Latex allergy in subjects who had undergone multiple surgical procedures for bladder exstrophy: relationship with clinical intervention and atopic diseases

Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Pregnancy in the Female Bladder Exstrophy Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Classic bladder exstrophy (BE) remains one of the most demanding reconstructive challenges encountered in urology. In female BE patients, the long-term sequela of both primary and revision genitoplasty, as well as intrinsic pelvic floor deficits, predispose adult women to significant issues with sexual function, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and complexities with reproductive health.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contemporary data suggest 30-50% of women with BE develop prolapse at a mean age of 16 years. Most women will require revision genitoplasty for successful sexual function, although in some series over 40% report dyspareunia. Current management for pregnancy includes elective cesarean section with involvement of high-risk obstetrics and urologic surgery. This review encapsulates contemporary concepts of etiology, prevalence, and management of POP and pregnancy in the adult female BE patient.

Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period

The incidence of anaphylaxis during anesthesia has been reported to range from 1 in 4000 to 1 in 25,000. Anaphylaxis during anesthesia can present as cardiovascular collapse, airway obstruction, and/or skin manifestation. It can be difficult to differentiate between immune and nonimmune mast cell-mediated reactions and pharmacologic effects from the variety of medications administered during general anesthesia. In addition, cutaneous manifestations of anaphylaxis are less likely to be apparent when anaphylaxis occurs in this setting. The evaluation of IgE-mediated reactions to medications used during anesthesia can include skin testing to a variety of anesthetic agents. Specifically, thiopental allergy has been documented by skin tests. Neuromuscular blocking agents such as succinylcholine can cause nonimmunologic histamine release, but there have also been reports of IgE-mediated reactions in some patients. Reactions to opioid analgesics are usually caused by direct mast cell mediator release rather than IgE-dependent mechanisms. Antibiotics that are administered perioperatively can cause immunologic or nonimmunologic reactions. Protamine can cause severe systemic reactions through IgE-mediated or nonimmunologic mechanisms. Blood transfusions can elicit a variety of systemic reactions, some of which might be IgE-mediated or mediated through other immunologic mechanisms. The management of anaphylactic reactions that occur during general anesthesia is similar to the management of anaphylaxis in other situations.

The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update

These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "The Diagnosis and Management of Anaphylaxis Practice Parameter: 2010 Update." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, or the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.

Prevalance of latex sensitization and associated risk factors in Turkish children with spina bifida

PURPOSE

Among children with spina bifida there is a high prevalence of latex allergy in reports from Europe and USA. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of latex sensitization and associated risk factors in children with spina bifida in Middle-Eastern region (Istanbul, Turkey).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty consecutive children affected with spina bifida were included in the study. Data were collected about age, sex, family and personal history of atopy, and the number and type of operations classified as neurosurgical, urological, and orthopedic. All patients underwent skin prick test using latex solutions and cross-reacting foods. Total and latex-specific IgE levels were also measured.

RESULTS

Latex sensitization was shown in 16% (13/80) of the patients with specific IgE > 0.7 kU/L. The number of operation, using intermittent bladder catheterization and ventricular-peritoneal shunt were significantly associated with latex sensitization.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of latex sensitization in this study was lower than reported in the literature. Environmental factors such as the type and number of operations and geographical location may play a role in the development of latex sensitization.

Risk factors for latex sensitization in young children with myelomeningocele. Clinical article

OBJECT

Patients with myelomeningoceles (MMCs) are at increased risk of latex allergy and sensitization. Number of surgeries and history of atopy are known risk factors. The object of this study was to evaluate the role of diagnostic procedures and nonsurgical treatments in latex sensitization in young patients with MMC.

METHODS

Seventy-three children with MMC were included in the study. For each child a questionnaire was administered and serum determination of IgE was performed, and 62 children underwent skin prick tests (SPTs), 60 of which had reliable results. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed, using latex sensitization as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 73 patients was 3.8 years. The SPT results were positive in 30.6%, whereas results of testing for latex-specific IgE were positive in only 8.2%. In univariate analysis, history of untethering, barium enema, and number of clean intermittent catheterizations (CICs) per day were significantly associated with positive results on the SPT. Although the number of surgical procedures was significantly higher in patients who had shunts, no significant relationship between the presence of a shunt and latex sensitization was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The young age of the patients in this study may account for the low prevalence of latex sensitization that was found. In young patients with MMC, the numbers of CICs per day, a history of untethering, circumcision, and a barium enema performed without latex-free equipment could be risk factors for latex sensitization. The use of latex-free gloves in all procedures performed in these cases, nonlatex polyvinyl chloride catheters in CIC, and ordinary nonballoon tips in barium enemas could decrease the risk of sensitization.

Peri-anesthetic Anaphylaxis

General anesthesia and anaphylaxis cause profound physiologic changes. When both occur simultaneously, it is often difficult to recognize and identify the medication or product responsible for the latter. Following such an event, the proper assessment, diagnosis, and recommendations are essential to prevent future reactions. This article reviews the more common causes of anaphylaxis during anesthesia.

Anaphylactic reactions during cesarean section

Sensitization to latex seems to occur more frequently in women than in men. Obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures have recently been shown to be a common setting for latex anaphylaxis. We analyzed all the cases of anaphylactic reactions during 1240 cesarean sections in 2004; the patients were questioned for risk factors and underwent allergy testing for drugs and latex. Four patients had anaphylaxis under spinal anesthesia and in all cases it was due to latex allergy. Reported symptoms included facial edema, profuse sweating, itching, generalized erythematous rash and hypotension. Only one patient manifested a severe reaction which included bronchospasm, dyspnea, tachypnea and anaphylactic shock, requiring orotracheal intubation and epinephrine. Our data showed a high incidence (1:310) of intraoperative latex anaphylactic reactions in the one-year study period. This may be related to the very specific population (all women) in a very specific setting (obstetrics). To prevent anaphylactic reactions during obstetric surgery it is important to identify potential risk factors to include, for example atopy, adverse reactions to foods and latex items. If latex allergy is confirmed or strongly suspected, patients should be managed in a latex-safe environment. Premedication with antihistamines and steroids might be useful to further reduce the risk. After the delivery, specific desensitization may represent a good therapeutic option.

Early exposure to latex products mediates latex sensitization in spina bifida but not in other diseases with comparable latex exposure rates

BACKGROUND

The high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with spina bifida (SB) has been attributed to repeated and early exposure to latex products. Other diseases such as gastroschisis/omphalocoele and post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus are also associated with repeated and early latex exposure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with SB is rather related to the underlying disease itself than to disease-associated known risk factors.

METHODS

We compared children with SB (n=35), children with gastroschisis/omphalocoele (G/O, n=20) and children with post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus (PH, n=45). All children with SB and PH had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt since a very young age. Patients who underwent three or less surgical procedures matched in terms of age, number of operations, atopy and gender distribution, and were analysed for IgE sensitization rates to latex.

RESULTS

In the SB group, 16 of 35 patients (46%) showed elevated latex-specific IgE antibodies in contrast to one of 20 patients (5%) in the G/O group and four of 45 patients (8.9%) in the PH group (P<0.0005 and P<0.005, Fisher's exact test). Comparing matched control groups (<or=3 operations), the effects remained significant (P<0.05 and P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the SB population bears a disease-associated propensity for latex sensitization. This effect cannot be explained exclusively by a higher number of operations and differences related to atopy, age or gender.

Latex-induced anaphylactic reaction in a child with spina bifida

Allergy to natural rubber latex presents a unique challenge in the emergency department. Latex allergy in children is most commonly identified in patients who have undergone multiple operations for neural tube defects or genitourinary anomalies. We report a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction to latex in a patient with spina bifida even with latex-free precautions.

Latex sensitisation and allergy in children with myelomeningocele

INTRODUCTION

Children with spina bifida (SB) have a high degree of exposure to latex products as a consequence of repeated surgical procedures, implantation of latex-containing materials and catheterisation. The consequence is a higher incidence of latex allergic reactions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitisation and allergy in a population of children with myelomeningocele (MMC) and to assess the role of associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent of the patients (29 out of 60) showed a latex sensitisation with specific IgE >0.7 kU/l while 15% (9 out of 60) were allergic to latex (specific IgE >0.7 kU/l and clinical manifestations). The principal factor correlated with allergy to latex was specific serum IgE to latex (radioallergosorbent test [RAST]) values (p<0.01). Other factors were total serum IgE (paper radioimmunosorbent test [PRIST]) values, number of surgical procedures and familiarity with allergy.

CONCLUSION

These results underline the importance of prophylactic measures to avoid the exposure, not only in the sanitary environment, through the institution of latex-safe routes, but also in daily life, to prevent potentially serious allergic reactions.

Latex allergy in infants younger than 1 year

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of latex allergy in children is increasing worldwide. Previous multiple operations or atopic predisposition are known risk factors. In contrast, only sporadic cases of latex allergy have been reported in infants younger than 1 year, and the causative latex-containing products or symptoms in young infants have not been studied in detail.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to analyse the symptoms and risk factors of latex allergy in young infants.

METHODS

Cases of latex allergy in infants younger than 1 year were studied in detail. Clinical course, causative latex-containing products were spotted and detailed analysis for latex allergy in patients and patients' parents was performed.

CONCLUSION

We report nine cases of latex allergy in infants younger than 1 year. None of them have any abnormality or previous operations. Six patients had atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome, one patient had bronchial asthma, whereas two patients had no overt allergic diseases. Symptoms of latex allergy were wheezing, swelling of face or lips, facial rash, or anaphylaxis, and causative latex-containing products were teat, pacifier, nose cleaner, teether, balloon, or enema tube. All of the nine patients had positive skin prick test to latex and extract from causative latex-containing products, whereas eight patients had positive serum latex-specific IgE. Study for family history revealed that latex allergy was noted in either father or mother in six patients, in both father and mother in one patient, whereas no latex allergy was noted in parents in two patients. It should be noted that all of these patients had latex-induced symptoms at home. Latex allergy in young infants may not be unusual. Physicians should be aware of latex allergy, and care should be taken to avoid contact with latex in young infants, especially when there is family history for latex allergy.

Influence of the type of operations on the development of latex sensitization in children with myelomeningocele

BACKGROUND

A genetic tendency to develop latex IgE responses in children with spina bifida has been suggested, but their degree of exposure to latex as well as the route and chronology for sensitization can be different from those of other children with multiple surgeries. The aim was to study the influence of the type of operation on the development of latex sensitization in children with myelomeningocele.

METHODS

In 90 children with myelomeningocele operated with latex, data were collected about age, sex, family, and personal history of allergy, serum total IgE, presence of a ventricular-peritoneal (v-p) shunt, and number and duration of operations, classified as urological, orthopedic, on the v-p shunt, other neurosurgical, and others. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, using the presence of latex sensitization as dependent variable.

RESULTS

Serum total IgE, the number of urological and of orthopedic operations were synergistic variables to predict latex sensitization, together with the presence of a v-p shunt, but not the number of operations performed on this device. This seems to play an adjuvant role in the process of sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only the number, but also the type of operations, namely, of urological and orthopedic nature, is important in the development of latex sensitization in children with myelomeningocele.

Increased prevalence of latex-sensitization among children with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Type-I-allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) has been shown to be more prevalent among certain groups of patients. Children suffering from chronic renal failure (CRF) could be a suspected risk group because of their intense exposure to latex through catheters, gloves and anesthetic equipment during frequent hospitalizations from early life on. We investigated the prevalence of latex-sensitization among this group of patients and sought to identify risk factors.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients (mean age 10.5 years) suffering from CRF were assessed by questionnaire-based history (details on renal disease, number and kind of surgical procedures, family and personal history of atopic diseases, allergic reactions to NRL, and the use of pacifiers) and by measurement of total and latex-specific serum immunoglobulin (Ig)E.

RESULTS

Ten of 93 (10.8%) patients showed elevated latex-specific IgE-levels. One of 10 patients reported clinical symptoms to latex-allergen, but no allergic reactions to NRL during medical care were reported. Sensitized patients were significantly more likely to be atopic, reflected by a positive history of other allergies as well as elevated total serum IgE-levels, and had a significantly higher number of urogenital surgeries (P = 0.02 in all cases, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon test, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that children with CRF are at increased risk of latex-hypersensitivity. Significant associations with atopy and repeated surgeries were observed. Larger studies are required to elucidate whether these children are also at increased risk of anaphylaxis and therefore deserve preventive measures.

Latex allergy in children with urological malformation and chronic renal failure

PURPOSE

Children with spina bifida, bladder exstrophy and anorectal anomalies are at risk for latex allergy. Severe intraoperative anaphylaxis in a boy treated with kidney transplantation prompted this study to evaluate the prevalence of latex allergy in a cohort of children with chronic renal failure (CRF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2002, 57 boys and 28 girls were investigated at a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.3 to 22.9). Urological malformations were the underlying cause of CRF in 33 patients (39%). Of the patients 39 were on conservative treatment, 20 were on dialysis and 26 had a functioning renal graft. Latex reaction was assessed by a careful history, specific serum latex IgE and skin prick test.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients (22%) showed latex reaction, of whom 8 had allergy (clinical symptoms included severe intraoperative anaphylaxis in 1) and 11 had sensitivity (positive IgE or prick test without symptoms). Of these 19 patients 11 had urological malformations. The number of surgical procedures, young age at operation and atopy were significant risk factors. When operations were analyzed separately, ie urological vs nonurological surgery, only urological surgery was significantly associated with latex reaction. A significant correlation was also found between the overall number of operations and latex radioallergosorbent class.

CONCLUSIONS

All children with CRF who undergo early and multiple urological surgery are at high risk for latex reaction. Primary latex prevention, ie the routine use of latex-free gloves, tubes and catheters, should be implemented in all children with complex urological malformations.

Latex allergy in children with oesophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

Latex allergy is frequently found in children and patients with spina bifida and urogenital abnormalities and have been considered at risk for latex sensitization. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of latex sensitization in patients with oesophageal atresia and undergoing three or more surgical procedures and to identify possible risk factors in the process of latex sensitization.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients were analysed: 19 boys and one girl. The oesophageal atresias were as follows: type I in three children, type II in two and type III in 15 children. Surgical and anaesthetic procedures, intensive care management, age, type of oesophageal atresia, associated congenital malformations, Waterston and Montreal prognostic classifications were considered as risk factors that may be implicated in the process of sensitization.

RESULTS

Five patients (25%) were considered sensitized to latex (group 1) and 15 (75%) nonsensitized (group 2). Among the five sensitized patients, three reported clinical reactions to latex, while the other two presented only specific IgE sensitization. The number of operations, the total hours of surgery, the number of drainages, the total days of drainage, the total days of central venous catheter were significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2. Both of the highest risk oesophageal atresia classes (Waterston C and Montreal II) were related to latex allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal atresia, especially in cases of prolonged management, must be considered as a risk for the development of latex allergy.

Transdermal Xenobiotics in Newborn Skin

Newborn infants are regularly exposed to a wide variety of topical agents, including treatments for rashes, antimicrobial agents, solvents, and skin barriers or moisturizers. Premature and hospitalized infants are also exposed to topical iodine for antisepsis and to topical analgesic agents. The fact that most of these agents have not been specifically evaluated for use in infants has recently been recognized as a major public health concern. The epidermis of preterm infants is not fully developed, constituting an incomplete barrier to systemic absorption of topical agents. Thus, substances applied to the skin can have adverse systemic effects. Povidone-iodine and steroid creams have been associated with thyroid and hypothalamic-pituitary axis suppression, respectively, in premature infants. Application of topical EMLA (Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics) for analgesia has been implicated in methemoglobinemia in premature infants. Exposure to natural latex in gloves and medical equipment may sensitize infants, leading to the development of airway hyperreactivity and other allergic manifestations. Therefore, it is advisable to limit skin exposure of premature infants to xenobiotics. Further work is required to define safe doses of common agents. In addition, transdermal administration of systemic medications, including methylxanthines, may be practical in premature infants.

Anaphylactic reactions during surgical and medical procedures

The most common agents that are responsible for intraoperative anaphylaxis are muscle relaxants. However, latex accounts for a significant number of these reactions, and the incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis caused by latex is increasing. It is now probably the second most important cause of intraoperative anaphylaxis. Following muscle relaxants and latex are probably antibiotics and anesthesia induction agents. Other agents that are responsible include colloids, opioids, and radiocontrast material. However, they account for less than 10% of all reactions. The clinical manifestations of intraoperative reactions differ from those of anaphylactic reactions outside of anesthesia. Cutaneous manifestations are far less common; cardiovascular collapse may be more common. The diagnosis can be made more difficult because patients cannot express symptoms. There is a paucity of cutaneous findings; the patient is draped, and concomitantly administered drugs may alter the manifestations. These additional drugs can also complicate therapy. There are populations who are at-risk for anaphylaxis to latex during surgical procedures: individuals with a genetic predisposition (atopic individuals), individuals with increased previous exposure to latex (eg, anyone who requires chronic bladder care with repeated insertion of latex catheters or chronic indwelling catheters), health care workers who are exposed to latex mainly by inhalation, and possibly patients who have undergone multiple surgical procedures and therefore have been exposed to latex intravascularly and by catheterization on a number of occasions. It has been shown that pretreatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids that are used successfully for the prevention of reactions to radiocontrast material are not as effective in the prevention of anaphylactic reactions to latex. Therefore, the major emphasis has been on prevention. The key elements of prevention include an adequate history, testing for latex allergy in high-risk patients, preadmission measures, and the establishment of a "latex-free environment" while the individual is hospitalized. This is particularly important in the operating and recovery rooms.

[Peculiarities of latex allergy and preventive measures in the pediatric age group]

Latex allergy can be considered a problem of public health in at-risk populations. Although the figures on prevalence vary, approximately 1 % of the general population is sensitized to latex. To date, two determining factors for latex sensitization have been identified: an atopic predisposition and the number of operations. Among atopic patients or those at-risk for allergy, the prevalence of latex sensitization is between 3 and 20 times higher than that among the general population. Nevertheless, the effect of this factor seems to be modulatory and the determining factor seems to be the number of operations that children have undergone; the critical number is 5-6 interventions, after which the probability of sensitization increases considerably.All children who have undergone multiple operations should be considered as being at-risk. Children with spina bifida are especially at-risk. The reasons for this are still a matter of debate: the disease itself has been postulated as a specific risk factor, although other, possible associated factors could be determinant in triggering latex sensitization (the presence of a ventricular-peritoneal shunt, age at which surgery was performed, type of operation, etc.). Children with spina bifida and latex allergy show considerable differences in type of allergic sensitization; these differences seem to result from the different route of sensitization and could explain the variations observed in the clinical manifestations between children and adults: children become sensitized mainly by direct contact between latex particles and blood vessels and open mucosae while in adults the process takes place transcutaneously or by inhalation of aerosol particles. Consequently, the most frequent manifestation in children is urticaria while contact dermatitis and respiratory symptoms predominate in adults. Studies performed with immunoblotting have confirmed that children have IgE that almost constantly recognize low molecular weight latex proteins (14, 15 and 27 Kd) while this finding is less frequent in adults.The preventive measures in the pediatric population focus on avoidance of latex, especially in hospitals. Today, latex is ubiquitous, making complete avoidance difficult. When necessary, and whenever a latex-free environment cannot be guaranteed, presurgical medication can be used, although its utility is debatable. Although further studies are required, specific immunotherapy is one therapeutic possibility that may in future be used in children with latex allergy.

Impact of repeated surgical procedures on the incidence and prevalence of latex allergy: a prospective study of 1263 children

Assessment with questionnaire, skin tests, and immunoglobulin E measurements showed 6 (0.5%) of 1263 children having elective surgery had latex allergy; 50 (4%) others were latex-sensitized. Any previous operation increased the odds of latex sensitization by 13 times; multiple operations had a less marked effect. All children having surgery may need primary prophylaxis for latex.

Latex allergy in children on home mechanical ventilation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Determining the incidence of latex allergy in children receiving home mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of latex allergy in the general population ranges from 0.1 to 1.0%. However, in patients with spina bifida and other chronic medical conditions associated with repeated exposure to latex, the prevalence may be as high as 60%. Children receiving home mechanical ventilation are frequently exposed to latex products. Therefore, we hypothesized that these children would be at increased risk for latex allergy.

DESIGN

Fifty-seven children receiving home mechanical ventilation (31 boys, 26 girls; mean [+/- SD] age, 7.8+/-6.6 years; range, 0.3 to 23.2 years) were enrolled. A radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for latex was administered and serum IgE levels were obtained in all patients.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (29.8%) were found to have a positive RAST for latex. Patients with latex allergy had required mechanical ventilation for an average of 6.1+/-4.1 years vs. 5.5+/-5.4 years (p = 0.69; not significant) in those without latex allergy. Eleven of 17 patients (64.7%) had elevated serum IgE levels in the group with latex allergy vs only 14 of 40 patients (35.0%) in the group with a negative latex RAST (p = 0.04; odds ratio, 3.4).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there is a high incidence of latex allergy in children requiring home mechanical ventilation. We speculate that screening all children receiving home mechanical ventilation may lead to the identification of patients with previously undiagnosed latex allergy and the prevention of untoward reactions from exposure to latex.