A 1-year randomized trial of calcium acetate versus sevelamer on progression of coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients with comparable lipid control: the Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation-2 (CARE-2) study

Phosphorous metabolism and manipulation in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is a syndrome commonly observed in subjects with impaired renal function. Phosphate metabolism has been implicated in the pathogenesis of CKD-MBD and according to the phosphorocentric hypothesis may be the key player in the pathogenesis of these abnormalities. As phosphorous is an essential component for life, absorption from the bowel, accumulation and release from the bones, and elimination through the kidneys are all homeostatic mechanisms that maintain phosphate balance through very sophisticated feedback mechanisms, which comprise as main actors: vitamin D (VD), parathyroid hormone (PTH), calciproteins particles (CPPs), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and other phosphatonins and klotho. Indeed, as the renal function declines, factors such as FGF-23 and PTH prevent phosphate accumulation and hyperphosphatemia. However, these factors per se may be responsible for the organ damages associated with CKD-MBD, such as bone osteodystrophy and vascular calcification. We herein review the current understanding of the CKD-MBD focusing on phosphorous metabolism and the impact of phosphate manipulation on surrogate and hard outcomes.

Persistent uncertainties in optimal treatment approaches of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is a critical analysis of treatment results obtained in clinical trials conducted in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), hyperphosphatemia, or both.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with CKD have a high mortality rate. The disorder of mineral and bone metabolism (CKD-MBD), which is commonly present in these patients, is associated with adverse outcomes, including cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical trials aimed at improving these outcomes by modifying CKD-MBD associated factors have most often resulted in disappointing results. The complexity of CKD-MBD, where many players are closely interconnected, might explain these negative findings. We first present an historical perspective of current knowledge in the field of CKD-MBD and then examine potential flaws of past and ongoing clinical trials targeting SHPT and hyperphosphatemia respectively in patients with CKD.

Triglyceride-glucose index is an independent predictor of coronary artery calcification progression in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events and metabolic disturbances. The triglyceride-glucose index (TyGI), a novel surrogate marker of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, is associated with CAC in the general population and in patients with diabetes. This study investigated the association between the TyGI and CAC progression in patients with CKD, which is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 1,154 patients with CKD (grades 1-5; age, 52.8 ± 11.9 years; male, 688 [59.6%]) were enrolled from the KNOWCKD (KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease). The TyGI was calculated as follows: ln (fasting triglycerides × fasting glucose/2). Patients were classified into tertiles (low, intermediate, high) based on the TyGI. The primary outcome was annualized percentage change in CAC score [(percent change in CAC score + 1)12/follow-up months - 1] of ≥15%, defined as CAC progression.

RESULTS

During the 4-year follow-up, the percentage of patients with CAC progression increased across TyGI groups (28.6%, 37.5%, and 46.2% in low, intermediate, and high groups, respectively; p < 0.001). A high TyGI was associated with an increased risk of CAC progression (odds ratio [OR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-3.88; p = 0.02) compared to the low group. Moreover, a 1-point increase in the TyGI was related to increased risk of CAC progression (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06-1.76; p = 0.02) after adjustment.

CONCLUSION

A high TyGI may be a useful predictor of CAC progression in CKD.

Future treatment of vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the global leading causes of morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Vascular calcification (VC) is a major cause of CVD in this population and is the consequence of complex interactions between inhibitor and promoter factors leading to pathological deposition of calcium and phosphate in soft tissues. Different pathological landscapes are associated with the development of VC, such as endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, loss of mineralization inhibitors, release of calcifying extracellular vesicles (cEVs) and circulating calcifying cells.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we examined the literature and summarized the pathophysiology, biomarkers and focused on the treatments of VC.

EXPERT OPINION

Even though there is no consensus regarding specific treatment options, we provide the currently available treatment strategies that focus on phosphate balance, correction of vitamin D and vitamin K deficiencies, avoidance of both extremes of bone turnover, normalizing calcium levels and reduction of inflammatory response and the potential and promising therapeutic approaches liketargeting cellular mechanisms of calcification (e.g. SNF472, TNAP inhibitors).Creating novel scores to detect in advance VC and implementing targeted therapies is crucial to treat them and improve the future management of these patients.

Kidney function, bone-mineral metabolism markers, and calcification of coronary arteries, aorta, and cardiac valves in older adults

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The contribution of kidney dysfunction, especially at mild-to-moderate stages, and bone-mineral metabolism (BMM) markers to vascular calcification remains controversial or unclear. We comprehensively evaluated the association of kidney and BMM markers with coronary artery calcification (CAC) and extra-coronary calcification (ECC).

METHODS

In 1931 ARIC participants (age 73-95 years) without coronary heart disease at visit 7 (2018-19), we investigated the associations of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (with creatinine, cystatin C, and both) and five serum BMM markers (calcium, fibroblast growth factor 23, magnesium, parathyroid hormone, and phosphorus) with high CAC and ECC (sex-race specific ≥75th vs. <75th percentile Agatston score) or any vs. zero CAC and ECC using multivariable logistic regression. For eGFR and BMM markers, we took their weighted cumulative averages from visit 1 (1987-89) to visit 5 (2011-13).

RESULTS

Lower eGFR, regardless of equations used, was not robustly associated with high CAC or ECC. Among BMM markers, only higher phosphorus levels, even within the normal range, showed robust associations with high CAC (only when modeled continuously) and ECC, independently of kidney function (e.g., odds ratio 1.94 [95%CI 1.38-2.73] for high aortic valve calcification, in the highest vs. lowest quartile). Results were generally consistent when analyzing any CAC or ECC, although cystatin C-based eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 became significantly associated with mitral valve calcification (odds ratio 1.69 [1.10-2.60]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among kidney and BMM measures tested, only serum phosphorus demonstrated robust associations with both CAC and ECC, supporting a key role of phosphorus in the pathophysiology of vascular calcification.

Effect of lanthanum carbonate and calcium carbonate on the progression of coronary artery calcification among hemodialysis patients with vascular calcification risk: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is predictive of cardiovascular events. We assessed whether a non-calcium-based phosphate binder, lanthanum carbonate (LC), could delay CAC progression compared with a calcium-based phosphate binder, calcium carbonate (CC), in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

This was a subsidiary of the LANDMARK study, which is a multicenter, open-label, randomized control study comparing LC and CC for cardiovascular events among Japanese hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia who were at risk of vascular calcification. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive LC or CC. The changes in the total Agatston score of CAC 2 years from baseline were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the changes in the total Agatston score at 1 year from baseline and the changes in serum phosphate, corrected calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone concentrations.

RESULTS

Of 239 patients, 123 comprised the full analysis set. The median daily drug dose (mg) was 750 [interquartile range (IQR), 750‒1500] in the LC group and 3000 (IQR, 3000‒3000) in the CC group; it remained constant throughout the study period. There was no significant difference in the change in total Agatston score from baseline to 2 years between the LC and CC groups [368 (95% confidence interval, 57-680) in the LC group vs. 611 (105-1118) in the CC group; difference, 243 (- 352-838)].

CONCLUSIONS

LC-based treatment for hyperphosphatemia did not delay CAC for 2 years compared with CC-based treatment in hemodialysis patients with at least one risk factor for vascular calcification.

A Comparison Between the Effects of Calcium Acetate and Sevelamer Carbonate on Progression of Aortic Vascular Calcification in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 4 and 5

Background: Calcium-based and non-calcium-based phosphate binders are frequently used to treat hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of calcium acetate and sevelamer carbonate on the progression of aortic vascular calcification in patients with CKD stages 4 and 5. Methods: This was an open-label randomized prospective comparative study, in which the participants encompassed both male and female patients with ambulatory hyperphosphatemic CKD stages 4 and 5 aged above 18 years. One hundred fifty patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 were screened for Aortic vascular calcification using digital X-ray lumbar spine and multi-slice CT scan, of whom fifty patients with vascular calcification were selected and randomly assigned into two groups. The participants were then serially studied for the effects of phosphate binders on the progression of vascular calcification over one year. One group was prescribed calcium acetate, and the other group was prescribed sevelamer carbonate. Results: Fifty hyperphosphatemic CKD patients with a mean age of 57 years were randomly assigned into two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups; however, the patients assigned to the sevelamer group were older and higher aortic calcification index (ACI) (P = 0.035) and Kauppila scores (P = 0.04), and elevated serum calcium (P = 0.04), Ca X PO4 (P = 0.006), and vitamin D. In calcium acetate-treated patients, the mean ACI increased significantly during six months and one year; however, the increase was not significant in the sevelamer group. Serum cholesterol, serum triglycerides, serum iPTH level, and the inflammatory markers of atherosclerosis high sensitivity of C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (hs-CRP, IL-6) decreased significantly in the sevelamer group. Conclusions: The prevalence of vascular (abdominal aortic) calcification in pre-ESRD (CKD stage 4 and 5) patients was 75%. Abdominal aortic calcification increased significantly in calcium acetate-treated patients during six months and one year; however, the progression was not significant regarding sevelamer. Because of its pleiotropic properties, sevelamer is more effective and consistent in retarding the progression of vascular calcification than calcium acetate in patients with CKD stages 4 and 5.

Non calcium phosphate binders - Is there any evidence of benefit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low-level evidence and opinion-based clinical practice guidelines highlight the substantial uncertainty in the practice patterns of hyperphosphatemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This manuscript reviews the evidence for the choice of phosphate binders and its impact on clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed for patients on dialysis. Clinical practice guidelines recommend lowering phosphate levels toward normal range and restricting calcium-based binders in all CKD patients. There is substantial gap in the evidence underlying these recommendations with lack of any placebo-controlled, randomized trials showing survival benefits for any class of phosphate-binders. Despite the lack of evidence for specific phosphate target or if lowering phosphate improves survival, use of phosphate binders has remained central strategy in approach to hyperphosphatemia. Use of binders has added to the cost and contributed significant pill burden. Restriction of calcium-based binders to avoid positive calcium balance and consequent vascular calcification risk has a physiological rationale and weight of observational studies.

SUMMARY

There is currently no conclusive evidence that definitively guides the choice of any specific binders for management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD. Use of noncalcium-based binders has a theoretical advantage in restricting total calcium intake to decrease the risk of vascular calcification but no proven benefits for mortality.

Interventions to Attenuate Vascular Calcification Progression in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Background Vascular calcification is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Evidence-based interventions that may attenuate its progression in CKD remain uncertain.

Methods We conducted a systematic review of prospective clinical trials of interventions to attenuate vascular calcification in people with CKD, compare with placebo, another comparator, or standard of care. We included prospective clinical trials (randomized and nonrandomized) involving participants with stage 3-5D CKD or kidney transplant recipients; the outcome was vascular calcification measured using radiological methods. Quality of evidence was determined by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method.

Results There were 77 trials (63 randomized) involving 6898 participants eligible for inclusion (median sample size, 50; median duration, 12 months); 58 involved participants on dialysis, 15 involved individuals with nondialysis CKD, and 4 involved kidney transplant recipients. Risk of bias was moderate over all. Trials involving magnesium and sodium thiosulfate consistently showed attenuation of vascular calcification. Trials involving intestinal phosphate binders, alterations in dialysate calcium concentration, vitamin K therapy, calcimimetics, and antiresorptive agents had conflicting or inconclusive outcomes. Trials involving vitamin D therapy and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors did not demonstrate attenuation of vascular calcification. Mixed results were reported for single studies of exercise, vitamin E-coated or high-flux hemodialysis membranes, interdialytic sodium bicarbonate, SNF472, spironolactone, sotatercept, nicotinamide, and oral activated charcoal.

Conclusions Currently, there are insufficient or conflicting data regarding interventions evaluated in clinical trials for mitigation of vascular calcification in people with CKD. Therapy involving magnesium or sodium thiosulfate appears most promising, but evaluable studies were small and of short duration.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of potential pleiotropic effects of sevelamer in chronic kidney disease: Beyond phosphate control

Sevelamer, has been shown to have many pleiotropic actions on lipid panel, various inflammatory markers, and blood glucose levels in chronic kidney disease patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these pleiotropic effects of sevelamer to other phosphate binders used in chronic kidney disease patients. The relevant randomized controlled trials published from 1 January 2001 to 31 November 2019 on the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were identified. All the included studies were independently assessed for eligibility and risk of bias. The modified data extraction form of Cochrane was used. This review included 44 studies for qualitative analysis and 28 reports for quantitative analysis. A meta-analysis of three studies (n = 180) showed that glycated haemoglobin had significantly decreased in sevelamer-treated patients (MD: 0.5%; p = <.001). Compared with calcium-based phosphate binders, sevelamer showed a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein (MD: -19.43 mg/dL; p = <.001) and total cholesterol (MD: -19.98 mg/dL; p < .001). A significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (MD: 1.29 mg/dL; p = .05) was also prominent in sevelamer treated patients. However, we were not able to observe a significant change in other biochemical parameters such as TG, CRP, hs-CRP, FGF-23, IL-6 and albumin as, no statistically significant difference was observed.

Innate and adaptive immunity: the understudied driving force of heart valve disease

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), and its clinical manifestation that is calcific aortic valve stenosis, is the leading cause for valve disease within the developed world, with no current pharmacological treatment available to delay or halt its progression. Characterized by progressive fibrotic remodelling and subsequent pathogenic mineralization of the valve leaflets, valve disease affects 2.5% of the western population, thus highlighting the need for urgent intervention. Whilst the pathobiology of valve disease is complex, involving genetic factors, lipid infiltration, and oxidative damage, the immune system is now being accepted to play a crucial role in pathogenesis and disease continuation. No longer considered a passive degenerative disease, CAVD is understood to be an active inflammatory process, involving a multitude of pro-inflammatory mechanisms, with both the adaptive and the innate immune system underpinning these complex mechanisms. Within the valve, 15% of cells evolve from haemopoietic origin, and this number greatly expands following inflammation, as macrophages, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and innate immune cells infiltrate the valve, promoting further inflammation. Whether chronic immune infiltration or pathogenic clonal expansion of immune cells within the valve or a combination of the two is responsible for disease progression, it is clear that greater understanding of the immune systems role in valve disease is required to inform future treatment strategies for control of CAVD development.

Long-Term Effects of Sevelamer on Vascular Calcification, Arterial Stiffness, and Calcification Propensity in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis: The Randomized Pilot SERENE (Sevelamer on Vascular Calcification, Arterial Stiffness) Trial

Rationale & Objective

There is a concern regarding increased risk of vascular calcification with the use of calcium-based phosphorus binders. This study aimed to compare the effects of sevelamer used as a second-line, low-dose therapy with calcium-based phosphorus binders with those of sevelamer used as a first-line, high-dose therapy on coronary artery and heart valve calcification, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), and calcification propensity over 2 years in patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Study Design

A 2-year-long prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized pilot study.

Setting & Participants

Prevalent patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving PD from 2 university-affiliated hospitals in Hong Kong.

Interventions

The patients were randomized to receive sevelamer either as a first-line therapy at a high dose of 800 mg thrice daily (can titrate up to 1,200 mg thrice daily as required) or a second-line therapy at a low dose of 400 mg thrice daily with calcium carbonate to achieve a serum phosphorus target of ≤5.5 mg/dL.

Outcomes

The primary endpoints were changes in coronary artery calcium score and aortic PWV over 104 weeks. The secondary endpoints were changes in heart valve calcium scores, calcification propensity measure, and biochemical parameters of chronic kidney disease–mineral bone disease over 104 weeks.

Results

Among 60 prevalent patients receiving PD, with a mean age of 53 ± 10 years and with 57% men, changes in the coronary artery calcium score (median [interquartile range], 225 [79-525] vs 223 [56-1,212], respectively; P = 0.21), aortic PWV (mean ± standard error, 0.3 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.2 m/s, respectively; P = 0.31), heart valve calcium score, maturation or transformation time, serum calcium levels, and phosphorus levels over 104 weeks were similar for the second-line, low-dose and first-line, high-dose sevelamer groups. Alkaline phosphatase and intact parathyroid hormone levels increased and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in both the groups, with no significant between-group differences.

Limitations

The sample size was small, and the dropout rates were relatively high.

Conclusions

Low-dose sevelamer used as a second-line therapy for hyperphosphatemia in combination with a calcium-based phosphorus binder had similar effects on vascular calcification, valvular calcification, and arterial stiffness compared with high-dose sevelamer used as a first-line therapy. This approach may be considered in resource-constrained countries to minimize calcium loading.

Funding

The study was supported by a competitive grant from SK Yee Medical Foundation. T50 assays and other biochemical assays were funded by a research grant from Sanofi Renal Corporation.

Trial Registration

NCT00745589.

Smoking Cessation and Coronary Artery Calcification in CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Smoking is associated with vascular calcification and a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. In this study, we investigated the association of smoking dose and cessation with coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with CKD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

From a nationwide, prospective cohort of Korean patients with CKD, 1914 participants were included. Prevalent CAC was defined as an Agatston score >0, using computed tomography. CAC progression was defined as ≥30%/yr increase in Agatston score at the 4-year follow-up examination in patients with baseline CAC.

RESULTS

Prevalent CAC was observed in 952 (50%) patients. Compared with never smokers, former smokers had a similar prevalence ratio for CAC, but current smokers had a 1.25-fold higher prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10 to 1.42). Among former smokers, a lower smoking load of <10 pack-years (prevalence ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.90) and longer duration of smoking cessation (prevalence ratio for 10 to <20 years, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98: prevalence ratio for ≥20 years, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.96) were associated with lower risk of prevalent CAC compared with current smoking. The prevalence ratios did not differ between never smoking and long-term cessation. However, short-term cessation with heavy smoking load was associated with a higher risk of prevalent CAC (prevalence ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.40) compared with never smoking. CAC progression was observed in 111 (33%) patients with baseline CAC. Compared with never smokers, former smokers showed a similar risk of CAC progression, but current smokers had a higher risk (relative risk, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.86).

CONCLUSIONS

In CKD, former smoking with a lower smoking load and long-term cessation were associated with a lower risk of prevalent CAC than current smoking. CAC progression was more pronounced in current smokers.

Old and New Drugs for the Management of Bone Disorders in CKD

Disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those undergoing dialysis. Renal osteodystrophy, which describes an alteration of bone morphology, is an important component of this systemic disorder and may explain the elevated risk of fracture which adversely affects morbidity and mortality. The most common form of renal osteodystrophy is high-turnover bone disease (osteitis fibrosa), which is induced by secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). During the past decade, there has been considerable advances in the management of SHPT, with the introduction of the calcimimetic agents, the optimized use of nutritional and active vitamin D, and the accumulated experience with surgical parathyroidectomy. Studies supported that these advances could translate into improvement of renal bone disease and fracture prevention, as well as decreasing the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. In this review, we summarize the available clinical evidence on the effect of old and new drugs on bone disorders in patients with CKD.

A randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of cinacalcet on bone and cardiovascular parameters in haemodialysis patients with advanced secondary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperparathyroidism may lead to increased cardiovascular risk. The use of cinacalcet may improve bone and cardiovascular health with improved parathormone (PTH) and phosphate control.

METHODS

This is an open-label prospective randomised controlled trial to compare progression of cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) parameters. Patients were randomised to receive cinacalcet alongside standard therapy or standard therapy alone. Thirty-six haemodialysis patients who had > 90 days on dialysis, iPTH > 300 pg/mL, calcium > 2.1 mmol/L and age 18-75 years were included. Following randomization, all 36 patients underwent an intensive 12-week period of bone disease management aiming for iPTH 150-300 pg/mL. The primary outcome was change in vascular calcification using CT agatston score. Secondary outcomes included pulse wave velocity (PWV), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), augmentation index (Aix) and bone measurements. The above measurements were obtained at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of a group difference in the progression of calcification (median change (IQR) cinacalcet: 488 (0 to1539); standard therapy: 563 (50 to 1214)). In a post hoc analysis combining groups there was a mean (SD) phosphate reduction of 0.3 mmol/L (0.7) and median (IQR) iPTH reduction of 380 pg/mL (- 754, 120). Regression of LVMI and CIMT was seen (P = 0.03 and P = 0.001) and was significantly associated with change of phosphate on multi-factorial analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

With a policy of intense CKD-MBD parameter control, no significant benefit in bone and cardiovascular markers was seen with the addition of cinacalcet to standard therapy over one year. Tight control of hyperphosphataemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism may lead to a reduction in LVMI and CIMT but this needs further investigation. Although the sample size was small, meticulous trial supervision resulted in very few protocol deviations with therapy.

Osteoporosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Systemic Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with the development of mineral bone disorder (MBD), osteoporosis, and fragility fractures. Among CKD patients, adynamic bone disease or low bone turnover is the most common type of renal osteodystrophy. The consequences of CKD-MBD include increased fracture risk, greater morbidity, and mortality. Thus, the goal is to prevent the occurrences of fractures by means of alleviating CKD-induced MBD and treating subsequent osteoporosis. Changes in mineral and humoral metabolism as well as bone structure develop early in the course of CKD. CKD-MBD includes abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, and/or vitamin D; abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth, or strength; and/or vascular or other soft tissue calcification. In patients with CKD-MBD, using either DXA or FRAX to screen fracture risk should be considered. Biomarkers such as bALP and iPTH may assist to assess bone turnover. Before initiating an antiresorptive or anabolic agent to treat osteoporosis in CKD patients, lifestyle modifications, such as exercise, calcium, and vitamin D supplementation, smoking cessation, and avoidance of excessive alcohol intake are important. Managing hyperphosphatemia and SHPT are also crucial. Understanding the complex pathogenesis of CKD-MBD is crucial in improving one's short- and long-term outcomes. Treatment strategies for CKD-associated osteoporosis should be patient-centered to determine the type of renal osteodystrophy. This review focuses on the mechanism, evaluation and management of patients with CKD-MBD. However, further studies are needed to explore more details regarding the underlying pathophysiology and to assess the safety and efficacy of agents for treating CKD-MBD.

Effects of the dialysate calcium concentrations and mineral bone disease treatments on mortality in The French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry

BACKGROUND

In patients on hemodialysis (HD), the various chemical elements in the dialysate may influence survival rates. In particular, calcium modifies mineral and bone metabolism and the vascular calcification rate. We studied the influence of the dialysate calcium concentration and the treatments prescribed for mineral bone disease (MBD) on survival.

METHODS

All patients in REIN having initiated HD from 2010 to 2013 were classified according to their exposure to the different dialysate calcium concentrations in their dialysis unit. Data on the individual patients' treatments for MBD were extracted from the French national health database. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate mortality hazard ratios (HR) associated with time-dependent exposure to dialysate calcium concentrations and MBD therapies, adjusted for comorbidities, laboratory and technical data.

RESULTS

Dialysate calcium concentration of 1.5 mmol/L was used by 81% of the dialysis centers in 2010 and in 83% in 2014. Most centers were using several formulas in up to 78% for 3 formulas in 2010 to 86% in 2014. In full adjusted Cox survival analyses, the percentage of calcium >1.5 mmol/L and <1.5 mmol/l by center and the number of formula used per center were not associated with survival. Depending on the daily dose used, the MBD therapies were associated with survival improvement for calcium, native vitamin D, active vitamin D, sevelamer, lanthanum and cinacalcet in the second and third tertiles of dose.

CONCLUSION

No influence of the dialysate calcium concentration was evidenced on survival whereas all MBD therapies were associated with a survival improvement depending on the daily dose used.

Effect of Sevelamer on Calciprotein Particles in Hemodialysis Patients: The Sevelamer Versus Calcium to Reduce Fetuin-A-Containing Calciprotein Particles in Dialysis (SCaRF) Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

Calciprotein particles (CPPs) are potentially modifiable mediators of phosphate toxicity in patients with kidney disease. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate (CC) and the non–calcium-based phosphate binder sevelamer on CPP levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We hypothesized that treatment with sevelamer would achieve greater reductions in amorphous calcium phosphate–containing CPP (CPP-1) and hydroxyapatite-containing CPP (CPP-2) owing to reduced calcium loading and anti-inflammatory pleiotropic effects.

Methods

We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which 31 stable prevalent HD patients were allocated to receive either sevelamer hydrochloride (SH), sevelamer carbonate (SC), or CC for 24 weeks. Dual primary endpoints were the between groups differences in serum CPP-1 and CPP-2 levels at 24 weeks in SH + SC–treated versus CC-treated patients. Effects on aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV), inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 and -8), and effects across individual treatment arms were also assessed.

Results

Serum CPP-1, but not CPP-2, levels were lower in those randomly assigned to the sevelamer (SH + SC) group compared with the CC group at 24 weeks (–70%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –90% to –15%, P = 0.02). In subgroup analysis, this effect was confined to those receiving SC (–83.4%, 95% CI –95.7% to –36.8%, P = 0.01). aPWV and interleukin-8 levels were also lower in those who received sevelamer compared with CC at 24 weeks (–2.0 m/s, 95% CI –2.9 to –1.1; –57%, 95% CI –73% to –30%, respectively, both P = 0.01). Conventional markers of mineral metabolism remained stable across all treatment groups.

Discussion

Compared with treatment with CC, use of sevelamer for 24 weeks was associated with lower serum CPP-1 levels and a reduction in aPWV and systemic inflammation.

Uremic Toxins and Vascular Dysfunction

Vascular dysfunction is an essential element found in many cardiovascular pathologies and in pathologies that have a cardiovascular impact such as chronic kidney disease (CKD). Alteration of vasomotricity is due to an imbalance between the production of relaxing and contracting factors. In addition to becoming a determining factor in pathophysiological alterations, vascular dysfunction constitutes the first step in the development of atherosclerosis plaques or vascular calcifications. In patients with CKD, alteration of vasomotricity tends to emerge as being a new, less conventional, risk factor. CKD is characterized by the accumulation of uremic toxins (UTs) such as phosphate, para-cresyl sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, and FGF23 and, consequently, the deleterious role of UTs on vascular dysfunction has been explored. This accumulation of UTs is associated with systemic alterations including inflammation, oxidative stress, and the decrease of nitric oxide production. The present review proposes to summarize our current knowledge of the mechanisms by which UTs induce vascular dysfunction.

Current Therapy in CKD Patients Can Affect Vitamin K Status

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have a higher risk of cardiovascular (CVD) morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. The links between CKD and CVD are not fully elucidated but encompass both traditional and uremic-related risk factors. The term CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) indicates a systemic disorder characterized by abnormal levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH and FGF-23, along with vitamin D deficiency, decreased bone mineral density or altered bone turnover and vascular calcification. A growing body of evidence shows that CKD patients can be affected by subclinical vitamin K deficiency; this has led to identifying such a condition as a potential therapeutic target given the specific role of Vitamin K in metabolism of several proteins involved in bone and vascular health. In other words, we can hypothesize that vitamin K deficiency is the common pathogenetic link between impaired bone mineralization and vascular calcification. However, some of the most common approaches to CKD, such as (1) low vitamin K intake due to nutritional restrictions, (2) warfarin treatment, (3) VDRA and calcimimetics, and (4) phosphate binders, may instead have the opposite effects on vitamin K metabolism and storage in CKD patients.

Controversies in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease that begins early in the course of renal insufficiency as an adaptive response to maintain mineral homeostasis. This complex disorder affects the bone, leading to an increase in fracture risk and is associated with increased risks of vascular calcification and mortality. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we examine the different strategies available to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism. Particularly, we focus on the adequate control of serum phosphorus by restricting intake and the use of phosphate binders, correction of hypocalcemia while minimizing calcium burden, and reduction in PTH levels through the use of vitamin D sterols and calcimimetics. RECENT FINDINGS: It was observed that although numerous agents directed at the correction of these abnormalities have demonstrated effectiveness on biochemical markers, there is still a relative scarcity of studies demonstrating treatment effectiveness as measured by hard clinical outcomes. In addition, most agents have side effects that may limit their use, even in patients in which the treatment has demonstrated efficacy in controlling these parameters. There is still controversy as to what therapeutic regimens to choose for a particular patient and what parameter should be used to follow their effects, including outcomes, side effects, pill burden, and costs, among others. In the present article, we analyze controversial aspects of the different therapeutic agents available. Although many tools and regimens are available, no one by itself is enough for an adequate management of the patient. But rather, combined therapy and individualization of approaches are recommended for better results. We suggest that new studies analyzing the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches to the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism should be directed not only to controlling parathyroid hormone levels but also to the evaluation of long-term outcomes, based on modification of morbidity, mortality, and end organ impact, while reducing side effects and controlling costs, among others.

Strategies for Phosphate Control in Patients With CKD

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in those requiring renal replacement therapy. The importance of controlling serum phosphate has long been recognized based on observational epidemiological studies that linked increased phosphate levels to adverse outcomes and higher mortality risk. Experimental data further supported the role of phosphate in the development of bone and cardiovascular diseases. Recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in phosphate homeostasis have made it clear that the serum phosphate concentration depends on a complex interplay among the kidneys, intestinal tract, and bone, and is tightly regulated by a complex endocrine system. Moreover, the source of dietary phosphate and the use of phosphate-based additives in industrialized foods are additional factors that are of particular importance in CKD. Not surprisingly, the management of hyperphosphatemia is difficult, and, despite a multifaceted approach, it remains unsuccessful in many patients. An additional issue is the fact that the supposedly beneficial effect of phosphate lowering on hard clinical outcomes in interventional trials is a matter of ongoing debate. In this review, we discuss currently available treatment approaches for controlling hyperphosphatemia, including dietary phosphate restriction, reduction of intestinal phosphate absorption, phosphate removal by dialysis, and management of renal osteodystrophy, with particular focus on practical challenges and limitations, and on potential benefits and harms.

A Randomized Trial of Magnesium Oxide and Oral Carbon Adsorbent for Coronary Artery Calcification in Predialysis CKD

BACKGROUND

Developing strategies for managing coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with CKD is an important clinical challenge. Experimental studies have demonstrated that magnesium inhibits vascular calcification, whereas the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate aggravates it.

METHODS

To assess the efficacy of magnesium oxide (MgO) and/or the oral carbon adsorbent AST-120 for slowing CAC progression in CKD, we conducted a 2-year, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, enrolling patients with stage 3-4 CKD with risk factors for CAC (diabetes mellitus, history of cardiovascular disease, high LDL cholesterol, or smoking). Using a two-by-two factorial design, we randomly assigned patients to an MgO group or a control group, and to an AST-120 group or a control group. The primary outcome was percentage change in CAC score.

RESULTS

We terminated the study prematurely after an interim analysis with the first 125 enrolled patients (of whom 96 completed the study) showed that the median change in CAC score was significantly smaller for MgO versus control (11.3% versus 39.5%). The proportion of patients with an annualized percentage change in CAC score of ≥15% was also significantly lower for MgO compared with control (23.9% versus 62.0%). However, MgO did not suppress the progression of thoracic aorta calcification. The MgO group's dropout rate was higher than that of the control group (27% versus 17%), primarily due to diarrhea. The percentage change in CAC score did not differ significantly between the AST-120 and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MgO, but not AST-120, appears to be effective in slowing CAC progression. Larger-scale trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Serum phosphate level at initiation of dialysis is associated with all-cause mortality: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Introduction: As glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreases, serum phosphate level increases. Previous reports indicated that serum phosphate level was associated with mortality in patients on dialysis. However, few reports have examined the association using dialysis initiation as the baseline period.

Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cohort analysis including 1492 patients. Patients were classified into four quartiles based on the serum phosphate level at dialysis initiation, with Q1 being the lowest and Q4 the highest. All-cause mortality after dialysis initiation was compared using the log-rank test. The propensity score represented the probability of being assigned to group Q1 or Q2–4. All-cause mortality was compared in propensity score-matched patients by using the log-rank test for Kaplan–Meier curves. All-cause mortality of Q1 was compared with that for Q2–4 using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. All-cause mortality was also determined among stratified groups with or without use of phosphate binders.

Results: Significant differences in cumulative survival rates were observed between the four groups (p < .001). After propensity score-matching, mortality was significantly higher in the Q1 group than the Q2-4 group (p = .046). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the Q1 group after adjustment for history of CAD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 − 1.00, p = .048). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups after adjustment for estimated GFR.

Conclusion: The serum phosphate level at the time of dialysis initiation was associated with all-cause mortality. However, the serum phosphate level was dependent on the renal function.

Phosphate binders for preventing and treating chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD)

BACKGROUND

Phosphate binders are used to reduce positive phosphate balance and to lower serum phosphate levels for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with the aim to prevent progression of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of phosphate binders for people with CKD with particular reference to relevant biochemical end-points, musculoskeletal and cardiovascular morbidity, hospitalisation, and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 July 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of adults with CKD of any GFR category comparing a phosphate binder to another phosphate binder, placebo or usual care to lower serum phosphate. Outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, adverse events, vascular calcification and bone fracture, and surrogates for such outcomes including serum phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and FGF23.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted study data. We applied the Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool and used the GRADE process to assess evidence certainty. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 104 studies involving 13,744 adults. Sixty-nine new studies were added to this 2018 update.Most placebo or usual care controlled studies were among participants with CKD G2 to G5 not requiring dialysis (15/25 studies involving 1467 participants) while most head to head studies involved participants with CKD G5D treated with dialysis (74/81 studies involving 10,364 participants). Overall, seven studies compared sevelamer with placebo or usual care (667 participants), seven compared lanthanum to placebo or usual care (515 participants), three compared iron to placebo or usual care (422 participants), and four compared calcium to placebo or usual care (278 participants). Thirty studies compared sevelamer to calcium (5424 participants), and fourteen studies compared lanthanum to calcium (1690 participants). No study compared iron-based binders to calcium. The remaining studies evaluated comparisons between sevelamer (hydrochloride or carbonate), sevelamer plus calcium, lanthanum, iron (ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, stabilised polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide), calcium (acetate, ketoglutarate, carbonate), bixalomer, colestilan, magnesium (carbonate), magnesium plus calcium, aluminium hydroxide, sucralfate, the inhibitor of phosphate absorption nicotinamide, placebo, or usual care without binder. In 82 studies, treatment was evaluated among adults with CKD G5D treated with haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, while in 22 studies, treatment was evaluated among participants with CKD G2 to G5. The duration of study follow-up ranged from 8 weeks to 36 months (median 3.7 months). The sample size ranged from 8 to 2103 participants (median 69). The mean age ranged between 42.6 and 68.9 years.Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were low risk in 25 and 15 studies, respectively. Twenty-seven studies reported low risk methods for blinding of participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. Thirty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias and 69 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias.In CKD G2 to G5, compared with placebo or usual care, sevelamer, lanthanum, iron and calcium-based phosphate binders had uncertain or inestimable effects on death (all causes), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. Sevelamer may lead to constipation (RR 6.92, CI 2.24 to 21.4; low certainty) and lanthanum (RR 2.98, CI 1.21 to 7.30, moderate certainty) and iron-based binders (RR 2.66, CI 1.15 to 6.12, moderate certainty) probably increased constipation compared with placebo or usual care. Lanthanum may result in vomiting (RR 3.72, CI 1.36 to 10.18, low certainty). Iron-based binders probably result in diarrhoea (RR 2.81, CI 1.18 to 6.68, high certainty), while the risks of other adverse events for all binders were uncertain.In CKD G5D sevelamer may lead to lower death (all causes) (RR 0.53, CI 0.30 to 0.91, low certainty) and induce less hypercalcaemia (RR 0.30, CI 0.20 to 0.43, low certainty) when compared with calcium-based binders, and has uncertain or inestimable effects on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. The finding of lower death with sevelamer compared with calcium was present when the analysis was restricted to studies at low risk of bias (RR 0.50, CI 0.32 to 0.77). In absolute terms, sevelamer may lower risk of death (all causes) from 210 per 1000 to 105 per 1000 over a follow-up of up to 36 months, compared to calcium-based binders. Compared with calcium-based binders, lanthanum had uncertain effects with respect to all-cause or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification and probably had reduced risks of treatment-related hypercalcaemia (RR 0.16, CI 0.06 to 0.43, low certainty). There were no head-to-head studies of iron-based binders compared with calcium. The paucity of placebo-controlled studies in CKD G5D has led to uncertainty about the effects of phosphate binders on patient-important outcomes compared with placebo.It is uncertain whether the effects of binders on clinically-relevant outcomes were different for patients who were and were not treated with dialysis in subgroup analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In studies of adults with CKD G5D treated with dialysis, sevelamer may lower death (all causes) compared to calcium-based binders and incur less treatment-related hypercalcaemia, while we found no clinically important benefits of any phosphate binder on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture or coronary artery calcification. The effects of binders on patient-important outcomes compared to placebo are uncertain. In patients with CKD G2 to G5, the effects of sevelamer, lanthanum, and iron-based phosphate binders on cardiovascular, vascular calcification, and bone outcomes compared to placebo or usual care, are also uncertain and they may incur constipation, while iron-based binders may lead to diarrhoea.

Rationale to reduce calcium intake in adult patients with chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Calcium is an essential ion for the maintenance of normal bone health and physiologic functions. The extracellular and intracellular levels of calcium are maintained through hormonal regulation called homeostasis. Balance, the net intake minus excretion of calcium, is maintained by hormonal regulation of intestinal absorption and fecal/urinary excretion. Homeostasis and balance are disconnected in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this review is to understand how calcium homeostasis and balance are impaired in CKD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two formal calcium balance studies have found that an oral intake of 800-1000 mg of calcium in adults with CKD leads to neutral calcium balance, whereas amounts greater than that lead to positive calcium balance. In patients with CKD, the main determinant of positive calcium balance is the intake and the lack of urinary calcium excretion.

SUMMARY

Calcium balance is different in patients with advanced CKD compared with patients without CKD. Thus, the oral intake of calcium in the form of diet and binders should not exceed 800-1000 mg/day to achieve neutral calcium balance in adult patients with CKD stages 3b/4.

Calcification of the heart: mechanisms and therapeutic avenues

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is reflective of atherosclerotic disease and incrementally predictive of future cardiovascular events (CVE), independent of traditional risk factors. Extra coronary calcium such as aortic valve calcification, which can be identified and quantified by computed tomography (CT) imaging, has shown to predict future CVE in both asymptomatic and symptomatic (i.e. stable angina and acute coronary syndrome [ACS]) settings. It has hence been a vital tool in studies involving new therapies for cardiovascular disease. Areas covered: In this review, promising therapies on the horizon are reviewed, along with the role of cardiac CT and coronary calcification in these studies. A Medline search for peer-reviewed publications using keywords related to coronary calcium score, aortic valve calcium, and therapies targeting the same was carried out. Expert commentary: CT scanning provides a distinct means of detecting and quantifying coronary plaque as well as valvular calcification with excellent reproducibility. Based on voluminous data available, the absence of coronary calcium serves as a factor to de-risk patients for cardiovascular risk stratification and management algorithms. Newer therapies have shown to lower progression of coronary calcification, thus being beneficial in slowing progression of atherosclerotic disease. As British Epidemiologist Geoffrey Rose states, the best predictor of a life-threatening disease is the early manifestation of that disease. As CAC represents the early manifestation of atherosclerosis, it is the best-known stratifier of risk today, and its clinical use will continue to rise.

Current and potential treatment options for hyperphosphatemia

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is common in late stages of chronic kidney disease and is often associated with elevated parathormone levels, abnormal bone mineralization, extra-osseous calcification, and increased risk of cardiovascular events and death. Several classes of oral phosphate binders are available to help control plasma phosphorus levels. Although effective at lowering serum phosphorus, they all have safety, tolerability, and compliance issues that need to be considered when selecting which one to use.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the most established treatment options for hyperphosphatemia, in patients with chronic kidney disease, focusing on the new inhibitors of active phosphate absorption.

EXPERT OPINION

The prevention and the treatment of hyperphosphatemia is today far to be satisfactory. Nonetheless, an extending range of phosphate binders are now available. Aluminum has potentially serious toxic risks. Calcium-based binders are very effective but can lead to hypercalcemia and/or positive calcium balance and progression of cardiovascular calcification. No long-term data are available for the new calcium acetate/magnesium combination product. Lanthanum is an effective phosphate binder, and long-term effects of tissue deposition seem clinically irrelevant. Sevelamer, appear to have profiles that would lead to pleiotropic effects and reduced progression of vascular calcification, and the main adverse events seen with these agents are gastrointestinal. Iron has a powerful capability of binding phosphate, thus numerous preparations are available, both with and without significant systemic absorption of the iron component. The inhibitors of active intestinal phosphate transport, with their very selective mechanism of action and low pill burden seem the most interesting approach; however, do not seem at present to be effective alone, in reducing serum phosphorus levels.

Current and potential therapeutic strategies for the management of vascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease including those on dialysis

Patients with CKD have accelerated vascular stiffening contributing significantly to excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Much of the arterial stiffening is thought to involve vascular calcification (VC), but the pathogenesis of this phenomenon is complex, resulting from a disruption of the balance between promoters and inhibitors of calcification in a uremic milieu, along with derangements in calcium and phosphate metabolic pathways. Management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors to reduce VC may be influential but has not been shown to significantly improve mortality. Control of mineral metabolism may potentially reduce the burden of VC, although using conventional approaches of restricting dietary phosphate, administering phosphate binders, and use of active vitamin D and calcimimetics, remains controversial because recommended biochemical targets are hard to achieve and clinical relevance hard to define. Increasing time on dialysis is perhaps another therapy with potential effectiveness in this area. Despite current treatments, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain high in this group. Novel therapies for addressing VC include magnesium and vitamin K supplementation, which are currently being investigated in large randomized control trials. Other therapeutic targets include crystallization inhibitors, ligand trap for activin receptors and BMP-7. This review summarizes current treatment strategies and therapeutic targets for the future management of VC in patients with CKD.

Prevention and treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease

Hyperphosphatemia has consistently been shown to be associated with dismal outcome in a wide variety of populations, particularly in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Compelling evidence from basic and animal studies elucidated a range of mechanisms by which phosphate may exert its pathological effects and motivated interventions to treat hyperphosphatemia. These interventions consisted of dietary modifications and phosphate binders. However, the beneficial effects of these treatment methods on hard clinical outcomes have not been convincingly demonstrated in prospective clinical trials. In addition, exposure to high amounts of dietary phosphate may exert untoward actions even in the absence of overt hyperphosphatemia. Based on this concept, it has been proposed that the same interventions used in CKD patients with normal phosphate concentrations be used in the presence of hyperphosphatemia to prevent rise of phosphate concentration and as an early intervention for cardiovascular risk. This review describes conceptual models of phosphate toxicity, summarizes the evidence base for treatment and prevention of hyperphosphatemia, and identifies important knowledge gaps in the field.

The Control of Hyperphosphatemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Which Phosphate Binder?

Hyperphosphatemia is currently regarded as a key mortality risk predictor in late CKD stages and especially in patients on dialysis. Fortunately, the armatorium to effectively treat hyperphosphatemia in end-stage renal disease has grown in recent years, and we gained an improved understanding of potential benefits and harms of specific compounds. Most interestingly, novel insights into the pathophysiology of calcium and phosphate handling, especially, the discovery of the phosphatonin FGF23, suggest a more complex assessment of phosphate balance especially in predialysis stages is warranted. This assessment should probably include measurements of fractional phosphate excretion and phosphatonin levels to objectively judge and effectively correct phosphate overload, however, clinical data on calcium and phosphate metabolism in CKD stages 3 – 4 are still scarce. This overview will both discuss aspects of pathophysiology of phosphate regulation and current and future clinical treatement approaches.

A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of PA21 versus sevelamer in dialysis patients

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PA21 versus sevelamer in dialysis patients.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial Registries for randomized controlled trials comparing PA21 and sevelamer in dialysis patients.

RESULTS

Four studies were included. Compared with sevelamer group, PA21 needed fewer mean daily number of tablets (WMD, - 7.97 pill; 95% CI, - 11.28 to - 4.65, p < 0.00001), developed fewer all adverse events (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.11, p = 0.05), and developed fewer gastrointestinal adverse events (RR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.53, p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in serum phosphorus between two groups (WMD, - 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, - 0.15 to 0.02, p = 0.12). As for serum calcium, there was also no significant difference between two groups (WMD, 0.27 mmol/L; 95% CI, - 0.63 to 1.17, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

PA21 can effectively control serum phosphorus with lower pill burden and less side effects than sevelamer. PA21 might be another valuable choice for dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia when patients are unable to tolerate sevelamer.

Pharmacotherapy in chronic kidney disease hyperphosphatemia – effects on vascular calcification and bone health

Hyperphosphatemia (HP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to complications such as renal osteodistrophy, cardiovascular calcification and hemodynamic abnormalities, all of them having a serious impact on the survival rate and quality of life. Also, HP is a key pathogenic factor in the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in CKD. Having in regard the significance of controlling serum phosphorus levels (Pi), in this paper, the needs and obstacles to successful pharmacological management of HP in CKD are presented, with an overview of major classes of phosphate binders (PBs) and other drugs affecting Pi level, such as active vitamin D sterols and calcimimetics (CMs). In addition, their effects on progression of cardiovascular calcification and bone health are elaborated. In this regard, a PubMed search was carried out to capture all abstracts and articles relevant to the topic of CKD, HP and mineral metabolism, bone disorders and vascular/valvular calcification (VC), published from January 2007 to August 2017. The search was limited to English language, with the search terms including drug name AND hyperphosphatemia or cardiovascular calcification or bone disorder. Comparative studies, clinical studies/trials and meta-analyses related to different classes/representatives of PBs, vitamin D analogues and CMs were reviewed and research data related to their efficacy and safety compared. Keywords: chronic kidney disease, hyperphosphatemia, phosphate binders, active vitamin D sterols, calcimimetics, bone disorders, cardiovascular calcification

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Phosphate Binders in Hyperphosphatemia Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

In this study, we coordinated a network meta-analysis to establish the efficacy and safety of different agents used in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia patients with chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

PubMed, CNKI, and Embase were systematically searched to retrieve relevant studies. Outcomes were presented by mean differences, odds ratios, and corresponding 95% credible intervals for continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. Each therapy was ranked according to the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Consistencies between direct and indirect comparisons were assessed with a node-splitting plot.

RESULTS

In terms of efficacy end points (including levels of serum phosphate, serum calcium, serum intact parathyroid hormone, and serum calcium × phosphorus product), all 7 kinds of agents outperformed or performed at least equally to placebo, with iron-based phosphate-binding agents being potentially the most effective. As for safety end points (including mortality, adverse events, and all-cause discontinuation), almost all agents were equivalent in term of mortality and all-cause discontinuation except in the comparison between iron-based phosphate-binding agents and placebo. Meanwhile, iron-based phosphate-binding agents colestilan and nicotinic acid performed poorly compared with placebo in terms of adverse events. Furthermore, iron-based phosphate-binding agents were potentially the safest agents followed sequentially by calcium-based phosphate-binding agents and placebo.

CONCLUSION

Iron-based phosphate-binding agents were the preferable agents when considering efficacy and safety simultaneously.

The efficacy and safety of sevelamer and lanthanum versus calcium-containing and iron-based binders in treating hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It remains unclear which phosphate binders should be preferred for hyperphosphatemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing sevelamer or lanthanum with other phosphate binders in CKD.

Results

Fifty-one trials (8829 patients) were reviewed. Compared with calcium-based binders, all-cause mortality was nonsignificantly lower with sevelamer {risk ratio [RR] 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-1.08]} and lanthanum [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.18-3.00)], but risk of bias was concerning. Compared with calcium-based binders, sevelamer reduced the risk of hypercalcemia [RR 0.27 (95% CI 0.17-0.42)], as did lanthanum [RR 0.12 (95% CI 0.05-0.32)]. Sevelamer reduced hospitalizations [RR 0.50 (95% CI 0.31-0.81)], but not lanthanum [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.34-1.93)]. The presence/absence of other clinically relevant outcomes was infrequently reported. Compared with calcium-based binders, sevelamer reduced serum calcium, low-density lipoprotein and coronary artery calcification, but increased intact parathyroid hormone. The clinical relevance of these changes is unknown since corresponding clinical outcomes were not reported. Lanthanum had less favorable impact on biochemical parameters. Sevelamer hydrochloride and sevelamer carbonate were similar in three studies. Sevelamer was similar to lanthanum (three studies) and iron-based binders (three studies).

Conclusion

Sevelamer was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in mortality and significantly lower hospitalization rates and hypercalcemia compared with calcium-based binders. However, differences in important outcomes, such as cardiac events, fractures, calciphylaxis, hyperchloremic acidosis and health-related quality of life remain understudied. Lanthanum and iron-based binders did not show superiority for any clinically relevant outcomes. Future studies that fail to measure clinically important outcomes (the reason why phosphate binders are prescribed in the first place) will be wasteful.

Effects of Sevelamer Hydrochloride on Uremic Toxins Serum Indoxyl Sulfate and P-Cresyl Sulfate in Hemodialysis Patients

Background

Beside the phosphate binding effect, non-calcium non-aluminum phosphate binder, namely sevelamer hydrochloride (SH), has many other effects in dialysis patients. It can absorb many other compounds, decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, and attenuate the progression of vascular calcification; it has been reported to have anti-inflammatory effect. However, it is not clear whether it has any effect on uremic toxins, i.e. serum indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate, (PCS) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study was carried out to appraise the effect of sevelamer on serum IS and PCS in HD patients.

Methods

Five adult HD patients from a single medical center were enrolled in this study; these patients were treated with 800 mg of sevelamer thrice per day for 3 months; a series of biochemical parameters, serum IS and PCS were monitored concurrently.

Results

There was a significant reduction in the mean level of phosphate from 7.20 ± 0.70 mg/dL (mean ± SD) before treatment to 5.40 ± 0.50 mg/dL (mean ± SD) after treatment, total cholesterol from 151.00 ± 37.40 mg/dL (mean ± SD) before treatment to 119.20 ± 29.40 mg/dL (mean ± SD) after treatment, and PCS from 31.30 ± 10.60 mg/L (mean ± SD) before treatment to 19.70 ± 10.50 mg/L (mean ± SD) after treatment. On the contrary, this treatment had no effect on IS.

Conclusion

A statistically significant reduction of serum phosphate and PCS in HD patients treated with SH suggests that beside the action of lowering serum phosphate, sevelamer may have an important role in the treatment of uremic syndrome by decreasing the uremic toxin.

Should nephrologists consider vascular calcification screening?

Vascular calcification (VC) has been widely discussed over the last few decades and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease. Importantly, these patients have premature and rapidly progressive calcification when compared with the general population. VC is an active and complex process that is closely regulated by a growing list of inducers and inhibitors. VC can be detected using several non-invasive modalities including plain radiography, echocardiogram and computed tomography scans. However, the usefulness of these imaging measurements to capture treatment effects may be limited. Routine screening and monitoring for progression of VC remains highly debatable.

Pharmacological Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is part of the CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD). SHPT is associated with increased risk of fracture and mortality; thus, SHPT control is recommended as kidney function declines. Effective SHPT management becomes more difficult once skeletal and cardiovascular adverse effects associated with severe SHPT have become established. However, interventional studies to lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) have so far shown inconsistent results in improving patient-centred outcomes such as mortality, cardiovascular events and fracture. Pharmacological treatment effect on PTH level is also inconsistent between pre-dialysis CKD and dialysis patients, which adds to the complexity of SHPT management. This review aims to give an overview on the pathophysiology, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for SHPT in CKD including some of the limitations of current therapeutic options.

Effects of different phosphate lowering strategies in patients with CKD on laboratory outcomes: A systematic review and NMA

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), a complication of chronic kidney disease, has been linked to reduced quality and length of life. High serum phosphate levels that result from CKD-MBD require phosphate-lowering agents, also known as phosphate binders. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the effects of available phosphate binders on laboratory outcomes in patients with CKD-MBD.

METHODS

Data sources included MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1996 to April 2016, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2016. Teams of two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened titles and abstracts and potentially eligible full text reports to determine eligibility, and subsequently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias in eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible trials enrolled patients with CKD-MBD and randomized them to receive calcium-based phosphate binders (delivered as calcium acetate, calcium citrate or calcium carbonate), non-calcium-based phosphate binders (NCBPB) (sevelamer hydrochloride, sevelamer carbonate, lanthanum carbonate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide and ferric citrate), phosphorus restricted diet (diet), placebo or no treatment and reported effects on serum levels of phosphate, calcium and parathyroid hormone. We performed Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) to calculate the effect estimates (mean differences) and 95% credible intervals for serum levels of phosphate, calcium and parathyroid hormone. We calculated direct, indirect and network meta-analysis estimates using random-effects models. We applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to rate the quality of evidence for each pairwise comparison.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 1108 citations; 71 RCTs were retrieved for full review and 16 proved eligible. Including an additional 13 studies from a previous review, 29 studies that enrolled 8335 participants proved eligible; 26 trials provided data for quantitative synthesis. Sevelamer, lanthanum, calcium, iron, diet and combinations of active treatments (calcium or sevelamer or lanthanum and combination of calcium and sevelamer) resulted in significantly lower serum phosphate as compared to placebo (moderate to very low quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant differences between active treatment categories in lowering serum phosphate. Sevelamer, lanthanum and diet resulted in lower serum calcium compared to calcium (moderate quality evidence for lanthanum and diet; low quality evidence for Sevelamer). Iron, sevelamer and calcium yielded lower parathyroid hormone levels as compared to lanthanum. Meta-regression analyses did not yield a statistically significant association between treatment effect and trial duration.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

We found few differences between treatments in impact on phosphate and differences in parathyroid hormone. Relative to calcium, sevelamer, lanthanum and diet showed significant reduction in serum calcium from baseline. Treatment recommendations should be based on impact on patient-important outcomes rather than on surrogate outcomes. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD-42016032945.

Elemental calcium intake associated with calcium acetate/calcium carbonate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia

Background

Calcium-based and non-calcium-based phosphate binders have similar efficacy in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia; however, calcium-based binders may be associated with hypercalcemia, vascular calcification, and adynamic bone disease.

Scope

A post hoc analysis was carried out of data from a 16-week, Phase IV study of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who switched to lanthanum carbonate monotherapy from baseline calcium acetate/calcium carbonate monotherapy. Of the intent-to-treat population (N=2520), 752 patients with recorded dose data for calcium acetate (n=551)/calcium carbonate (n=201) at baseline and lanthanum carbonate at week 16 were studied. Elemental calcium intake, serum phosphate, corrected serum calcium, and serum intact parathyroid hormone levels were analyzed.

Findings

Of the 551 patients with calcium acetate dose data, 271 (49.2%) had an elemental calcium intake of at least 1.5 g/day at baseline, and 142 (25.8%) had an intake of at least 2.0 g/day. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) serum phosphate levels were 6.1 (5.89, 6.21) mg/dL at baseline and 6.2 (6.04, 6.38) mg/dL at 16 weeks; mean (95% CI) corrected serum calcium levels were 9.3 (9.16, 9.44) mg/dL and 9.2 (9.06, 9.34) mg/dL, respectively. Of the 201 patients with calcium carbonate dose data, 117 (58.2%) had an elemental calcium intake of at least 1.5 g/day, and 76 (37.8%) had an intake of at least 2.0 g/day. Mean (95% CI) serum phosphate levels were 5.8 (5.52, 6.06) mg/dL at baseline and 5.8 (5.53, 6.05) mg/dL at week 16; mean (95% CI) corrected serum calcium levels were 9.7 (9.15, 10.25) mg/dL and 9.2 (9.06, 9.34) mg/dL, respectively.

Conclusion

Calcium acetate/calcium carbonate phosphate binders, taken to control serum phosphate levels, may result in high levels of elemental calcium intake. This may lead to complications related to calcium balance.

Targeting serum calcium in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: is normal too high?

Hypocalcemia is common in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and it is standard practice to correct this back to the normal range, presumably to prevent symptomatic hypocalcemia and help control hyperparathyroidism. However, there are few studies to support this approach, and recent data suggest that this promotes vascular calcification and adynamic bone disease. Whether setting a lower target will improve outcomes has not been tested, but existing data suggest that this may have minimal risks and substantial potential benefits and should be explored.

Phosphate Binders and Targets Over Decades: Do We have it Right Now?

In advanced renal disease, the kidney is unable to maintain phosphate balance due to decreased urinary excretion as well as the imbalance of the bone metabolic axis. It is well established that hyperphosphatemia is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there are no randomized controlled trials that demonstrate a clear benefit on hard outcomes in lowering serum phosphate levels to recommended targets in the CKD or dialysis population. In addition, while calcium-based phosphate binders have traditionally been the standard of care in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia, data regarding the increased risk of vascular mineralization continues to emerge. Clinicians continue to search for new phosphate-lowering therapies as well as investigate novel nutritional perspectives. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes is currently revising the guidelines on phosphate goals in CKD. This review will outline the history of phosphate targets and phosphate binders, and explore innovative phosphate-lowering therapies. Based on current data, clinicians moving forward should continue to treat end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia based on individual risk factors for vascular mineralization.