CKD Progression in Medicare Beneficiaries With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Apixaban Versus Warfarin

Oral anticoagulant treatment and risk of kidney disease-a nationwide, population-based cohort study

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line treatment of atrial fibrillation. Whether DOAC use is associated with lower risks of kidney complications compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remains unclear. We examined this association in a nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study including patients initiating oral anticoagulant treatment within 3 months after an atrial fibrillation diagnosis in Denmark during 2012-18. Using routinely collected creatinine measurements from laboratory databases, we followed patients in an intention-to-treat approach for acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. We used propensity-score weighting to balance baseline confounders, computed weighted risks and weighted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing DOACs with VKAs. We performed several subgroup analyses and a per-protocol analysis.

Results

We included 32 781 persons with atrial fibrillation initiating oral anticoagulation (77% initiating DOACs). The median age was 75 years, 25% had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and median follow-up was 2.3 (interquartile range 1.1-3.9) years. The weighted 1-year risks of AKI were 13.6% in DOAC users and 15.0% in VKA users (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82; 0.91). The weighted 5-year risks of CKD progression were 13.9% in DOAC users and 15.4% in VKA users (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79; 0.92). Results were similar across subgroups and in the per-protocol analysis.

Conclusions

Initiation of DOACs was associated with a decreased risk of AKI and CKD progression compared with VKAs. Despite the potential limitations of observational studies, our findings support the need for increased clinical awareness to prevent kidney complications among patients who initiate oral anticoagulants.

Apixaban reduces the risk of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with end stage renal disease; a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten studies

Optimal anticoagulation in patients with end-stage renal disease ESRD is a matter of debate since these patients are not included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Evolving data are in favor of apixaban compared to warfarin.

METHODS

We extracted data from 2 RCTs, 5 retrospective cohort studies and 3 large data-based studies. Both dosing regimens of apixaban, standard or reduced, were accepted. In most studies characteristics of patients were balanced between arms. Patients with either atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) were included. Quality of studies was graded as high and the funnel plot did not detect any publication bias. In total we analyzed the outcome of 6693 ESRD patients treated with apixaban and 19,836 treated with warfarin. Our analysis was performed by using the random effects model. We report our data as Risk Ratio (RR) and associated 95 % confidence interval values (95 %, CI).

RESULTS

The RR (95 % CI) of major bleeding was 0.69 (0.57-0.84) p = 0.0002 in favor of apixaban vs warfarin with heterogeneity to be statistically significant I2 63% p = 0.004. Meta-regression analysis with year of publication as moderator shows in bubble plotting that studies published earlier than 2018 were plotted as outliers. The RR (95 % CI) of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) was 0.74 (0.64-0.87) p = 0.0002 favoring again apixaban. Standard apixaban dose over reduced dose is less hemorrhagic compared to warfarin. Overall, in our study the risk of thrombosis in both arms was statistically non-different.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study we observed less hemorrhagic events with apixaban in ESRD patients compared to warfarin.

The impact of anticoagulation therapy on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are closely related. These diseases share common risk factors and are associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events. Choosing the appropriate oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) in patients with AF and CKD is challenging. Deterioration of renal function is common in patients with AF treated with OACs, although not all OACs affect the kidneys equally.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge of the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with AF and CKD, focusing on the impact of specific OAC agents on renal function.

EXPERT OPINION

Consideration of OAC use is mandatory in patients with AF and CKD who are at increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Available evidence suggests that the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is associated with slower deterioration of renal function in comparison to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Hence, a NOAC should be used in preference to VKAs in all NOAC-eligible patients with AF and CKD. Regarding patients with end-stage renal dysfunction and those on dialysis or renal replacement therapy, the use of NOAC should be considered in line with locally relevant formal recommendations.

A Novel Chronic Kidney Disease Phenotyping Algorithm Using Combined Electronic Health Record and Claims Data

Purpose

Because chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often under-coded as a diagnosis in claims data, we aimed to develop claims-based prediction models for CKD phenotypes determined by laboratory results in electronic health records (EHRs).

Patients and Methods

We linked EHR from two networks (used as training and validation cohorts, respectively) with Medicare claims data. The study cohort included individuals ≥65 years with a valid serum creatinine result in the EHR from 2007 to 2017, excluding those with end-stage kidney disease or on dialysis. We used LASSO regression to select among 134 predictors for predicting continuous estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We assessed the model performance when predicting eGFR categories of <60, <45, <30 mL/min/1.73m2 in terms of area under the receiver operating curves (AUC).

Results

The model training cohort included 117,476 patients (mean age 74.8 years, female 58.2%) and the validation cohort included 56,744 patients (mean age 73.8 years, female 59.6%). In the validation cohort, the AUC of the primary model (with 113 predictors and an adjusted R2 of 0.35) for predicting eGFR <60, eGFR<45, and eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 categories was 0.81, 0.88, and 0.92, respectively, and the corresponding positive predictive values for these 3 phenotypes were 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.79, 0.81), 0.79 (0.75, 0.84), and 0.38 (0.30, 0.45), respectively.

Conclusion

We developed a claims-based model to determine clinical phenotypes of CKD stages defined by eGFR values. Researchers without access to laboratory results can use the model-predicted phenotypes as a proxy clinical endpoint or confounder and to enhance subgroup effect assessment.

Cardiorenal Outcomes Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Oral Anticoagulants

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have progressively replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). DOACs cause fewer bleeding complications, but their other advantages, particularly related to kidney outcomes, remain inconclusive. We studied the risks of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and acute kidney injury (AKI) after DOAC and VKA administration for nonvalvular AF.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Cohort study of Swedish patients enrolled in the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project with a diagnosis of nonvalvular AF during 2011-2018.

EXPOSURE

Initiation of DOAC or VKA treatment.

OUTCOME

Primary outcomes were CKD progression (composite of >30% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline and kidney failure) and AKI (by diagnosis or KDIGO-defined transient creatinine elevations). Secondary outcomes were death, major bleeding, and the composite of stroke and systemic embolism.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Propensity score weighted Cox regression was used to balance 50 baseline confounders. Sensitivity analyses included falsification end points, subgroups, and estimation of per-protocol effects.

RESULTS

We included 32,699 patients (56% initiated DOAC) who were observed for a median of 3.8 years. Their median age was 75 years, 45% were women, and 27% had an eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m². The adjusted HRs for DOAC versus VKA were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) for the risk of CKD progression and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.97) for AKI. HRs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89) for major bleeding, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78-1.11) for the composite of stroke and systemic embolism, and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.95-1.14) for death. The results were similar across subgroups of age, sex, and baseline eGFR when restricting to patients at high risk for thromboembolic events and when censoring follow up at treatment discontinuation or change in type of anticoagulation.

LIMITATIONS

Missing information on time in therapeutic range and treatment dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with nonvalvular AF treated in routine clinical practice compared with VKA use, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of CKD progression, AKI, and major bleeding but a similar risk of the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death.

Effects of direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists on acute kidney injury in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review

Background

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are routinely prescribed oral anticoagulants to prevent thromboembolism. Concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants, such as vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), arise for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) because of their widespread use in clinical practice. Even though there have been an abundance of studies on this topic, it is still not clear if DOAC users with NVAF have a lower risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) than warfarin users.

Methods and results

We conducted electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies for this systematic review. We included randomized clinical trials and observational studies that reported on the incidence rate, hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of AKI in patients using oral anticoagulants. This systemic review included six observational studies and four randomized clinical trials (RCT). The overall results showed that DOACs were associated with a lower AKI risk than warfarin. However, for NVAF patients with severe renal dysfunction, DOACs may not have a reduced risk of AKI compared to warfarin.

Conclusion

The overall results suggest that, except for edoxaban, patients using DOACs may experience a reduced risk of AKI. However, it is uncertain whether this is also the case for patients with severe renal dysfunction. Further research is needed to confirm the effect of DOACs on this population.

Defining measures of kidney function in observational studies using routine health care data: methodological and reporting considerations

The availability of electronic health records and access to a large number of routine measurements of serum creatinine and urinary albumin enhance the possibilities for epidemiologic research in kidney disease. However, the frequency of health care use and laboratory testing is determined by health status and indication, imposing certain challenges when identifying patients with kidney injury or disease, when using markers of kidney function as covariates, or when evaluating kidney outcomes. Depending on the specific research question, this may influence the interpretation, generalizability, and/or validity of study results. This review illustrates the heterogeneity of working definitions of kidney disease in the scientific literature and discusses advantages and limitations of the most commonly used approaches using 3 examples. We summarize ways to identify and overcome possible biases and conclude by proposing a framework for reporting definitions of exposures and outcomes in studies of kidney disease using routinely collected health care data.

Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease: Insights of Cardiologists and Nephrologists From India

Introduction Patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Diligent anticoagulant therapy that prevents major bleeding is essential for stroke prevention. There is a dearth of evidence and guidance on anticoagulation in this patient subset. Methods A validated questionnaire was sent to 500 physicians across India. Anonymized responses from 353 consenting physicians (275 cardiologists and 78 nephrologists) were analyzed. Results Most physicians opined that the risk of progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2-4 to ESRD was 1-5%, and that >10% of patients with ESRD had concomitant AF. Most physicians perceived that the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mortality was 30-40%, <15%, and >40% respectively in patients with concomitant AF and ESRD. The first critical goal for the management of these patients was 'reduction of thrombotic risk', followed by 'prevention of bleeding' and finally 'prevention of ESRD progression' (72.0%, 68.0%, and 67.1% participants, respectively). Most participating physicians (93.8%) preferred non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin for stroke prevention, and most of the participating physicians (94.9%) preferred an adjusted dose rather than the standard dose of the NOAC. Most of the responses were similar between cardiologists and nephrologists. Conclusion According to the survey response, patients with concomitant AF and ESRD have an increased risk of thrombosis, bleeding, and mortality. NOACs with dose adjustment are the preferred modality for stroke prevention among cardiologists and nephrologists in India, with the primary goal of preventing thrombotic events.

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Should dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation receive oral anticoagulation?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for presenting atrial fibrillation (AF), which conditions an increased risk already present in CKD of suffering a thromboembolic event. And this risk is even higher in the hemodialysis (HD) population. On the other hand, in CKD patients and even more so in HD patients, the probability of suffering serious bleeding is also higher. Therefore, there is no consensus on whether or not to anticoagulate this population. Taking as a model what is advised for the general population, the most common attitude among nephrologists has been to opt for anticoagulation, even though there is no randomized studies to support it. Classically, anticoagulation has been done with vitamin K antagonists, at high cost for our patients: severe bleeding events, vascular calcification, and progression of nephropathy, among other complications. With the emergence of direct-acting anticoagulants, a hopeful outlook was opened in the field of anticoagulation, as they were postulated as more effective and safer drugs than antivitamin K. However, in clinical practice, this has not been the case. In this paper we review various aspects of AF and its anticoagulant treatment in the HD population.

Comparing the renal outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare renal function changes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) prescribed different oral anticoagulants (OACs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Australian national primary care data. A total of 12,562 patients with AF and initiated OAC between 1 Jan 2013 and 31 Dec 2017 were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for balancing baseline characteristics and the risks of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients prescribed each OAC were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Compared with warfarin, prescribing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with a lower risk of renal function decline per 1000 person-years: hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.81, p<0.001 for ≥30% decline in eGFR; HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.41, p<0.001 for eGFR decline to ≤30 mL/min/1.73m²; and HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, p<0.001 for serum creatinine doubling. Compared with dabigatran, rivaroxaban use had a significantly lowered risk of decline in eGFR to ≤30 mL/min/1.73m² (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p=0.003) and risk of doubling of serum creatinine (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.95, p=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of renal function decline appeared to be lower in patients prescribed DOACs versus warfarin.

Real world data of anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation across renal function status

The objective is to assess the impact of anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and different categories of renal dysfunction in real world. Electronic Health recordings of patients with diagnosis of AF and renal function collected throughout 5 years and classified according to KDIGO categories. Stroke, transitory ischemic attack (TIA), intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality were identified. Anticoagulant treatments during the study period were classified in untreated (never received therapy), VKA, NOAC and Aspirin. The risk of events was calculated by Cox-proportional hazard models adjusted by confounders. A total of 65,734 patients with AF, mean age 73.3 ± 10.49 years old and 47% females and follow-up of 3.2 years were included. KDIGO classification were: G1 33,903 (51.6%), G2 17,456 (26.6%), G3 8024 (12.2%) and G4 6351 (9.7%). There were 8592 cases of stroke and TIA, 437 intracranial hemorrhage, and 9603 all-cause deaths (incidence 36, 2 and 38 per 10³ person/year, respectively). 4.1% of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc Score 2 or higher did not receive anticoagulant therapy. Risk of stroke, TIA, and all-cause mortality increased from G1 to G4 groups. Anticoagulant treatments reduced the risk of events in the four categories, but NOAC seemed to offer significantly better protection. Renal dysfunction increases the risk of events in AF and anticoagulant treatments reduced the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality, although NOAC were better than VKA. Efforts should be done to reduce the variability in the use of anticoagulants even in this high risk group.

IgA nephropathy is the most common underlying disease in patients with anticoagulant-related nephropathy

Introduction

Anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) is a relatively novel recognized entity characterized by hematuria-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in the context of overanticoagulation. Preexisting or underlying kidney disease seems to be a predisposing factor; however, few studies have described histologic findings in patients with ARN. We aimed to evaluate underlying kidney pathology in patients on oral anticoagulation who presented an episode of AKI with hematuria in whom a kidney biopsy was performed.

Methods

Retrospective observational multicenter case study in patients treated with oral anticoagulants who developed macroscopic or intense hematuria followed by AKI. Only patients with available kidney biopsy specimens were included. Histologic findings and clinical data throughout follow-up were analyzed.

Results

A total of 26 patients were included with a median age of 75 years (62–80) and a follow-up period of 10.1 months. Of the patients, 80% were male, and most cases (92%) were on anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). At admission, median serum creatinine (SCr) level was 4.2 mg/dl (2.8–8.2), median international normalized ratio (INR) 2.4 (1.5–3.4), and 11 patients (42%) required acute dialysis during hospitalization. Kidney biopsy results revealed that all patients except 1 had an underlying nephropathy: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in 19, probable IgAN in 1, diabetic nephropathy in 3, nephrosclerosis in 1, and idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis in 1. At 12 weeks after discharge, only 6 subjects (24%) attained complete kidney recovery whereas 7 (28%) remained on chronic dialysis.

Conclusion

IgAN was the most common underlying kidney disease in our biopsy-proven series of ARN, in which a significant percentage of patients did not achieve kidney function recovery.

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in CKD: Role of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a close bidirectional relationship between the two entities. The presence of CKD in AF increases the risk of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF until recently, with confirmed benefits in AF patients with stage 3 CKD. However, the risk-benefit profile of VKA in patients with AF and stages 4-5 CKD is controversial due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Treatment with VKA in CKD patients has been associated with conditions such as poorer anticoagulation quality, increased risk of bleeding, faster progression of vascular/valvular calcification and higher risk of calciphylaxis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown equal or greater efficacy in stroke/systemic embolism prevention, and a better safety profile than VKA in post-hoc analysis of the pivotal randomized controlled trials in patients with non-valvular AF and stage 3 CKD, yet evidence of its risk-benefit profile in more advanced stages of CKD is scarce. Observational studies associate DOACs with a good safety/effectiveness profile compared to VKA in non-dialysis CKD patients. Further, DOACs have been associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury and CKD development/progression than VKA. This narrative review summarizes the evidence of the efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF at different CKD stages, as well as their effects on renal function, vascular/valvular calcification and bone health.