Prediction of fetal D status from maternal plasma: introduction of a new noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping service

The use of free DNA for fetal RHD genotyping in the Rh negative pregnant patient-the time has come

Cell-free DNA to determine the fetal RHD genotype from the maternal circulation was first described in 1993. High throughput assays using polymerase chain reaction technology were introduced in Europe and gained widespread acceptance in the management of the Rhesus alloimmunized pregnancy. The specificity and sensitivity of these assays approached 99%. As confidence was gained with these results, Scandinavian countries began to employ cell-free DNA for fetal RHD typing as an integral component of their introduction of antenatal Rhesus immune globulin in non-alloimmunized pregnancies. Since 40% of RhD-negative pregnant women will carry an RhD-negative fetus, doses of Rhesus immune globulin were conserved. Recently 2 U.S. companies have introduced cell-free DNA assays for RHD as part of their noninvasive prenatal testing assays. Both utilize next generation sequencing and have developed methodologies to detect the aberrant RHD pseudogene and the hybrid RHD-CE-Ds genotype. In addition, excellent correlation studies with either neonatal genotyping or serology have been reported. The manufacturer of RhoGAM has recently announced a national shortage. Given the current availability of reliable cell-free DNA assays for determining the RHD status of the fetus, the time has come to implement this strategy to triage the antenatal use of Rhesus immune globulin in the U.S.

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Circulating cell-free DNA and its association with cardiovascular disease: what we know and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to explore a possible link between cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), which may hold valuable potential for future diagnostics.

RECENT FINDINGS

cfDNA has become topic of high interest across several medical fields. cfDNA is used as a diagnostic biomarker in cancer, prenatal care, and transplantation. In addition, cfDNA may play an unrecognized role in biological processes that are involved in or underlying various disease states, for example, inflammation. Elevated levels of cfDNA are associated with various elements of CVD, cardio-metabolic risk factors, and autoimmune diseases. Mitochondrial cfDNA and neutrophil extracellular traps may play distinct roles. Total circulating cfDNA may reflect the unspecific accumulation of stressors and the organism's susceptibility and resilience to such stressors. As such, cfDNA, in a stressful situation, may provide predictive value for future development of CVD. We suggest exploring such possibility through a large-scale prospective cohort study of pregnant women.

SUMMARY

There is no doubt that cfDNA is a valuable biomarker. For CVD, its potential is indicated but less explored. New studies may identify cfDNA as a valuable circulating cardiovascular risk marker to help improve risk stratification.

Noninvasive screening of fetal RHD genotype in Chinese pregnant women with serologic RhD-negative phenotype

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping has been provided to nonimmunized RhD-negative pregnant women to guide anti-D prophylaxis. Among the Chinese, more than 30% of the RhD-negative phenotype is associated with variant RHD alleles, which would limit the accuracy of fetal RHD status prediction; thus, more targeting and proper programs need to be developed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction PCR (qPCR) or Sanger sequencing on all RHD exons was used to detect maternal RHD genotypes. For pregnant women with RHD*01N.01 or RHD*01N.03 alleles, the presence of RHD exons 5 and 10 in cell-free DNA was determined by qPCR. For pregnant women with the RHD(1227G>A) allele, high-throughput sequencing on exon 9 of the RHD gene and RHCE gene was used to predict fetal RhD phenotype.

RESULTS

Among 65 cases of Chinese pregnant women with the serologic RhD-negative phenotype, three major genotypes were identified: RHD*01N.01/RHD*01N.01 (61.5%), RHD*01N.01/RHD(1227G>A) or RHD*01N.03/RHD(1227G>A) (20%), and RHD*01N.01/RHD*01N.03 (13.8%), along with three cases of minor genotypes (4.6%). For 43 pregnant women with the RHD*01N.01 or RHD*01N.03 alleles, qPCR on maternal cell-free DNA yielded a 98.5% (42/43) accuracy rate and 100% successful prediction rate. High-throughput sequencing was successfully used to predict fetal RhD phenotypes for 13 pregnant women with RHD(1227G>A).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of maternal RHD genotyping, fetal genotyping through qPCR or high-throughput sequencing can improve the accuracy and success rate of prenatal fetal RhD phenotype prediction among Chinese pregnant women. It plays a potential role in guiding anti-D prophylaxis and pregnancy management in Chinese pregnant women.

Fetal RHD Screening in RH1 Negative Pregnant Women: Experience in Switzerland

RH1 incompatibility between mother and fetus can cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Switzerland, fetal RHD genotyping from maternal blood has been recommended from gestational age 18 onwards since the year 2020. This facilitates tailored administration of RH immunoglobulin (RHIG) only to RH1 negative women carrying a RH1 positive fetus. Data from 30 months of noninvasive fetal RHD screening is presented. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 7192 plasma samples using a commercial kit, followed by an in-house qPCR to detect RHD exons 5 and 7, in addition to an amplification control. Valid results were obtained from 7072 samples, with 4515 (64%) fetuses typed RHD positive and 2556 (36%) fetuses being RHD negative. A total of 120 samples led to inconclusive results due to the presence of maternal or fetal RHD variants (46%), followed by women being serologically RH1 positive (37%), and technical issues (17%). One sample was typed false positive, possibly due to contamination. No false negative results were observed. We show that unnecessary administration of RHIG can be avoided for more than one third of RH1 negative pregnant women in Switzerland. This reduces the risks of exposure to a blood-derived product and conserves this limited resource to women in actual need.

Old World Medieval Treponema pallidum Complex Treponematosis: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Introduction of 1 Treponema pallidum complex pathogen in naive European populations following the return of Christopher Columbus' troops from Central America in 1493 is a central dogma in venereology.

METHODS

Among skeletal elements from the seventh or eighth century uncovered in Roquevaire, France, individual RS-1003 femur macroscopically suspected of having an infectious disease was investigated by means of paleoautoimmunohistochemistry, direct metagenomics, and paleoserology, along with 1 control femur from an apparently healthy individual (R-1003) and experimental negative controls.

RESULTS

RS-1003 femur showed infectious bone; paleoautoimmunohistochemistry of the lesions led to microscopic detection of a T. pallidum complex pathogen. Phylogenetic analyses comprising 71 T. pallidum complex-specific reads covering 2.37% of the T. pallidum subsp. pallidum reference genome sequence revealed an ancestral T. pallidum complex pathogen in the lesion. Paleoserology detecting T. pallidum-specific antigens confirmed positive serological findings in individual RS-1003. Individual R-1003 and the negative controls remained negative.

CONCLUSIONS

This case, predating by 8 centuries previous detections of T. pallidum complex treponematosis in Europe, indicated that European populations were not naive to these pathogens before the 1493 introduction of a Central American T. pallidum complex pathogen overwhelming the T. pallidum ones previously circulating in the Old World. These data break a century-old dogma in medical microbiology.

Early noninvasive prenatal paternity testing by targeted fetal DNA analysis

Today the challenge in paternity testing is to provide an accurate noninvasive assay that can be performed early during pregnancy. This requires the use of novel analytical methods capable of detecting the low fraction of circulating fetal DNA in maternal blood. We previously showed that forensic compound markers such as deletion/insertion polymorphisms-short tandem repeats (DIP-STR) can efficiently resolve complex mixed biological evidence including the target analysis of paternally inherited fetal alleles. In this study, we describe for the first time the validation of this type of markers in the first trimester of pregnancies, in addition to defining the statistical framework to evaluate paternity. To do so, we studied 47 DIP-STRs in 87 cases, with blood samples collected throughout gestation starting from the seven weeks of amenorrhea. Fetal DNA detection in the first trimester shows a false negative rate as low as 6%. The combined paternity index (CPI) results indicate that seven markers with fully informative genotypes are sufficient to determine the paternity. This study demonstrates that DIP-STR markers can be used from early pregnancy and that a small set of markers (about 40) is sufficient to address the question of paternity. The novel method offers substantial improvements over similar approaches in terms of reduced number of markers, lower costs and increased accuracy.

Single-exon approach to non-invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anti-D prophylaxis, administered to RhD-negative women, has significantly reduced the incidence of RhD immunization. Non-invasive fetal RHD screening has been used in Stockholm for more than 10 years to identify women who will benefit from prophylaxis. The method is based on a single-exon approach and is used in early pregnancy. The aim of this study was to update the performance of the method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The single exon assay from Devyser AB is a multiplex kit detecting both exon 4 of the RHD gene and the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 1 ml of plasma from EDTA blood taken during early pregnancy, weeks 10-12. The genetic RHD results were compared with serological typing of newborns for a determination of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

In total, 4337 pregnancies were included in the study; 44 samples (1%) were inconclusive either due to maternal RHD gene variants (n = 34) or technical reasons (n = 10). Of the remaining 4293 pregnancies, a total number of nine discrepant results were found. False positive results (n = 7) were mainly (n = 4) due to RHD gene variants in the child. False-negative results were found in two cases, of which one was caused by a technical error. None of the false-negative cases was due to RHD gene variants. Overall, the sensitivity of the method was 99.93% and specificity 99.56%.

CONCLUSION

The single-exon assay used in this study is correlated with high sensitivity and specificity.

The Next Frontier in Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnostics: Cell-Free Fetal DNA Analysis for Monogenic Disease Assessment

With the widespread clinical adoption of noninvasive screening for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies based on cell-free DNA analysis from maternal plasma, more researchers are turning their attention to noninvasive prenatal assessment for single-gene disorders. The development of a spectrum of approaches to analyze cell-free DNA in maternal circulation, including relative mutation dosage, relative haplotype dosage, and size-based methods, has expanded the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing to sex-linked and autosomal recessive disorders. Cell-free fetal DNA analysis for several of the more prevalent single-gene disorders has recently been introduced into clinical service. This article reviews the analytical approaches currently available and discusses the extent of the clinical implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing for single-gene disorders. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Volume 23 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.

RESULTS

In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities during the First Trimester

The quality of prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities has advanced with improved resolution of ultrasound imaging and cytogenetic/molecular analysis. In this article, we briefly review the history of diagnosing fetal abnormalities and the current status of prenatal diagnosis during the first trimester (up to the first 14 weeks' gestation), focusing especially on fetal malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. As for detectable morphological abnormalities, roughly half of all major structural anomalies including those in the central nervous system, cardiovascular system and gastrointestinal system can be detected, if not definitely diagnosed. For screening of chromosomal abnormalities, especially for trisomy 21, ultrasound soft markers such as increased nuchal translucency, maternal serum markers and their combinations have been implemented. More recently, non-invasive prenatal testing, by analyzing cell-free DNA in maternal serum, is now available to detect chromosomal abnormalities with higher predictability. Although invasive chorionic villus sampling offers definite diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities during the first trimester, non-invasive diagnostic techniques are patient-friendly and promising in the future perspectives on prenatal diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis: Expanded NIPT that includes conditions other than trisomies 13, 18, and 21 should be offered

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on analysis of cell free DNA circulating in the maternal plasma has been available clinically to screen for chromosomal abnormalities since 2011. There is significant evidence to suggest that NIPT has revolutionised prenatal screening for the common trisomies 13, 18, and 21. However, the evidence in favour of its extended use to screen for conditions other than these trisomies remains a topic of debate with no national or international organisation supporting clinical implementation for these indications. In the debate presented here - "Expanded NIPT that includes conditions other than trisomies 13, 18, and 21 should be offered" - we will see the pros and cons of screening for a wider range of chromosomal problems. The discussion presented swung the vote from 65% in favour and 35% against before the arguments were voiced to 41% in favour and 59% against. This significant swing in the vote indicates that the majority of our community feel more evidence is required before clinical implementation of extended NIPT.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Fetal Blood Group Genotype and Its Application in the Management of Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) imposes great healthcare burden being associated with maternal alloimmunization against parental-inherited fetal red blood cell antigens causing fetal anemia or death. Noninvasive prenatal analysis (NIPT) provides safe fetal RHD genotyping for early identification of risk pregnancies and proper management guidance. We aimed to conduct systematic review and meta-analysis on NIPT's beneficial application, in conjunction with quantitative maternal alloantibody analysis, for early diagnosis of pregnancies at risk. Search for relevant articles was done in; PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Ovid (January 2006April 2020), including only English-written articles reporting reference tests and accuracy data. Nineteen eligible studies were critically appraised. NIPT was estimated highly sensitive/specific for fetal RHD genotyping beyond 11-week gestation. Amplifications from ≥2 exons are optimum to increase accuracy. NIPT permits cost-effectiveness, precious resources sparing, and low emotional stress. Knowledge of parental ethnicity is important for correct NIPT result interpretations and quantitative screening. Cut-off titer ≥8-up-to-32 is relevant for anti-D alloantibodies, while, lower titer is for anti-K. Alloimmunization is influenced by maternal RHD status, gravida status, and history of adverse obstetrics. In conclusion, NIPT allows evidence-based provision of routine anti-D immunoprophylaxis and estimates potential fetal risks for guiding further interventions. Future large-scale studies investigating NIPT's non-RHD genotyping within different ethnic groups and in presence of clinically significant alloantibodies are needed.

Immunohematologic aspects of alloimmunization and alloantibody detection: A focus on pregnancy and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

Alloimmunization to non-ABO, red blood cell (RBC) antigens remains one of the most clinically-relevant complexities faced by blood banking practitioners. In the setting of transfusion therapy, these antibodies raise risks for incompatibilities, while for pregnant patients they can mediate deadly forms of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. As such, a thorough understanding of pathways that lead to alloimmunization, as well as the tools used by blood banks to detect alloantibodies, is critical to transfusion practice. In this review, in which alloimmunization in the setting of pregnancy will be emphasized, we will review: 1) the clinical impacts of RBC alloantibodies in the peri-partum period; 2) the current pathophysiologic mechanisms thought to influence non-ABO antigen alloimmunization; 3) the strengths and weaknesses of laboratory tools used in aiding alloimmunization detection; and 4) future directions of the transfusion community related to alloimmunization impacting pregnancy.

Genome-wide noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders: Current and future trends

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is a risk-free alternative to invasive methods for prenatal diagnosis, e.g. amniocentesis. NIPD is based on the presence of fetal DNA within the mother’s plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Though currently available for various monogenic diseases through detection of point mutations, NIPD is limited to detecting one mutation or up to several genes simultaneously. Noninvasive prenatal whole exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS) has demonstrated genome-wide detection of fetal point mutations in a few studies. However, Genome-wide NIPD of monogenic disorders currently has several challenges and limitations, mainly due to the small amounts of cfDNA and fetal-derived fragments, and the deep coverage required. Several approaches have been suggested for addressing these hurdles, based on various technologies and algorithms. The first relevant software tool, Hoobari, recently became available. Here we review the approaches proposed and the paths required to make genome-wide monogenic NIPD widely available in the clinic.

Impact of long-term storage of plasma and cell-free DNA on measured DNA quantity and fetal fraction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Optimal sample storage conditions are essential for non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free fetal and total DNA. We investigated the effect of long-term storage of plasma samples and extracted cfDNA using qPCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fetal and total cfDNA yield and fetal fraction were calculated before and after storage of plasma for 0-6 years at -25°C. Dilution experiments were performed to investigate PCR inhibition. Extraction with or without proteinase K was used to examine protein dissociation. Storage of extracted cfDNA was investigated by testing aliquots immediately, and after 18 months and 3 years of storage at -25°C.

RESULTS

We observed a marked increase in the levels of amplifiable fetal and total DNA in plasma stored for 2-3 years, and fetal fraction was slightly decreased after 3 years of storage. cfDNA detection was independent of proteinase K during DNA extraction in plasma samples stored >2 years, indicating a loss of proteins from DNA over time, which was likely to account for the observed increase in DNA yields. Measured fetal and total DNA quantities, as well as fetal fraction, increased in stored, extracted cfDNA.

CONCLUSION

Fetal and total cell-free DNA is readily detectable in plasma after long-term storage at -25°C. However, substantial variation in measured DNA quantities and fetal fraction means caution may be required when using stored plasma and extracted cfDNA for test development or validation purposes.

Introduction of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Blood Group and Platelet Antigens from Cell-Free Plasma DNA Using Digital PCR

Background

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal antigens is a common standard for targeted immune prophylaxis in RhD-mediated hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, and is most frequently done by quantitative PCR (qPCR). A similar approach is considered for other blood group and human platelet alloantigens (HPA). Because of a higher sensitivity compared to qPCR for rare molecule detection, we established and validated digital PCR (dPCR) assays for the detection of RHD exons 3, 5 and 7, KEL1, HPA-1a, and HPA-5b from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. The dPCR assays for the Y-chromosomal marker amelogenin and autosomal SNPs were implemented as controls for the proof of fetal DNA.

Methods

Validation was performed on dilution series of mixed plasma samples from volunteer donors with known genotypes. After preamplification of the target loci, two-color (FAM and VIC) TaqMan^TM probe chemistry and chip-based dPCR were applied. The assays for RHD included GAPDH as an internal control. For the diallelic markers KEL1/2, HPA-1a/b, HPA-5a/b, and AMEL-X/Y and 3 autosomal SNPs, the probes enabled allelic discrimination in the two fluorescence channels. The dPCR protocol for NIPT was applied to plasma samples from pregnant women.

Results

The RHD exon 5 assay allowed the detection of a 0.05% RHD target in an RhD-negative background, whereas the exon 7 assay required at least a 0.25% target. The exon 3 assay showed the highest background and required at least a 2.5% RHD target for reliable detection. The dPCR assays for the diallelic markers revealed similar sensitivity and enabled the detection of at least a 0.5% target allele. The HPA-1a assay was the most sensitive and allowed target detection in plasma mixtures containing only 0.05% HPA-1a. The plasma samples from 13 pregnant women at different gestational ages showed unambiguous positive and negative results for the analyzed targets.

Conclusion

Analysis of cfDNA from maternal plasma using dPCR is suitable for the detection of fetal alleles. Because of the high sensitivity of the assays, the NIPT protocol for RhD, KEL1, and HPA can also be applied to earlier stages of pregnancy.

Cell-Free Fetal DNA: A Novel Biomarker for Early Prediction of Pre-eclampsia and Other Obstetric Complications

Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, especially Pre-eclampsia is one of the major causes of increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality all over the world. Early prediction of pre-eclampsia is the need of modern obstetrics, as this can timely prevent the progress of disease as well as related fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. In addition to the screening of fetal aneuploidies, Rhesus-D status, fetal sex, single gene disorders, the cell-free fetal Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) quantification has emerged as a promising biomarker for the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Hence, its use can help in the early prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, especially pre-eclampsia even before the appearance of symptoms. Furthermore, in future, it can also help in the determination of the complete DNA sequence of every gene of the fetus. The present review focuses on recent literature concerning the use of cell-free fetal DNA in early prediction of preeclampsia as well as for non-invasive prenatal genetic screening of fetus for various disorders. Methods: The recent literature related to cell-free fetal DNA was searched from numerous English language journals and published peer-reviewed articles on Pubmed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and various government agencies till 2016.

Fetal RHD detection from circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma: validation of a diagnostic kit using automatic extraction and frozen DNA

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate non-invasive RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) using different DNA extraction methods and of fresh and frozen extracted cff-DNA.

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive RHD genotyping of cff-DNA predicts fetal RhD phenotype, allowing for the rational implementation of antenatal immunoprophylaxis and representing a big step forward in the management of RhD-immunised women. Validation of a diagnostic method is mandatory before its clinical application.

METHODS

RhD-negative pregnant women were recruited at different gestational ages. The cff-DNA extraction was carried out using manual and automatic methods in order to improve cff-DNA yield and optimise the extraction. Fetal RHD genotyping was performed using a commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit, and the results were compared with postnatal serological RhD determination on cord blood.

RESULTS

Overall, 133 plasma samples were examined for the validation process, and a total of 423 tests were performed. No differences have been observed between the two extraction methods or between fresh or frozen cff-DNA regarding cff-DNA stability and quality parameters. There was 100% concordance between fetal RHD genotyping of cff-DNA and RhD phenotype on cord blood for both extraction methods on both fresh and frozen cff-DNA.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the reliability of automatic and manual cff-DNA extraction methods and the possibility of freezing extracted cff-DNA when performing RHD genotyping. This result might be relevant for improving laboratory work and organisation through the development of a standardised procedure for fetal RHD genotyping on cff-DNA, laying the foundations for evidence-based use of anti-D Ig prophylaxis in RhD pregnant women.

Validated Reference Panel from Renewable Source of Genomic DNA Available for Standardization of Blood Group Genotyping

Extended blood group genotyping is an invaluable tool used for prevention of alloimmunization. Genotyping is particularly suitable when antigens are weak, specific antisera are unavailable, or accurate phenotyping is problematic because of a disease state or recent transfusions. In addition, genotyping facilitates establishment of mass-scale patient-matched donor databases. However, standardization of genotyping technologies has been hindered by the lack of reference panels. A well-characterized renewable reference panel for standardization of blood group genotyping was developed. The panel consists of genomic DNA lyophilized and stored in glass vials. Genomic DNA was extracted in bulk from immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines, generated by Epstein-Barr virus transformation of peripheral blood lymphocytes harvested from volunteer blood donors. The panel was validated by an international collaborative study involving 28 laboratories that tested each DNA panel member for 41 polymorphisms associated with 17 blood group systems. Overall, analysis of genotyping results showed >98% agreement with the expected outcomes, demonstrating suitability of the material for use as reference. Highest levels of discordance were observed for the genes CR1, CD55, BSG, and RHD. Although limited, observed inconsistencies and procedural limitations reinforce the importance of reference reagents to standardize and harmonize results. Results of stability and accelerated degradation studies support the suitability of this panel for use as reference reagent for blood group genotyping assay development and standardization.

Noninvasive Approaches to Prenatal Diagnosis: Historical Perspective and Future Directions

The field of prenatal screening and diagnosis has undergone enormous progress over the past four decades. Most of this period has been characterized by gradual improvements in the technical and public health aspects of prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Compared to the direct analysis of fetal cells from amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, noninvasive approaches using maternal blood or ultrasound have the great advantage of posing no risk of miscarriage to the pregnancy. Recent advances in molecular genetics and DNA sequencing have revolutionized both the accuracy and the range of noninvasive testing for genetic abnormalities using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. Many of these advances have already been incorporated into clinical care, including diagnosis of fetal blood group and aneuploidy screening. The accelerated pace of these recent developments is creating not just technical and logistical challenges, but is also magnifying the ethical and public policy issues traditionally associated with this field.

Usefulness of Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping towards Immunoprophylaxis Optimization

Introduction: Since anti-D immunoprophylaxis given to D-negative pregnant women is a blood product, blood donations have an impact on the availability of prophylactic doses. The Pan American Health Organization reported, in June 2017, that less than half of blood donors are volunteers in Latin America and the Caribbean. In these countries, guidelines for use of anti-D prophylaxis are still controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the convenience of a simple and cost-effectivene non-invasive prenatal diagnostic assay for anti-D prophylaxis optimization in multiethnic populations. Methods: Cell-free fetal DNA from plasma samples of D-negative pregnant women were analyzed by real-time PCR for simultaneous amplification of sequences of exons 5 and 10 of the RHD gene. Fetal RHD genotype was determined in 111 pregnant women. Neonates' phenotype was determined 72 h after birth. Results: Genotyping predicted fetal phenotype with 100% accuracy. Prenatal diagnosis showed 78% RHD-positive and 22% RHD-negative neonates. Conclusion: We demonstrated that, beyond the large genetic variation of the Rh system and the numerous D variants present in multiethnic groups, non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping using two sequences of the gene can be enough for clinical application in an admixed population. This robust technique of simple implementation allows to determine fetal RHD in maternal blood with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The introduction of fetal RhD genotyping as part of an antenatal screening program constitutes a reliable manner to optimize anti-D prophylaxis; however, it has not been implemented so far in most American countries.

Identification of a de novo fetal variant in osteogenesis imperfecta by targeted sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which involves analysis of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal plasma, is highly effective for detecting feto-placental chromosome aneuploidy. However, recent studies suggested that coverage-based shallow-depth NIPT cannot accurately detect smaller single or multi-loci genetic variants. To assess the fetal genotype of any locus using maternal plasma, we developed a novel genotyping algorithm named pseudo tetraploid genotyping (PTG). We performed paired-end captured sequencing of the plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA), in which case a phenotypically healthy woman is suspected to be carrying a fetus with genetic defect. After a series of independent filtering of 111,407 SNPs, we found one variant in COL1A1 graded with high pathogenic potential which might cause osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Then, we verified this mutation by Sanger sequencing of fetal and parental blood cells. In addition, we evaluated the accuracy and detection rate of the PTG algorithm through direct sequencing of the genomic DNA from maternal and fetal blood cells. Collectively, our study developed an intuitive and cost-effective method for the noninvasive detection of pathogenic mutations, and successfully identified a de novo variant in COL1A1 (c.2596 G > A, p.Gly866Ser) in the fetus implicated in OI.

Development of a comprehensive noninvasive prenatal test

Our aim was to develop and apply a comprehensive noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) by using high-coverage targeted next-generation sequencing to estimate fetal fraction, determine fetal sex, and detect trisomy and monogenic disease without parental genotype information. We analyzed 45 pregnancies, 40 mock samples, and eight mother-child pairs to generate 35 simulated datasets. Fetal fraction (FF) was estimated based on analysis of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) allele fraction distribution. A Z-score was calculated for trisomy of chromosome 21 (T21), and fetal sex detection. Monogenic disease detection was performed through variant analysis. Model validation was performed using the simulated datasets. The novel model to estimate FF was robust and accurate (r2= 0.994, p-value < 2.2e-16). For samples with FF > 0.04, T21 detection had 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 63.06 to 100%) and 98.53% specificity (95% CI: 92.08 to 99.96%). Fetal sex was determined with 100% accuracy. We later performed a proof of concept for monogenic disease diagnosis of 5/7 skeletal dysplasia cases. In conclusion, it is feasible to perform a comprehensive NIPT by using only data from high coverage targeted sequencing, which, in addition to detecting trisomies, also make it possible to identify pathogenic variants of the candidate genes for monogenic diseases.

Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Foetal RHD genotyping can be predicted by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using cell-free foetal DNA extracted from maternal plasma. The object of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of non-invasive RHD foetal genotyping, using a commercial multiple-exon assay, as a guide to appropriate administration of targeted antenatal immunoprophylaxis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cell-free foetal DNA was extracted from plasma of RhD-negative women between 11-30 weeks of pregnancy. The foetal RHD genotype was determined non-invasively by qPCR amplification of exons 5, 7 and 10 of the RHD gene using the Free DNA Fetal Kit^® RhD. Results were compared with serological RhD cord blood typing at birth. The analysis of diagnostic accuracy was restricted to the period (24-28⁺⁶ weeks) during which foetal genotyping is usually performed for targeted antenatal immunoprophylaxis.

RESULTS

RHD foetal genotyping was performed on 367 plasma samples (24-28⁺⁶ weeks). Neonatal RhD phenotype results were available for 284 pregnancies. Foetal RHD status was inconclusive in 9/284 (3.2%) samples, including four cases with RhD maternal variants. Two false-positive results were registered. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI: 94.0-100). The diagnostic accuracy was 99.3% (95% CI: 98.3-100), decreasing to 96.1% (95% CI: 93.9-98.4) when the inconclusive results were included. The negative and positive predictive values were 100% (95% CI: 100-100) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97.6-100), respectively. There was one false-negative result in a sample collected at 18 weeks. After inclusion of samples at early gestational age (<23⁺⁶ week), sensitivity and accuracy were 99.6% (95% CI: 98.7-100) and 95.5% (95% CI: 93.3-97.8), respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that foetal RHD detection on maternal plasma using a commercial multiple-exon assay is a reliable and accurate tool to predict foetal RhD phenotype. It can be a safe guide for the appropriate administration of targeted prenatal immunoprophylaxis.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping for RhD negative women stratified into RHD gene deletion or variant groups: comparative accuracy using two blood collection tube types

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping in Australia to reduce anti-D usage will need to accommodate both prolonged sample transport times and a diverse population demographic harbouring a range of RHD blood group gene variants. We compared RHD genotyping accuracy using two blood sample collection tube types for RhD negative women stratified into deleted RHD gene haplotype and RHD gene variant cohorts. Maternal blood samples were collected into EDTA and cell-free (cf)DNA stabilising (BCT) tubes from two sites, one interstate. Automated DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to amplify RHD exons 5 and 10 and CCR5. Automated analysis flagged maternal RHD variants, which were classified by genotyping. Time between sample collection and processing ranged from 2.9 to 187.5 hours. cfDNA levels increased with time for EDTA (range 0.03-138 ng/μL) but not BCT samples (0.01-3.24 ng/μL). For the 'deleted' cohort (n=647) all fetal RHD genotyping outcomes were concordant, excepting for one unexplained false negative EDTA sample. Matched against cord RhD serology, negative predictive values using BCT and EDTA tubes were 100% and 99.6%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 99.7% for both types. Overall 37.2% of subjects carried an RhD negative baby. The 'variant' cohort (n=15) included one novel RHD and eight hybrid or African pseudogene variants. Review for fetal RHD specific signals, based on one exon, showed three EDTA samples discordant to BCT, attributed to high maternal cfDNA levels arising from prolonged transport times. For the deleted haplotype cohort, fetal RHD genotyping accuracy was comparable for samples collected in EDTA and BCT tubes despite higher cfDNA levels in the EDTA tubes. Capacity to predict fetal RHD genotype for maternal carriers of hybrid or pseudogene RHD variants requires stringent control of cfDNA levels. We conclude that fetal RHD genotyping is feasible in the Australian environment to avoid unnecessary anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis.

Epigenetic approaches for the detection of fetal DNA in maternal plasma

The presence of fetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women has opened up new possibilities for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Over the past decades, different types of fetal markers have been developed, initially based on discriminative genetic markers such as male-specific signals or paternally-inherited polymorphisms, and gradually evolved to the detection of fetal-specific transcripts or epigenetic signatures. This development has extended the coverage of the application of cell-free fetal DNA to essentially all pregnancies, regardless of the gender of the fetus or its polymorphic status. In this review, we present an overview of the development of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis through epigenetics. We introduce the basis of how fetal DNA could be detected from a large background of maternal DNA in maternal plasma based on fetal-specific DNA methylation patterns. We evaluate the methodologies involved and discuss the factors that affect the robustness of the detection. We review the progress in adopting fetal epigenetic markers for noninvasive prenatal assessment of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and pregnancy-associated disorders. We conclude with comments on the future directions regarding the search for new fetal epigenetic markers and the clinical implementation of epigenetic approaches for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.

Cell-free Fetal Nucleic Acid Identifier Markers in Maternal Circulation

From the discovery of cell-free fetal (cff)-DNA in 1997 so far, many studies have been performed on various aspects of cff-nucleic acid. It is undoubted that currently, invasive prenatal diagnosis progresses to the noninvasive test. However, there are many problems. One of the most challenging issues in this field is differentiation and detection of the small amount of cff-nucleic acid in maternal plasma. Many markers and methods have been used for this purpose. This review makes an attempt to review and compare the studies in the field. Six identifier markers including Y-specific sequence, polymorphisms, epigenetic difference, DNA size difference, fetal mRNA, and microRNA as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each marker are discussed. This review provides a relatively perfect set on cff-nucleic acid biomarkers in various physiological and pathological status of pregnancy, helping to review and compare the prior obtained results, and improving designation in future studies.

Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis

The past decade has seen the development of technologies that have revolutionized prenatal genetic testing; that is, genetic testing from conception until birth. Genome-wide single-cell arrays and high-throughput sequencing analyses are dramatically increasing our ability to detect embryonic and fetal genetic lesions, and have substantially improved embryo selection for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Moreover, both invasive and non-invasive mutation scanning of the genome are helping to identify the genetic causes of prenatal developmental disorders. These advances are changing clinical practice and pose novel challenges for genetic counselling and prenatal care.

Determination of Fetal RHD Genotype Including the RHD Pseudogene in Maternal Plasma

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of fetal RHD genotype and RHD pseudogene determination in a multiethnical population.

METHODS

Prospective study involving D-negative pregnant women. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 1 ml of maternal plasma by an automated system (MagNA Pure Compact, Roche) and real-time PCR was performed in triplicate targeting the RHD gene exons 5 and 7. Inconclusive samples underwent RHD pseudogene testing by real-time PCR analysis employing novel primers and probe.

RESULTS

A positive result was observed in 128/185 (69.2%) samples and negative in 50 (27.0%). Umbilical cord blood phenotype confirmed all cases with a positive or negative PCR result. Seven (3.8%) cases were found inconclusive (exon 7 amplification only) and RHD pseudogene testing with both conventional and real-time PCR demonstrated a positive result in five of them, while two samples were also RHD pseudogene negative.

CONCLUSION

Real-time PCR targeting RHD exons 5 and 7 simultaneously in maternal plasma is an accurate method for the diagnosis of fetal D genotype in our population. The RHD pseudogene real-time PCR assay is feasible and is particularly useful in populations with a high prevalence of this allele.

Fetal RHD Genotyping Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Pregnancy of RhD Negative Women in South of Iran

BACKGROUND

Maternal-fetal RhD antigen incompatibility causes approximately 50% of clinically significant alloimmunization cases. The routine use of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin has dramatically reduced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Recently, fetal RHD genotyping in RhD negative pregnant women has been suggested for appropriate use of anti-D immunoglobulin antenatal prophylaxis and decrease unnecessary prenatal interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, in order to develop a reliable and non-invasive method for fetal RHD genotyping, cell free fetal DNA (cffD- NA) was extracted from maternal plasma. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for detection of RHD exons 7, 5, 10 and intron 4 was performed and the results were compared to the serological results of cord blood cells as the gold standard method. SRY gene and hypermethylated Ras-association domain family member 1 (RASSF1A) gene were used to confirm the presence of fetal DNA in male and female fetuses, respectively.

RESULTS

Out of 48 fetuses between 8 and 32 weeks (wks) of gestational age (GA), we correctly diagnosed 45 cases (93.75%) of RHD positive fetuses and 2 cases (4.16%) of the RHD negative one. Exon 7 was amplified in one sample, while three other RHD gene sequences were not detected; the sample was classified as inconclusive, and the RhD serology result after birth showed that the fetus was RhD-negative.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high accuracy of the qPCR method using cffDNA for fetal RHD genotyping and implicate on the efficiency of this technique to predict the competence of anti-D immunoglobulin administration.

Prevalence of RhD status and clinical application of non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal RHD in maternal plasma: a 5 year experience in Cyprus

BACKGROUND

After the discovery that cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is circulating in the maternal plasma of pregnant women, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for fetal RhD in maternal plasma in RhD negative women at risk for haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) was clinically established and used by many laboratories. The objectives of this study are: (a) to assess the feasibility and report our experiences of the routine implementation of fetal RHD genotyping by analysis of cffDNA extracted from maternal plasma of RhD negative women at risk of HDN, and (b) to estimate the RhD phenotype frequencies, the RHD genotype frequencies and the RhD zygosity in the Cypriot population.

METHODS

cffDNA was extracted from maternal plasma of 73 RhD negative pregnant women. Real-Time Multiplex-PCR was used to amplify regions of RHD gene in exons 4, 5 and 10. RhD phenotypes were determined on 445 random samples using conventional agglutination slide test.

RESULTS

The fetus was predicted to be positive in 53 cases and negative in 18 cases. Two of cases were identified as D-variants, weak D type-1 and 11. The frequency of RhD negative homozygosity in the Cypriot population was estimated to be 7.2%, while the frequencies of RHD hemizygosity and RhD positive homozygosity was calculated to be 39.2 and 53.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Fetal RHD genotyping can be accurately determined using cffDNA from maternal plasma. The implementation of the test has eliminated all use of unnecessary anti-D and reduced the total use of anti-D by 25.3% while achieving appropriate management of the RhD negative pregnancies.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the molecular era

Maternal-fetal red cell antigen incompatibility can lead to alloimmunization, maternal immunoglobulin transplacental transfer, and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The use of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) has sharply decreased the incidence of and mortality from HDFN due to RhD allosensitization. The ability to identify pregnancies/fetuses at risk of HDFN has significantly improved due to paternal molecular RHD zygosity testing, and non-invasive fetal molecular diagnostics for detecting putative antigen(s) (notably RhD) in fetuses utilizing cff-DNA in maternal plasma. Fetal RHD genotyping using cff-DNA has become increasingly accurate for fetal RHD detection, prompting some countries to implement targeted RAADP through mass screening programs of RhD-negative pregnant women. Along with middle cerebral artery Doppler ultrasonography for predicting fetal anemia, non-invasive fetal molecular diagnostics have greatly decreased the need for invasive diagnostic procedures in pregnancies at risk for severe HDFN. This review highlights these molecular advancements in HDFN-related prenatal diagnostics.