Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and activity of the PKC412 inhibitor against imatinib-resistant mutants

Four and a half LIM domains 2 (FHL2) attenuates tumorigenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by negatively regulating KIT signaling

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are predominately induced by KIT mutants. In this study, we found that four and a half LIM domains 2 (FHL2) was highly expressed in GISTs and KIT signaling dramatically increased FHL2 transcription while FHL2 inhibited KIT transcription. In addition, our results showed that FHL2 associated with KIT and increased the ubiquitination of both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutants in GISTs, leading to decreased expression and activation of KIT although primary KIT mutants were less inhibited by FHL2 than wild-type KIT. In the animal experiments, loss of FHL2 expression in mice carrying germline KIT/V558A mutation which can develop GISTs resulted in increased tumor growth, but increased sensitivity of GISTs to imatinib treatment which is used as the first-line targeted therapy of GISTs, suggesting that FHL2 plays a role in the response of GISTs to KIT inhibitor. Unlike wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutants, we further found that FHL2 didn't alter the expression and activation of drug-resistant secondary KIT mutants. Taken together, our results indicated that FHL2 acts as the negative feedback of KIT signaling in GISTs while primary KIT mutants are less sensitive and secondary KIT mutants are resistant to the inhibition of FHL2.

RAF1 facilitates KIT signaling and serves as a potential treatment target for gastrointestinal stromal tumor

The aberrant activation of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is important for KIT mutation-mediated tumorigenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In this study, we found that inhibition of RAF1 suppresses the activation of both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutations in GIST, with primary KIT mutations showing greater sensitivity. This suggests a positive feedback loop between KIT and RAF1, wherein RAF1 facilitates KIT signaling. We further demonstrated that RAF1 associates with KIT and the kinase activity of RAF1 is necessary for its contribution to KIT activation. Accordingly, inhibition of RAF1 suppressed cell survival, proliferation, and cell cycle progression in vitro mediated by both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutations. Inhibition of RAF1 in vivo suppressed GIST growth in a transgenic mouse model carrying germline KIT/V558A mutation, showing a similar treatment efficiency as imatinib, the first-line targeted therapeutic drug of GIST, while the combination use of imatinib and RAF1 inhibitor further suppressed tumor growth. Acquisition of drug-resistant secondary mutation of KIT is a major cause of treatment failure of GIST following targeted therapy. Like wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutations, inhibition of RAF1 suppressed the activation of secondary KIT mutation, and the cell survival, proliferation, cell cycle progression in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo mediated by secondary KIT mutation. However, the activation of secondary KIT mutation is less dependent on RAF1 compared with that of primary KIT mutations. Taken together, our results revealed that RAF1 facilitates KIT signaling and KIT mutation-mediated tumorigenesis of GIST, providing a rationale for further investigation into the use of RAF1 inhibitors alone or in combination with KIT inhibitor in the treatment of GIST, particularly in cases resistant to KIT inhibitors.

TRIM21/USP15 balances ACSL4 stability and the imatinib resistance of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has become an exceptionally effective targeted drug for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Despite its efficacy, the resistance to imatinib is common in GIST patients, posing a significant challenge to the effective treatment.

METHODS

The expression profiling of TRIM21, USP15, and ACSL4 in GIST patients was evaluated using Western blot and immunohistochemistry. To silence gene expression, shRNA was utilized. Biological function of TRIM21, USP15, and ACSL4 was examined through various methods, including resistance index calculation, colony formation, shRNA interference, and xenograft mouse model. The molecular mechanism of TRIM21 and USP15 in GIST was determined by conducting Western blot, co-immunoprecipitation, and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses.

RESULTS

Here we demonstrated that downregulation of ACSL4 is associated with imatinib (IM) resistance in GIST. Moreover, clinical data showed that higher levels of ACSL4 expression are positively correlated with favorable clinical outcomes. Mechanistic investigations further indicated that the reduced expression of ACSL4 in GIST is attributed to excessive protein degradation mediated by the E3 ligase TRIM21 and the deubiquitinase USP15.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that the TRIM21 and USP15 control ACSL4 stability to maintain the IM sensitive/resistant status of GIST.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic evaluation of hyaluronic acid-modified imatinib-loaded PEGylated liposomes in CD44-positive Gist882 tumor-bearing mice

To develop a PEGylated and CD44-targeted liposomes, enabled by surface coating with hyaluronic acid (HA) via amide bond to improve the efficacy of imatinib mesylate (IM), for tumor-targeted cytoplasmic drug delivery. HA was covalently grafted on DSPE-PEG2000-NH2 polymer. HA-modified or unmodified PEGylated liposomes were prepared with ethanol injection method, and the stability, drug release, and cytotoxicity of these liposomes were studied. Meanwhile, intracellular drug delivery efficiency, antitumor efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were also investigated. Ex vivo fluorescence biodistribution was also detected by small animal imaging. In addition, endocytosis mechanism was also explored HA-coated PEGylated liposomes (137.5 nm ± 10.24) had a negative zeta potential (-29.3 mV ± 5.44) and high drug loading (27.8%, w/w). The liposomes were stable with cumulative drug leakage (<60%) under physiological conditions. Blank liposomes were nontoxic to Gist882 cells, and IM-loaded liposomes had higher cytotoxicity to Gist882 cells. HA-modified PEGylated liposomes were internalized more effectively than non-HA coating via CD44-mediated endocytosis. Besides, the cellular uptake of HA-modified liposomes also partly depends on caveolin-medicated endocytosis and micropinocytosis. In rats, both liposomes produced a prolonged half-life of IM (HA/Lp/IM: 14.97h; Lp/IM: 11.15h) by 3- to 4.5-folds compared with the IM solution (3.61h). HA-decorated PEGylated liposomes encapsulated IM exhibited strong inhibitory effect on tumor growth in Gist882 cell-bearing nude mice and formation of 2D/3D tumor spheroids. The Ki67 immunohistochemistry result was consistent with the above results. IM-loaded PEGylated liposomes modified with HA exerted the excellent anti-tumor effect on tumor-bearing mice and more drugs accumulated into the tumor site.

Multistage in silico approach to identify novel quinoline derivatives as potential c-kit kinase inhibitors

The type II-C-KIT signaling network has been extensively studied for its potential as a target for cancer treatment, leading to the investigation of quinoline derivatives as compounds with inhibitory effects on c-Kit kinase. In this study, a multistage approach was employed, including the creation of pharmacophore models, 3D QSAR analysis, virtual screening, docking investigations, and molecular dynamics stimulation. The pharmacophore evaluation included a data set of 29 ligands, which resulted in the generation of the ADDHR_1pharmacophore model as the most promising, with a survival score of 5.6812. The main objective was to utilize the atom-based 3D-QSAR approach for generating robust 3D-QSAR models aimed at identifying new TypeII-C-kit kinase inhibitors. The evaluations of these models have convincingly demonstrated their high predictive power (Q2 = 0.6547, R2 = 0.9947). Using atom-based 3D-QSAR data, a total of 7564 novel compounds were generated from R-group enumeration. Molecular docking and MM-GBSA study revealed that compound A1 exhibited the highest binding score of -9.30 kcal/mol and a Δ GBind value of -90.56 kcal/mol. The ZINC compounds were then screened using the pharmacophore model, followed by virtual screening, which identified ZINC65798256, ZINC09317958, ZINC73187176, and ZINC76176670 as potential candidates with promising docking scores. Among these, ZINC65798256 demonstrated the best binding interactions with amino acid residues, ASP810, LYS623, CYS673, and THR670 (PDB ID: 1T46). To further analyze the structural features and molecular interactions, molecular dynamics simulation was conducted for a time scale of 100 ns.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications

Advances in molecular genetics have revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis, progression, and therapeutic options for treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular landscape of GI cancers, focusing on key genetic alterations implicated in tumorigenesis across various anatomical sites including GIST, colon and rectum, and pancreas. Emphasis is placed on critical oncogenic pathways, such as mutations in tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic modifications. The role of molecular biomarkers in predicting prognosis, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring therapeutic response is discussed, highlighting the integration of genomic profiling into clinical practice. Finally, we address the evolving landscape of precision oncology in GI cancers, considering targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

DDR1/2 enhance KIT activation and imatinib resistance of primary and secondary KIT mutants in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are predominantly initiated by KIT mutations. In this study, we observed that discoidin domain receptors 1 and 2 (DDR1 and DDR2) exhibited high expression in GISTs, were associated with KIT, and enhanced the activation of both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutants. Inhibition of DDR1/2 led to a reduction in the activation of KIT and its downstream signaling molecules, ultimately impairing GIST cell survival and proliferation in vitro. Consequently, treatment of mice carrying germline KIT/V558A mutation with DDR1/2 inhibitor significantly impeded tumor growth, and the combined use of DDR1/2 inhibitor and imatinib, the first-line targeted therapeutic agent for GISTs, markedly enhanced tumor growth suppression. In addition, DDR1/2 inhibition resulted in decreased KIT expression, while KIT inhibition led to upregulation of DDR1/2 expression in GISTs. The presence of DDR1/2 also decreased the sensitivity of wild-type KIT or primary KIT mutants to imatinib, indicating a possible role for DDR1/2 in promoting GIST survival during KIT-targeted therapy. The development of drug-resistant secondary KIT mutations is a primary factor contributing to GIST recurrence following targeted therapy. Similar to primary KIT mutants, DDR1/2 can associate with and enhance the activation of secondary KIT mutants, further diminishing their sensitivity to imatinib. In summary, our data demonstrate that DDR1/2 contribute to KIT activation in GISTs and strengthen resistance to imatinib for both primary and secondary KIT mutants, providing a rationale for further exploration of DDR1/2 targeting in GIST treatment.

Sarcoma care in the era of precision medicine

Sarcoma subtype classification is currently mainly based upon histopathological morphology. Molecular analyses have emerged as an efficient addition to the diagnostic workup and sarcoma care. Knowledge about the sarcoma genome increases, and genetic events that can either support a histopathological diagnosis or suggest a differential diagnosis are identified, as well as novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we present diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic molecular markers that are, or might soon be, used clinically. For sarcoma diagnostics, there are specific fusions highly supportive or pathognomonic for a diagnostic entity-for instance, SYT::SSX in synovial sarcoma. Complex karyotypes also give diagnostic information-for example, supporting dedifferentiation rather than low-grade central osteosarcoma or well-differentiated liposarcoma when detected in combination with MDM2/CDK4 amplification. Molecular treatment predictive sarcoma markers are available for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and locally aggressive benign mesenchymal tumors. The molecular prognostic markers for sarcomas in clinical practice are few. For solitary fibrous tumor, the type of NAB2::STAT6 fusion is associated with the outcome, and the KIT/PDGFRA pathogenic variant in GISTs can give prognostic information. With the exploding availability of sequencing technologies, it becomes increasingly important to understand the strengths and limitations of those methods and their context in sarcoma diagnostics. It is reasonable to believe that most sarcoma treatment centers will increase the use of massive-parallel sequencing soon. We conclude that the context in which the genetic findings are interpreted is of importance, and the interpretation of genomic findings requires considering tumor histomorphology.

Ripretinib for the treatment of advanced, imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Discovery of constitutive activation of KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) leads to the development of the targeted drug imatinib. However, the inevitable development of imatinib resistance remains a major issue. Ripretinib is a novel targeted drug that inhibits the activities of a broad spectrum of drug-resistant KIT/PDGFRA mutants. It was approved in 2020 and is currently recommended by major international guidelines as the fourth-line and beyond therapy for advanced GISTs. Emerging evidence shows that ripretinib is superior to sunitinib as a second-line treatment for KIT exon 11-mutated GISTs due to its activity against highly heterogeneous frequently occurring secondary mutations. This review summarizes current data on the use of ripretinib to treat advanced imatinib-resistant GISTs. We also propose future research directions to improve the targeted GIST treatment.

A multiplatform metabolomics approach for comprehensive analysis of GIST xenografts with various KIT mutations

Metabolites in biological matrices belong to diverse chemical groups, ranging from non-polar long-chain fatty acids to small polar molecules. The goal of untargeted metabolomic analysis is to measure the highest number of metabolites in the sample. Nevertheless, from an analytical point of view, no single technique can measure such a broad spectrum of analytes. Therefore, we selected a method based on GC-MS and LC-MS with two types of stationary phases for the untargeted profiling of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. The procedure was applied to GIST xenograft samples (n = 71) representing four different mutation models, half of which were treated with imatinib. We aimed to verify the method coverage and advantages of applying each technique. RP-LC-MS measured most metabolites due to a significant fraction of lipid components of the tumour tissue. What is unique and worth noting is that all applied techniques were able to distinguish between different mutation models. However, for detecting imatinib-induced alterations in the GIST metabolome, RP-LC-MS and GC-MS proved to be more relevant than HILIC-LC-MS, resulting in a higher number of significantly changed metabolites in four treated models. Undoubtedly, the inclusion of all mentioned techniques makes the method more comprehensive. Nonetheless, for green chemistry and time and labour saving, we assume that RP-LC-MS and GC-MS analyses are sufficient to cover the global GIST metabolome.

Antitumor Efficacy of the Novel KIT Inhibitor IDRX-42 (Formerly M4205) in Patient- and Cell Line-Derived Xenograft Models of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

PURPOSE

The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by constitutively activated KIT/PDGFRA kinases and are susceptible to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. During treatment, most of these tumors will develop secondary mutations in KIT or PDGFRA inducing drug resistance, so there is an unmet need for novel therapies. We tested the efficacy of IDRX-42, a novel selective KIT inhibitor with high activity toward the most relevant KIT mutations, in 4 GIST xenograft models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

NMRI nu/nu mice were transplanted with patient-derived GIST xenograft models UZLX-GIST9 (KIT:p.P577del;W557LfsX5;D820G), UZLX-GIST2B (KIT:p.A502_Y503dup), UZLX-GIST25 (KIT:p.K642E), and the cell line-derived model GIST882 (KIT:p.K642E). Mice were treated daily with vehicle (control), imatinib (100 mg/kg), sunitinib (20 mg/kg), avapritinib (5 mg/kg), or IDRX-42 (10 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg). Efficacy was assessed by tumor volume evolution, histopathology, grading of histologic response, and IHC. The Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 considered as significant.

RESULTS

IDRX-42 (25 mg/kg) caused tumor volume shrinkage in UZLX-GIST25, GIST882, and UZLX-GIST2B, with a relative decrease to 45.6%, 57.3%, and 35.1% on the last day as compared with baseline, and tumor growth delay (160.9%) compared with control in UZLX-GIST9. Compared with controls, IDRX-42 (25 mg/kg) induced a significant decrease in mitosis. In UZLX-GIST25 and GIST882 grade 2-4 histologic response with myxoid degeneration was observed in all IDRX-42 (25 mg/kg)-treated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

IDRX-42 showed significant antitumor activity in patient- and cell line-derived GIST xenograft models. The novel kinase inhibitor induced volumetric responses, decreased mitotic activity, and had antiproliferative effects. In models with KIT exon 13 mutation IDRX-42 induced characteristic myxoid degeneration.

Molecular Advances in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by activating mutations in Proto-oncogene c-KIT (KIT) or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK). The emergence of effective therapies targeting these mutations has revolutionized the management of advanced GIST. However, following initiation of first-line imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), nearly all patients will develop resistance within 2 years through the emergence of secondary resistance mutations in KIT, typically in the Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)-binding site or activation loop of the kinase domain. Moreover, some patients have de novo resistance to imatinib, such as those with mutations in PDGFRA exon 18 or those without KIT or PDGFRA mutation. To target resistance, research efforts are primarily focused on developing next-generation inhibitors of KIT and/or PDGFRA, which can inhibit alternate receptor conformations or unique mutations, and compounds that impact complimentary pathogenic processes or epigenetic events. Here, we review the literature on the medical management of high-risk localized and advanced GIST and provide an update on clinical trial approaches to this disease.

Small Molecule c-KIT Inhibitors for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Review on Synthesis, Design Strategies, and Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR)

The proto-oncogenic protein, c-KIT, plays a crucial role in regulating cellular transformation and differentiation processes, such as proliferation, survival, adhesion, and chemotaxis. The overexpression of, and mutations, in c-KIT can lead to its dysregulation and promote various human cancers, particularly gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); approximately 80-85% of cases are associated with oncogenic mutations in the KIT gene. Inhibition of c-KIT has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for GISTs. However, the currently approved drugs are associated with resistance and significant side effects, highlighting the urgent need to develop highly selective c-KIT inhibitors that are not affected by these mutations for GISTs. Herein, the recent research efforts in medicinal chemistry aimed at developing potent small-molecule c-KIT inhibitors with high kinase selectivity for GISTs are discussed from a structure-activity relationship perspective. Moreover, the synthetic pathways, pharmacokinetic properties, and binding patterns of the inhibitors are also discussed to facilitate future development of more potent and pharmacokinetically stable small-molecule c-KIT inhibitors.

Current status of and future prospects for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are soft-tissue sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery is the standard treatment for localised disease, but the risk of relapse and progression to more advanced disease is substantial. Following the discovery of the molecular mechanisms underlying GISTs, targeted therapies for advanced GIST were developed, with the first being the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib. Imatinib is recommended in international guidelines as first-line therapy to reduce the risk of GIST relapse in high-risk patients, and for locally advanced, inoperable and metastatic disease. Unfortunately, imatinib resistance frequently occurs and, therefore, second-line (sunitinib) and third-line (regorafenib) TKIs have been developed. Treatment options are limited for patients with GIST that has progressed despite these therapies. A number of other TKIs for advanced/metastatic GIST have been approved in some countries. Ripretinib is approved as fourth-line treatment of GIST and avapritinib is approved for GIST harbouring specific genetic mutations, while larotrectinib and entrectinib are approved for solid tumours (including GIST) with specific genetic mutations. In Japan, pimitespib, a heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, is now available as a fourth-line therapy for GIST. Clinical studies of pimitespib have indicated that it has good efficacy and tolerability, importantly not displaying the ocular toxicity of previously developed HSP90 inhibitors. Additional approaches for advanced GIST have been investigated, including alternative uses of currently available TKIs (such as combination therapy), novel TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, and immunotherapies. Given the poor prognosis of advanced GIST, the development of new therapies remains an important goal.

Efficacy of post-first-line agents for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors following imatinib failure: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Imatinib is the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); however, most patients eventually develop imatinib resistance, leading to considerable clinical challenges. Few direct comparisons have been made between different post-first-line therapies on clinical efficacy in advanced GIST following imatinib failure.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholars, and Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023 were retrieved for randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of different post-first-line agents for advanced GIST following imatinib failure. Network and conventional meta-analysis were carried out using Stata/MP 16.0.

RESULTS

Ripretinib showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) rates from the 2nd to the 12th month compared to placebo, while there was virtually no evidence that the rest active agents had a significant benefit at the 12th month. Masitinib, ripretinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, and pimitespib exhibited significantly longer median PFS than placebo, and pairwise comparisons indicated there were no significant differences among masitinib, ripretinib, and sunitinib. These post-first-line agents decreased the risk of disease progression or death by 65% (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.26-0.47) compared to placebo. Ripretinib and sunitinib came into effect earlier and exhibited more consistent overall survival (OS) rate improvements than masitinib and pimitespib, while pairwise comparisons revealed no significant differences in these four active agents concerning the improvement in OS rate. These post-first-line agents decreased the risk of death by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.83) over placebo for advanced GIST following imatinib failure.

CONCLUSION

The active agents in our analysis as post-first-line therapies are able to provide superior clinical efficacy, with improved PFS rate and OS rate at certain time points, as well as absolute values of PFS and OS for advanced GIST. Ripretinib might be the optimal recommendation as a post-first-line treatment for advanced GIST following imatinib failure.

Deubiquitylation of Rab35 by USP32 promotes the transmission of imatinib resistance by enhancing exosome secretion in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Imatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is widely used to combat gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, secondary resistance to imatinib is an important challenge in GIST treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that cancer-derived nanosized exosomes play a key role in intercellular communication, but little is known about the roles of exosomes in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Here, we reveal that exosomes released from imatinib-resistant GISTs transmit drug resistance to imatinib-sensitive tumours. By using iTRAQ technology, we demonstrate that Ras-related protein Rab-35 (Rab35) is upregulated differentially in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Loss of Rab35 decreases exosome secretion, thereby hampering the transmission of imatinib resistance to sensitive tumours. Mechanistically, we showed that the ubiquitin‒proteasome system is involved in elevated Rab35 expression and that ubiquitin-specific protease 32 (USP32), a deubiquitylating enzyme, is bound to Rab35. Further experiments demonstrate that this protease protects Rab35 from proteasomal degradation by reducing Lys48 (K48)-ubiquitination. Additionally, we found that the transcription factor ETV1, which is a lineage survival factor in GISTs, promotes USP32 expression. Collectively, our results reveal that exosomes transmit imatinib resistance in GISTs and that deubiquitylation plays a key role in regulating the transmission process. The USP32-Rab35 axis provides a potential target for interventions to reduce the occurrence of imatinib resistance in GISTs.

TKI Treatment Sequencing in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Prior to the early 2000s, patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) had very poor prognoses owing to a lack of effective therapies. The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors at the turn of the century significantly improved the overall survival for patients with GIST. The resounding success of imatinib in the first clinical trial of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor to treat GIST led to its approval for first-line therapy for advanced GIST; this study was open to all comers and not restricted to any GIST subtype(s). The trials that led to the approvals of second-, third-, and fourth-line therapy for advanced GIST were also open to all patients with advanced/metastatic GIST. Only in retrospect do we realize the role that the molecular subtypes played in the results observed in these studies. In this review, we discuss the studies that led to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of imatinib (first line), sunitinib (second line), regorafenib (third line), and ripretinib (fourth line) for advanced KIT-mutant GIST. In addition, we review how information about GIST molecular subtypes has been used to accelerate the approval of other targeted therapies for non-KIT mutant GIST, leading to the approval of five additional drugs indicated for the treatment of specific GIST molecular subtypes. We also discuss how our understanding of the molecular subtypes will play a role in the next generation of therapeutic approaches for treating advanced GIST.

9.4 T static magnetic field ameliorates imatinib mesylate-induced toxicity and depression in mice

PURPOSE

9.4 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been initially tested on healthy human volunteers, but its future application will benefit more from experiments with animal disease models. In the meantime, high static magnetic fields (SMFs) have been shown to improve mice mental health and have anti-tumor potentials.

METHODS

We compared the anti-tumor effects of 9.4 T SMF with or without a commonly used chemotherapy drug imatinib mesylate on BALB/c (Nu/Nu) mice bearing gastrointestinal stromal tumor GIST-T1 cells. The body weight, food/water consumption, complete blood count, blood biochemistry, tumor weight, HE and Ki67 stains were examined. Locomotor activity and cognitive functions were also measured by four behavior tests, including open field, elevated plus maze, three-chamber and tail suspension tests.

RESULTS

We found that the tumor growth was inhibited up to 62.88% when treated with 9.4 T SMF alone for 200 h. More importantly, 9.4 T SMF combined with 20 mg/kg imatinib mesylate can result in 92.75% tumor suppression, which is close to the anti-tumor effect of high dose (80 mg/kg) imatinib. However, 80 mg/kg imatinib caused severe side effects, including significantly reduced gain of body weight, abnormal liver function and depressive behaviors in mice. In contrast, 9.4 T SMF treatment significantly reduced these side effects, especially for the depressive behaviors.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that 9.4 T SMF not only has anti-tumor effects on its own, but also could improve the anti-tumor effect of imatinib mesylate, reduce its toxicity and improve the mice mental health, which unraveled the great clinical potentials of high SMF in future applications.

A literature review and database of how the primary KIT/PDGFRA variant of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour predicts for sensitivity to imatinib

It is well recognized that the primary KIT or PDGFRA variant of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) can predict sensitivity to imatinib. However, these data are currently spread across a wide range of publications and have not been collated as one reference. A broad-ranging literature search was therefore performed to assemble such a database which should help optimize imatinib-based management of GIST patients henceforth. Having excluded wild type GISTs and results for imatinib used as adjuvant therapy, 79 publications (dated August 2001 to March 2022) underwent data extraction. These data on imatinib sensitivity were either derived from in vitro studies, predicted by in silico analysis or based on in vivo clinical patient response. Data interpretation carried some caveats: there was a potential for replication of patient-derived data between older and new publications; only predicted protein sequences were presented; the criteria used to record clinical response were not uniform across all publications; and imatinib dosage could vary between different clinical publications. However, these data showed broad agreement of imatinib sensitivity amongst similar subtypes of KIT or PDGFRA variant. There was also agreement between in vivo versus in vitro/in silico derived sensitivity data for most variants when both data types were available.

Agent-Based Models Help Interpret Patterns of Clinical Drug Resistance by Contextualizing Competition Between Distinct Drug Failure Modes

Introduction

Modern targeted cancer therapies are carefully crafted small molecules. These exquisite technologies exhibit an astonishing diversity of observed failure modes (drug resistance mechanisms) in the clinic. This diversity is surprising because back of the envelope calculations and classic modeling results in evolutionary dynamics suggest that the diversity in the modes of clinical drug resistance should be considerably smaller than what is observed. These same calculations suggest that the outgrowth of strong pre-existing genetic resistance mutations within a tumor should be ubiquitous. Yet, clinically relevant drug resistance occurs in the absence of obvious resistance conferring genetic alterations. Quantitatively, understanding the underlying biological mechanisms of failure mode diversity may improve the next generation of targeted anticancer therapies. It also provides insights into how intratumoral heterogeneity might shape interpatient diversity during clinical relapse.

Materials and Methods

We employed spatial agent-based models to explore regimes where spatial constraints enable wild type cells (that encounter beneficial microenvironments) to compete against genetically resistant subclones in the presence of therapy. In order to parameterize a model of microenvironmental resistance, BT20 cells were cultured in the presence and absence of fibroblasts from 16 different tissues. The degree of resistance conferred by cancer associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment was quantified by treating mono- and co-cultures with letrozole and then measuring the death rates.

Results and Discussion

Our simulations indicate that, even when a mutation is more drug resistant, its outgrowth can be delayed by abundant, low magnitude microenvironmental resistance across large regions of a tumor that lack genetic resistance. These observations hold for different modes of microenvironmental resistance, including juxtacrine signaling, soluble secreted factors, and remodeled ECM. This result helps to explain the remarkable diversity of resistance mechanisms observed in solid tumors, which subverts the presumption that the failure mode that causes the quantitatively fastest growth in the presence of drug should occur most often in the clinic.

Conclusion

Our model results demonstrate that spatial effects can interact with low magnitude of resistance microenvironmental effects to successfully compete against genetic resistance that is orders of magnitude larger. Clinical outcomes of solid tumors are intrinsically connected to their spatial structure, and the tractability of spatial agent-based models like the ones presented here enable us to understand this relationship more completely.

Advances in the research of the mechanism of secondary resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. At present, surgery is the first-line treatment for primary resectable GISTs; however, the recurrence rate is high. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is an effective first-line drug used for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs. More than 80% of patients with GISTs show significantly improved 5-year survival after treatment; however, approximately 50% of patients develop drug resistance after 2 years of IM treatment. Therefore, an in-depth research is urgently needed to reveal the mechanisms of secondary resistance to IM in patients with GISTs and to develop new therapeutic targets and regimens to improve their long-term prognoses. In this review, research on the mechanisms of secondary resistance to IM conducted in the last 5 years is discussed and summarized from the aspects of abnormal energy metabolism, gene mutations, non-coding RNA, and key proteins. Studies have shown that different drug-resistance mechanism networks are closely linked and interconnected. However, the influence of these drug-resistance mechanisms has not been compared. The combined inhibition of drug-resistance mechanisms with IM therapy and the combined inhibition of multiple drug-resistance mechanisms are expected to become new therapeutic options in the treatment of GISTs. In addition, implementing individualized therapies based on the identification of resistance mechanisms will provide new adjuvant treatment options for patients with IM-resistant GISTs, thereby delaying the progression of GISTs. Previous studies provide theoretical support for solving the problems of drug-resistance mechanisms. However, most studies on drug-resistance mechanisms are still in the research stage. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of the inhibition of drug-resistance mechanisms as a potential therapeutic target.

Ripretinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an overview of current evidence and drug approval

Over the past 20 years, the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has acted as an important model in the advancement of molecularly targeted therapies for solid tumors. The success of imatinib has established it as a lasting therapy in the management of early-stage and advanced disease in the first-line setting. Imatinib resistance inevitably develops, resulting in the need for further lines of therapy. Ripretinib is an orally administered switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor, specifically developed to target both primary and secondary KIT and PDGFRα resistance mutations. Herein, the authors discuss the molecular rationale, the preclinical evidence and the clinical use of ripretinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the advanced stages of disease.

Targeting the translational machinery in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a new therapeutic vulnerability

Although KIT-mutant GISTs can be effectively treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), many patients develop resistance to imatinib mesylate (IM) as well as the FDA-approved later-line agents sunitinib, regorafenib and ripretinib. Resistance mechanisms mainly involve secondary mutations in the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase gene indicating continued dependency on the KIT signaling pathway. The fact that the type of secondary mutation confers either sensitivity or resistance towards TKIs and the notion that secondary mutations exhibit intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity complicates the optimal choice of treatment in the imatinib-resistant setting. Therefore, new strategies that target KIT independently of its underlying mutations are urgently needed. Homoharringtonine (HHT) is a first-in-class inhibitor of protein biosynthesis and is FDA-approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) that is resistant to at least two TKIs. HHT has also shown activity in KIT-mutant mastocytosis models, which are intrinsically resistant to imatinib and most other TKIs. We hypothesized that HHT could be effective in GIST through downregulation of KIT expression and subsequent decrease of KIT activation and downstream signaling. Testing several GIST cell line models, HHT led to a significant reduction in nascent protein synthesis and was highly effective in the nanomolar range in IM-sensitive and IM-resistant GIST cell lines. HHT treatment resulted in a rapid and complete abolishment of KIT expression and activation, while KIT mRNA levels were minimally affected. The response to HHT involved induction of apoptosis as well as cell cycle arrest. The antitumor activity of HHT was confirmed in a GIST xenograft model. Taken together, inhibition of protein biosynthesis is a promising strategy to overcome TKI resistance in GIST.

A multicenter, dose-finding, phase 1b study of imatinib in combination with alpelisib as third-line treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Acquired resistance to approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors limits their clinical use in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). This study investigated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of alpelisib, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, used in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced GIST who had failed prior therapy with both imatinib and sunitinib.

METHODS

This phase 1b, multicenter, open-label study consisted of 2 phases: dose escalation and dose expansion. Dose escalation involved 200 mg once daily (QD) alpelisib, initially, followed by 250 and 350 mg. These were combined with 400 mg QD imatinib until maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of alpelisib in combination with imatinib was determined. This MTD/RP2D dose was tested to evaluate the clinical activity of this combination in dose expansion.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were enrolled, 21 and 35 in the dose escalation and expansion phases, respectively. The MTD of alpelisib given with imatinib was determined as 350 mg QD. Combination treatment showed partial response in 1 (2.9%) and stable disease in 15 (42.9%) patients. Median progression-free survival was 2 months (95% CI 1.8-4.6). Overall, 92.9% patients had adverse events (AEs) while 46.4% had grade 3/4 AEs, hyperglycemia being the most common (23.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of alpelisib was estimated as 350 mg QD when used in combination with imatinib 400 mg QD after oral administration in patients with advanced GIST. The safety and tolerability profile of this combination was acceptable; however, the combination did not demonstrate sufficient clinical activity to justify additional clinical testing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01735968 (date of initial registration 28/11/2012).

Health-Related Quality of Life and Side Effects in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), resulting in a substantial gain in median overall survival. Subsequently, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become more relevant. Here, we systematically review the available literature on HRQoL issues and side effects of different TKIs registered for the treatment of GIST.

METHODS

A search through five databases was performed. Full reports in English describing HRQoL outcomes and/or side effects in GIST patients on TKI therapy were included.

RESULTS

A total of 104 papers were included; 13 studies addressed HRQoL, and 96 studies investigated adverse events. HRQoL in patients treated with imatinib, regorafenib, and ripretinib remained stable, whereas most sunitinib-treated patients reported a decrease in HRQoL. Severe fatigue and fear of recurrence or progression were specifically assessed as HRQoL issues and had a negative impact on overall HRQoL as well as psychological and physical well-being. The majority of studies focused on physician-reported side effects. Nearly all GIST patients treated with a TKI experienced at least one adverse event, mostly mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that almost all patients treated with a TKI experienced side effects, this did not seem to affect overall HRQoL during TKI therapy. In daily practice, it are the side effects that hamper a patient's HRQoL resulting in treatment adjustments, suggesting that the reported side effects were underestimated by physicians, or the measures used to assess HRQoL do not capture all relevant issues that determine a GIST patient's HRQoL.

FGFR2::TACC2 fusion as a novel KIT-independent mechanism of targeted therapy failure in a multidrug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Genetic alterations in FGF/FGFR pathway are infrequent in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), with rare cases of quadruple wildtype GISTs harboring FGFR1 gene fusions and mutations. Additionally, FGF/FGFR overexpression was shown to promote drug resistance to kinase inhibitors in GISTs. However, FGFR gene fusions have not been directly implicated as a mechanism of drug resistance in GISTs. Herein, we report a patient presenting with a primary small bowel spindle cell GIST and concurrent peritoneal and liver metastases displaying an imatinib-sensitive KIT exon 11 in-frame deletion. After an initial 9-month benefit to imatinib, the patient experienced intraabdominal peritoneal recurrence owing to secondary KIT exon 13 missense mutation and FGFR4 amplification. Despite several additional rounds of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the patient's disease progressed after 2 years and presented with multiple peritoneal and liver metastases, including one pericolonic mass harboring secondary KIT exon 18 missense mutation, and a concurrent transverse colonic mass with a FGFR2::TACC2 fusion and AKT2 amplification. All tumors, including primary and recurrent masses, harbored an MGA c.7272 T > G (p.Y2424*) nonsense mutation and CDKN2A/CDKN2B/MTAP deletions. The transcolonic mass showed elevated mitotic count (18/10 HPF), as well as significant decrease in CD117 and DOG1 expression, in contrast to all the other resistant nodules that displayed diffuse and strong CD117 and DOG1 immunostaining. The FGFR2::TACC2 fusion resulted from a 742 kb intrachromosomal inversion at the chr10q26.3 locus, leading to a fusion between exons 1-17 of FGFR2 and exons 7-17 TACC2, which preserves the extracellular and protein tyrosine kinase domains of FGFR2. We present the first report of a multi-drug resistant GIST patient who developed an FGFR2 gene fusion as a secondary genetic event to the selective pressure of various TKIs. This case also highlights the heterogeneous escape mechanisms to targeted therapy across various tumor nodules, spanning from both KIT-dependent and KIT-independent off-target activation pathways.

Emerging Importance of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors against Cancer: Quo Vadis to Cure?

GLOBOCAN 2020 estimated more than 19.3 million new cases, and about 10 million patients were deceased from cancer in 2020. Clinical manifestations showed that several growth factor receptors consisting of transmembrane and cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase (TK) domains play a vital role in cancer progression. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are crucial intermediaries of the several cellular pathways and carcinogenesis that directly affect the prognosis and survival of higher tumor grade patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are efficacious drugs for targeted therapy of various cancers. Therefore, RTKs have become a promising therapeutic target to cure cancer. A recent report shows that TKIs are vital mediators of signal transduction and cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. In this review, we discuss the structure and function of RTKs to explore their prime role in cancer therapy. Various TKIs have been developed to date that contribute a lot to treating several types of cancer. These TKI based anticancer drug molecules are also discussed in detail, incorporating their therapeutic efficacy, mechanism of action, and side effects. Additionally, this article focuses on TKIs which are running in the clinical trial and pre-clinical studies. Further, to gain insight into the pathophysiological mechanism of TKIs, we also reviewed the impact of RTK resistance on TKI clinical drugs along with their mechanistic acquired resistance in different cancer types.

Proteasome Inhibition Suppresses KIT-Independent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Via Targeting Hippo/YAP/Cyclin D1 Signaling

Purpose: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin of the digestive tract. A yet more challenging resistance mechanism involves transition from oncogenic KIT to a new imatinib-insensitive oncogenic driver, heralded by loss of KIT expression. Our recent studies have shown that inhibition of cyclin D1 and Hippo signaling, which are overexpressed in KIT-independent GIST, is accompanied by anti-proliferative and apoptosis-promoting effects. PRKCQ, JUN, and the Hippo/YAP pathway coordinately regulate GIST cyclin D1 expression. Thus, targeting of these pathways could be effective therapeutically for these now untreatable tumors.

Methods: Targeting cyclin D1 expression of small molecular drugs was screened by a cell monolayer growth and western blotting. The biologic mechanisms of bortezomib to KIT-independent GISTs were assessed by immunoblotting, qRT-PCR, cell viability, colony growth, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis, migration and invasiveness.

Results: In the initial small molecular inhibitor screening in KIT-independent GIST62, we found that bortezomib-mediated inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery showed anti-proliferative effects of KIT-independent GIST cells via downregulation of cyclin D1 and induction of p53 and p21. Treatment with proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, led to downregulation of cyclin D1 and YAP/TAZ and an increase in the cleaved PARP expression in three KIT-independent GIST cell lines (GIST48B, GIST54, and GIST226). Additionally, it induced p53 and p21 expression in GIST48B and GIST54, increased apoptosis, and led to cell cycle G1/G2-phase arrest, decreased cell viability, colony formation, as well as migration and invasiveness in all GIST cell lines.

Conclusion: Although our findings are early proof-of-principle, there are signs of a potential effective treatment for KIT-independent GISTs, the data highlight that targeting of cyclin D1 and Hippo/YAP by bortezomib warrants evaluation as a novel therapeutic strategy in KIT-independent GISTs.

Resistance to Avapritinib in PDGFRA-Driven GIST Is Caused by Secondary Mutations in the PDGFRA Kinase Domain

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harboring activating mutations of PDGFRA respond to imatinib, with the notable exception of the most common mutation, D842V. Avapritinib is a novel, potent KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor with substantial clinical activity in patients with the D842V genotype. To date, only a minority of PDGFRA-mutant patients treated with avapritinib have developed secondary resistance. Tumor and plasma biopsies in 6 of 7 patients with PDGFRA primary mutations who progressed on avapritinib or imatinib had secondary resistance mutations within PDGFRA exons 13, 14, and 15 that interfere with avapritinib binding. Secondary PDGFRA mutations causing V658A, N659K, Y676C, and G680R substitutions were found in 2 or more patients each, representing recurrent mechanisms of PDGFRA GIST drug resistance. Notably, most PDGFRA-mutant GISTs refractory to avapritinib remain dependent on the PDGFRA oncogenic signal. Inhibitors that target PDGFRA protein stability or inhibition of PDGFRA-dependent signaling pathways may overcome avapritinib resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Here, we provide the first description of avapritinib resistance mechanisms in PDGFRA-mutant GIST.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

New insights into the clinical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

INTRODUCTION

90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor an activating mutation in the KIT or PDGFRα oncogene, and these are known to confer imatinib sensitivity.

AREAS COVERED

The author reviews the data regarding the current management of GIST, mechanisms of resistance to imatinib, and new drugs currently in clinical development and provides his unique perspectives on the subject matter.

EXPERT OPINION

Several studies have shown that the response to imatinib in GIST patients mainly depends on the mutational status of KIT or PDGFRα. Moreover, most, if not all, patients treated with imatinib for advanced GIST will develop a secondary progressive disease under the treatment. In most cases, such progressions are the result of acquired resistance due to the occurrence of secondary c-KIT mutations, especially in GISTs with primary exon 11 mutations. Sunitinib and regorafenib are inhibitors of multiple tyrosine kinases, including KIT, PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, and VEGFRs, and are approved for the management of imatinib- and imatinib/sunitinib-refractory GIST patients, respectively. Clearly, better knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance to imatinib as well as the development of a new class of broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as avapritinib and ripretinib will provide new individualized therapeutic strategies for GIST patients.

The V654A second-site KIT mutation increases tumor oncogenesis and STAT activation in a mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common human sarcoma and arises in the gastrointestinal tract. Most GISTs are caused by activating mutations in the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase, such as the exon 11 KIT V559Δ mutation. The small molecule imatinib inhibits KIT and has been a mainstay of therapy in GIST. Unfortunately, imatinib-treated patients typically relapse, most often due to clonal emergence of the resistance-associated KIT V654A mutation. To determine the biologic impact of this second-site mutation in vivo, we created a mouse model with the corresponding V558Δ;V653A Kit double mutation restricted (a) spatially to ETV1⁺ cells, which include the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) from which GISTs presumably originate, and (b) temporally through tamoxifen treatment after birth. This resulted in the first in vivo model of the most common second-site mutation associated with imatinib resistance in GIST and the first in vivo demonstration that cell-autonomous expression of mutant KIT in the ICC lineage leads to GIST. GISTs driven by the V558Δ;V653A Kit double mutation were resistant to imatinib, while cabozantinib was more effective in overcoming resistance than sunitinib. Compared to control mice with a single V558Δ Kit mutation, mice with a double V558Δ; V653A Kit mutation had increased tumor oncogenesis and associated KIT-dependent STAT activation. Our findings demonstrate that the biologic consequences of a second-site mutation in an oncogenic driver may include not only a mechanism for drug resistance, but changes in tumor oncogenic potential and differential activation of signaling pathways.

Non-Coding RNAs, a Novel Paradigm for the Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal malignancies found in the gastrointestinal tract. At a molecular level, most GISTs are characterized by gain-of-function mutations in V-Kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 Feline Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KIT) and Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA), leading to constitutive activated signaling through these receptor tyrosine kinases, which drive GIST pathogenesis. In addition to surgery, treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib forms the mainstay of GIST treatment, particularly in the advanced setting. Nevertheless, the majority of GISTs develop imatinib resistance. Biomarkers that indicate metastasis, drug resistance and disease progression early on could be of great clinical value. Likewise, novel treatment strategies that overcome resistance mechanisms are equally needed. Non-coding RNAs, particularly microRNAs, can be employed as diagnostic, prognostic or predictive biomarkers and have therapeutic potential. Here we review which non-coding RNAs are deregulated in GISTs, whether they can be linked to specific clinicopathological features and discuss how they can be used to improve the clinical management of GISTs.

A shift of dynamic equilibrium between the KIT active and inactive states causes drug resistance

Tyrosine phosphorylation, a highly regulated post-translational modification, is carried out by the enzyme tyrosine kinase (TK). TKs are important mediators in signaling cascades, facilitating diverse biological processes in response to stimuli. TKs may acquire mutations leading to malignancy and are viable targets for anti-cancer drugs. Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor KIT is a TK involved in cell differentiation, whose dysregulation leads to various types of cancer, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leukemia, and melanoma. KIT can be targeted by a range of inhibitors that predominantly bind to the inactive state of the enzyme. A mutation Y823D in the activation loop of KIT is known to be responsible for the loss of sensitivity to some drugs in metastatic tumors. We used all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to study the impact of Y823D on the KIT conformation and dynamics and compared it to the effect of phosphorylation of Y823. We simulated in total 6.4 μs of wild-type, mutant and phosphorylated KIT in the active- and inactive-state conformations. We found that Y823D affects the protein dynamics differently: in the active state, the mutation increases the protein stability, whereas in the inactive state it induces local destabilization, thus shifting the dynamic equilibrium towards the active state, altering the communication between distant regulatory regions. The observed dynamics of the Y823D mutant is similar to the dynamics of KIT phosphorylated at position Y823, thus we hypothesize that this mutation mimics a constitutively active kinase, which is not responsive to inhibitors that bind its inactive conformation.

Intrigue: Phase III study of ripretinib versus sunitinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after imatinib

Ripretinib (DCC-2618) is a novel, type II tyrosine switch control inhibitor designed to broadly inhibit activating and drug-resistant mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. Ripretinib has emerged as a promising investigational agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor owing to targeted inhibition of secondary resistance mutations that may develop following treatment with prior line(s) of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here we describe the rationale and design of intrigue (NCT03673501), a global, randomized (1:1), open-label, Phase III study comparing the safety and efficacy of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor following imatinib. The primary end point is progression-free survival and key secondary objectives include objective response rate and overall survival. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03673501.

Proteomic research in sarcomas - current status and future opportunities

Sarcomas are a rare group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 70 different histological subtypes. For the majority of these diseases, the molecular understanding of the basis of their initiation and progression remains unclear. As such, limited clinical progress in prognosis or therapeutic regimens have been made over the past few decades. Proteomics techniques are being increasingly utilised in the field of sarcoma research. Proteomic research efforts have thus far focused on histological subtype characterisation for the improvement of biological understanding, as well as for the identification of candidate diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers for use in clinic. However, the field itself is in its infancy, and none of these proteomic research findings have been translated into the clinic. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the proteomic strategies that have been employed in sarcoma research. We evaluate key proteomic studies concerning several rare and ultra-rare sarcoma subtypes including, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, osteosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumours, Ewing sarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, and alveolar soft part sarcoma. Consequently, we illustrate how routine implementation of proteomics within sarcoma research, integration of proteomics with other molecular profiling data, and incorporation of proteomics into clinical trial studies has the potential to propel the biological and clinical understanding of this group of complex rare cancers moving forward.

Case report of rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation of a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. Mutations of KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha have been well characterized in GISTs. Patients with KIT mutations are generally sensitive to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, some patients with GIST, while initially sensitive to TKIs, gain resistance in later stages of treatment. Heterologous rhabdomyomsarcomatous dedifferentiation of advanced GISTs after long-term imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy has been reported. In these cases, the underlying molecular mechanism of tumor progression and transformation is unclear.

Case presentation

We report one such patient with rhabdomyosarcomatous dedifferentiation of a GIST without metastatic disease after brief 3-month therapy with IM. The tumor was composed of two distinct phenotypes, a CD117 negative region with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation directly adjacent to a CD117 positive classic GIST region. Molecular analysis identified the activating KIT exon 11 mutation in both regions, indicating a common origin for both phenotypes. Additionally, the dedifferentiated component contained two synonymous variants in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and KIT. The increased number of synonymous variants in the rhabdomyosarcomatous region may reflect increased genetic instability of this tumor that may have resulted in the loss of CD117 expression in the dedifferentiated component.

Conclusion

This study adds to the growing consensus that rhabdomyosarcomatous GIST progresses from a common GIST primary tumor. The role of IM in this progression is uncertain; however short duration of IM treatment in this study supports the hypothesis that rhabdomyosarcomatous GIST progression is not a consequence of IM therapy. Furthermore, we provide additional information supporting the observation that CD117 negative rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation maintains the activating KIT variant without KIT expression.

Cyclin D1 is a mediator of gastrointestinal stromal tumor KIT-independence

Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA tyrosine kinase mutations are compelling therapeutic targets in most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and the KIT inhibitor, imatinib, is therefore standard of care for patients with metastatic GIST. However, some GISTs lose expression of KIT oncoproteins, and therefore become KIT-independent and are consequently resistant to KIT-inhibitor drugs. We identified distinctive biologic features in KIT-independent, imatinib-resistant GISTs as a step towards identifying drug targets in these poorly understood tumors. We developed isogenic GIST lines in which the parental forms were KIT oncoprotein-dependent, whereas sublines had loss of KIT oncoprotein expression, accompanied by markedly downregulated expression of the GIST biomarker, protein kinase C-theta (PRKCQ). Biologic mechanisms unique to KIT-independent GISTs were identified by transcriptome sequencing, qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, protein interaction studies, knockdown and expression assays, and dual-luciferase assays. Transcriptome sequencing showed that cyclin D1 expression was extremely low in two of three parental KIT-dependent GIST lines, whereas cyclin D1 expression was high in each of the KIT-independent GIST sublines. Cyclin D1 inhibition in KIT-independent GISTs had anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects, associated with Rb activation and p27 upregulation. PRKCQ, but not KIT, was a negative regulator of cyclin D1 expression, whereas JUN and Hippo pathway effectors YAP and TAZ were positive regulators of cyclin D1 expression. PRKCQ, JUN, and the Hippo pathway coordinately regulate GIST cyclin D1 expression. These findings highlight the roles of PRKCQ, JUN, Hippo, and cyclin D1 as oncogenic mediators in GISTs that have converted, during TKI-therapy, to a KIT-independent state. Inhibitors of these pathways could be effective therapeutically for these now untreatable tumors.

Novel approaches to treating advanced systemic mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by expansion of abnormal mast cells (MCs) in various tissues, including skin, bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract, liver, spleen, or lymph nodes. Subtypes include indolent systemic mastocytosis, smoldering systemic mastocytosis and advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM), a term collectively used for the three most aggressive forms of the disease: aggressive systemic mastocytosis, mast cell leukemia, and systemic mastocytosis with an associated clonal hematological non-mast cell disease (SM-AHNMD). MC activation and proliferation is physiologically controlled in part through stem cell factor (SCF) binding to its cognate receptor, KIT. Gain-of-function KIT mutations that lead to ligand-independent kinase activation are found in most SM subtypes, and the overwhelming majority of AdvSM patients harbor the KIT^D816V mutation. Several approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib and nilotinib, have activity against wild-type KIT but lack activity against KIT^D816V. Midostaurin, a broad spectrum TKI with activity against KIT^D816V, has a 60% clinical response rate, and is currently the only drug specifically approved for AdvSM. While this agent improves the prognosis of AdvSM patients and provides proof of principle for targeting KIT^D816V as a driver mutation, most responses are partial and/or not sustained, indicating that more potent and/or specific inhibitors are required. Avapritinib, a KIT and PDGFRα inhibitor, was specifically designed to inhibit KIT^D816V. Early results from a Phase 1 trial suggest that avapritinib has potent antineoplastic activity in AdvSM, extending to patients who failed midostaurin. Patients exhibited a rapid reduction in both symptoms as well as reductions of bone marrow MCs, serum tryptase, and KIT^D816V mutant allele burden. Adverse effects include expected toxicities such as myelosuppression and periorbital edema, but also cognitive impairment in some patients. Although considerable excitement about avapritinib exists, more data are needed to assess long-term responses and adverse effects of this novel TKI.

ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Midostaurin and Avapritinib Have Distinct Resistance Profiles in Exon 17-Mutant KIT

KIT is a type-3 receptor tyrosine kinase that is frequently mutated at exon 11 or 17 in a variety of cancers. First-generation KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are ineffective against KIT exon 17 mutations, which favor an active conformation that prevents these TKIs from binding. The ATP-competitive inhibitors, midostaurin and avapritinib, which target the active kinase conformation, were developed to inhibit exon 17-mutant KIT. Because secondary kinase domain mutations are a common mechanism of TKI resistance and guide ensuing TKI design, we sought to define problematic KIT kinase domain mutations for these emerging therapeutics. Midostaurin and avapritinib displayed different vulnerabilities to secondary kinase domain substitutions, with the T670I gatekeeper mutation being selectively problematic for avapritinib. Although gatekeeper mutations often directly disrupt inhibitor binding, we provide evidence that T670I confers avapritinib resistance indirectly by inducing distant conformational changes in the phosphate-binding loop. These findings suggest combining midostaurin and avapritinib may forestall acquired resistance mediated by secondary kinase domain mutations. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies potential problematic kinase domain mutations for next-generation KIT inhibitors midostaurin and avapritinib.

Molecular Comparison of Imatinib-Naïve and Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Differentially Expressed microRNAs and mRNAs

Despite the success of imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients, 50% of the patients experience resistance within two years of treatment underscoring the need to get better insight into the mechanisms conferring imatinib resistance. Here the microRNA and mRNA expression profiles in primary (imatinib-naïve) and imatinib-resistant GIST were examined. Fifty-three GIST samples harboring primary KIT mutations (exon 9; n = 11/exon 11; n = 41/exon 17; n = 1) and comprising imatinib-naïve (IM-n) (n = 33) and imatinib-resistant (IM-r) (n = 20) tumors, were analyzed. The microRNA expression profiles were determined and from a subset (IM-n, n = 14; IM-r, n = 15) the mRNA expression profile was established. Ingenuity pathway analyses were used to unravel biochemical pathways and gene networks in IM-r GIST. Thirty-five differentially expressed miRNAs between IM-n and IM-r GIST samples were identified. Additionally, miRNAs distinguished IM-r samples with and without secondary KIT mutations. Furthermore 352 aberrantly expressed genes were found in IM-r samples. Pathway and network analyses revealed an association of differentially expressed genes with cell cycle progression and cellular proliferation, thereby implicating genes and pathways involved in imatinib resistance in GIST. Differentially expressed miRNAs and mRNAs between IM-n and IM-r GIST were identified. Bioinformatic analyses provided insight into the genes and biochemical pathways involved in imatinib-resistance and highlighted key genes that may be putative treatment targets.

Relationship between efficacy of sunitinib and KIT mutation of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

A large number of studies have shown that KIT mutations are closely related to the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). At the same time, sunitinib (SU) has become the second-line recommended drug for GISTs because of its efficacy. We initiated a systematic review to compare the efficacy of SU after failure of Imatinib (IM) in different KIT mutations.

METHODS

We searched for SU-treated patients with advanced GISTs after failed IM treatment by using databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, up to March 2018. We conducted statistical analyses to calculate the odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) using fixed-effects and random-effects models by Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

We included a total of 474 patients from 3 retrospective studies and 2 cohort studies. Patients with exon 9 mutations had higher clinical benefit (OR = 2.61, 95% CIs = 1.32-5.18, P = .006) rates and longer progression-free survival (progressive disease, HR = 0.51, 95% CIs = 0.36-0.72, P = .0001) compared with exon 11, but there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS, HR = 0.93, 95% CIs = 0.34-2.55, P = .89) and there was greater heterogeneity (Tau = 0.72, Chi = 21.45, df = 3, P < .001, I = 86%). Subgroup analysis suggests that race may be one of the sources of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The results show that efficacy of SU is closely associated with KIT genotypes in GISTs. Moreover, racial factor also directly affects the prognosis of different KIT mutational status, so GISTs patients of different genotypes might also consider the use of targeted drugs in consideration of ethnic differences.

Complementary activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors against secondary kit mutations in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Most patients with KIT-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) benefit from imatinib, but treatment resistance results from outgrowth of heterogeneous subclones with KIT secondary mutations. Once resistance emerges, targeting KIT with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and regorafenib provides clinical benefit, albeit of limited duration.

METHODS

We systematically explored GIST resistance mechanisms to KIT-inhibitor TKIs that are either approved or under investigation in clinical trials: the studies draw upon GIST models and clinical trial correlative science. We subsequently modelled in vitro a rapid TKI alternation approach against subclonal heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Each of the KIT-inhibitor TKIs targets effectively only a subset of KIT secondary mutations in GIST. Regorafenib and sunitinib have complementary activity in that regorafenib primarily inhibits imatinib-resistance mutations in the activation loop, whereas sunitinib inhibits imatinib-resistance mutations in the ATP-binding pocket. We find that rapid alternation of sunitinib and regorafenib suppresses growth of polyclonal imatinib-resistant GIST more effectively than either agent as monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data highlight that heterogeneity of KIT secondary mutations is the main mechanism of tumour progression to KIT inhibitors in imatinib-resistant GIST patients. Therapeutic combinations of TKIs with complementary activity against resistant mutations may be useful to suppress growth of polyclonal imatinib-resistance in GIST.

The Clonal Evolution of Metastatic Osteosarcoma as Shaped by Cisplatin Treatment

To investigate the genomic evolution of metastatic pediatric osteosarcoma, we performed whole-genome and targeted deep sequencing on 14 osteosarcoma metastases and two primary tumors from four patients (two to eight samples per patient). All four patients harbored ancestral (truncal) somatic variants resulting in TP53 inactivation and cell-cycle aberrations, followed by divergence into relapse-specific lineages exhibiting a cisplatin-induced mutation signature. In three of the four patients, the cisplatin signature accounted for >40% of mutations detected in the metastatic samples. Mutations potentially acquired during cisplatin treatment included NF1 missense mutations of uncertain significance in two patients and a KIT G565R activating mutation in one patient. Three of four patients demonstrated widespread ploidy differences between samples from the sample patient. Single-cell seeding of metastasis was detected in most metastatic samples. Cross-seeding between metastatic sites was observed in one patient, whereas in another patient a minor clone from the primary tumor seeded both metastases analyzed. These results reveal extensive clonal heterogeneity in metastatic osteosarcoma, much of which is likely cisplatin-induced. IMPLICATIONS: The extent and consequences of chemotherapy-induced damage in pediatric cancers is unknown. We found that cisplatin treatment can potentially double the mutational burden in osteosarcoma, which has implications for optimizing therapy for recurrent, chemotherapy-resistant disease.

Activated tyrosine kinases in gastrointestinal stromal tumor with loss of KIT oncoprotein expression

Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) mutations are compelling therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and the KIT/PDGFRA kinase inhibitor, imatinib, is the standard of care for patients with metastatic GIST. However, approximately 10% of KIT-positive GIST metastases lose KIT expression at the time of clinical progression during imatinib therapy. In the present report, we performed TK-activation screens, using phosphotyrosine-TK double immunoaffinity purification and mass spectrometry, in GIST in vitro models lacking KIT expression. These studies demonstrated tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR, AXL, and EPHA2 in four of six KIT-negative GIST lines (GIST62, GIST522, GIST54, GIST226, GIST48B, and GIST430B), and tyrosine-phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in each of the six KIT-negative lines. AXL expression was strong in KIT-negative or -weak clinical GIST samples that were obtained from progressing metastases during imatinib therapy. AXL knockdown inhibited viability in three KIT-negative GIST cell lines (GIST62, GIST54, and GIST522), but not in an AXL-negative, KIT-positive GIST control cell line (GIST430). AXL inhibition by R428, a specific AXL kinase inhibitor, reduced viability in AXL-activated GIST54. AXL knockdown in GIST62, GIST522, and GIST54 was accompanied by an increase in p21, p27, and p53 expression. By contrast, gefitinib-mediated EGFR inhibition, PF562271-mediated FAK inactivation, and shRNA-mediated knockdowns of EPHA2 and FAK had no effect on viability or colony formation of the KIT-negative GISTs. These findings highlight the potential relevance of AXL/p53 signaling as a therapeutic target in a subset of GISTs that have lost KIT oncoprotein expression.