GFR estimation using standardized cystatin C in kidney transplant recipients

Prospective Comparison of Urinary Measured Creatinine Clearance With eGFR and Cystatin C Based Cis-eGFR, Including Kinetic eGFR in the Immediate Post-transplant Period With Prompt Allograft Function

BACKGROUND

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and kinetic estimated glomerular filtration rate (KeGFR) have not been compared, with urinary measured creatinine clearance (mCrCl) or serum cystatin C (CysC) eGFR, soon after kidney transplantation (KTx) with prompt primary function. This study aims to compare post-KTx, urinary mCrCl, and eGFR CysC with eGFR and KeGFR.

METHODS

Post-KTx, urine was collected every 12 hours from 25 of the 34 consenting subjects to calculate mCrCl and compare with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-4, Jelliffe eGFR, Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl), and KeGFR by Chen and Brater formulae. Serum CysC levels were also measured in the last 14 subjects to compare with creatinine, mCrCl, and eGFR CysC. RESULTS: At 12 to 96 hours post-KTx (n = 25), mCrCl was 55.8% to 13.6% higher than MDRD-4 eGFR. The mean CysC level (n = 14) was 58% to 14% lower than creatinine for up to 3.0 days post-KTx, with higher MDRD-4 eGFR CysC. Chen and Brater KeGFR were significantly lower than mCrCl and eGFR (Fig 1B, Table 1). Within 3 days post-KTx, a 50% decrease in creatinine provided ≥ 50 mL/min CrCl in 90% of cases (mean mCrCl 61.7 ± 22.8). This difference was greater when the initial creatinine was higher with the rapid decrease in creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Post-KTx eGFR/KeGFR formulae underestimated mCrCl. (2) Serum CysC levels were lower than creatinine, corresponding with higher eGFR CysC. (3) A 50% decrease from initial serum creatinine; mean mCrCl was 61.7 ± 22.8 mL/min, and 90% of them have mCrCl > 50 mL/min. Post-KTx, until creatinine is stabilized, recipients are often receiving subtherapeutic dosing of renally adjusted medications. More prospective studies are necessary, including radioisotope clearance.

Diagnostic standard: assessing glomerular filtration rate

Creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is imprecise at individual level, due to non-GFR-related serum creatinine determinants, including atypical muscle mass. Cystatin C has the advantage of being independent of muscle mass, a feature that led to the development of race- and sex-free equations. Yet, cystatin C-based equations do not perform better than creatinine-based equations for estimating GFR unless both variables are included together. The new race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation had slight opposite biases between Black and non-Black subjects in the USA, but has poorer performance than that the previous version in European populations. The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation developed in 2021 can be used in both children and adults, is more accurate in young and old adults, and is applicable to non-white European populations, by rescaling the Q factor, i.e. population median creatinine, in a potentially universal way. A sex- and race-free cystatin C-based EKFC, with the same mathematical design, has also be defined. New developments in the field of GFR estimation would be standardization of cystatin C assays, development of creatinine-based eGFR equations that incorporate muscle mass data, implementation of new endogenous biomarkers and the use of artificial intelligence. Standardization of different GFR measurement methods would also be a future challenge, as well as new technologies for measuring GFR. Future research is also needed into discrepancies between cystatin C and creatinine, which is associated with high risk of adverse events: we need to standardize the definition of discrepancy and understand its determinants.

Comparison of eGFR Equations to Guide Dosing of Medications for Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Clinicians caring for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) most commonly use estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to guide medication dosing as it is the most readily available measure of kidney function. Which eGFR equations provide the most accurate medication dosing guidance for KTRs remains uncertain.

METHODS

We studied 415 stable KTRs in Canada and New Zealand. Participants completed same-day measurements of creatinine and cystatin C and measured GFR (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid). Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, European Kidney Function Consortium, and transplant-specific eGFR equations were compared with both Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl) and measured GFR. eGFR equations were assessed both indexed to a standardized body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m2 (milliliter per minute per 1.73 m2, as is conventional reporting from most clinical laboratories) and nonindexed (milliliter per minute) accounting for actual BSA. The primary outcome was the proportion of medication dosing discordance relative to Cockcroft-Gault CrCl or measured GFR for 8 commonly prescribed medications. Stratified analyses were performed on the basis of obesity status.

RESULTS

Nonindexed eGFR equations (milliliter per minute) resulted in substantially lower medication dosing discordance compared with indexed eGFR equations (milliliter per minute per 1.73 m2). These findings were most pronounced among KTRs with obesity, in whom underdosing was frequent. When compared with Cockcroft-Gault CrCl, the lowest proportion of discordance was found with the nonindexed 2023 transplant-specific equation. When compared with measured GFR, the lowest proportion of discordance was found with the nonindexed 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology CollaborationCr/CysC equation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonindexed eGFR values accounting for actual BSA should be used by clinicians for medication dosing in KTRs. These findings may inform KT providers about which eGFR equations provide the safest, most accurate medication dosing guidance for KTRs.

The EKFC equation outperforms the CKD-EPI and CKiD equations for GFR estimation in adolescent and young adult kidney transplant patients

AIM

This study evaluated the bias and accuracy of the CKD-EPI/CKiD and EKFC equations compared with the reference exogenous tracer-based assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in adult and pediatric patients according to their renal transplant status.

METHODS

We assessed the bias and P30 accuracy of the CKD-EPI/CKiD and EKFC equations compared with iohexol-based GFR measurement.

RESULTS

In the overall population (n = 59), the median age was 29 years (IQR, 16.0-46.0) and the median measured GFR was 73.9 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 57.3-84.6). Among non-kidney transplant patients, the median was 77.7 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 59.3-86.5), while among kidney transplant patients, it was 60.5 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 54.2-66.8). The bias associated with the EKFC and CKD-EPI/CKiD equations was significantly higher among kidney transplant patients than among non-kidney transplant patients, with a difference between medians (Hodges-Lehmann) of +10.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI, 2.2-18.9; p = .02) for the EKFC and +12.1 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI, 4.2-21.4; p = .006) for the CKD-EPI/CKiD equations. In multivariable analysis, kidney transplant status emerged as an independent factor associated with a bias of >3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.4-43.3; p = .02) for the EKFC equation and a bias of >13.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (odds ratio, 15.0; 95% CI, 2.6-85.7; p = .002) for the CKD-EPI/CKiD equations.

CONCLUSION

In our study, which included adolescent and young adult kidney transplant patients, both the CKD-EPI/CKiD and EKFC equations tended to overestimate the measured glomerular filtration rate, with the EKFC equation exhibiting less bias. Renal transplant status significantly influenced the degree of estimation bias.

Challenges in the management of the kidney allograft: from decline to failure: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

In March 2022, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a virtual Controversies Conference to address the important but rarely examined phase during which the kidney transplant is failing or has failed. In addition to discussing the definition of a failing allograft, 4 broad areas were considered in the context of a declining functioning graft: prognosis and kidney failure trajectory; immunosuppression strategies; management of medical and psychological complications, and patient factors; and choice of kidney replacement therapy or supportive care following graft loss. Identifying and paying special attention to individuals with failing allografts was felt to be important in order to prepare patients psychologically, manage immunosuppression, address complications, prepare for dialysis and/or retransplantation, and transition to supportive care. Accurate prognostication tools, although not yet widely available, were embraced as necessary to define allograft survival trajectories and the likelihood of allograft failure. The decision of whether to withdraw or continue immunosuppression after allograft failure was deemed to be based most appropriately on risk-benefit analysis and likelihood of retransplantation within a few months. Psychological preparation and support was identified as a critical factor in patient adjustment to graft failure, as was early communication. Several models of care were noted that enabled a medically supportive transition back to dialysis or retransplantation. Emphasis was placed on the importance of dialysis-access readiness before initiation of dialysis, in order to avoid use of central venous catheters. The centrality of the patient to all management decisions and discussions was deemed to be paramount. Patient "activation," which can be defined as engaged agency, was seen as the most effective way to achieve success. Unresolved controversies, gaps in knowledge, and areas for research were also stressed in the conference deliberations.

GFR estimated with creatinine rather than cystatin C is more reflective of the true risk of adverse outcomes with low GFR in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Serum cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys) generally associates with clinical outcomes better than serum creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) despite similar precision in estimating measured GFR (mGFR). We sought to determine whether the risk of adverse outcomes with eGFRcr or eGFRcys was via GFR alone or also via non-GFR determinants among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients underwent a standardized GFR assessment during a routine follow-up clinic visit between 2011 and 2013. Patients were followed for graft failure or the composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) events or mortality through 2020. The risk of these events by baseline mGFR, eGFRcr and eGFRcys was assessed unadjusted, adjusted for mGFR and adjusted for CV risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 1135 recipients with a mean baseline mGFR of 55.6, eGFRcr of 54.8 and eGFRcys of 46.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a median follow-up of 6 years. Each 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease in mGFR, eGFRcr or eGFRcys associated with graft failure [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 1.68 and 2.07, respectively; P < .001 for all) and CV events or mortality outcome (HR 1.28, 1.19 and 1.43, respectively; P < .001 for all). After adjusting for mGFR, eGFRcys associated with graft failure (HR 1.57, P < .001) and CV events or mortality (HR 1.49, P < .001), but eGFRcr did not associate with either. After further adjusting for CV risk factors, risk of these outcomes with lower eGFRcys was attenuated.

CONCLUSION

eGFRcr better represents the true relationship between GFR and outcomes after kidney transplantation because it has less non-GFR residual association. Cystatin C is better interpreted as a nonspecific prognostic biomarker than is eGFR in the kidney transplant setting.

Comparison of the 2021 and 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Creatinine equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate in a Chinese population

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively compare the clinical effects of the newly released 2021 and 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate based on creatinine (eGFRcr) in a Chinese population with a broad spectrum of clinical characteristics using historical data.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients and healthy individuals who visited the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between July 1, 2020, and July 1, 2022, were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, amputees, pregnant women, patients with muscle-related diseases, and patients who had undergone ultrafiltration or dialysis. The final study population included 1,051,827 patients with a median age of 57 years; 57.24% of the enrolled individuals were men. eGFRcr was calculated using the 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI equations and initial creatinine level. Results were evaluated statistically by sex, age, creatinine level, and CKD stage.

RESULTS

The 2021 equation increased the eGFRcr in all participants compared to the 2009 equation by 4.46%. The median eGFRcr deviation of the 2021 CKD-EPI equation compared to the 2009 CKD-EPI equation was 4 ml/min/1.73 m². 903443 subjects (85.89%) had higher eGFRcr owing to the utilization of the 2021 CKD-EPI equation, which did not cause CKD stage change. A total of 11.57% of subjects (121,666) had improved CKD stage with the 2021 CKD-EPI equation. 1.79% (18,817) had the same CKD stage with both equations, and 0.75% (7,901) had lower eGFRcr but no change in the CKD stage with the 2021 equation.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 CKD-EPI equation typically produces higher eGFRcr results than the 2009 version. Applying the new equation could lead to changes in the CKD stage for some patients, which doctors should consider. .

The New 2021 CKD-EPI Equation Without Race in a European Cohort of Renal Transplanted Patients

BACKGROUND

Whether the new chronic kidney disease-epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation without the race variable remains accurate enough for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in non-US kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is unclear. We sought to compare the predictive performance between this equation and the classical CKD-EPI equation in a French cohort of KTRs. We also evaluated the performance of the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, an estimate that has proved very accurate in nontransplant patients and that does not include race variable.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 489 KTRs for whom GFR was measured by inulin clearance. Performances of GFR equations were compared according to median bias, imprecision, and accuracy within 30% (P30) and 20% (P20). Differences in P20/P30 were tested using the exact McNemar test.

RESULTS

Although the 4 equations exhibited a similar level of imprecision, the bias of the new CKD-EPI equation was +5.5 (4.0; 6.6) mL/min/1.73 m², much higher than the bias of the classical CKD-EPI, EKFC, and Modified Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) equation (2.4 [1.7;3.5], 2.2 [1.1;3.1], and -0.5 [-1.5; 1.0] mL/min/1.73 m², respectively). The new CKD-EPI equation was significantly less accurate with a P30 of 68.3% as compared with 74.2%, 75.3%, and 77.1% for the classical CKD-EPI, EKFC, and MDRD equation, respectively. The EKFC equation outperformed both versions of the CKD-EPI equation in terms of P20.

CONCLUSIONS

The new CKD-EPI equation is suboptimal for the care and follow-up of European transplanted patients. The EKFC equation shows at least a similar performance to the MDRD and the classical CKD-EPI equation. Further validation of the EKFC equation in KTRs from a diverse ethnic background is needed.

Performance of the 2021 Race-Free CKD-EPI Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Estimated GFR Equations Among Kidney Transplant Recipients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Race-free estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations incorporating creatinine with and without cystatin C were recently developed and recommended for routine use. However, the performance of these equations among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study to validate the 2021 race-free Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFR equation based on creatinine alone (eGFR_cr) or based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR_cr-cys) among KTRs.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

KTRs in stable condition (N = 415) from Canada and New Zealand with same-day measurements of creatinine, cystatin C, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.

TESTS COMPARED

The 2009 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr, 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr, 2012 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr-cys, 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr-cys, 2012 CKD-EPI eGFR_cys, and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study eGFR equations were compared with measured GFR.

OUTCOMES

Bias, precision, accuracy, and correct classification by CKD stage. Bias was defined as the difference between estimated and measured GFR. Precision was represented by the interquartile range. Accuracy was defined as the percentages of participants with eGFRs within 10%/20%/30% (P₁₀/P₂₀/P₃₀) of measured GFR, root mean square error, and mean absolute error.

RESULTS

87% of patients studied were White, 3% Black, and 10% other races. Mean measured GFR was 53 ± 19 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m². The 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr equations demonstrated similar median bias (-2.3 vs -0.2 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively), precision (14.5 vs 14.9 mL/min/1.73 m²), and accuracy (P₁₀/P₂₀/P₃₀, 32%/65%/84% vs 33%/63%/84%). The 2012 and 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr-cys equations also demonstrated similar median bias (-3.6 vs 0.3 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively), precision (13.3 vs 14.3 mL/min/1.73 m²), and accuracy (P₁₀/P₂₀/P₃₀, 32%/63%/80% vs 32%/67%/83%). No clear difference in performance was detected between the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr and eGFR_cr-cys equations among KTRs. The proportion of correct classification by CKD stage was similar across all eGFR equations.

LIMITATIONS

Moderate sample size, few patients had a GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m², and the large majority of patients were White.

CONCLUSIONS

Among KTRs, the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI eGFR equations perform similarly to the previous CKD-EPI equations that included race correction terms. No significant difference in performance was observed between the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR_cr and eGFR_cr-cys equations in the kidney transplant population.

Chronic kidney disease after lung transplantation in a changing era

Lung transplant (LTx) physicians are responsible for highly complex post-LTx care, including monitoring of kidney function and responding to kidney function loss. Better survival of the LTx population and changing patient characteristics, including older age and increased comorbidity, result in growing numbers of LTx patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD after LTx is correlated with worse survival, decreased quality of life and high costs. Challenges lie in different aspects of post-LTx renal care. First, serum creatinine form the basis for estimating renal function, under the assumption that patients have stable muscle mass. Low or changes in muscle mass is frequent in the LTx population and may lead to misclassification of CKD. Second, standardizing post-LTx monitoring of kidney function and renal care might contribute to slow down CKD progression. Third, new treatment options for CKD risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and heart failure, have entered clinical practice. These new treatments have not been studied in LTx yet but are of interest for future use. In this review we will address the difficult aspects of post-LTx renal care and evaluate new and promising future approaches to slow down CKD progression.

A comparison of four established GFR formulas to estimate measured GFR and changes in GFR in adult kidney transplant recipients

The accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients in order to identify graft dysfunction. A number of formulas have been proposed to calculate GFR from endogenous plasma markers such as creatinine or cystatin C since measuring GFR using exogenous markers is troublesome. This study compares and evaluates the ability of four different GFR formulas to estimate kidney graft function and to detect changes in GFR in kidney transplant recipients. The study included patients from the prospective, multicenter CONTEXT trial in kidney transplant recipients. GFR was measured using plasma clearance of ⁵¹Cr-EDTA and estimated using the MDRD, CKD-EPI Creatinine, CKD-EPI Cystatin C and CKD-EPI Cystatin C + Creatinine equations at three (n = 83) and twelve (n = 65) months post-transplantation. For each formula mean bias, precision, and accuracy were evaluated. The MDRD equation had the lowest mean bias (0.2 ml/min/1.73 m²), whereas the CKD-EPI Cystatin C + Creatinine equation had the highest precision (8 ml/min/1.73 m²). Accuracy at three months were similar for all equations (P30 > 80%) except for the CKD-EPI Cystatin C equation, which performed poorer (P30 = 55%). None of the formulas evaluated avoided misclassification of changes in GFR. The most optimal combination of precision and accuracy suggests the use of CKD-EPI Creatinine + Cystatin C equation in kidney transplant recipients.

Assessment of renal function using cystatin C and creatinine in Saudi patients after transplantation

Background:

Rapid and accurate assessment of kidney function in patients after transplantation is of utmost importance. The aim of this study was to compare the relationships of serum creatinine and serum cystatin C with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in kidney transplants Saudi patients after a certain period of transplantation.

Materials and Methods:

In this prospective study, 127 patients were categorized into three groups based on their length of survival after kidney transplantation; <1 year, from 1 to 5 years, and above 5 years after transplantation. Results of cystatin C and creatinine levels were compared by eGFR derived from estimation equation chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration.

Results:

In the three assessed periods, the mean (standard deviation) cystatin C level was 1.72 (0.57), 1.59 (0.64), and 1.82 (0.82), respectively, being highest after 5 years of transplantation, normal in 9.40%, and elevated in 90.60% of the participants, while creatinine level, decreased from 1.57 (0.53) to 1.52 (0.64) in 1–5 years, then it became the highest at 1.75 (0.69) in more than 5 years. The mean was normal in 21.30% and elevated in 78.70% of the patients. Both serum creatinine and cystatin C levels were negatively correlated with posttransplantation time in kidney transplant patients.

Conclusion:

The cystatin C level was statistically significantly higher after 5 years of transplantation. It is a better parameter to rule out renal dysfunction after transplantation.

20-year longitudinal follow-up of measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The slopes of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations are used in the longitudinal follow-up of transplant patients. A 30% reduction in eGFR over 2 years is often used to predict the subsequent risk of mortality or end-stage renal disease. Whether, at the individual level, such changes in eGFR correspond to changes in measured GFR (mGFR) is actually unknown.

METHODS

The performance of serum creatinine-based eGFR equations was compared with mGFR during the longitudinal follow-up of 20 years in a monocentric study of 417 transplanted patients.

RESULTS

The accuracy within 30% for the eGFR equations varied between 70 and 75%. All eGFR equations showed a similar pattern, very like the mGFR time profiles. Individual changes (slopes) of mGFR or eGFR were predictive of graft loss in the next months or years, following the decline in GFR, with no evidence for a difference. However, although the tendency is the same as for mGFR, the percentage of transplant patients with a >30% GFR decrease in the last period before graft loss is significantly lower for eGFR than for mGFR, with discordant results from mGFR in ~25% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

All eGFR equations showed similar trends as mGFR, but eGFR predictions may not be very useful at the individual patient level.

Comparison of bias and accuracy using cystatin C and creatinine in CKD-EPI equations for GFR estimation

BACKGROUND

The directly measured glomerular filtrate rate (mGFR) is the gold standard for kidney function, but it is invasive and costly. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations have been widely used to estimate GFR, however, the comparative accuracy of estimated GFR (eGFR) using creatinine and cystatin C in CKD-EPI equations remains unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the bias and accuracy of eGFR using equations of CKD-EPI_crea, CKD-EPI_cys, and CKD-EPI_crea/cys in adult populations relevant to primary health care.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until December 2019 for related studies.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies with 23,667 participants, which reported the data on the bias, and/or P30, and/or R were included. The difference in the bias of eGFR using CKD-EPI_cys was 4.84 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI, 1.88~7.80) lower than using CKD-EPI_crea, and 1.50 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI, 0.05~2.95) lower than using CKD-EPI_crea/cys. These gaps increased in subgroups of low mGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m²). CKD-EPI_crea/cys eGFR achieved the highest accuracy, 7.50% higher than CKD-EPI_crea (95% CI, 4.81~10.18), and 3.21% higher than CKD-EPI_cys (95% CI, -0.43~6.85); and the best correlation with mGFR, with Fisher's z transformed R of 1.20 (95% CI, 0.89-1.50).

CONCLUSIONS

CKD-EPI_crea/cys and CKD-EPI_cys gave less bias and more accurate estimates of mGFR than CKD-EPI_crea. More variables and coefficients could be added in CKD-EPI equations to achieve less bias and more accuracy in future research.

Association of sarcopenia with phase angle and body mass index in kidney transplant recipients

Malnutrition is an important risk factor for the development of sarcopenia. Recently, phase angle (PhA) obtained from the bioelectrical impedance analysis is increasingly becoming known as a nutritional status marker and may be considered a good indicator to identify elderly patients at risk of sarcopenia. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of sarcopenia and the relationship between sarcopenia and PhA or body mass index (BMI) as nutritional factors, and evaluated the discrimination performance of these nutritional factors for sarcopenia in 210 kidney transplant recipients. The median age was 55 years and 11.1% had sarcopenia. This prevalence of sarcopenia was lower than previous reports in kidney transplant recipients, maybe because of the differences in sarcopenia definitions and population demographics such as age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Both PhA and BMI were negatively correlated with sarcopenia after adjusting for age, sex, dialysis vintage, time after transplant, presence of diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the other nutritional factor. The discrimination performance for PhA and BMI had enough power to detect sarcopenia. These results suggest that PhA and BMI can be used in clinical practice to predict sarcopenia in kidney transplant patients.

Comparison of MDRD and the old CKD-EPI equations with the new CKD-EPI equations in kidney transplant patients when glomerular filtration rate is measured with 51Cr-EDTA

BACKGROUND

When estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in kidney transplant patients, significant differences have been found between MDRD and the 2009 CKD-EPI equations, and reference techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse and compare the performance of MDRD and the 2009 and 2012 CKD-EPI equations against ⁵¹Cr-EDTA plasma clearance in measuring GFR in 270 kidney transplant patients after one year.

RESULTS

The mean measured GFR was 43.0±11.4 (18.2-79.4)ml/min/1.73m², with creatinine levels of 1.42±0.46 (0.60-4.33)mg/dl and cystatin C levels of 1.45±0.53 (0.42-3.48)mg/l. This correlated moderately with creatinine (r=-0.61, P<.001) and cystatin C (r=-0.52, P<.001). Using linear regression techniques, it was found that creatinine, cystatin C, gender and age only explained 52% of GFR total variance. All equations overestimated GFR, with a mean bias of +11.1ml/min/1.73m² for MDRD, +16.4ml/min/1.73m² for 2009-CKD-EPI, +15ml/min/1.73m² for CKD-EPI with cystatin C, and +14.1ml/min/1.73m² for 2012-CKD-EPI with creatinine and cystatin C. eGFR by MDRD and the 2009 CKD-EPI equation correlated better with ⁵¹Cr-EDTA than CKD-EPI with creatinine and/or cystatin C. The overestimations were negatively correlated with creatinine and cystatin C levels, most significantly for CKD-EPI with creatinine and/or cystatin C when GFR was greater than 60ml/min/1.73m².

CONCLUSIONS

The 2012 CKD-EPI equations with creatinine and/or cystatin C significantly overestimate GFR in stage 1 and 2 chronic kidney disease. The MDRD equations is therefore recommended in these cases. The reference method used to measure GFR seems to heavily influence the bias of the equations.

Estimated GFR: time for a critical appraisal

Since 1957, over 70 equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C levels have been developed to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, whether these equations accurately reflect renal function is debated. In this Perspectives article, we discuss >70 studies that compared estimated GFR (eGFR) with measured GFR (mGFR), involving ~40,000 renal transplant recipients and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes mellitus or polycystic kidney disease. Their results show that eGFR often differed from mGFR by ±30% or more, that eGFR values incorrectly staged CKD in 30-60% of patients, and that eGFR and mGFR gave different rates of GFR decline. Errors were unpredictable, and comparable for equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C. We argue, therefore, that the persistence of these errors (despite intensive research) suggests that the problem lies with using creatinine and/or cystatin C as markers of renal function, rather than with the mathematical methods used for GFR estimation.

Evaluation of renal function in the Brazilian adult population, according to laboratory criteria from the National Health Survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the renal function of the Brazilian adult population, according to laboratory criteria of the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS).

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive study was carried out with laboratory data from the PNS, which was collected between the years 2014 and 2015. Population prevalence of the serum creatinine (CR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) according to sociodemographic variables, were analyzed from the PNS laboratory data.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 8,535 individuals aged 18 years old or older for the study of CR and 7,457 for the study of GFR. The GFR prevalence < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 6.7% (95%CI 6.0 - 7.4), higher in women (8.2% 95%CI 7.2 - 9.2) than in men (5.0% 95%CI 4.2 - 6.0) p < 0.001, and in elderly > 60 years old it was 21.4%. For the values of CR ≥ 1.3 mg/dL in men were 5.5% (95%CI 4.6 - 6.5), and in women values of CR ≥ 1.1 mg/dL were 4.6% (95%CI 4.0 - 5.4), with no diference between the genders, p = 0.140.

CONCLUSION

Results from the PNS laboratory identified a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the Brazilian population than that estimated in self-reported studies, with higher GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in women, and reaching one fifth of the elderly. These tests may be useful for the purpose of identifying the disease early on and thus preventing the progression of renal damage and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality.

Kidney graft survival of >25 years: a single center report including associated graft biopsy results

Only few centers have reported their observations on patients with very long-term kidney graft survival of more than 25 years. Eighty-six subjects were identified in our center with graft survival of >25 years. Donor age was 31.3 ± 18.5 years. Mean duration of transplantation was 30.3 ± 3.6 years. At last follow-up, the cystatin C clearance was 47 ± 23 ml/min. Transplant biopsies for cause were performed in 30 subjects at a median of 28.4 years (19.1-40.3) after transplantation. Acute or chronic active T cell-mediated rejection was present in five cases and histological characteristics of acute or chronic active humoral rejection in eight cases. More than 80% of biopsies had inflammatory infiltrates in nonatrophic or atrophic cortical areas. The number of HLA mismatches were higher in biopsied subjects (3.0 ± 1.8 vs. 2.2 ± 1.7 without biopsy). Immunosuppressive therapy was adapted in most biopsied subjects; impaired graft function and proteinuria was unchanged at last follow-up. Sixty percent of all subjects had hyperparathyroidism (iPTH of the whole group: 132 ± 157 pg/ml), which was predominantly secondary, as judged by serum calcium and graft function. Young donor age was certainly a prerequisite of longterm graft survival. Nonetheless, inflammation or rejection in most biopsied patients suggests an important role of alloreactivity even in this late course.

Impact of errors of creatinine and cystatin C equations in the selection of living kidney donors

Background

Reliable determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in the evaluation of living kidney donors. Although some guidelines recommend the use of measured GFR (mGFR), many centres still rely on estimated GFR (eGFR) obtained through equations or 24-h creatinine clearance. However, eGFR is neither accurate nor precise in reflecting real renal function. We analysed the impact of eGFR errors on evaluation and decision making regarding potential donors.

Methods

We evaluated 103 consecutive living donors who underwent mGFR via iohexol plasma clearance and eGFR by 51 creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations. The cut-off for living donation in our centre is GFR > 80 mL/min for donors >35 years of age or 90 mL/min for those <35 years of age. We analysed the misclassification of donors based on the cut-off for donation-based eGFR.

Results

Ninety-three subjects (90.3%) had mGFR values above (donors) and 10 [9.7% (95% confidence interval 5.4-17)] below (non-donors) the cut-off. In non-donors, most of the equations gave eGFR values above the cut-off, so donation would have been allowed based on eGFR. All non-donors were female with reduced weight, height and body surface. In donors, up to 32 cases showed eGFR below the cut-off, while mGFR was actually higher. Therefore an important number of donors would not have donated based on eGFR alone.

Conclusion

The misclassification of donors around the cut-off for donation is very common with eGFR, making eGFR unreliable for the evaluation of living kidney donors. Whenever possible, mGFR should be implemented in this setting.

Association of cystatin C- and creatinine-based eGFR with osteoporotic fracture in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: sarcopenia as risk for fracture

Coexistence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is regarded as a risk for osteoporotic fracture particularly in postmenopausal women, not only because of increased parathyroid hormone level but also uremic sarcopenia. We examined the relationships of cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys) and creatinine-based GFR (eGFRcr), as well as their ratio with occurrence of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. This cross-sectional study included 555 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. eGFRcr and eGFRcys were simultaneously measured, while occurrence of osteoporotic fracture was obtained by a medical chart review. Patients with osteoporotic fractures (n = 211) exhibited significantly lower levels of physical activity, eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratios, while a higher percentage was CKD stage 3 or more, estimated by eGFRcr or eGFRcys (CKDcys), than those without (n = 344). Lower eGFRcys, but not lower eGFRcr, was independently associated with osteoporotic fracture in the entire cohort and that association was retained in CKDcys patients. Of great interest, higher eGFRcr was associated with osteoporotic fracture independent of eGFRcys in CKDcys patients. Furthermore, lower eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio was independently associated with osteoporotic fracture in both CKDcys patients and the entire cohort. eGFRcys reduction might be associated with osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal osteoporotic women, indicating the involvement of renal osteopathy in its occurrence. Furthermore, the association of higher, but not lower, eGFRcr with osteoporotic fracture in CKDcys cases might be explained by underestimation of renal dysfunction by eGFRcr resulting from decreased muscle mass and quality in those patients.

Comparing different estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in assessing glomerular function in children based on creatinine and cystatin C

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best marker used to assess renal function. Estimated GFR (eGFR) equations have been developed, and the ideal formula is still under discussion. We wanted to find the most practical and reliable GFR in eGFR formulas. We compared serum creatinine (Scr)- and cystatin C (cysC)-based eGFR formulas in the literature. We also aimed to determine the suitability and the reliability of cysC for practical use in determining GFR in children.

METHODS

We have enrolled 238 children in the study. Measurement of 24-hour creatinine clearance was compared with eGFR equations which are based on Scr, cysC, and creatinine plus cysC.

RESULTS

Of the patients (n = 238), 117 were males (49.2%), and 121 (50.8%) were females with a median age of 9.0 years. The areas under the ROC curves of Counahan-Barratt and Bedside Schwartz were equal and 0.89 (with a 95% CI 0.80-0.97). The areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different in all cystatin C-based eGFR equations. The highest AUC values for differentiating normal vs abnormal renal functions according to CrCl₂₄ were for the CKiD-cysC and CKiD-Scr-cysC equations.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, compared with creatinine-based ones, the cystatin C-based formulas did not show much superiority in predicting eGFR. Still, we think Bedside Schwartz is a good formula to provide ease of use because, in this equation, the constant k is same for all age groups. However, the most valuable equations in determining chronic kidney disease are the CKiD-cysC and CKiD-Scr-cysC equations.

Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Comparing a Novel Equation With Commonly Used Equations in this Population

Background

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in kidney transplantation. The aim was to develop a kidney transplant specific equation for estimating GFR and evaluate against published equations commonly used for GFR estimation in these patients.

Methods

Adult kidney recipients (n = 594) were included, and blood samples were collected 10 weeks posttransplant. GFR was measured by ⁵¹Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance. Patients were randomized into a reference group (n = 297) to generate a new equation and a test group (n = 297) for comparing it with 7 alternative equations.

Results

Two thirds of the test group were males. The median (2.5-97.5 percentile) age was 52 (23-75) years, cystatin C, 1.63 (1.00-3.04) mg/L; creatinine, 117 (63-220) μmol/L; and measured GFR, 51 (29-78) mL/min per 1.73 m². We also performed external evaluation in 133 recipients without the use of trimethoprim, using iohexol clearance for measured GFR. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was the most accurate of the creatinine-equations. The new equation, estimated GFR (eGFR) = 991.15 × (1.120^sex/([age^0.097] × [cystatin C^0.306] × [creatinine^0.527]); where sex is denoted: 0, female; 1, male, demonstrating a better accuracy with a low bias as well as good precision compared with reference equations. Trimethoprim did not influence the performance of the new equation.

Conclusions

The new equation demonstrated superior accuracy, precision, and low bias. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was the most accurate of the creatinine-based equations.

Establishing the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease: Uses and limitations of formulas estimating the glomerular filtration rate

The development of formulas estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine and cystatin C and accounting for certain variables affecting the production rate of these biomarkers, including ethnicity, gender and age, has led to the current scheme of diagnosing and staging chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is based on eGFR values and albuminuria. This scheme has been applied extensively in various populations and has led to the current estimates of prevalence of CKD. In addition, this scheme is applied in clinical studies evaluating the risks of CKD and the efficacy of various interventions directed towards improving its course. Disagreements between creatinine-based and cystatin-based eGFR values and between eGFR values and measured GFR have been reported in various cohorts. These disagreements are the consequence of variations in the rate of production and in factors, other than GFR, affecting the rate of removal of creatinine and cystatin C. The disagreements create limitations for all eGFR formulas developed so far. The main limitations are low sensitivity in detecting early CKD in several subjects, e.g., those with hyperfiltration, and poor prediction of the course of CKD. Research efforts in CKD are currently directed towards identification of biomarkers that are better indices of GFR than the current biomarkers and, particularly, biomarkers of early renal tissue injury.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate by serum creatinine or/and cystatin C equations: An analysis of multi-centre Chinese subjects

AIM

Various equations based on serum creatinine or/and cystatin C, required further validation in a Chinese population. We compared the performance of six Chinese equations (Mascr, Peiscr, Macys, Fengcys, Mascr-cys and Fengscr-cys) with the CKD-EPI equations in multi-centre Chinese subjects and evaluated their applicability in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 1522 adult patients from four different hospitals of China were enrolled in the study. (99m) Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging was used as the reference GFR (rGFR), and serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured by standardized assays. An optimal score system was implemented in the study.

RESULTS

The average rGFR of recruited subjects was 67.30±28.89 mL/min per 1.73m(2) . All estimated GFR (eGFR) correlated well with rGFR. In accordance with Bland-Altman analysis, the Fengscr-cys equations achieved optimal overall performance (score 14 vs 0-6), with least bias (median difference, -0.57 mL/min per 1.73m(2) ; median absolute difference, 8.83 mL/min per 1.73m(2) ), best precision (17.99 mL/min per 1.73m(2) ), highest accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 15%, 30% and 50% of the rGFR (P15 , P30 and P50 ; 49.7%, 78.7% and 91.8%, respectively); root-mean-square-error (RMSE, 16.28)). The Fengcys equation, a typical cystatin C based equation, was another well-behaved formula with an impressive performance. The Ma equations performed much poorer than the CKD-EPI equations. Consistent results can be observed in the GFR- /age- and sex-specific subgroups, while none equation yielded ideal accuracy in GFR<60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The Fengscr-cys equation appeared to achieve the best performance for GFR estimation in overall Chinese adult patients. However, further research is warranted to improve the accuracy of available equations in GFR less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) individuals.

Creatinine-Based and Cystatin C-Based GFR Estimating Equations and Their Non-GFR Determinants in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

eGFR equations have been evaluated in kidney transplant recipients with variable performance. We assessed the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations on the basis of creatinine, cystatin C, and both (eGFR creatinine-cystatin C) compared with measured GFR by iothalamate clearance and evaluated their non-GFR determinants and associations across 15 cardiovascular risk factors.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A cross-sectional cohort of 1139 kidney transplant recipients >1 year after transplant was analyzed. eGFR bias, precision, and accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR) were assessed. Interaction of each cardiovascular risk factor with eGFR relative to measured GFR was determined.

RESULTS

Median measured GFR was 55.0 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). eGFR creatinine overestimated measured GFR by 3.1% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 80.4%), and eGFR Modification of Diet in Renal Disease underestimated measured GFR by 2.2% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 80.4%). eGFR cystatin C underestimated measured GFR by -13.7% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 77.1%), and eGFR creatinine-cystatin C underestimated measured GFR by -8.1% (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR of 86.5%). Lower measured GFR associated with older age, women, obesity, longer time after transplant, lower HDL, lower hemoglobin, lower albumin, higher triglycerides, higher proteinuria, and an elevated cardiac troponin T level but did not associate with diabetes, smoking, cardiovascular events, pretransplant dialysis, or hemoglobin A1c. These risk factor associations differed for five risk factors with eGFR creatinine, six risk factors for eGFR Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, ten risk factors for eGFR cystatin C, and four risk factors for eGFR creatinine-cystatin C.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, eGFR creatinine and eGFR creatinine-cystatin C are preferred over eGFR cystatin C in kidney transplant recipients because they are less biased, more accurate, and more consistently reflect the same risk factor associations seen with measured GFR.

Creatinine-based equations for the adjustment of drug dosage in an obese population

AIM

For drug dosing adaptation, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, after 'de-indexation' by body surface area (BSA). In pharmacology, the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation is still recommended to adapt drug dosage. In the context of obesity, adjusted ideal body weight (AIBW) is sometimes preferred to actual body weight (ABW) for the CG equation. The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of the different GFR-estimating equations, non-indexed or de-indexed by BSA for the purpose of drug-dosage adaptation in obese patients.

METHODS

We analysed data from patients with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 30 kg m(-2) who underwent a GFR measurement. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations, de-indexed by BSA, and the CG equation, using either ABW, AIBW or lean body weight (LBW) for the weight variable and compared with measured GFR, expressed in ml min(-1).

RESULTS

In our population of obese patients, use of the AIBW instead of the ABW in the CG equation, markedly improved the overall accuracy of this equation [57% for CGABW and 79% for CGAIBW (P < 0.05)]. For high BMI (over 40 kg m(-2)), the accuracy of the CG equations is no different when using LBW than when using AIBW. The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations de-indexed by the BSA also performed well, with an overall higher accuracy for the MDRD de-indexed equation [(80% and 76%, respectively (P < 0.05)].

CONCLUSIONS

The de-indexed MDRD equation appeared to be the most suitable for estimating the non-indexed GFR for the purpose of drug dosage adaptation in obese patients.

KDIGO Guidelines and Kidney Transplantation: Is the Cystatin-C Based Recommendation Relevant?

The KDIGO guidelines propose a new approach to diagnose chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In patients with a GFR value comprised between 45 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) as estimated by the CKD-EPI creatinine equation (eGFRcreat ), it is suggested to confirm the diagnosis with a second estimation using the CKD-EPI cystatin C-based equations (eGFRcys /eGFRcreat-cys) . We sought to determine whether this new diagnostic strategy might extend to kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and help to identify those with decreased GFR. In 670 KTR for whom a measured GFR was available, we simulated the detection of CKD using the two-steps approach recommended by the guidelines in comparison to the conventional approach relying on creatinine equation. One hundred forty-five patients with no albuminuria had eGFRcreat between 45 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . Among them, 23% had inulin clearance over 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and were thus incorrectly classified as CKD patients. When applying the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) strategy, 138 patients were confirmed as having a GFR below 60 mL/min with eGFRcreat-cys . However, 21% of them were misclassified in reference to measured GFR. Our data do no not support the use of cystatin C as a confirmatory test of stage 3 A CKD in KTR.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. The evaluation of graft function is mandatory in the management of renal transplant recipients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is generally considered the best index of graft function and also a predictor of graft and patient survival. However GFR measurement using inulin clearance, the gold standard for its measurement and exogenous markers such as radiolabeled isotopes ((51)Cr EDTA, (99m)Tc DTPA or (125)I Iothalamate) and non-radioactive contrast agents (Iothalamate or Iohexol), is laborious as well as expensive, being rarely used in clinical practice. Therefore, endogenous markers, such as serum creatinine or cystatin C, are used to estimate kidney function, and equations using these markers adjusted to other variables, mainly demographic, are an attempt to improve accuracy in estimation of GFR (eGFR). Nevertheless, there is some concern about the inability of the available eGFR equations to accurately identify changes in GFR, in kidney transplant recipients. This article will review and discuss the performance and limitations of these endogenous markers and their equations as estimators of GFR in the kidney transplant recipients, and their ability in predicting significant clinical outcomes.

Biomarkers in chronic kidney disease, from kidney function to kidney damage

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically evolves over many years, with a long latent period when the disease is clinically silent and therefore diagnosis, evaluation and treatment is based mainly on biomarkers that assess kidney function. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains the ideal marker of kidney function. Unfortunately measuring GFR is time consuming and therefore GFR is usually estimated from equations that take into account endogenous filtration markers like serum creatinine (SCr) and cystatin C (CysC). Other biomarkers such as albuminuria may precede kidney function decline and have demonstrated to have strong associations with disease progression and outcomes. New potential biomarkers have arisen with the promise of detecting kidney damage prior to the currently used markers. The aim of this review is to discuss the utility of the GFR estimating equations and biomarkers in CKD and the different clinical settings where these should be applied. The CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration equation performs better than the modification of diet in renal disease equation, especially at GFR above 60 mL/min per 1.73 m². Equations combining CysC and SCr perform better than the equations using either CysC or SCr alone and are recommended in situations where CKD needs to be confirmed. Combining creatinine, CysC and urine albumin to creatinine ratio improves risk stratification for kidney disease progression and mortality. Kidney injury molecule and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin are considered reasonable biomarkers in urine and plasma to determine severity and prognosis of CKD.

Chronic kidney disease screening methods and its implication for Malaysia: an in depth review

Chronic Kidney Disease has become a public health problem, imposing heath, social and human cost on societies worldwide. Chronic Kidney Disease remains asymptomatic till late stage when intervention cannot stop the progression of the disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need to detect the disease early. Despite the high prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in Malaysia, screening is still lacking behind. This review discusses the strengths and limitations of current screening methods for Chronic Kidney Disease from a Malaysian point of view. Diabetic Kidney Disease was chosen as focal point as Diabetes is the leading cause of Chronic Kidney Disease in Malaysia. Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease in Malaysia includes a urine test for albuminuria and a blood test for serum creatinine. Recent literature indicates that albuminuria is not always present in Diabetic Kidney Disease patients and serum creatinine is only raised after substantial kidney damage has occurred.  Recently, cystatin C was proposed as a potential marker for kidney disease but this has not been studied thoroughly in Malaysia.  Glomerular Filtration Rate is the best method for measuring kidney function and is widely estimated using the Modification of Diet for Renal Disease equation. Another equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Creatinine equation was introduced in 2009. The new equation retained the precision and accuracy of the Modification of Diet for Renal Disease equation at GFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2, showed less bias and improved precision at GFR>60ml/min/1.73m2. In Asian countries, adding an ethnic coefficient to the equation enhanced its performance. In Malaysia, a multi-ethnic Asian population, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation should be validated and the Glomerular Filtration Rate should be reported whenever serum creatinine is ordered. Reporting estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate will help diagnose patients who would have been otherwise missed if only albuminuria and serum creatinine are measured.

Comparing GFR Estimating Equations Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in Elderly Individuals

Current guidelines recommend reporting eGFR using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations unless other equations are more accurate, and recommend the combination of creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) as more accurate than either eGFRcr or eGFRcys alone. However, preferred equations and filtration markers in elderly individuals are debated. In 805 adults enrolled in the community-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study, we measured GFR (mGFR) using plasma clearance of iohexol, standardized creatinine and cystatin C, and eGFR using the CKD-EPI, Japanese, Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), and Caucasian and Asian pediatric and adult subjects (CAPA) equations. We evaluated equation performance using bias, precision, and two measures of accuracy. We first compared the Japanese, BIS, and CAPA equations with the CKD-EPI equations to determine the preferred equations, and then compared eGFRcr and eGFRcys with eGFRcr-cys using the preferred equations. Mean (SD) age was 80.3 (4.0) years. Median (25th, 75th) mGFR was 64 (52, 73) ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of decreased GFR was 39% (95% confidence interval, 35.8 to 42.5). Among 24 comparisons with the other equations, CKD-EPI equations performed better in 9, similar in 13, and worse in 2. Using the CKD-EPI equations, eGFRcr-cys performed better than eGFRcr in four metrics, better than eGFRcys in two metrics, and similar to eGFRcys in two metrics. In conclusion, neither the Japanese, BIS, nor CAPA equations were superior to the CKD-EPI equations in this cohort of community-dwelling elderly individuals. Using the CKD-EPI equations, eGFRcr-cys performed better than eGFRcr or eGFRcys.

Serum cystatin C is a determinant of central pressure augmentation index measured by oscillometric method in renal transplant recipients

Background

Serum cystatin C (ScysC) may help predicting cardiovascular outcome not only through its ability to detect renal dysfunction but also through its potential connection to others factors that are directly related to cardiovascular diseases. We explored the potential association of ScysC with arterial stiffness - a major contributor to cardiovascular disease - in renal transplant recipients (RTR).

Methods

Traditional and non-traditional cardio-vascular risk factors were collected from 215 stable RTR whom arterial stiffness was evaluated by the measure of the augmentation index of central pressure (AIx) determined by the arteriograph device. Serum creatinine and ScysC were measured the same day using standardized methods. Association between ScysC and AIx was examined in univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results

In univariate analysis, ScysC was strongly associated with AIx. This relationship was not confounded by age, gender, length of time spent on dialysis and transplantation vintage. Adjustment on the level of GFR estimated by the MDRD Study equation attenuated but did not abolish the association between ScysC and AIx.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ScysC is an independent predictor of AIx in RTR. Our data suggest that arterial stiffness may partially mediate the association between ScysC and cardiovascular risk in renal transplantation.

Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C versus Creatinine in a Uruguayan Population

Background. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from biomarkers has evolved and multiple equations are available to estimate renal function at bedside. Methods. In a random sample of 119 Uruguayans (54.5% women; 56.2 years (mean)), we used Bland and Altman's method and Cohen's kappa statistic to assess concordance on a continuous or categorical (eGFR < 60 versus ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) scale between eGFRcys (reference) and eGFR derived from serum creatinine according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFRmdrd) or the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations (eGFRepi) or from both serum cystatin C and creatinine (eGFRmix). Results. In all participants, eGFRmdrd, eGFRepi, and eGFRmix were, respectively, 9.7, 11.5, and 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher (P < 0.0001) than eGFRcys. The prevalence of eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was the highest for eGFRcys (21.8%), intermediate for eGFRmix (11.8%), and the lowest for eGFRmdrd (5.9%) and eGFRepi (3.4%). Using eGFRcys as reference, we found only fair agreement with the equations based on creatinine (Cohen's kappa statistic 0.15 to 0.23). Conclusion. Using different equations we reached clinically significant differences in the estimation of renal function. eGFRcys provides lower estimates, resulting in higher prevalence of eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

Improved glomerular filtration rate estimation using new equations combined with standardized cystatin C and creatinine in Chinese adult chronic kidney disease patients

OBJECTIVES

The newly developed glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-estimating equations developed by the CKD-EPI Collaboration and Feng et al. (2013) that are based on standardized serum cystatin C (ScysC), combined/not combined with serum creatinine (Scr), require further validation in China. We compared the performance of four new equations (CKD-EPIcys, CKD-EPIcr-cys, Fengcys, and Fengcr-cys equations) with the CKD-EPI creatinine equation (CKD-EPIcr) in adult Chinese chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to clarify their clinical application.

DESIGN AND METHODS

GFR was measured using the dual plasma sampling (99m)Tc-DTPA method (mGFR) in 252 adult CKD patients enrolled from four centres. Scr and ScysC were measured by standardized assays in a central laboratory. Each equation's performance was assessed using bias, precision, accuracy, agreement, and correct classification of the CKD stage.

RESULTS

The measured GFR was 46 [25-83] mL/min per 1.73 m(2). The CKD-EPIcys, CKD-EPIcr-cys and Fengcys equations provided significantly higher accuracy (P15: 38.9%, 39.7%, and 38.9%) than the CKD-EPIcr equation (29.8%). The CKD-EPIcr-cys and Fengcr-cys equations presented higher precision (IQR of the difference, 16.4 and 17.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively) and narrower acceptable limits in Bland-Altman analysis (56.6 and 50.8 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively) than single marker-based equations. The CKD-EPIcr-cys equation achieved the highest overall correct proportion (61.5%) in classification of CKD stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining ScysC and Scr measurements for GFR estimation improves diagnostic performance. The Scr-ScysC equation showed better performance than equations based on either marker alone. The CKD-EPIcr-cys equation showed the best performance for GFR estimation in Chinese adult CKD patients.

Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of kidney function is important for the management of solid-organ transplant recipients. In other clinical populations, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) most commonly is estimated using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine or the 4-variable MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study equation. The accuracy of these equations compared with other GFR estimating equations in transplant recipients has not been carefully studied.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic test study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Solid-organ transplant recipients longer than 6 months posttransplantation from 5 clinical populations (N=3,622, including recipients of kidney [53%], liver [35%], and other or multiple organs [12%]).

INDEX TEST

Estimated GFR (eGFR) using creatinine-based GFR estimating equations identified from a systematic review of the literature. Performance of the CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations was compared with alternative equations.

REFERENCE TEST

Measured GFR (mGFR) from urinary clearance of iothalamate or plasma clearance of iohexol.

MEASUREMENTS

Error (difference between mGFR and eGFR) expressed as P30 (proportion of absolute percent error <30%) and mean absolute error.

RESULTS

We identified 26 GFR estimating equations. Mean mGFR was 55.1±22.7 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m(2). P30 and mean absolute error for the CKD-EPI and the MDRD Study equations were 78.9% (99.6% CI, 76.9%-80.8%) for both and 10.6 (99.6% CI, 10.1-11.1) versus 11.0 (99.6% CI, 10.5-11.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; these equations were more accurate than any of the alternative equations (P <0.001 for all pairwise comparisons for both measures). They performed better than or as well as the alternative equations in most subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics, including type of transplanted organ.

LIMITATIONS

Study population included few nonwhites and people with solid-organ transplants other than liver and kidneys.

CONCLUSIONS

The CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations perform better than the alternative creatinine-based estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients. They can be used for clinical management.

Calibration and precision of serum creatinine and plasma cystatin C measurement: impact on the estimation of glomerular filtration rate

Serum creatinine (SCr) is the main variable for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Due to inter-assay differences, the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) varies according to the assay used, and calibration standardization is necessary. For SCr, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) is the gold standard. Systematic differences are observed between Jaffe and enzymatic methods. Manufacturers subtract 0.30 mg/dl from Jaffe results to match enzymatic results ('compensated Jaffe method'). The analytical performance of enzymatic methods is superior to that of Jaffe methods. In the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, SCr was measured by a Jaffe Beckman assay, which was later recalibrated. A limitation of this equation was an underestimation of GFR in the high range. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) consortium proposed an equation using calibrated and IDMS traceable SCr. The gain in performance was due to improving the bias whereas the precision was comparable. The CKD-EPI equation performs better at high GFR levels (GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Analytical limitations have led to the recommendation to give a grade (>60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) rather than an absolute value with the MDRD equation. By using both enzymatic and calibrated methods, this cutoff-grade could be increased to 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (with MDRD) and 120 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (with CKD-EPI). The superiority of the CKD-EPI equation over MDRD is analytical, but the precision gain is limited. IDMS traceable enzymatic methods have been used in the development of the Lund-Malmö (in CKD populations) and Berlin Initiative Study equations (in the elderly). The analytical errors for cystatin C are grossly comparable to issues found with SCr. Standardization is available since 2011. A reference method for cystatin C is still lacking. Equations based on standardized cystatin C or cystatin C and creatinine have been proposed. The better performance of these equations (especially the combined CKD-EPI equation) has been demonstrated.

Cystatin C enhances glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equation incorporating both cystatin C and creatinine perform better than those using creatinine or cystatin C alone in patients with reduced GFR. Whether this equation performs well in kidney transplant recipients cross-sectionally, and more importantly, over time has not been addressed.

METHODS

We analyzed four GFR estimating equations in participants of the Angiotensin II Blockade for Chronic Allograft Nephropathy Trial (NCT 00067990): Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations based on serum cystatin C and creatinine (eGFR (CKD-EPI-Creat+CysC)), cystatin C alone (eGFR (CKD-EPI-CysC)), creatinine alone (eGFR (CKD-EPI-Creat)) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation (eGFR (MDRD)). Iothalamate GFR served as a standard (mGFR).

RESULTS

mGFR, serum creatinine, and cystatin C shortly after transplant were 56.1 ± 17.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dl, and 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/l respectively. eGFR (CKD-EPI-Creat+CysC) was most precise (R(2) = 0.50) but slightly more biased than eGFR (MDRD); 9.0 ± 12.7 versus 6.4 ± 15.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. This improved precision was most evident in recipients with mGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). For relative accuracy, eGFR (MDRD) and eGFR (CKD-EPI-Creat+CysC) had the highest percentage of estimates falling within 30% of mGFR; 75.8 and 68.9%, respectively. Longitudinally, equations incorporating cystatin C most closely paralleled the change in mGFR.

CONCLUSION

eGFR (CKD-EPI-Creat+CysC) is more precise and reflects GFR change over time reasonably well. eGFR (MDRD) had superior performance in recipients with mGFR between 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2).

Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine

BACKGROUND

Detecting impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in intensive care units (ICU) in order to diagnose acute kidney injuries and adjust the dose of renally excreted drugs. Whether serum Cystatin C (SCysC) may better reflect glomerular filtration rate than serum creatinine (SCr) in the context of intensive care medicine is uncertain.

METHODS

We compared the performance of SCysC and SCr as biomarkers of GFR in 47 critically ill patients (median SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score of 5) for whom GFR was measured by a reference method (urinary clearance of iohexol).

RESULTS

Mean Iohexol clearance averaged 96 ± 54 mL/min and was under 60 mL/min in 28% of patients. Mean SCr and SCysC concentrations were 0.70 ± 0.33 mg/dL and 1.26 ± 0.61 mg/L, respectively. Area under the ROC curve for a GFR threshold of 60 mL/min was 0.799 and 0.942 for SCr and SCysC, respectively (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that ScysC significantly outperfoms SCr for the detection of an impaired GFR in critically ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: B7072006347.

Cystatin C and serum creatinine as predictors of kidney graft outcome

PURPOSE

Serum cystatin C (Cys C) was evaluated as a predictor of kidney graft failure progression, and its predictive ability was compared to other markers of graft function.

METHODS

The following kidney graft markers were determined in 91 patients who came for regular checkups of kidney graft function to our outpatient service in February 2008: Cys C, serum creatinine (sCr), 24-h proteinuria and 24-h urinary creatinine clearance (CCr). Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using sCr-based and Cys C formula. Patients were regularly monitored until February 2013 or to graft failure.

RESULTS

During follow-up, graft failure occurred in 21 recipients. The Cys C ≥2.65 mg/l discriminated patients with and without graft failure (sensitivity of 80.95% and specificity of 92.86%). According to c statistic, the highest performance was achieved for Cys C (0.874). In addition, Cys C area under the curve (AUC) was significantly better than CCr AUC (p = 0.007), 24-h proteinuria AUC (p = 0.03), eGFR estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (EPI) AUC (p = 0.05), but not better than sCr or eGFR AUCs calculated by other formulas. In the multivariable model, sCr, CCr, Cys C and eGFRs were predictors of graft failure. Combination of Cys C, sCr and logarithm of 24 h proteinuria (0.883) or Cys C, CCr and logarithm of 24-h proteinuria (0.884) had the highest AUC for predicting graft outcome that exceed insignificantly Cys C or sCr areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The most reliable predictors of graft outcome were Cys C, sCr and proteinuria. Because Cys C is unavailable in many transplant centers, from the practical point of view, sCr remains the most sensitive predictor of graft outcome.

Measurement of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease affects millions of people worldwide and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality as a result of kidney failure and cardiovascular disease. Accurate assessment of kidney function is important in the clinical setting as a screening tool and for monitoring disease progression and guiding prognosis. In clinical research, the development of new methods to measure kidney function accurately is important in the search for new therapeutic targets and the discovery of novel biomarkers to aid early identification of kidney injury. This review considers different methods for measuring kidney function and their contribution to the improvement of detection, monitoring and treatment of chronic kidney disease.

Update on cystatin C: incorporation into clinical practice

Kidney function monitoring using creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimation is a routine part of clinical practice. Emerging evidence has shown that cystatin C may improve classification of glomerular filtration rate for defining chronic kidney disease in certain clinical populations and assist in understanding the complications of chronic kidney disease. In this review and update, we summarize the overall literature on cystatin C, critically evaluate recent high-impact studies, highlight the role of cystatin C in recent kidney disease guidelines, and suggest a practical approach for clinicians to incorporate cystatin C into practice. We conclude by addressing frequently asked questions related to implementing cystatin C use in a clinical setting.

Creatinine-or cystatin C-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration in the general population: impact on the epidemiology of chronic kidney disease

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major issue in public health. Its prevalence has been calculated using estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the creatinine-based equations developed in the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) study. Recently, new equations based either on cystatin C (CKD-EPI Cys) or both cystatin and creatinine (CKD-EPI mix) have been proposed by the CKD-EPI consortium. The aim of this study was to measure the difference in the prevalence of stage 3 CKD, defined as an estimated GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m², in a population using these four equations.

Methods

CKD screening was performed in the Province of Liège, Belgium. On a voluntary basis, people aged over 50 years have been screened. GFR was estimated by the four equations. Stage 3 CKD was defined as a GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m².

Results

The population screened consisted of 4189 people (47% were men, mean age 63 ± 7y). Their mean serum creatinine and plasma cystatin C levels were 0.88 ± 0.21 mg/dL and 0.85 ± 0.17 mg/L, respectively. The prevalence of CKD in this population using the MDRD, the CKD-EPI, the CKD-EPI Cys and the CKD-EPI mix equations was 13%, 9.8%, 4.7% and 5%, respectively. The prevalence of CKD was significantly higher with the creatinine-based (MDRD and the CKD-EPI) equations compared to the new cystatin C-based equations.

Conclusions

Prevalence of CKD varies strongly depending on the method used to estimate GFR. Such discrepancies are of importance and must be confirmed and explained by additional studies, notably by studies using GFR measured with a reference method.

Trial registration

B70720071509