HELP apheresis in the treatment of sepsis

The potential of heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation (H.E.L.P.)-apheresis for patients with severe acute or chronic COVID-19

Patients with long COVID and acute COVID should benefit from treatment with H.E.L.P. apheresis, which is in clinical use for 37 years. COVID-19 can cause a severe acute multi-organ illness and, subsequently, in many patients the chronic illness long-COVID/PASC. The alveolar tissue and adjacent capillaries show inflammatory and procoagulatory activation with cell necrosis, thrombi, and massive fibrinoid deposits, namely, unsolvable microthrombi, which results in an obstructed gas exchange. Heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation (H.E.L.P.) apheresis solves these problems by helping the entire macro- and microcirculation extracorporeally. It uses unfractionated heparin, which binds the spike protein and thereby should remove the virus (debris). It dissolves the forming microthrombi without bleeding risk. It removes large amounts of fibrinogen (coagulation protein), which immediately improves the oxygen supply in the capillaries. In addition, it removes the precursors of both the procoagulatory and the fibrinolytic cascade, thus de-escalating the entire hemostaseological system. It increases myocardial, cerebral, and pulmonary blood flow rates, and coronary flow reserve, facilitating oxygen exchange in the capillaries, without bleeding risks. Another factor in COVID is the “cytokine storm” harming microcirculation in the lungs and other organs. Intervention by H.E.L.P. apheresis could prevent uncontrollable coagulation and inflammatory activity by removing cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, and reduces C-reactive protein, and eliminating endo- and ecto-toxins, without touching protective IgM/IgG antibodies, leukocyte, or platelet function. The therapy can be used safely in combination with antiviral drugs, antibiotics, anticoagulants, or antihypertensive drugs. Long-term clinical experience with H.E.L.P. apheresis shows it cannot inflict harm upon patients with COVID-19.

Apheresis as emerging treatment option in severe early onset preeclampsia

Based on an early suggestion by Winkler et al. 2003 and a subsequent successful study by Wang et al. 2006 using lipid apheresis (LA) in 9 patients with preeclampsia to prolong pregnancies, the use of apheresis as therapeutic option in severe early onset preeclampsia has received increasing attention. Further studies using different LA systems also prolonged pregnancy and have been published in the last few years. Albeit using different LA systems and relying on different working hypothesis, all studies demonstrated a promising stabilisation against the disease's progression. Overall time from hospitalisation to the need for mandatory delivery was longer for those patients receiving apheresis compared to historical or matched control patients not receiving apheresis. These data will be reviewed and different hypotheses about the beneficial mechanism of action of apheresis will be discussed. Since up to now there is no curative treatment for preeclampsia other than observation and delivery, future work shall be encouraged.

A new method for removing endotoxin from plasma using hemocompatible affinity chromatography technology, applicable for extracorporeal treatment of septic patients

The pathogenesis of sepsis begins with the proliferation of micro-organisms at a site of infection, followed by invasion of the bloodstream and other organs. Gram-negative bacteria account for a large part of sepsis cases. The structural component of Gram-negative bacteria, endotoxin or lipopolysaccharide (LPS), induces the synthesis and release of endogenous mediators of sepsis. A growing number of investigations of the molecular mechanisms occurring in sepsis, point to endotoxin as a central mediator leading to multi-organ failure and death. In numerous clinical trials, attempts to target molecules downstream of endotoxin have been made, but have not been associated with improved survival. We describe an affinity-based system for the selective removal of endotoxin from plasma. The small-scale device, a 1.5 ml cartridge, contains beads that bind endotoxin with high specificity and efficiency. In addition, evidence is presented that this device does not affect plasma hemostasis, nor does it activate the complement system. Taken together, these results represent a proof of principle for endotoxin removal from plasma, which may be of clinical value to treat sepsis by extracorporeal circulation of the blood through a scaled-up version of this endotoxin-removing device.

Lipid and low-density-lipoprotein apheresis. Effects on plasma inflammatory profile and on cytokine pattern in patients with severe dyslipidemia

Available evidence on the effects of therapeutic plasmapheresis (TP) techniques and in particular lipid- and LDL-apheresis (LDL-a) on plasmatic inflammatory mediators including cytokines were reviewed. Studies on this issue are not numerous. However, the review of existing evidence clearly suggests an active role of apheresis on the profile of inflammatory molecules and on cytokine pattern in plasma. These non-lipid-lowering effects can be defined to some extent pleiotropic or pleiotropic-equivalent. Although further studies are desirable, the data reported in this review confirm that lipid- and LDL-a not only show acute lipid-lowering and cholesterol-lowering effects, but also efficacy in reducing several proinflammatory peptides, including cytokines. This effect was not related apparently to lipids and lipoproteins reduction. Thus, TP (lipid- and LDL-a), commonly utilized in the treatment of severe genetically determined lipid disorders, unresponsive to hypolipidemic drugs, offers new possibilities of interpretation of its role in the mechanisms leading to the blockade of atherosclerotic lesion development and progression. The ability of TP on short-term to induce such a profound change in the plasmatic metabolic and inflammatory profiles must be kept in mind in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, before and after interventions of coronary revascularization, and in the acute phase of cerebrovascular ischemia, at least in patients with severe dyslipidemia. Further studies are needed, in particular aimed at assessing if circulating cytokines may be downregulated by TP not only by direct removal, but through indirect effects on both gene translation and transcription perhaps via the cytokine receptor function.

Sepsis strategies in development

Severe sepsis, defined as inflammation and organ failure due to infection, continues to result in a mortality of approximately 30% despite advances in critical care. Current therapy includes timely administration of antibiotics, source control of infection, aggressive fluid resuscitation, support of failing organs, and use of activated protein C where clinically indicated. Bacterial mediators, including endotoxin and superantigens, as well endogenous proinflammatory cytokines are considered important to the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced organ failure and are being targeted with numerous molecules and removal devices. Additional therapeutic strategies are aimed at restoring the natural anticoagulant levels, blocking deleterious effects of the complement cascade, reversing cytopathic hypoxia, and inhibiting excessive lymphocyte apoptosis. Molecules with pluripotent activity, such as interalpha inhibitor proteins and estrogen-receptor ligands, are also being investigated.

The in vitro adsorption of cytokines by polymer-pyrolysed carbon

This study investigated a range of phenol-formaldehyde-aniline-based pyrolysed carbon matrices and their component materials, for their ability to adsorb a range of inflammatory cytokines crucial to the progression of sepsis. The efficiency of adsorption of the target molecules from human plasma was assessed and compared to that of Adsorba 300C, a commercially available cellulose-coated activated charcoal. Results indicate that a number of the primary carbon/resin materials demonstrate efficient adsorption of the cytokines studied here (TNF, IL-6 and IL-8), comparable to other adsorbents under clinical investigation. Our findings also illustrate that these adsorbent capabilities are retained when the primary particles are combined to form a pyrolysed carbon matrix. This capability will enable the engineering of the carbon matrix porosity allowing a blend of carbonised particle combinations to be tailored for maximum adsorption of inflammatory cytokines. The present findings support further investigation of this carbon material as a combined carbon-based filtration/adsorbent device for direct blood purification.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

Highly effective reduction of C-reactive protein in patients with coronary heart disease by extracorporeal low density lipoprotein apheresis

An association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and coronary heart disease (CHD) has been shown. CRP is present in atherosclerotic lesions, and there is increasing evidence that it may contribute to inflammation. Reduction of CRP concentrations otherwise considered normal may thus be of therapeutic value. Heparin-induced extracorporeal low density lipoprotein precipitation (HELP) is an established apheresis procedure to treat CHD patients with hypercholesterolemia. CRP concentrations were determined pre- and post-apheresis in 13 hypercholesterolemic CHD patients, during a total of 31 treatment procedures as well as in the interval between two treatments in six-patients using a high-sensitivity CRP assay. In addition, the effect of the HELP precipitation buffer on serum CRP concentrations was investigated in vitro. HELP treatment reduced CRP concentrations on average by 65%. The presence of CRP in the LDL precipitate of a patient was also confirmed by Western-blot analysis. In vitro experiments with serum samples revealed that CRP was partly co-precipitated with LDL. Greater fluctuation was observed in the post-apheresis concentrations of CRP compared with LDL. These results show that CRP can be very effectively lowered in CHD patients through the HELP system. This may further explain the stabilization and reduction of atherosclerotic plaques in hypercholesterolemic patients previously demonstrated with this treatment procedure.

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: current status

Heparin-coated circuits have been subjected to vigorous testing, both experimentally and clinically, for the past decade. When the functions of heparin are preserved on the surface, the heparinized surface plays multiple roles in attenuating the systemic inflammatory response. These include the ability to attenuate contact activation, coagulation activation, complement activation and, directly or indirectly, platelet and leukocyte activation. The heparinized surface also renders the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits hydrophilic and protein resistant and augments lipoprotein binding. The multifunctional nature of the heparinized surface contributes to the overall biocompatibility of the surface. Clinically, heparin-coated circuits become most effective in reducing systemic inflammatory response and in improving morbidity, mortality, and other patient outcome related parameters when material-independent blood activation is controlled or minimized through a global biocompatibility strategy. Techniques involved in the global biocompatibility strategy are readily available and are being effectively and safely practiced at several centers. With the global biocompatibility strategy, outstanding and reproducible results have been routinely achieved with conventional CPB techniques. Alternative revascularization procedures should equal or surpass conventional CPB, using best clinically proven strategies with respect to patient outcome and long-term graft patency.

Current topics on cytokine removal technologies

It has been widely accepted that cytokines play important roles in the development of organ failure in various pathophysiological conditions of critically ill patients. Various new technologies, including continuous renal replacement therapy, have been developed for the removal of causative humoral mediators in sepsis or other critical conditions. Nonselective blood purification technologies, such as hemofiltration and plasma exchange, are applied in cytokine removal technology. However, the more selective blood purification technologies, such as adsorption, and the combination of those technologies, should be considered in future applications. Only through a prospective randomized controlled study can it be elucidated whether or not these technologies have efficacy in the treatment of sepsis and critically ill patients with hypercytokinemia. We should join and discuss the design of future clinical trials with a standardized strategy for the evaluation of the technologies.

Apheresis as Therapy for Patients with Severe Sepsis and Multiorgan Dysfunction Syndrome

Progressive multiorgan dysfunction syndrome may occur in the course of sepsis and septic shock as well as after various intoxications, pancreatitis, crush injuries, and major surgery. Despite conventional intensive care therapies, the prognosis in these patients is still poor. Apheresis, which uses more selective adsorption techniques, can lower the extent of toxins and cytokines in blood. This is achieved in clinical practice by, e.g., using polymyxin B as adsorbent. Although significantly lowered, the mortality is still about 50% with this technique. By unselective plasma exchange, the mortality is reduced down to 20 to 40%. A controlled and randomized study has shown a significant benefit. The centrifugation technique may be favorable over plasma filtration. Not only removal but also replacement with plasma seems important. In the future, probably selective techniques will be used in the early stages of sepsis while unselective plasma exchange may be useful in a disseminated situation.

Is there a future for adsorption techniques in sepsis?

During sepsis toxins released from, e.g., bacteria induce reactions of various cascade systems that may cause progression of the patient into septic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and subsequent death. The use of conventional treatments using antibiotics, fluid substitution, inotropic drugs, respiration aid and dialysis is not enough to reverse the serious prognosis. The addition of various other drugs such as antibodies against various cytokines and cytokine receptors, pentoxiphylline, immunoglobulins or high doses of steroids is usually without benefit for the prognosis of the patient. Another possibility to reduce the extent of toxins and other harmful compounds in the circulation is the use of apheresis (removal by technical devices). This can be done either in a nonselective way (plasma exchange, plasmapheresis) or more selectively using various adsorbers such as polymyxin B. The survival in studies varies between 50 and 80%. Besides the use of nonselective apheresis, the development of various selective adsorption techniques may be one approach to improve survival of these severely ill patients.

Cytokines and endotoxin removal by sorbents and its application in push-pull sorbent-based pheresis: the BioLogic-DTPF System

The BioLogic-DTPF System (DTPF) combines the Biologic-DT hemodiabsorption system (DT) in series with the Biologic PF push-pull pheresis system (PF) in which PF membranes separate plasma for direct contact between plasma proteins and the sorbents. Preliminary studies conducted in bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution and in bovine plasma allowed charcoal and silica to be evaluated as adsorbents for the PF module. Equilibrium binding experiments in BSA showed a high capacity of cytokine (IL-1 beta, TNF alpha) binding by powdered charcoal, 70-90 ng/g. Kinetic binding studies in bovine plasma revealed relatively quick adsorption of IL-1 beta and IL-6 by charcoal with the capacity range of 1.2-2.0 ng/g for tested cytokines (IL-1 beta and TNF alpha). Further laboratory studies with plasma have shown that powdered silica has an even greater binding capacity, up to 13 ng/g for TNF alpha depending upon particle size, and more rapid binding for all tested cytokines than powdered charcoal. Cholestyramine is a more efficient sorbent for removal of endotoxin than either charcoal or silica. In vitro tests using whole blood have demonstrated that the DTPF, with powdered charcoal as the sorbent, clears cytokines (TNF alpha, IL-1 beta, and IL-6) at 12.6-23.4 ml/min, bilirubin at 17.8-34.7 ml/min, and creatinine at 53.6-82.6 ml/min. The removal of some cytokines during the first clinical trial is also discussed.

Apheresis of plasma compounds as a therapeutic principle in severe sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome

During sepsis there is an increase in the plasma content of several compounds, e.g., bacterial toxins, cytokines, cell debris, free hemoglobin and myoglobin. In blood, these compounds activate various cascade systems, which in large amounts or in more vulnerable patients lead to a disseminated intra-vascular coagulopathy (DIC) with multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death, despite conventional intensive care unit therapy. Therapeutic attempts to reverse these conditions have so far been of limited benefit. These effects have mainly been focused on lowering the blood concentration of single substances such as tumor necrosis factor. By the use of low-and high-flux hemodialysis filters, usually only small amounts of these substances are removed. By the use of plasmapheresis or plasma exchange, the extent of removal is considerably increased. The efficacy varies between the techniques (centrifugation vs. filtration or adsorption) and has also different influences on e.g. the complement system. This report describes these techniques and the therapeutical possibilities given by them. In small trials, blood or plasma exchange has been used as rescue therapy in critically ill patients with a progressive MODS and DIC. A survival of about 80% of the patients has been reported in these studies and the use of combined therapy will be discussed. Controlled trials are required in this field.