Drug metabolism and drug interactions in the elderly

Chronic polypharmacy, monotherapy, and deprescribing: Understanding complex effects on the hepatic proteome of aging mice

Polypharmacy (use of ≥5 concurrent medications) is highly prevalent among older adults to manage chronic diseases and is linked to adverse geriatric outcomes, including physical and cognitive functional impairments, falls, frailty, hospitalization, and mortality. Deprescribing (withdrawal) is a potential strategy to manage polypharmacy. The broad molecular changes by which polypharmacy causes harm and deprescribing may be beneficial are unknown and unfeasible to study rigorously in tissue from geriatric patients. Therefore, in a randomized controlled trial, we administered therapeutic doses of commonly used chronic medications (oxycodone, oxybutynin, citalopram, simvastatin, or metoprolol) as monotherapy or concurrently (polypharmacy) from middle-age (12 months) to old-age (26 months) to male C57BL/6J (B6) mice and deprescribed (gradually withdrew) treatments in a subset from age 21 months. We compared drug-related hepatic effects by applying proteomics along with transcriptomics and histology. We found that monotherapy effects on hepatic proteomics were limited but significant changes were seen with polypharmacy (93% unique to polypharmacy). Polypharmacy altered the hepatic expression of proteins involved in immunity, and in drug, cholesterol, and amino acid metabolism, accompanied by higher serum drug levels than monotherapies. Deprescribing not only reversed some effects but also caused irreversible and novel changes in the hepatic proteome. Furthermore, our study identified several hepatic protein co-expressed modules that are associated with clinically relevant adverse geriatric outcomes, such as mobility, frailty, and activities of daily living. This study highlights the complex molecular changes following aging, chronic polypharmacy, and deprescribing. Further exploration of these mechanistic pathways may inform management of polypharmacy and deprescribing in older adults.

Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Combinations for Pain in Older Adults

Pain is common in older adults and managing pain in this population can be challenging owing to altered pharmacokinetics, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, and physical frailty. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) analgesic contains two or more pharmaceutical ingredients in a single pill and may offer more benefits when compared with loose-dose formulations. The benefits include reduced pill burden and better adherence, a broader analgesic spectrum well-suited to multimechanistic pain conditions and more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. These advantages may outweigh disadvantages such as reduced flexibility in dose adjustment. Most of the commonly used FDC analgesics are made up of a combination of paracetamol, muscle relaxant, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or opioid. They have been shown to have better efficacy and similar safety profiles compared with individual drugs. Adverse effects from the use of FDC analgesics in older patients were comparable with that observed in younger populations. With proper patient selection and continuous surveillance, FDC analgesics will likely benefit older adults by simplifying dosing regimen and improving compliance.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: A clinical perspective

In the past decade, numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been introduced in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Given the significant interpatient variability in TKIs pharmacokinetics, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can greatly impact patient therapy. This review aims to discuss the pharmacokinetic characteristics of TKIs, specifically focusing on their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles. Additionally, it provides a comprehensive overview of the utilization of TKIs in special populations such as the elderly, children, and patients with liver or kidney dysfunction. We also highlight known or suspected DDIs between TKIs and other drugs, highlighting various clinically relevant interactions. Moreover, specific recommendations are provided to guide haemato-oncologists, oncologists, and clinical pharmacists in managing DDIs during TKI treatment in daily clinical practice.

Drug-induced liver injury: a comprehensive review

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge in clinical practice and is still a diagnosis of exclusion. Although it has a low incidence amongst the general population, DILI accounts for most cases of acute liver failure with a fatality rate of up to 50%. While multiple mechanisms of DILI have been postulated, there is no clear causal relationship between drugs, risk factors and mechanisms of DILI. Current best practice relies on a combination of high clinical suspicion, thorough clinical history of risk factors and timeline, and extensive hepatological investigations as supported by the international Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method criteria, the latter considered a key diagnostic algorithm for DILI. This review focuses on DILI classification, risk factors, clinical evaluation, future biomarkers and management, with the aim of facilitating physicians to correctly identify DILI early in presentation.

Hepatic drug metabolism in older people with body composition changes

AIM

Dosage adjustment is essential in older individuals because they are prone to experience a decline in liver function and changes in body composition. However, quantitative tests or equations for evaluating the activity of hepatic drug metabolism have not yet been clearly established. We examined hepatic drug metabolism activities in older individuals, focusing on changes in body composition parameters.

METHODS

Lansoprazole and nifedipine, substrates of the metabolic enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and 3A4, respectively, were selected to study hepatic drug metabolism. Residual samples from blood test for older patients were evaluated to determine drug metabolism. The body composition of relevant patients was determined by analyzing characteristic parameters of skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), handgrip strength (HGS) and hepatic steatosis index (HSI). The differences in hepatic drug metabolism were studied statistically among categories in terms of the cut-off value of these parameters.

RESULTS

Older male patients receiving lansoprazole and nifedipine in the low SMI (<7.0 kg/m² ) category showed an 85-90% reduction in respective CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 metabolic activities compared with the normal SMI category. For the female patients, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 metabolic activities showed no significant correlation with SMI and HGS. Fatty liver disease (HSI ≥36) was found to reduce CYP2C19 metabolic activity particularly in older female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Low CYP2C19 metabolic activity was statistically correlated with low SMI in male patients and high HSI in female patients, whereas low CYP3A4 metabolic activity was statistically correlated with low HGS in male patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 449-454.

Pharmacokinetic determinants for the right dose of antiarrhythmic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) show a narrow therapeutic range and marked intersubject variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), which may lead to inappropriate dosing and drug toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of the present review is to describe PK properties of AADs, discussing the main changes in different clinical scenarios, such as the elderly and patients with obese, chronic kidney, liver, and cardiac disease, in order to guide their right prescription in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

There are few data about PK properties of AADs in a special population or challenging clinical setting. The use and dose of AADs is commonly based on physicians' clinical experience observing the clinical effects rather than being personalized on the individual patients PK profiles. More and updated studies are needed to validate a patient centered approach in the pharmacological treatment of arrhythmias based on patients' clinical features, including pharmacogenomics, and AAD pharmacokinetics.

CYP3A7, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms in recipients rather than donors influence tacrolimus concentrations in the early stages after liver transplantation

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of CYP3A7, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms in liver transplant recipients and donors on tacrolimus concentrations in the early stages after liver transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-eight liver transplant recipients and matched donors were genotyped for CYP3A7 (rs10211 and rs2257401), CYP3A4 (rs4646437 and rs2242480), and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) polymorphisms. The relationships between dose-adjusted trough concentrations (C₀/D) of tacrolimus and corresponding genotypes were investigated.

RESULTS

Recipient CYP3A polymorphisms were associated with tacrolimus concentrations. The CYP3A7 rs10211 AA carriers (186.2 vs 90.5, p < 0.001), CYP3A4 rs4646437 CC carriers (184.0 vs 88.8, p < 0.001), CYP3A4*1G rs2242480 CC carriers (189.8 vs 99.7, p < 0.001), and CYP3A5*3 rs776746 GG carriers (197.3 vs 86.0, p < 0.001) had an almost twofold increase in the tacrolimus C₀/D compared to that of the non-carriers. We further investigated the effect of the combination of recipient (intestinal) and donor (hepatic) genotypes on tacrolimus concentrations. Regardless of the genotype of the matched donor, CYP3A7 rs10211, CYP3A4*1G (rs2242480), and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) polymorphisms of recipients could affect tacrolimus concentrations. For the CYP3A4 rs4646437 polymorphisms, when the donor carried CYP3A4 rs4646437 CC, the recipient CYP3A4 rs4646437 polymorphism was associated with the C₀/D of tacrolimus, and when the donor carried CYP3A4 rs4646437 CT/TT genotype, the recipient CYP3A4 rs4646437 polymorphism also affected on tacrolimus C₀/D, although the effect was not significant.

CONCLUSION

The large inter-individual variation in tacrolimus concentrations in the early stages after liver transplantation is influenced by genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A7, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5. Recipient (intestinal) CYP3A7, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 polymorphisms seem to contribute more to such variation than donors. Therefore, the detection of CYP3A polymorphisms in recipients could help to predict the tacrolimus starting dose in the early stages after liver transplantation.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights and Controversies in the Recent Literature

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains an important, yet challenging diagnosis for physicians. Each year, additional drugs are implicated in DILI and this year was no different, with more than 1400 articles published on the subject. This review examines some of the most significant highlights and controversies in DILI-related research over the past year and their implications for clinical practice. Several new drugs were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration including a number of drugs implicated in causing DILI, particularly among the chemotherapeutic classes. The COVID-19 pandemic was also a major focus of attention in 2020 and we discuss some of the notable aspects of COVID-19-related liver injury and its implications for diagnosing DILI. Updates in diagnostic and causality assessments related to DILI such as the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method are included, mindful that there is still no single biomarker or diagnostic tool to unequivocally diagnose DILI. Glutamate dehydrogenase received renewed attention as being more specific than alanine aminotransferase. There were a few new reports of previously unrecognized hepatotoxins, including immune modulators and novel gene therapy drugs that we highlight. Updates and new developments of previously described hepatotoxins, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-tuberculosis drugs are reviewed. Finally, novel technologies such as organoid culture systems to better predict DILI preclinically may be coming of age and determinants of hepatocyte loss, such as calculating P_ALT are poised to improve our current means of estimating DILI severity and the risk of acute liver failure.

Drug Induced Liver Injury in Geriatric Patients Detected by a Two-Hospital Prospective Pharmacovigilance Program: A Comprehensive Analysis Using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method

Background/aim: A prospective evaluation of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in two tertiary hospitals was conducted through a pharmacovigilance program from laboratory signals at hospital (PPLSH) to determine the principal characteristics of DILI in patients older than 65 years, a growing age group worldwide, which is underrepresented in the literature on DILI.

Methods: All DILI in patients older than 65 years detected by PPLSH in two hospitals were followed up for 8 years in the La Paz Hospital and 2 years in the Getafe Hospital. A descriptive analysis was conducted that determined the causality of DILI and suspected drugs, the incidence of DILI morbidities, DILI characteristics, laboratory patterns, evolution and outcomes.

Results: 458 DILI cases in 441 patients were identified, 31.0% resulting in hospitalisation and 69.0% developing during hospitalisation. The mean age was 76.61 years old (SD, 7.9), and 54.4% were women. The DILI incidence was 76.33/10,000 admissions (95%CI 60.78–95.13). Polypharmacy (taking >4 drugs) was present in 86.84% of patients, 39.68% of whom took >10 drugs. The hepatocellular phenotype was the most frequent type of DILI (53.29%), a higher proportion (65%) had a mild severity index, and, in 55.2% of the evaluated drugs the RUCAM indicated that the causal relationship was highly probable. The most frequently employed drugs were paracetamol (50-cases), amoxicillin-clavulanate (42-cases) and atorvastatin (37-cases). The incidence rate of in-hospital DILI per 10,000 DDDs was highest for piperacillin-tazobactam (66.96/10,000 DDDs). A higher risk of in-hospital DILI was associated with the therapeutic chemical group-J (antiinfectives for systemic use) (OR, 2.65; 95%CI 1.58–4.46) and group-N (central nervous system drugs) (OR, 2.33; 95%CI 1.26–4.31). The patients taking >4 medications presented higher maximum creatinine level (OR, 2.01; 95%CI 1.28–3.15), and the patients taking >10 medications had a higher use of group J drugs (OR, 2.08; 95%IC 1.31–3.32).

Conclusion: The incidence rate of DILI in the patients older than 65 years was higher than expected. DILI in elderly patients is mild, has a good outcome, has a hepatocellular pattern, develops during hospitalisation, and prolongs the hospital stay. Knowing the DILI incidence and explanatory factors will help improve the therapy of the elderly population.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Analgesic Prescribing in Poly-Medicated Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND

Pain is common in older patients and management guidelines rarely consider the effect of multiple comorbidities and concurrent medications on analgesic selection.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence and pattern of analgesic prescribing and associated factors in older patients with polypharmacy.

METHODS

Older patients (aged ≥ 75 years) admitted to the Royal Adelaide Hospital between September 2015 and August 2016 and with polypharmacy were included and their comorbidities and medications prescribed at discharge were recorded. Drug Burden Index and Charlson Comorbidity Index were calculated. The number of medications that increased the risk of orthostatic hypotension were recorded. Logistic regression was used to compute the association between analgesic use and participant characteristics, and results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Drug Burden Index and orthostatic hypotension.

RESULTS

Over 15,000 admissions were identified, of which 1192 patients were included, 824 (69%) of whom were prescribed an analgesic medication. Paracetamol (used by 89% of analgesic users), opioids (34%) and adjuvants (17%) were used more frequently than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8%). Analgesic users had a higher Drug Burden Index, were prescribed more medications and were less likely to be male compared with non-users. Charlson Comorbidity Index across the cohort was high (7.3 ± 1.9) but there was no difference between analgesic users and non-users, but analgesic users were more likely to have a documented diagnosis of osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and falls. Opioid use was associated with the Drug Burden Index, while adjuvant use was associated with orthostatic hypotension. Opioid use was associated with having a diagnosis of osteoporosis and falls.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of poly-medicated elderly patients, prescription of analgesic medications was common, and these patients are likely to have an increased rate of adverse drug reactions and falls compared with those who were not prescribed analgesic medications.

Avoidability of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in an elderly hospital cohort with cases assessed for causality by the updated RUCAM score

Background

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents an increasing morbidity in the general population, but more so in the elderly cohort of patients. Despite this, the concept of its prevention through prospective analysis has largely remained unexamined. We evaluated the utility of recently validated adverse drug reactions (ADR) avoidability tool in a cohort of elderly patients with DILI.

Methods

We examined 38 DILI-drug pairs from n=38 patients in a prospective cohort of patients presenting with adverse drug reactions to a Weill Cornell-affiliated tertiary hospital between February 2019 and January 2020. DILI outcomes were adjudicated by the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). Two clinical pharmacologists and two general physicians utilized the Liverpool adverse drug reactions avoidability tool (LAAT) and the modified Hallas tools to rate the preventability of DILI-drug pairs. Inter-rater, exact agreement proportions, as well as intraclass correlation coefficients were generated and expressed as ordinal outcomes.

Results

The cases examined for the determination of DILI avoidability had probability likelihood of “probable” or “highly probable” by the updated RUCAM scale. Examination of the 38 DILI-drug pairs (n= 38 patients) resulted in a total of 152 ordinal outcome decisions. We found about 32.3% (50/152) and 34.2% (52/152) of DILI-drug pairs were rated as “avoidable” (“probable” or “definite”) by the LAAT and the modified Hallas tools respectively. The overall median Krippendorf’s kappa with the LAAT was 0.61 (SE 0.12, CI 0.36, 0.85) and for modified Hallas tool was 0.53 (SE 0.18; CI 0.16, 0.89). The inter-rater correlation coefficient (ICC) for the LAAT and modified Hallas were 0.50 [0.32, 0.65] and 0.63 [0.48, 0.76] respectively. Exact pairwise agreement was present in 30/38 (IQR 29.5, 34.5), and 28/38 (IQR 27.5-35.5) of DILI-ADR pairs using the LAAT and modified Hallas tools respectively.

Conclusion

We found a significant proportion of drug-induced liver injury adjudicated by the updated RUCAM scale in elderly hospitalized cohort of patients were avoidable with significant implication for therapeutic commissioning as well as cost effectiveness interventions in this cohort of patients.

Influence of POR*28 Polymorphisms on CYP3A5*3-Associated Variations in Tacrolimus Blood Levels at an Early Stage after Liver Transplantation

It is well known that the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism is an important marker that correlates with the tacrolimus dose requirement after organ transplantation. Recently, it has been revealed that the POR*28 polymorphism affects the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients. In this study, we examined whether POR*28 as well as CYP3A5*3 polymorphism in Japanese recipients and donors would be another biomarker for the variation of tacrolimus blood levels in the recipients during the first month after living-donor liver transplantation. We enrolled 65 patients treated with tacrolimus, who underwent liver transplantation between July 2016 and January 2019. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole-blood samples, and genotyping was performed to examine the presence of CYP3A5*3 and POR*28 polymorphisms in the recipients and donors. The CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (defective CYP3A5) of the recipient (standard partial regression coefficient [median C/D ratio of CYP3A5 expressor vs. CYP3A5 non-expressor, p value]: Pod 1–7, β= −0.389 [1.76 vs. 2.73, p < 0.001]; Pod 8–14, β = −0.345 [2.03 vs. 2.83, p < 0.001]; Pod 15–21, β= −0.417 [1.75 vs. 2.94, p < 0.001]; Pod 22–28, β = −0.627 [1.55 vs. 2.90, p < 0.001]) rather than donor (Pod 1–7, β = n/a [1.88 vs. 2.76]; Pod 8–14, β = n/a [1.99 vs. 2.93]; Pod 15–21, β = −0.175 [1.91 vs. 2.94, p = 0.004]; Pod 22–28, β = n/a [1.61 vs. 2.67]) significantly contributed to the increase in the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio of tacrolimus for at least one month after surgery. We found that the tacrolimus C/D ratio significantly decreased from the third week after transplantation when the recipient carried both CYP3A5*1 (functional CYP3A5) and POR*28 (n = 19 [29.2%], median C/D ratio [inter quartile range] = 1.58 [1.39–2.17]), compared with that in the recipients carrying CYP3A5*1 and POR*1/*1 (n = 8 [12.3%], median C/D ratio [inter quartile range] = 2.23 [2.05–3.06]) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that the POR*28 polymorphism is another biomarker for the tacrolimus oral dosage after liver transplantation in patients carrying CYP3A5*1 rather than CYP3A5*3/*3.

Hospitalisation rates and predictors in people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hospitalisation is often harmful for people with dementia and results in high societal costs, so avoidance of unnecessary admissions is a global priority. However, no intervention has yet reduced admissions of community-dwelling people with dementia. We therefore aimed to examine hospitalisation rates of people with dementia and whether these differ from people without dementia and to identify socio-demographic and clinical predictors of hospitalisation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception to 9 May 2019. We included observational studies which (1) examined community-dwelling people with dementia of any age or dementia subtype, (2) diagnosed dementia using validated diagnostic criteria, and (3) examined all-cause general (i.e. non-psychiatric) hospital admissions. Two authors screened abstracts for inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed included studies for risk of bias. Three authors graded evidence strength using Cochrane's GRADE approach, including assessing for evidence of publication bias using Begg's test. We used random effects meta-analysis to pool estimates for hospitalisation risk in people with and without dementia.

RESULTS

We included 34 studies of 277,432 people with dementia: 17 from the USA, 15 from Europe, and 2 from Asia. The pooled relative risk of hospitalisation for people with dementia compared to those without was 1.42 (95% confidence interval 1.21, 1.66) in studies adjusted for age, sex, and physical comorbidity. Hospitalisation rates in people with dementia were between 0.37 and 1.26/person-year in high-quality studies. There was strong evidence that admission is associated with older age, and moderately strong evidence that multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and lower functional ability are associated with admission. There was strong evidence that dementia severity alone is not associated.

CONCLUSIONS

People with dementia are more frequently admitted to hospital than those without dementia, independent of physical comorbidities. Future interventions to reduce unnecessary hospitalisations should target potentially modifiable factors, such as polypharmacy and functional ability, in high-risk populations.

Geriatric pharmacotherapy: Appraising new drugs for neurologic disorders in older patients

New drug development for neurologic disorders has one of the highest attrition rates of all clinical drug developments. This is problematic when, with innovative technology available in so many aspects of life, modern societies expect to have effective treatments for neurodegenerative disorders and mental health conditions that provide something beyond simple symptomatic relief-the expectation is treatment that impacts and mitigates fundamental mechanisms that drive these disorders. The disease burden of neurologic disorders remains extremely high, whereas the proportion of patients receiving effective therapy is relatively low, demonstrating a sizeable unmet medical need. Whether for novel breakthrough therapies or for drugs considered successful, deciding on the basis of clinical trial data whether a particular treatment will be effective for a specific patient is always a leap of faith. However, expertise at reading trial results combined with knowledge of the patient and of his or her disease, together with an understanding of the effect of age on drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the effect of age on the patient's condition, and the effect of age on the patient's life and outlook will ensure the landing is safe. The focus of this article is to provide such knowledge and thereby optimize this expertise.

[Personalised pharmacotherapy in intensive care unit patients]

Critically ill patients need fast, effective and safe pharmacotherapy. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the administered drugs are influenced by numerous individual conditions. Genetic factors mainly determines drug metabolism. However, therapeutic decisions are not yet guided by genetic analyses. In elderly patients, the volume of distribution can be altered and renal elimination may be delayed. Drug-drug interactions involving current medications can increase the incidence of adverse effects from treatment in the intensive care unit. In early severe sepsis, plasma levels of water-soluble drugs can be decreased because of enhanced volume of distribution and increased renal clearance. Later on, drug elimination can be impaired by deterioration of liver and renal function. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic effects of continuous renal replacement therapy have to be considered. Plasma levels of critically ill patients show increased variability in comparison with healthy subjects or other patient groups. The therapeutic effect of antibiotics and of many other drugs cannot be assessed immediately. As dosage of these medications cannot be guided by their clinical efficacy, insufficient exposure or overdosage accompanied by toxic side effects may result. Standard dose recommendations that were developed in healthy volunteers or noncritically ill patients must be adapted to individual conditions and requirements of critically ill patients.

[Age 70 and older a criterion for inclusion - not exclusion]

BACKGROUND

Although older people are frequently prescribed more drugs than younger people, they are rarely included in clinical trials. Elderly patients often suffer from multimorbidity and are prescribed many drugs simultaneously. With age, physiological changes occur that can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs used, e.g., changes in the duration of action. There are several problematic implications to this, particularly relating to tolerability and possible negative effects for patients.

OBJECTIVES

Not only are guidelines for the treatment of elderly patients lacking, but also basic information about efficacy, tolerability, and interactions of drugs that are commonly prescribed to the elderly often missing. Physicians sometimes have no choice but to estimate the correct dosages for the elderly.

METHODS

Evaluations of secondary data and clinical trials, discussion, and analysis of basic research work on the basis of expert analysis.

RESULTS

There are very few clinical trials that include people over the age of 70. On the one hand, elderly people receive more drug prescriptions due to multimorbidity, compared with younger people, while on the other hand the risk of adverse drug reaction increases for precisely these individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to improve treatment safety in older people in terms of duration and dosage, randomized control trials (RCT) are essential to provide evidence of the benefits of a drug to patients. For this reason, the call for clinical trials after as well as before authorization, on patients treated with these drugs-and that especially means elderly patients-is long overdue.

Clinical Weighting of Drug-Drug Interactions in Hospitalized Elderly

Adverse drug reactions impact on patient health, effectiveness of pharmacological therapy and increased health care costs. This investigation intended to detect the most critical drug-drug interactions in hospitalized elderly patients, weighting clinical risk. We conducted a cross-sectional study between January and April 2014; all patients 70 years or older, hospitalized for >24 hr and prescribed at least one medication were included in the study. Drug-drug interactions were estimated by combining Stockley's, Hansten and Tatro drug interactions. Drug-drug interactions were weighted using a risk-analysis method based on failure modes, effects and criticality analysis. We calculated a criticality index for each drug involved in the drug-drug interactions based on the severity of the interaction mechanism, the frequency the drug was involved in drug-drug interactions and the risk of drug-drug interactions in patients with impaired renal function. The average number of drugs consumed in the hospital was 6 ± 2.69, involving 160 active ingredients. The most frequent were as follows: Furosemide, followed by Enalapril. Of drug-drug interactions, 2% were classified as contraindicated, 14% advised against and 83% advised caution during the hospital stay. Thirty-four drug-drug interactions were assessed, of which 23 were pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions and 12 were pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (1 was both). The clinical risk calculated for each drug-drug interaction included heparins + non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or Digoxin + Calcium Gluconate, cases which are pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions with agonist effect and clinical risk of bleeding, one of the most common clinical risks in the hospital. An index of clinical risk for drug-drug interactions can be calculated based on severity by the interaction mechanism, the frequency that the drug is involved in drug-drug interactions and the risk of drug-drug interactions in an elderly patient with impaired renal function.

Assessment of drug-drug interactions in hypertensive patients at a superspeciality hospital

Objective:

The objective of the study was to assess the incidence and pattern of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in hypertensive patients by using Micromedex and Medscape databases.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective observational study was carried out in a superspeciality hospital setting in South India for period of 9 months. Hypertensive patients who admitted into the hospital with the age more than 18 years, received more than 3 drugs per prescription and length of hospital stay for more than 24 hours were included in the study. An appropriate data was collected and assessed for DDIs with the help of Micromedex and Medscape databases.

Results:

A total of 227 patients were enrolled during the study period. Among the 227 patients, 48 of them developed 53 clinically significant DDIs. Out of 48 patients, most of them were in the age-group of 50–60 years [18 (37.49%)]. The percentage of DDIs were higher in males [30 (62.5%)] compared to females [18 (37.5%)]. The most common drugs responsible for DDIs in the present study were Insulin [18 (33.96%)] followed by Metoprolol [10 (18.86%)], Torsemide [8 (15.09%)], and Hydrochlorothiazide [8 (15.09%)]. The most commonly interacting pairs were Ciprofloxacin-Insulin [6 (11.32%)], followed by Metoprolol-Insulin [4 (7.54%)] and Atenolol-Insulin [4 (7.54%)]. The most common consequences of interacting pairs were reduced serum potassium levels and hyperglycemia.

Conclusion:

The overall incidence rate of DDIs was found to be 21.14% and the increasing number of co-morbidities (P ≤ 0.003) and polypharmacy (P ≤ 0.002) were the risk factor for the development of significant number of DDIs.

The pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and sunitinib

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sunitinib on pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin. The previous study proved that levofloxacin co-administered with sunitib changes the following pharmacokinetic parameters i.e. Cmax and AUC for both sunitinib and SU012662 (sunitinib metabolite). We will also investigate if the limited sample strategy can be applied for levofloxacin.

METHODS

Rabbits were divided into two groups. In both groups there were six animals. In the control group levofloxacin was administered and in investigated group levofloxacin and sunitinib were co-administered. The dose of levofloxacin was 20mg/kg and the dose of sunitinib was 25mg. The concentration in plasma was determined by HPLC-FLD. The pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated by WinNonLin software. The results were evaluated by the following statistical tests: Shapiro-Wilk, t-Student and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin obeys the two-compartment model. Sunitinib influences the following pharmacokinetic parameters of levofloxacin: half-life, elimination constant and volume of distribution. Statistical analysis proved that there is a correlation between AUC and the following five time-points: 0.25 h, 4h, 6h, 10h and 12h.

CONCLUSIONS

The study proved that there is a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sunitinib and levofloxacin. The statistical analysis proved that the limited sample strategy can be applied for levofloxacin.

Liver physiology and liver diseases in the elderly

The liver experiences various changes with aging that could affect clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with liver diseases. Both liver volume and blood flow decrease significantly with age. These changes and decreased cytochrome P450 activity can affect drug metabolism, increasing susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury. Immune responses against pathogens or neoplastic cells are lower in the elderly, although these individuals may be predisposed to autoimmunity through impairment of dendritic cell maturation and reduction of regulatory T cells. These changes in immune functions could alter the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis and autoimmune liver diseases, as well as the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, elderly patients have significantly decreased reserve functions of various organs, reducing their tolerability to treatments for liver diseases. Collectively, aged patients show various changes of the liver and other organs that could affect the clinical characteristics and management of liver diseases in these patients.

Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics and pleural fluid penetration in patients with pleural effusion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and penetration of moxifloxacin (MXF) in patients with various types of pleural effusion. Twelve patients with empyema/parapneumonic effusion (PPE) and 12 patients with malignant pleural effusion were enrolled in the study. A single-dose pharmacokinetic study was performed after intravenous administration of 400 mg MXF. Serial plasma (PL) and pleural fluid (PF) samples were collected during a 24-h time interval after drug administration. The MXF concentration in PL and PF was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and main pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Penetration of MXF in PF was determined by the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC24) in PF (AUC24PF) to the AUC24 in PL. No statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics in PL were observed between the two groups, despite the large interindividual variability in the volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life. The maximum concentration in PF (CmaxPF) in patients with empyema/PPE was 2.23±1.31 mg/liter, and it was detected 7.50±2.39 h after the initiation of the infusion. In patients with malignant effusion, CmaxPF was 2.96±1.45 mg/liter, but it was observed significantly earlier, at 3.58±1.38 h (P<0.001). Both groups revealed similar values of AUC24PF (31.83±23.52 versus 32.81±12.66 mg·h/liter). Penetration of MXF into PF was similarly good in both patient groups (1.11±0.74 versus 1.17±0.39). Despite similar plasma pharmacokinetics, patients with empyema/parapneumonic effusion showed a significant delay in achievement of PF maximum MXF levels compared to those with malignant effusion. However, in both groups, the degree of MXF PF penetration and the on-site drug exposure, expressed by AUC24PF, did not differ according to the type of pleural effusion.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: an update on the 2007 overview

INTRODUCTION

Idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI) is rare, with an incidence of approximately 19 per 100,000 treated individuals.

AREAS COVERED

An update on the epidemiology, pathogenic mechanisms, diagnosis, outcome, risk factors for idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatotoxicity, specific classes of drug hepatotoxicity and biomarkers to predict DILI are covered. Cumulative drug exposure and HLA phenotypes play an important role in the pathogenesis of DILI. Patients who present with suspected DILI and jaundice should have biliary obstruction and acute viral hepatitis, including hepatitis E excluded. Immune-mediated DILI will respond to steroid therapy. Patients with an elevated bilirubin and a hepatocellular pattern of liver function tests have severe liver injury with a mortality of greater than 10% and a risk of acute liver failure. Women have an increased risk of hepatocellular DILI. Antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressant therapy remain the commonest causes of DILI in the Western Hemisphere. Statin therapy rarely causes severe liver injury.

EXPERT OPINION

The establishment of prospective registries for DILI has provided valuable data on the pathogenesis and outcome of DILI. Drug-specific computerised causality assessment tools should improve the diagnosis of DILI. The clinical utility of genetic polymorphisms associated with drug-specific DILI is limited.

Anticoagulant therapy with the oral direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with hepatic impairment

The direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (dabigatran) have gained approval for use in several indications, most notably for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Hepatic impairment can affect the disposition of these anticoagulants considerably not only because of the hepatic metabolism of the direct FXa inhibitors but also because moderate to severely impaired hepatic function will affect coagulation. This review describes the key pharmacological properties of novel oral anticoagulants with special attention to patients with impaired hepatic function. In subjects with moderately impaired liver function (i.e. Child-Pugh classification B), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of rivaroxaban (10 mg single dose) is increased by 2.27-fold, which is paralleled by an increase in FXa inhibition. The AUC of apixaban (5 mg single dose) is increased by 1.09-fold, whereas the AUC of edoxaban (15 mg single dose) is decreased by 4.8 % and the AUC of dabigatran (150 mg single dose) is decreased by 5.6 %. Specific labelling restrictions for rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran regarding impaired hepatic function are based on both the Child-Pugh classification and liver-related exclusion criteria applied in pivotal clinical trials. Rivaroxaban is contraindicated in patients with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk, including cirrhotic patients classified as Child-Pugh B and C. Apixaban can be used with caution in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) or moderate (Child-Pugh B) hepatic impairment or in patients with alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels >2× upper limit of normal (ULN). Apixaban is not recommended in patients with severe hepatic impairment and is contraindicated in those with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk. Dabigatran is not recommended in patients with elevated liver enzymes (>2× ULN). Dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with hepatic impairment or liver disease expected to have any impact on survival. Currently, edoxaban is not available in the US or European markets. However, the Japanese label did not restrict use in hepatic dysfunction but advises care in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Drug-induced liver injury in the elderly

Historically, the elderly have been considered to be at increased risk for drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Animal studies have demonstrated changes in hepatic physiology that affect drug metabolism in the aging liver; however, there is no evidence that this leads to any appreciable deterioration of liver function in healthy older humans. Updated data from international DILI registries give us pause to consider whether the elderly are truly at increased risk to develop hepatic injury. Instead, hepatotoxicity in the elderly appears to be more a function of drug exposure, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions. Isoniazid and benoxaprofen are the only two agents with a well-studied correlation between increasing age and risk of DILI. Nevertheless, given the increasing proportion of patients over age 65 in the U.S. and abroad, the influence of age on the risk of DILI is the focus of this review.

Sex-dependent modulation of treatment response

The response to a psychotropic medication reflects characteristics of both the medication and the substrate, ie, the individual receiving the medication. Sex is an individual characteristic that influences all elements of the pharmacokinetic process - absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. The effects of sex on these components of the pharmacokinetic process often counterbalance one another to yield minimal or varying sexual differences in blood levels achieved. However, sex also appears to influence pharmacodynamics, the tissue response to a given level of medication. Consideration by the practitioner of sex as a possible contributing factor to treatment nonresponse will enhance the efficacy and precision of clinical interventions.

Concurrent use of corticosteroids with licorice-containing TCM preparations in Taiwan: a National Health Insurance Database study

OBJECTIVES

This study used a nationwide population-based dataset from the 1997-2003 National Health Insurance claims to explore the prevalence, frequency, and relative risk of concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids with licorice-containing Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) preparations that might possibly result in drug-herb interactions.

DESIGN

This study was based on the complete datasets of Western medicine and TCM outpatient reimbursement claims from 1997 to 2003 contained in the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. According to the date and duration of prescriptions, the patients who concurrently used systemic corticosteroids with licorice-containing TCM preparations were derived for statistical analysis.

SETTING

This study was set in Taiwan.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographics of patients who used corticosteroids with licorice-containing TCM preparations concurrently, including age, gender, and the frequency and percentage of major diseases in International Classification of Diseases, 9th version, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) categories. The relative risk of potential corticosteroid-herb interaction was also analyzed with respect to different characteristics of the patients (age, sexuality etc.).

RESULTS

The prevalence of concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids with licorice-containing TCM preparations through prescriptions from different Chinese medicine and Western medicine physicians was 1.495%. Among the major disease categories, ICD-9-CM codes 280-289 had the highest prevalence rate of 3.803%.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential risk of corticosteroid-licorice interactions may happen, even through formal medical services. In the future, such educational propagations should be reinforced. Furthermore, an alert device that includes well-recognized drug-herb interactions should be built into every hospital's computer system to remind physicians to be cautious on drug safety.

Potential drug interactions in patients admitted to cardiology wards of a south Indian teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

The potential drug-drug interaction (pDDI) increases as the number of concomitant medications increases. Patients with cardiovascular disorders are at higher risk for drug- drug interactions because of the types and number of drugs they receive. While drug interactions are reported to be common, there is no published report of the prevalence of such interactions among Indian cardiac patients. The aim of the present study was to identify the pattern of pDDI and document any observed interaction. It was also planned to evaluate the demography of patients and correlate it with the drug-drug interactions.

METHOD

A prospective observational study from Oct 2007 to Apr 2008 was carried out in 'cardiology department' of a hospital in South India. Those patients who were taking at least two drugs and had a hospital stay of at least 48 hours were included in the study. The medications of the patients were analyzed for possible interactions. Factors associated with pDDI were studied. The actual interactions that were observed during the hospital stay in the study subjects were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 812 patients were included in the study. 388 pDDIs were identified among 249 patients. The incidence of pDDI was 30.67%. The most common potential interactions were between aspirin & heparin (29.38%), and clopidogrel & heparin (7.21%). Drug classes most commonly involved were antiplatelets, anticoagulants and diuretics. Majority of interactions were of moderate severity, delayed onset, and pharmacodynamic in nature. Total 68 actual interactions were observed in the observed cases.

CONCLUSION

The present study identified pDDIs and also documented interactions in cardiovascular patients. Factors which had correlation with adverse drug interactions were identified. This study highlights the need for screening prescriptions of cardiovascular patients for pDDIs and proactive monitoring of patients who have identified risk factors; this helps in detection and prevention of possible adverse drug interactions.

Pharmacological and clinical profile of newer antidepressants: implications for the treatment of elderly patients

The pharmacological treatment of older adults with major depressive disorder presents a variety of challenges, including a relative lack of high quality studies designed to measure the efficacy and safety of antidepressants specific to this patient population. Gaining a clear understanding of how to use antidepressants in elderly patients with depression, especially new and widely used agents, would provide valuable insight to clinicians. The purpose of the current article is to review the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of newer antidepressants (i.e. escitalopram, duloxetine and desvenlafaxine) in the treatment of late-life depression. To accomplish this goal, a MEDLINE and PubMed search (1966 - February 2010) was conducted for relevant articles. Animal and human studies have clearly demonstrated the effects of desvenlafaxine, duloxetine and escitalopram on monoamine reuptake transporters. The serotonergic and noradrenergic actions of desvenlafaxine and duloxetine may provide for a faster onset of antidepressant activity in the elderly, but more definitive data are needed and the clinical effects of the possible faster onset of action need to be elucidated. Duloxetine and escitalopram are extensively metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and the decreased hepatic metabolism present in many older adults should be taken into account when prescribing these medications. Duloxetine possesses the greatest likelihood of producing clinically relevant drug-drug interactions because of its inhibition of CYP2D6. All three agents must also be used cautiously in older adults with poor renal function. In terms of clinical efficacy, 14 prospective published trials involving escitalopram (n = 8) and duloxetine (n = 6) in the treatment of older adults with major depressive disorder were identified. No such studies involving desvenlafaxine were found. Of the five randomized, double-blind, controlled trials, 46% and 37% of antidepressant-treated patients were considered responders and remitters, respectively. In contrast to escitalopram, duloxetine-treated patients experienced improvements in depressive symptoms that more consistently differentiated themselves from the symptoms of placebo-treated patients. Escitalopram and duloxetine were generally well tolerated, but 5-20% and 10-27% of patients, respectively, dropped out because of medication-related adverse effects. Adverse effects experienced by older adults were generally similar to those experienced by younger adults, although indirect comparisons suggest that older adults are more likely to experience dry mouth and constipation with duloxetine and escitalopram, while orthostasis may be more common in older adults prescribed desvenlafaxine. Overall, duloxetine and escitalopram represent modestly effective treatments for late-life depression that are generally well tolerated but do produce a variety of adverse effects. Conclusions regarding desvenlafaxine cannot be made at this time because of a lack of geriatric-specific data.

Geriatric drug therapy: neglecting the inevitable majority

Demographic evolution will considerably increase the number of people aged 65 years and beyond in the coming decades. The elderly not only represent the most heterogeneous population, but also are a major user group for prescribed medicines, a predominance that will continue to further increase. Medicines and medication management are much more complex and challenging in the elderly and can only be addressed through a multidisciplinary approach. There is strong evidence that the elderly are able to properly manage their medication; however, their medications require different features than the standard medications used by adults. The elderly are exposed to several chronic disease conditions and their treatments, as well as experience age-related changes and limitations that need to be reflected in their medication management strategies. Geriatric drug therapy remains a multidisciplinary task. The health care industry, physicians, pharmacists, nurses and care givers provide and guide the patient's therapy according to individual needs, while the health care system and regulatory authorities build the necessary framework of support and resources.Any realistic and significant enhancement to the elderly patients' medicines and medication management needs to be addressed by all disciplines and stakeholders involved since the absence of any of the stakeholders in the overall process negatively impacts the achievable enhancement in geriatric drug therapy.

Medication and falls: risk and optimization

The association between drugs and falls has been widely studied in the past 3 decades, with increasingly robust evidence of a causal link. Both specific classes of drugs and the total number of drugs taken are associated with falls. This review examines some of the reasons why older people are at greater risk of drug-related adverse events such as falls. We discuss the role of drugs in general and polypharmacy (the concurrent use of multiple drugs) on the risk of falling, with a focus on community-dwelling older people. We critically appraise the evidence that specific classes of drugs, such as benzodiazepines and antidepressants, increase the risk of falling and that falls can be prevented through interventions that target medications.

Risk factors for idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare disorder that is not related directly to dosage and little is known about individuals who are at increased risk. There are no suitable preclinical models for the study of idiosyncratic DILI and its pathogenesis is poorly understood. It is likely to arise from complex interactions among genetic, nongenetic host susceptibility, and environmental factors. Nongenetic risk factors include age, sex, and other diseases (eg, chronic liver disease or human immunodeficiency virus infection). Compound-specific risk factors include daily dose, metabolism characteristics, and propensity for drug interactions. Alcohol consumption has been proposed as a risk factor for DILI from medications, but there is insufficient evidence to support this. Many studies have explored genetic defects that might be involved in pathogenesis and focused on genes involved in drug metabolism and the immune response. Multicenter databases of patients with DILI (the United States Drug Induced Liver Injury Network, DILIGEN, and the Spanish DILI registry) are important tools for clinical and genetic research. A genome-wide association study of flucloxacillin hepatotoxicity has yielded groundbreaking results and many similar studies are underway. Nonetheless, DILI is challenging to investigate because of its rarity, the lack of experimental models, the number of medications that might cause it, and challenges to diagnosis.

Small intestinal disorders in the elderly

The topic of gastroenterology (GI) in the elderly has been extensively reviewed. It takes special skill, patience and insight to interview the elderly, as well as to appreciate their altered physiology and interpretation of their presenting symptoms and signs, often against an extreme background of complex medical problems. The maldigestion and malabsorption coupled with altered motility contributes to the development of malnutrition. There generally a decrease of function of the GI tract, but there may be loss of adaptability in response to changes in diet or nutritional stress. Pathological alterations which might lead to minor overall intestinal functional variations in the young because of a normal process of adaptation, may lead to much more serious events in the elderly.

Residual effects of hypnotic drugs in aging drivers submitted to simulated accident scenarios: an exploratory study

RATIONALE

The effects of hypnotic drugs on driving performance are most often evaluated on young healthy subjects by using a monotonous motorway driving test. The effects of drugs in urban driving situations have not yet been evaluated in any age group. Our objectives were to assess residual effects of the most prescribed hypnotics, zolpidem and zopiclone, on older middle-age drivers' capacities in an urban situation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen healthy subjects aged 55 to 65 years underwent this double-blind, balanced, cross-over study. Zopiclone (7.5 mg), zolpidem (10 mg), and flunitrazepam (1 mg; used as positive control) or a placebo were administered at each subject's home at 11:00 PM: under the supervision of an investigator. The next morning, the subjects had to drive in a simulated urban environment where accident scenarios were introduced. Accident scenarios were implemented using data from real accident cases.

RESULTS

Hypnotics did not significantly increase the number of collisions. However, significantly higher speeds were found with zopiclone and flunitrazepam; moreover, zolpidem and zopiclone induced modifications of the lateral position of the car on the road.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not reveal any major residual effects of the hypnotics studied on driving performance in aging drivers. However, the urban driving situations used here for the first time in the evaluation of drugs revealed some modifications in driving habits which could lead to risky behavior. It thus appears that urban driving simulations are useful for gaining knowledge about the effects of drugs on driving behavior.

Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly

Aging involves progressive impairments in the functional reserve of multiple organs, which might also affect drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. In addition, the elderly population will develop multiple diseases and, consequently, often has to take several drugs. As the hepatic first-pass effect of highly cleared drugs could be reduced (due to decreases in liver mass and perfusion), the bioavailability of some drugs can be increased in the elderly. Significant changes in body composition occur with advancing age. Lipophilic drugs may have an increased volume of distribution (Vd) with a prolonged half-life, and water-soluble drugs tend to have a smaller Vd. In the elderly, hepatic drug clearance of some drugs can be reduced by up to 30% and CYP-mediated phase I reactions are more likely to be impaired than phase II metabolism, which is relatively preserved in the elderly. Concerning the most important CYP3A4 studies with human liver microsomes and clinical studies with the validated probe, midazolam, it is indicated that there are no significant differences in CYP3A4 activity between young and old populations. Finally, renal excretion is decreased (up to 50%) in about two thirds of elderly subjects, but confounding factors such as hypertension and coronary heart disease account also for a decline in kidney function. In conclusion, age-related physiological and pharmacokinetic changes as well as the presence of comorbidity and polypharmacy will complicate drug therapy in the elderly.

Analysis of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in nursing homes in Central Taiwan

With the progressive aging of the population, the long-term nursing care and drug safety for the elderly are gradually gaining attention. In Taiwan, nursing homes are the main institutes helping society or families take care of elderly people suffering from diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the prescribed medications of nursing home residents, the occurrence of DDIs and the association between the number of drugs and DDIs with a view to reinforce drug safety for the elderly. The findings of this study showed that the mean number of medications per resident was 5.74+/-2.4. Of the 323 samples, 81 (25.1%) had experienced DDIs, 63 (64.95%) were of moderate and 7 (7.2%) of major severity. The findings also showed that the number of potential DDIs increased as the number of medications used per residents increased. The residents with nine or more medications tended to have more DDIs, in comparison to those with one or two medications. The odds ratio (OR) was 11.389, which had reached statistical significance in difference. Therefore, to reduce potential DDIs, the number of medications for the senior people with chronic diseases should be properly controlled.

Antiarrhythmics: elimination and dosage considerations in hepatic impairment

Many drugs, including most antiarrhythmics (some of which are now of limited clinical use) are eliminated by the hepatic route. If liver function is impaired, it can be anticipated that hepatic clearance will be delayed, which can lead to more pronounced drug accumulation with multiple dosing. Consequently, the potential risks of adverse events could be increased, especially as antiarrhythmics have a narrow therapeutic index. The present review summarises the available pharmacokinetic data on the most popular antiarrhythmic drugs to identify the enzymes involved in the metabolism of the various agents and confirm whether liver disease affects their elimination. Despite long usage of some of these drugs (e.g. amiodarone, diltiazem, disopyramide, procainamide and quinidine), surprisingly few data are available in patients with liver disease, making it difficult to give recommendations for dosage adjustment. In contrast, for carvedilol, lidocaine (lignocaine), propafenone and verapamil, sufficient clinical studies have been performed. For these drugs, a marked decrease in systemic and/or oral clearance and significant prolongation of the elimination half-life have been documented, which should be counteracted by a 2- to 3-fold reduction of the dosage in patients with moderate to severe liver cirrhosis. For sotalol, disopyramide and procainamide, renal clearance contributes considerably to overall elimination, suggesting that dosage reductions are probably unnecessary in patients with liver disease as long as renal function is normal. The hepatically eliminated antiarrhythmics are metabolised mainly by different cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes (e.g. CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6) and partly also by conjugations. As the extent of impairment in clearance is in the same range for all of these agents, it could be assumed that they have a common vulnerability and that, consequently, hepatic dysfunction will affect CYP-mediated phase I pathways in a similar fashion. The severity of liver disease has been estimated clinically by the validated Pugh score, and functionally by calculation of the clearance of probe drugs (e.g. antipyrine). Both approaches can be helpful in estimating/predicting impairments in drug metabolism, including antiarrhythmics. In conclusion, hepatic impairment decreases the elimination of many antiarrhythmics to such an extent that dosage reductions are highly recommended in such populations, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

The effect of old age on liver oxygenation and the hepatic expression of VEGF and VEGFR2

In old age, the liver contains less ATP and hypoxia-responsive genes are upregulated. Age-related changes in hepatic perfusion and the liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) could contribute to this altered hepatic oxygen-dependent metabolism by causing intrahepatocytic hypoxia. Furthermore, age-related changes in the LSEC ('pseudocapillarization') have been partially induced by ATP depletion. To investigate whether there is intracellular hypoxia in the old rat liver, pimonidazole immunohistochemistry in intact livers and ATP levels in isolated LSECs were studied from young and old rats. There were no age-related changes. To determine whether defenestration of the LSEC could impair oxygen diffusion, pimonidazole immunohistochemistry was performed in rats treated with poloxamer 407. Despite defenestration, there was no change in pimonidazole staining. Immunohistochemistry was then performed to determine whether there are age-related changes in VEGF and VEGFR2. VEGF staining was not associated with age. However, there was an increase in perisinusoidal VEGFR2 expression with increasing age. In conclusion, liver hypoxia does not occur in old age and LSEC pseudocapillarization does not constitute an oxygen-diffusion barrier. There are no age-related changes in VEGF expression but an increase in perisinusoidal VEGFR2 expression, which has implications for the effects of aging on the hepatic sinusoid.

Effects of Old Age on Hepatocyte Oxygenation

Hepatic phase I drug metabolism is diminished in old age. It has been suggested that hepatocyte hypoxia and impaired bioenergetics in old age may contribute to this aging change. Therefore, we sought to determine whether old age was associated with in vivo hypoxia in the aged rat liver. Immunohistochemical studies with the nitroimidazole hypoxia marker, pimonidazole, were carried out in livers from young and old rats. Preliminary studies were performed on four young (4-month-old) and six old (2-year-old) F344 rats to directly visualize the distribution and intensity of pimonidazole staining. There were no significant differences in the distribution or in the intensity of pimonidazole immunohistochemical staining between young and aged rat livers. In conclusion, no major changes in hepatocyte oxygenation were seen in the aged rat liver, and the ATP changes are unlikely to be secondary to hepatocyte hypoxia or impaired oxygen diffusion into the liver. It is thus more likely that age-related reduction in liver ATP is attributable to mitochondrial dysfunction.