Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: A KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Controversies Conference

Associations between lipoprotein(a), oxidized phospholipids, and extracoronary vascular disease

The roles of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and related oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) in the development and progression of coronary disease is known, but their influence on extracoronary vascular disease is not well-established. We sought to evaluate associations between Lp(a), OxPL apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB), and apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo(a)) with angiographic extracoronary vascular disease and incident major adverse limb events (MALEs). Four hundred forty-six participants who underwent coronary and/or peripheral angiography were followed up for a median of 3.7 years. Lp(a) and OxPLs were measured before angiography. Elevated Lp(a) was defined as ≥150 nmol/L. Elevated OxPL-apoB and OxPL-apo(a) were defined as greater than or equal to the 75th percentile (OxPL-apoB ≥8.2 nmol/L and OxPL-apo(a) ≥35.8 nmol/L, respectively). Elevated Lp(a) had a stronger association with the presence of extracoronary vascular disease compared to OxPLs and was minimally improved with the addition of OxPLs in multivariable models. Compared to participants with normal Lp(a) and OxPL concentrations, participants with elevated Lp(a) levels were twice as likely to experience a MALE (odds ratio: 2.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 4.44), and the strength of the association as well as the C statistic of 0.82 was largely unchanged with the addition of OxPL-apoB and OxPL-apo(a). Elevated Lp(a) and OxPLs are risk factors for progression and complications of extracoronary vascular disease. However, the addition of OxPLs to Lp(a) does not provide additional information about risk of extracoronary vascular disease. Therefore, Lp(a) alone captures the risk profile of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) in the development and progression of atherosclerotic plaque in peripheral arteries.

Improving outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease: importance of clinical presentation and multi-disciplinary review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may cause hypertension, chronic kidney disease and heart failure, but large randomized control trials to date have shown no major additional benefit of renal revascularization over optimal medical management. However, these trials did not consider outcomes specifically in relation to clinical presentations. Given that atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a heterogenous condition, measures of success likely differ according to the clinical presentation. Our retrospective study objectives were to determine the effects of revascularization when applied to specific clinical presentations and after careful multi-disciplinary team review.

METHODS

All patients presenting to our centre and its referring hospitals with radiological findings of at least one renal artery stenosis > 50% between January 2015 and January 2020 were reviewed at the renovascular multi-disciplinary team meeting with revascularization considered in accordance with international guidelines, notably for patients with anatomically significant renal artery stenosis, adequately sized kidney and presentations with any of; deteriorating kidney function, heart failure syndrome, or uncontrollable hypertension. Optimal medical management was recommended for all patients which included lipid lowering agents, anti-platelets and anti-hypertensives targeting blood pressure ≤ 130/80 mmHg. The effect of revascularization was assessed according to the clinical presentation; blood pressure and number of agents in those with renovascular hypertension, delta glomerular filtration rate in those with ischaemic nephropathy and heart failure re-admissions in those with heart failure syndromes.

RESULTS

During this 5-year period, 127 patients with stenosis ≥ 50% were considered by the multidisciplinary team, with 57 undergoing revascularization (17 primarily for severe hypertension, 25 deteriorating kidney function, 6 heart failure syndrome and 9 for very severe anatomical stenosis). Seventy-nine percent of all revascularized patients had a positive outcome specific to their clinical presentation, with 82% of those with severe hypertension improving blood pressure control, 72% with progressive ischaemic nephropathy having attenuated GFR decline, and no further heart failure admissions in those with heart failure. Seventy-eight percent of patients revascularized for high grade stenosis alone had better blood pressure control with 55% also manifesting renal functional benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-disciplinary team discussion successfully identified a group of patients more likely to benefit from revascularization based on 3 key factors: clinical presentation, severity of the renal artery lesion and the state of the kidney beyond the stenotic lesion. In this way, a large proportion of patients can clinically improve after revascularization if their outcomes are considered according to the nature of their clinical presentation.

Bilateral renal artery revascularisation in heart failure

Renal artery stenosis can complicate the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, as it is a conventional contraindication to the use of ACE inhibitors. We report a case in which bilateral renal artery revascularisation allowed the safe reintroduction of enalapril (and subsequently sacubitril valsartan) in a patient with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. There is a role for renal artery angioplasty in selected patients to allow optimal medical therapy for patients with heart failure due to impaired systolic function.

CT-based radiomics: predicting early outcomes after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty in patients with severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate non-contrast computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics for predicting early outcomes in patients with severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA). A total of 52 patients were retrospectively recruited, and their clinical characteristics and pretreatment CT images were collected. During a median follow-up period of 3.7 mo, 18 patients were confirmed to have benefited from the treatment, defined as a 20% improvement from baseline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate. A deep learning network trained via self-supervised learning was used to enhance the imaging phenotype characteristics. Radiomics features, comprising 116 handcrafted features and 78 deep learning features, were extracted from the affected renal and perirenal adipose regions. More features from the latter were correlated with early outcomes, as determined by univariate analysis, and were visually represented in radiomics heatmaps and volcano plots. After using consensus clustering and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method for feature selection, five machine learning models were evaluated. Logistic regression yielded the highest leave-one-out cross-validation accuracy of 0.780 (95%CI: 0.660-0.880) for the renal signature, while the support vector machine achieved 0.865 (95%CI: 0.769-0.942) for the perirenal adipose signature. SHapley Additive exPlanations was used to visually interpret the prediction mechanism, and a histogram feature and a deep learning feature were identified as the most influential factors for the renal signature and perirenal adipose signature, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that both signatures served as independent predictive factors. When combined, they achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.888 (95%CI: 0.784-0.992), indicating that the imaging phenotypes from both regions complemented each other. In conclusion, non-contrast CT-based radiomics can be leveraged to predict the early outcomes of PTRA, thereby assisting in identifying patients with ARAS suitable for this treatment, with perirenal adipose tissue providing added predictive value.

Characteristics and predictors of low-grade renal artery stenosis in female patients with CKD

AIM

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is an important cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The main purpose of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics and predictors of low-grade RAS in female patients with CKD.

METHODS

One hundred and five female CKD patients from Huadong Hospital affiliated with Fudan University who underwent 3 T non-contrast renal artery magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were analyzed. Basic statistics methods were used in the study, such as independent-sample t test,non-parametric test, binary logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis.

RESULTS

In this cross-sectional study, there were 50 patients with RAS and 55 without RAS (47.6% versus 52.4%). Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that low-level ALB and lymphocyte count, high-level SP, BUN and NLR were independent risk factors for low-grade RAS in female patients with CKD. ROC analysis indicated that eGFR, FeNa and UBCR, ALB, lymphocyte count and NLR had the best predictive value for low-grade RAS, especially eGFR with a sensitivity of 65.50% and specificity of 72.00% and FeNa with a sensitivity of 71.10% and specificity of 72.20% and BUCR with a sensitivity of 71.10% and specificity of 68.10%.

CONCLUSION

In female patients with CKD, FeNa, eGFR, ALB, UBCR, lymphocyte count and NLR may be good predictors of low-grade RAS, especially eGFR, FeNa and BUCR.

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a clinical practice document by the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA) and the Working Group Hypertension and the Kidney of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH)

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is the most common type of renal artery stenosis. It represents a common health problem with clinical presentations relevant to many medical specialties and carries a high risk for future cardiovascular and renal events, as well as overall mortality. The available evidence regarding the management of ARVD is conflicting. Randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate superiority of percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty (PTRA) with or without stenting in addition to standard medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone in lowering blood pressure levels or preventing adverse renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ARVD, but they carried several limitations and met important criticism. Observational studies showed that PTRA is associated with future cardiorenal benefits in patients presenting with high-risk ARVD phenotypes (i.e. flash pulmonary oedema, resistant hypertension or rapid loss of kidney function). This clinical practice document, prepared by experts from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA) and from the Working Group on Hypertension and the Kidney of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), summarizes current knowledge in epidemiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic assessment of ARVD and presents, following a systematic literature review, key evidence relevant to treatment, with an aim to support clinicians in decision making and everyday management of patients with this condition.

Endovascular treatments of atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a narrative review and literature search

In recent years, endovascular treatments have become more common in patients with renal artery stenosis and aneurysm. Although the treatment algorithms are not universally accepted, endovascular therapy can be readily utilized for the appropriate indications in the context of surgical treatment for renovascular diseases. The most important factor to consider is that the correct indication is applied for such treatment. Although the applied procedures are believed to have minimal risk, any complications that occur may result in major problems. Moreover, the pathology that is being treated (e.g., hypertension, high serum creatinine concentration, or low glomerular filtration rate) must be well defined. As stent and balloon technologies continue to be developed, more positive results are expected in the coming years. In the present study, we reviewed the endovascular treatment algorithms for atherosclerotic renovascular disease and performed a narrative review of the current literature.

Recurrent flash pulmonary edema in unilateral renal artery stenosis with contralateral kidney shrinkage: A case report

RATIONALE

Flash pulmonary edema is a critical medical condition characterized by sudden and severe fluid accumulation in the lungs, which poses an immediate and life-threatening emergency. This can arise from a variety of underlying causes. This manuscript presents a case of recurrent pulmonary edema that was successfully managed through the insertion of a renal artery stent.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 78-year-old woman visited the emergency room with recurrent acute dyspnea. Computed tomography renal angiography revealed renal artery stenosis of a single-functioning kidney.

DIAGNOSES

Flash pulmonary edema caused by renal artery stenosis of a functioning single kidney.

INTERVENTIONS

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting were performed for the renal artery stenosis.

OUTCOMES

The patient's kidney function rapidly improved, and she has been free of flash pulmonary edema for 2 years.

LESSONS

Flash pulmonary edema can have various causes and can immediately be a life-threatening emergency. However, it can be treated with percutaneous revascularization if it is caused by renal artery stenosis. This case report reinforces the importance of accurate and immediate diagnosis when dealing with flash pulmonary edema. This case emphasizes the potential therapeutic benefit of renal artery stenting in the management of flash pulmonary edema caused by renal artery stenosis in patients with a single-functioning kidney.

Stem Cells in Kidney Ischemia: From Inflammation and Fibrosis to Renal Tissue Regeneration

Ischemic nephropathy consists of progressive renal function loss due to renal hypoxia, inflammation, microvascular rarefaction, and fibrosis. We provide a literature review focused on kidney hypoperfusion-dependent inflammation and its influence on renal tissue's ability to self-regenerate. Moreover, an overview of the advances in regenerative therapy with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) infusion is provided. Based on our search, we can point out the following conclusions: 1. endovascular reperfusion is the gold-standard therapy for RAS, but its success mostly depends on treatment timeliness and a preserved downstream vascular bed; 2. anti-RAAS drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and/or anti-endothelin agents are especially recommended for patients with renal ischemia who are not eligible for endovascular reperfusion for slowing renal damage progression; 3. TGF-β, MCP-1, VEGF, and NGAL assays, along with BOLD MRI, should be extended in clinical practice and applied to a pre- and post-revascularization protocols; 4. MSC infusion appears effective in renal regeneration and could represent a revolutionary treatment for patients with fibrotic evolution of renal ischemia.

Revascularization for Renovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Renovascular disease is a major causal factor for secondary hypertension and renal ischemic disease. However, several prospective, randomized trials for atherosclerotic disease failed to demonstrate that renal revascularization is more effective than medical therapy for most patients. These results have greatly reduced the generalized diagnostic workup and use of renal revascularization. Most guidelines and review articles emphasize the limited average improvement and fail to identify those clinical populations that do benefit from revascularization. On the basis of the clinical experience of hypertension centers, specialists have continued selective revascularization, albeit without a summary statement by a major, multidisciplinary, national organization that identifies specific populations that may benefit. In this scientific statement for health care professionals and the public-at-large, we review the strengths and weaknesses of randomized trials in revascularization and highlight (1) when referral for consideration of diagnostic workup and therapy may be warranted, (2) the evidence/rationale for these selective scenarios, (3) interventional and surgical techniques for effective revascularization, and (4) areas of research with unmet need.

Renal artery stenting in the correct patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease: time for a proper renal and cardiovascular outcome study?

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) represents the most common type of renal artery stenosis. In the last decade, a few large trials failed to demonstrate the superiority of standard medical therapy plus percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) compared with medical therapy alone in lowering blood pressure levels or preventing adverse renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ARVD. However, this issue remains controversial and an ongoing debate focusses on the benefits that selected patients could experience from renal revascularization procedures. In this regard, several pieces of observational data show that PTRA is associated with future cardiorenal benefits in patients presenting with high-risk ARVD phenotypes. Such evidence resulted in a progressive shift in relevant recommendations, with most recent not-graded suggestions supporting that revascularization should be offered in these high-risk subjects. Existing evidence clearly calls for a properly designed randomized controlled trial with selected patients presenting high-risk ARVD phenotypes, in order to confirm the superiority of PTRA versus non-invasive management in this patient group and objectively guide everyday clinical practice.

Renal Artery Stenting in Consecutive High-Risk Patients With Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: A Prospective 2-Center Cohort Study

Background

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effects of renal artery stenting in consecutive patients with severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and high‐risk clinical presentations as defined in a national protocol developed in 2015.

Methods and Results

Since the protocol was initiated, 102 patients have been referred for revascularization according to the following high‐risk criteria: severe renal artery stenosis (≥70%) with true resistant hypertension, rapidly declining kidney function, or recurrent heart failure/sudden pulmonary edema. At baseline, the mean 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was 166.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 162.0–170.4), the defined daily dose of antihypertensive medication was 6.5 (95% CI, 5.8–7.3), and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 41.1 mL/min per 1.73m² (95% CI, 36.6–45.6). In 96 patients with available 3‐month follow‐up data, mean 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure decreased by 19.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 15.4–23.8; P<0.001), the defined daily dose of antihypertensive medication was reduced by 52% (95% CI, 41%–62%; P<0.001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased by 7.8 mL/min per 1.73m² (95% CI, 4.5–11.1; P<0.001). All changes persisted after 24 month follow‐up. Among 17 patients with a history of hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure, 14 patients had no new episodes after successful revascularization.

Conclusions

In this prospective cohort study, we observed a reduction in blood pressure and antihypertensive medication, an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and a decrease in new hospital admissions attributable to heart failure/sudden pulmonary edema after renal artery stenting.

Registration

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02770066.