Cancer gene therapy: Part 2. Candidate transgenes and their clinical development

Locoregional intravascular viral therapy of cancer: precision guidance for Paris's arrow?

Viral therapy of cancer includes strategies such as viral transduction of tumour cells with 'suicide genes', using viral infection to trigger immune-mediated tumour cell death and using oncolytic viruses for their direct anti-tumour action. However, problems still remain in terms of adequate viral delivery to tumours. A role is also emerging for single-organ isolation and perfusion. Having begun with the advent of isolated limb perfusion for extremity malignancy, experimental systems have been developed for the perfusion of other organs, particularly the liver, kidneys and lungs. These are beginning to be adopted into clinical treatment pathways. The combination of these two modalities is potentially significant. Locoregional perfusion increases the exposure of tumour cells to viral agents. In addition, the avoidance of systemic elimination through the immune and reticulo-endothelial systems should provide a mechanism for increased transduction/infection of target cells. The translation of laboratory research to clinical practice would occur within the context of perfusion programmes, which are already established in the clinic. Many of these programmes include the use of vasoactive cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha, which may have an effect on viral uptake. Evidence of activation of specific anti-tumour immunological responses by intratumoural and other existing methods of viral administration raises the intriguing possibility of a locoregional therapy, with the ability to affect distant sites of disease. In this review, we examined the state of the literature in this area and summarized current findings before indicating likely areas of continuing interest.

Microvascular free tissue transfer for gene delivery: in vivo evaluation of different routes of plasmid and adenoviral delivery

Transfer of healthy autologous tissue as a microvascular free flap facilitates reconstruction during ablative cancer surgery. In addition to filling surgical defects, free flaps might concentrate viral vectors at the tumour bed and mediate local therapeutic effects. We evaluated the magnitude, topography and duration of luciferase gene expression after plasmid and adenoviral delivery in rat superficial inferior epigastric (SIE) flaps. For plasmid delivery, luciferase expression was significantly increased by all transduction routes (topical, intraflap injection, intravascular) (P<0.01) at day 1, but not at day 7. The spread of luciferase expression was significantly different between the 4 groups at 1 day (P=0.026) and was greatest for flaps transduced by intravascular injection. For adenoviral transduction, total radiance was significantly different between the transduced groups at 1, 14 and 28 days (P<0.05 for all comparisons). The highest levels of radiance were seen in the intravascular group. There was a statistically significant difference in the spread of light emission between the 3 groups at 1 (P=0.009) and 14 (P=0.013) days, but this was no longer evident at 28 days. Intravascular adenoviral delivery yields high-level, diffuse and durable gene expression in rat SIE flaps and is suitable for examination in therapeutic models.

Gene therapy in head and neck cancer: a review

Gene therapy for cancer is a rapidly evolving field with head and neck squamous cell cancer being one of the more frequently targeted cancer types. The number of clinical trials in the UK is growing and there is already a commercially available agent in China. Various gene therapy strategies along with delivery mechanisms for targeting head and neck cancer are reviewed.

Escherichia coli nitroreductase plus CB1954 enhances the effect of radiotherapy in vitro and in vivo

Escherichia coli nitroreductase (NTR) converts the prodrug CB1954 (5-(aziridin-1-yl)-2,4-dinitrobenzamide) into a bifunctional alkylating agent that causes DNA crosslinks. In this study, the ability of NTR to enhance the combined effects of CB1954 and radiation has been tested in vitro and in vivo. Stably transduced ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3-NTR) that are sensitive to CB1954 (IC(50)=0.35 muM) demonstrated enhanced cytotoxicity when treated with CB1954 and single-fraction irradiation. The NTR-CB1954 system mediated a bystander effect in combination with radiation on transfer of conditioned medium from SKOV3-NTR, but not SKOV3, cells to SW480 target cells. The ability of CB1954 to enhance radiation-induced cytotoxicity in SKOV3-NTR (but not SKOV3) cells was also demonstrated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with dual staining for propidium iodide/fluorescein diacetate, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dichloride staining of apoptotic cells and measurement of double-stranded DNA breaks by FACS and confocal microscopy for gammaH2AX foci. Adenoviral delivery of NTR, under constitutive cytomegalovirus or tissue-specific CTP1 promoters, increased the in vitro cytotoxicity of CB1954 plus radiation in MTT and clonogenic assays. Finally, adenoviral delivery of NTR plus CB1954 enhanced the effect of fractionated radiotherapy (12 Gy in four fractions) in SW480 xenograft tumours in nude mice.

Methylation of tumor suppressor genes p16(INK4a), p27(Kip1) and E-cadherin in carcinogenesis

Not only genomic mutations but also abnormal epigenetic methylation can significantly contribute to gene silencing and carcinogenesis. Methylation is particularly often observed in the CpG islands of the promoter regions in the regulatory genes. However, there are considerable differences in the incidence of methylation e.g. in the tumor suppressor genes, so that aberrant methylation of p16(INK4a) is relatively frequently observed in tumors, p27(Kip1) methylation is rare, and the incidence of E-cadherin methylation occurs at an intermediate rate. Although true genomic defects are generally much less common than methylation, parallel tendencies for both are often observed, probably reflecting the different levels of evolutionary advantage for tumor cells from inactivation of different genes. This also suggests that loss of p27 expression could be more a consequence of carcinogenesis, while lost p16 expression is a true oncogenic event. Due to the role of p27 in maintaining cellular quiescence, however, loss of its expression can still be a useful partial indicator of the aggressiveness of cancer. Loss of E-cadherin or its catenin partners of cellular adhesion will result in increasing invasiveness and metastatic potential of neoplastic cells but, because of several alternative routes to the same effect, incidence of lost expression for one component gene like E-cadherin does not need to be very high. Similarly, there must be a relatively high number of genes with modest or low incidence of aberrant silencing by methylation, to reflect multiple alternatives for the multistep process of carcinogenesis. Nevertheless, methylation of different genes also shows characteristic differences between different cancer and tumor types, and the epigenetic methylation patterns therefore have considerable diagnostic and prognostic potential. Realising this potential requires efficient methods for profiling the status of methylation. Such profiling methods have only recently become available and are still under relatively rapid development.

Gene therapy for head and neck cancer

The prognosis of patients with advanced head and neck cancer has not changed significantly in the last twenty years, despite concerted efforts to optimize treatment using conventional modalities such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Novel therapeutic approaches based on our increasing understanding of the molecular changes that underlie the development of cancer have the potential to alter this situation. Gene therapy involves the delivery of genetic sequences in to tumour or normal cells for a therapeutic purpose. A number of viral and non-viral vectors have been developed that have the ability to deliver therapeutic genes specifically to tumours. These therapeutic genes can exert their effects by correcting existing genetic abnormalities, by killing cells directly or indirectly through recruitment of the immune system. In this review, the various gene therapy strategies that are under development are presented with particular reference to the treatment of head and neck cancer.