The heritability of polymorphic light eruption

Systematic review of the prevalence and incidence of the photodermatoses with meta-analysis of the prevalence of polymorphic light eruption

Information about the prevalence of photodermatoses is lacking, despite their substantial impact on life quality. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to establish what is known regarding prevalence and incidence of photodermatoses. We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase from inception to 2021 to identify original population-based studies in English literature reporting the prevalence and/or incidence of photodermatoses. Information was extracted according to geographical location and risk of bias was assessed using a 10-point risk of bias tool for prevalence studies. Primary outcome was the population prevalence of photodermatoses. Prevalence data for polymorphic light eruption (PLE) were used to calculate the global pooled prevalence of PLE. Twenty-six studies were included; 15 reported prevalence of photodermatoses based on samples of the general population and 11 on prevalence and/or incidence from national and international registry data. The general population studies involved PLE (nine studies), unspecified photosensitivity (2), actinic prurigo (2), juvenile spring eruption (1), chronic actinic dermatitis (1) and variegate porphyria (1), while registry studies reported on cutaneous porphyrias and genophotodermatoses (nine and two studies, respectively). Worldwide the prevalence of PLE between countries ranged from 0.65% (China) to 21.4% (Ireland). The pooled estimated prevalence of PLE was 10% (95% CI 6%-15%) among the general population (n = 19,287), and PLE prevalence increased with distance from the equator (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). While several photodermatoses are rare, photosensitivity can be prevalent at wide-ranging world locations, including Egypt where photosensitivity was found in 4% of children and 10% of adults. This study showed that PLE is highly prevalent in many populations and that its prevalence shows a highly significant correlation with increasing northerly or southerly latitude. Available population-based studies for photodermatoses suggest they can be prevalent at a range of world locations; more attention is required to this area.

NRF2 in dermatological disorders: Pharmacological activation for protection against cutaneous photodamage and photodermatosis

The skin barrier and its endogenous protective mechanisms cope daily with exogenous stressors, of which ultraviolet radiation (UVR) poses an imminent danger. Although the skin is able to reduce the potential damage, there is a need for comprehensive strategies for protection. This is particularly important when developing pharmacological approaches to protect against photocarcinogenesis. Activation of NRF2 has the potential to provide comprehensive and long-lasting protection due to the upregulation of numerous cytoprotective downstream effector proteins that can counteract the damaging effects of UVR. This is also applicable to photodermatosis conditions that exacerbate the damage caused by UVR. This review describes the alterations caused by UVR in normal skin and photosensitive disorders, and provides evidence to support the development of NRF2 activators as pharmacological treatments. Key natural and synthetic activators with photoprotective properties are summarized. Lastly, the gap in knowledge in research associated with photodermatosis conditions is highlighted.

Association of polymorphous light eruption with NOD-2 and TLR-5 gene polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Polymorphous light eruption (PLE) is a common, immunologically mediated, photosensitive skin disease. After ultraviolet-B (UV-B) irradiation, patients with PLE show reduced Langerhans cell (LC) depletion in the epidermis, which results in a non-suppressive microenvironment in the skin. Interestingly, severe acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGvHD) occurred in stem cell transplanted patients that showed no or incomplete depletion of LCs after UVB-irradiation. Genetic variation in nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD-2) and toll-like receptor 5 (TLR-5) genes also confers susceptibility to aGvHD.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that PLE is associated with genetic variation in the NOD-2 and TLR-5 genes.

METHODS

We investigated single nucleotid polymorphisms (SNPs) of NOD-2 (R702W, G908R, 3020Cins) and TLR-5 (A592S, P616L, N392STOP) in skin biopsies of PLE-patients (n=143) and in healthy controls (n=104) using restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis.

RESULTS

The frequency of NOD-2 alleles with the SNP R702W was significantly higher in PLE than in controls (31.8% vs 6.3%; p<0.0001), and homozygous carriers of this mutation were more common in PLE (27.9% vs 0%; p<0.0001). For SNP 3020Cins, the allele frequency (7.3% vs 0.7%; p=0.0025) and the number of heterozygotes (14.7% vs 1.3%; p=0.0019) were higher in PLE. The frequency of alleles with the N392STOP SNP of the TLR5 gene, which is associated with a truncated, non-functional receptor, was significantly higher in PLE (21% vs 5%; 7% vs 1% homozygotes, 28% vs 8% heterozygotes; p<0.0001). The other SNPs did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

This study yielded a high frequency of functional SNPs in the NOD-2 and TLR-5 genes in PLE. The same SNPs are associated with aGvHD and there are similarities in the reaction of LCs after UVB-irradiation between aGvHD and PLE. This leads to the hypothesis that PLE-patients may be more susceptible to developing GvHD after stem-cell transplantation, an assumption that needs to be investigated further.

Immunopathogenesis and management of polymorphic light eruption

Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is the most common immunologically mediated photodermatosis, demonstrating many abnormalities caused by critical failure of ultraviolet (UV)-induced immunosuppression. The unique expression of antimicrobial peptides in PLE, which is most likely determined by alteration of microbiome components upon UV exposure, implicates their possible triggering role and pathogenic significance in the eruption. The review aims to clarify current knowledge regarding the immunological disturbances correlated with PLE that serve a base for better understanding of molecular pathogenesis of the disease and the development of new therapeutic strategies. Preventive treatment with broad-spectrum suncreens and sunscreens containing DNA repair enzymes, as well as natural photohardening with graduate exposure to sunlight in early spring could be sufficient in milder cases. Antioxidants and topical calcipotriol are promising approach for adjuvant prevention. Phototherapy, mainly with narrow band UVB rays, is more appropriate method in severe cases of the disease. The established treatment options for PLE include local and systemic glucocorticoids, systemic nonsedative antihistamines for itch relief, and rarely, immunosuppressive drugs in the refractory cases. Like medical photohardening, afamelanotide has the potential of photoprotection by inducing a melanization of the skin. Afamelanotide is believed to be a possible new treatment option for very severe and refractory cases of PLE. Targeting the main pruritogenic cytokine, IL-31, opens a new road for the development of novel therapeutic approaches to combat moderate and severe itching in cases of PLE with intense pruritus.

Effects of tobacco and vaping on the skin

Cigarette and electronic cigarette use are significant public health concerns across the United States. Tobacco use remains the single most preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Electronic cigarettes initially emerged as a better alternative to conventional cigarettes and for promoting smoking cessation; however, current evidence reveals similar deleterious health implications caused by both products on almost all organ systems, including the skin. Recognition of the cutaneous manifestations associated with cigarette and electronic cigarette use is essential for dermatologists in current clinical practice. Dermatologists play a vital role in educating and counseling patients on smoking cessation. We specifically highlight the cutaneous consequences of conventional cigarette smoking and electronic cigarettes on dermatologic disease.

Polymorphous Light Eruption- An Indian Scenario

Polymorphous light eruption (PMLE) is the most common, idiopathic, acquired photodermatosis, characterized by abnormal, recurrent, and delayed reaction to sunlight. Polymorphous light eruption is common worldwide but the morphology, distribution, and pigmentary changes are unique in Indian skin which is discussed in this review. The prevalence of PMLE is around 10–20% in the general population. It commonly occurs in females between 20and 30 years of age. It is the most common photodermatosis in school-going children. Visible light sensitivity is an important phenomenon in PMLE. It typically presents as recurrent and chronic lesions over photoexposed sites. Initially, patchy erythema occurs with pruritus. Most of the Indians belong to type IV to type VI skin and pigmentary changes are commonly seen. The unique feature of PMLE in Indian skin is the pigmentary change which varies from hypopigmented to hyperpigmented lesions. These pigmentary changes may occur alone or in combination with erythematous or skin-colored lesions. The pigmentary lesions are seen in more than 50% of lesions. The histopathology of PMLE is characterized by the presence of hyperkeratosis, spongiosis with or without the presence of liquefactive degeneration in the epidermis. Dermal changes in the upper and mid dermis include the presence of dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. The management of PMLE includes both preventive measures and medical management. Topical sunscreens, topical steroids, hydroxychloroquine and antioxidants play a very important role.

Recent Developments in the Diagnosis and Management of Photosensitive Disorders

Photodermatoses occur in males and females of all races and ages. Onset can be variable in timing and influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Photodermatoses are broadly classified as immunologically mediated, chemical- and drug-induced, photoaggravated, and genetic (defective DNA repair or chromosomal instability) diseases. Advances in the field have led to improved recognition and treatment of many photodermatoses. The purpose of this focused review is to provide an update on the diagnosis and management of a variety of photodermatoses, both common and less common, with review of recent updates in the literature pertaining to their diagnosis and management.

Polymorphic Light Eruption: What's New in Pathogenesis and Management

Polymorphic light eruption is the commonest photosensitive disorder, characterized by an intermittent eruption of non-scarring erythematous papules, vesicles or plaques that develop within hours of ultraviolet radiation exposure of patient skin. Together with the lesions, a terrible itch starts and increases with the spreading of the disease, sometimes aggravated by a sort of burning sensation. Clinical picture and symptoms can improve during the rest of the summer with further solar exposures. In the last years many advances have been performed in the knowledge of its pathogenesis and some news have been proposed as preventive, as well as therapeutic options. All this has been discussed in the current mini review.

Insight into immunocytes infiltrations in polymorphous light eruption

Polymorphous light eruption (PLE) which is one of the most common photodermatoses has been demonstrated to be immune-mediated disorder. Resistance to UV-induced immunosuppression resulting from differential immune cells infiltration and cytokines secretion has been highlighted in the pathogenesis of PLE. In this study, we reviewed differential patterns of immune cells infiltrations and cytokines secretion that may contribute to PLE occurrence and development.

Polymorphous Light Eruption

Polymorphous light eruption (PLE) is the commonest immuno-mediated photodermatosis. It occurs after solar or artificial UV-light exposure and affects only the sun-exposed areas with preference of the V-area of the chest, of arms and forearms, legs, upper part of the back, and rarely the face. The lesions are itching or burning, and vary morphologically from erythema to papules, vesico-papules and occasionally blisters, plaques, sometimes erythema multiforme-like, insect bite-like wheals and purpura. The clinical manifestations befall within a few hours to days from light exposure, last a few days, and subside in about a week without sequelae. Its diagnosis is based on history, morphology and phototests. PLE is considered as a delayed hypersensitivity response to newly UV induced, but still unidentified, antigen(s). Usually, MED is normal, but the provocative phototests with UVA or UVB reproduce the spontaneous lesions in about 50% of the patients. Broad spectrum sunscreens and antioxidants, photohardening with PUVA or narrow band UVB may be beneficial to prevent the disease. Therapy is based mainly on topical or systemic corticosteroids.

Influence of the season on vitamin D levels and regulatory T cells in patients with polymorphic light eruption

The exact mechanisms of photohardening in polymorphic light eruption (PLE) are still unknown, but medical photohardening was shown to increase regulatory T cell (Treg) numbers in the blood of PLE patients, similar to natural hardening. Furthermore, oral vitamin D supplementation increased peripheral Tregs in healthy individuals. We herein report on a post hoc analysis of 26 screened PLE patients of a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01595893), in which the influence of the progressing season was investigated on baseline CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127- Treg numbers by flow cytometry and Treg suppressive function by co-culture assays with T effector cells as a secondary endpoint, together with 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) serum levels at the study's screening visit, taking place in the period from January to June. The mean 25(OH)D serum level of all patients was 33.2 ng ml(-1). Ten of those patients (38.5%) were identified with low 25(OH)D levels (<30 ng ml(-1)). Significantly higher baseline 25(OH)D serum levels (plus 34.4%; P = 0.0182) as well as higher relative Treg percentages in CD4+ population (plus 62.8%; P = 0.0157) and in total lymphocyte population (plus 59.6%; P = 0.0372) and higher absolute Treg numbers (plus 100.2%; P = 0.0042) were observed in the late spring/early summer period (April to June) compared to the winter period (January to February). No significant relationship was observed when Treg numbers and function were correlated with 25(OH)D levels. These data indicate that in PLE patients Treg numbers and their suppressive function are independent of vitamin D serum levels and suggest that UV light and/or other seasonal factors may affect these cells via the non-vitamin D related pathway(s).

Levels and function of regulatory T cells in patients with polymorphic light eruption: relation to photohardening

Background

We hypothesized that regulatory T cells (Tregs) are involved in the immunological abnormalities seen in patients with polymorphic light eruption (PLE).

Objectives

To investigate the number and suppressive function of peripheral Tregs in patients with PLE compared with healthy controls.

Methods

Blood sampling was done in 30 patients with PLE [seeking or not seeking 311‐nm ultraviolet (UV)B photohardening] as well as 19 healthy controls at two time points: TP1, March to June (before phototherapy); and TP2, May to August (after phototherapy). We compared the number of CD4⁺CD25^highCD127⁻FoxP3⁺ Tregs by flow cytometry and their function by assessing FoxP3 mRNA levels and effector T cell/Treg suppression assays.

Results

Tregs isolated from healthy controls significantly suppressed the proliferation of effector T cells at TP1 by 68% (P = 0·0156). In contrast, Tregs from patients with PLE entirely lacked the capacity to suppress effector T‐cell proliferation at that time point. The medical photohardening seen in 23 patients with PLE resulted in a significant increase in the median percentage of circulating Tregs [both as a proportion of all lymphocytes; 65 6% increase (P = 0·0049), and as a proportion of CD4⁺ T cells; 32.5% increase (P = 0·0049)]. This was accompanied by an increase in the expression of FoxP3 mRNA (P = 0·0083) and relative immunosuppressive function of Tregs (P = 0·083) comparing the two time points in representative subsets of patients with healthy controls tested. Seven patients with PLE not receiving 311‐nm UVB also exhibited an increase in the number of Tregs but this was not statistically significant. No significant differences in Treg numbers were observed in healthy subjects between the two time points.

Conclusions

An impaired Treg function is likely to play a role in PLE pathogenesis. A UV‐induced increase in the number of Tregs (either naturally or therapeutically) may be a compensatory mechanism by which the immune system counteracts the susceptibility to PLE.

What's already known about this topic?

Patients with polymorphic light eruption (PLE) display immunological abnormalities.

Previous studies have shown that they are resistant to the immune suppressive effects of sunlight.

What does this study add?

We found that the number and suppressive function of regulatory T cells (Tregs) are crucial in the pathogenesis of PLE.

An increase in Treg levels (after photohardening) might be a compensatory mechanism by which the immune system intends to counteract the susceptibility to PLE formation.

Polymorphous light eruption: clinic aspects and pathogenesis

Polymorphous light eruption is an immunologically mediated photodermatosis with high prevalence, particularly among young women in temperate climates, characterized by pruritic skin lesions of variable morphology, occurring in spring or early summer on sun-exposed body sites. A resistance to ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced immunosuppression and a subsequent delayed-type hypersensitivity response to a photoantigen have been suggested as key factors in the disease. Molecular and immunologic disturbances associated with disease pathogenesis include a failure of skin infiltration by neutrophils and other regulatory immune cells on UVR exposure linked to a disturbed cytokine microenvironment. Standard management is based on prevention.

GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphism in polymorphous light eruption

BACKGROUND

Polymorphous light eruption (PLE) is the most common chronic and idiopathic photodermatosis. PLE is assumed to represent an immunological hypersensitivity reaction to a radiation-induced cutaneous antigen involving reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the basis of a genetic predisposition. Among others, cellular protection against ROS is provided by glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). Different variants of the GST enzymes may influence the activity and efficiency of detoxification and biotransformation of unknown UV-induced skin-antigens and other factors that may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PLE.

METHODS

In this study the relationship between isoenzymes of the GST genes GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 and possible protective or predisposing effects on PLE was examined in 29 patients and 144 controls. Diagnosis of PLE was based on the presence of characteristic clinical features.

RESULTS

No association between the functional polymorphisms of the GST gene family and PLE was found. Prevalence of certain GST isoenzymes or polymorphisms in patients with PLE did not differ from healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support prevalence of GST isoenzymes or polymorphisms as a protective effect against PLE. Especially a higher carrier frequency of GSTP1 Val(105) as a protective factor against PLE which has been published before could not be proved. The GST genotypes GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 (including SNPs) seem to have no relevant association with PLE.

A review of UVA-mediated photosensitivity disorders

A number of skin conditions are characterised by photosensitivity to UVA. Some of these are exclusively UVA-mediated conditions, while others include UVA in the action spectrum which also include UVB and/or visible light. This review aims to describe this diverse range of conditions for non-dermatologist scientists with an interest in this topic. As such, clinical details, including treatments, are brief and succinct. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of these conditions is highlighted.

Genetic influences on peripheral arterial disease in a twin population

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the development of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in a large population-based sample of twins.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The understanding of genetics in PAD is still limited. From the Swedish Twin Registry and the national patient discharge registry, 1464 twins with PAD were identified, including 33 monozygotic (MZ) and 42 dizygotic (DZ) concordant pairs and 298 MZ and 1008 DZ discordant pairs. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were significantly more prevalent in twins with PAD than in those without PAD. Concordances and correlations were higher in MZ compared with DZ twins, indicating genetic influences in PAD. The risk of PAD for persons whose twin had PAD compared with persons whose twin did not have PAD, estimated as an odds ratio, was 17.7 (95% CI, 11.7 to 26.6) for MZ twins and 5.7 (95% CI, 4.1 to 7.9) for DZ twins. In the structural equation models, Mx analyses, genetic effects accounted for 58% (95% CI, 50% to 64%) and nonshared environmental effects for 42% (95% CI, 36% to 50%) of the phenotypic variance among twins.

CONCLUSIONS

Heritability is an important component, along with unique environmental factors, for the development of PAD. The proportion of the overall PAD heritability attributed to the heritability of cardiovascular risk factors needs to be resolved. Traditional risk factors could explain a major proportion of PAD heritability. A better understanding of the genetics in PAD could identify individuals at increased risk who may benefit from targeted therapies.

Registry research in dermatology

A medical "registry" is a systematic collection of information from cases of a particular disease or other health relevant condition. Hospital-based registries primarily address prognosis, whereas population-based registries provide estimates of disease incidence. Opportunities to establish and investigate dermatology hospital- and population-based registries abound.

Polymorphous light eruption

Polymorphous light eruption is the most common photodermatosis, with a prevalence of as high as 10-20% in Western Europe and in the USA. It starts during the second and third decades of life. Although not life-threatening it can severely impair the quality of life, in particular during leisure activities and in outdoors workers. Polymorphous light eruption belongs to the group of so-called idiopathic photodermatoses. This term denotes dermatoses that occur in otherwise healthy individuals from exposure to sunlight or artificial light without the intervention of an exogenous photosensitizing agent. These diseases have two factors in common: they are precipitated by ultraviolet or visible radiation; and their exact pathomechanism remains obscure but is presumably immunologic in nature.

A protective effect of glutathione-S-transferase GSTP1*Val(105) against polymorphic light eruption

Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a common skin disease, susceptibility to which is genetically determined. The prevalence of PLE is significantly increased in patients with lupus erythematosus (LE) including subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), which may reflect a common genetic background. Experimental evidence supports a role for reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the pathogenesis of PLE, and the family of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzymes exerts a critical physiological role in cellular protection against this oxidative damage. Our aim was to look for association between the functional GST gene polymorphisms and PLE, SCLE, and DLE in a case-control study. The carrier frequency of GSTP1 Val(105) in subjects with PLE was 40%, significantly lower than the carrier frequency in controls (54%, P=0.019), although significance was lost on correction for multiple testing. However, the carrier frequency of the GSTP1 Val(105) allele in combined cutaneous LE (SCLE and DLE) patients with PLE was 42%, significantly lower than in those without PLE (72%), which did survive correction (corrected P=0.043). We have identified evidence supporting a protective GSTP1 allele, the first genetic association to be reported for PLE. This supports a role for ROS in the pathogenesis of PLE and may provide a therapeutic target for future treatment of this common, often disabling, condition.

Polymorphic light eruption may be associated with cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption

BACKGROUND

Although the genetic influence on polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is well established, the role of lifestyle factors is less well defined.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted that included 74 PLE patients and 102 controls. Each participant was interviewed about demographic, disease and lifestyle characteristics such as smoking, alcohol consumption and use of medications. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Compared with the controls, patients with PLE were significantly more likely to be younger females (P<0.05). Univariate analysis did not show a significant association between any of the smoking-related questions and PLE. However, after adjusting for gender and drinking alcohol, patients with PLE were significantly more likely to smoke 15 cigarettes or more daily [adjusted OR=4.06 (95% CI=1.19, 13.80) compared with 0 daily cigarettes] than controls. Participants who consumed six or more drinks a week were less likely to have PLE [adjusted OR=0.24 (95% CI=0.07, 0.80)]. In contrast, women who used oral anticonceptives for a longer period were four-fold more likely to have PLE [adjusted OR=4.74 (95% CI=1.33, 16.86)].

CONCLUSION

Several lifestyle factors may be associated with PLE, but further studies are warranted to confirm these retrospective findings.

Polymorphic light eruption

Polymorphic light eruption (PMLE) is the most common photodermatosis. It is typically characterized by nonscarring, pruritic, erythematous papules, plaques, or vesicles on sun-exposed skin that develop 30 minutes to several hours after sun exposure. The eruption may persist for a few hours to as long as 2 weeks. Females are affected two to three times more often than males. PMLE has been reported in all races, but tends to affect fair-skinned individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV most commonly. The pathogenesis of PMLE has been difficult to define, although it appears to be an immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. Abnormalities of arachidonic acid metabolism and a possible correlation with lupus are other theories that are reviewed. Treatment options have been explored extensively. While "hardening" or desensitization of the skin through repeated irradiation seems to be the most effective, therapeutic options such as sun avoidance/sun protection, oral carotenoids, and antimalarials are also considered.

Treatment of polymorphic light eruption

Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a highly prevalent photosensitivity disorder, estimated to affect 11-21% people in temperate countries. Typically, PLE appears as a recurrent pruritic eruption comprising papules and/or vesicles and/or plaques, which occurs on photo-exposed skin sites following sun exposure, and which heals without scarring. Commoner in females, the aetiology is uncertain, although there is evidence of an immune basis. We perform a review of the prophylaxis and treatment of this condition. While sun protection, corticosteroids and desensitization phototherapy are the mainstays of management, a range of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents are reported.

The influence of genetics and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of acne: a twin study of acne in women

Acne is common and often leads to significant psychologic and physical morbidity. From clinical experience, acne appears to run in families; however, very few studies have investigated the genetic basis of this very common skin disease. A large twin study based on 458 pairs of monozygotic and 1099 pairs of dizygotic twins, all women with a mean age of 46 y was performed to investigate the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors on the liability to acne. In addition, potential risk factors were assessed in twins with and without acne in a nested cross-sectional design. Fourteen percent of the twins reported a history of acne. Genetic modeling using acne scores showed that 81% (95% confidence interval 73-87%) of the variance of the disease was attributable to additive genetic effects. The remaining 19% was attributed to unique (i.e., unshared) environmental factors. Of the potential risk factors tested in 400 acne twins and 2414 unaffected twins, only apolipoprotein A1 serum levels were significantly lower in acne twins even after adjusting for age and weight. Family history of acne was also significantly associated with an increased risk. No significant differences were found between acne twins and nonacne twins for weight, body mass index, height, birth weight, hair thinning, reproductive factors as well as cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose levels. The lower serum levels of apolipoprotein A1 in acne twins were also confirmed when analyzing acne discordant twin pairs. The evidence of a major genetic influence on acne should stimulate the search for potential genes that may lead to new therapeutic approaches.

Photosensitivity disorders: cause, effect and management

Abnormal photosensitivity syndromes form a significant and common group of skin diseases. They include primary (idiopathic) photodermatoses such as polymorphic light eruption (PLE), chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD), actinic prurigo, hydroa vacciniforme and solar urticaria, in addition to drug- and chemical-induced photosensitivity and photo-exacerbated dermatoses. They can be extremely disabling and difficult to diagnose. PLE, characterized by a recurrent pruritic papulo-vesicular eruption of affected skin within hours of sun exposure, is best managed by restriction of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and the use of high sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens. If these measures are insufficient, prophylactic phototherapy with PUVA, broadband UVB or narrowband UVB (TL-01) for several weeks during spring may be necessary. CAD manifests as a dermatitis of chronically sun-exposed skin. Again, UVR exposure needs to be restricted; cyclosporine, azathioprine or PUVA may also be necessary. Actinic prurigo is characterized by the presence of excoriated papules and nodules on the face and limbs, most prominent and numerous distally. Actinic prurigo is managed again by restriction of UVR and the use of high SPF sunscreens; PUVA or broadband UVB therapy, or low doses of thalidomide may be necessary. Hydroa vacciniforme causes crops of discrete erythematous macules, 2 to 3mm in size, that evolve into blisters within a couple of days of sun exposure. Treatment for this rare disease is difficult; absorbent sunscreens and restricted UVR exposure may help. Solar urticaria is characterized by acute erythema and urticarial wealing after exposure to UVR. Treatment options for solar urticaria include non-sedating antihistamines such as fexofenadine and cetirizine; other options include absorbent sunscreens, restriction of UVR at the relevant wavelength, maintenance of a non-responsive state with natural or artificial light exposure and plasmapheresis. Industrial, cosmetic and therapeutic agents can induce exogenous drug- or chemical-induced photosensitivity. The clinical pattern is highly varied, depending on the agent; treatment is based on removal of the photosensitizer along with restriction of UVR exposure. Predominantly non-photosensitive dermatoses may also be exacerbated or precipitated by UVR; exposure to UVR should be reduced and sunscreens should be advocated, along with appropriate treatment of the underlying disease.

Polymorphous light eruption

Polymorphous light eruption (PLE) is a common idiopathic photosensitivity disorder with an estimated prevalence of 10-20%. It is characterized by an intermittent skin reaction to ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, consisting of non-scarring pruritic erythematous papules, vesicles or plaques that develop on light-exposed skin. Despite the different morphology in different individuals, the eruption tends to have a monomorphous presentation in any single subject. The histopathological features of PLE are distinct and comprise a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis, subepidermal oedema and variable epidermal changes. The pathogenesis of PLE is not well known, but findings suggest that it is a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to one or more UV-modified cutaneous antigens. The principal action of PLE is mainly in the UVA region, although some subjects exhibit sensitivity to UVB alone or to both UVA and UVB radiation at the same time. Preventive measures in PLE include the regular use of photoprotective methods combined with graduated exposures to natural sunlight. The induction of immune tolerance by phototherapy and photochemotherapy are useful prophylactic methods in moderate to severe cases. The role of systemic agents in the management of PLE is under investigation. This article reviews the epidemiological, pathogenetic and clinical aspects of PLE and discusses recent advances in the diagnostic approach and management of this condition.

Polymorphic light eruption and the HLA DRB1*0301 extended haplotype are independent risk factors for cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Recent evidence suggests that polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is an inherited photosensitivity disorder which may predispose to cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE). In this study we examine the relative risk (RR) attributable to the presence of PLE, together with the effect of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in the development of cutaneous LE. Eighty-five Caucasian patients with annular subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and discoid LE (DLE) were recruited, together with 102 first degree relatives and 200 healthy local Caucasian controls. Symptoms suggestive of PLE were elicited in patients and relatives, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing determined by PCR-SSP. Standard association analysis and family transmission disequilibrium testing (TDT) were then used to compare the HLA frequencies between groups. We found a significant (P < 0.05) association of the HL4 A*01, B*08, DRB1*0301 extended haplotype with both SCLE and DLE and also significant association of DLE with the HLA A*03, B*07, DRB1*15 haplotype, with a possible protective effect in SCLE for HLA B*44 and DRB1*04 (P=0.002 and 0.001 respectively). Association was observed between PLE and cutaneous LE (P < 0.001), but not between PLE and any HLA allele. From these figures we estimate, for the general population, that the RR of developing SCLE given the presence of (a) PLE, (b) DRB1*0301 and (c) both PLE and DRB1*0301 is 3.37, 5.45 and 12.03, respectively. For DLE, equivalent RRs are 3.11, 2.15 and 6.94. In conclusion, these data imply the involvement of both PLE and HLA DRB1*0301 in the development of SCLE and DLE. They form a basis for examining the genetic architecture of photosensitivity, some aspects of which may be common to both cutaneous LE and PLE.

Diseases associated with photosensitivity

Photosensitive disorders may be classified as those entirely caused by solar exposure and the photoaggravated disorders. Those in the former category include polymorphic light eruption, juvenile spring eruption, actinic prurigo, hydroa vacciniforme, solar urticaria, also chronic actinic dermatitis. Genodermatoses whose expression mainly depends on UV or light exposure include the DNA repair deficient disorders, some disorders of cornification, the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome and porphyria. Examples of photoaggravated diseases include lupus erythematosus, erythema multiforme, atopic eczema, psoriasis, viral exanthemata, pemphigus, dermatitis herpetiformis and rosacea. Drugs and chemicals may interact with UV to induce photosensitivity. In many of these diseases the action spectrum is known or may be determined by phototesting. Recognition of the reaction patterns associated with the photodermatoses greatly assists clinical classification of the photodermatoses.

Photodermatoses in the elderly

Several photodermatoses specifically affect the elderly, and many others continue into old age. Photodermatoses present unique challenges in diagnosis and management when considered in the context of the multiple pathologies and problems of polypharmacy in this age group. This article examines the idiopathic photodermatoses, which include chronic actinic dermatitis, specifically a disease of the middle-aged and elderly. Endogenous (metabolic) and exogenous (drug and chemical) photodermatoses, as well as photo-exacerbated dermatoses, also are discussed.

A candidate gene analysis of three related photosensitivity disorders: cutaneous lupus erythematosus, polymorphic light eruption and actinic prurigo

BACKGROUND

Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a common inherited photosensitivity disorder, which may predispose to several related but distinct conditions, including subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and actinic prurigo (AP).

OBJECTIVES

To examine specific candidate genes for shared susceptibility alleles between these related phenotypes.

METHODS

Eighty-five caucasian patients with annular SCLE or DLE were recruited, in addition to 102 first-degree relatives. The prevalence of PLE in both the patient and relative groups was determined by detailed interview and clinical examination. Eighty-five patients with pure PLE and 59 patients with AP were also recruited. Candidate genes were analysed by typing of single nucleotide polymorphisms of IL10 (-1082 G/A and -819 C/T), FCGR2A (131 R/H), SELE (128 S/R), ICAM1 (241 G/R and 469 E/K), IL1A (+ 4845 G/T), IL1B (-511 C/T and + 3954 C/T), IL1RN (+ 2018 T/C) and TNF (-308 G/A) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with sequence-specific primers and 5'-nuclease PCR.

RESULTS

A significant association was found between SCLE and the rare TNF -308 A allele when compared with patients with DLE (P = 0.043), PLE (P = 0.001), AP (P < 0.001) and healthy controls (P < 0.001). However, there was strong linkage disequilibrium between TNF -308 A and the HLA A*01, B*08, DRB1*0301 haplotype. A negative association was also found between SCLE and the IL1B + 3954 T allele (P = 0.039), but the significance was lost on correction for multiple testing.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the association of SCLE with the rare TNF -308 A allele, which may be pathogenic or, alternatively, a marker allele for the extended HLA A*01, B*08, DRB1*0301 haplotype that is associated with a number of autoimmune conditions. Although many of the other loci that we chose failed to demonstrate an association, a candidate gene approach remains the most logical one, and the most likely to yield positive results in the future.

Familial clustering of polymorphic light eruption in relatives of patients with lupus erythematosus: evidence of a shared pathogenesis

BACKGROUND

Abnormal photosensitivity is a common feature of many forms of lupus erythematosus (LE).

OBJECTIVES

To examine the role of polymorphic light eruption (PLE) as a possible predisposing factor for cutaneous forms of LE.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with well-characterized subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and discoid LE (DLE) were recruited from outpatient clinics, and the prevalence of PLE determined by detailed interview and clinical examination.

RESULTS

Symptoms consistent with PLE were reported in 61% and 55% of SCLE and DLE patients, respectively; this was significantly higher than the overall population prevalence of 13.6% (P < 0.001), giving a relative risk (RR) for PLE in SCLE patients of 3.37 (95% confidence interval, CI 2.46--4.28) and DLE patients of 3.11 (95% CI 2.31--3.91). PLE developed before the onset of LE in 61% of cases (median interval 12 years, range 1--40), concomitantly in 24%, and subsequently in a further 15% (median interval 3.5 years, range 1--25). To delineate the relationship between PLE and LE further, the prevalence of PLE was determined in 103 otherwise unaffected first-degree relatives of SCLE and DLE probands; we had previously demonstrated clustering of PLE in families, reflecting a strong genetic component. We found a significantly higher PLE prevalence in relatives of the LE probands than in the general population (P < 0.001), giving an RR for PLE of 2.29 (95% CI 1.55--3.03) and 2.61 (95% CI 1.32--3.89) for female and male relatives, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of PLE in LE patients, together with clustering of PLE among first-degree relatives of SCLE and DLE probands, suggests that there may be a shared pathogenetic basis for PLE and cutaneous LE. We propose that predisposition to PLE may contribute to the LE phenotype in otherwise susceptible individuals.

Genetic modeling of abnormal photosensitivity in families with polymorphic light eruption and actinic prurigo

Actinic prurigo and polymorphic light eruption are two of the so-called idiopathic photodermatoses, resulting from abnormal cutaneous responses to ultraviolet radiation (photosensitivity). Whereas they are clinically distinct in most cases, there are sufficient similarities between them to suggest they may be related conditions. To take this further, we examined the prevalence of polymorphic light eruption in families ascertained through actinic prurigo probands, as evidence of a shared pathogenesis. We then determined the heritability of photosensitivity in 420 individuals from families ascertained through polymorphic light eruption and actinic prurigo probands using segregation analysis. Across 58 pedigrees the prevalence of photosensitivity in first-degree relatives was 20.9% compared with a population prevalence of 13.6%, giving a relative risk of 1.5 (confidence interval 1.15-2.0) and providing evidence of clustering within families. The prevalence of photosensitivity (predominantly polymorphic light eruption) in relatives of actinic prurigo probands was 23.7%, with a relative risk of 1.74 (confidence interval 1.24-2.36). Modeling for polymorphic light eruption across all pedigrees revealed a strong genetic component with polymorphic light eruption showing a dominant mixed mode of inheritance. The model parameters estimate that 72% of the U.K. population carry a low penetrance polymorphic light eruption susceptibility allele, but that among this highly prevalent genotype only 24% of susceptible females and 13% of susceptible males will have polymorphic light eruption. Expression of polymorphic light eruption in genetically susceptible individuals (intergenotype variance) is determined in large part by a polygenic component, with an important additional environmental component. In summary, this study provides clear evidence that polymorphic light eruption is an inherited condition. It also suggests that polymorphic light eruption and actinic prurigo share a common genetic background, supporting the view that actinic prurigo may represent a human leukocyte antigen-restricted subset of polymorphic light eruption.