Successful orthotopic liver transplantation for lamivudine-associated YMDD mutant hepatitis B virus

Is hepatitis B immunoglobulin necessary in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation? A meta-analysis

Background & Aims

Application of nucleoside analogues and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) has reduced hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate after liver transplantation (LT) dramatically. Recent data suggests therapy without HBIG is also effective. We sought to evaluate the necessity of HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LT.

Methods

A meta-analysis was performed. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and other databases were searched for eligible literatures. The major end points were recurrence rate, patient survival, and YMDD mutant. Risk difference (RD) or risk ratio (RR) was calculated to synthesize the results.

Results

Nineteen studies with a total of 1484 patients were included in this analysis. Application of HBIG was helpful to reduce HBV recurrence [P<0.001; RD = 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.12, 0.20)] and virus mutants [P<0.001; RR = 3.13; 95%CI (1.86–5.26)], it also improved patients' 1-year [P = 0.03; RD = 0.08; 95%CI (0.01, 0.15)] and 3-year survival rates [P = 0.005; RD = 0.17; 95%CI(0.05, 0.28)]. No significant difference was found for patients' 5-year survival [P = 0.46; RD = −0.06; 95%CI (−0.21, 0.10)]. Sub-group analysis showed that in patients with positive pre-operative HBV DNA status, HBIG was necessary to reduce HBV recurrence rate (P<0.001; RD = 0.42; 95%CI (0.32, 0.52)). In patients with negative HBV DNA, combined therapy gained no significant advantages (P = 0.18; RD = 0.06; 95%CI (−0.03, 0.14)). Non-Lamivudine (non-LAM) antiviral drugs performed as well as combination therapy in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LT (P = 0.37; RD = 0.06; 95%CI (−0.02, 0.14)).

Conclusions

HBIG with nucleoside analogues is helpful to reduce HBV recurrence and virus mutants. The necessity of HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LT when using new potent nucleoside analogues, especially for patients with negative pre-transplant HBV DNA status remains to be evaluated.

The effect of pretransplantation lamivudine resistance on the prognosis of liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of lamivudine to treat chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the prevalence of lamivudine resistance is increasing among orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) candidates in Korea.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of pre-OLT lamivudine-resistance on the post-OLT prognosis of recipients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive OLT recipient at a single tertiary care center (n = 8) between September 1999 and August 2009 were tested preoperatively for genotypic lamivudine resistance. We compared overall survival as well as incidences of graft failure, recurrent hepatitis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between patients with (n = 35) versus without (n = 46) lamivudine-resistance.

RESULTS

Mortality occurred in 2 resistant and 3 nonresistant individuals. The occurrences of graft failure, recurrent hepatitis, and HCC were 1, 2, and 2 cases, respectively, in the resistance group versus 2, 2, and 2 cases, respectively, in the nonresistance cohort. Univariate analysis showed no significant difference in survival, graft failure, HCC occurrence, and recurrent hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that pre-OLT lamivudine-resistance did not significantly affect the post-OLT prognosis. Thus, lamivudine-resistance may not be a barrier when considering OLT in patients with underlying CHB as a therapeutic modality, if it is treated with appropriate antiviral agents.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Liver Transplantation Setting; The Rising Concerns and Growing Hopes, Report From 10th Congress of the Iranian Society for Organ Transplantation, 2011, Shiraz, Iran

Hepatitis B infection is the main cause of liver related mortality in many countries including Iran. Liver transplantation in cirrhosis due to HBV infection before 1990 was an absolute contraindication. Recurrent infection was a significant event in post liver transplant setting and resulted in increased risk of graft failure and death except successful transplanted individuals. Advances in antiviral prophylaxis have now made graft reinfection majority patients as a rare event. Graft and patient survival have been improved significantly during the past two decades, and consequences of transplantation for hepatitis B virus are now superior to those achieved for most other indications. This has encouraged many centers including the major liver transplantation center of Iran, in Shiraz, to provide liver transplantation to more patients with HBV related end stage liver disease. Management of these patients begins before transplantation along with special care after transplantation. There are some myths and doubts in the management of these patients and one should always balance the cost and efficiency. One of the major concerns is the high economic and social cost of recurrence and all possible efforts should be performed to avoid the ominous consequences of reinfection. Having a clear scientific grasp on the management of HBV cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation, options and protocols, and changing the concept which HBV infected are contraindicated ones for liver transplantation, and future hopes in increasing patients survival after liver transplantation using the new nucleosides analogues and availability of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in the transplantation setting. This scientific report paper outlines the insights communicated at the HBV and liver transplantation symposium during 10th Congress of the Iranian Society for Organ Transplantation, May 2011, Shiraz, Iran.

Decision analysis model for hepatitis B prophylaxis one year after liver transplantation

In patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation, hepatitis B recurrence rates have decreased significantly with the use of various methods for prophylaxis. At present, a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine is the standard of care, resulting in recurrence rates of 0% to 11%. Recent data suggest that the addition of adefovir to lamivudine is successful in treating patients with recurrent hepatitis B infection. A Markov model was used to compare costs and outcomes of 2 strategies for hepatitis B prophylaxis 1 year after transplantation. The first consisted of prophylaxis with lamivudine and adefovir (strategy 1), whereas the second consisted of intramuscular HBIG and lamivudine (strategy 2) with the addition of adefovir in patients who subsequently developed hepatitis B recurrence. Patients who failed with adefovir and lamivudine were then treated with tenofovir and entecavir. 16.8% of liver transplant recipients had hepatitis B recurrence after 10 years of treatment with lamivudine and HBIG. The medical costs for strategy 1 and strategy 2 after 10 years of therapy were $151,819 and $166,246, respectively, and this resulted in cost savings of $14,427. The decision analysis model began 1 year after liver transplantation. A 1-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to cost changes of adefovir and HBIG injections as well as variations in the hepatitis B virus recurrence rate. The model was robust to costs of lamivudine, laboratory costs, administrative fees, and office visit fees. Our decision analysis model resulted in marked savings in costs with strategy 1 (lamivudine and adefovir), providing pharmacoeconomic support for the use of this strategy as first-line therapy in hepatitis B prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients 1 year after liver transplantation.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL)

The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up a working party on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in 2004, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of ACLF relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. Experts predominantly from the Asia-Pacific region constituted this working party and were requested to identify different issues of ACLF and develop the consensus guidelines. A 2-day meeting of the working party was held on January 22-23, 2008, at New Delhi, India, to discuss and finalize the consensus statements. Only those statements that were unanimously approved by the experts were accepted. These statements were circulated to all the experts and subsequently presented at the Annual Conference of the APASL at Seoul, Korea, in March 2008. The consensus statements along with relevant background information are presented in this review.

Lamivudine or lamivudine combined with hepatitis B immunoglobulin in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis

There is a controversy over whether the different outcomes of prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence are attributable to different treatments. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate lamivudine monotherapy and combined therapy of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in HBV infected liver recipients. A fixed effects model was used for statistical pooling of relative risks (RR) for the different outcomes. Six articles (551 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences were observed between lamivudine monotherapy and lamivudine + HBIG therapy in hepatitis B recurrence [P < 0.0001; RR = 0.38; 95% CI (0.25, 0.58)], YMDD mutant [P = 0.002; RR = 0.40; 95% CI (0.23, 0.72)] and hepatitis B recurrence in HBV-DNA positive patients before orthotopic liver transplantation [P < 0.00001; RR = 0.31; 95% CI (0.21, 0.45)]. No significant differences were observed in patient survival [P = 0.59; RR = 1.02; 95% CI (0.95, 1.09)], graft survival [P = 0.56; RR = 1.02; 95% CI (0.95, 1.09)] and diseases leading to death between the two groups [HBV recurrence leading to death: P = 0.05; RR = 0.47; 95% CI (0.22, 1.02); hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence leading to death: P = 0.13; RR = 0.34; 95% CI (0.09, 1.36)]. In conclusion, combination of lamivudine and HBIG can effectively decrease the recurrence rate of HBV and the incidence of YMDD mutant, but it can not improve patient survival and graft survival significantly. Well-designed large-sample trials are needed to evaluate the efficiency of combined therapy of lamivudine and HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence in liver graft recipients.

Human monoclonal antibody against Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the main pathogens responsible for hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Human plasma-derived Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is being used for prophylactic and liver transplantation currently. However, it may be necessary to replace a HBIG with a recombinant one because of limited availability of human plasma with high anti-HBsAg antibody titer and possible contamination of human pathogens. A Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line, HB-C7A, was established which produces a fully human IgG1 that binds HBsAg. The HB-C7A exhibits approximately 2600 units/mg of antibody. The affinity (K(a)) of HB-C7A is 1.1 x 10(8) M(-1) by Biacore analysis and estimated 6.7-fold higher than that of Hepabig (a plasma-derived HBIG from Green Cross Corp., Yongin, Korea) by competition ELISA. The HB-C7A recognizes the conformational "a" determinant of HBsAg and binds HBV particle more efficiently than the Hepabig. The HB-C7A binds to HBV-infected human liver tissue but does not bind to normal human tissues. This HB-C7A has several advantages compared to plasma-derived Hepabig such as activity, safety and availability.

[Liver transplantation for complications of hepatitis B]

In the absence of prophylaxis, there is an elevated risk of virus recurrence after liver transplantation required because of chronic hepatitis B. Regardless of prophylaxis, the risk of recurrence is associated with pre-graft viral load. Long-term prophylaxis by hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) significantly reduces the risk of recurrence, especially if there was no pre-graft viral replication. Use of antiviral agents such as lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir, and entecavir, control HBV replication in patients with decompensation of cirrhosis while awaiting transplantation and in patients with HBV recurrence post-graft. The risk of emergence of resistant strains limits the use of these antiviral agents. The choice of one or several combined antiviral agents depends on their resistance profiles. Combining antiviral agents and HBIG after transplantation can reduce the risk of HBV recurrence to less than 10%, even in patients with viral replication pre-graft. If there was no detectable viral load pre-graft, withdrawal of HBIG should be considered at some point, while continuing an antiviral agent or after anti-HBV vaccination.

Early reduction of infected hepatocytes by activated immunity at the time of interferon withdrawal hepatitis followed by lamivudine administration resulted in higher seroconversion in hepatitis Be antigen-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

It has been found that the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) therapy can be improved by preceding administration with a short course of corticosteroid that induces a flare of the disease upon its withdrawal. Because of the side effects of corticosteroid, we tested the effect of a short course of interferon (IFN) as the primer instead of prednisolone, which was followed by LAM when the hepatitis flare occurred. The incidence of LAM resistance mutations and the effect of core promoter and precore mutations on the durability of the responses were also studied.

METHODS

Patients treated with interferon (IFN)-LAM therapy (n=73) were compared to those treated with IFN alone (n=117). The IFN-LAM group received IFN-alpha MU/day, t.i.w. for a 3-month period. LAM (10mg/day during 1 year) was started when IFN withdrawal hepatitis occurred during 2-10 months after stopping IFN. The LAM-resistant, core promoter, and precore mutations were examined by sequencing.

RESULTS

(1) The IFN-LAM group developed exacerbated hepatitis following IFN withdrawal in 63 patients before starting LAM therapy. The seroconversion (SC) rate was significantly higher in the IFN-LAM group than in the IFN-alone group (61% vs 26%, P=0.0001). (2) The LAM resistance mutation rate was 31% at 1 year after initiating LAM therapy. (3) In a stepwise discriminant-function analysis, decreased level of HBeAg determined at 4 weeks after LAM administration and increased level of HBeAb before the start of LAM administration contributed significantly on seroconversion to anti-HBe (P = 0.0073 and 0.004, respectively). (4) The reappearance rate of HBeAg within 6 months after the therapy (relapse) was 33% in the IFN-LAM group and 10% in the IFN-alone group. The prevalence of core promoter and precore mutations did not change before and after the therapy, nor did these mutations correlate with the relapse after stopping IFN-LAM therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Our findings suggest that early reduction of infected hepatocytes expressed by HBeAg by LAM may contribute to a high SC rate of IFN-LAM therapy. (2) The emergence of LAM-resistant mutations was similar to the previously reported rate, and neither core promoter nor precore mutations correlated with relapse of seroconverters after IFN-LAM withdrawal.

Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation using lamivudine or lamivudine combined with hepatitis B Immunoglobulin prophylaxis

The aim of our study was to determine the outcomes of liver transplant recipients receiving either lamivudine (LAM) monotherapy or LAM combined with low-dose intramuscular (IM) hepatitis B Immunoglobulin (HBIG) therapy. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients that had had liver transplantation in a single center for HBV-related liver diseases from December 1999 to June 2004. A total of 165 patients received LAM monotherapy (51 patients) or combined prophylaxis (114 patients) post-liver transplantation (LT) with a mean follow-up of 20.13 months. Hepatitis B relapsed in 21 patients of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers who received LAM monotherapy, with a 1- and 2-yr actuarial risk of 27.4% and 39.7%. Recurrence occurred in 16 patients of 114 patients receiving the combined prophylaxis, with a 1- and 2-yr recurrence rate of 13.5% and 15.2% (P = 0.024). A total of 25 cases (67.6%) with YMDD mutants were detected in all the 37 patients, 14 cases (66.7%) in the monotherapy group and 11 cases (68.8%) in the combination group. In conclusion, LAM and low-dose intramuscular HBIG treatment demonstrates a better result than LAM monotherapy, as prophylaxis against post-LT reinfection of the graft, but the safety and efficacy as a substitution for high-dose intravenous HBIG with LAM needs to be investigated further.

Liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine-resistant YMDD mutant using add-on adefovir dipivoxil plus lamivudine

Lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may improve clinical state and suppress viral replication before liver transplantation. Emergence of lamivudine-resistant YMDD mutant is common. We report the results of liver transplantation in 16 patients with pretransplantation YMDD mutants after receiving lamivudine treatment for a median of 738 days (range, 400-1799 days). Adefovir dipivoxil (10 mg daily) was added on to lamivudine for a median of 20 days (range, 8-271 days) before (n = 11) or at (n = 5) liver transplantation, and the combination was continued indefinitely thereafter. Eight patients received additional intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) for a median of 24 months. Fifteen patients with known pre-adefovir HBV DNA levels had a median titer of 14,200 x 10(3) copies/mL (2 x 10(3) to 4,690,000 x 10(3) copies/mL), and 14 had HBV DNA >10(5) copies/mL. All but 1 patient remained positive for HBV DNA (by quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR]) at the time of liver transplantation, and the titer was greater than10(5) copies/mL in 8 patients. The median follow-up after liver transplantation was 21.1 (range, 4.4-68.9) months. One patient (6%) died of an unrelated cause 12.2 months after transplantation, and 15 patients (94%) were alive with the original graft. All patients cleared HBV DNA and had no detectable HBV DNA by qPCR at the latest follow-up. Fourteen patients had cleared hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), but 2 patients who received only adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine without HBIG remained HBsAg positive after 7.7 and 9.5 months. Serum HBV DNA, however, was negative, and there was no biochemical or histological evidence of recurrence. Adefovir dipivoxil was well tolerated with no significant renal toxicity. In conclusion, a combination of add-on adefovir dipivoxil plus lamivudine therapy provides effective prophylaxis in patients with pretransplantation YMDD mutant that may be actively replicating. The cost effectiveness of additional passive immunoprophylaxis remains to be defined.

Effect of lamivudine treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to anti-HBe positive/HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Lamivudine has been shown to improve liver function and reduce the need for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with decompensated HBeAg-positive cirrhosis. Nevertheless, there is only limited experience with lamivudine in patients with anti-HBe-positive/HBeAg-negative cirrhosis. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether lamivudine treatment improves liver function and subsequently pre-LT survival or delays or obviates the need for LT in patients with anti-HBe-positive/HBeAg-negative cirrhosis. Between July 1998 and June 2003, 20 consecutive patients awaiting LT were enrolled in the study. All patients showed active viral replication and were treated with lamivudine 100 mg daily. Significant clinical improvement, defined as a decrease in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score by >or=2 points, was observed in 11 (55%) patients. The median change in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score was -2 (range -5 to +2). The median time required to achieve a 2-point or greater reduction in Child-Pugh-Turcotte score was 6 months (range 3-12 months). In nine patients (45%), the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score decreased to <or=6 (Child's class A cirrhosis). At last follow-up, 14 (70%) patients were alive and waiting for LT, with a median LT-free survival of 36 months (range 12-63 months). One patient (5%) developed resistance to lamivudine with reappearance of HBV DNA after 48 months of treatment. In conclusion, our results provide further evidence to the notion that lamivudine is beneficial in patients with decompensated anti-HBe-positive/HBeAg-negative cirrhosis caused by actively replicating chronic hepatitis B.

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in carriers of lamivudine-resistant mutants

The combination of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, the efficacy of this strategy and the need for combined therapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in patients who select lamivudine-resistant strains (YMDD) before surgery is still unknown. Twenty-two patients treated with lamivudine (LAM) who underwent LT after YMDD-mutant selection were studied. In 13 patients, YMDD mutants were associated with an HBV DNA breakthrough greater than 5 log10 (group A: phenotypic resistance), and 11 were treated with ADV to decrease viral load before LT. In the remaining 9 patients who did not experience the viral breakthrough, YMDD mutants were detected only retrospectively in sera stored at the time of LT (group B: genotypic resistance). During 35 months of post-LT follow-up, none of the 11 patients of group A treated with ADV before and after surgery (in addition to HBIG and LAM) had HBV recurrence, and neither did any of the 7 subjects of group B treated with LAM before and after transplantation (in addition to HBIG). HBV recurred in 2 patients of group A (untreated with ADV before surgery and transplanted with an HBV DNA exceeding 5 log10) and in 2 subjects of group B (who spontaneously stopped HBIG after surgery). In carriers of YMDD mutants, the risk of post-LT HBV recurrence is low, provided that preemptive and prophylactic ADV (in addition to LAM and HBIG) treatment is used in highly viremic patients and prophylactic LAM (or ADV) and HBIG therapy is continued in low viremic patients.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C after liver transplantation. Part 1, hepatitis B

The outcome of OLT for HBV-related liver disease is dependent on the prevention of allograft re-infection. Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the management of HBV transplant candidates. The advent of long-term hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) administration as a prophylaxis against HBV recurrence, and the introduction of new antiviral agents against HBV infection, such as lamivudine (LAM), were a major breakthrough in the management of these patients. Results of OLT for HBV infection are similar to those achieved with other indications. Pre-OLT antiviral treatment such as LAM can suppress HBV replication before OLT and thus decrease the risk of re-infection of the graft. Combination prophylaxis with LAM and HBIG after transplantation highly effectively reduces the rate of HBV re-infection, even in HBV replicative cirrhotic patients. The optimal HBIG protocol in the LAM era is yet to be defined: dosing of HBIG, routes of administration, and possibility of stopping HBIG. Several antiviral drugs have been developed for the management of HBV infection on the graft, so outcome is currently good.

Management of HBV Infection in Liver Transplantation Patients

In the absence of preventative therapy, reinfection of allografts with hepatitis B virus (HBV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) resulted in dismal allograft and patient survival. Major advances in the management of HBV-infected recipients of OLT during the past 15 years have steadily reduced the rate of reinfection, resulting in improved outcomes. Initially, long-term use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) as a source of anti-HBs antibodies was effective in preventing or delaying reinfection. Lamivudine monotherapy made it possible to suppress HBV replication prior to OLT, markedly decreasing the risk of reinfection. Although lamivudine monotherapy used before and after OLT could prevent reinfection, its effectiveness was limited by progressive development of lamivudine-resistant mutant infections. Combination therapy with HBIG and lamivudine after OLT reduced both HBV recurrence and the risk of lamivudine resistance even in patients with active HBV replication. Introduction of adefovir provided a safe, alternative oral antiviral able to treat effectively lamivudine-resistant mutants HBV. Available strategies to prevent reinfection have resulted in OLT outcomes for HBV-infected patients comparable to those for patients transplanted for non-HBV indications. In the future, combination therapies of HBIG and both nucleoside and/or nucleotide agents will undoubtedly be optimized. Development of new drugs to treat HBV will increase opportunities to combine agents to enhance safety, efficacy and prevent emergence of HBV escape mutants. New vaccines and adjuvants may make it possible to generate anti-HBs in immunosuppressed patients, eliminating the need for HBIG.

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis viruses has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for approximately 50% of LT in the United States and Europe. Despite the decrease in the number of new HCV infections, the prevalence of advanced HCV-related liver disease is steadily increasing. In light of the near universal recurrence of posttransplantation HCV infection and our limited ability to treat recurrent disease, transplantation is in danger of being overrun by viral hepatitis, unless effective strategies can be used to treat disease, expand the donor pool of available organs, and prevent disease recurrence. In the early 1980s, results of LT for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were hampered by recurrent infection and subsequent allograft failure. However, with the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and treatment with potent nucleoside analogs, there has been a resurgence of LT for hepatitis B virus-related ESLD. Despite the wide acceptance of LT as a therapy for ESLD, there is little consensus on the appropriate immunosuppressive regimens, and prophylactic and therapeutic treatments vary widely from one center to another. This review summarizes available data and highlights appropriate strategies to improve outcomes.

Evolving strategies to prevent HBV recurrence

1. Long-term prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) significantly reduces the risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence and increases survival. Patients with HBV cirrhosis and / or positive HBV DNA at the time of transplantation have a high risk for recurrence despite HBIG prophylaxis. 2. Pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) antiviral treatment using lamivudine (LAM) can suppress HBV replication before transplantation and may induce clinical improvement in a subset of patients. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) may serve as "rescue" therapy for patients with LAM resistance; its place as first-line therapy requires further evaluation. 3. Combination prophylaxis with LAM and HBIG prevents HBV recurrence in 90% to 100% of patients who undergo transplantation for hepatitis B. The optimal HBIG protocol in the "nucleoside-nucleotide analog era" remains to be determined. The place of ADV or LAM as first-line posttransplant antiviral therapy in combination with HBIG requires further studies. 4. Future research should test new protocols using lower HBIG doses given intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM) alone or in combination with antiviral agents and identify patients in whom HBIG prophylaxis can be stopped safely or replaced by antiviral agents or vaccination.

Comparison of clinical outcome between patients continuing and discontinuing lamivudine therapy after biochemical breakthrough of YMDD mutants

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between patients continuing and discontinuing lamivudine therapy after the biochemical breakthrough of hepatitis B virus tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutant.

METHODS

YMDD mutants were detected in 51 chronic hepatitis B patients who experienced a flare-up of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) during lamivudine treatment. Twenty-seven of them discontinued lamivudine therapy (group A), and 24 continued therapy (group B) after biochemical breakthrough. The follow-up period was 12 months in both the groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups A and B in the incidence and severity of ALT peaks and hepatic decompensation within the first 3 months after biochemical breakthrough. After the fourth month of biochemical breakthrough, however, group A experienced acute exacerbation more frequently [20/26 (77%) vs. 7/23 (30%); P=0.002] and higher ALT peaks than group B. The same result was found when the patients were divided into naïve and retreated or cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups. Hepatic decompensation at the onset of biochemical breakthrough was associated with higher mortality (OR=70, 95% CI=6.06-807.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who discontinued lamivudine therapy increased the frequency of flare-ups and higher ALT peaks than those who continued therapy after 4 months post-breakthrough.

Liver transplant and recurrent disease

Current prophylactic measures have greatly reduced recurrence rates of hepatitis B after liver transplantation. HBIG remains a critically important compound and although there is variability in dosing regimens and target anti-HBs levels, it is the backbone of recurrence prevention. Adjuvant therapies with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs alone have been limited by drug-resistant strains of HBV, but the armamentarium of these molecules continues to grow and hence the management of the post-LT HBV patient will evolve further. Currently lamivudine with HBIG remains an excellent option provided the patient has not developed resistance, especially in the pre-LT period. Adefovir is the drug of choice in that setting and perhaps the preferred drug in the pre-LT setting to allow the use of lamivudine post-LT. Further testing with tenofovir and newer compounds in development will expand these options. The use of multiple nucleoside analogs is an intriguing option, based on the HIV experience of reducing drug resistance and optimizing viral suppression, and will likely be further studied.

Nucleoside analogues and other antivirals for treatment of hepatitis B in the peritransplant period

Chronic HBV infection is a common cause of advanced liver disease that is associated with substantial mortality. Furthermore, chronic hepatitis B was historically a controversial indication for liver transplantation because of a low post-transplant survival, with graft infection being the major contributor to adverse outcomes. The initial use of hepatitis B immune globulin as prophylaxis, followed later by combined therapy with lamivudine, markedly reduced viral recurrence and improved the survival of patients transplanted for acute or chronic hepatitis B with liver failure. Lamivudine alone can also be used for long-term prophylaxis against de novo HBV infection that can be transmitted by organs from donors positive for anti-HBc or anti-HBs. When used in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis, lamivudine has been shown to improve clinical manifestations, prolong pretransplant survival, and defer, or even obviate, the need for transplantation. Despite prophylaxis, viral mutations with breakthrough reinfection may occur and lead to liver failure. The recently approved adefovir dipivoxil, which is active against lamivudine-resistant mutation, and other nucleoside analogs that are in various phases of development, offer hope as rescue therapy for viral recurrence. Other therapeutic alternatives in the future may include gene therapy and immune interventions.

Hepatitis B immune globulin preparations and use in liver transplantation

Hepatitis B immune globulin remains a central component of prophylaxis in HBV-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation. HBIG monotherapy given at a high dosage and indefinitely can prevent recurrence in 65% to 80% of patients. Because treatment failures occur and combination therapy using HBIG plus a nucleoside analog is more uniformly effective, the current standard of care is combination HBIG plus a nucleoside analog. These combination protocols have reduced the rate of virologic breakthrough to 10% or less. Several questions remain. The optimal dose and duration of HBIG use is unclear. Moreover, the development of resistance to lamivudine (and other nucleoside analogs) before transplantation increases the risk for virologic breakthrough post-transplantation. For patients with pre-transplant evidence of active HBV replication caused by the presence of nucleoside analog resistance, HBIG may be the main or only form of prophylaxis. For these patients, HBIG doses sufficient to maintain anti-HBs titers comparable to the days of HBIG monotherapy seem warranted. New HBIG formulations have made anti-HBs therapy more safe and tolerable to patients but the cost of the drug remains significant. The cost factor is particularly important in developing countries or countries with more limited resources for management of liver transplant recipients. Thus, there remains a need to develop and test new forms of anti-HBs therapy, so that effective but less expensive forms of immunoprophylaxis can be made available.

Prevention of and treatment for hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation in the nucleoside analogues era

Post-transplant prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has significantly reduced hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rates, but it is rather ineffective in patients with pretransplant viremia. Moreover, long-term HBIG administration is very expensive and may be associated with emergence of escape HBV mutants. Lamivudine has been widely used in the management of HBV transplant patients. Pretransplant lamivudine lowers HBV viremia, decreasing the risk of post-transplant HBV recurrence, but to try and minimize development of resistant HBV strains, it should start within the last 6 months of the anticipated transplantation timing. Preemptive post-transplant lamivudine monotherapy is associated with progressively increasing HBV recurrence rates, but combined therapy with lamivudine and HBIG at relatively low dosage is currently the most effective approach in this setting, even in HBV-DNA-positive patients, who also receive lamivudine in the pretransplant period. The most frequent therapy for post-transplant HBV recurrence is lamivudine, but the increasing resistance rates represent a rather challenging problem. Adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir are currently the most promising agents for lamivudine-resistant HBV strains. All these advances in anti-HBV therapy have made HBV liver disease an indication for liver transplantation irrespective of viral replication status, a complete turn around from 10 years ago.

Prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease in Asia. The results of liver transplantation in these patients have significantly improved to a level comparable to those of other recipients as a result of the rapid evolution in the strategies of prevention and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B over the past decade. Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine, either alone or in combination, are effective in preventing reinfection, but the most cost-effective dosing regimen with optimum efficacy without the prohibitive cost remains to be determined, an issue that is particularly relevant to liver transplant centers with serious financial constraints in Asia. The idea of active immunization is attractive, but the results have been conflicting to date. The newer nucleoside analogs appear most promising, and a combination of two or more antiviral agents is likely to represent the future strategy of choice in the prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation.

Recent advances in liver transplantation

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.

Conversion from intravenous to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine is safe and cost-effective in patients receiving long-term prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation was previously frequent and associated with significant allograft failure and mortality. Recurrence rates of hepatitis B were improved with the use of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin, and later, lamivudine monotherapy. Combination prophylaxis with intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine substantially decreased rates of hepatitis B recurrence, but intravenous administration of hepatitis B immune globulin was expensive and associated with significant adverse effects. In the current study, 59 patients receiving primary liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B infection were prospectively followed up after converting from intravenous to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine. All patients tolerated intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin well. At a median follow-up of 511 days after conversion to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin, 58 of 59 patients (98.3%) were hepatitis B surface antigen-negative. Twenty-one patients (35.6%) required a median of one supplemental intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin infusion to maintain therapeutic antibody levels. Economic analysis showed an average cost-effectiveness ratio for combination intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin plus lamivudine of $52,600 per recurrence prevented, which was far below the cost of lamivudine monotherapy and of intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin alone or in combination with lamivudine. These results suggest that intramuscular administration of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine offers a safe, effective, and cost-effective approach to preventing hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Prevention of recurrent hepatitis B post-liver transplantation

1. Factors associated with a lower rate of recurrent hepatitis B post-liver transplantation (LT) are negative hepatitis B e antigen and/or serum hepatitis B virus DNA pre-LT, hepatitis D virus superinfection, and fulminant hepatitis B. 2. Long-term intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) monotherapy can reduce the overall rate of recurrent hepatitis B to 20% to 35%. 3. Long-term lamivudine monotherapy is associated with a risk for drug resistance and overall 3-year rate of recurrent hepatitis B of 40% to 50%. 4. Combination prophylaxis with HBIG and lamivudine can reduce the overall rate of recurrent hepatitis B to 0% to 10%. 5. The dose and duration of HBIG therapy needed when used in combination with lamivudine may be lower, but the optimal regimen remains to be determined. 6. Lamivudine resistance before LT is associated with an increased risk for recurrent hepatitis B post-LT. 7. A cost-effective prophylactic regimen to prevent recurrent hepatitis B should be tailored according to risk.

Effect of lamivudine treatment on survival of 309 North American patients awaiting liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B

The primary aim of this study is to determine whether treatment with lamivudine improved pre-liver transplantation (pre-LT) and LT-free survival of patients awaiting LT for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis. Data from 162 lamivudine-treated and 147 untreated transplant candidates managed at 20 North American transplant centers between 1996 and 1998 were collected and compared. Lamivudine-treated patients were more likely to be men, hepatitis B e antigen positive, HBV DNA positive, and have lower serum albumin levels at listing (P <.05). Actuarial pre-LT and LT-free survival were similar in lamivudine-treated and untreated patients. Using Cox regression analysis, the only significant predictor of pre-LT patient survival was the modified Child-Turcotte-Pugh (mCTP) score, whereas significant predictors of LT-free survival included ethnic background, lamivudine treatment, indication for LT, baseline serum alanine aminotransferase level, and baseline mCTP score. Lamivudine had no apparent effect on liver disease severity in patients undergoing LT, but appeared to improve disease severity in patients still awaiting LT. Breakthrough infection was noted in 11% of lamivudine-treated patients. We conclude that lamivudine therapy is not associated with improved pre-LT or LT-free survival in LT candidates with chronic hepatitis B. However, a subset of patients with less advanced liver failure may derive clinical benefit from lamivudine therapy, thus delaying the need for LT. In the absence of prospective, randomized, controlled trials of lamivudine in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, careful selection of patients and optimal timing of treatment are needed to balance the risk versus benefit of lamivudine therapy in LT candidates.

A concise update on the status of liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: the challenges in 2002

Significant improvements in both patient and graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure have been made during the last decade. Recurrence of HBV infection has decreased, even in high-risk patients. Despite ongoing progress, challenges remain for the next millennium, including the determination of cost-effective dosing strategies, treatment of HBV infection in liver transplant recipients, and ramifications of the use of new antiviral agents, specifically, the appearance of resistant strains. This review summarizes the relevant history of OLT for chronic viral hepatitis B, details accepted preventive and therapeutic treatments, and discusses ongoing experimental trials. Emphasis also is placed on new approaches in transplantation as they impact on the care of HBV-infected patients.

Favorable outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation in a patient with subacute liver failure due to the emergence of a hepatitis B YMDD escape mutant virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis B infection in whom a YMDD escape hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutant has emerged under lamivudine treatment are generally denied liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

We report the case of a male patient who was started on prophylactic treatment with lamivudine in the context of recurrent episodes of HBV reactivation during high dose immunosuppressive therapy for relapsing severe pulmonary sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

Following the emergence of a YMDD escape mutant virus under lamivudine treatment, he developed subacute liver failure requiring liver transplantation. The patient was treated with a combination of intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) which was started perioperatively and also continued lamivudine after OLT. Twelve months after OLT, there was no evidence of HBV reinfection of the liver graft with the use of HBIG and lamivudine.

CONCLUSIONS

This observation suggests that emergence of the YMDD mutation is not a contra-indication to OLT, providing adequate immunoprophylaxis using HBIG and lamivudine combination therapy.

Hepatitis B and C in the liver transplant recipient: current understanding and treatment

1. Liver disease related to chronic viral hepatitis is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) worldwide. 2. The natural history of hepatitis B virus infection has been dramatically modified, and outcome has improved substantially in the last decade with the use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine. 3. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, defined by histological injury, is almost universal, and a subset of patients (20% to 30%) develops allograft cirrhosis by the fifth year post-OLT. 4. Unfortunately, antiviral therapy for hepatitis C post-OLT, even when initiated preemptively before the development of histological recurrence in the first few weeks post-OLT, has failed to alter the natural history of HCV disease recurrence. 5. HCV-related allograft cirrhosis is associated with a high rate of decompensation and mortality.

Therapeutic advances in the management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C

Until recently, interferon monotherapy has been the only available therapeutic option for patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Lamivudine has emerged as another effective first-line therapy for chronic hepatitis B as well as a beneficial treatment option for patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis. Viral resistance with long-term lamivudine therapy remains a major concern but new data continue to show benefits despite the development of YMDD mutations. Combination therapy with ribavirin and pegylated interferon-alpha has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The rate of sustained virological response can now be expected to be as high as nearly 50% for genotype 1 and 80% for non-1 genotypes of hepatitis C.

Lamivudine and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin for prophylaxis of hepatitis B reinfection after liver transplantation possible role of mutations in the YMDD motif prior to transplantation as a risk factor for reinfection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Reinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with an unfavourable clinical course. Lamivudine/hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) combination treatment reduces reinfection rates. However, it is unclear at what time point lamivudine should be started and which HBIG doses are sufficient.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients receiving combination treatment were studied. Lamivudine was started up to 16.5 months before OLT and continued thereafter. HBIG was started intraoperatively and continued according to anti-HBs-titers. Median follow-up after OLT was 20 months.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received lamivudine pretreatment for >2 (median 6) months due to initial HBV-DNA-positivity (median 749 pg/ml). After initial lamivudine response HBV-DNA increased in two of them to concentrations above 10 pg/ml prior to OLT. Both had developed mutations in the YMDD motif and suffered from HBV reinfection 13 and 75 days postoperatively. Individual HBIG consumption was highly variable (range 787-4,766 lU/month). Twenty-two percent of anti-HBs titers measured before HBIG administration were below 100 IU/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined reinfection prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG is effective in patients with controlled viral replication at the time of OLT. However, pretransplantation lamivudine resistance is a risk factor for reinfection. Low dose HBIG maintenance therapy individualized according to anti-HBs-titers appears to be tenable.