q) in receptor-mediated chemotactic, cytotoxic, and cross-regulatory signals

Platelet-activating factor (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerolphosphocholine; PAF) induces leukocyte accumulation and activation at sites of inflammation via the activation of a specific cell surface receptor (PAFR). PAFR couples to both pertussis toxin-sensitive and pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins to activate leukocytes. To define the role(s) of G(i) and G(q) in PAF-induced leukocyte responses, two G-protein-linked receptors were generated by fusing G alpha(i3) (PAFR-G alpha(i3)) or G alpha(q) (PAFR-G alpha(q)) at the C terminus of PAFR. Rat basophilic leukemia cell line (RBL-2H3) stably expressing wild-type PAFR, PAFR-G alpha(i3), or PAFR-G alpha(q) was generated and characterized. All receptor variants bound PAF with similar affinities to mediate G-protein activation, intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, and secretion of beta-hexosaminidase. PAFR-G alpha(i3) and PAFR-G alpha(q) mediated greater GTPase activity in isolated membranes than PAFR but lower PI hydrolysis and secretion in whole cells. PAFR and PAFR-G alpha(i3), but not PAFR-G alpha(q), mediated chemotaxis to PAF. All three receptors underwent phosphorylation and desensitization upon exposure to PAF but only PAFR translocated beta arrestin to the cell membrane and internalized. In RBL-2H3 cells coexpressing the PAFRs along with CXCR1, IL-8 (CXCL8) cross-desensitized Ca2+ mobilization to PAF by all the receptors but only PAFR-G alpha(i3) activation cross-inhibited the response of CXCR1 to CXCL8. Altogether, the data indicate that G(i) exclusively mediates chemotactic and cross-regulatory signals of the PAFR, but both G(i) and G(q) activate PI hydrolysis and exocytosis by this receptor. Because chemotaxis and cross-desensitization are exclusively mediated by G(i), the data suggest that differential activation of both G(i) and G(q) by PAFR likely mediate specific as well as redundant signaling pathways.

A critical review of the methods for cleavage of fusion proteins with thrombin and factor Xa

Expression and purification of proteins in recombinant DNA systems is a powerful and widely used technique. Frequently there is the need to express the protein of interest as a fusion protein or chimeric protein. Fusion protein technology is frequently used to attach a "signal" which can be used for subsequent localization of the protein or a "carrier" which can be used to deliver a "therapeutic" such as a radioactive molecule to a specific site. In addition to these applications, fusion protein technology can be employed for several other useful purposes. Of these, the most frequent reason is to provide a 'tag' or 'handle' which will aid in the purification of the protein. Another useful purpose is to improve the expression or folding of the protein of interest. In these latter two situations, it is often necessary to remove the fusion partner before the recombinant protein of interest can be used for further studies. This removal process involves the insertion of a unique amino acid sequence that is susceptible to cleavage by a highly specific protease. Thrombin and factor Xa are the most frequently used proteases for this application. The purpose of this review is to discuss the application of thrombin and factor Xa for the cleavage of fusion proteins. It is emphasized that while these enzymes are quite specific for cleavage at the inserted cleavage site, proteolysis can frequently occur at other site(s) in the protein of interest. It is necessary to characterize the protein of interest after cleavage from the affinity label to assure that there are no changes in the covalent structure of the protein of interest. Examples are presented which describe the proteolysis of the protein of interest by either factor Xa or thrombin.

Principles: extending the utility of [35S]GTP gamma S binding assays

Ligand regulation of the binding of [35S]GTPgammaS is one of the most widely used methods to measure receptor activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. However, until recently this method was largely restricted to receptors that interact with members of the family of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G proteins. Here, the reasons for this restriction are discussed and recent approaches that have extended the utility of this method such that it is now suitable for analysis of the activation of any heterotrimeric G protein are reviewed.

Distinct interactions of G(salpha-long), G(salpha-short), and G(alphaolf) with GTP, ITP, and XTP

The G(s)-proteins G(salpha-short) (G(salphaS)) and G(salpha-long) (G(salphaL)), and the olfactory G(s) protein (G(alphaolf)) mediate activation of adenylyl cyclase by the beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)AR). Early studies showed that the purine nucleotides GTP, ITP, and XTP differentially support receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activation in various native membrane systems, but those findings have remained unexplained thus far. We systematically analyzed the effects of GTP, ITP, and XTP on the coupling of the beta(2)AR to G(salphaS), G(salphaL), and G(alphaolf), respectively, using fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 insect cells. Fusion proteins ensure defined receptor/G-protein stoichiometry and efficient coupling. At all three fusion proteins, GTP, ITP, and XTP exhibited unique profiles with respect to their potency and efficacy at disrupting high-affinity agonist binding and supporting adenylyl cyclase activation by partial and full agonists. Our data can be interpreted in two ways: (i) GTP, ITP, and XTP may stabilize different active conformations in various G(s)-proteins, or (ii) GTP, ITP, and XTP may differ from one another in the kinetics of interaction with various G(s)-proteins. Regardless of which of the two explanations is correct, our present data demonstrate that GTP, ITP, and XTP are highly efficient regulators of signal transduction mediated through a specific G-protein. Also discussed is the possibility that G-protein activation by ITP and XTP may be of relevance in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, a defect of the purine salvage pathway associated with abnormalities in various neurotransmitter systems.

Activation-induced subcellular redistribution of G alpha(s) is dependent upon its unique N-terminus

The heterotrimeric G protein subunit, alpha(s), can move reversibly from plasma membranes to cytoplasm in response to activation by GPCRs or activating mutations. We examined the importance of the unique N-terminus of alpha(s) in this translocation in cultured cells. alpha(s) contains a single site for palmitoylation in its N-terminus, and this was replaced by different plasma membrane targeting motifs. These N-terminal alpha(s) mutants were targeted properly to plasma membranes, capable of coupling activated GPCRs to effectors, and able to constitutively stimulate cAMP production when they also contained an activating mutation. However, when activated by a constitutively activating mutation or by agonist-activated beta-AR, these N-terminal alpha(s) mutants failed, for the most part, to undergo redistribution from plasma membranes to cytoplasm, as assayed by immunofluorescence microscopy, or from a particulate to soluble fraction, as assayed by subcellular fractionation. These results highlight the importance of the extreme N-terminus of alpha(s) and its single site of palmitoylation for facilitating activation-induced translocation and provide insight into the mechanism of this G protein trafficking event.

Agonists activate Gi1 alpha or Gi2 alpha fused to the human mu opioid receptor differently

As preferential coupling of opioid receptor to various inhibitory Galpha subunits is still under debate, we have investigated the selectivity of the human mu opioid receptor fused to a pertussis toxin insensitive C351I Gi1 alpha or C352I Gi2 alpha in stably transfected HEK 293 cells. Overall agonist binding affinities were increased for both fusion constructs when compared to the wild type receptor. [35 S]GTPgammaS binding was performed on pertussis toxin treated cells to monitor coupling efficiency of the fusion constructs. Upon agonist addition hMOR-C351I Gi1 a exhibited an activation profile similar to the non-fused receptor while hMOR-C352I Gi2 alpha was poorly activated. Interestingly no correlation could be drawn between agonist binding affinity and efficacy. Upon agonist addition, forskolin-stimulated cAMP production, as measured using a reporter gene assay, was inhibited by signals transduced via the fused Gi1 alpha and Gi2 alpha mainly. In contrast both fusion constructs were able to initiate ERK-MAPK phosphorylation via coupling to endogenous G proteins only. In conclusion our data indicate that hMOR couples more efficiently to Gi1 alpha than Gi2 alpha and that the coupling efficacy is clearly agonist-dependent.

The human 5-HT7 serotonin receptor splice variants: constitutive activity and inverse agonist effects

1. Using membranes from stably or transiently transfected HEK293 cells cultured in 5-HT-free medium and expressing the recombinant human 5-HT(7) receptor splice variants (h5-HT(7(a)), h5-HT(7(b)) and h5-HT(7(d))), we compared their abilities to constitutively activate adenylyl cyclase (AC). 2. All h5-HT(7) splice variants elevated basal and forskolin-stimulated AC. The basal AC activity was reduced by the 5-HT(7) antagonist methiothepin and this effect was blocked by mesulergine (neutral 5-HT(7) antagonist) indicating that the inhibitory effect of methiothepin is inverse agonism at the 5-HT(7) receptor. 3. Receptor density correlated poorly with constitutive AC activity in stable clonal cell lines and transiently transfected cells. Mean constitutive AC activity as a percentage of forskolin-stimulated AC was significantly higher for the h5-HT(7(b)) splice variant compared to the h5-HT(7(a)) and h5-HT(7(d)) splice variants but only in stable cell lines. 4. All eight 5-HT antagonists tested inhibited constitutive AC activity of all splice variants in a concentration-dependent manner. No differences in inverse agonist potencies (pIC(50)) were observed between the splice variants. The rank order of potencies was in agreement and highly correlated with antagonist potencies (pK(b)) determined by antagonism of 5-HT-stimulated AC activity (methiothepin >metergoline> mesulergine > or = clozapine > or = spiperone > or = ritanserin > methysergide > ketanserin). 5. The efficacy of inverse agonism was not receptor level dependent and varied for several 5-HT antagonists between membrane preparations of transiently and stably transfected cells. 6. It is concluded that the h5-HT(7) splice variants display similar constitutive activity and inverse agonist properties.

Engineering a V(2) vasopressin receptor agonist- and regulator of G-protein-signaling-sensitive G protein

It is extremely difficult to detect guanine nucleotide exchange or hydrolysis stimulated by receptors which couple to G(s)alpha. Furthermore, G(s)alpha is largely resistant to the GTPase-activating properties of RGS proteins. Coexpression of the vasopressin V(2) receptor with a series of chimeric G protein alpha subunits in which the C-terminal 6-12 amino acids of G(i1)alpha were replaced with the equivalent sequence of G(s)alpha allowed robust vasopressin-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Vasopressin did not stimulate the GTPase activity of fusion proteins between the V(2) receptor and either G(s)alpha or G(i1)alpha. However, it produced a concentration-dependent stimulation of V(max) for a V(2) receptor-G(i1)alpha/Gs6alpha fusion protein. This construct bound [(3)H]vasopressin with high affinity and this was competed by other ligands with rank order anticipated for the V(2) receptor. RGS1 enhanced vasopressin stimulation of V(2) receptor-G(i1)alpha/G(s)6alpha in a concentration-dependent manner. RGS-GAIP was substantially less potent. Enzyme kinetic analysis demonstrated that RGS1 increased both V(max) of the GTPase activity and the observed K(m) for GTP, consistent with RGS1 accelerating the rate of GTP hydrolysis of the chimeric G protein, whereas the agonist vasopressin accelerates guanine nucleotide exchange. This approach provides a sensitive assay for V(2) receptor agonist ligands and may be amenable to many other G(s)alpha-coupled receptors.

Increased production of active human beta(2)-adrenergic/G(alphas) fusion receptor in Sf-9 cells using nutrient limiting conditions

Using the baculovirus/insect-cell expression vector system, we succeeded in obtaining a high yield of active human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor/G(alphas) fusion protein. This was achieved following high cell density production under nutrient-limiting conditions using a very low multiplicity of infection (MOI). This approach was found to significantly reduce inactive protein accumulation that occurred when production was done using conventional high MOI procedures. The maximum specific and volumetric yields of active receptor using this strategy increased by factors of two- and sixfold, respectively. Our results suggest that the increase in the ratio of active/total protein produced results from production under nutrient limitation. Since low multiplicity of infection offers many advantages for large-scale applications, we suggest that this simple production method should be considered when optimizing expression of G-protein-coupled receptors and other complex proteins.

Analytical pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors by stoichiometric expression of the receptor and G(alpha) protein subunits

The description of a new family of recombinant proteins, which are constructed by the covalent fusion of the cDNA encoding a G protein-coupled receptor with that of a G(alpha) protein subunit, has recently been introduced as an original strategy to explore receptor pharmacology under defined experimental conditions. As such, a controlled 1:1 stoichiometry of receptor and G(alpha) protein expression can be achieved, as well as a forced spatial proximity to each other. Fusion proteins have been revealed as active at the receptor ligand binding level and functional at the G(alpha) protein and effector level. Insights on analytical pharmacological data are discussed for wild-type and mutant receptors interacting with a given G(alpha) protein subunit and different subtypes of either wild-type or mutant G(alpha) proteins activated by a single receptor subtype. A possible alteration of the receptor:G(alpha) protein selectivity may occur due either to the spatial proximity of both protein partners or to a constraint receptor state unable to accommodate to different G(alpha) protein states. Coactivation of endogenous G(alpha) proteins in host cells expressing a fusion protein has also been observed, but depends mainly on the coupling efficiency of the receptor and G(alpha) protein engaged in the fusion process. The ligand's apparent intrinsic activity has been shown to be either enhanced, attenuated, or unmodified when the functional responses of a fusion protein are compared to the coexpression of both fusion protein partners.

Molecular analysis of beta(2)-adrenoceptor coupling to G(s)-, G(i)-, and G(q)-proteins

The beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)AR) couples to the G-protein G(s) to activate adenylyl cyclase. Intriguingly, several studies have demonstrated that the beta(2)AR can also interact with G-proteins of the G(i)- and G(q)-family. To assess the efficiency of beta(2)AR interaction with various G-protein alpha-subunits (G(xalpha)), we expressed fusion proteins of the beta(2)AR with the long (G(salphaL)) and short (G(salphaS)) splice variants of G(salpha), the G(i)-proteins G(ialpha2) and G(ialpha3), and the G(q)-proteins G(qalpha) and G(16alpha) in Sf9 cells. Fusion proteins provide a rigorous approach for comparing the coupling of a given receptor to G(xalpha) because of the defined 1:1 stoichiometry of receptor and G-protein and the efficient coupling. Here, we show that the beta(2)AR couples to G(s)-, G(i)-, and G(q)-proteins as assessed by ternary complex formation and ligand-regulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding. The combined analysis of ternary complex formation, GTPgammaS binding, agonist efficacies, and agonist potencies revealed substantial differences in the interaction of the beta(2)AR with the various classes of G-proteins. Comparison of the coupling of the beta(2)AR and formyl peptide receptor to G(ialpha2) revealed receptor-specific differences in the kinetics of GTPgammaS binding. We also detected highly efficient stimulation of GTPgammaS dissociation from G(salphaL), but not from G(qalpha) and G(16alpha), by a beta(2)AR agonist. Moreover, we show that the 1:1 stoichiometry of receptor to G-protein in fusion proteins reflects the in vivo stoichiometry of receptor/G-protein coupling more closely than was previously assumed. Collectively, our data show 1) that the beta(2)AR couples differentially to G(s)-, G(i)-, and G(q)-proteins, 2) that there is ligand-specific coupling of the beta(2)AR to G-proteins, 3) that receptor-specific G-protein conformational states may exist, and 4) that nucleotide dissociation is an important mechanism for G-protein deactivation.

The regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 selectively enhances alpha 2A-adreoreceptor stimulation of the GTPase activity of Go1alpha and Gi2alpha

Agonist-stimulated high affinity GTPase activity of fusion proteins between the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor and the alpha subunits of forms of the G proteins G(i1), G(i2), G(i3), and G(o1), modified to render them insensitive to the action of pertussis toxin, was measured following transient expression in COS-7 cells. Addition of a recombinant regulator of G protein signaling protein, RGS4, did not significantly affect basal GTPase activity nor agonist stimulation of the fusion proteins containing Galpha(i1) and Galpha(i3) but markedly enhanced agonist-stimulation of the proteins containing Galpha(i2) and Galpha(o1.) The effect of RGS4 on the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) fusion protein was concentration-dependent with EC(50) of 30 +/- 3 nm and the potency of the receptor agonist UK14304 was reduced 3-fold by 100 nm RGS4. Equivalent reconstitution with Asn(88)-Ser RGS4 failed to enhance agonist function on the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) or alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2) fusion proteins. Enzyme kinetic analysis of the GTPase activity of the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) and alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2) fusion proteins demonstrated that RGS4 both substantially increased GTPase V(max) and significantly increased K(m) of the fusion proteins for GTP. The increase in K(m) for GTP was dependent upon RGS4 amount and is consistent with previously proposed mechanisms of RGS function. Agonist-stimulated GTPase turnover number in the presence of 100 nm RGS4 was substantially higher for alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) than for alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2). These studies demonstrate that although RGS4 has been described as a generic stimulator of the GTPase activity of G(i)-family G proteins, selectivity of this interaction and quantitative variation in its function can be monitored in the presence of receptor activation of the G proteins.

Fusion of beta 2-adrenergic receptor to G alpha s in mammalian cells: identification of a specific signal transduction species not characteristic of constitutive activation or precoupling

The forward and antegrade interactions that comprise the agonist receptor-G protein complex were studied in Chinese hamster fibroblasts transfected to express the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR), the beta(2)AR and the alpha-subunit of its cognate G protein (G(s)), and a protein consisting of the beta(2)AR fused at its carboxy terminus with G(alpha)(s) (beta(2)AR-G(s)). Expression levels were matched at approximately 600 fmol/mg. Basal adenylyl cyclase activities were increased with the fusion receptor membranes compared to coexpressed receptor plus G(alpha)(s), and to wild-type beta(2)AR (20.5 +/- 1.8 vs 9.0 +/- 0.88 vs 8.7 +/- 0.93 pmol min(-)(1) mg(-)(1)), confirming in mammalian cells that the fusion of beta(2)AR and G(alpha)(s) results in a state not attained by expression of unfused components. However, agonist-stimulated activities were not increased proportionally, such that the stimulation over basal of the beta(2)AR-G(s) fusion protein (1. 5-fold) was less than wild-type beta(2)AR (2.1-fold). Agonist competition studies performed in the absence of guanine nucleotide exhibited high-affinity binding sites with a lower K(H) (1.75 vs 8. 47 nM) and greater %R(H) (51% vs 44%) for beta(2)AR-G(s), but GppNHp failed to convert most of these to the low-affinity state. Functional studies with the inverse agonist ICI 118551 did not show enhanced efficacy or potency with the fusion protein. Adenylyl cyclase studies with three partial agonists with diverse structures (dobutamine, ritodrine, and phenylephrine) showed no enhancement of efficacy with beta(2)AR-G(s) and a minor trend toward enhanced potency. Taken together, these results indicate that the tethering of G(alpha)(s) to the beta(2)AR causes a conformational change in the receptor that stabilizes a species "trapped" between the non-guanine nucleotide-bound state and the GTP-bound form. Functionally the receptor is not characterized by a consistent pattern of properties ascribed to other states such as constitutive activation or precoupling, but rather represents a unique state in the transition from high- to low-affinity forms.

Insights into ligand pharmacology using receptor-G-protein fusion proteins

Production of chimeric DNAs in which the 5' end of G-protein alpha-subunits are linked directly to the 3' tail of a G-protein-coupled receptor has recently offered an unusual strategy to explore the detailed pharmacology of receptor-G-protein interactions. Expression of such fusion proteins ensures a 1:1 stoichiometry of receptor and G-protein expression and their proximity to each other. The capacity of such fusion proteins to be regarded as agonist-activated GTPases that allow simple enzyme kinetics to be applied to issues of ligand efficacy will be considered. In addition, the effects of point mutations, in both receptors and G proteins, on ligand function are particularly amenable to the types of robust quantitative analyses that can be produced using such fusion proteins.

Quantitative analysis of formyl peptide receptor coupling to g(i)alpha(1), g(i)alpha(2), and g(i)alpha(3)

The human formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is a prototypical G(i) protein-coupled receptor, but little is known about quantitative aspects of FPR-G(i) protein coupling. To address this issue, we fused the FPR to G(i)alpha(1), G(i)alpha(2), and G(i)alpha(3) and expressed the fusion proteins in Sf9 insect cells. Fusion of a receptor to Galpha ensures a defined 1:1 stoichiometry of the signaling partners. By analyzing high affinity agonist binding, the kinetics of agonist- and inverse agonist-regulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding and GTP hydrolysis and photolabeling of Galpha, we demonstrate highly efficient coupling of the FPR to fused G(i)alpha(1), G(i)alpha(2), and G(i)alpha(3) without cross-talk of the receptor to insect cell G proteins. The FPR displayed high constitutive activity when coupled to all three G(i)alpha isoforms. The K(d) values of high affinity agonist binding were approximately 100-fold lower than the EC(50) (concentration that gives half-maximal stimulation) values of agonist for GTPase activation. Based on the B(max) values of agonist saturation binding and ligand-regulated GTPgammaS binding, it was previously proposed that the FPR activates G proteins catalytically, i.e. one FPR activates several G(i) proteins. Analysis of agonist saturation binding, ligand-regulated GTPgammaS saturation binding and quantitative immunoblotting with membranes expressing FPR-G(i)alpha fusion proteins and nonfused FPR now reveals that FPR agonist binding greatly underestimates the actual FPR expression level. Our data show the following: (i) the FPR couples to G(i)alpha(1), G(i)alpha(2), and G(i)alpha(3) with similar efficiency; (ii) the FPR can exist in a state of low agonist affinity that couples efficiently to G proteins; and (iii) in contrast to the previously held view, the FPR appears to activate G(i) proteins linearly and not catalytically.

Activation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-Galpha(s) complex leads to rapid depalmitoylation and inhibition of repalmitoylation of both the receptor and Galpha(s)

Palmitoylation is unique among lipid modifications in that it is reversible. In recent years, dynamic palmitoylation of G protein alpha subunits and of their cognate receptors has attracted considerable attention. However, very little is known concerning the acylation/deacylation cycle of the proteins in relation to their activity status. In particular, the relative contribution of the activation and desensitization of the signaling unit to the regulation of the receptors and G proteins palmitoylation state is unknown. To address this issue, we took advantage of the fact that a fusion protein composed of the stimulatory alpha subunit of trimeric G protein (Galpha(s)) covalently attached to the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) as a carboxyl-terminal extension (beta(2)AR-Galpha(s)) can be stimulated by agonists but does not undergo rapid inactivation, desensitization, or internalization. When expressed in Sf9 cells, both the receptor and the Galpha(s) moieties of the fusion protein were found to be palmitoylated via thioester linkage. Stimulation with the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol led to a rapid depalmitoylation of both the beta(2)AR and Galpha(s) and inhibited repalmitoylation. The extent of depalmitoylation induced by a series of agonists was correlated (0.99) with their intrinsic efficacy to stimulate the adenylyl cyclase activity. However, forskolin-stimulated cAMP production did not affect the palmitoylation state of beta(2)AR-Galpha(s), indicating that the agonist-promoted depalmitoylation is linked to conformational changes and not to second messenger generation. Given that, upon activation, the fusion protein mimics the activated receptor-G protein complex but cannot undergo desensitization, the data demonstrate that early steps in the activation process lead to the depalmitoylation of both receptor and G protein and that repalmitoylation requires later events that cannot be accommodated by the activated fusion protein.

GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins: molecular analysis of receptor-G-protein coupling

The efficiency of interactions between G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) is greatly influenced by the absolute and relative densities of these proteins in the plasma membrane. The study of these interactions has been facilitated by the use of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins, which are formed by the fusion of GPCR to Galpha. These fusion proteins ensure a defined 1:1 stoichiometry of GPCR to Galpha and force the physical proximity of the signalling partners. Thus, fusion of GPCR to Galpha enhances coupling efficiency can be used to study aspects of receptor-G-protein coupling that could not otherwise be examined by co-expressing GPCRs and G proteins as separate proteins. The results of studies that have made use of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins will be discussed in this article, along with the strengths and limitations of this approach.