The efficacy of divalproex sodium in the prophylactic treatment of children with migraine

Efficacy of IV Valproic Acid and Oral Valproic Acid Tapers for the Treatment of Pediatric Headaches in the Emergency Department

Background and Objectives

Pediatric headaches, including migraine, are a common reason for emergency department (ED) presentation. IV valproic acid (VPA) followed by oral VPA tapers are often used to abort pediatric headache and reduce recurrence, though limited data exist regarding this approach. This study evaluated the effectiveness of IV VPA and oral VPA tapers for the treatment of acute pediatric headaches in the ED in preventing return encounters.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 5-21 years presenting to a tertiary-care pediatric ED from 2010 to 2016 who received IV VPA for headache or migraine. Primary outcomes were ED disposition, percent pain reduction (initial vs 2-hour patient-reported pain score [10-point scale]), and return for acute headache treatment within 1 month.

Results

A total of 486 ED encounters were included with a median patient age of 15 years; most of them were females (76%, 369/486). Of available pain scores within 2 hours of IV VPA administration, 41% (173/425) had ≥50% pain reduction. Fifty-two percent (254/486) were discharged without additional treatment, 14% (69/486) were discharged after additional treatment, and 33% (163/486) were admitted to the hospital. Initial pain score, number of preceding home treatments, and number of preceding ED treatments were not associated with ED disposition. Oral VPA tapers were prescribed in 39% (94/253) of encounters when the patient was discharged after IV VPA. Oral VPA tapers produced a transient decrease in recurrence at 72 hours, which was no longer present at 1 week nor 1 month. There was no difference in the time to recurrence or total number of return visits within 1 month.

Discussion

IV VPA was efficacious in treating pediatric headaches evaluated in the ED, with nearly two-thirds of patients discharged home after administration. Oral VPA tapers did not reduce total headache recurrence nor time to recurrence. Given the limited benefit of oral VPA tapers, this practice should be re-examined.

Classification of Evidence

This study provides Class IV evidence that for children with headache seen in the ED, IV VPA reduces head pain and Class III evidence that following this with an oral VPA taper is of no benefit.

Analytical method validation for related substances in sodium valproate oral solution by gas chromatography

Background

Sodium Valproate is the sodium salt of valproic acid (VPA). Valproic acid is mainly used for the treatment of epilepsy. The specific aim of the study is to develop and validate an optimized method for the determination of six related substances such as N,N-dimethyl valpronamide, valeric acid, 2-methyl valeric acid, 2-ethyl valeric acid, 2-isopropyl valeric acid and 2-n-butyl valeric acid in Sodium Valproate Oral Solution by Gas Chromatography. Chromatographic separations of these six related substances were achieved on DB-FFAP fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.53 mm) bonded with a 0.5-µm layer of macrogol 20,000 2-nitroterephthalate materials used as stationary phase. The six related impurities were extracted using heptane and monitored by Gas Chromatography coupled with flame ionization detector. The performance of the developed method was assessed by evaluating system suitability, method precision, specificity, linearity and range, ruggedness, accuracy, robustness.

Results

The correlation coefficient was within the acceptance criteria in the range of 0.9998. The evaluated concentrations for Sodium Valproate were in the ranges of 5.05–25.27 ppm. The average recovery values were in the range of 92.4–100.4%. Solution Stability experiments were performed to evaluate the degradation behavior of SVS.

Conclusion

A novel, precise and sensitive GC method was developed, validated and optimized for the determination of six related substances in sodium Valproate oral solution. The results obtained from the validation experiments demonstrated that the method is accurate, precise, linear, specific, sensitive and robust. Hence, the proposed method can be an alternative method, for the determination of related substances in sodium valproate oral solution drug substance.

Effectiveness of Emergency Department Treatment of Pediatric Headache and Relation to Rebound Headache

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of headache relief obtained in the pediatric emergency department (PED) with abortive treatment and unscheduled return visits to the PED for a recurrent or persistent headache within 72 hours.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study with 369 patients, all younger than 18 years, who presented to the PED with a primary complaint of either a headache or migraine. Patient and visit details were collected from the medical chart, along with presenting and discharge pain score. Percent pain reduction at discharge was determined through the following calculation: (Presenting Pain Score - Discharge Pain Score)/Presenting Pain Score. Associations were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

No significant association was found between the percent pain reduction and return to the PED (P = 0.49). Mean presenting pain score at the index visit was statistically higher for those who ended up returning to the PED versus those who did not (8.1 vs 7.4; P = 0.02). A trend toward increase in return visits was seen among patients who had a headache duration greater than 3 days (odds ratio, 1.99) and patients who experienced less than 50% pain reduction in the PED (odds ratio, 1.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete resolution in the PED may not be necessary, given the lack of association between the degree of pain relief and revisit rates. Perhaps, the goal should be to achieve at least 50% pain reduction before discharge.

Cinnarizine and sodium valproate as the preventive agents of pediatric migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Few migraine preventive agents have been assessed in a pediatric population. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cinnarizine and sodium valproate for migraine prophylaxis in children and adolescents.

METHODS

We carried out a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in the Children's Medical Center and Sina hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eligible participants were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio via interactive web response system to receive either cinnarizine, sodium valproate, or placebo. The primary endpoints were the mean change in frequency and intensity of migraine attacks from baseline to the last 4 weeks of trial. The secondary endpoint was the efficacy of each drug in the prevention of migraine. The drug was considered effective if it decreased migraine frequency by more than 50% in the double-blind phase compared with the baseline. Safety endpoint was adverse effects that were reported by children or their parents.

RESULTS

A total of 158 children participated. The frequency of migraine attacks significantly reduced compared to baseline in cinnarizine (difference: -8.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): -9.3 to -6.6), sodium valproate (difference: -8.3; 95% confidence interval: -9.3 to -7.2), and placebo (difference: -4.4; 95% confidence interval: -5.4 to -3.4) arms. The decrease was statistically greater in cinnarizine (difference: -3.6; 95% confidence interval: -5.5 to -1.6) and sodium valproate (difference: -3.9; 95% confidence interval: -5.8 to -1.9) arms, compared to placebo group. Children in all groups had significant reduction in intensity of episodes compared to baseline (cinnarizine: -4.6; 95% confidence interval: -5.2 to -4.0; sodium valproate: -4.0; 95% confidence interval: -4.8 to -3.3; placebo: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -3.4 to -1.8). The decrease was statistically greater in cinnarizine (difference: -2.0; 95% confidence interval: -3.2 to -0.8) and sodium valproate (difference: -1.5; 95% confidence interval: -2.7 to -0.3) arms, compared to the placebo group. Seventy-one percent of individuals in the cinnarizine group, 66% of cases in the sodium valproate group, and 42% of people in the placebo arm reported more than 50% reduction in episodes at the end of the trial. The odds ratio for >50% responder rate was 3.5 (98.3% confidence interval: 1.3 to 9.3) for cinnarizine versus placebo and 2.7 (98.3% confidence interval: 1.0 to 6.9) for sodium valproate versus placebo. Nine individuals reported adverse effects (three in cinnarizine, five in sodium valproate, and one in the placebo group) and one case in the sodium valproate group discontinued the therapy due to severe sedation.

CONCLUSION

Cinnarizine and sodium valproate could be useful in migraine prophylaxis in children and adolescents. Trial registration: IRCT201206306907N4.

Pediatric Migraine: An Update

This article outlines key features of diagnosis and treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. It emphasizes techniques that can be used by clinicians to optimize history taking in this population, as well as recognition of episodic conditions that may be associated with migraine and present in childhood. Acute treatment strategies include use of over-the-counter analgesics and triptan medications that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in children and adolescents. Preventive treatment approach includes lifestyle modifications, behavioral strategies, and consideration of preventive medications with the lowest side effect profiles.

Plasma Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide: A Potential Biomarker for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Responses in Pediatric Migraine

Background: Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in the migraine pathophysiology. This study aimed to investigate its role in predicting diagnosis and outcome of pharmacotherapy in pediatric migraine.

Methods: We prospectively recruited 120 subjects, who never took migraine-preventive agents in a pediatric clinic, including 68 patients with migraine, 30 with non-migraine headache (NM), and 22 non-headache (NH) age-matched controls. Short-term therapeutic response was measured for at least 2 weeks after the start of therapy. Responders were defined with >50% headache reduction. Plasma CGRP concentrations were measured by ELISA.

Results: In the migraine group, more patients required acute therapy, as compared to the NM group (62/68, 91% vs. 5/30, 15%, p = 0.001). The mean plasma CGRP level in migraineurs either during (291 ± 60 pg/ml) or between (240 ± 48) attacks was higher than in NM patients (51 ± 5 pg/ml, p = 0.006 and 0.018, respectively) and NH controls (53 ± 6 pg/ml, p = 0.016 and 0.045, respectively). Forty-seven patients (69%) needed preventive treatments and had higher plasma CGRP levels (364 ± 62 pg/ml, n = 47) than those not (183 ± 54 pg/ml, n = 21) (p = 0.031). Topiramate responders had higher plasma CGRP levels than non-responders (437 ± 131 pg/ml, n = 14 vs. 67 ± 19 pg/ml, n = 6, p = 0.021). Survival curves of plasma CGRP levels also showed those with higher CGRP levels responded better to topiramate. Differences were not found in the other preventives.

Conclusion: The plasma CGRP level can differentiate migraine from non-migraine headache. It may also serve as a reference for the therapeutic strategy since it is higher in patients requiring migraine prevention and responsive to short-term topiramate treatment. These results are clinically significant, especially for the young children who cannot clearly describe their headache symptoms and may provide new insights into the clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric migraine.

Reliable GC Method for Related Substances in Divalproex Sodium Drug

A specific GC method has been developed, optimized and validated for the determination of seven related substances namely N,N-dimethyl valpronamide, valeric acid, 2-methyl valeric acid, 2-ethyl valeric acid, 2-isopropyl valeric acid, 2-n-butyl valeric acid and 2-propyl-2-pentenoic acid in divalproex sodium (DPS) drug substance. Chromatographic separations of these seven impurities were achieved on DB-FFAP column (30 m × 0.53 mm, 1.0 μm), which consists nitroterephthalic acid modified polyethylene glycol material as stationary phase. DPS is a coordination complex of the sodium valproate and valproic acid (VPA). Nonanoic acid is used as internal standard. All the seven related substances, VPA and nonanoic acid were extracted into dichloromethane and monitored by GC with flame ionization detector. The performance of the developed method was assessed by evaluating specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy and robustness. Forced degradation experiments were conducted to evaluate the degradation behavior of DPS. The established limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) values for the related substances were in the ranges of 4-5 and 12-15 μg mL-1, respectively. Further, for VPA, LOD and LOQ values were 4 and 12 μg mL-1, respectively. The correction factors of these related substances with respect to VPA and lie between 0.92 and 1.44. The average recoveries were in the range of 92.4-108.4%.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Pain

Adolescents and children are frequently affected by chronic pain conditions that can lead to disability and distress. The best approach to evaluation and treatment of these conditions involves use of the biopsychosocial model, which includes use of medication management. Chronic pain conditions are treated pharmacologically with a number of different medication classes via several routes of administration as drug delivery systems have progressed. These include anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, antiepileptic medicines, antidepressants, opioids, and local anesthetics. Most are prescribed without regulatory body approval to treat specific pain syndromes as data to support their use are sparse. Medical decision making is guided by experience, empiric evidence, extrapolation from adult studies, and matching medication classes with the theorized mechanism of the pain condition. It is not recommended that nonpain practitioners prescribe opioid medications for treatment of chronic pain conditions, and pain management practitioners should seek to minimize their use. The appropriate and commonly used medications for pain conditions are presented in this narrative review.

Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine in Children. Part 2. A Systematic Review of Pharmacological Trials∗

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of pharmacological prophylactic treatments of migraine in children. Databases were searched from inception to June 2004 and references were checked. We selected controlled trials on the effects of pharmacological prophylactic treatments in children with migraine. We assessed trial quality using the Delphi list and extracted data. Analyses were carried out according to type of intervention. A total of 20 trials were included. Headache improvement was significantly higher for flunarizine compared with placebo (relative risk 4.00, 95% confidence interval 1.60, 9.97). There is conflicting evidence for the use of propranolol. Nimodipine, clonidine, L-5HTP, trazodone and papaverine showed no effect when compared with placebo. All medications were well tolerated and adverse events showed no significant differences. Flunarizine may be effective as prophylactic treatment for migraine in children. Because of the small number of studies and the methodological shortcomings, conclusions regarding effectiveness have to be drawn with caution.

Migraine management in children

Migraine management in children relies on understanding the difference between adult and childhood migraine, being able to identify childhood migraine variants and knowledge of both the pediatric and adult literature regarding treatment.

Pharmacological treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in pediatric patients

Chronic pain in children and young adults occurs frequently and contributes to early disability as well as personal and familial distress. A biopsychosocial approach to evaluation and treatment is recommended. Within this approach, there is a role for pharmacologic intervention. A variety of medications are used for chronic pain conditions in pediatric patients. Medication classes include anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, opioids, local anesthetics, and anti-inflammatory drugs. Data is sparse, and most medications are used without condition-specific approval by national regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration in the US and the European Medicines Agency. In the absence of evidence on which to base practice, optimal drug therapy decisions rest on understanding proposed mechanisms of pain conditions, extrapolation from adult data-when such exists, and empirical and experiential knowledge. Drug delivery systems have evolved, and practitioners have to decide amongst not only medication classes, but also routes of delivery. Opioids are not recommended for use by non-pain specialists for the treatment of pediatric chronic pain, and even then the issues are more complex than can be addressed here. This article reviews the major medications used for pediatric chronic pain conditions.

Pediatric headache: where have we been and where do we need to be

In this article, we hope to summarize current understanding of pediatric headache. We discuss epidemiology, genetics, classification, diagnosis, outpatient, emergency and inpatient treatment options, prevention strategies, and behavioral approaches. For each section, we end with a series of questions for future research and consideration.

Pediatric migraine: new diagnostic strategies and treatment options

Migraine headaches are seen commonly by physicians caring for children and adolescents. The prevalence in the pediatric population ranges from 3.2 to 10.6%. With the advent of new inclusive diagnostic criteria, reproducibility of definitive diagnosis in children and adolescents should improve. Although advances with clinical drug trials have yielded new, approved therapies in adults, information remains inconclusive in the pediatric population. Further clinical studies are warranted to develop consensus on treatment paradigms for clinicians to utilize in children and adolescents with migraine.

Pharmacologic treatment of pediatric headaches: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic headache treatment in children and adolescents. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials, and bibliography of retrieved articles through August 11, 2012. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials of headache treatment among children and adolescents (<18 years old). INTERVENTION Any placebo-controlled trial or comparisons between 2 or more active medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Number of headaches per month. RESULTS Among 21 included trials, there were 13 placebo-controlled and 10 active comparator trials (2 also included placebo). Twenty trials focused on episodic migraines and 1 on chronic daily headaches. Drugs more effective than placebo for episodic migraines (<15 headaches per month) included topiramate (difference in headaches per month, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.24) and trazodone (-0.60; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.11). Ineffective drugs included clonidine, flunarizine, pizotifen, propranolol, and valproate. A single trial of fluoxetine for chronic daily headaches found it ineffective. Patients given placebo experienced a significant (P = .03) decline in headaches, from 5.6 (95% CI, 4.52-6.77; Q = 8.14 [Cochran Q is a measure of the heterogeneity of the included studies]) to 2.9 headaches per month (95% CI, 1.66-4.08; Q = 4.72). Among the 10 active comparator trials, flunarizine was more effective than piracetam (difference in headaches per month, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.93 to -0.47) but no better than aspirin, dihydroergotamine, or propranolol. Propranolol was compared with valproate as well as behavioral treatment, and 2 studies compared different doses of topiramate; none of these trials showed significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Topiramate and trazodone have limited evidence supporting efficacy for episodic migraines. Placebo was effective in reducing headaches. Other commonly used drugs have no evidence supporting their use in children and adolescents. More research is needed.

The treatment of migraine headaches in children and adolescents

Effective management of migraine headache in children and adolescents requires a balanced approach with an individually tailored regimen targeted to treat an acute attack at its onset, blended with bio-behavioral measures, and, in about 1/3 of patients, daily preventive medicines. The key first step is to assess the disability imposed by the recurrent headache pattern, the headache "burden." Once the burden is established decisions can be made toward selecting the most appropriate course of action. All patients will benefit from some basic bio-behavioral suggestions such as regular sleep, exercise, and eating schedule, moderation of caffeine, and identification of triggers. In addition, all patients should have a readily available analgesic to be used at the onset of a migraine attack. A subset of migraineurs will have sufficient headache burden to necessitate use of daily preventative medications. Unfortunately, there is limited controlled data to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based guideline, however, the most rigorously studied agents for acute treatment are ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and "triptan" nasal spray forms of sumatriptan and zolmitriptan; all of these have shown safety and efficacy in controlled trials. For preventive treatment, flunarizine, not available in the U.S., is the only agent that has demonstrated efficacy in placebo controlled trials, but encouraging data is emerging regarding the use of several antiepileptic agents such as topiramate, disodium valproate, and levetiracetam, as well as the antihistamine cyproheptadine and the antidepressant amitriptyline.

Treating pediatric migraine: an expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Headaches are common in children and adolescents and migraine affects almost 8% of this population. As revisions are made to the ICHD-II criteria to include additional characteristics of pediatric migraine, the diagnosis of migraine is expected to increase. Therefore, it is important to understand and apply successful treatment in acute migraine. Patients and families should be educated about the options for migraine treatment that includes both pharmacologic and conservative behavioral techniques in managing headaches.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the studies that have been performed in pediatric patients, in addition to exploring the treatment options commonly used in pediatrics and adolescents for migraine and their rationale for use.

EXPERT OPINION

For the acute treatment of migraine, we recommend the use of ibuprofen or acetaminophen for mild, moderate or severe headache. For moderate to severe headache, or for headaches that fail to respond to over-the-counter medications, we recommend the use of a triptan or combination NSAID/triptan therapy. For preventative treament of migraine, cyproheptadine should be reserved for younger children unable to swallow tablets while amitriptyline is preferred due to its once daily dosing and minimal side effects. Topiramate and divalproate are considerable options depending on patient co-morbid profile and preference.

Efficacy and safety of cinnarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches in children: an open, randomized comparative trial with propranolol

Migraine headaches are common in children. Early diagnosis and appropriate interventions are mandatory to prevent decades of suffering and diminished quality of life. There is need for data regarding the efficacy and safety of prophylactic agents in children with migraine; therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of cinnarizine with that of a well-known prophylactic agent (propranolol) in the prophylaxis of pediatric migraine headache. A total of 120 patients aged between 6 and 17 years were recruited and 113 patients succeeded in completing all phases of the trial. Of them, 57 patients were given cinnarizine, and propranolol was administered in 56 patients. Reduction in headache frequency was the main response to treatment. Cinnarizine reduced the baseline headache frequency by more than 50% in 74.6% of patients and the mean headache frequency per month was reduced from 11.851 ± 0.739 (mean ± SEM) to 3.358 ± 0.739 (mean ± SEM) attacks per month (P < 0.001). In the propranolol group, more than 50% reduction of the baseline headache frequency was seen in 72.5% of patients and the mean headache frequency per month was reduced from 10.264 ± 0.830 (mean ± SEM) to 2.774 ± 0.830 (mean ± SEM) attacks per month (P < 0.001). No significant difference was seen in 50% reduction of the baseline headache frequency between treatment groups (P = 0.358). No significant adverse effects were reported. In this open study, cinnarizine appeared thus as effective as propranolol and safe for the prophylaxis of migraine in children, but this remains to be confirmed in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Chronic daily headache in the pediatric population

Very limited long-term follow-up data exist for the population of children and adolescents with chronic daily headache (CDH). One abstracted report discusses short-term follow-up on 24 adolescents (peak age 13 years) with CDH; in a 6-month follow-up, more than 50% experienced a reduction of 75% or more in headache frequency, and one third showed an improvement of greater than 90% in headache frequency. A wide variety of preventive agents were used, but amitriptyline and topiramate provided the largest percentage of successful outcomes. With an improving classification scheme, we have the possibility of using multicenter studies to elucidate whether the clinical patterns seen by experienced observers translate into rational differentiation of treatment approaches. If the entities of CDH are, indeed, different, then therapeutic, prophylactic, and behavioral trials could guide us in offering a more evidence-based approach to the treatment of this fascinating, yet sometimes debilitating condition.

Intravenous sodium valproate aborts migraine headaches rapidly

OBJECTIVES

This preliminary study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous sodium valproate in managing severe migraine headache.

DESIGN/METHODS

In a preliminary prospective open-label study, we treated patients with severe migraine headache using intravenous sodium valproate, after obtaining written informed consent. Thirty-six patients, hospitalized with acute established migraine, were infused with sodium valproate. The diagnosis of migraine was based on the International Headache Society classification criteria. Severity of headache was reported on 10-point visual analog. Disability was assessed on a five-point scale. Primary and secondary endpoints were measured as sustained pain relief and symptoms improvement at 2 h, respectively.

RESULTS

The study participants had a mean±SD age of 35.7±9.3 years. The loading dose of sodium valproate was 900-1200 mg, and the average time to best response for headache severity was 50 min. A reduction in pain from severe or moderate to mild or no pain in 60 min was reported in 75% of patients [OR=7.187 (95% confidence intervals: 1.32-38.95)]. After treatment with sodium valproate, headache severity was significantly decreased (P<0.0001). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous Sodium Valproate (iVPA) seems to be safe and rapidly effective for intractable migraine attack. Randomized, double-blinded, controlled studies are warranted.

Overview of diagnosis and management of paediatric headache. Part II: therapeutic management

A thorough evaluation of headache in children and adolescents is necessary to make the correct diagnosis and initiate treatment. In part 1 of this article (Özge et al. in J Headache Pain, 2010), we reviewed the diagnosis of headache in children and adolescents. In the present part, we will discuss therapeutic management of primary headaches. An appropriate management requires an individually tailored strategy giving due consideration to both non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures. Non-pharmacological treatments include relaxation training, biofeedback training, cognitive-behavioural therapy, different psychotherapeutic approaches or combinations of these treatments. The data supporting the effectiveness of these therapies are less clear-cut in children than in adults, but that is also true for the data supporting medical treatment. Management of migraine and TTH should include strategies relating to daily living activities, family relationships, school, friends and leisure time activities. In the pharmacological treatment age and gender of children, headache diagnosis, comorbidities and side effects of medication must be considered. The goal of symptomatic treatment should be a quick response with return to normal activity and without relapse. The drug should be taken as early as possible and in the appropriate dosage. Supplementary measures such as rest in a quiet, darkened room is recommended. Pharmaco-prophylaxis is only indicated if lifestyle modification and non-pharmacological prophylaxis alone are not effective. Although many prophylactic medications have been tried in paediatric migraine, there are only a few medications that have been studied in controlled trials. Multidisciplinary treatment is an effective strategy for children and adolescents with improvement of multiple outcome variants including frequency and severity of headache and school days missed because of headache. As a growing problem both children and families should be informed about medication overuse and the children's drug-taking should be checked.

A randomized trial of propranolol versus sodium valproate for the prophylaxis of migraine in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Migraine is the most common of the paroxysmal disorders to affect the brain in the pediatric population. Both propranolol and sodium valproate (valproic acid) have been advocated as prophylactic agents for childhood migraine.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of propranolol and sodium valproate in the prevention of migraine in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Sixty-three children (aged 5-15 years) with migraine without aura, as defined by the 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, were included in this prospective, double-blind clinical trial and were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n = 32 patients) received propranolol 3 mg/kg/day and group B (n = 31 patients) received sodium valproate 30 mg/kg/day, with at least 6 months of follow up. The propranolol dosage was adjusted to 2 mg/kg/day and the sodium valproate dosage to 15 mg/kg/day, after the first follow-up visit. Participants were evaluated by using a detailed questionnaire that asked about the features of headaches and general health characteristics. The study endpoints were successful treatment for a 4- to 6-month period; 3 months of a persistent unsuccessful or incomplete response to treatment; intolerable side effects; and/or patient non-adherence. All data were analyzed longitudinally by comparing baseline data with data from each follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients completed the full headache prophylaxis period. The baseline headache frequency was reduced by more than 50% in 83% of propranolol recipients and in 63% of sodium valproate recipients (statistically not significant); the overall reduction of baseline headache frequency per month was better in group A (p = 0.044). The mean headache frequency per month was reduced from 13.86 +/- 2.11 to 4.23 +/- 3.24 in group A, and from 13.23 +/- 2.43 to 5.83 +/- 4.04 in group B; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The mean headache duration per week was decreased from 9.9 +/- 7.4 hours to 3.2 +/- 5.9 hours in group A, and from 9.1 +/- 6.9 hours to 3.7 +/- 5.0 hours in group B; although there was no statistically significant difference between propranolol and sodium valproate, headache duration was markedly improved with each drug (p < 0.002). Reduction of headache severity by at least one grade was seen in 64% of patients in group A and in 56% in group B, and complete cessation of headache attacks occurred in 14% of patients in group A and 10% in group B (not significant). Minor side effects appeared to be fairly well tolerated by patients in both groups, with no significant difference in side effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study supports the efficacy of propranolol and sodium valproate as prophylaxis for pediatric migraine without aura, based on IHS criteria. There were no significant differences between these two drugs in all evaluated parameters except for the mean headache frequency per month, which was lower with propranolol than with sodium valproate.

Sociodemographic differences in diagnosis and treatment of pediatric headache

The authors investigated the sociodemographic differences in receiving a headache diagnosis for pediatric health care visits using 2 nationally representative databases--the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. For those visits involving a headache diagnosis, the authors explored 2 possible disparities in care--being diagnosed by a neurologist and being prescribed an evidence-based medication. A headache diagnosis was less common during visits for private insurance patients versus Medicaid patients. In addition, while a headache diagnosis was equally likely for visits by Caucasian American children versus African American children and children of other races, visits for the latter 2 groups were less likely to involve a headache diagnosis from a neurologist. Finally, only 37% of the headache visits involved a prescription of an evidence-based medication. The authors conclude that some sociodemographic disparities exist in pediatric headache care across the United States.

Headache in children

Headache is an extremely frequent symptom in childhood and adolescence, and a common reason for neurological consultation. The prevalence of primary headaches (about 85% in tertiary centers) ranges from 10% to 20% in schoolchildren, and increases with increasing age. No sex difference is apparent until age 11. Female preponderance begins about age 12; during adolescence the female-to-male ratio is about 2:1. A child is not a "little adult" and many developmental and individual factors affect headaches, pertaining to the clinical expression, diagnosis, and therapy of the primary headache. According to this view, several points have to be clarified, beginning by considering the child as a whole as regards his or her development, taking into account neurobiological and psychological maturational processes, familial, social, and environmental factors, and avoiding an adult-focused approach to the disease. It is necessary to find key points in the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of headache in childhood and adolescence.

Role of antiepileptic drugs as preventive agents for migraine

Migraine is a common neurological disease affecting about 12% of the population in Western Europe and North America, and causing a considerable burden both to migraineurs and to society. Severe, frequent and disabling migraine attacks, as well as those poorly responsive to acute care medication, require preventive treatment, which is often under-utilized. Antiepileptic drugs are used in the prevention of migraine. We performed a literature search of PubMed through June 2008 for controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs in the prevention of migraine. The search identified 70 papers for a full-text review. The majority of these papers referred to valproate and topiramate, and showed that these drugs are effective and well tolerated in migraine prevention and are suitable for first-line clinical use. On the other hand, acetazolamide, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and vigabatrin have been shown to be not effective and gabapentin requires further evaluation. For the rest of the antiepileptic drugs, no data from controlled trials are available.

Divalproex extended-release in adolescent migraine prophylaxis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 3 different doses of divalproex sodium extended-release vs placebo in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches in adolescents.

BACKGROUND

Divalproex sodium has been approved for migraine prophylaxis in adults, and previous uncontrolled data suggest divalproex sodium may be effective in preventing migraine in children and adolescents with acceptable tolerability.

METHODS

This was a 12-week, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study in approximately 300 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with migraine headaches. At the end of the baseline phase, subjects still meeting study criteria were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive divalproex sodium extended-release 250 mg, 500 mg, or 1000 mg once daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was reduction from baseline in 4-week migraine headache rate for each active treatment group vs placebo. Standard safety assessments were conducted and testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels were collected for postmenarchal females.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant treatment difference between any divalproex sodium extended-release dose group and placebo for the primary efficacy variable, reduction from baseline in 4-week migraine headache rate. There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between any active treatment group and placebo. A notable dose-related decrease in platelets was observed, and individuals in all 4 treatment groups had increases in ammonia levels; treatment differences in other laboratory variables were generally small. Among postmenarchal female subjects who were not taking hormonal contraceptives or other steroids, there was no statistically significant change in testosterone levels, but a statistically significant dose-related increase in sex hormone-binding globulin was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, divalproex sodium extended-release did not differentiate from placebo in the prophylactic treatment of migraine headaches but was generally well-tolerated in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years.

Pediatric migraine

Migraine is the most common cause of acute recurrent headaches in children. The pathophysiological concepts have evolved from a purely vascular etiology to a neuroinflammatory process. Clinical evaluation is the mainstay of diagnosis and should also include family history. Investigations help to rule out secondary causes. The role of new drugs in treatment of migraine is discussed and trials are quoted from literature. Indications for starting prophylaxis should be evaluated based on frequency of attacks and influence on quality of life. For management of acute attacks of migraine both acetaminophen and ibuprofen are recommended for use in children. Many drugs like antiepileptic drugs (AED), calcium channel blockers, and antidepressants have been used for prophylaxis of migraine in children. The data for use of newer drugs for migraine in children is limited, though AEDs are emerging a popular choice. Biofeedback and other nonmedicinal therapies are being used with promising results.

Weight change associated with the use of migraine-preventive medications

BACKGROUND

Medications administered long term, such as those used for migraine prophylaxis, are often associated with weight change as a side effect. Such effects may compromise general health status, exacerbate coexisting medical conditions, and affect medication adherence. Weight gain should be of particular concern in patients with migraine, as there is evidence that overweight and obese patients with migraine are at risk for an increased frequency and severity of migraine attacks.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews weight-change data from recent clinical studies of migraine-preventive medications in children, adolescents, and adults with migraine.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for English-language articles published between January 1970 and November 2007. Among the search terms were migraine prevention, migraine prophylaxis, migraine treatment, antidepressant drug, beta-adrenergic-receptor blockers, antiepileptic drug, anticonvulsant drug, weight gain, and weight loss. Studies that reported weight-change data (gain, loss, or neutral) were included. When available, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were selected for review. Open-label, retrospective or prospective trials may also have been included.

RESULTS

Most of the migraine-preventive medications classified by the United States Headache Consortium as group 1 based on the high level of evidence for their efficacy--for instance, amitriptyline, propranolol, and divalproex sodium-have been associated with varying degrees of weight gain. The exceptions are timolol, which is weight neutral, and topiramate, which is associated with weight loss. Among the drugs that have been associated with weight gain, a higher incidence of weight gain was observed with amitriptyline and divalproex sodium than with propranolol.

CONCLUSION

Weight-change effects require careful consideration when selecting migraine-preventive medications, and weight should be monitored carefully over the course of any migraine treatment plan.

Anticonvulsant drugs for pediatric migraine prevention: an evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

The use of anticonvulsant drugs for the prevention of migraine in children and adolescents has been supported in the past.

AIMS

To evaluate the available evidence for the efficacy and safety of anticonvulsants drugs in the prevention of migraine attacks in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Studies were selected through a comprehensive literature search. We included all types of study designs (controlled and uncontrolled) due to the limited evidence. Monthly migraine frequency was used as the primary outcome measure in most of the studies. Studies were classified into levels of evidence according to their design.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included with a total of 939 patients. Topiramate (4 randomized controlled trials [RCT], two uncontrolled trials), sodium valproate/divalproex sodium (two RCTs, one uncontrolled trial, two retrospective chart reviews) levetiracetam and zonisamide (both only uncontrolled studies) are the anticonvulsants that have been reported in the literature. The findings show that valproate is not different from placebo and topiramate may not be different but further randomized trials are needed. All drugs were well tolerated in this age group with no serious events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anticonvulsants in the prevention of migraine in children and adolescents is not adequately supported by methodologically sound RCTs. More research is needed in the future to establish the efficacy and safety of specific agents.

Comparison of the effectiveness of topiramate and sodium valproate in pediatric migraine

Frequent migraine headaches can have a significant impact on disability, prompting the need for early recognition and treatment. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of topiramate and sodium valproate for the prevention of pediatric migraine, retrospectively. Mean monthly migraine frequency, intensity, and duration in the 28 patients treated with topiramate decreased from 15.3 +/- 10.1 to 4.4 +/- 5.5 episode, from 6.8 +/- 1 to 3.2 +/- 1, and from 10.2 +/- 9.4 to 2.4 +/- 3.1 hours, respectively. Headache disability improved with a reduction of Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment score from 36 +/- 29.5 to 4.6 +/- 6.5 (P < .05). Similarly, mean monthly headache frequency, headache intensity, headache duration, and Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment score in the 20 patients treated with sodium valproate decreased from 20.1 +/- 10.2 to 6.6 +/- 8.6, from 7.1 +/- 1 to 3.4 +/- 2.1, from 7 +/- 12 to 1.4 +/- 2.5 hours, and from 20.5 +/- 16.1 to 5.5 +/- 9.2, respectively (P < .05). In conclusion, valproate and topiramate seem to be able to manage successfully childhood migraine without substantial differences in efficacy.

Divalproex sodium extended-release for the prophylaxis of migraine headache in adolescents: results of a stand-alone, long-term open-label safety study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this long-term open-label study in adolescents was to assess the safety and tolerability of divalproex sodium extended-release in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches.

BACKGROUND

Two formulations of divalproex sodium have demonstrated efficacy in the prevention of migraine headaches in adults. However, no medications are currently approved for this indication in adolescents, and long-term safety data on agents for migraine prevention are lacking for this younger population. Therefore, the current study was conducted to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of divalproex extended-release in adolescents with migraine headaches.

METHODS

This was a 12-month, phase 3, open-label, multicenter study of adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with migraine headaches diagnosed by International Headache Society criteria. Divalproex sodium extended-release was initiated at 500 mg/day for 15 days then increased to 1000 mg daily, with subsequent adjustments permitted within a dosing range of 250-1000 mg daily. Study visits were conducted at days 1 and 15 and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by adverse event collection, laboratory assessments, physical and neurological examinations, vital signs, electrocardiograms, the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser Side Effect Rating Scale, the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, and the Behavioral Assessment Scale for Children. Efficacy was evaluated by following the number of migraine headache days reported in subjects' headache diaries over sequential 4-week intervals for the duration of the trial.

RESULTS

A total of 241 subjects were enrolled and treated. The most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (19%), vomiting (18%), weight gain (12%), nasopharyngitis (11%), migraine (10%), and upper respiratory tract infection (10%). Ten (4%) subjects experienced serious adverse events, and 40 (17%) subjects discontinued because of an adverse event. Increases in ammonia levels were observed. No other clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory values, vital signs, rating scales, or electrocardiograms. Median 4-week migraine headache days decreased 75% between the first and the fourth months of the study (from 4.0 to 1.0) and remained at or below this level for the remainder of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this long-term open-label study of adolescents with migraine, the safety and tolerability profile of divalproex sodium extended-release was consistent with findings from previous trials in adults, as well as 2 studies recently completed in adolescents. In general, divalproex sodium extended-release was well-tolerated in adolescents with migraine.

Management of pediatric migraine: Current concepts and controversies

Migraine in children and adolescents is a common condition. Emerging knowledge about the pathophysiology of migraine is leading to new targeted treatments toward specific mechanisms of migraine. This review explores the evidence for different treatments for pediatric migraine including the periodic syndromes of childhood that commonly represent precursors to migraine.

[Antiepileptic drugs in pediatric migraine]

According to the criteria of the International Headache Society, migraine occurs in approximately 5 to 10% of children. As many as 30% of young patients with migraine experience such frequent and disabling attacks, or have unsatisfactory results and/or experience adverse effects with pharmacologic treatment of acute migraine attack, that daily preventive medications are required. Many studies have investigated the use of antiepileptic drugs in this indication but there is a paucity of placebo-controlled studies. So far, in the setting of migraine with and without aura, only flunarizine and topiramate have proved their efficacy in more than one placebo-controlled study. Uncontrolled studies suggest the possible efficacy of valproic acid, gabapentin, levetiracetam, zonisamide, and magnesium in preventive therapy of childhood periodic syndromes. Most of antiepileptic drugs used in pediatric preventive therapy are well tolerated. The most common adverse events are asthenia and somnolence.

Management of migraine in adolescents

Headaches in children and adolescents are still under-diagnosed. 75% of children are affected by primary headache by the age of 15 with 28% fitting the ICHD2 criteria of migraine. Migraine is considered a chronic disorder that can severely impact a child's daily activities, including schooling and socializing. Early recognition and aggressive therapy, with acute and prophylactic treatments, as well as intensive biobehavioral interventions, are essential to control the migraine attacks and reverse the progression into intractable disabling headache.

Diagnosing and managing headache in children

Once the correct diagnosis of migraine in a child is established, a treatment plan can be developed. This often entails a combination of acute therapies, preventive therapies, and biobehavioral interventions. Goals of treatment should be clearly established for the patients and parents, and realistic time courses discussed. Overall outcome in terms of disability and quality of life also may need to be addressed and included within the evaluation and management scheme.

Current therapies in childhood and adolescent migraine

This review summarizes recent guidelines for diagnosis of migraine in children and adolescents and inherent issues regarding their headaches that influence evaluation of therapies. With the shorter duration of pediatric migraine attacks and the prominent placebo responder rate, design of randomized clinical trials becomes more problematic than in the adult population. Regarding abortive therapies, several agents have appreciable efficacy in randomized controlled trials. Ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and sumatriptan nasal spray are probably beneficial and safe to use in pediatric migraine. For the minority of children who should be candidates for prophylactic therapy, there is a limited amount of information available for clinicians to make judicious treatment decisions.