Effect of indomethacin on the renal response to angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy subjects

Physiological confounders of renal blood flow measurement

OBJECTIVES

Renal blood flow (RBF) is controlled by a number of physiological factors that can contribute to the variability of its measurement. The purpose of this review is to assess the changes in RBF in response to a wide range of physiological confounders and derive practical recommendations on patient preparation and interpretation of RBF measurements with MRI.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to include articles reporting on physiological variations of renal perfusion, blood and/or plasma flow in healthy humans.

RESULTS

A total of 24 potential confounders were identified from the literature search and categorized into non-modifiable and modifiable factors. The non-modifiable factors include variables related to the demographics of a population (e.g. age, sex, and race) which cannot be manipulated but should be considered when interpreting RBF values between subjects. The modifiable factors include different activities (e.g. food/fluid intake, exercise training and medication use) that can be standardized in the study design. For each of the modifiable factors, evidence-based recommendations are provided to control for them in an RBF-measurement.

CONCLUSION

Future studies aiming to measure RBF are encouraged to follow a rigorous study design, that takes into account these recommendations for controlling the factors that can influence RBF results.

The effects of lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily vs. ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily on the blood pressure profiles of hypertensive osteoarthritis patients taking different classes of antihypertensive agents

AIMS

To examine whether the blood pressure (BP) profiles of lumiracoxib and high-dose ibuprofen differed in patients treated with different classes of antihypertensive medications.

METHODS

A 4-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study has compared the effects of lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily (od) (n = 394) and ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily (tid) (n = 393) on ambulatory BP in osteoarthritis (OA) patients with controlled hypertension. Here, we present subgroup analyses for patients receiving different antihypertensive classes. The primary outcome was a comparison of the change in 24-h mean systolic ambulatory BP (MSABP) from baseline to week 4. Patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) represented the largest subgroups receiving antihypertensive monotherapy.

RESULTS

For patients receiving an ARB monotherapy, the least squares mean (LSM) 24-h MSABP at week 4 fell with lumiracoxib 100 mg od and increased with ibuprofen 600 mg tid, creating an estimated treatment difference of 8.1 mmHg in favour of lumiracoxib (p < 0.001). For patients receiving an ACEI and a beta-blocker monotherapy, the estimated treatment difference was 8.2 mmHg (p < 0.001) and 5.8 mmHg (p = 0.002) in favour of lumiracoxib respectively. These treatment differences were greater than observed in the overall population (5.0 mmHg in favour of lumiracoxib). In patients receiving diuretics or calcium channel blockers, treatment differences in MSABP were smaller and not statistically significant, although they remained in favour of lumiracoxib.

CONCLUSION

Lumiracoxib 100 mg od resulted in less destabilisation of BP than high-dose ibuprofen 600 mg tid, and this effect was the greatest in subgroups treated with drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin system.

Renal effects of urodilatin in healthy subjects are independent of blockade of the cyclooxygenase and angiotensin II receptor

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the renal prostaglandins in modulating the renal vasoconstrictive and natriuretic effects of synthetic urodilatin (URO) in healthy humans.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve volunteers were pretreated in a randomized, single-blind, crossover study with losartan 50 mg a day or placebo for 5 days. Another 12 healthy subjects received indomethacin 25 mg three times a day or placebo for 4 days and a single dose on day 5. All subjects received a URO infusion (15 ng kg(-1) min(-1)) on day 5. Radioactive tracers and the lithium clearance technique were used.

RESULTS

The effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) decreased significantly during URO infusion: losartan pretreatment 573+/-63 to 461+/-76 mL/min versus placebo 540+/-89 to 432+/-90 mL/min. The urinary sodium excretion rate (UNa) increased significantly during URO infusion: losartan 335+/-115 to 502+/-134 umol/min (micromol/min) (UNa) versus placebo 386+/-142 to 476+/-137 umol/min (micromol/min) (UNa). In the indomethacin pretreated subjects, ERPF decreased significantly from 530+/-109 to 446+/-55 mL/min versus 533+/-89 to 449+/-69 mL/min in the placebo group. UNa increased significantly from 395+/-142 to 768+/-254 umol/min (micromol/min) (UNa) in the indomethacin group versus 282+/-117 to 552+/-242 umol/min (micromol/min) (UNa) in placebo.

CONCLUSION

The renal vasoconstrictive and natriuretic effects of synthetic URO are not modified by sustained inhibition of the angiotensin II receptor or the cyclooxygenase in man in a sodium replete state.

Renal angiotensin II receptors, hyperinsulinemia, and obesity

Angiotensin II, via activation of AT1 receptors in the kidney regulates sodium/fluid homeostasis and blood pressure. An exaggerated action of angiotensin II mediated via activation of AT1 receptors has been implicated in the increased renal sodium retention and the resetting of the pressure natriuresis in obesity related hypertension. Treatment of obese Zucker rats with AT1 receptor blockers reduces blood pressure to a greater extent and produces greater natriuresis. Also, there is an increased membranal AT1 receptor numbers and angiotensin II produces greater activation of sodium transporters in the isolated tubules from obese Zucker rats. Interestingly, AT2 receptors, which are believed to be beneficial to the renal and cardiovascular function in terms of their action on kidney and blood vessels, are greatly increased in proximal tubular membranes of obese Zucker rats. Whole animal and in vitro studies indicate that higher plasma insulin level, generally associated with obesity, is responsible for the up-regulation of both AT1 and AT2 receptors in the kidney. Determining the consequence of selective blocking of AT1 receptors and/or activation of the AT2 receptors on renal and cardiovascular function, and the effect of lowering insulin on these receptors present an important area of further investigation in obesity.

Increased renal vascular sensitivity to angiotensin II in hypertension is due to decreased response to prostaglandins

OBJECTIVES

An enhanced sensitivity to angiotensin II in the renal circulation has been demonstrated in the pre-hypertensive phase both in the spontaneously hypertensive rat and in man. To further characterize this abnormality and the role of prostanoids, renal haemodynamics in normotensive young men with a positive (PFH) or a negative (NFH) family history of hypertension were studied.

METHODS

Renal vascular reactivity was assessed during infusion of angiotensin II with and without inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Normotensive men with PFH (n = 13) and with NFH (n = 10) with a mean age of 38 years were given on two different occasions: (i). angiotensin II infusion i.v. (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 ng/kg per min) and (ii). angiotensin II infusion after inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis with indomethacin (150 mg daily three consecutive days). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow were measured with renal clearances of chromium edetic acid and para-aminohippuric acid.

RESULTS

Before angiotensin II challenge, the groups did not differ with respect to blood pressure, body mass index, plasma renin activity, GFR, renal blood flow (RBF) or urinary sodium excretion. There was no significant difference in systolic or diastolic blood pressure response to angiotensin II between the two groups. In PFH, the lowest angiotensin II dose caused a significant decrease in RBF and increase in renal vascular resistance (RVR) from baseline (P < 0.01 for both). In NFH, only the highest angiotensin II dose produced a significant decrease in RBF and increase in RVR (P < 0.01 for both). During inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, all three angiotensin II doses caused a significant decrease in RBF (P < 0.02) and increase in RVR (P < 0.02) also in NFH. The renal haemodynamic difference between PFH and NFH was thus eliminated.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that young human subjects with a positive family history of hypertension have a defective vasodilator prostaglandin system, which is responsible for increased renal vascular sensitivity to angiotensin II. Enhanced renal vasoconstriction may be an early event leading to the generation of primary hypertension.

Effects of celecoxib and rofecoxib on blood pressure and edema in patients > or =65 years of age with systemic hypertension and osteoarthritis

Concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) specific inhibitors, with antihypertensive medication is common practice for many patients with arthritis. This study evaluated the effects of celecoxib 200 mg/day and rofecoxib 25 mg/day on blood pressure (BP) and edema in a 6-week, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study in patients > or =65 years of age with osteoarthritis who were treated with fixed antihypertensive regimens. One thousand ninety-two patients received study medication (celecoxib, n = 549; rofecoxib, n = 543). Significantly more patients in the rofecoxib group compared with the celecoxib group developed increased systolic BP (change >20 mm Hg plus absolute value > or =140 mm Hg) at any time point (14.9% vs 6.9%, p <0.01). Rofecoxib caused the greatest increase in systolic BP in patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or beta blockers, whereas those on calcium channel antagonists or diuretic monotherapy receiving either celecoxib or rofecoxib showed no significant increases in BP. Clinically significant new-onset or worsening edema associated with weight gain developed in a greater percentage of patients in the rofecoxib group (7.7%) compared with the celecoxib group (4.7%) (p <0.05). Thus, in patients with controlled hypertension on a fixed antihypertensive regimen, careful monitoring of BP is warranted after the initiation of celecoxib or rofecoxib therapy.

Valsartan and the kidney: review of preclinical and clinical data

In both diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease, reducing blood pressure with antihypertensive therapy has beneficial effects on renal function. The key role of the renin-angiotensin system in blood pressure and volume homeostasis has long been established, but its importance for the overall normal functioning of the kidney itself is also increasingly being recognized. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, widely and successfully used in the treatment of hypertension, may also provide renal protection independent of blood pressure reduction; however, their relatively nonspecific mode of action in blocking an early metabolic step entails major clinical disadvantages, such as accumulation of bradykinin and substance P, that may cause the characteristic ACE-inhibitor side effects of persistent dry cough and, more rarely, angioneurotic edema. Angiotensin II antagonists or receptor blockers, a new class of antihypertensive agent, selectively antagonize the AT1 receptor subtype and, because of greater specificity, do not give rise to the side effects associated with ACE inhibitors. More important, these new drugs may have mechanistic advantages over other antihypertensives, including ACE inhibitors.

Angiotensin type 2 receptor mediates valsartan-induced hypotension in conscious rats

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system is associated with vasodilation and reduction in blood pressure. We hypothesized that angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor (AT(1)R) blockade is associated with increased production of renal nitric oxide (NO) mediated by release of bradykinin (BK). By use of a microdialysis technique, changes in renal interstitial fluid (RIF) BK, NO end products nitrite and nitrate (NOX), and cGMP were monitored in response to intravenous infusion of the AT(1)R blocker valsartan (10 mg/kg), the angiotensin type 2 (AT(2)) receptor (AT(2)R) blocker PD123319 (50 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), and the BK B(2) receptor blocker icatibant (10 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) in conscious rats (n=10) during low sodium intake. RIF BK, NOX, and cGMP significantly increased during valsartan treatment, whereas AT(2)R blockade caused a significant decrease in these autacoids. During icatibant infusion, RIF NOX and cGMP decreased by 64% and 40%, respectively, whereas BK increased. Combined administration of valsartan and icatibant, of valsartan and PD123319, or of valsartan, PD123319, and icatibant prevented the increase in RIF cGMP and NOX in response to valsartan alone. These data demonstrate that AT(1)R blockade with valsartan is associated with release of renal BK, which in turn mediates NO production. The results suggest that increased angiotensin II, in response to sodium restriction and valsartan infusion, stimulates AT(2)R, which mediates a BK and NO cascade.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system began as a way of studying the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease with specific pharmacological probes. Oral activity, achieved by shortening the original peptide structures, transformed the probes into therapeutic agents, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. However, ACE is a non-specific target for blocking the renin-angiotensin enzymatic cascade. The availability of orally active drugs turned ACE inhibition into a therapeutic breakthrough but more specific blockade always seemed desirable. This goal has now been achieved with the orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonists; six are on the market and more are under development. This new class of drugs is equal in efficacy to ACE inhibitors, at least in hypertensive patients. Trials now underway will demonstrate whether angiotensin II receptor antagonists can prevent target-organ damage and reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. If they do, these compounds might one day replace ACE inhibitors.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists in hypertension

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is now recognized as an effective approach to the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Today, it is possible to antagonize the effects of angiotensin II more specifically by blocking its receptors by using nonpeptide receptor antagonists. These compounds that first have been used to recognize the various subtypes of angiotensin II receptors are now available clinically. Four of them have recently been launched on the market and several others are preregistered for the treatment of hypertension. These new molecules are as effective as ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists and beta-blockers in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients. When compared to ACE inhibitors, they appear to have comparable favorable effects on systemic and renal hemodynamic properties. One of the major characteristics of angiotensin II receptor antagonists as a class is the excellent tolerability with an incidence of side effects that is generally similar to that of placebo. Large clinical trials are now underway to demonstrate the long-term benefits of these agents in hypertension, heart failure and type II diabetic nephropathy.