MR imaging and computed tomography in patients with rectal tumours clinically judged as locally advanced

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in dogs with vaginal leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

In humans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred over computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of pelvic lesions. Although CT findings of several pelvic tumours have been reported in veterinary medicine, MRI findings are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the CT and MRI findings in dogs with vaginal leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study of five dogs compared the CT and MRI findings of intrapelvic lesions, including vaginal leiomyoma (n = 4) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 1). No invasion of the surrounding tissue was detected on histopathological examination. In this retrospective study, the following parameters of CT and MRI were recorded for each dog: the border between the lesion and the adjacent pelvic organs, including the prostate, rectum or urethra; signal intensity (SI) of the lesion; enhancement pattern; presence of haemorrhage; necrosis or cystic areas and lymphadenopathy. Because SI on MRI is affected by cell density, tumour cell density was analysed using a microscope slide.

RESULTS

In vaginal leiomyoma, the border between the lesion and the surrounding pelvic organ tends to be clearer on MRI than on CT. In vaginal leiomyosarcoma, the border was comparable between MRI and CT. Each lesion showed heterogeneous enhancement on CT and MRI scans. In each lesion, the assessment of haemorrhage, necrosis, cystic areas and lymphadenopathy was comparable between MRI and CT. The SI of the lesion on T2WI of the vaginal leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma were hyperintense in four cases (4/4; 100%) and mixed intense in one case (1/1; 100%), respectively. The cell density of leiomyosarcoma is higher than that of leiomyomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The SI on T2WI may be useful for differentiating leiomyoma from leiomyosarcoma. MRI may be useful to differentiate vaginal leiomyomas from leiomyosarcomas and evaluate margins.

Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion

AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) as compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in identifying mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS: Ninety-one patients with biopsy proven rectal adenocarcinoma referred for thoracic and abdominal CT staging were enrolled in this study. The contrast-enhanced MDCT scans were performed on a 256 row scanner (ICT, Philips) with the following acquisition parameters: tube voltage 120 KV, tube current 150-300 mAs. Imaging data were reviewed as axial and as multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) images along the rectal tumor axis. MRI study, performed on 1.5 T with dedicated phased array multicoil, included multiplanar T2 and axial T1 sequences and diffusion weighted images (DWI). Axial and MPR CT images independently were compared to MRI and MRF involvement was determined. Diagnostic accuracy of both modalities was compared and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS: According to MRI, the MRF was involved in 51 patients and not involved in 40 patients. DWI allowed to recognize the tumor as a focal mass with high signal intensity on high b-value images, compared with the signal of the normal adjacent rectal wall or with the lower tissue signal intensity background. The number of patients correctly staged by the native axial CT images was 71 out of 91 (41 with involved MRF; 30 with not involved MRF), while by using the MPR 80 patients were correctly staged (45 with involved MRF; 35 with not involved MRF). Local tumor staging suggested by MDCT agreed with those of MRI, obtaining for CT axial images sensitivity and specificity of 80.4% and 75%, positive predictive value (PPV) 80.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) 75% and accuracy 78%; while performing MPR the sensitivity and specificity increased to 88% and 87.5%, PPV was 90%, NPV 85.36% and accuracy 88%. MPR images showed higher diagnostic accuracy, in terms of MRF involvement, than native axial images, as compared to the reference magnetic resonance images. The difference in accuracy was statistically significant (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION: New generation CT scanner, using high resolution MPR images, represents a reliable diagnostic tool in assessment of loco-regional and whole body staging of advanced rectal cancer, especially in patients with MRI contraindications.

The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis

BACKGROUND

To perform a metaanalysis to determine and compare the diagnostic performance of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), and computed tomography (CT) in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy.

METHODS

All previously published articles on the role of MRI, CT, and/or ERUS in predicting the response of rectal cancer to preoperative therapy were collected. We divided the objective in 3 parts: the accuracy to assess (i) complete response, (ii) to detect T4 tumors with invasion to the circumferential resection margin (CRM), and (iii) to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis. The pooled estimates of, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated using a bivariate mixed effect analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies comprising 2,224 patients were included. (i) The pooled accuracy to assess complete tumor response were (a) 75% for MRI, (b) 82% for ERUS, (c) and 83% for CT. (ii) Pooled accuracy to detect T4 tumors with invasion to the CRM were (a) 88% and (b) 94% for ERUS. (iii) Pooled accuracy to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis was (a) 72% for MRI, (b) 72% for ERUS, (c) and 65% for CT.

CONCLUSION

MRI, CT, and ERUS cannot be used to predict complete response of locally advanced rectal cancer after CRT. In addition, the positive predictive value for these imaging techniques is low for the assessment of tumor invasion in the CRM. The accuracy of the modalities to predict the presence of metastatic lymph node disease is also low.

Patients who undergo preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer restaged by using diagnostic MR imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To obtain performance values of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for restaging locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment regarding tumor staging, nodal staging, and tumor-free circumferential resection margins (CRMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies regarding restaging compared with a reference standard by using the terms rectal neoplasms, MR imaging, and chemotherapy. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used, and data on imaging criteria, histopathologic criteria, and restaging were extracted. Responders were defined as positives and nonresponders, as negatives. Mean sensitivity, mean specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were determined by using a bivariate random-effects model. A positive LR greater than 5 implied moderate results for responders.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies evaluated 1556 patients. For tumor stage, mean sensitivity was 50.4%, mean specificity was 91.2%, positive LR was 5.76, and negative LR was 0.54. Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging showed comparable positive LR with significantly improved sensitivity (P = .01) and negative LR (P = .04). Experienced observers showed higher sensitivity (P = .01) and lower negative LR (P = .03) compared with less experienced observers. For CRM, mean sensitivity, mean specificity, positive LR, and negative LR were 76.3%, 85.9%, 5.40, and 0.28, respectively. For nodal stage per patient, mean sensitivity, mean specificity, positive LR, and negative LR were 76.5%, 59.8%, 1.90, and 0.39, respectively; and for nodal stage on a lesion basis, these values were 90.7%, 73.0%, 3.37, and 0.13, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MR imaging showed heterogeneous results of diagnostic performances for restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment, but significantly better results were demonstrated when DW imaging was used or with experienced observers. MR imaging can also be used for evaluation of CRM staging, but nodal staging remains challenging.

An evaluation of four CT-MRI co-registration techniques for radiotherapy treatment planning of prone rectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

MRI is the preferred staging modality for rectal carcinoma patients. This work assesses the CT-MRI co-registration accuracy of four commercial rigid-body techniques for external beam radiotherapy treatment planning for patients treated in the prone position without fiducial markers.

METHODS

17 patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma were scanned with CT and MRI in the prone position without the use of fiducial markers. A reference co-registration was performed by consensus of a radiologist and two physicists. This was compared with two automated and two manual techniques on two separate treatment planning systems. Accuracy and reproducibility were analysed using a measure of target registration error (TRE) that was based on the average distance of the mis-registration between vertices of the clinically relevant gross tumour volume as delineated on the CT image.

RESULTS

An automated technique achieved the greatest accuracy, with a TRE of 2.3 mm. Both automated techniques demonstrated perfect reproducibility and were significantly faster than their manual counterparts. There was a significant difference in TRE between registrations performed on the two planning systems, but there were no significant differences between the manual and automated techniques.

CONCLUSION

For patients with rectal cancer, MRI acquired in the prone treatment position without fiducial markers can be accurately registered with planning CT. An automated registration technique offered a fast and accurate solution with associated uncertainties within acceptable treatment planning limits.

Local staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging

During the past decades the management of patients with rectal cancer has substantially changed, with a significant reduction in local recurrence rates following the introduction of better imaging, better surgery, and more efficient neoadjuvant therapy. This review discusses the clinically relevant information radiologists should know on staging of rectal cancer patients. The crucial role of the radiologist in patient management is explained. Furthermore, the evidence for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging and restaging of rectal cancer patients as well as the main features that need to be evaluated when interpreting rectal cancer MRI are given. New diagnostic challenges as a result of new treatment options are also discussed.

Postgraduate multidisciplinary development program: impact on the interpretation of pelvic MRI in patients with rectal cancer: a clinical audit in West Denmark

BACKGROUND

Pelvic MRI in patients with rectal cancer is an accepted tool for the identification of patients with poor prognostic tumors who may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. In Denmark, this examination has been mandatory in the workup on rectal cancer since 2002.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary team course for doctors in West Denmark on the technical quality, reporting, and interpretation of pelvic MRI in rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This study is interventional and observational. Two expert reviewers served as reference standard in the evaluation of consecutively performed pelvic MRI scans against which the evaluations from the participating centers were compared.

SETTINGS

Five imaging centers in West Denmark performed pelvic MRI in rectal cancer from March 1 to December 31, 2007.

PATIENTS

One hundred and eighty patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

This study involved a multidisciplinary team course including on-site visits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The MR scans were evaluated concerning technical performance, reporting, interpretation, and the ability to correctly allocate patients to chemoirradiation based on imaging findings pre- and postcourse.

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of the scans were of satisfying technical quality for staging rectal cancer before the course compared with 74% after (P < .001). After the course, the T-stage subclassification, the depth of extramural spread, the N stage, and the presence of extramural vascular invasion was reported significantly more frequently. Based on imaging findings, we observed no significant effect on the ability to perform correct treatment stratification according to Danish guidelines.

LIMITATIONS

The evaluation process itself may have improved the performance of the participating centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance and reporting of pelvic MRI in patients with rectal cancer can be improved significantly through multidisciplinary development courses and on-site visits, whereas improvements in image interpretation with regard to treatment stratification may demand more intensive efforts.

Can CT replace MRI in preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer?

The surgical circumferential resection margin in total mesorectal excision surgery is defined by the relationship of the tumor to the mesorectal fascia. Patients with anticipated tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia receive neoadjuvant therapy to downstage/downsize the tumor and to obtain tumor-free resection margins.Tumor relationship to the mesorectal fascia is accurately determined by MRI. Compared with MRI, multidetector-row computed tomography is more widely available, faster, less costly, and provides the ability to simultaneously assess the liver, peritoneum, and retroperitoneum for metastases.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of multidetector-row CT with conventional MRI in diagnosis of rectal cancer invasion of the mesorectal fascial envelope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 2-year period, all patients were enrolled in this study who had biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma and were referred, as a part of the routine preoperative staging workup, for a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis and also an MRI of the pelvis.All examinations were reviewed independently by 2 radiologists who were blinded from one another, from the findings of the other modality, and from clinical information. Both observers were dedicated abdominal radiologists who are experienced in reading pelvic CT and MRI. Categorical agreement between MRI and multidetector-row CT for all the evaluated parameters of the tumor position, mesorectal fascia, and lymph nodes, as well as the interobserver agreement between CT and MRI, was determined by the intraclass correlation weighted kappa statistic to measure the data set's consistency.

RESULTS

Among the study's 92 patients, the tumor characteristics suggested by multidetector-row CT agreed with those of MRI, with a weighted kappa ranging from 0.488 to 0.748 for the first reader and 0.577 to 0.800 for the second reader. Interobserver agreement ranged from 0.506 to 0.746.Agreement regarding mesorectal fascia characteristics differed significantly between multidetector-row CT and MRI, depending on the level of assessment. In the distal rectum, agreement was 0.207 for the first reader and 0.385 for the second reader. In the mid rectum, agreement was 0.420 and 0.527, respectively, and in the proximal rectum agreement was 0.508 and 0.520. Interobserver agreement was 0.737 at the distal level and 0.700 at the mid and proximal levels. Agreement regarding measurement of the distance from the tumor to the mesorectal fascia was 0.425 for the first reader and 0.723 for the second reader, with interobserver agreement of 0.766. Agreement in assessment of the number of lymph nodes ranged from 0.743 to 0.787 for the first reader and 0.754 to 0.840 for the second reader. Interobserver agreement ranged from 0.779 to 0.841. Agreement in assessment of the size of the lymph nodes ranged from 0.540 to 0.830 for the first reader and 0.850 to 0.940 for the second reader. Interobserver agreement ranged from 0.900 to 0.920. Agreement in assessment of the distance from nodes to the mesorectal fascia was 0.320 for the first reader and 0.401 for the second reader, with interobserver agreement of 0.950.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study differ from previously published data by demonstrating substantial agreement between readers in multidetector-row CT assessment of the tumor, mesorectal fascia, and lymph nodes. With the exceptions of mesorectal fascia in the distal rectum and the distance from the nodes to mesorectal fascia, other evaluated parameters were assessed with moderate and substantial agreement between multidetector-row CT and MRI. However, our findings suggest that multidetector-row CT does not correlate well enough with MRI findings to replace it in rectal cancer staging.

Tumor volume reduction rate measured by magnetic resonance volumetry correlated with pathologic tumor response of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether the tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) measured using three-dimensional region-of-interest magnetic resonance volumetry correlates with the pathologic tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study included 405 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-T4) who had undergone preoperative CRT and radical proctectomy. The tumor volume was measured using three-dimensional region-of-interest magnetic resonance volumetry before and after CRT but before surgery. We analyzed the correlation between the TVRR and the pathologic tumor response in terms of downstaging and tumor regression grade (TRG). Downstaging was defined as ypStage 0-I (ypT0-T2N0M0), and the TRG proposed by Dworak et al. was used.

RESULTS

The mean TVRR was 65.0% +/- 22.3%. Downstaging and complete regression occurred in 167 (41.2%) and 58 (14.3%) patients, respectively. The TVRRs according to ypT classification (ypT0-T2 vs. ypT3-T4), ypN classification (ypN0 vs. ypN1-N2), downstaging (ypStage 0-I vs. ypStage II-III), good regression (TRG 3-4 vs. TRG 1-2), and complete regression (TRG 4 vs. TRG 1-3) were all significantly different (p <.05). When the TVRR was categorized into three groups (<60%, 60-80%, and >80%), the rates of ypT0-T2, ypN0, downstaging, and good regression were all significantly greater for patients with a TVRR of >or=60%, as was the complete regression rate for patients with a TVRR >80% (p <.05).

CONCLUSION

The TVRR measured using three-dimensional region-of-interest magnetic resonance volumetry correlated significantly with the pathologic tumor response in terms of downstaging and TRG after preoperative CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Extended total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer (T4a) and the clinical role of MRI-evaluated neo-adjuvant downstaging

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical ability of MRl taken before and after neo-adjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to predict the necessary extension of TME (ETME) and the possibility to achieve a R0 resection.

METHOD

Prospective registration of 92 MRI evaluated T4a cancers undergoing elective surgery between 2002 and 2007 in a tertiary referral centre for multimodal treatment of rectal cancer.

RESULTS

MRI identified patients in need of neo-adjuvant treatment and predicted T-downstaging in 10% and N-downstaging in 59%. Seventy-nine percent R0 resections, 18% R1 and 3% R2 were obtained after ETME in 95% of the patients and TME in the rest. Higher tumour regression grade (TRG) was achieved in higher ypT-stage (P < 0.01). Preoperative chemo radiotherapy resulted in that more patients obtained TRG1-3 compared to those receiving radiotherapy (79% vs. 57%, P = 0.02). The pelvic wall was the area of failure in 70% of the R1 resections. Tumour cells outside the mesorectal fascia scattered within fibrosis was found in 18 TRG2-3 among 33 ypT4 tumours (55%).

CONCLUSION

MRl cannot discriminate tumour within fibrosis. Therefore, if a R0 resection is the goal, we advocate optimal surgery in accordance with the pre-treatment MRI. Post treatment MRI is a poor predictor of final histology and should not be relied upon to guide the extent of surgical resection. The study has initiated a new approach to histopathological classification of the removed specimen where we introduce a MRI assisted technique for investigating the areas at risk outside the mesorectal fascia in the specimen.

Magnetic resonance imaging in locoregional staging of rectal adenocarcinoma

A comprehensive overview of the current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the locoregional assessment and management of rectal adenocarcinoma is presented. Staging systems for rectal cancer and treatment strategies in its management are discussed to give the reader the context that shapes MRI acquisition techniques and interpretation. Findings on MRI are detailed and their accuracy reviewed based on currently available evidence. Optimization of MRI acquisition and relevant pelvic anatomy are reviewed. A detailed description of our approach in interpreting MRI for locoregional staging of rectal cancer is given and future directions are also introduced.

[Newer techniques in diagnostic imaging of colorectal carcinoma]

A wide spectrum of nowadays availible radiological and imaging methods in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer enabled not only the improvement of primary colorectal malignancy detection, precise staging, regional involvement and metastatic spread assessment, but also the posttherapeutical estimation and follow-up. Having in mind that the exact diagnostic assessment of colorectal carcinoma by use of different imaging modalities still raises a lots of contradictories, in this report we have tried to present the possibilities of newer imaging techniques in the diagnostic evaluation of the patients with colorectal cancer.

Prediction of rectal lymph node metastasis by pelvic computed tomography measurement

AIM

Rectal cancer staging represents a crucial step to select the best treatment for this tumour. Particularly after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), it may influence the surgical procedure (e.g. radical resection vs. local excision). The aim of this study was to determine the best lymph node size cut-off at computed tomography (CT) to predict nodal metastasis in rectal cancer patients with and without preoperative CRT.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients operated on for primary mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma, all staged with pelvic CT scan, were subdivided as follows: those who underwent surgery alone treatment without CRT (Group A) and those who underwent preoperative CRT (Group B). All CT scans were re-viewed by a single radiologist and, based on the lymph node size, findings were compared with pathologic lymph node status (pN). At each lymph node size cut-off value, the following were calculated: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The best cut-off value was defined as having an accuracy >or=70% with the highest NPV.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 162 patients: Group A (n=52) and Group B (n=110). Patients classified as pN-positive (n=45) had a higher number of and larger sized lymph nodes by CT scan than patients classified as pN-negative (n=117). The cut-off values with an accuracy >or=70% ranged between 7 and 11 mm in Group A and between 9 and 14 mm in Group B. The cut-off with the best NPV was 7 mm for Group A and 10mm for Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging the limitations of the dimensional criterion, lymph node size cut-off values found in our study may be useful for planning rectal cancer treatment using CT scan.

Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare prospectively between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the local staging of rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a recent 8-month period, both 3-T MRI with a phased array coil and MDCT scanner were used to preoperatively examine 31 consecutive patients. Preoperatively, the 3 experienced reviewers independently assessed the MRI and MDCT findings for the depth of tumor invasion into the rectal wall (T). Regional lymph node metastasis (N) was assessed by the 3 reviewers working in consensus. For T staging, we used a modified T staging (<or=T2, T3, and T4 staging). The results of the MRI and MDCT findings were compared based on the diagnosis of the resected specimens.

RESULTS

At histopathology, T1 was identified in 8 patients, T2 in 6, and T3 in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T2 staging or less between MRI and MDCT were 93% and 79%, 88% and 76%, and 91% and 77%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for T3 between MRI and MDCT were 92% and 73%, 93% and 83%, and 92% and 78%, respectively; there was a statistically significant difference for the T2 and T3 staging or less (P < 0.01). For N staging, MRI and CT can predict accurately in 88% and 77%, respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For local staging of rectal cancer, 3-T MRI is more accurate than MDCT for determining the depth of tumor invasion and the extent of lymph node metastasis.

Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT

PURPOSE

To audit the accuracy with which pre-operative MRI and multi-detector row CT determine the relationship between rectal tumour and the circumferential resection margin (CRM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MR and CT scans of 72 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were retrieved. The relationship between tumour and the mesorectal fascia was determined by two observers, who classified appearances into three categories: no tumour within 5 mm of the mesorectal fascia; tumour within 5 mm of the mesorectal fascia ('threatened' margin); tumour at the mesorectal fascia ('involved' margin). Agreement with post-operative histopathology was assessed by Kappa statistics.

RESULTS

There was poor agreement between both MRI and CT, and post-operative histology, both in all 72 patients and in the 42 who had received no pre-operative therapy or short-course radiotherapy only. Both imaging modalities had a tendency to overstage patients whose CRM was uninvolved subsequently. However, the negative predictive value for an uninvolved margin was 81.8% by MRI and 84.6% by CT. There was no patient with an involved margin by histopathology whose imaging had suggested the margin was uninvolved.

CONCLUSION

Both pre-operative MRI and multi-detector row CT have high negative predictive values for a subsequently uninvolved resection margin.

[External phased-array MR imaging preoperative assessment of rectal cancer]

The main problem associated with rectal cancer treatment is tumor recurrence. Randomized controlled studies have shown that adjuvant preoperative radiation therapy is effective for reducing local recurrence. These studies have also demonstrated that there are groups of rectal cancer patients with differing degrees of risk for local recurrence. At one end of the spectrum is the low-risk group: patients with superficial rectal cancer, who can be treated with surgery alone. At the other end is the high-risk group: patients with a close or involved resection margin at total mesorectal excision, the very advanced tumors that require a longer course of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and extensive surgery. Paramount for this selection and differentiated treatment is a reliable preoperative test that can be used to distinguish these groups of patients. In this review article, we will discuss the role of high-resolution phased array MRI among the other imaging modalities such as endorectal MRI, endorectal US, and CT. We will also discuss and illustrate MR imaging results in terms of T stage, circumferential resection margin, locally advanced rectal cancer, and N stage.

Preoperative imaging staging of rectal cancer

Carcinomas of the rectum are associated with a significant local and distant recurrence rate. Not all patients are appropriate candidates for preoperative radiation therapy. Preoperative identification of those most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy is important. There is no general consensus on the role of endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging patients with rectal cancer. Although the tumor stage is an important prognostic factor, preoperative assessment is associated with prediction of the circumferential resection margin. Newer developments such as coils, sequences and gradients in MRI, evolution of multidetector CT and new contrast media, allow for an algorithm selection aiming at the best diagnostic options for patients. The present review will discuss the current role of the various imaging modalities in staging carcinomas of the rectum.

The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We performed this study to prospectively evaluate the postchemoradiotherapy performance of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic biopsies for predicting the pathologic complete response of rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Four weeks after completion of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 46 consecutive patients with mid to low rectal cancer were prospectively evaluated by proctoscopy, TRUS, and pelvic CT scan and MRI. On the basis of T and N status, patients were classified as T0 or T1-4 and N-negative or N-positive. For each staging modality used, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated. Findings were compared with the pathologic tumor-node-metastasis stage.

RESULTS

On histopathologic analysis, 12 patients had pT0 and 34 had pT1-4 lesions; out of 45 assessable patients, 9 were N-positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in predicting T status (T0 vs. T >or=1) were 77%, 33%, 74%, 36%, and 64%, respectively, for TRUS; 100%, 0%, 74%, not assessable, and 74% for CT; and 100%, 0%, 77%, not assessable, and 77% for MRI. The corresponding figures in predicting N status (N-negative vs. N-positive) were, respectively, 37%, 67%, 21%, 81%, and 61% for TRUS; 78%, 58%, 32%, 91%, and 62% for CT; and 33%, 74%, 25%, 81%, and 65% for MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Current rectal cancer staging modalities after chemoradiotherapy allow good prediction of node-negative cases, although none of them is able to predict the pathologic complete response on the rectal wall.

An update on imaging of colorectal cancer

Screening of asymptomatic average-risk patients for presence of colon cancer and early detection in precursor stages is of great interest to general population. Comprehensive evaluation of symptomatic or high-risk patients represents another important clinical focus. Available techniques for total colon imaging, rectal cancer staging and the role of positron emission tomography are discussed.

New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy

MRI is being increasingly used in oncology for staging, assessing tumour response and also for treatment planning in radiotherapy. Both conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy requires improved means of defining target volumes for treatment planning in order to achieve its intended benefits. MRI can add to the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) process by providing excellent and improved characterization of soft tissues compared with CT. Together with its multiplanar capability and increased imaging functionality, these advantages for target volume delineation outweigh its drawbacks of lacking electron density information and potential image distortion. Efficient MR distortion assessment and correction algorithms together with image co-registration and fusion programs can overcome these limitations and permit its use for RTP. MRI developments using new contrast media, such as ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for abnormal lymph node identification, techniques such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion MRI to better characterize tissue and tumour regions as well as ultrafast volumetric or cine MR sequences to define temporal patterns of target and organ at risk deformity and variations in spatial location have all increased the scope and utility of MRI for RTP. Information from these MR developments may permit treatment individualization, strategies of dose escalation and image-guided radiotherapy. These developments will be reviewed to assess their current and potential use for RTP and precision high dose radiotherapy.

Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of MRI, using a pelvic phased-array coil and an endorectal coil, for preoperative local staging of rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients (26 males and 25 females) with adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent preoperative MRI and surgical resection of their tumors. Surgical pathology staging was compared to MRI staging (using the TNM classification) obtained both retrospectively by a reader blinded to surgical findings and prospectively (radiological reports). In addition, patients were stratified according to surgical treatment groups (stage I = T1-2/N0, stage II = T3/N0, stage III = Tx/N1-2).

RESULTS

At pathology, 36 of 51 (68%) tumors were classified as T0-T2, and 15 (32%) were classified as T3. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI readings for T3 staging were 93% and 86%, respectively (positive predictive value (PPV) = 74%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 97%, accuracy = 88%). MRI correctly predicted lymph node metastases in 11 of 13 patients with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 69% (PPV = 58%, NPV = 90%, accuracy = 74%). MRI correctly predicted surgical treatment groups in 33 of 39 (85%) patients. Interobserver agreement between the retrospective and prospective readings was excellent (kappa = 0.85) for prediction of T3 tumor and good (kappa = 0.80) for prediction of nodal involvement.

CONCLUSION

Combined endorectal and pelvic phased-array coil MRI can be used reliably to select which patients should receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy. It is highly predictive in terms of excluding T3 tumors, but still has limitations in predicting lymph node metastasis.

Pre-operative imaging of rectal cancer and its impact on surgical performance and treatment outcome

AIM

To discuss the ability of pre-operative MRI to have a beneficial effect on surgical performance and treatment outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

A description on how MRI can be used as a tool so select patients for differentiated neoadjuvant treatment, how it can be used as an anatomical road map for the resection of locally advanced cases, and how it can serve as a tool for quality assurance of both the surgical procedure and overall patient management. As an illustration the proportion of microscopically complete resections of the period 1993-1997, when there was no routine pre-operative imaging, is compared to that of the period 1998-2002, when pre-operative MR imaging was standardized.

RESULTS

The proportion of R0 resections increased from 92.5 to 97% (p=0.08) and the proportion of resections with a lateral tumour free margin of >1mm increased from 84.4 to 92.1% (p=0.03). The incomplete resections in the first period were mainly due to inadequate surgical management of unsuspected advanced or bulky tumours, whereas in the second period insufficient consideration was given to extensive neoadjuvant treatment when the tumour was close to or invading the mesorectal fascia on MR.

CONCLUSIONS

There are good indications that in our setting pre-operative MR imaging, along with other improvements in rectal cancer management, had a beneficial effect on patient outcome. Audit and discussion of the incomplete resections can lead to an improved operative and perioperative management.

Interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy has been used in cases of locally advanced rectal cancer to preserve sphincter function, decrease local recurrence, and improve survival. Preoperative staging is essential for planning and providing optimal therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of staging with magnetic resonance imaging and to define any factors that interfere in interpretation of images obtained after preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with biopsy-proven, locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative concomitant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and radiation, followed six to eight weeks later by radical surgery. Preoperative magnetic resonance images were reinterpreted by one radiologist and the results compared with histopathologic staging.

RESULTS

T-level downstaging occurred in 10 of 36 patients (28 percent), and N-level downstaging occurred in 29 of 36 patients (80 percent) after completion of chemoradiation therapy. Pathologic complete remission after chemoradiotherapy occurred in five patients (12 percent). Of the 36 patients, 17 (47 percent) were overstaged and 2 (6 percent) were understaged in T-level, whereas 10 patients (28 percent) were overstaged and 3 patients (8 percent) were understaged in N-level. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for determining depth of wall invasion was 47 percent, with 64 percent accuracy for nodal staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used in staging of pelvic malignancies because of its fine resolution, but chemoradiotherapy may decrease its accuracy. Thickening of the rectal wall after radiation by marked fibrosis, and peritumoral infiltration of inflammatory cells and vascular proliferation may contribute to overestimation of stage. By contrast, pathologic residual cancer beneath normal mural structure after chemoradiation therapy may result in understaging of rectal cancer.

Noninvasive competition for endoscopic ultrasound

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is one of the most significant developments in gastrointestinal (GI) imaging in recent years. EUS now plays a key role in the pretreatment staging of GI tract tumors and in the investigation of benign pancreaticobiliary pathology. It has not replaced conventional cross-sectional imaging (eg, ultrasound, CT, and MRI), but it has distinct properties and capabilities. EUS is most beneficial when used in a complementary fashion with cross-sectional and radionuclide imaging in the management of patients with GI tract disease. This article reviews the role of noninvasive imaging modalities in several clinical situations where EUS plays a prominent role.

Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging

One concern after rectal cancer surgery is the high local recurrence rate. Randomized trials have shown that the best local control rate for rectal cancer patients as a group is achieved after a short course of radiation therapy followed by optimal surgery. It is debatable, however, whether all patients with rectal cancer should undergo preoperative radiation therapy. Preoperative identification of those most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy is important. Therefore, the challenge for preoperative imaging in rectal cancer is to determine subgroups of patients with different risks for recurrence: those with superficial tumors, who can be treated with surgery alone; those with operable tumors and a wide circumferential resection margin, who can be treated with a short course of radiation therapy followed by total mesorectal excision; and those with advanced cancer and a close or involved resection margin, who require a long course of radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, and extensive surgery. So far, there is no consensus on the role of diagnostic imaging (endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) in the care of patients with primary rectal cancer. Preoperative staging has long relied on digital examination alone, which indicates that it has been difficult to achieve accuracy levels high enough for clinical decision making with preoperative imaging. In this review, the relevance of preoperative imaging in staging the local extent of primary rectal cancer will be discussed. Research on various imaging modalities, with an emphasis on MR, will be discussed under four main headings that address the most relevant aspects of local spread of rectal tumors: T stage, circumferential resection margin, locally advanced rectal cancer, and N stage.

Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

Historically, locally advanced rectal cancer is known for its dismal prognosis. The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is subject to continuous change due to development of new and better diagnostic tools, radiotherapeutic techniques, chemotherapeutic agents and understanding of the subject. It is clear, that a multimodality approach is the only way to achieve satisfactory local recurrence and survival rates in this type of cancer. However, which multimodality strategy is to be used still remains a point of controversy. This review summarises recent developments in imaging, (neo-) adjuvant therapy and surgical techniques in the treatment of primary locally advanced rectal cancer.

Retrospective measurement of different size parameters of non-radiated rectal cancer on MR images and pathology slides and their comparison

There are no non-invasive methods to assess the real tumor size in rectal cancer prior to surgery, especially following radio/chemotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging is gaining increasing acceptance as the primary modality at many centers for evaluation of pelvic malignancies including rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the tumor size as assessed by stereological or metric means on MRI correlates to the corresponding pathologic findings. To our knowledge, no such previous work has been reported in the literature. From the Cancer Register Center, 18 patients in the age range of 39-90 years with rectal cancer who had complete preoperative MR with subsequent giant section pathological examinations of the resected bowel were included. The tumor size was measured on MR and histopathologic specimen using both a stereologic and a metric mode. The measured parameters included the maximum transverse area occupied by the tumor, thickness, width, and the length of tumor and the volume of the tumor measured in two different fashions by the product of area and length (al) or the product of thickness, width, and length (twl). The depth of tumor infiltration (T) and presence of local lymph node metastases (N) were also separately evaluated on the histopathologic specimen. There were 1, 4, 12, and 1 patients with tumor stages T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The mean thickness, width, length, area, and volumes, al and twl, were 1.62, 2.8, and 4.78 cm, and 4.72 cm2, 26.29 cm3, and 20.07 cm3, respectively. Regression curves were drawn for above-mentioned parameters. They showed some correlation with square correlation coefficient measuring between 0.38 and 0.82. The best correlation was seen for area (0.75) and volume measured by the product of area and length of the tumor (0.82). With the formula proposed from this material, we assume that rectal tumors can be measured on MR images using a metric model, especially area and the volume (the product of area and length), and then extrapolated to what we would expect from pathology, hence providing us with a tool where we could measure tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy.

Comparison of CT and MRI in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma and prediction of circumferential resection margin involvement by MRI

OBJECTIVE

It has been suggested that MRI may be used as the sole modality of choice in pre-operative staging in rectal cancers. Knowledge of tumour stage and a threatened Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) pre-operatively are essential for planning neo-adjuvant therapy and as predictors of local recurrence. At present most units utilize CT scanning to assess these parameters. The aim of our study was two fold: firstly to examine the accuracy of preop CT and MRI staging of rectal cancers compared with final histology and secondly to assess the accuracy of MRI in predicting penetration of the mesorectal envelope (ME).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with biopsy proven rectal adenocarcinoma underwent thin slice MRI and CT scan pre-operatively. Forty-seven patients have been prospectively entered into the study: 24 male (median age 68 years; range 38-91 years). Eleven patients were unsuitable for surgery leaving 36 patients available for study.

RESULTS

CT correctly staged patients with T1/T2 rectal cancers more often than MRI (77% vs. 43%, P = 0.226). Patients with T1/T2 tumours were overstaged more often by MRI compared with CT (54% vs. 23%, P = 0.226). A greater proportion of patients with T3 tumours were correctly staged by MRI than CT (76% vs. 41%, P = 0.08); and more T3 disease was understaged by CT than MRI (54 vs. 18%, P = 0.032). CT and MRI staged T4 disease equally. In the assessment of mesorectal envelope integrity, MRI had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 84%. The positive predictive value was 44% and the negative predictive value 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest significant differences between accurate pre-operative "T" staging by CT and MRI for rectal cancer. MRI has the potential however, to accurately assess mesorectal envelope invasion. Further analysis is required to assess whether MRI can be used as the sole modality in pre-operative staging of rectal cancers.

Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer--computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Cross-sectional imaging techniques are increasingly being used in the preoperative evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have been improved with significant advances of the technological hard- and software. This has contributed to high patient acceptance due to shorter examination times and more open configuration of the systems, consistent high quality images with better delineation of the normal abdomino-pelvic anatomy and pathology. New techniques such as CT-colonography have emerged from a research application to a clinical tool which can be used in different clinical settings. Phased-array receiver coils have significantly increased the usefulness of MR in the evaluation of rectal neoplasms due to the high resolution that can be obtained. New organ specific contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging have facilitated the preoperative evaluation of liver metastases in favour of more invasive techniques with similar sensitivities. However, preoperative staging criteria for colorectal cancer using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging has to be updated and the results of new techniques have to be confirmed in large trials. In the future, further development of CT and MR may offer 'one-stop-shopping' protocols for both diagnosis, local and distant staging of colorectal cancer. Diffusion weighted MR-imaging, in vivo spectroscopy as well as further targeted imaging, such as with lymph node specific agents for MR may also prove to be helpful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer.

[Cancer of the rectum: target volumes for preoperative radiotherapy]

Preoperative radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable rectal adenocarcinoma. The total mesorectal excision leads to a dramatic increase of local control rate. Thus, the mesorectal space is the usual field for the spread of rectal cancers cells. It could therefore be considered as the clinical target volume (CTV) in the preoperative conformational radiotherapy. From the anatomical basis and radiological contributions, we propose several CTVs for different locations of rectal carcinoma.