Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in patients with kidney disease

Post-Dialysis Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Patients Receiving Intermittent High-Flux Hemodialysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) are at increased risk of infection, which represents a leading cause of mortality in this population. The use of additional vascular access devices such as peripherally inserted central catheters to treat such infections should be minimized in patients with ESRD requiring IHD in order to mitigate complications such as infection and thrombosis and to maintain venous patency for hemodialysis access. Intravenous antimicrobial dosing following IHD has the advantages of avoiding additional access devices and providing convenience for patients and providers. Vancomycin, cefazolin, and aminoglycosides have historically been regarded as the primary intravenous antimicrobials administered with IHD given their relatively low cost, convenient dosing, and longevity of clinical use. Despite this, a growing body of literature is evaluating the use of an expanded list of antimicrobials that may be employed using post-dialysis dosing for patients requiring IHD; however, the available data are largely limited to pharmacokinetic studies and small cohorts of infected patients or uninfected subjects. Post-dialytic dosing of intravenous antimicrobials may be considered on a patient-by-patient basis after careful consideration of clinical, microbiological, and logistical factors that may influence the probability of treatment success. This document reviews and evaluates currently available information on the post-dialytic administration of an expanded list of intravenous antimicrobials in the setting of thrice-weekly, high-flux IHD.

Safety and efficacy of omadacycline for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment

BACKGROUND

Many antibiotics require dosage adjustments in patients with renal impairment. In Phase III studies, omadacycline was non-inferior to moxifloxacin and linezolid in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), respectively. This analysis evaluated efficacy and safety measures from three omadacycline studies by patient renal function.

METHODS

Patients were stratified as having normal renal function (creatinine clearance >89 mL/min), mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance 60-89 mL/min) or moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min); creatine clearance ≤30 mL/min (severe renal impairment) was an exclusion criterion. Efficacy endpoints were clinical success at the early clinical response (ECR) and post-treatment evaluation (PTE) time-points. Safety was evaluated as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory measures.

RESULTS

This subgroup analysis included 773 patients with CABP and 1339 patients with ABSSSI in intent-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT populations, respectively. Clinical success rates were high at ECR and PTE across the studies (CABP 75-90%; ABSSSI 74-95%), and broadly similar between treatments, irrespective of renal function. Rates of TEAEs in patients with ABSSSI ranged from 33% to 52%, and were similar across renal function groups. In patients with CABP, higher rates were observed in patients with moderate renal impairment (56-61%) compared with patients with normal renal function or mild renal impairment (35-49%). The most common TEAEs were nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical success was similar across renal function groups, indicating no notable difference in the efficacy of omadacycline in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Omadacycline and comparators displayed similar safety profiles. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRY

OPTIC (NCT02531438); OASIS-1 (NCT02378480); OASIS-2 (NCT02877927).

Should the Vancomycin Minimal Inhibitory Concentration be used as an Infant Critical Care Regular Criteria?

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is the first-line antibiotic used for the treatment of staphylococcal infections. Because of its narrow therapeutic window and the pharmacokinetics variability, vancomycin trough serum concentration should be monitored. However, due to the increased cases of staphylococcus' commensal species infections and the case of vancomycin resistance, the minimal inhibitory concentration should be considered on antimicrobial therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This article aimed to show the importance of the minimal inhibitory concentration to infants on vancomycin therapy as regular criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three infants in the use of vancomycin, hospitalized in the same maternity hospital, and that had at least one blood culture performed during the intensive-care-unit hospitalization were included in the study. Vancomycin serum concentrations were determined by particleenhanced- turbidimetric inhibition-immunoassay. The vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration data were interpreted by following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). The trough serum concentration range of 10 to 20 mg.L-1 was considered therapeutic.

RESULTS

All three patients had at least one infection by S. epidermidis, being one patient exhibit vancomycin- resistant S. epidermidis infection. All patients had stoppages in the vancomycin treatment, and the minimal inhibitory concentration was performed for only one patient.

CONCLUSION

The data obtained from these patients also showed the need to perform therapeutic monitoring by using minimal inhibitory concentration values, because, although the serum concentrations were within the reference range, they are insufficient to guarantee patient therapeutic success.

The gut microbiota and the brain-gut-kidney axis in hypertension and chronic kidney disease

Crosstalk between the gut microbiota and the host has attracted considerable attention owing to its involvement in diverse diseases. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly associated with hypertension and is characterized by immune dysregulation, metabolic disorder and sympathetic activation, which are all linked to gut dysbiosis and altered host-microbiota crosstalk. In this Review, we discuss the complex interplay between the brain, the gut, the microbiota and the kidney in CKD and hypertension and explain our brain-gut-kidney axis hypothesis for the pathogenesis of these diseases. Consideration of the role of the brain-gut-kidney axis in the maintenance of normal homeostasis and of dysregulation of this axis in CKD and hypertension could lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets. In addition, the discovery of unique microbial communities and their associated metabolites and the elucidation of brain-gut-kidney signalling are likely to fill fundamental knowledge gaps leading to innovative research, clinical trials and treatments for CKD and hypertension.

Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics

Antimicrobial pharmacology and its effect on prescribing is quite complex. Selecting an antibiotic that will optimally treat an infection while minimizing adverse effects and the development of resistance is only the first step, as one must also consider the patient's individual pharmacokinetic alterations and the pharmacodynamic properties of the drug when prescribing it as well. Patients with CKD may have alterations in their protein binding, volumes of distribution, kidney clearance, and nonrenal clearance that necessitates antibiotic dose adjustments to prevent the development of toxicity. Knowledge of a drug's pharmacodynamics, defined as the relationship between drug exposure and antibacterial efficacy, provides some guidance regarding the optimal way to make dose adjustments. Different pharmacodynamic goals, such as maximizing the time that free (unbound) drug concentrations spend above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for time dependent drugs (e.g., β-lactams) or maximizing the free peak-to-MIC ratio for concentration-dependent antibiotics (e.g., aminoglycosides), require different adjustment strategies; for instance, decreasing the dose while maintaining normal dosing frequency or giving normal (or even larger) doses less frequently, respectively. Patients receiving hemodialysis have other important prescribing considerations as well. The nephrologist or patient may prefer to receive antibiotics that can be administered intravenously toward the end of a dialysis session. Additionally, newer dialysis technologies and filters can increase drug removal more than originally reported. This review will discuss the place in therapy, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and other pharmacologic considerations encountered when prescribing commonly used antibiotics in patients with chronic kidney disease or ESKD.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Omadacycline in Subjects with Impaired Renal Function

Many antibiotics require dose adjustments in patients with renal impairment and/or in those undergoing hemodialysis. Omadacycline, the first aminomethylcycline antibiotic in late-stage clinical development, displays activity against a broad spectrum of bacterial pathogens, including drug-resistant strains. Data from completed phase 3 studies of omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) showed intravenous (i.v.) to once-daily oral omadacycline to be clinically effective and well tolerated. To determine if the dosing of omadacycline should be adjusted in patients with impaired renal function, a phase 1 study examining the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of i.v. omadacycline (100 mg) was conducted in subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on stable hemodialysis (n = 8) and in matched healthy subjects (n = 8). i.v. administration of omadacycline produced similar plasma concentration-time profiles in subjects with ESRD and healthy subjects. Further, in subjects with ESRD, similar values of the PK parameters were observed when omadacycline was administered i.v. after or before dialysis. The mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity in plasma was 10.30 μg · h/ml when omadacycline was administered to ESRD subjects after dialysis, 10.20 μg · h/ml when omadacycline was administered to ESRD subjects before dialysis, and 9.76 μg · h/ml when omadacycline was administered to healthy subjects. The mean maximum observed concentration of omadacycline in plasma in ESRD subjects was 1.88 μg/ml when it was administered after dialysis and 2.33 μg/ml when it was administered before dialysis, and in healthy subjects it was 1.92 μg/ml. The 100-mg i.v. dose of omadacycline was generally safe and well tolerated in both ESRD and healthy subjects. This study demonstrates that no dose adjustment is necessary for omadacycline in patients with impaired renal function or on days when patients are receiving hemodialysis.

[Hot rods in the ICU : What is the antibiotic mileage of your renal replacement therapy?]

We would neither be disappointed nor upset if the gas mileage on the sticker of a car didn't match our personal, real-life fuel consumption. Depending on our daily route to work, our style of accelerating and the number of passengers in our carpool, the gas mileage will vary. As soon as the falcon wing door of our car is closed and entrance to the ICU is granted, we tend to forget all of this, even though another hot rod is waiting there for us. Renal replacement therapy is like a car; it fulfills goals, such as the removal of uremic toxins and accumulated fluids, but it also "consumes" (removes) antibiotics. Unlike catecholamines, where we have the mean arterial pressure on our ICU dashboard, we do not have a gauge to measure antibiotic "consumption", i.e. elimination by renal replacement therapy. This manuscript describes the principles and basic knowledge to improve dosing of antibiotics in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. As in modern cars, we briefly touch on hybrid therapies combining renal replacement therapy with extracorporeal lung support or adsorbent technologies that remove cytokines or bacteria. Further, the importance of considering body size and body composition is addressed, especially for choosing the right initial dose of antibiotics. Lastly we point out the dire need to increase the availability of timely and affordable therapeutic drug monitoring on the most commonly used antiinfectives, ideally using point-of-care devices at the bedside.

Renal function in patients with diabetic foot infection; does antibiotherapy affect it?

Introduction: Antibiotic treatment (antibiotherapy) of diabetic foot ulcers has been proven to have toxic effect on renal function.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate renal function in patients with diabetic foot infection.

Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study was performed on 142 patients with diabetic foot ulcers hospitalized in Shahid Yahyanejad hospital of Babol during 2013. After referring to profile of the patients, they were assigned to participate in two groups: group A consisted of patients receiving antibiotics with a low risk renal toxicity and patients who received antibiotics with a higher risk of renal toxicity were placed in group B. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured and calculated based on serum concentration of creatinine and Cockcroft-Gault equation. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 with chi-square, t test and paired t tests.

Results: Group A consisted of 74 patients (52.1%) and 68 patients (47.9%) participated in group B. GFRs before and after antibiotherapy were 64.73±33.87 cc/min and 59.10±30.51 cc/min, respectively (P=0.004). In group B, GFR decreased significantly after antibiotherapy (P=0.002).

Conclusion: According to the present study, renal function decreased after antibiotherapy and in patients who received antibiotics with higher nephrotoxicity rate, the rate of this decline was higher.

Clinical Pharmacology Studies in Critically Ill Children

Developmental and physiological changes in children contribute to variation in drug disposition with age. Additionally, critically ill children suffer from various life-threatening conditions that can lead to pathophysiological alterations that further affect pharmacokinetics (PK). Some factors that can alter PK in this patient population include variability in tissue distribution caused by protein binding changes and fluid shifts, altered drug elimination due to organ dysfunction, and use of medical interventions that can affect drug disposition (e.g., extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy). Performing clinical studies in critically ill children is challenging because there is large inter-subject variability in the severity and time course of organ dysfunction; some critical illnesses are rare, which can affect subject enrollment; and critically ill children usually have multiple organ failure, necessitating careful selection of a study design. As a result, drug dosing in critically ill children is often based on extrapolations from adults or non-critically ill children. Dedicated clinical studies in critically ill children are urgently needed to identify optimal dosing of drugs in this vulnerable population. This review will summarize the effect of critical illness on pediatric PK, the challenges associated with performing studies in this vulnerable subpopulation, and the clinical PK studies performed to date for commonly used drugs.

We Give Aminoglycoside Antibiotics at the End of Hemodialysis

We often administer dialyzable medications after dialysis to ensure that adequate concentrations are maintained in the body until the next session. In the case of aminoglycosides, we may have the opportunity to dose more aggressively predialysis, and then use the clearance of the drug by dialysis to limit toxicities. Predialysis aminoglycoside dosing is intriguing, although studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of this approach are necessary before it can be used routinely.

Three-times-weekly, post-dialysis cefepime therapy in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In hemodialysis patients, post-dialysis treatment with intravenous antibiotics permits even severe infections to be managed on an outpatient basis. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of action in monotherapy. We report on the pharmacokinetics of cefepime in post-dialysis therapy.

METHODS

Since June 2012, twelve infections were treated with post-dialysis cefepime in 9 patients on high-flux hemodialysis. The initial post-dialysis dose of cefepime was approximately 15 mg/kg. The following doses were adapted according to the trough serum levels obtained before the subsequent dialysis in order to be above the EUCAST breakpoints for susceptible organisms and above the MIC90. Residual plasma concentrations were determined before (n = 30) and after (n = 17) dialysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean ± SD dose of cefepime was 920 ± 270 mg (14.5 ± 5.1 mg/kg), but it was significantly lower before the 48 h interval (775 ± 210 mg or 12.7 ± 4.5 mg/kg) compared to the 72 h interval (1125 ± 225 mg or 17.2 ± 4.9 mg/kg) (p < 0.05). The mean trough pre-dialysis concentrations were 10.7 ± 3.9 mg/l and 11.3 ± 5.6 mg/l at 48 and 72 h, respectively. These levels always largely exceeded the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints for all the targeted bacteria (>1 mg/l) with the exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (>8 mg/l). Cefepime concentrations were higher in anuric patients compared to those with preserved diuresis (15.6 ± 3.5 vs 9.25 ± 3.6 mg/l; p < 0.001) and decreased on average by 81 % during dialysis (from 10.5 ± 3.7 to 1.96 ± 1.2 mg/l; p < 0.001). The clinical outcome of all patients was good.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment with cefepime administered post-dialysis three-times-weekly was effective and well-tolerated in our patients. According to our data, in patients infected by highly susceptible pathogens a fixed dose of cefepime of 1 g before every 48-h interval and of 1.5 g before every 72-h interval should be recommended, without need of routine monitoring of the cefepime blood levels. In patients having an infection with less susceptibles pathogens as P. aeruginosa, and particularly in those among them exhibiting residual renal function, higher initial doses are necessary (1.5 g before a 48-h interval and 2.0 g before a 72-h interval) with adaption according to the subsequent pre-dialysis trough serum levels.

[Antibiotic dosing for renal function disorders and continuous renal replacement therapy]

For patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy, it is essential that the dosing of antibiotics is adequately adjusted in order to achieve an effective drug level above the minimum inhibition concentration but avoiding toxic side effects. In the selection of substances, preference should be given to antibiotics with a broad therapeutic spectrum, low incidence of side effects and, as far as possible, extrarenal elimination. Determination of serum levels should always be carried out, when this is possible. In any case, a sufficiently high loading dose should be included. An accurate as possible estimation of residual renal function and calculation of the mechanical clearance allows determination of the necessary maintenance dosage, which is acceptably accurate for clinical needs. Recent studies have shown that under modern continuous renal replacement therapy, the extent of elimination of antibiotics is regularly underestimated so that nowadays, the risk of antibiotic underdosing is higher than toxicity due to overdosing.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations of antimicrobial drug therapy in cancer patients with kidney dysfunction

Patients with cancer have a high inherent risk of infectious complications. In addition, the incidence of acute and chronic kidney dysfunction rises in this population. Anti-infective drugs often require dosing modifications based on an estimate of kidney function, usually the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, there is still no preferential GFR formula to be used, and in acute kidney injury there is always a considerable time delay between true kidney function and estimated GFR. In most cases, the anti-infective therapy should start with an immediate and high loading dose. Pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic principles must be applied for further dose adjustment. Anti-infective drugs with time-dependent action should be given with the target of high trough concentrations (e.g., beta lactam antibiotics, penems, vancomycin, antiviral drugs). Anti-infective drugs with concentration-dependent action should be given with the target of high peak concentrations (e.g., aminoglycosides, daptomycin, colistin, quinolones). Our group created a pharmacokinetic database, called NEPharm, hat serves as a reference to obtain reliable dosing regimens of anti-infective drugs in kidney dysfunction as well as renal replacement therapy. To avoid the risk of either too low or too infrequent peak concentrations, we prefer the eliminated fraction rule for dose adjustment calculations.

Suboptimal antimicrobial drug exposure in patients with renal impairment

BACKGROUND

Recommendations on drug dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment may vary between the references. It is often unknown which approach the dosing schemes were based on and what drug exposure is likely to be achieved.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a simple method to evaluate recommended dosing schemes for patients with renal impairment, to apply this method to selected antibacterial drugs in order to evaluate expected drug concentrations using dosing schemes recommended for patients with severe infections, and to evaluate the expected consequences.

SETTING

This was a theoretical study, which was based on data from published clinical trials.

METHODS

Clinically established dosing schemes for 46 antibacterial drugs, as recommended for patients with renal impairment in the Summary of Product Characteristics, were analysed using a newly developed graphical method. Consistency of the dosing schemes with two general dose adjustment rules, the proportional rule and the eliminated fraction rule, was determined and drug exposure was predicted.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Predicted drug exposure. Consistency of recommended dosing schemes with the general dose adjustment rules.

RESULTS

Only 30% of the recommended dosing schemes were associated with similar average concentrations as expected in patients with normal renal function (44 % were associated with higher and 26% with lower concentrations). The highest median exposure was found in beta-lactams (170%, range 58-443%, for creatinine clearance of <15 ml/min, and 155%, range 54-232%, for creatinine clearance of 15 to <30 ml/min), where the medians were significantly different from 100% (P < 0.02). Consistency with a dosing rule was found in 59% of the dosing schemes (proportional rule 46%, eliminated fraction rule 50%, both rules 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative low exposure was found for several drugs, including ceftazidime, cefotaxime, imipenem, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and teicoplanin, where dosing schemes should be reconsidered or used only in clinical situations where a lower than maximum exposure appears adequate. General application of the proportional rule for calculating drug dose adjustments would lead to lower than clinically established dose practice for 44% of drugs.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations on the erythropoietin effect and adverse events of darbepoetin

INTRODUCTION

In the TREAT and RED-HF trials, patients who received a high darbepoetin dose had an increased risk of adverse events. To find an explanation, the published literature was analyzed on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of darbepoetin.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the sigmoid Emax model, the concentration producing 50% of the maximum erythropoietin effect is reported as CE50 = 0.41 ng/ml and the Hill coefficient as H = 3.0 for darbepoetin. Accordingly, a pharmacodynamics-based threshold concentration can be estimated with CE05 = 0.153 ng/ml producing 5% of Emax and a ceiling concentration with CE95 = 1.098 ng/ml producing 95% of Emax, respectively.

EXPERT OPINION

Darbepoetin trough levels should not be less than the threshold concentration but peak levels above the ceiling concentration could be associated with an increased risk of adverse events. The time span associated with the concentration fluctuation between the ceiling and the threshold concentration is estimated with 236 h (= 2.84 times elimination half-life of 83 h) and shorter than the 336 h when dosing every other week. According to such time-dependent pharmacodynamics, a weekly dosing regimen might be more effective and associated with less adverse events than higher doses every other week in patients with suboptimal response to a normal darbepoetin dose.

Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in a pooled sample of patients receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis

While the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of daptomycin in hemodialysis (HD) patients have been evaluated previously by three groups, resultant dosing recommendations have varied. To address this clinical conundrum, this study combined concentration-time data from these PK evaluations and derived uniform dosing recommendations among patients on HD receiving daptomycin. A two-compartment model with separate HD and non-HD clearance terms was fit to the PK data from these studies by using BigNPAG. Embedded with PK parameters from the population PK analysis, 5,000-subject Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed to identify HD dosing schemes that provided efficacy (cumulative and daily area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] values) and toxicity (trough concentrations of ≥ 24.3 mg/liter) profiles comparable to those from simulations employing the daptomycin PK model derived from the Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia-infective endocarditis (SAB-IE) study. Separate HD dosing schemes were sought for the two weekly interdialytic periods (48 and 72 h). For the 48-h interdialytic period, intra- and post-HD dosing provided the most isometric cumulative and daily AUCs. For the 72-h interdialytic period, all HD dosing schemes provided noncumulative AUC values from 48 to 72 h (AUC(48-72)) that were <50% of the SAB-IE AUC(48-72) values. Increasing the parent dose by 50% intra- or post-HD provided comparable AUC(48-72) values, while maintaining acceptable trough concentration (C(min)) values. When efficacy and toxicity profiles were evaluated for each individual study, higher probabilities for C(min) reaching ≥ 24.3 mg/liter were observed in one of the three studies. Given the high probability of C(min) being ≥ 24.3 mg/liter in one of the three studies, more intensive creatine phosphokinase (CPK) monitoring may be warranted in HD patients receiving daptomycin.

[Pharmacotherapy in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease]

The number of patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide and exceeds 15% of the entire population in industrialized countries. Half of the patients aged 70 + years suffer from CKD. The most prevalent underlying diseases leading to CKD are diabetes and hypertension. CKD per se increases the risk of cardiovascular events, cancer, and infections; hence, adequate and intensified pharmacotherapy is of utmost importance in this patient population. About 60% of all regularly used drugs are excreted by the kidney. For those, dose adjustment is of utter importance to avoid untoward effects and serious complications. The first important step for dose adjustment is the accurate estimation of renal function, i.e., glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Renal function cannot be assessed by serum creatinine alone as it only rises after a substantial (> 50%) loss of glomerular function and depends on many factors, e.g., age, gender, weight, and race. GFR can easily be estimated using formulas, e.g., the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.

A clinical review of peritoneal dialysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the principles and practice of peritoneal dialysis in veterinary medicine.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical and experimental studies and current guideline recommendations from the human literature; and original case studies, case reports, and previous reviews in the veterinary literature.

SUMMARY

Peritoneal dialysis involves the exchange of solutes and fluid between the peritoneal capillary blood and the dialysis solution across the peritoneal membrane. It requires placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter for repeated dialysate exchange. The ideal catheter provides reliable, rapid dialysate flow rates without leaks or infections. Catheter selection and placement are reviewed along with dialysate selection, exchange prescriptions, and overall patient management. PD does not require specific or complex equipment, and it can achieve effective control of uremia and electrolyte imbalances.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal dialysis is a potential life-saving measure for patients with acute renal failure. Peritoneal dialysis results in gradual decline in uremic toxins. Previously low success rates have been reported. Improved success rates have been noted in dogs with acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to leptospirosis. Cats also have a good success rate when PD is elected in patients with a potentially reversible underlying disease. Overall, PD remains a viable intervention for patients with AKI unresponsive to medical management. In select patients a favorable outcome is attained whereby PD provides temporary support until return of effective renal function is attained.