Clinical relevance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator, its receptor and inhibitor type 1 in ovarian cancer

Malignant Ascites in Ovarian Cancer: Cellular, Acellular, and Biophysical Determinants of Molecular Characteristics and Therapy Response

Ascites refers to the abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneum resulting from an underlying pathology, such as metastatic cancer. Among all cancers, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is most frequently associated with the production of malignant ascites and is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies. Despite decades of evidence showing that the accumulation of peritoneal fluid portends the poorest outcomes for cancer patients, the role of malignant ascites in promoting metastasis and therapy resistance remains poorly understood. This review summarizes the current understanding of malignant ascites, with a focus on ovarian cancer. The first section provides an overview of heterogeneity in ovarian cancer and the pathophysiology of malignant ascites. Next, analytical methods used to characterize the cellular and acellular components of malignant ascites, as well the role of these components in modulating cell biology, are discussed. The review then provides a perspective on the pressures and forces that tumors are subjected to in the presence of malignant ascites and the impact of physical stress on therapy resistance. Treatment options for malignant ascites, including surgical, pharmacological and photochemical interventions are then discussed to highlight challenges and opportunities at the interface of drug discovery, device development and physical sciences in oncology.

Complex interactomes and post-translational modifications of the regulatory proteins HABP4 and SERBP1 suggest pleiotropic cellular functions

The 57 kDa antigen recognized by the Ki-1 antibody, is also known as intracellular hyaluronic acid binding protein 4 and shares 40.7% identity and 67.4% similarity with serpin mRNA binding protein 1, which is also named CGI-55, or plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1-RNA binding protein-1, indicating that they might be paralog proteins, possibly with similar or redundant functions in human cells. Through the identification of their protein interactomes, both regulatory proteins have been functionally implicated in transcriptional regulation, mRNA metabolism, specifically RNA splicing, the regulation of mRNA stability, especially, in the context of the progesterone hormone response, and the DNA damage response. Both proteins also show a complex pattern of post-translational modifications, involving Ser/Thr phosphorylation, mainly through protein kinase C, arginine methylation and SUMOylation, suggesting that their functions and locations are highly regulated. Furthermore, they show a highly dynamic cellular localization pattern with localizations in both the cytoplasm and nucleus as well as punctuated localizations in both granular cytoplasmic protein bodies, upon stress, and nuclear splicing speckles. Several reports in the literature show altered expressions of both regulatory proteins in a series of cancers as well as mutations in their genes that may contribute to tumorigenesis. This review highlights important aspects of the structure, interactome, post-translational modifications, sub-cellular localization and function of both regulatory proteins and further discusses their possible functions and their potential as tumor markers in different cancer settings.

Relationships of protein biomarkers of the urokinase plasminogen activator system with expression of their cognate genes in primary breast carcinomas

Background

uPA, its receptor uPAR, and inhibitors PAI‐1 and PAI‐2 play key roles in membrane remodeling/invasion and in predicting response to chemotherapy. We identified novel relationships of these biomarkers with ER/PR that indicate clinical utility for assessing breast carcinoma outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective studies were performed with de‐identified results of (a) uPA, uPAR, and PAI‐1; (b) estrogen (ER) and progestin receptor (PR); and (c) clinical outcomes. Relative expression of 22 000 genes from microarray of RNA from LCM‐procured breast cancer cells was used with R Studio version 3.4.1.

Results

Primary ER/PR status was related to uPA, uPAR, or PAI‐1 levels. ER− or PR− cancers expressed elevated uPA, uPAR, and PAI2 mRNA compared to ER+ or PR+ cells. Inverse relationships between ER/PR protein and expression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI‐2 were observed, whereas HER2 status was unrelated. qPCR analyses showed RERG and NQO‐1 expressions were elevated in uPA− lesions, while CD34 and EDG‐1 were elevated in uPAR− cancers. ERBB4 was overexpressed in PAI‐1+ carcinomas. Cox regression analyses revealed relationships of ER/PR status and uPA system members with regard to clinical outcomes of breast cancer.

Conclusions

uPA, uPAR, PAI1, or PAI2 expression was increased in either ER− or PR− cancers similar to that of protein content in ER−/PR− carcinomas, suggesting sex hormones regulate the uPA system in breast cancer. Results revealed protein content of uPA system members was related to ER/PR status of primary lesions. Use of LCM‐procured carcinoma cells uncovered relationships between expression of known cancer−associated genes and protein content of uPA system members. Collectively, results indicate evaluation of ER and PR protein of primary breast cancers combined with analyses of uPA, uPAR, and PAI‐1 protein content improves assessment of clinical outcomes.

CRISPR/Cas9 nickase mediated targeting of urokinase receptor gene inhibits neuroblastoma cell proliferation

Neuroblastoma is a tumor arising from pluripotent sympathoadrenal precursor cells of neural cell origin. Neuroblastoma is one of the most aggressive childhood tumors with highly invasive and metastatic potential. The increased expression of urokinase and its receptor is often associated with a negative prognosis in neuroblastoma patients.

We have shown that targeting of the Plaur gene in mouse neuroblastoma Neuro 2A cells by CRISPR/Cas9n results in ~60% decrease in cell proliferation (p<0.05), reduction in the number of Ki-67 positive cells, caspase 3 activation and PARP-1 cleavage. Knockout of uPAR leads to downregulation of mRNA encoding full-length TrkC receptor, which is involved in p38^MAPK and Akt signalling pathways. This finding provides a rationale to study a role of uPAR in neuroblastoma progression, since uPAR could be considered a potential therapeutic target in neuroblastoma treatment.

Function and clinical relevance of kallikrein-related peptidases and other serine proteases in gynecological cancers

Gynecological cancers, including malignant tumors of the ovaries, the endometrium and the cervix, account for approximately 10% of tumor-associated deaths in women of the Western world. For screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy response prediction, the group of enzymes known as serine (Ser-)proteases show great promise as biomarkers. In the present review, following a summary of the clinical facts regarding malignant tumors of the ovaries, the endometrium and the cervix, and characterization of the most important Ser-proteases, we thoroughly review the current state of knowledge relating to the use of proteases as biomarkers of the most frequent gynecological cancers. Within the Ser-protease group, the kallikrein-related peptidase (KLK) family, which encompasses a subgroup of 15 members, holds particular promise, with some acting via a tumor-promoting mechanism and others behaving as protective factors. Further, the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) seem to play an unfavorable role in gynecological tumors, while down-regulation of high-temperature requirement proteins A 1, 2 and 3 (HtrA1,2,3) is associated with malignant disease and cancer progression. Expression/activity levels of other Ser-proteases, including the type II transmembrane Ser-proteases (TTSPs) matriptase, hepsin (TMPRSS1), and the hepsin-related protease (TMPRSS3), as well as the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored Ser-proteases prostasin and testisin, may be of clinical relevance in gynecological cancers. In conclusion, proteases are a rich source of biomarkers of gynecological cancer, though the enzymes' exact roles and functions merit further investigation.

Overexpression of SERBP1 (Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 RNA binding protein) in human breast cancer is correlated with favourable prognosis

Background

Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) overexpression is an important prognostic and predictive biomarker in human breast cancer. SERBP1, a protein that is supposed to regulate the stability of PAI-1 mRNA, may play a role in gynaecological cancers as well, since upregulation of SERBP1 was described in ovarian cancer recently. This is the first study to present a systematic characterisation of SERBP1 expression in human breast cancer and normal breast tissue at both the mRNA and the protein level.

Methods

Using semiquantitative realtime PCR we analysed SERBP1 expression in different normal human tissues (n = 25), and in matched pairs of normal (n = 7) and cancerous breast tissues (n = 7). SERBP1 protein expression was analysed in two independent cohorts on tissue microarrays (TMAs), an initial evaluation set, consisting of 193 breast carcinomas and 48 normal breast tissues, and a second large validation set, consisting of 605 breast carcinomas. In addition, a collection of benign (n = 2) and malignant (n = 6) mammary cell lines as well as breast carcinoma lysates (n = 16) were investigated for SERBP1 expression by Western blot analysis. Furthermore, applying non-radioisotopic in situ hybridisation a subset of normal (n = 10) and cancerous (n = 10) breast tissue specimens from the initial TMA were analysed for SERBP1 mRNA expression.

Results

SERBP1 is not differentially expressed in breast carcinoma compared to normal breast tissue, both at the RNA and protein level. However, recurrence-free survival analysis showed a significant correlation (P = 0.008) between abundant SERBP1 expression in breast carcinoma and favourable prognosis. Interestingly, overall survival analysis also displayed a tendency (P = 0.09) towards favourable prognosis when SERBP1 was overexpressed in breast cancer.

Conclusions

The RNA-binding protein SERBP1 is abundantly expressed in human breast cancer and may represent a novel breast tumour marker with prognostic significance. Its potential involvement in the plasminogen activator protease cascade warrants further investigation.

Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), and inhibitor (PAI-1) in human breast carcinomas and their clinical relevance

Serine proteases convert plasminogen to plasmin which is involved in tissue remodeling under physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions, including breast carcinoma invasion and progression. Both urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and pro-uPA associate with uPA receptor (uPAR) on target cells, where plasminogen activator inhibitors (e.g., PAI-1) may modulate their activities. Expression levels of these factors were compared in breast carcinomas relative to patient characteristics, carcinoma features, and clinical outcome. uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in extracts of 226 biopsies while estrogen receptor (ER) and progestin receptor (PR) were determined by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or radio-ligand binding. Each set of assays contained a novel reference specimen with known quantities of each of these five analytes. Levels in ng/mg protein of these biomarkers exhibited ranges: uPA (0-12.3); uPAR (0-19.5); PAI-1 (0-91.2). When considered independently, expression of uPA, uPAR, or PAI-1 was unrelated to patient age or menopausal status. Although no correlation was observed between each analyte with stage, grade, or ER/PR status, levels appeared to differ with pathology and nodal status. A dendrogram from hierarchical clustering of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 levels in 106 specimens revealed three clusters of breast cancer patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 indicated a correlation with overall survival (OS), suggesting collective examination of these biomarkers is useful in predicting clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Clinical utility of level-of-evidence-1 disease forecast cancer biomarkers uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1

The prognostic and/or predictive value of the cancer biomarkers, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor (plasminogen activator inhibitor [PAI]-1), determined by ELISA in tumor-tissue extracts, was demonstrated for several cancer types in numerous clinically relevant retrospective or prospective studies, including a multicenter breast cancer therapy trial (Chemo-N0). Consequently, for the first time ever for any cancer biomarker for breast cancer, uPA and PAI-1 have reached the highest level of evidence, level-of-evidence-1. At present, two other breast cancer therapy trials, NNBC-3 and Plan B, also incorporating uPA and PAI-1 as treatment-assignment tools are in effect. Furthermore, small synthetic molecules targeting uPA are currently in Phase II clinical trials in patients afflicted with advanced cancer of the ovary, breast or pancreas.

Targeting the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor inhibits ovarian cancer metastasis

PURPOSE

To understand the functional and preclinical efficacy of targeting the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (u-PAR) in ovarian cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Expression of u-PAR was studied in 162 epithelial ovarian cancers, including 77 pairs of corresponding primary and metastatic tumors. The effect of an antibody against u-PAR (ATN-658) on proliferation, adhesion, invasion, apoptosis, and migration was assessed in 3 (SKOV3ip1, HeyA8, and CaOV3) ovarian cancer cell lines. The impact of the u-PAR antibody on tumor weight, number, and survival was examined in corresponding ovarian cancer xenograft models and the mechanism by which ATN-658 blocks metastasis was explored.

RESULTS

Only 8% of all ovarian tumors were negative for u-PAR expression. Treatment of SKOV3ip1, HeyA8, and CaOV3 ovarian cancer cell lines with the u-PAR antibody inhibited cell invasion, migration, and adhesion. In vivo, anti-u-PAR treatment reduced the number of tumors and tumor weight in CaOV3 and SKOV3ip1 xenografts and reduced tumor weight and increased survival in HeyA8 xenografts. Immunostaining of CaOV3 xenograft tumors and ovarian cancer cell lines showed an increase in active-caspase 3 and TUNEL staining. Treatment with u-PAR antibody inhibited α(5)-integrin and u-PAR colocalization on primary human omental extracellular matrix. Anti-u-PAR treatment also decreased the expression of urokinase, u-PAR, β(3)-integrin, and fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that an antibody against u-PAR reduces metastasis, induces apoptosis, and reduces the interaction between u-PAR and α(5)-integrin. This provides a rationale for targeting the u-PAR pathway in patients with ovarian cancer and for further testing of ATN-658 in this indication.

The plasminogen activator inhibitor "paradox" in cancer

Proteolysis in general and specifically the plasminogen activating system regulated by urokinase (uPA) its specific receptor, the GPI membrane anchored urokinase receptor (uPAR) and the specific plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) plays a major role in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, tumor invasion and metastasis formation. This is exemplified by a body of published work showing a positive correlation between the expression of uPA or uPAR in several tumors and their malignancy. It is generally assumed that such a "pro-malignant" effect of the uPA-uPAR system is mediated by increased local proteolysis thus favoring tumor invasion, by a pro-angiogenic effect of this system and also by uPA-uPAR signaling towards the tumor thereby shifting the tumor phenotype to a more "malignant" one. However, when tumor patients are analyzed for long term survival, those with high levels of the inhibitor of the system, PAI-1 have a much worse prognosis than those with lower PAI-1 levels. This indicates that increased overall proteolysis alone cannot be made responsible for the adverse effects of the plasminogen activating system in tumors. Moreover, it becomes increasingly evident that components of the fibrinolytic system secreted by the tumor cells themselves are not solely responsible for a correlation between the plasminogen activating system and tumor malignancy; components of the plasminogen activating system secreted by stroma cells or cells of the immune system such as macrophages contribute also to the impact of fibrinolysis on malignancy. This review summarizes the evidence for the role of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in mediating the malignant phenotype and possible mechanism thereby trying to explain the "PAI-1 paradox in cancer" on a molecular level.

Role of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) for prognosis in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) contribute to the invasiveness of many carcinomas. Here, we studied a possible association between cytosolic uPA and PA-1 concentrations in tumor tissue with prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Cytosolic concentrations of uPA and PAI-1 were determined in 69 primary endothelial adenocarcinomas using an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). A possible influence of uPA and PAI-1 was studied by multivariate Cox regression adjusting for the established clinical prognostic factors FIGO-stage, grading, depth of invasion, diabetes mellitus and age.

RESULTS

Both uPA (p=0.011) and PAI-1 (p=0.003) were associated with relapse free time using the multivariate proportional hazards model. Association with overall survival was less pronounced with p=0.021 for uPA and p=0.358 for PAI-1. Concentrations of PAI-1 increased with FIGO stage (p=0.003) and with histological grading (p=0.005). Both uPA and PAI-1 concentrations were negatively correlated with estrogen and progesterone receptor levels.

CONCLUSION

The combination of high cytosolic concentrations of uPA (>5 ng/mg total protein) and high PAI-1 (>20 ng/mg total protein) may reveal a group of patients with increased risk of progression.

Critical involvement of ILK in TGFbeta1-stimulated invasion/migration of human ovarian cancer cells is associated with urokinase plasminogen activator system

The present study investigated the role of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in TGFbeta1-stimulated invasion/migration of human ovarian cancer cells. We investigated TGFbeta1 regulation of ILK, and effects of ILK knockdown on TGFbeta1-stimulated invasion/migration and the associated proteinase systems, urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in SKOV3 cells. TGFbeta1 stimulated ILK kinase activity, and had no effect on ILK protein/mRNA levels. Transient transfection of an ILK-specific siRNA (ILK-H) reduced ILK protein level, mRNA level and kinase activity. ILK knockdown by ILK-H suppressed the basal and TGFbeta1-stimulated invasion and migration. Further, ILK-H reduced the basal and TGFbeta1-stimulated secretion of uPA, and increased the secretion of its inhibitor (PAI-1). Conversely, ILK-H did not affect TGFbeta1-stimulated secretion of MMP2 and its cell-associated activator MT1-MMP. Additionally, TGFbeta1 activated Smad2 phosphorylation, and this was not affected by ILK knockdown. Earlier reports indicate that Smad2 activation increased the expression of MMP2 and MT1-MMP. Thus, TGFbeta1 may act through ILK-independent and Smad2-dependent signaling in regulating MMP2 and MT1-MMP in SKOV3 cells. Collectively, this study suggests that ILK serves as a key mediator in TGFbeta1 regulation of uPA/PAI-1 system critical for the invasiveness of human ovarian cancer cells. And ILK is a potential target for cancer therapy.

Ascites induces modulation of alpha6beta1 integrin and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor expression and associated functions in ovarian carcinoma

Interactions between cancer cells and the surrounding medium are not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrate that ascites induces selective changes in the expression of integrins and urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPA/uPAR) in ovarian cancer cells. We hypothesise that this change of integrin and uPA/uPAR expression triggers signalling pathways responsible for modulating phenotype-dependent functional changes in ovarian cancer cells. Human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cell lines and epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines were treated with ascites for 48 h. Ascites induced upregulation of alpha6 integrin, without any change in the expression of alphav, beta1 and beta4 integrin subunits. Out of the four ovarian cancer cell lines studied, ascites induced enhancement in the expression of uPA/uPAR in the more invasive OVCA 433 and HEY cell lines without any change in the noninvasive OVHS1 and moderately invasive PEO.36 cell lines. On the other hand, no change in the expression of alpha6 integrin or uPAR, in response to ascites, was observed in HOSE cells. In response to ascites, enhancement in proliferation and in adhesion was observed in all four ovarian cancer cell lines studied. In contrast, no significant increase in proliferation or adhesion by ascites was observed in HOSE cells. Ascites-induced expression of uPA/uPAR correlated with the increased invasiveness of HEY and OVCA 433 cell lines but was not seen in OVHS1, PEO.36 and HOSE cell lines. Upregulation of alpha6 integrin and uPA/uPAR correlated with the activation of Ras and downstream Erk pathways. Ascites-induced activation of Ras and downstream Erk can be inhibited by using inhibitory antibodies against alpha6 and beta1 integrin and uPAR, consistent with the inhibition of proliferation, adhesion and invasive functions of ovarian cancer cell lines. Based on these findings, we conclude that ascites can induce selective upregulation of integrin and uPA/uPAR in ovarian cancer cells and these changes may modulate the functions of ovarian carcinomas.

Ascites induces modulation of alpha6beta1 integrin and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor expression and associated functions in ovarian carcinoma

Interactions between cancer cells and the surrounding medium are not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrate that ascites induces selective changes in the expression of integrins and urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPA/uPAR) in ovarian cancer cells. We hypothesise that this change of integrin and uPA/uPAR expression triggers signalling pathways responsible for modulating phenotype-dependent functional changes in ovarian cancer cells. Human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cell lines and epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines were treated with ascites for 48 h. Ascites induced upregulation of alpha6 integrin, without any change in the expression of alphav, beta1 and beta4 integrin subunits. Out of the four ovarian cancer cell lines studied, ascites induced enhancement in the expression of uPA/uPAR in the more invasive OVCA 433 and HEY cell lines without any change in the noninvasive OVHS1 and moderately invasive PEO.36 cell lines. On the other hand, no change in the expression of alpha6 integrin or uPAR, in response to ascites, was observed in HOSE cells. In response to ascites, enhancement in proliferation and in adhesion was observed in all four ovarian cancer cell lines studied. In contrast, no significant increase in proliferation or adhesion by ascites was observed in HOSE cells. Ascites-induced expression of uPA/uPAR correlated with the increased invasiveness of HEY and OVCA 433 cell lines but was not seen in OVHS1, PEO.36 and HOSE cell lines. Upregulation of alpha6 integrin and uPA/uPAR correlated with the activation of Ras and downstream Erk pathways. Ascites-induced activation of Ras and downstream Erk can be inhibited by using inhibitory antibodies against alpha6 and beta1 integrin and uPAR, consistent with the inhibition of proliferation, adhesion and invasive functions of ovarian cancer cell lines. Based on these findings, we conclude that ascites can induce selective upregulation of integrin and uPA/uPAR in ovarian cancer cells and these changes may modulate the functions of ovarian carcinomas.

Ascites induces modulation of alpha6beta1 integrin and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor expression and associated functions in ovarian carcinoma

Interactions between cancer cells and the surrounding medium are not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrate that ascites induces selective changes in the expression of integrins and urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPA/uPAR) in ovarian cancer cells. We hypothesise that this change of integrin and uPA/uPAR expression triggers signalling pathways responsible for modulating phenotype-dependent functional changes in ovarian cancer cells. Human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cell lines and epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines were treated with ascites for 48 h. Ascites induced upregulation of alpha6 integrin, without any change in the expression of alphav, beta1 and beta4 integrin subunits. Out of the four ovarian cancer cell lines studied, ascites induced enhancement in the expression of uPA/uPAR in the more invasive OVCA 433 and HEY cell lines without any change in the noninvasive OVHS1 and moderately invasive PEO.36 cell lines. On the other hand, no change in the expression of alpha6 integrin or uPAR, in response to ascites, was observed in HOSE cells. In response to ascites, enhancement in proliferation and in adhesion was observed in all four ovarian cancer cell lines studied. In contrast, no significant increase in proliferation or adhesion by ascites was observed in HOSE cells. Ascites-induced expression of uPA/uPAR correlated with the increased invasiveness of HEY and OVCA 433 cell lines but was not seen in OVHS1, PEO.36 and HOSE cell lines. Upregulation of alpha6 integrin and uPA/uPAR correlated with the activation of Ras and downstream Erk pathways. Ascites-induced activation of Ras and downstream Erk can be inhibited by using inhibitory antibodies against alpha6 and beta1 integrin and uPAR, consistent with the inhibition of proliferation, adhesion and invasive functions of ovarian cancer cell lines. Based on these findings, we conclude that ascites can induce selective upregulation of integrin and uPA/uPAR in ovarian cancer cells and these changes may modulate the functions of ovarian carcinomas.

Role of urokinase plasminogen activator and its receptor in metastasis and invasion of neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine proteinase that has been suggested to play an important role in tumor invasion and metastasis. It binds to a specific membrane receptor, uPA receptor (uPAR), and activates plasminogen to form plasmin, which participates in tissue degradation and proteolysis. Binding of uPA to its receptor accelerates the activation of uPA from pro-uPA, enhancing the activity of the uPA/uPAR cascade. Because of the high metastatic and invasive potential of neuroblastoma (NB) cells, the authors have analyzed in the current study, the concomitant of uPA and its receptor in NB.

METHODS

The expression and distribution of uPA and uPAR were analyzed by immunostaining in 52 neuroblastoma tissues; at the same time we use the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for neuroendocrine protein gene products 9.5 (PGP 9.5) mRNA to detect small numbers of NB cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow (BM) and study the relationship uPA and uPAR to the ability of invasion and metastasis of NB cells. To identify risk factors for disease progression, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of clinical (age, sex, and risk group) and tumor biologic markers (histology, MYCN, DNA ploidy, chromosome 1 p, PGP9.5, uPA, uPAR, and combined uPA and uPAR) in all patients. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The results of immunohistochemistry showed that uPA and uPAR were localized mainly in the membrane and cytoplasm of tumor cells. The positive rate of uPA in the high-risk group (23 of 25, 92.0%) was remarkably higher than that in intermediate-risk group (8 of 17, 47.1%) and low-risk group (3 of 10, 30.0%), in UH (26 of 29, 89.7%) was higher than in FH (8 of 23, 34.8%), respectively, and statistical significance was remarkable both P < .01). Similar results were obtained for uPAR. The positive rate of uPAR in the high-risk group (22 of 25, 88.0%) was substantially higher compared with that in intermediate-risk group (6 of 17, 35.3%) and low-risk group (2 of 10, 20.0%; P < .01). The positive rate of uPAR in UH (24 of 29, 82.8%) was higher compared with that in FH (6 of 23, 26.1%), and statistical significance was remarkable (P < .01). PGP9.5 mRNA in peripheral blood and BM was detected in 24 of 52 (45.2%) patients. The positive rate of PGP 9.5 mRNA in peripheral blood and BM in the cases positive for uPA (22 of 34, 64.7%) was markedly higher than that in the cases negative for uPA (11.1%, 2 of 18), and statistical significance was remarkable (P < .01). There was significant difference in the positive rate of PGP9.5 mRNA between the group positive for uPAR (66.7%, 20 of 30) and the group negative for uPAR (18.2%, 4 of 22), and a larger difference was found between the group positive for both uPA and uPAR (73.1%, 19 of 26) and the group negative for uPA or uPAR (19.2%, 5 of 26). The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates at 5 years for all patients were, respectively, 70% +/- 3% and 63% +/- 3% with a median follow-up of 65 months (range 13 to 20). Among all the biologic and clinical features analyzed, multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression showed that age, MYCN, and combined uPA and uPAR remained significant predictors for both OS and EFS (P < .01, respectively). Both EFS rate and OS rate were significantly better for patients who positively expressed uPA and uPAR than those who negatively expressed uPA or uPAR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that uPA and uPAR were overexpressed in high-risk and UH tumor of NB, and that overexpression of both factors was associated with the ability of invasion, metastasis, and prognosis of NB. The presence of high levels of combined uPA and uPAR may be a new prognostic marker that would allow us to identify patients with poorer prognosis who might benefit from more aggressive surgical and adjuvant treatment.

Expression of active plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 reduces cell migration and invasion in breast and gynecological cancer cells

Urokinase-type (uPA) plasminogen activator is regulated by serine protease inhibitors (serpins), especially plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). In many cancers, uPA and PAI-1 contribute to the invasive phenotype. We examined the in vitro migration and invasive capabilities of breast, ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cell lines compared to their plasminogen activator system profiles. We then overexpressed active wild-type PAI-1 and an inactive "substrate" P14 form of PAI-1 (T333R) using stable transfection and adenoviral gene delivery. We also upregulated endogenous uPA and PAI-1 in these cells by treatment with transforming growth factor-beta. Some breast and ovarian cancer cell lines with natural expression of uPA, PAI-1, and urokinase receptor showed substantial migration and invasion compared to other cell lines that lack expression of these proteins. However, overexpression of active wild-type PAI-1, but not P14-PAI-1 (T333R), in these cell lines showed reduced migration and invasion. Since vitronectin binding by both forms of PAI-1 is equivalent, these results imply that PAI-1-vitronectin interactions are less critical in altering migration and invasion. Our results show that the in vitro migratory and invasive phenotype in these breast and ovarian cancer cell lines is reduced by active PAI-1 due to its ability to inhibit plasminogen activation.

Clinical significance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expression in cancer

The involvement of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system in particular has been extensively studied in the pathogenesis of cancer. The molecular role of the uPA receptor (uPAR) is well characterized with its participation in cell migration and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. Over-expression of uPAR in cancer has been demonstrated in many studies and is considered an attractive target for anticancer agents. We and others have down-regulated uPAR expression in an attempt to inhibit cancer metastasis based on its molecular role. Uniquely, uPAR which is a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchored protein is not only bound to the cell surface but also has a soluble form, suPAR. There is now accumulated clinical and experimental evidence supporting the significant role of uPAR and its soluble counterpart in a number of solid cancers. The expression of uPAR can be associated with tumor cells or stromal cells or both. Differences observed in the expression of uPAR using immunohistochemistry (IHC) are likely explained by the use of different antibodies and techniques rather than true cellular differences and are reviewed here. This review summarizes the clinical relevance of uPAR and its soluble form in the prognosis and diagnosis of different cancers.

Cathepsin D in ovarian cancer: prognostic value and correlation with p53 expression and microvessel density

OBJECTIVE

Overexpression of ubiquitous lysosomal aspartyl protease cathepsin D (CD) is involved in the progression of cancer. This study investigates the prognostic value and the association of cathepsin D expression with clinicopathological parameters, p53 expression, and angiogenesis in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Cathepsin D was determined immunohistochemically in 43 ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (LMP) and 80 invasive tumors FIGO stage I-IV. Results were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics, p53, and microvessel density (MVD). Survival analysis of cathepsin D expression and MVD was performed in invasive tumors.

RESULTS

Epithelial tumor cathepsin D expression was more common in LMP tumors (65.1%) compared to invasive tumors (43.7%; P = 0.02). In LMP tumors, stromal cathepsin D was associated with mucinous tumors (P = 0.01), whereas in invasive tumors, epithelial cathepsin D expression was associated with clear cell tumors (P = 0.003). Invasive tumor cathepsin D had a negative relation to p53 expression. In LMP tumors, stromal cathepsin D correlated with microvessel density (P = 0.03). Stromal cathepsin D expression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with invasive cancer (P = 0.03, Cox regression), while cathepsin D expression missed to be of prognostic value for overall survival (OS) in invasive ovarian cancer. MVD had no influence on survival in invasive ovarian cancer (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates a prognostic value of cathepsin D expression in invasive ovarian cancer, while cathepsin D expression in LMP tumors seems to be linked to angiogenesis. The relation among cathepsin D, p53 expression, and angiogenesis demonstrates biological differences between invasive ovarian cancer and LMP tumors.