Quality of life during and between hemodialysis treatments: role of L-carnitine supplementation

Carnitine supplements for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Carnitine deficiency is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who require dialysis. Several clinical studies have suggested that carnitine supplementation is beneficial for dialysis-related symptoms. However, the clinical effectiveness and potential adverse effects of carnitine supplementation in dialysis patients have not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carnitine supplementation for the treatment of dialysis-related complications in CKD patients requiring dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 August 2022 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs (RCTs in which allocation to treatment was obtained by alternation, use of alternate medical records, date of birth, or other predictable methods) that compared carnitine supplements with placebo or standard care in people with CKD requiring dialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted study data and assessed study quality. We used a random-effects model to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data.  We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity amongst the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean differences (SMD) if different scales were used, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 52 studies (47 parallel RCTs and five cross-over RCTs) (3398 randomised participants). All studies compared L-carnitine with a placebo, other treatment, or no treatment. Standard care was continued as co-interventions in each group. Most studies were judged to have an unclear or high risk of bias. L-carnitine may have little or no effect on the quality of life (QoL) SF-36 physical component score (PCS) (4 studies, 134 participants: SMD 0.57, 95% CI -0.15 to 1.28; I² = 73%; low certainty of evidence), and the total QoL score (Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL), VAS (general well-being), or PedsQL) (3 studies, 230 participants: SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.25; I² = 0%; low certainty of evidence). L-carnitine may improve SF-36 mental component score (MCS) (4 studies, 134 participants: SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.18; I² = 42%; low certainty of evidence). L-carnitine may have little or no effect on fatigue score (2 studies, 353 participants: SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.23; I² = 0%; low certainty of evidence), adverse events (12 studies, 1041 participants: RR, 1.14, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.51; I² = 0%; low certainty of evidence), muscle cramps (2 studies, 102 participants: RR, 0.44, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.09; I² = 23%; low certainty of evidence), and intradialytic hypotension (3 studies, 128 participants: RR, 0.76, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.69; I² = 0%; low certainty of evidence). L-carnitine may improve haemoglobin levels (26 studies, 1795 participants: MD 0.46 g/dL, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.74; I² = 86%; low certainty of evidence) and haematocrit values (14 studies, 950 participants: MD 1.78%, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.18; I² = 84%; low certainty of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence does not currently support the use of carnitine supplementation in the treatment of dialysis-related carnitine deficiency. Although carnitine supplementation may slightly improve anaemia-related markers, carnitine supplementation makes little or no difference to adverse events. However, these conclusions are based on limited data and, therefore, should be interpreted with caution.

Effect of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Inflammatory Markers and Serum Glucose in Hemodialysis Children: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

Chronic inflammation is present in a high proportion of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population, which can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Moreover, it is known as the leading cause of death in these patients. In addition, change in glucose metabolism is another common problem among CKD population. In this regard, it was found that insulin resistance and inflammation can perpetuate each other and simultaneously cause atherosclerosis. Because some studies have previously shown the positive effects of L-carnitine on reducing inflammation and controlling blood sugar, in the present study, we examined the effects of L-carnitine supplementation on serum inflammatory markers, fasting blood sugar (FBS), free carnitine (FC), albumin levels, and quality of life score among children on hemodialysis.

METHOD

Twenty-four children on hemodialysis (aged between 6 and 18 years) were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial study. Thereafter, 12 patients received 50 mg/kg of L-carnitine and 12 patients received placebo for a 10-week period. Afterward, we determined serum FC, interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, FBS, and albumin and Pediatrics Quality of Life scores once at the baseline and once after performing intervention for 10 weeks. Moreover, the one-way repeated measures analysis was used to evaluate the effects of L-carnitine supplementation.

RESULTS

Although oral L-carnitine supplementation led to the decreased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, this change was not significant compared with the placebo. Also, L-carnitine supplementation has significantly reduced serum levels of IL-6 and FBS, which has also raised serum FC and Pediatrics Quality of Life scores compared with the placebo. Notably, no significant change was observed in serum albumin levels.

CONCLUSION

Given the significant reductions in IL-6 and FBS levels, L-carnitine supplementation appeared to have some positive effects on the inflammation, blood glucose control, and prevention of cardiovascular events in these patients, as well as the improvement of quality of life. In this regard, L-carnitine therapy with a longer duration is recommended to obtain more effective results.

Significance of Levocarnitine Treatment in Dialysis Patients

Carnitine is a naturally occurring amino acid derivative that is involved in the transport of long-chain fatty acids to the mitochondrial matrix. There, these substrates undergo β-oxidation, producing energy. The major sources of carnitine are dietary intake, although carnitine is also endogenously synthesized in the liver and kidney. However, in patients on dialysis, serum carnitine levels progressively fall due to restricted dietary intake and deprivation of endogenous synthesis in the kidney. Furthermore, serum-free carnitine is removed by hemodialysis treatment because the molecular weight of carnitine is small (161 Da) and its protein binding rates are very low. Therefore, the dialysis procedure is a major cause of carnitine deficiency in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This deficiency may contribute to several clinical disorders in such patients. Symptoms of dialysis-related carnitine deficiency include erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-resistant anemia, myopathy, muscle weakness, and intradialytic muscle cramps and hypotension. However, levocarnitine administration might replenish the free carnitine and help to increase carnitine levels in muscle. This article reviews the previous research into levocarnitine therapy in patients on maintenance dialysis for the treatment of renal anemia, cardiac dysfunction, dyslipidemia, and muscle and dialytic symptoms, and it examines the efficacy of the therapeutic approach and related issues.

The Effect of Synbiotic and Probiotic Supplementation on Mental Health Parameters in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Introduction

The purpose of this double-blind clinical trial, was to examine the effect of supplementation with the synbiotic and probiotic on the mental health, quality of life, and anemia in HD patients.

Methods

Seventy-five HD patients were randomly assigned to receive the synbiotic (n = 23) as 15 g of prebiotics, 5 g of probiotic powder containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Bifidobacterium longum (2.7 × 107 CFU/g each); probiotics (n = 23) as 5 g probiotics similar to the synbiotic group with 15 g of maltodextrin as placebo; and placebo (n = 19) as 20 g of maltodextrin. Serum hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin (Alb) were measured. Beck depression and anxiety index (BDI/BAI) was used to assess symptoms of depression and anxiety. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the questionnaire SF-36.

Results

From baseline to 12 weeks, synbiotic and probiotic supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in BDI and BAI score in comparison to the placebo (P < 0.05). Between and intergroup comparison showed no significant changes between the groups in terms of HRQoL. However, the serum Hb level increased significantly in the synbiotic and probiotic group compared to the placebo group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Overall, 12 weeks of synbiotic and probiotic supplementation resulted in an improvement in mental health and anemia compared with the placebo, whereas they failed to enhance the quality of life in HD patients.

Antioxidant Supplementation in Renal Replacement Therapy Patients: Is There Evidence?

The disruption of balance between production of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant systems in favor of the oxidants is termed oxidative stress (OS). To counteract the damaging effects of prooxidant free radicals, all aerobic organisms have antioxidant defense mechanisms that are aimed at neutralizing the circulating oxidants and repair the resulting injuries. Antioxidants are either endogenous (the natural defense mechanisms produced by the human body) or exogenous, found in supplements and foods. OS is present at the early stages of chronic kidney disease, augments progressively with renal function deterioration, and is further exacerbated by renal replacement therapy. End-stage renal disease patients, on hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), suffer from accelerated OS, which has been associated with increased risk for mortality and cardiovascular disease. During HD sessions, the bioincompatibility of dialyzers and dialysate trigger activation of white blood cells and formation of free radicals, while a significant loss of antioxidants is also present. In PD, the bioincompatibility of solutions, including high osmolality, elevated lactate levels, low pH, and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products trigger formation of prooxidants, while there is significant loss of vitamins in the ultrafiltrate. A number of exogenous antioxidants have been suggested to ameliorate OS in dialysis patients. Vitamins B, C, D, and E, coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, a-lipoic acid, curcumin, green tea, flavonoids, polyphenols, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, statins, trace elements, and N-acetylcysteine have been studied as exogenous antioxidant supplements in both PD and HD patients.

Effects of Carnitine on Nutritional Parameters in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Protein energy malnutrition is a common problem in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Scattered reports indicate that supplementation of Carnitine may improve patients' clinical symptoms, with significant improvement in nutritional parameters. This systematic review was done to document the evidences of Carnitine effects in nutritional status of CKD patients. Peer-reviewed RCTs on Carnitine administration at any dose in CKD patients with at least four weeks of follow-up were including in the meta-analysis. Online databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus) were searched to October 2017 using selected MeSH terms related to the study topic. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers using a standard form and then cross-checked. Statistical analyses were carried out with Comprehensive Meta-analysis software. Data are presented as standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). According to the predefined criteria, a total of 14 randomized controlled clinical trials were included and screened for data extraction by two reviewers, separately. The preliminary results extracted from meta-analysis have shown that Carnitine can significantly increase the levels of albumin (SMD: -0.861; 95% CI: -1.321, -0.402), total protein (SMD: -0.418; 95% CI: -0.695, -0.141), total cholesterol (SMD: -0.350; 95% CI: -0.564, -0.135), LDL cholesterol (SMD: -0.362; 95% CI: -0.551, -0.173), transferrin (SMD: -1.465; 95% CI: -1.822, -1.108), and hemoglobin (SMD: -0.525; 95% CI: -0.732, -0.318); however there were no conclusive effects of Carnitine on body weight (SMD: -0.057; 95% CI: -0.404, 0.291) and BMI (SMD: -0.567; 95% CI: -1.548, 0.415), in pooled analyses. The results of this meta-analysis showed that there are considerable useful pieces of evidence so far about the effect of Carnitine on nutritional factors; however, there is still doubt about some evidences with this regard. It seems necessary to carry out clinical trials with stronger designs to evaluate the impact of these primary outcomes on the patients' clinical conditions. Having this evidences, the potential role of Carnitine in improving malnutrition consequences in CKD patients would be clearly defined.

Levocarnitine and Dialysis: A Review

Among the various metabolic abnormalities documented in dialysis patients are abnormalities related to the metabolism of fatty acids. Aberrant fatty-acid metabolism has been associated with the promotion of free-radical production, insulin resistance, and cellular apoptosis. These processes have been identified as important contributors to the morbidity experienced by dialysis patients. There is evidence that levocarnitine supplementation can modify the deleterious effects of defective fatty-acid metabolism. Patients receiving hemodialysis and, to a lesser degree, peritoneal dialysis have been shown to be carnitine deficient, as manifested by reduced levels of plasma free carnitine and an increase in the acyl:free carnitine ratio. Cardiac and skeletal muscles are particularly dependent on fatty-acid metabolism for the generation of energy. A number of clinical abnormalities have been correlated with a low plasma carnitine status in dialysis patients. Clinical trials have examined the efficacy of levocarnitine therapy in a number of conditions common in dialysis patients, including skeletal-muscle weakness and fatigue, cardiomyopathy, dialysis-related hypotension, hyperlipidemia, and anemia poorly responsive to recombinant human erythropoietin therapy (rHuEPO). This review examines the evidence for carnitine deficiency in patients requiring dialysis, and documents the results of relevant clinical trials of levocarnitine therapy in this population. Consensus recommendations by expert panels are summarized and contrasted with present guidelines for access to levocarnitine therapy by dialysis patients.

Carnitine Treatment Improved Quality-of-Life Measure in a Sample of Midwestern Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Previously, we demonstrated that selected groups of hemodialysis patients might be more likely to have abnormalities of carnitine metabolism. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of carnitine therapy in these selected groups of hemodialysis patients on quality-of-life measures and erythropoietin dose.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, in which 50 hemodialysis patients were treated with either 2 g i.v. carnitine or placebo. The treatment period was for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (15 in the treatment group) completed the study. The mean age was 69 +/- 15 years, 35% were women, and 44% had diabetes. Mean initial plasma total, free, short-chain acyl and long-chain acyl carnitine concentrations (micromol/L; mean +/- SEM) were 35.9 +/- 1.8, 18.2 +/- 1.1, 11.6 +/- 0.6, and 6.0 +/- 0.3, whereas the plasma acyl-to-free-carnitine ratio was 1.02 +/- 0.05. With respect to the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 (SF-36), improvements from baseline were noted in the treatment group (n = 13) for role-physical (33.9 +/- 1.9 to 43.2 +/- 3.0, p < .05) and the SF-36 physical component summary score (36.1 +/- 2.7 to 39.7 +/- 2.3, p = .09) relative to changes in the control group (n = 14). The erythropoietin dose over the 24-week period was reduced from baseline in the treatment group relative to the placebo group (-1.62 +/- 0.91 vs 1.33 +/- 0.79 units erythropoietin/dry weight/hemoglobin concentration, respectively, p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

After 24 weeks of i.v. carnitine therapy, SF-36 scores were improved and erythropoietin doses were reduced in hemodialysis patients, relative to the control group.

L-Carnitine supplementation for adults with end-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis indicated that l-carnitine significantly increased hemoglobin and decreased the required erythropoietin dose in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to reevaluate effects of l-carnitine.

DESIGN

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases (31 December 2012) were searched to identify RCTs that investigated effects of l-carnitine in adults with end-stage kidney disease that required maintenance hemodialysis.

RESULTS

Forty-nine RCTs (1734 participants) were included. l-Carnitine significantly decreased serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (mean difference: -5.82 mg/dL; 95% CI: -11.61, -0.04 mg/dL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (-3.65 mg/L; -6.19, -1.12 mg/L). There were no significant differences in triglycerides (-0.89 mg/dL; -29.32, 27.53 mg/dL), cholesterol (0.14 mg/dL; -6.15, 6.42 mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein (1.13 mg/dL; -2.44, 4.70 mg/dL), hemoglobin (0.68 g/dL; 0.14, 1.50 g/dL), hematocrit (2.04%; -1.39, 5.48%), albumin (1.65 g/L; -0.22, 3.51 g/L), or the required erythropoietin dose (-0.76 KU/wk; -1.75, 0.23 KU/wk). No adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis failed to confirm the previous findings regarding the effects of l-carnitine on hemoglobin and the erythropoietin dose but showed that l-carnitine significantly decreased serum LDL and CRP. The extent of the decrease in LDL was not clinically relevant, whereas the significant decrease in CRP was both statistically and clinically relevant. However, the relevance of decrease in CRP with hard endpoints such as all-cause mortality and cardiovascular complications still remains to be clarified.

Effects of Oral L-Carnitine Supplementation on Lipid Profile, Anemia, and Quality of Life in Chronic Renal Disease Patients under Hemodialysis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

In patients on maintenance hemodialysis several factors reduce the body stored carnitine which could lead to dyslipidemia, anemia, and general health in these patients. We evaluated the effect of oral L-carnitine supplementation on lipid profiles, anemia, and quality of life (QOL) in hemodialysis patients. In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis received either L-carnitine 1 g/d (n = 24) or placebo (27 patients) for 16 weeks. At the end of the study, there was a significant decrease in triglyceride (-31.1 ± 38.7 mg/dL, P = 0.001) and a significant increase in HDL (3.7 ± 2.8 mg/dL, P < 0.001) levels in the carnitine group. Decrease in total cholesterol (-6.6 ± 16.0 mg/dL, P = 0.075) and increase in hemoglobin (0.7 ± 1.7 g/dL, P = 0.081) concentrations in the carnitine group were not significant. There was no statistically significant changes in LDL in any group (P > 0.05). Erythropoietin dose was significantly decreased in both the carnitine (-4750 ± 5772 mg, P = 0.001) and the placebo group (-2000 ± 4296 mg, P < 0.05). No improvement was observed in QOL scores of two groups. In ESRD patients under maintenance hemodialysis, oral L-carnitine supplementation may reduce triglyceride and cholesterol and increase HDL and hemoglobin and subsequently reduce needed erythropoietin dose without effect on QOL.

Biomarkers and health-related quality of life in end-stage renal disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) predicts mortality in ESRD, yet adoption of HRQOL monitoring is not widespread, and regulatory authorities remain predominantly concerned with monitoring traditional biologic parameters. To assist with future efforts to adopt HRQOL monitoring while acknowledging the importance of biomarkers, this study sought to establish which domains of HRQOL are most affected by ESRD and to measure the strength of evidence linking common biomarkers to HRQOL in ESRD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies that measured HRQOL in ESRD. Data were abstracted according to a conceptual model regarding the measurement of HRQOL differences, and HRQOL data were converted to weighted mean effect sizes and correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The impact of ESRD was largest in the Short Form 36 domains of physical functioning (e.g., role-physical, vitality) and smallest in mental functioning (e.g., mental health, role-emotional). Dialysis adequacy, as measured by Kt/V, was a poor correlate for Short Form 36 scores. Similarly, mineral metabolism (e.g., calcium x phosphorous, parathyroid hormone) and inflammatory (e.g., C-reactive protein, TNF) biomarkers had small effect sizes and correlations with HRQOL. In contrast, hematocrit demonstrated small to moderate relationships with mental and physical HRQOL, and nutritional biomarkers (e.g., albumin, creatinine, body mass index) demonstrated moderate to large relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQOL in ESRD is most affected in the physical domains, and nutritional biomarkers are most closely associated with these domains. In contrast, Kt/V, mineral metabolism indices, and inflammatory markers are poor HRQOL correlates.

L-carnitine supplementation in the dialysis population: are Australian patients missing out?

It has been widely established that patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic haemodialysis therapy exhibit low endogenous levels of L-carnitine and elevated acylcarnitine levels; however, the clinical implication of this altered carnitine profile is not as clear. It has been suggested that these disturbances in carnitine homeostasis may be associated with a number of clinical problems common in this patient population, including erythropoietin-resistant anaemia, cardiac dysfunction, and dialytic complications such as hypotension, cramps and fatigue. In January 2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (USA) implemented coverage of intravenous L-carnitine for the treatment of erythropoietin-resistant anaemia and/or intradialytic hypotension in patients with low endogenous L-carnitine concentrations. It has been estimated that in the period of 1998-2003, 3.8-7.2% of all haemodialysis patients in the USA received at least one dose of L-carnitine, with 2.7-5.2% of patients receiving at least 3 months of supplementation for one or both of these conditions. The use of L-carnitine within Australia is virtually non-existent, which leads us to the question: Are Australian haemodialysis patients missing out? This review examines the previous research associated with L-carnitine administration to chronic dialysis patients for the treatment of anaemia, cardiac dysfunction, dyslipidaemia and/or dialytic symptoms, and discusses whether supplementation is warranted within the Australian setting.

Health-related quality of life in the era of erythropoietin

Patients with end-stage renal disease treated with maintenance hemodialysis suffer substantial impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Despite widespread efforts, there are few interventions that improve the overall well-being and quality of life of this patient population. The current review provides a description of HRQOL as an essential, yet arguably overlooked health-related domain in hemodialysis patients, and discusses interventions that have been evaluated to improve the functional status and well-being of this population, with a particular focus on therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin. We review the controversy surrounding recombinant human erythropoietin as it relates to HRQOL, and describe the delicate balance faced by renal providers who seek to reduce hemodialysis patients' morbidity and mortality while simultaneously striving to improve patients' HRQOL.

Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) is the most widely used generic instrument to estimate quality of life of patients on renal replacement therapy. Purpose of this study was to summarize and compare the published literature on quality of life of hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and renal transplant (RTx) patients.

METHODS

We used random-effects regression analyses to compare the SF-36 scores across treatment groups and adjusted this comparison for age and prevalence of diabetes using random-effects meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

We found 52 articles that met the inclusion criteria, reporting quality of life of 36,582 patients. The unadjusted scores of all SF-36 health dimensions were not significantly different between HD and PD patients, but the scores of RTx patients were higher than those of dialysis patients, except for the dimensions Mental Health and Bodily Pain. Point differences between dialysis and RTx patients varied from 2 to 32. With adjustment for age and diabetes, the differences became smaller (point difference 2-22). The significance of the differences of both dialysis groups compared with RTx recipients disappeared for the dimensions Vitality and Social Functioning. The significance of the differences between HD and RTx patients disappeared on the dimensions Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Bodily Pain.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that dialysis patients have a lower quality of life than RTx patients, but this difference can partly be explained by differences in age and prevalence of diabetes.

Dialysis-related carnitine disorder

L-carnitine plays an essential role in the beta-oxidation of fatty acids by catalyzing their transport into the mitochondrial matrix. The kidney maintains plasma free L-carnitine levels in the homeostatic range by selective saturable tubular reabsorption. The preferential retention of free L-carnitine over acyl-L-carnitines by the kidney is lost in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Loss of renal parenchyma as a site of carnitine synthesis, as well as nonselective clearance of L-carnitine by the dialysis procedure lead to dialysis-related carnitine deficiency. Numerous studies investigating whether L-carnitine supplementation will alleviate several dialysis-related symptoms, such as intradialytic hypotension, heart failure, muscle weakness, low exercise capacity, and anemia, have reported conflicting results. Many of these studies suffer from a lack of randomization and control groups, heterogeneity in the administration of L-carnitine, and nonstandardized measures of symptom improvement. More data exist to support the use of L-carnitine in selected anemic dialysis patients with very large erythropoietin requirements in whom extensive examination for reversible causes of anemia was unrevealing.

Serum carnitine concentrations correlated to clinical outcome parameters in chronic hemodialysis patients

Carnitine metabolism and the therapeutic use of carnitine has been a major area of interest in dialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether any correlations exist between carnitine status and selected clinical parameters in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study was an observational study of data from patients receiving HD at a Midwest dialysis center. The subjects (n=49) were 60+/-16 (mean+/-SD) years of age and 48% male. Fifteen percent of the subjects had type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 29% had type 2 DM, and 25% had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The serum-free and total carnitine, and acylcarnitine concentrations were: 40.3+11.8 microm/l, 22.8+/-7.3, and 17.5+/-5.9 microm/l, respectively. The serum acylcarnitine to free carnitine ratio (A/F) was 0.80+/-0.27. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), parathyroid hormone and ejection fraction were positively correlated and age and left atrial dilation (cm) were negatively correlated with serum total carnitine (P<0.05). BUN and hematocrit were positively correlated (P<0.05) and age was negatively correlated with free carnitine. Subjects who used mannitol or were male had significantly higher concentrations of both free and total carnitine, respectively (P<0.05). Subjects using aspirin had lower concentrations of serum total carnitine (P<0.10). These results suggest certain subgroups of patients may need to be targeted for further studies with carnitine replacement therapy, i.e. long-term patients, older patients, patients with left verticular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement, females and patients on aspirin therapy.

A review of the impact of L-carnitine therapy on patient functionality in maintenance hemodialysis

Goals of maintenance hemodialysis therapy include not only the preservation of an individual patient's life in the presence of kidney failure, but also restoration of optimal quality of life. Although many conceptual and method problems are associated with the definition and assessment of quality of life in the chronically ill, there is broad agreement that patient quality of life is related to physical function and well-being. Evidence exists that despite advances in dialysis therapy, a high percentage of patients on maintenance dialysis therapy report chronic psychological symptoms, impaired activities of daily living and social function, and incomplete occupational rehabilitation that impair their functionality. This article reviews the impact of L-carnitine therapy on several dimensions of functionality in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Association of nutritional markers with physical and mental health status in prevalent hemodialysis patients from the HEMO study

OBJECTIVE

To determine associations of potentially modifiable nutritional factors with physical and mental health status after adjusting for sociodemographic and comorbid conditions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional multivariable analysis.

SETTING

Fifteen dialysis centers across the United States participating in the Reduction of Morbidity and Mortality Among Hemodialysis Patients (HEMO) study.

PATIENTS

Enrollment of 1,545 prevalent hemodialysis subjects in the HEMO study. INDEPENDENT (PREDICTOR) VARIABLES: The following nutritional markers were assessed in this analysis: serum albumin, energy intake, protein catabolic rate, serum creatinine, midarm muscle circumference, calf circumference, and smoking status. Smoking status, although not a nutritional factor per se, was also included because it is a modifiable lifestyle factor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physical and mental health status were assessed using the medical staff-assessed Karnofsky Index and the patient self-assessed Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

After adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbid conditions, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and calf circumference were independently associated with Karnofsky Index scores. Similarly, serum creatinine and calf circumference were also independently associated with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the SF-36. Of the nutritional variables selected, no variables were significantly associated with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score of the SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers of poor nutrition were associated with decreased physical functioning scores, independent of case mix. Measures that improve nutrition may therefore have wide-reaching effects to improve not only morbidity and mortality but also health-related quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease.

Effects of L-carnitine supplementation in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a systematic review

There are many causes for carnitine depletion during maintenance hemodialysis. Supplementation with L-carnitine in animals has been associated with improvement in some abnormalities also present in chronic renal failure. However, it is still controversial whether restoring plasma or tissue carnitine will correct clinical or biologic symptoms observed in maintenance hemodialysis. A systematic review is here performed to determine the effects of L-carnitine in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Eighty-three prospective trials were identified from 1978 to 1999 in which L-carnitine was randomly allocated in 21 trials. Change in serum triglycerides, cholesterol fractions, hemoglobin levels, erythropoietin dose, and other symptoms (muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life) were examined. A total of 482 patients in 18 trials were considered for analysis. There was no effect of L-carnitine on triglycerides, total cholesterol, or any of its fractions. Before the erythropoietin (EPO) era, L-carnitine treatment was associated with improved hemoglobin (P < 0.01) and with a decreased EPO dose (P < 0.01) and improved resistance to EPO when patients routinely received EPO. Muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life could not be reliably assessed because of the noncombinable nature of end points and the limited number of trials. In conclusion, L-carnitine cannot be recommended for treating the dyslipidemia of maintenance hemodialysis patients. By contrast, this review suggests a promising effect of L-carnitine on anemia management. The route of L-carnitine administration should be evaluated because there is no evidence as to the most efficient method of administration in maintenance hemodialysis.

Intravenous L-carnitine increases plasma carnitine, reduces fatigue, and may preserve exercise capacity in hemodialysis patients

Exercise capacity in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains impaired despite correction of anemia. Carnitine insufficiency may contribute to impaired exercise and functional capacities in patients with ESRD. Two randomized placebo-controlled trials were conducted to test whether intravenous L-carnitine improves exercise capacity (assessed by maximal rate of oxygen consumption [VO(2max)]) and quality of life (measured by the Kidney Disease Questionnaire [KDQ]) in patients with ESRD. In study A, patients were administered L-carnitine, 20 mg/kg (n = 28), or placebo (n = 28) intravenously at the conclusion of each thrice-weekly dialysis session for 24 weeks. In study B, a dose-ranging study, patients were administered intravenous L-carnitine, 10 mg/kg (n = 32), 20 mg/kg (n = 30), or 40 mg/kg (n = 32), or placebo (n = 33) as in study A. The prospective primary statistical analysis evaluated changes in VO(2max) in each study and specified that changes in the KDQ were assessed only in the combined populations. L-Carnitine supplementation increased plasma carnitine concentrations, but did not affect VO(2max) in either study. Because change in VO(2max) showed significant heterogeneity, a secondary analysis using a mixture of linear models approach on the combined study populations was performed. L-Carnitine therapy (combined all doses) was associated with a statistically significant smaller deterioration in VO(2max) (-0.88 +/- 0.26 versus -0.05 +/- 0.19 mL/kg/min, placebo versus L-carnitine, respectively; P = 0.009). L-Carnitine significantly improved the fatigue domain of the KDQ after 12 (P = 0.01) and 24 weeks (P = 0.03) of treatment compared with placebo using the primary analysis but did not significantly affect the total score (P = 0.10) or other domains of the instrument (P > 0.11). Carnitine was well tolerated, and no drug-related adverse effects were identified. Intravenous L-carnitine treatment increased plasma carnitine concentrations, improved patient-assessed fatigue, and may prevent the decline in peak exercise capacity in hemodialysis patients. VO(2max) in the primary analysis and other assessed end points were unaffected by carnitine therapy.

L-carnitine in dialysis patients

Hemodialysis (HD) patients often have low serum concentrations of free L-carnitine and decreased skeletal muscle stores. As L-carnitine is an essential cofactor in fatty acid and energy metabolism, it is possible that abnormal carnitine metabolism in dialysis patients may be associated with clinical problems such as skeletal myopathies, intradialytic symptoms, reduced cardiac function, and anemia. Studies have shown that L-carnitine supplementation in HD patients improves several complications seen in dialysis patients, including cardiac complications (arrhythmias, reduced output, low cardiothoracic ratio), limitation of exercise capacity, increased intradialytic hypotension, and muscle symptoms. The most promising results have been noted in the treatment of erythropoietin-resistant anemia. Routine administration of L-carnitine to all dialysis patients is not recommended at this time; however, a therapeutic trial of L-carnitine can be useful in symptomatic patients with certain clinical features unresponsive to the usual measures. These include intradialytic muscle cramps and hypotension, asthenia, cardiomyopathy, lowered ejection fraction, muscle weakness or myopathy, reduced oxygen consumption, and anemia requiring large doses of EPO.

Effects of L-carnitine on leukocyte function and viability in hemodialysis patients: A double-blind randomized trial

Excess morbidity and mortality among long-term hemodialysis patients because of infectious complications is partly caused by an impairment of cellular immune defense. We hypothesized this impairment is related to an abnormal carnitine metabolism also present in these patients. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the effect of L-carnitine on phagocytic function and viability of blood leukocytes in 17 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. After an observation period of 1 month, the patients received either 10 mg/kg of L-carnitine or placebo intravenously at the end of each hemodialysis session over a period of 4 months. Leukocyte oxidative metabolism was measured by means of luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence and superoxide generation after stimulation with Staphylococcus aureus or phorbol myristate acetate. Killing capacity and phagocytosis of radiolabeled staphylococci were determined. A lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release test was applied to assess cell viability. We were unable to show an effect of L-carnitine on phagocytic function and viability in vivo. Several clinical parameters were observed during the trial. No statistically significant differences concerning dialysis-related morbidity, anemia, or reduction of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels were detected. Additionally, we tested the effect of L-carnitine on phagocytic function after in vitro incubation of blood leukocytes, which also showed no changes. LDH release was decreased, indicating an improved viability of these cells. The latter results were found after in vitro incubation of cells, but could not be confirmed in vivo. In summary, we could not show beneficial effects of L-carnitine administration in hemodialysis patients for the dosage and duration of treatment stated, either on phagocytic function and viability or on the clinical and biochemical parameters observed.

Identification of factors responsible for postdialysis fatigue

Ultrafiltration, diffusion, osmotic shifts, blood-membrane interactions, and psychological factors have all been implicated in the pathogenesis of postdialysis fatigue (PDF). To identify responsible factors, we performed a prospective, randomized, crossover analysis of fatigue scores (scale, 0 to 4) in 12 maintenance hemodialysis subjects with PDF. Fatigue scores were evaluated on nondialysis days (baseline) and after the following procedures on midweek treatment days: standard dialysis using either a 135- to 140-mEq/L sodium bath (routine hemodialysis) or a 150- to 155-mEq/L sodium bath (hypernatric hemodialysis); isolated ultrafiltration; isolated diffusion; and sham procedures with (isolated membrane) or without (recirculation) exposure to a dialysis membrane. Maximal fatigue scores are expressed as mean and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The highest scores were recorded by patients who had just undergone routine hemodialysis (mean score, 2. 6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.4), isolated ultrafiltration (mean score, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.9), and isolated diffusion (mean score, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.2). There were no significant differences in fatigue scores between baseline periods and isolated membrane and recirculation procedures (mean score, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.2). Fatigue scores after hypernatric hemodialysis occupied an intermediate position (mean score, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6). These results suggest that rapid hydraulic and molecular flux have a greater role in the pathogenesis of PDF than psychological stress and blood-membrane interactions. Use of a high-sodium bath may ameliorate PDF. We conclude that appropriate adjustments in both ultrafiltration and sodium profiling remain the most important means for controlling PDF in patients on short-duration hemodialysis.

Haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: metabolic alterations and nutritional status

In dialysis patients, malnutrition is an independent factor causing morbidity and mortality. Both inadequate alimentation and metabolic alterations, which involve nitrogen and energy metabolism, contribute to malnutrition. Future research must address the treatment of anorexia and inflammation-induced catabolism, as well as the evaluation of nutritional supplementation techniques and anabolic drugs.