Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptor chimeras identify domains responsible for the specificity of ligand binding and activation

Differential Responses of the GLP-1 and GLP-2 Receptors to N-Terminal Modification of a Dual Agonist

Class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), collectively, respond to a diverse repertoire of extracellular polypeptide agonists and transmit the encoded messages to cytosolic partners. To fulfill these tasks, these highly mobile receptors must interconvert among conformational states in response to agonists. We recently showed that conformational mobility in polypeptide agonists themselves plays a role in activation of one class B1 GPCR, the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Exchange between helical and nonhelical conformations near the N-termini of agonists bound to the GLP-1R was revealed to be critical for receptor activation. Here, we ask whether agonist conformational mobility plays a role in the activation of a related receptor, the GLP-2R. Using variants of the hormone GLP-2 and the designed clinical agonist glepaglutide (GLE), we find that the GLP-2R is quite tolerant of variations in α-helical propensity near the agonist N-terminus, which contrasts with signaling at the GLP-1R. A fully α-helical conformation of the bound agonist may be sufficient for GLP-2R signal transduction. GLE is a GLP-2R/GLP-1R dual agonist, and the GLE system therefore enables direct comparison of the responses of these two GPCRs to a single set of agonist variants. This comparison supports the conclusion that the GLP-1R and GLP-2R differ in their response to variations in helical propensity near the agonist N-terminus. The data offer a basis for development of new hormone analogues with distinctive and potentially useful activity profiles; for example, one of the GLE analogues is a potent agonist of the GLP-2R but also a potent antagonist of the GLP-1R, a novel form of polypharmacology.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide blockade suppresses tumor growth by regulating macrophage polarization and function in CT26 tumor-bearing mice

Macrophages are a major population of immune cells in solid cancers, especially colorectal cancers. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are commonly divided into M1-like (tumor suppression) and M2-like (tumor promotion) phenotypes. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is an immunoregulatory neuropeptide with a potent anti-inflammatory function. Inhibition of VIP signaling has been shown to increase CD8⁺ T cell proliferation and function in viral infection and lymphoma. However, the role of VIP in macrophage polarization and function in solid tumors remains unknown. Here, we demonstrated that conditioned medium from CT26 (CT26-CM) cells enhanced M2-related marker and VIP receptor (VPAC) gene expression in RAW264.7 macrophages. VIP hybrid, a VIP antagonist, enhanced M1-related genes but reduced Mrc1 gene expression and increased phagocytic ability in CT26-CM-treated RAW264.7 cells. In immunodeficient SCID mice, VIP antagonist alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody attenuated CT26 tumor growth compared with the control. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes found that VIP antagonist increased M1/M2 ratios and macrophage phagocytosis of CT26-GFP cells. Furthermore, Vipr2 gene silencing or VPAC2 activation affected the polarization of CT26-CM-treated RAW264.7 cells. In conclusion, the inhibition of VIP signaling enhanced M1 macrophage polarization and macrophage phagocytic function, resulting in tumor regression in a CT26 colon cancer model.

An Overview of VPAC Receptors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Biological Role and Clinical Significance

The axis comprised by the Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) and its G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), VPAC1, and VPAC2, belong to the B1 family and signal through Gs or Gq proteins. VPAC receptors seem to preferentially interact with Gs in inflammatory cells, rather than Gq, thereby stimulating adenylate cyclase activity. cAMP is able to trigger various downstream pathways, mainly the canonical PKA pathway and the non-canonical cAMP-activated guanine nucleotide exchange factor (EPAC) pathway. Classically, the presence of VPACs has been confined to the plasma membrane; however, VPAC1 location has been described in the nuclear membrane in several cell types such as activated Th cells, where they are also functional. VPAC receptor signaling modulates a number of biological processes by tipping the balance of inflammatory mediators in macrophages and other innate immune cells, modifying the expression of TLRs, and inhibiting MMPs and the expression of adhesion molecules. Receptor signaling also downregulates coagulation factors and acute-phase proteins, promotes Th2 over Th1, stimulates Treg abundance, and finally inhibits a pathogenic Th17 profile. Thus, the VIP axis signaling regulates both the innate and adaptive immune responses in several inflammatory/autoimmune diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex autoimmune disease that develops on a substrate of genetically susceptible individuals and under the influence of environmental factors, as well as epigenetic mechanisms. It is a heterogeneous disease with different pathogenic mechanisms and variable clinical forms between patients with the same diagnosis. The knowledge of VIP signaling generated in both animal models and human ex vivo studies can potentially be translated to clinical reality. Most recently, the beneficial effects of nanoparticles of VIP self-associated with sterically stabilized micelles have been reported in a murine model of RA. Another novel research area is beginning to define the receptors as biomarkers in RA, with their expression levels shown to be associated with the activity of the disease and patients-reported impairment. Therefore, VPAC expression together VIP genetic variants could allow patients to be stratified at the beginning of the disease with the purpose of guiding personalized treatment decisions.

Development by Genetic Immunization of Monovalent Antibodies Against Human Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Receptor 1 (VPAC1), New Innovative, and Versatile Tools to Study VPAC1 Receptor Function

Multi-membrane spanning proteins, such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ion channels, are extremely difficult to purify as native proteins. Consequently, the generation of antibodies that recognize the native conformation can be challenging. By combining genetic immunization, phage display, and biopanning, we identified a panel of monovalent antibodies (nanobodies) targeting the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 (VPAC1) receptor. The nine unique nanobodies that were classified into four different families based on their CDR3 amino acid sequence and length, were highly specific for the human receptor and bind VPAC1 with moderate affinity. They all recognize a similar epitope localized in the extracellular N-terminal domain of the receptor and distinct from the orthosteric binding site. In agreement with binding studies, which showed that the nanobodies did not interfere with VIP binding, all nanobodies were devoid of any functional properties. However, we observed that the binding of two nanobodies was slightly increased in the presence of VPAC1 agonists [vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-27 (PACAP-27)], but decreased in the presence of VPAC1 antagonist. As no evidence of allosteric activity was seen in VIP binding studies nor in functional assays, it is, therefore, possible that the two nanobodies may behave as very weak allosteric modulators of VPAC1, detectable only in some sensitive settings, but not in others. We demonstrated that the fluorescently labeled nanobodies detect VPAC1 on the surface of human leukocytes as efficiently as a reference mouse monoclonal antibody. We also developed a protocol allowing efficient detection of VPAC1 by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded human gastrointestinal tissue sections. Thus, these nanobodies constitute new original tools to further investigate the role of VPAC1 in physiological and pathological conditions.

Molecular basis for high affinity and selectivity of peptide antagonist, Bantag-1, for the orphan BB3 receptor

Bombesin-receptor-subtype-3 (BB3 receptor) is a G-protein-coupled-orphan-receptor classified in the mammalian Bombesin-family because of high homology to gastrin-releasing peptide (BB2 receptor)/neuromedin-B receptors (BB1 receptor). There is increased interest in BB3 receptor because studies primarily from knockout-mice suggest it plays roles in energy/glucose metabolism, insulin-secretion, as well as motility and tumor-growth. Investigations into its roles in physiological/pathophysiological processes are limited because of lack of selective ligands. Recently, a selective, peptide-antagonist, Bantag-1, was described. However, because BB3 receptor has low-affinity for all natural, Bn-related peptides, little is known of the molecular basis of its high-affinity/selectivity. This was systematically investigated in this study for Bantag-1 using a chimeric-approach making both Bantag-1 loss-/gain-of-affinity-chimeras, by exchanging extracellular (EC) domains of BB3/BB2 receptor, and using site-directed-mutagenesis. Receptors were transiently expressed and affinities determined by binding studies. Bantag-1 had >5000-fold selectivity for BB3 receptor over BB2/BB1 receptors and substitution of the first EC-domain (EC1) in loss-/gain-of affinity-chimeras greatly affected affinity. Mutagenesis of each amino acid difference in EC1 between BB3 receptor/BB2 receptor showed replacement of His(107) in BB3 receptor by Lys(107) (H107K-BB3 receptor-mutant) from BB2 receptor, decreased affinity 60-fold, and three replacements [H107K, E11D, G112R] decreased affinity 500-fold. Mutagenesis in EC1's surrounding transmembrane-regions (TMs) demonstrated TM2 differences were not important, but R127Q in TM3 alone decreased affinity 400-fold. Additional mutants in EC1/TM3 explored the molecular basis for these changes demonstrated in EC1, particularly important is the presence of aromatic-interactions by His(107), rather than hydrogen-bonding or charge-charge interactions, for determining Bantag-1 high affinity/selectivity. In regard to Arg(127) in TM3, both hydrogen-bonding and charge-charge interactions contribute to the high-affinity/selectivity for Bantag-1.

Role of VPAC1 and VPAC2 in VIP mediated inhibition of rat pulmonary artery and aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation

Recent studies have suggested the potential use of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). An understanding of the mechanism of action of VIP is important for the development of new therapies for PAH. The biological effects of VIP are mediated by two type II guanine nucleotide binding protein (G-protein)-coupled receptors VIP/PACAP (pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide) receptor type1 (VPAC1) and VIP/PACAP receptor type 2 (VPAC2). In the present study, the distribution and role of these receptors were investigated and compared in cultured smooth muscle cells from rat aorta and pulmonary artery, as well as in fixed tissue sections of the aorta and pulmonary artery. Western blot analysis, RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry showed the expression of both VIP receptors in tissue sections of the aorta and pulmonary artery as well as in cultured smooth muscle cells from these vessels. The application of a specific antagonist of VPAC1 resulted in a small release from VIP induced inhibition of cell proliferation. In contrast (VIP 6-28; 300nM) which is an antagonist against both receptors resulted in a significant restoration of proliferation. The expression of cAMP was reduced in the presence of VIP 6-28 and slightly decreased by VPAC1 antagonist. These findings suggest a dual role for VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors in mediating the antiproliferative effects of VIP with VPAC2 appearing to play a more dominant role.

VPAC and PAC receptors: From ligands to function

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and the pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptides (PACAPs) share 68% identity at the amino acid level and belong to the secretin peptide family. Following the initial discovery of VIP almost four decades ago a substantial amount of knowledge has been presented describing the mechanisms of action, distribution and pleiotropic functions of these related peptides. It is now known that the physiological actions of these widely distributed peptides are produced through activation of three common G-protein coupled receptors (VPAC(1), VPAC(2) and PAC(1)R) which preferentially stimulate adenylate cyclase and increase intracellular cAMP, although stimulation of other intracellular messengers, including calcium and phospholipase D, has been reported. Using a range of in vitro and in vivo approaches, including cell-based functional assays, transgenic animals and rodent models of disease, VPAC/PAC receptor activation has been associated with numerous physiological processes (e.g. control of circadian rhythms) and clinical conditions (e.g. pulmonary hypertension), which underlies on-going research efforts and makes these peptides and their cognate receptors attractive targets for the pharmaceutical industry. However, despite the considerable interest in VPAC/PAC receptors and the processes which they mediate, there is still a paucity of selective and available, non-peptide ligands, which has hindered further advances in this field both at the basic research and clinical level. This review summarises the current knowledge of VIP/PACAP and the VPAC/PAC receptors with regard to their distribution, pharmacology, signalling pathways, splice variants and finally, the utility of animal models in exploring their physiological roles.

Intein-mediated rapid purification and characterization of a novel recombinant agonist for VPAC2

In order to obtain the recombinant VPAC2 agonist efficiently by intein-mediated single column purification, a gene encoding 32-amino acids peptide was designed, synthesized and cloned into Escherichia coli expression vector pKYB. The recombinant vector pKY-ROM was transferred into E. coli ER2566 cells and the target protein was over-expressed as a fusion to the N-terminus of a self-cleavable affinity tag. After the rMROM-intein-CBD fusion protein was purified by chitin-affinity chromatography, the self-cleavage activity of the intein was induced by beta-mercaptoethanol and the rMROM with the homogeneity over 95% was released from the chitin-bound intein tag. The recombinant linear rMROM competitively displaced [125I] PACAP38 on VPAC2 with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 60 +/- 5 nM, whereas the IC50 of rMROM at human VPAC1 was observed up to 10 microM and no binding was detected at PAC1. rMROM stimulated the cAMP accumulation in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the human VPAC2 with a half-maximal stimulatory concentration (EC50) of 0.6 nM, which was 500-fold less potent at VPAC1and had no activity on PAC1. An efficient production procedure of a novel recombinant VPAC2-selective agonist was established.

Contribution of the carboxyl terminus of the VPAC1 receptor to agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and recycling

When exposed to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), the human wild type VPAC1 receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells is rapidly phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized in the endosomal compartment and is not re-expressed at the cell membrane within 2 h after agonist removal. The aims of the present work were first to correlate receptor phosphorylation level to internalization and recycling, measured by flow cytometry and in some cases by confocal microscopy using a monoclonal antibody that did not interfere with ligand binding, and second to identify the phosphorylated Ser/Thr residues. Combining receptor mutations and truncations allowed identification of Ser250 (in the second intracellular loop), Thr429, Ser435, Ser448 or Ser449, and Ser455 (all in the distal part of the C terminus) as candidates for VIP-stimulated phosphorylation. The effects of single mutations were not additive, suggesting alternative phosphorylation sites in mutated receptors. Replacement of all of the Ser/Thr residues in the carboxyl-terminal tail and truncation of the domain containing these residues completely inhibited VIP-stimulated phosphorylation and receptor internalization. There was, however, no direct correlation between receptor phosphorylation and internalization; in some truncated and mutated receptors, a 70% reduction in phosphorylation had little effect on internalization. In contrast to results obtained on the wild type and all of the mutated or truncated receptors that still underwent phosphorylation, internalization of the severely truncated receptor was reversed within 2 h of incubation in the absence of the agonist. Receptor recovery was blocked by monensin, an endosome inhibitor.

Comparative efficacy of VIP and analogs on activation and internalization of the recombinant VPAC2 receptor expressed in CHO cells

Using a monoclonal antibody interacting with the extracellular amino-terminus of the human VPAC2 receptor but that did not interfere with ligand binding, we measured by flow cytometry receptor internalization and trafficking induced by full agonists, partial agonists and an antagonist in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the recombinant receptor. The agonists, but not the antagonist, induced a rapid, dose-dependent receptor internalization blocked by hypertonic sucrose that was more pronounced for the VIP analog N-hexanoyl-VIP (80%) than for VIP and Ro 25-1553 (50%) and the [A11]-VIP (20%). Re-expression of the receptors at the membrane was achieved within two hours after exposure to VIP and Ro 25-1553 was blocked by 25 microM monensin but not by 10 microg/ml cycloheximide. Re-expression was much slower after exposure to the acylated peptide and was blocked by preincubation with 25 microM monensin and 10 microg/ml cycloheximide.

Hexanoylation of a VPAC2 receptor-preferring ligand markedly increased its selectivity and potency

We synthesized a VIP analog that combines mutations that decrease the affinity for the VPAC1 receptor but maintain a high affinity for the VPAC2 receptor with an amino-terminal hexanoylation that increases the affinity for the VPAC2 receptor with a limited decrease in the affinity of the VPAC1 receptor. The resulting Hexanoyl[A19,K(27,28)]VIP had the expected properties of a high affinity for the VPAC2 receptor and a low affinity for the VPAC1 receptor and also a low affinity for the PAC1 and secretin receptors. With a 1000-fold preference for the VPAC2 receptor and a IC50 value of binding of 1 nM, this compound is the most potent and the most selective agonist presently described.

Evidence for a direct interaction between the Thr11 residue of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and Tyr184 located in the first extracellular loop of the VPAC2 receptor

We developed previously VPAC(1) [vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) receptor]>VPAC(2) receptor selective ligands. Replacement of the VIP-Thr(11) by an Arg(11) in these ligands contributed to their selectivity: Arg(11)-VIP had a 200-fold lower affinity when compared with VIP at VPAC(2) receptors as opposed to 3- to 5-fold higher affinity at VPAC(1) receptors. Comparison of the binding and functional properties of related VIP analogues suggested that the VPAC(1) selectivity of Arg(11)-VIP was due to the loss of a hydrogen bond between the hydroxy group of Thr residue and the VPAC(2) receptor, steric hindrance between the Arg side chain and the VPAC(2) receptor and charge attraction by the VPAC(1) receptor. Comparison of the ability of VIP analogues to activate adenylate cyclase through chimaeric VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) and VPAC(2)/VPAC(1) receptors indicated that the first extracellular receptor loop carried most of the VPAC(2) receptors' ability to discriminate VIP from Arg(11)-VIP. Based on results obtained for a truncated VPAC(2) receptor and the closely related PACAP-preferring receptor (PAC(1)) and secretin receptors, we hypothesized that Thr(11) interacted with the VPAC(2) receptor Tyr(184) (similar to the VPAC(1) receptor Phe(200) residue). The Y184F (Tyr(184)-->Phe) VPAC(2) mutant lost the ability to discriminate VIP from Val(11)-VIP, and the F200Y VPAC(1) mutant acquired the ability to discriminate the natural peptide from Val(11)-VIP. These results support the hypothesis that the hydroxy group of the native VIP-Thr(11) side chain can indeed form a hydrogen bond with the Tyr side chain in the VPAC(2) receptor.

Molecular pharmacology and structure of VPAC Receptors for VIP and PACAP

VIP and PACAP are two prominent neuropeptides which share two common G protein-coupled receptors VPAC1 and VPAC2 while PACAP has an additional specific receptor PAC1. This paper reviews the present knowledge regarding three aspects of VPAC receptors including: (i). receptor specificity towards natural VIP-related peptides and pharmacology of synthetic agonists or antagonists; (ii). receptor signaling; (iii). molecular basis of ligand-receptor interaction as determined by site-directed mutagenesis, construction of receptor chimeras and structural modeling.

Two tyrosine residues in the first transmembrane helix of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors play a role in supporting the active conformation

1: We investigated the human vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) receptors VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) mutated at conserved tyrosine residues in the first transmembrane helix (VPAC(1) receptor Y146A and Y150A and VPAC(2) receptor Y130A and Y134A). 2: [(125)I]-Acetyl-His(1) [D-Phe(2), K(15), R(16), L(27)]-VIP (1-7)/GRF (8-27) (referred to as [(125)I]-VPAC(1) antagonist) labelled VPAC(1) binding sites, that displayed high and low affinities for VIP (IC(50) values and per cent of high affinity binding sites: wild-type, 1 nM (57+/-9%) and 160 nM; Y146A, 30 nM (40+/-8%) and 800 nM; Y150A, 4 nM (27+/-8%) and 300 nM). [R(16)]-VIP behaved as a "super agonist" at both mutated VPAC(1) receptors and the efficacies of VIP analogues modified in positions 1, 3 and 6 were significantly decreased. 3: VIP was less potent at the Y130A and Y134A mutated VPAC(2) receptors (EC(50) 200 and 400 nM, respectively) than at the wild-type VPAC(2) receptor (EC(50) 7 nM). Furthermore, [hexanoyl-His(1)]-VIP behaved as a "super agonist" at the two mutated VPAC(2) receptors, and VIP analogues modified in positions 1, 3 and 6 were less potent and efficient at the mutated than at wild-type VPAC(2) receptors. However, the Y130A and Y134A mutants could not be studied in binding assays. 4: Our results suggest that the conserved tyrosine residues do not interact directly with the VIP His(1), Asp(3) or Phe(6) residues (that are necessary for receptor activation), but stabilize the correct active receptor conformation.

Proline residue 280 in the second extracellular loop (EC2) of the VPAC2 receptor is essential for the receptor structure

Inspection of the amino acid sequence of the human VPAC1 and the VPAC2 receptors after alignment of the conserved residues indicates that the second extracellular loop (EC2) is one amino acid shorter in the VPAC1 receptor due to the lack of a proline residue in position 294. We hypothesized that this could be of importance for receptor structure and/or for ligand recognition. Insertion by directed mutagenesis of a proline in that position (<Pro>294 VPAC1) had little consequence on the binding of several agonists but reduced the affinity for the VPAC1 antagonist. Coupling of the <Pro>294 VPAC1 receptor to adenylate cyclase was improved, as demonstrated by an increased affinity for VIP and other agonists, and by a shift of the VPAC1 antagonist to partial agonist behavior. Deletion of the proline 280 (DeltaPro280 VPAC2) in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the apparent affinity for all the agonists tested. Replacement of the proline by a glycine residue had a smaller effect on the ligands affinities. The proline residue in the VPAC2 receptor EC2 is thus essential for the receptor structure, and the EC2 domain is involved in ligand recognition and receptor functionality.

Two basic residues of the h-VPAC1 receptor second transmembrane helix are essential for ligand binding and signal transduction

We mutated the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) Asp(3) residue and two VPAC(1) receptor second transmembrane helix basic residues (Arg(188) and Lys(195)). VIP had a lower affinity for R188Q, R188L, K195Q, and K195I VPAC(1) receptors than for VPAC(1) receptors. [Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP had lower affinities than VIP for VPAC(1) receptors but higher affinities for the mutant receptors; the two basic amino acids facilitated the introduction of the negatively charged aspartate inside the transmembrane domain. The resulting interaction was necessary for receptor activation. 1/[Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP were partial agonists at VPAC(1) receptors; 2/VIP did not fully activate the K195Q, K195I, R188Q, and R188L VPAC(1) receptors; a VIP analogue ([Arg(16)] VIP) was more efficient than VIP at the four mutated receptors; and [Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP were more efficient than VIP at the R188Q and R188L VPAC(1) receptors; 3/the [Asp(3)] negative charge did not contribute to the recognition of the VIP(1) antagonist, [AcHis(1),D-Phe(2),Lys(15),Arg(16),Leu(27)] VIP ()/growth hormone releasing factor (8-27). This is the first demonstration that, to activate the VPAC(1) receptor, the Asp(3) side chain of VIP must penetrate within the transmembrane domain, in close proximity to two highly conserved basic amino acids from transmembrane 2.

Tryptophan 67 in the human VPAC(1) receptor: crucial role for VIP binding

The human receptor subtype for VIP and PACAP, referred to as VPAC(1) receptor, has a large N-terminal extracellular domain which is critical for VIP binding. We further investigated this domain by mutating 12 amino acid residues which could participate in the formation of a tight bend (W67) or a coiled coil motif. They were changed to alanine (A) and the cDNAs were transiently transfected into Cos cells. All mutants but W67A exhibited K(d) values similar to that of the wild-type receptor. For the W67A mutant, no specific (125)I-VIP binding could be observed. Mutants at the W67 site were further characterized after stable transfection of epitope-tagged VPAC(1) receptor-GFP fusion proteins into CHO cells. W67A, W67E, W67H, and W67K mutants neither bound VIP nor mediated adenylyl cyclase activation by VIP. The W67F mutant mediated stimulation of adenylyl cyclase only at high VIP concentrations. Microscopic analysis and antibody binding experiments showed that all mutants were similarly expressed at the cell surface of CHO cells. Therefore tryptophan 67 in the human VPAC(1) receptor plays a crucial role in VIP binding due, in part, to its aromatic moiety.

Identification of key residues for interaction of vasoactive intestinal peptide with human VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors and development of a highly selective VPAC1 receptor agonist. Alanine scanning and molecular modeling of the peptide

The widespread neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) has two receptors VPAC(1) and VPAC(2). Solid-phase syntheses of VIP analogs in which each amino acid has been changed to alanine (Ala scan) or glycine was achieved and each analog was tested for: (i) three-dimensional structure by ab initio molecular modeling; (ii) ability to inhibit (125)I-VIP binding (K(i)) and to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity (EC(50)) in membranes from cell clones stably expressing human recombinant VPAC(1) or VPAC(2) receptor. The data show that substituting residues at 14 positions out of 28 in VIP resulted in a >10-fold increase of K(i) or EC(50) at the VPAC(1) receptor. Modeling of the three-dimensional structure of native VIP (central alpha-helice from Val(5) to Asn(24) with random coiled N and C terminus) and analogs shows that substitutions of His(1), Val(5), Arg(14), Lys(15), Lys(21), Leu(23), and Ile(26) decreased biological activity without altering the predicted structure, supporting that those residues directly interact with VPAC(1) receptor. The interaction of the analogs with human VPAC(2) receptor is similar to that observed with VPAC(1) receptor, with three remarkable exceptions: substitution of Thr(11) and Asn(28) by alanine increased K(i) for binding to VPAC(2) receptor; substitution of Tyr(22) by alanine increased EC(50) for stimulating adenylyl cyclase activity through interaction with the VPAC(2) receptor. By combining 3 mutations at positions 11, 22, and 28, we developed the [Ala(11,22,28)]VIP analog which constitutes the first highly selective (>1,000-fold) human VPAC(1) receptor agonist derived from VIP ever described.

Evidence that the lizard helospectin peptides are O-glycosylated

Six forms of helospectin (a vasoactive intestinal peptide analogue) were purified from the venom of the Heloderma horridum lizard. Their identification was performed by combining sequencing by automated Edman degradation and electrospray mass spectrometry analysis on the complete peptides and their tryptic fragments. The products resulting from the action of an O-glycosidase were also analysed. Two forms were identified as the previously named Hs1 and Hs2 of 38 and 37 amino-acid residues, respectively. Two forms corresponded to Hs1 and Hs2 O-glycosylated by a N-acetylhexosamine-hexose motif attached to the Ser32 residue. Two other forms were not completely characterized but might correspond to the O-glycosylated forms bearing a phosphate or a sulfate group. The glycosylation did not affect the capacity of the helospectins to recognize and to activate the human and the rat VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors.

Characterization of a novel VPAC(1) selective agonist and identification of the receptor domains implicated in the carboxyl-terminal peptide recognition

Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) interacts with a high affinity to two subclasses of G protein coupled receptors named VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), and has a 3 - 10 fold preference for VPAC(1) over VPAC(2) receptors. Selective ligands for each receptor subclass were recently described. [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) and [L(22)]-VIP are two selective VPAC(1) agonists. Chimaeric human VPAC(2)-VPAC(1) recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells were used to identify the receptor domains implicated in these two selective ligands recognition. The VPAC(2) preference for [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 27) over [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) did not require the receptor's NH(2)-terminus domain but involved the whole transmembrane domain. In contrast, the selectivity of [L(22)]-VIP depended only on the presence of the NH(2) terminus and EC(2) domains of the VPAC(1) receptor. The present data support the idea that in the GPCR-B family of receptors the different selective ligands require different domains for their selectivity, and that the peptides carboxyl terminal sequence (amino acids 24 - 27) folds back on the transmembrane receptor domain, close to the peptides, aminoterminus.