Biology and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis

An efficient computational framework for gastrointestinal disorder prediction using attention-based transfer learning

Diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, which affect parts of the digestive system such as the stomach and intestines, can be difficult even for experienced gastroenterologists due to the variety of ways these conditions present. Early diagnosis is critical for successful treatment, but the review process is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) methods provide a solution by automating diagnosis, saving time, reducing workload, and lowering the likelihood of missing critical signs. In recent years, machine learning and deep learning approaches have been used to develop many CAD systems to address this issue. However, existing systems need to be improved for better safety and reliability on larger datasets before they can be used in medical diagnostics. In our study, we developed an effective CAD system for classifying eight types of GI images by combining transfer learning with an attention mechanism. Our experimental results show that ConvNeXt is an effective pre-trained network for feature extraction, and ConvNeXt+Attention (our proposed method) is a robust CAD system that outperforms other cutting-edge approaches. Our proposed method had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9997 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.9973, indicating excellent performance. The conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the system was also supported by the values of other evaluation metrics.

Causality of Helicobacter pylori infection on eosinophilic esophagitis and potential pathogenesis: a Mendelian randomization study

Background

Observational studies have indicated a possible connection between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but their causal relationship has yet to be established. To investigate the causal associations between H. pylori infection and EoE, we performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

Methods

Firstly, we conducted both univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Furthermore, a two-step MR was carried out to ascertain the potential underlying pathways of these associations, particularly the involvement of inflammatory cytokines. We employed the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as the main analysis in our MR study. To enhance the credibility of the results, we also conducted several sensitivity analyses.

Results

Our study demonstrated a noteworthy correlation between genetically predicted anti-H. pylori IgG antibody levels and a reduced risk of EoE (OR=0.325, 95% CI=0.165-0.643, P value=0.004, adj p value=0.009). No significant causal associations were detected between other H. pylori antibodies and EoE in our study. When it comes to multivariable MR analysis controlling for education attainment, household income, and deprivation individually, the independent causal impact of anti-H. pylori IgG on EoE persisted. Surprisingly, the two-step MR analysis indicated that inflammatory factors (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, and IFN-γ) did not appear to mediate the protective effect of H. pylori infection against EoE.

Conclusion

Findings suggested that among the range of H. pylori-related antibodies, anti-H. pylori IgG antibody is the sole causal factor associated with protection against EoE. Certain inflammatory factors may not be involved in mediating this association. These findings make a significant contribution to advancing our understanding of the pathogenesis of EoE and its evolving etiology.

Causal relationship between eosinophilic esophagitis and inflammatory bowel disease: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are immune-mediated gastrointestinal diseases with overlapped pathogenesis and are sometimes concurrently diagnosed, but their causal relationship remains unclear. We investigated the causal relationship between EoE and IBD and its subtypes via a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

Methods

MR analyses were performed using summary data of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on individuals of European ancestry. Independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms correlated with EoE (from a GWAS meta-analysis containing 1,930 cases and 13,634 controls) and IBD (from FinnGen GWASs containing 9,083 IBD, 2,033 CD, and 5,931 UC cases, and GWASs of IBD genetic consortium containing 12,882 IBD, 6,968 UC, and 5,956 CD cases) were selected as instruments. We applied the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary analysis followed by several sensitivity analyses. For the forward MR study, estimates from IVW methods were subsequently meta-analyzed using a random-effect model.

Results

Our results suggested a causal effect of EoE on IBD [pooled odds ratio (OR), 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.13] and EoE on UC (pooled OR, 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.14). No causal link between EoE and CD was observed (pooled OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.16). The reverse MR analyses revealed no causal effect of IBD (and its subtypes) on EoE. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of primary results.

Conclusions

Our findings provided evidence of a suggestive causal effect of EoE on IBD (specifically on UC) in the European population. Increased awareness of concurrent or subsequent IBD in patients with EoE is called for. Still, the present evidence is not adequate enough and ought to be validated by further investigations.

A Comprehensive Global Population-Based Analysis on the Coexistence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

We explored inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) coexistence using a global dataset. Investigating their epidemiology, risks, and impact, we aimed to enhance the understanding of concurrent diagnoses and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using deidentified patient data from the TriNetX database (2011-2022). We estimated the incidence and prevalence of EoE in patients with IBD, including both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and vice versa. Risks of select immune-mediated conditions and disease complications were compared among patients with EoE, IBD, or concurrent diagnoses.

RESULTS

Our results included 174,755 patients with CD; 150,774 patients with UC; and 44,714 patients with EoE. The risk of EoE was significantly higher among patients with CD (prevalence ratio [PR] 11.2) or UC (PR 8.7) compared with individuals without IBD. The risk of IBD was higher in patients with EoE (CD: PR 11.6; UC: PR 9.1) versus those without EoE. A propensity-matched analysis of IBD patients revealed that, when comparing patients with and without EoE, the relative risk of immune-mediated comorbidities was significantly greater for celiac disease, IBD-related inflammatory conditions, eczema and asthma (CD: n = 1896; UC: n = 1231; p < 0.001). Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of EoE and IBD had a higher composite risk of IBD-related complications (CD: adjusted HR (aHR) 1.14, p < 0.005; UC: aHR 1.17, p < 0.01) and lower risk of food bolus impaction (aHR 0.445, p = 0.0011).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous EoE and IBD increased IBD-related complications risk, needing more treatment (glucocorticoids, biologic therapy, abdominal surgery), while reducing EoE-related issues like food bolus impaction.

Fibrous Remodeling in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Facts and Pathophysiological Uncertainties

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, progressive, type 2 inflammatory disease with increasing global prevalence. An eosinophil-predominant inflammation that permeates the epithelium and deeper esophageal layers characterizes the disease. Several cytokines, mainly derived from inflammatory T-helper 2 (Th2) cells and epithelial cells, are involved in perpetuating inflammatory responses by increasing surface permeability and promoting tissue remodeling characterized by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and collagen deposition. This leads to esophageal strictures and narrow caliber esophagi, which are proportional a patient's age and untreated disease length. Pathophysiological mechanisms leading to EoE have been described in recent years, and transforming growth factor beta (TGF)-beta have been involved in fibrotic phenomena in EoE. However, evidence on the dependence of these phenomena on TGF-beta is scarce and contradictory. This review provides state-of-the art knowledge on intimate mechanisms of esophageal fibrosis in EoE and its clinical consequences.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an atopic disease in which eosinophils infiltrate the esophageal mucosa and may result in a variety of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Chief among these are dysphagia, heartburn, and food bolus obstruction in adults whereas children often present with abdominal pain or vomiting. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic condition that if not detected and left untreated could lead to the development of subepithelial fibrosis and esophageal stenosis. The diagnosis of EoE is confirmed in a patient presenting with characteristic EoE symptoms, classic signs on endoscopy, and biopsy results showing >15 eosinophils/hpf. A number of useful treatments against EoE are currently available with new therapeutics on the horizon. The former include PPIs, topical steroids, and elimination diet; the latter comprise novel biologics including the monoclonal antibody dupilumab. All these treatments can improve symptoms and reduce esophageal eosinophil count. This brief introductory review describes the detection, diagnosis, and management of EoE.

Histologically Remarkable Eosinophilic Esophagitis Responsive to Dupilumab in a Gastrostomy Tube-Dependent Pediatric Patient on Amino Acid Formula

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), an eosinophil predominant, TH2-mediated condition increasing in prevalence in pediatric and adult populations, is typically treated with dietary manipulations to avoid triggering antigens. However, identifying specific dietary causes remains a persistent challenge, and restrictive diets are burdensome. Total dietary modification using amino acid-based formula does not always produce symptomatic or histologic resolution, suggesting that exposure to ingested aeroallergens drives their disease. EoE patients demonstrate symptomatic exacerbation from July to September correlating with higher grass and ragweed pollen counts. We present a 7-year-old tracheostomy- and gastrostomy-dependent girl who was found on surveillance endoscopy to have profound eosinophilic infiltration throughout the esophagus with inflammatory changes including basal cell hyperplasia on histology. She responded partially to topical corticosteroid therapy with fluticasone and had complete resolution of esophageal eosinophilic infiltrate with subcutaneous dupilumab.

Eosinophilic esophagitis auxiliary diagnosis based on a peptide ligand to eosinophil cationic protein in esophageal mucus of pediatric patients

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus characterized by increased number of eosinophils. Currently, EoE diagnosis is based on endoscopic procedures for histopathological examination, eosinophils' counting and, often, in clinical practice, the challenge is the differentiation between EoE and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to develop novel peptide ligand to Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) present in EoE biopsies of patients with potential to be used for detection. We performed a comparative proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of esophageal biopsies from pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease and control individuals. Then, phage display technology was used to select peptides against specific up-regulated protein from EoE patients. Twelve phage clones were selected after three biopanning rounds, and the best phage clone reactivity was evaluated by phage-ELISA assay using esophageal mucus samples from 94 pediatric patients. Mass spectrometry showed that eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was one of the most up-regulated proteins in EoE patients, which is an eosinophil granule protein usually deposited on tissues to mediate remodeling, but in excess may cause fibrosis and hypertrophy, especially in allergic responses. A highly reactive ECP-ligand peptide (E5) was able to distinguish reactive mucus of EoE patients from GERD and the control individuals by Phage-ELISA, achieving a sensitivity of 84.62%, and a specificity of 82.72%. This is the first study that successfully demonstrated an antibody-like peptide targeting ECP at the esophagus mucus as a useful auxilliary tool for EoE diagnosis with a significant association with atopic disorders and dysphagia.ClinicalTrials.gov no.: NCT03069573.

The Role of Heparan Sulfate in CCL26-Induced Eosinophil Chemotaxis

Proinflammatory chemokine ligand 26 (CCL26, eotaxin-3) mediates transendothelial cell migration of eosinophils by binding and activating the G-protein-coupled (GPC) chemokine receptor 3 on the surface of eosinophilic cells. Here we have investigated the role of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) as potential co-receptors in the process of CCL26-induced eosinophil chemotaxis. For this purpose, we have first identified the GAG-binding site of CCL26 by a site-directed mutagenesis approach in the form of an alanine screening. A panel of GAG-binding-deficient mutants has been designed, generated, and analyzed with respect to their binding affinities to heparan sulphate (HS) by isothermal fluorescence titration studies. This showed that basic amino acids in the α-helical part of CCL26 are strongly involved in GAG-binding. In chemotaxis experiments, we found that decreased GAG-binding affinity correlated with decreased chemotactic activity, which indicates an involvement of GAGs in eosinophil migration. This was further proven by the negative impact of heparinase III treatment and, independently, by the incubation of eosinophils with an anti heparan sulfate antibody. We finally investigated eosinophils’ proteoglycan (PG) expression patterns by real-time PCR, which revealed the highest expression level for serglycin. Including an anti-serglycin antibody in CCL26-induced eosinophil migration experiments reduced the chemotaxis of these immune cells, thereby proving the dependence of eosinophil mobilization on the proteoglycan serglycin.

The Efficacy of Cancer Immunotherapies Is Compromised by Helicobacter pylori Infection

Helicobacter pylori infects the gastric mucosa of a large number of humans. Although asymptomatic in the vast majority of cases, H pylori infection can lead to the development of peptic ulcers gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Using a variety of mechanisms, H pylori locally suppresses the function of the host immune system to establish chronic infection. Systemic immunomodulation has been observed in both clinical and pre-clinical studies, which have demonstrated that H pylori infection is associated with reduced incidence of inflammatory diseases, such as asthma and Crohn’s disease. The introduction of immunotherapies in the arsenal of anti-cancer drugs has revealed a new facet of H pylori-induced immune suppression. In this review, we will describe the intimate interactions between H pylori and its host, and formulate hypothtyeses describing the detrimental impact of H pylori infection on the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies.

Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis is Associated With Low Baseline Impedance

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that requires repeat endoscopic evaluation(s) to assess response to treatment. This results in high health care costs and a procedural burden in affected children. Noninvasive alternate modalities to reassess disease activity have not been established. Low baseline impedance measured by multichannel pH impedance (pH-MII) is seen in adults with EoE, in keeping with poor mucosal integrity. We aimed to investigate the relationship between esophageal eosinophilia (or severity of eosinophilic infiltration) and baseline impedance in children with EoE.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 15 children diagnosed with EoE at our institution who had undergone pH-MII within 30 days of 3-level esophageal biopsy. This group were not concurrently prescribed proton pump inhibitors and had negligible reflux parameters on pH-MII. Average impedance baseline was calculated upper, mid, and lower esophageal segments via baseline impedance automated analysis (RIAA) and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) methods. Eosinophil count data for upper, mid, and lower esophageal segments in the EoE group was collated.

RESULTS

A significantly lower baseline impedance was seen across the esophageal length in children with EoE, compared with 30 controls who had no differences in age or reflux burden on nonparametric testing. A relationship between baseline impedance and eosinophil number at corresponding esophageal segments was not established.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline impedance may be an important, less invasive adjunct in clinical practice to monitor treatment response in children with EoE. Larger prospective cohort studies should delineate optimally predictive baseline impedance thresholds for active and inactive disease.

Butyrate and propionate restore interleukin 13-compromised esophageal epithelial barrier function

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a food allergen driven disease that is accompanied by interleukin (IL) 13 overexpression and esophageal barrier dysfunction allowing transepithelial food allergen permeation. Nutraceuticals, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that restore barrier function and increase immune fitness may be a promising tool in the management of EoE. Here, we investigated the effects of the SCFAs acetate, propionate, and butyrate on an IL-13-compromised human esophageal epithelial barrier, including the mechanisms involved.

METHODS

An air-liquid interface culture model of differentiated human EPC2-hTERT (EPC2) was used to study whether SCFAs could restore barrier function after IL-13-induced impairment. Esophageal epithelial barrier function was monitored by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and FITC-dextran paracellular flux, and was further examined by qPCR and immunohistochemical analysis. G protein-coupled receptor (GPR) GPR41, GPR43, GPR109a, or histone deacetylase (HDAC) (ant)agonists were used to assess mechanisms of action of SCFAs.

RESULTS

IL-13 stimulation decreased TEER and increased FITC flux, which was counteracted by butyrate and propionate, but not acetate treatment. Barrier proteins FLG and DSG1 mRNA expression was upregulated following butyrate and propionate treatment, whereas expression of eosinophil chemoattractant CCL26 and protease CAPN14 was downregulated. Similarly, butyrate and propionate restored FLG and DSG1 protein expression. Similar effects were observed with an HDAC antagonist but not with GPR agonists.

CONCLUSION

Nutraceuticals butyrate and propionate restore the barrier function of esophageal epithelial cells after an inflammatory insult and may be of therapeutic benefit in the management of EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in children: Updates and practical aspects of management for allergists in a non-tertiary care private practice setup

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune and/or antigen-mediated disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of mucosa (≥15 eosinophils per high power field) without any secondary etiology. Non-immunoglobulin E mediated mechanisms predominate in EoE. Objective: This review concentrated on a stepwise approach for the allergist working in non-tertiary care private practice. Methods: A medical literature search that focused on several areas of the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of EoE was conducted. Results: There has been a steady increase in the prevalence and incidence of EoE. Clinical symptoms can vary from dysphagia to failure to thrive, depending on the age at presentation; some children develop adaptive behaviors to compensate for dysphagia, such as food preferences and slow eating. The diagnosis is based on a high index of clinical suspicion and is confirmed with endoscopy with biopsies after ruling out other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. Treatment options may include dietary therapy, pharmacologic therapies, or combination therapy. Therapeutic options may also include endoscopic dilation for stricturing disease. Conclusion: Providers should be aware of recent recommendation changes in the diagnostic workup, the role of skin-prick testing, and role of the proton-pump inhibitor as first-line therapy for EoE. Also, clinicians should be aware of the emerging role of empiric dietary therapy as a preferable therapeutic option when compared with the testing-directed diet and the elemental diet. Furthermore, topical glucocorticoid therapies are available, and new developing therapies are being investigated. Reevaluation of esophageal mucosa with biopsies is required approximately 2 months after therapy for a response and after a change in therapies to confirm continued resolution.

Eosinophilic esophagitis and asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia display similar immunohistological profiles

Patients with asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) do not exhibit clinical symptoms because of esophageal dysfunction, although they have endoscopic and histological findings similar to those of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The cause of the symptoms and the differences between aEE and EoE are unclear. The aim of this study is to determine whether aEE and EoE are same disease entities by comparing immune-related tissue biomarkers using immunohistological staining. Esophageal biopsy specimens from 61 patients, including 18 with aEE and 43 with EoE, were analyzed. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to quantify the immune-related tissue biomarkers such as major basic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, eotaxin-3, and immunoglobulin G4. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). There were no significant differences in clinical, endoscopic, or histological features, between patients with aEE and EoE, with the exception of body mass index. There were no significant differences in all immune-related tissue biomarkers between both groups. In conclusions, EoE and aEE displayed similar immunohistological profiles. Hence, they may be similar disease entities with some common pathogenic mechanisms. Our findings suggest that patients with aEE also have histopathological esophageal inflammation.

Advances in Food Allergy Treatment

Food allergies represent life-threatening diseases which are increasing in prevalence with no definitive treatments currently in place. Current treatments are no more than preventative avoidance and symptom management. Research within the field has focused on therapeutic developments to modify the immune response in allergen-specific and non-specific methods. This review of the advances made in treatments intends to cover methods such as oral immunotherapy, modified food protein vaccines as well as the use of alternative medicine. Thus, this review aims to inform and further extend discussion surrounding the potential clinical applications as well as novel routes for further research into an, as of yet, unsolved question.

Cow's Milk Protein Allergy in Term and Preterm Infants: Clinical Manifestations, Immunologic Pathophysiology, and Management Strategies

Cow's milk allergy is a common food allergy among infants. Symptoms of cow's milk allergy are wide-ranging and depend on the mechanism involved. There are immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and mixed mechanisms of food allergy. Symptoms of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy may be mild or may progress to anaphylaxis, which can be life-threatening. Non-IgE-mediated allergy includes food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, food protein-induced enteropathy, and Heiner syndrome (pulmonary hemosiderosis). These diagnoses comprise about half of all cow's milk allergies. The most common manifestation of cow's milk allergy in infants is FPIAP. FPIAP is commonly seen in healthy, full-term infants who present with rectal bleeding and are otherwise well-appearing. This can occur in both formula-fed and exclusively breastfed infants. Food proteins secreted in maternal breast milk can contribute to the development of these symptoms. Maternal cow's milk elimination diet is often successful in helping resolve symptoms. A period of reintroduction of cow's milk resulting in re-emergence of symptoms in stable asymptomatic infants is an excellent diagnostic tool to confirm a cow's milk allergy. Preterm infants are susceptible to food allergy, as demonstrated from several case reports of necrotizing enterocolitis-like illnesses that responded clinically to cow's milk elimination. Further study is needed about food allergy in the preterm infant population.

Eosinophils in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: The Road to Fibrostenosis is Paved With Good Intentions

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an antigen-driven disease associated with epithelial barrier dysfunction and chronic type 2 inflammation. Eosinophils are the defining feature of EoE histopathology but relatively little is known about their role in disease onset and progression. Classically defined as destructive, end-stage effector cells, eosinophils (a resident leukocyte in most of the GI tract) are increasingly understood to play roles in local immunity, tissue homeostasis, remodeling, and repair. Indeed, asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia is observed in IgE-mediated food allergy. Interestingly, EoE is a potential complication of oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy. However, we recently found that patients with peanut allergy may have asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia at baseline and that peanut OIT induces transient esophageal eosinophilia in most subjects. This is seemingly at odds with multiple studies which have shown that EoE disease severity correlates with tissue eosinophilia. Herein, we review the potential role of eosinophils in EoE at different stages of disease pathogenesis. Based on current literature we suggest the following: (1) eosinophils are recruited to the esophagus as a homeostatic response to epithelial barrier disruption; (2) eosinophils mediate barrier-protective activities including local antibody production, mucus production and epithelial turnover; and (3) when type 2 inflammation persists, eosinophils promote fibrosis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis and asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia display similar immunohistological profiles

Patients with asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) do not exhibit clinical symptoms because of esophageal dysfunction, although they have endoscopic and histological findings similar to those of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The cause of the symptoms and the differences between aEE and EoE are unclear. The aim of this study is to determine whether aEE and EoE are same disease entities by comparing immune-related tissue biomarkers using immunohistological staining. Esophageal biopsy specimens from 61 patients, including 18 with aEE and 43 with EoE, were analyzed. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to quantify the immune-related tissue biomarkers such as major basic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, eotaxin-3, and immunoglobulin G4. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). There were no significant differences in clinical, endoscopic, or histological features, between patients with aEE and EoE, with the exception of body mass index. There were no significant differences in all immune-related tissue biomarkers between both groups. In conclusions, EoE and aEE displayed similar immunohistological profiles. Hence, they may be similar disease entities with some common pathogenic mechanisms. Our findings suggest that patients with aEE also have histopathological esophageal inflammation.

Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Dietary and Nondietary Approaches

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-driven chronic inflammatory condition, characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and confirmed histologically by esophageal mucosal eosinophilia. Since its first description in the 1990s, the incidence and prevalence of EoE have been on the rise. It is known to affect all ages of various ethnic backgrounds and both sexes; however, it is most seen in White males. Children with EoE often present with abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and failure to thrive, whereas adults with EoE typically present with dysphagia and food impaction. Diagnosis of EoE requires histologic confirmation of elevated esophageal eosinophils in a symptomatic patient, and only after secondary causes have been excluded. Because EoE is a chronic and progressively fibrostenotic disease, treatment goals include resolution of symptoms, induction and maintenance of disease remission, and prevention and possibly reversal of fibrostenotic complications, while minimizing treatment-related adverse effects and improving quality of life. Treatment strategies include the "3 D's"-drugs, diet, and dilation. Standard drug therapies include proton-pump inhibitors and topical corticosteroids. Dietary therapies include elemental diet, allergy testing-directed elimination diet, and empiric elimination diets. Endoscopic esophageal dilation for EoE strictures can alleviate esophageal symptoms but has no effect on mucosal inflammation. Recent progress in EoE research has made possible evidence-based clinical guidelines. Ongoing pharmacologic trials show promise for novel biologic agents in the treatment of refractory EoE.

Dysphagia as an Initial Manifestation of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological condition characterized clinically by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, with typical endoscopic findings and intra-epithelial eosinophilia on biopsy. This case report focuses on the historical aspect of EoE, clinical manifestations, and correlation with immune disorders, medical management, and interventional management of EoE. We present a 20-year-old patient presenting with tightness in throat and odynophagia after the ingestion of certain foods. These symptoms resolve in two or three hours. Endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract visualizes esophageal stenosis, and histological examination of the biopsy specimen reveals increased eosinophils in the esophageal mucosa. The patient was treated with fluticasone inhaler and has shown improvement in symptoms. EoE is a chronic esophageal disorder that is increasing in incidence and prevalence in both pediatric and adult age groups. This case report accentuates the complications of EoE, and delays in diagnosis lead to strictures, and fibro-stenotic disease and punctual recognition can govern the course of the disease.

Duodenal inflammation: an emerging target for functional dyspepsia?

Introduction: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders and is classified into postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndrome. Despite the recognition of duodenal inflammation as a potential trigger of symptoms, only limited anti-inflammatory therapies exist.Areas covered: This narrative review summarizes the recent advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of FD; it identifies potential therapeutic targets and gaps in the field. An electronic literature search was conducted in Pubmed up to 31st of December 2019.Expert opinion: There is compelling evidence for the role of duodenal inflammation and the eosinophil-mast cell axis in the pathogenesis of dyspeptic symptoms. Traditional prokinetic drugs and neuromodulators target gastric dysmotility and visceral hypersensitivity but are hampered by limited efficacy and side effects. Independent of acid suppression, the anti-inflammatory action of proton pump inhibitors, which remain the first-line therapy in FD, may also explain their therapeutic effect. Other existing and newly established anti-inflammatory drugs should be investigated while trials including probiotics and selective antibiotics should examine the host microbiome and immune activation. Targeted treatments for potential causes of duodenal pathology, such as impaired permeability and dysbiosis, are likely to emerge in the future.

Efficacy of an elimination diet in a patient with eosinophilic gastroenteritis : a pediatric case with multiple food allergies

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are chronic inflammatory diseases in which eosinophils highly infiltrate into gastrointestinal tissue, resulting in gastrointestinal dysfunction. Here, we report a case of pediatric eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE). A 7-year-old boy with multiple food allergies (cow milk, hen's egg, fish,shellfish, and chicken) was admitted to our hospital because of continuous abdominal pain and vomiting. His soy allergy had been diagnosed to have oral tolerance based on an oral food challenge at the age of 6 years. He was diagnosed with EGE based on biopsy findings showing eosinophilic infiltration ( 20 eosinophils per high-power field) into the gastrointestinal mucosa. A diet eliminating soy, wheat, beef, pork, rice, and sesame in addition to the food that had already been eliminated and oral corticosteroids improved his symptoms and peripheral eosinophilia. A relapse of both abdominal pain and peripheral eosinophilia after the reintroduction of soy or pork identified them as foods causative of EGE. This report highlights the utility of elimination diets in improving EGE symptoms and the subsequent reintroduction of offending foods in identifying causative foods. Furthermore,EGE onset should be considered when introducing potentially allergic food in the management of food allergy. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 201-204, February, 2019.

Epidemiology and implications of concurrent diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis and IBD based on a prospective population-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoO) and IBD are immune-mediated diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with possible overlapping pathogenic mechanisms. Our aim was to define the epidemiology and clinical implications of concurrent EoO and IBD diagnoses.

DESIGN

We conducted a prospective cohort analysis using the Truven MarketScan database (2009-2016) to estimate the incidence and prevalence of EoO in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or UC and vice versa. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the risk of EoO-related or IBD-related complications among patients with concurrent diagnoses.

RESULTS

Among 134 013 536 individuals, the incidence of EoO, CD and UC were 23.1, 51.2 and 55.2 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. The risk of EoO was higher among patients with CD (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 5.4, p<0.01; prevalence ratio (PR) 7.8, p<0.01) or UC (IRR 3.5, p<0.01; PR 5.0, p<0.01), while the risk of IBD was higher among patients with EoO (CD: IRR 5.7, p<0.01; PR 7.6, p<0.01; UC: IRR 3.4, p<0.01; PR 4.9, p<0.01) versus individuals without either diagnosis. Concurrent diagnosis of EoO and IBD was associated with greater composite risk of IBD-related complications (CD: adjusted HR (aHR) 1.09, p=0.01; UC: aHR 1.10, p=0.04) but lower composite risk of EoO-related complications (aHR 0.59; p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Based on a population-based prospective cohort analysis, the risk of EoO is significantly higher among patients with IBD and vice versa. Concurrent diagnoses might modify the risk of IBD-related and EoO-related complications. Studies defining the mechanisms underlying these observations are needed.

Mucosal impedance testing: A new diagnostic testing in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Current diagnostic testing for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include endoscopy, ambulatory pH and intraluminal impedance monitoring. However, they are suboptimal and do not measure chronicity of reflux. Recently, a mucosal impedance (MI) device has been developed to measure esophageal epithelial conductivity changes, a marker of chronic GERD. The aim of this review is to summarize the use of MI testing (MIT) for the evaluation and management of esophageal disease. MIT is a minimally invasive and simple through-the-scope procedure performed during endoscopy. It allows for a rapid derivation of MI values within seconds without an uncomfortable overnight pH- impedance catheter. The MI values can correlate with histological findings of epithelial barrier dysfunction, normalize with effective treatment, and show promise for differentiating GERD from non-GERD conditions such as eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). In conclusion, endoscopic MIT measurement can differentiate esophageal disorders instantly during endoscopy. It may not only serve as an important tool in diagnosing of GERD but also help guide therapy in clinically difficult situations as a surrogate to predict the treatment response.

Increased number of regulatory T cells in esophageal tissue of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis in comparison to gastro esophageal reflux disease and control groups

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a primarily polygenic allergic disorder. Although most patients have IgE sensitization, it seems that non-IgE mediated responses mainly contribute to the pathogenesis of EoE. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) may have an important role in allergies. There are limited data on the association of Tregs and EoE. In this study, we enumerated and compared T lymphocytes and Tregs in esophageal tissue of patients with EoE, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and normal controls.

METHODS

Ten patients with EoE, ten patients with GERD and eight normal controls were included. Immunohistochemistry staining was used to enumerate T lymphocytes and Tregs. CD3+ cells were considered as T cells and FOXP3+, CD3+ cells were considered as Tregs. T cells and Tregs were counted in 10 high power fields (HPF) (×400) for each patient and the average of 10 HPFs was recorded.

RESULTS

The mean±SEM of Tregs in esophageal tissue of patients with EoE (10.90±2.14cells/HPF) was significantly higher than the GERD (2.77±0.66cells/HPF) and control groups (0.37±0.08cells/HPF) (P<0.001). Additionally, the mean±SEM of T lymphocytes in esophageal tissue of patients with EoE (24.39±3.86cells/HPF) were increased in comparison to the GERD (10.07±2.65cells/HPF) and control groups (3.17±0.93cells/HPF) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is an increase in the number of esophageal T lymphocytes and regulatory T cells in patients with EoE compared to the GERD and control groups.

Serum eosinophilic cationic protein is correlated with food impaction and endoscopic severity in eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of the present study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and the correlation of ECP with clinical, histopathological, laboratory, and endoscopic features of EoE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with EoE and 14 healthy controls were included in the study. Demographic parameters were recorded. EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) was calculated according to endoscopic features, and esophageal biopsies were obtained by a single experienced endoscopist in a patient group. Serum ECP levels (μg/mL), absolute eosinophil count (U/mm3), and maximum peak of eosinophils/high-power field in esophageal biopsies were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of all participants was 33.0 (min-max: 18-46) years. There were 27 (93.1%) male patients. Serum ECP level was significantly higher in patients with EoE than in healthy volunteers (20.4 vs. 8.8, p<0.0001). According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, ECP had 80% sensitivity and 92.8% specificity to diagnose EoE with a cut-off value of 13.9 µg/mL (area under the ROC curve 0.895; p<0.0001; 95% CI: 0.725-0.978). EREFS (p<0.0001) and the presence of food impaction (p=0.04) were significantly correlated with ECP.

CONCLUSION

Serum ECP is an accurate non-invasive biomarker for EoE with high specificity and sensitivity. In addition, ECP is strongly correlated with EREFS and the symptom of food impaction.

Involvement of EP2 and EP4 Receptors in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The prostaglandin D₂ receptor DP2 has been implicated in eosinophil infiltration and the development of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

AIMS AND METHODS

In this study, we investigated an involvement of PGE₂ (EP1-EP4) and PGD₂ (DP1) receptors in EoE by measuring their expression in peripheral blood eosinophils and esophageal mucosal biopsies of EoE patients and by performing migration and adhesion assays with eosinophils from healthy donors.

RESULTS

Expression of EP2 and EP4, but not EP1 and EP3, was decreased in blood eosinophils of patients with EoE vs. control subjects. Adhesion of eosinophils to esophageal epithelial cells was decreased by EP2 receptor agonist butaprost and EP4 agonist ONO-AE1-329, whereas DP1 agonist BW245C increased adhesion. In chemotaxis assays with supernatant from human esophageal epithelial cells, only ONO-AE1-329 but not butaprost or BW245C inhibited the migration of eosinophils. Expression of EP and DP receptors in epithelial cells and eosinophils was detected in sections of esophageal biopsies from EoE patients by immunohistochemistry. qPCR of biopsies from EoE patients revealed that gene expression of EP4 and DP1 was the highest among PGE₂ and PGD₂ receptors. Esophageal epithelial cells in culture showed high gene expression for EP2 and EP4. Activation of EP2 and EP4 receptors decreased barrier integrity of esophageal epithelial cells in impedance assays.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of EP2 and EP4 receptors may inhibit eosinophil recruitment to the esophageal mucosa. However, their activation could negatively affect esophageal barrier integrity suggesting that eosinophilic rather than epithelial EP2 and EP4 have a protective role in EoE.

An Evolving Approach to the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic/ immune-mediated esophageal disease. Knowledge related to the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, epidemiology, natural history, treatment, and outcomes of EoE has rapidly evolved over the past 2 decades. This article focuses on the similarly evolving diagnostic framework for EoE. In the initial clinical guidelines, diagnosis of EoE was based on symptoms of esophageal dysfunction; at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) on esophageal biopsy; and either a lack of response to high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, or normal pH monitoring. The first 2 criteria have remained largely unchanged; however, the role of PPIs has been controversial, particularly due to the recognition of PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE), in which patients with suspected EoE experience resolution of symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia with PPI therapy. A quickly expanding evidence base has found that most adult patients with EoE and PPI-REE share similar clinical, endoscopic, histologic, immunologic, and molecular characteristics prior to the use of PPIs. Because of this, the most recent diagnostic guidelines have removed the lack of response to PPIs as a diagnostic criterion; PPIs are now better considered as a treatment for esophageal eosinophilia. EoE should currently be suspected on a clinical basis when there are symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and at least 15 eos/hpf on esophageal biopsies. A history of atopy and endoscopic signs of EoE are strongly supportive of the diagnosis. However, the diagnosis cannot be confirmed until a thorough evaluation of other potential causes of esophageal eosinophilia has been performed.

Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Patterns Discriminate Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis From Patients With GERD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is a challenge to make a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) because its symptoms and histologic features overlap with those of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A minimally invasive device was recently developed to detect mucosal impedance (MI) that measures epithelial integrity during upper endoscopy. We aimed to quantify MI along the esophagus and identify patterns that differentiated patients with and without GERD from those with EoE, and determine whether MI values and patterns are sufficient to identify patients with EoE using histologic findings as a reference.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 91 patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms referred for diagnostic testing for GERD and EoE from 2012 through 2014 (discovery set). During the first endoscopy, MI measurements were obtained at 2, 5, and 10 cm from the squamocolumnar junction. GERD was confirmed by ambulatory pH tests, and histologic analyses of biopsies were used to confirm EoE. We then used statistical modeling to identify MI patterns along the esophagus (at 10 cm, 5 cm, and 2 cm) that associated with GERD vs EoE. We validated our findings in a prospective cohort of 49 patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy for dysphagia, from 2015 through 2016, testing the ability of MI patterns to identify patients with vs. without EoE.

RESULTS

We found patients with EoE to have a unique MI pattern, with low values along the esophageal axis. MI measurements at 5 cm could discern patients with normal vs abnormal mucosa with 83% sensitivity and 79% specificity, and patients with EoE vs GERD with 84% sensitivity and 70% specificity; these measurements differentiated the patient populations with the highest level of accuracy of any of the 6 measurements tested. In the validation study, a rater using the esophageal MI pattern identified patients with EoE with 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity.

CONCLUSION

We identified and validated a pattern of MI along the esophagus that can identify patients with EoE vs normal mucosa or GERD with high levels of sensitivity.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a new disease. It is caused by a T-helper type 2 cell response to food antigens in contact with the esophageal mucosa. Although no single feature defines EoE, a constellation of compatible demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings establish the diagnosis. Children present with symptoms and endoscopic patterns characteristic of inflammation, whereas adolescents and adults have manifestations of fibrosis and gross esophageal strictures. Clinical and endoscopic scoring systems have helped to standardize diagnosis. There is controversy in EoE research over the optimal endpoint for treatment. Although the most common endpoint is a reduced number of eosinophils in biopsies, changes in symptoms and endoscopic features are becoming important targets of therapy. We should improve our understanding of EoE progression and the need for maintenance therapy, and continue development of diagnostic tools that avoid endoscopy and biopsy analyses to more easily monitor disease activity.

HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES OF EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an emerging disease featured by eosinophilic esophageal infiltrate not responsive to proton pump inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To characterize histological features of children and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital. Biopsies from each esophageal third from 14 patients (median age 7 years) with eosinophilic esophagitis were evaluated. Histological features evaluated included morphometry of esophageal epithelium, esophageal density (per high power field), extracellular eosinophilic granules, eosinophilic microabscesses, surface disposition of eosinophils, epithelial desquamation, peripapillary eosinophilia, basal layer hyperplasia and papillary elongation. RESULTS: Several patients presented a normal esophageal macroscopy in the upper digestive endoscopy (6, 42.8%), and the most common abnormality were vertical lines (7, 50%) and whitish spots over esophageal mucosa (7, 50%). Basal layer hyperplasia was observed in 88.8%, 100% e 80% of biopsies from proximal, middle and lower esophagus, respectively (P=0.22). Esophageal density ranges from 0 to more than 50 per hpf. Extracellular eosinophilic granules (70%-100%), surface disposition of eosinophils (60%-93%), epithelial desquamation (60%-100%), peripapillary eosinophilia (70%-80%) were common, but evenly distributed among each esophageal third. Just one patient did not present eosinophils in the lower third, four in the middle third and four in the upper esophageal third. CONCLUSION: In the absence of hypereosinophilia, other histological features are present in eosinophilic esophagitis and may contribute to diagnosis. Eosinophilic infiltrate is focal, therefore multiple biopsies are needed for diagnosis.

Current Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus diagnosed by the presence of esophageal symptoms accompanied by an esophageal eosinophilic infiltrate. EoE has an increasing worldwide prevalence and can be a cause of dysphagia and food impactions. There is an important role for the use of proton pump inhibitors in the diagnostic pathway of EoE. Treatment paradigms for EoE aim to minimize esophageal inflammation and improve symptom control. Dietary therapy targets dietary allergens and encompasses the elemental diet, the allergy testing-directed elimination diet, and the empiric elimination diet. Pharmacologic options include topical corticosteroids as the standard first-line treatment. Multiple other pharmacologic interventions are currently under investigation and are not recommended in the most recent guidelines. Endoscopic dilation is usually reserved for patients who relapse on pharmacologic or dietary regimens or who have symptomatic stricturing disease. This article provides a comprehensive discussion of existing diagnostic and management strategies for EoE.

Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Based on Pathophysiological Evidence

Over the past decades eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been increasingly diagnosed, and significant progress has been made in our understanding of its pathophysiology. As EoE cannot be cured yet, treatment goals are suppression of disease activity and symptoms as well as the prevention of progression to a more severe disease phenotype. Disease-modifying treatment options can be divided into dietary therapy and immunosuppressive medications, of which topical steroids have been most investigated, yet are still prescribed off-label. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in our understanding of EoE and discuss the mechanisms of action of current treatment options, with emphasis on the role of the esophageal epithelial barrier and the effects of proton-pump inhibitors in the management of patients with EoE.

Utility of esophageal mucosal impedance as a diagnostic test for esophageal disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to summarize the use of direct mucosal impedance (MI) for the evaluation and management of esophageal diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (MII-pH) monitoring has been considered the most sensitive test for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but recent studies have failed to establish impedance parameters that reliably predict treatment response to medical and surgical GERD therapies. MII-pH uses a catheter passed through the nose, which is uncomfortable for patients, and the test is compromised by the day-to-day variability of reflux patterns. Recently, an MI device has been developed that can be passed through the working channel of an endoscope to measure esophageal epithelial conductivity as a marker of chronic GERD. The MI values so obtained are available within seconds, correlate with histological findings of epithelial barrier dysfunction, normalize with effective treatment, and show promise for diagnosing eosinophilic esophagitis and for distinguishing it from GERD.

SUMMARY

MI can differentiate esophageal disorders instantly during endoscopy, and can monitor treatment responses in GERD and eosinophilic esophagitis.

Discovery and characterization of a novel humanized anti-IL-15 antibody and its relevance for the treatment of refractory celiac disease and eosinophilic esophagitis

Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a critical regulator of immune responses, especially at mucosal interfaces within the gastro-intestinal tract. Here, we describe the discovery and characterization of a humanized antibody to IL-15. Data from its epitope and mode of action, cell biology and primate pharmacology, as well as translational studies in human samples and in vivo proof-of-concept experiments in mouse models demonstrate the therapeutic potential of this new antibody targeting IL-15 for refractory celiac disease and eosinophilic esophagitis.

Combination Steroid and Test-based Food Elimination for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disorder characterized by infiltration of eosinophils into the esophagus. Primary treatment approaches include topical corticosteroids and/or food elimination. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of combination therapy (topical corticosteroid plus test-based food elimination [FS]) with single therapy (topical corticosteroid [S] or test-based food elimination [F]).

METHODS

Chart review of patients with EoE at Texas Children's Hospital (age <21 years) was performed. Clinical and histological statuses were evaluated after a 3-month treatment with either single or combination therapy. Comparisons were analyzed using Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and multiple logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 670 charts, 63 patients (1-21 years, median 10.3 years) with clinicopathologic diagnoses of EoE were identified. Combination FS therapy was provided to 51% (n = 32) and single treatment (S, F) to 27% (n = 17) or 22% (n = 14) of patients, respectively. Clinical responses were noted in 91% (n = 29), 71% (n = 12), and 64% (n = 14) of patients in the FS, S, and F groups, respectively. The odds of clinically improving were 4.6 times greater (95% confidence interval: 1.1-18.8) with combination versus single therapy. The median peak number of eosinophils per high-power field after 3-month therapy was not significantly different in the S, F, and FS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of topical corticosteroids with specific food elimination is as effective in achieving clinical and histological remissions as the single-treatment approaches. Responses were achieved with the combination in patients who had previously failed single-agent therapy. Prospective research of this combination approach in young patients with EoE is needed.

Effect of topical beclomethasone on inflammatory markers in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis: A pilot study

Background:

Topical corticosteroids have proven efficacy in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and are considered the cornerstone of therapy.

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of topical beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) therapy on clinical outcomes, esophageal eosinophilia, and other markers of inflammation in patients with EoE.

Methods:

Nine subjects with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of EoE were enrolled. In a cross-over design, the subjects were randomly assigned to a sequence of BDP and placebo. Treatment periods were 8 weeks, with a 4-week washout period. The subjects had endoscopic biopsies and blood tests at baseline and after each treatment period. They were instructed to maintain a diary of symptoms. Immuno-histochemical studies were performed for interleukins IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and transforming growth factor (TGF) beta. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed for IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17F, IL-25, IL-33, chemokine ligands (CCL)2, CCL5, CCL11, GM-CSF, and TGF-beta levels. The mast cell tryptase (MCT) level was measured in esophageal tissues.

Results:

BDP led to a significantly larger decrease in esophageal eosinophilia compared with placebo, but there was no significant change in peripheral eosinophilia and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein between the two groups. The study was not powered enough for us to report a significant improvement in clinical symptoms. There was a significant decrease in tissue IL-13 and MCT levels from baseline to the end of treatment between the treatment and placebo groups. Mean fold decreases in cytokine expression between the baseline and treatment groups were observed for IL-17F, IL-25, CCL2, and CCL5.

Conclusion:

Treatment with topical BDP was associated with significant decrease in esophageal eosinophilia, MCT and IL-13. BDP is a potential alternative to fluticasone propionate and budesonide for treatment of EoE. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

MAST CELLS DISTINGUISH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Mast cells exert a substantial role in gastrointestinal allergic diseases. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that mast cell may aid diagnosis in eosinophilic gastroenteropathy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether mast cell count in the esophageal epithelium can discriminate eosinophilic esophagitis, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Retrospectively we reviewed the files of 53 consecutive patients (age: 7.8 years; range: 8-14 years) with definitive diagnose established during clinical follow up in a universitary outpatient clinic as follow: eosinophilic esophagitis (N=23), PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis (N=15) and gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis (N=15). Eosinophil count in the esophageal epithelium in slides stained with H-E was reviewed and immunohistochemistry for mast cell tryptase was performed. RESULTS: Count of eosinophils/high-power field (HPF) higher than 15 were found in 14 out of 15 reflux esophagitis patients. The mean count of eosinophils/HPF was similar in eosinophilic esophagitis patients and in those with PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis (42 and 39 eosinophils/HPF, respectively, P=0.47). Values of mast cell tryptase (+) were higher in eosinophilic esophagitis [median: 25 mast cells/HPF; range (17-43) ] and in PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis patients [25 (16-32) ], compared to reflux esophagitis [4 (2-14) ], P<0.001. There was no difference between the mean count of mast cells/HPF in the esophageal epithelium of eosinophilic esophagitis patients and PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis patients, respectively, 26 and 24 mast cells/HPF, P=0.391. CONCLUSION: Tryptase staining of mast cells differentiates eosinophilic esophagitis from reflux esophagitis.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Noninvasive Biomarkers for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) often requires multiple endoscopies. Serum biomarkers can be elevated in EoE patients, but their clinical utility in diagnosis and assessing response to treatment is not well established.

GOALS

To evaluate serum biomarkers in EoE subjects compared with controls and assess longitudinally in response to treatment.

STUDY

We conducted a prospective cohort study of children and adults undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for suspected EoE. After completing an 8-week course of proton-pump inhibitor therapy, esophageal mucosal biopsies were obtained, as well as, serum analysis of absolute eosinophil count (AEC), eotaxin-3, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and interleukin-5. Subjects with normal endoscopic and histologic findings constituted controls. Those meeting criteria for EoE underwent repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biomarker measurements following treatment with topical steroids for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Median levels of AEC (263.50 vs. 102 cu/mm, P<0.001), ECP (26.98 vs. 5.20 ng/mL, P<0.001) and EDN (31.70 vs. 14.18 ng/mL, P=0.004) were significantly elevated in EoE subjects compared with controls and correlated with esophageal eosinophilia. Levels of AEC (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.64) and ECP (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.36) were associated with a diagnosis of EoE. Among the 5 biomarkers evaluated, only AEC significantly predicted esophageal eosinophilia following topical steroid therapy in EoE subjects (P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

AEC, ECP, and EDN were higher in EoE subjects compared with controls and correlated with degree of esophageal eosinophilia. Furthermore, AEC predicted post-treatment eosinophilia, suggesting a potential role in monitoring EoE disease activity.

Immunopathogenesis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyposis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a troublesome, chronic inflammatory disease that affects over 10% of the adult population, causing decreased quality of life, lost productivity, and lost time at work and leading to more than a million surgical interventions annually worldwide. The nose, paranasal sinuses, and associated lymphoid tissues play important roles in homeostasis and immunity, and CRS significantly impairs these normal functions. Pathogenic mechanisms of CRS have recently become the focus of intense investigations worldwide, and significant progress has been made. The two main forms of CRS that have been long recognized, with and without nasal polyps, are each now known to be heterogeneous, based on underlying mechanism, geographical location, and race. Loss of the immune barrier, including increased permeability of mucosal epithelium and reduced production of important antimicrobial substances and responses, is a common feature of many forms of CRS. One form of CRS with polyps found worldwide is driven by the cytokines IL-5 and IL-13 coming from Th2 cells, type 2 innate lymphoid cells, and probably mast cells. Type 2 cytokines activate inflammatory cells that are implicated in the pathogenic mechanism, including mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. New classes of biological drugs that block the production or action of these cytokines are making important inroads toward new treatment paradigms in polypoid CRS.

Effective and safe proton pump inhibitor therapy in acid-related diseases - A position paper addressing benefits and potential harms of acid suppression

BACKGROUND

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases. Studies in primary care and emergency settings suggest that PPIs are frequently prescribed for inappropriate indications or for indications where their use offers little benefit. Inappropriate PPI use is a matter of great concern, especially in the elderly, who are often affected by multiple comorbidities and are taking multiple medications, and are thus at an increased risk of long-term PPI-related adverse outcomes as well as drug-to-drug interactions. Herein, we aim to review the current literature on PPI use and develop a position paper addressing the benefits and potential harms of acid suppression with the purpose of providing evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate use of these medications.

METHODS

The topics, identified by a Scientific Committee, were assigned to experts selected by three Italian Scientific Societies, who independently performed a systematic search of the relevant literature using Medline/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Search outputs were distilled, paying more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analyses (where available) representing the best evidence. The draft prepared on each topic was circulated amongst all the members of the Scientific Committee. Each expert then provided her/his input to the writing, suggesting changes and the inclusion of new material and/or additional relevant references. The global recommendations were then thoroughly discussed in a specific meeting, refined with regard to both content and wording, and approved to obtain a summary of current evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-five years after their introduction into clinical practice, PPIs remain the mainstay of the treatment of acid-related diseases, where their use in gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, Helicobacter pylori infection, peptic ulcer disease and bleeding as well as, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is appropriate. Prevention of gastroduodenal mucosal lesions (and symptoms) in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antiplatelet therapies and carrying gastrointestinal risk factors also represents an appropriate indication. On the contrary, steroid use does not need any gastroprotection, unless combined with NSAID therapy. In dyspeptic patients with persisting symptoms, despite successful H. pylori eradication, short-term PPI treatment could be attempted. Finally, addition of PPIs to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with refractory steatorrhea may be worthwhile.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PPIs are irreplaceable drugs in the management of acid-related diseases. However, PPI treatment, as any kind of drug therapy, is not without risk of adverse effects. The overall benefits of therapy and improvement in quality of life significantly outweigh potential harms in most patients, but those without clear clinical indication are only exposed to the risks of PPI prescription. Adhering with evidence-based guidelines represents the only rational approach to effective and safe PPI therapy. Please see related Commentary: doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0724-1 .

The Inflammatory Milieu of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Contemporary Review With Emphasis in Putative Immunohistochemistry and Serologic Markers

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic disease characterized by esophageal dysfunction, frequent clinical history of atopy, and eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus. Within the esophageal mucosa, there is a wide variety of immune mediators, chemotactic factors, mediators of transcription, and markers of epithelial differentiation and integrity that are overexpressed or underexpressed in eosinophilic esophagitis, offering many candidates for biomarkers with diagnostic or prognostic potential. In this review, we summarize the results from studies performed so far to evaluate the detection of these markers by immunohistochemistry on esophageal biopsies. In addition, we briefly describe some attempts to identify markers that could be detected in serum to be used to diagnose or monitor the disease without the need of a biopsy.

Eosinophil infiltration in the upper gastrointestinal tract of patients with bronchial asthma

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is related to allergic diseases such as bronchial asthma (BA), atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. The aim of this study was to examine the eosinophil infiltration in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract in patients with BA using esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

METHODS

Patients with BA who had upper GI tract symptoms were enrolled. Patients who received systemically administered steroids were excluded. Eosinophil infiltrations in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were examined with regard to the endoscopic findings and pathological findings of biopsy specimens (UMIN000010132).

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled from October in 2012 to September in 2014. Thirty-six were male, 54 were female, and the mean age was 57.5 years. Eighty-one (90%) used inhaled corticosteroids. Fourteen patients (15.6%) had reflux esophagitis, 8 of whom had grade A and 6 had grade B. No patient with EoE was observed. One female patient who had marked eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum was diagnosed as having eosinophilic gastroenteritis, but endoscopy showed only mucosal edema in the antrum. Another female patient who had marked eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum was diagnosed as having eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and endoscopy showed erosions in the antrum and the duodenum. Three patients had eosinophil infiltration in the stomach, but none of them had severe symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with asthma who had upper gastrointestinal symptoms rarely had eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. Biopsy specimens are of high importance in the diagnosis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders even if there is no remarkable endoscopic finding.

Pharmacological treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory diseases characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, in the absence of other known causes of eosinophilia.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical management of EGIDs is challenging, as there are currently limited therapeutic options available. The most common EGID is eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and rarer forms are eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and eosinophilic colitis. Clinical presentation depends on the affected GI site. Recently duodenal eosinophilia has been recognized to commonly be present in patients with functional dyspepsia. This review will provide an overview of the pathogenesis and therapeutic management of EGIDs, with particular focus on the pharmacological strategies for these conditions. Expert commentary: Despite the considerable progress made in understanding the pathogenesis of EGIDs, there is still an urgent need for the development of specific and effective therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic management protocols are required that are based on rigorous clinical investigation in large prospective controlled trials to better understand the risks, benefits and limitations of each therapy. More well-defined and consistent end-points are also required to assess treatment outcomes, as there has been variability between patient reported outcomes, clinical outcomes, and histological outcomes in the studies to date.

High rate of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose sensitization in both eosinophilic esophagitis and patients undergoing upper endoscopy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an antigen/allergy-mediated chronic inflammatory condition. The rapid rise in the number of cases of EoE suggests an as-yet undiscovered environmental trigger. This study tested the hypothesis that immunoglobulin E (IgE) to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal), a newly recognized sensitization induced by a tick bite that causes mammalian meat allergy, is a risk factor for EoE. We conducted a case-control study using prospectively collected and stored samples in the University of North Carolina EoE Patient Registry and Biobank. Serum from 50 subjects with a new diagnosis of EoE and 50 non-EoE subjects (either with gastroesophageal reflux disease or dysphagia from non-EoE etiologies) was tested for alpha-gal-specific IgE using an ImmunoCAP-based method. Specific IgE > 0.35 kUA /L was considered a positive result. Subjects with EoE were a mean of 35 years old, 68% were male, and 94% were white. Non-EoE controls were a mean of 42 years, 50% were male, and 78% were white. A total of 22 (22%) subjects overall had alpha-gal-specific IgE > 0.35 kUA /L. Of the EoE cases, 12 (24%) were positive, and of the non-EoE controls, 10 (20%) were positive (p=0.63). Neither the proportion sensitized nor the absolute values differed between EoE and non-EoE subjects. We found a similar but high rate of alpha-gal sensitization in patients with EoE as found in non-EoE controls who were undergoing endoscopy. While our data do not support alpha-gal sensitization as a risk factor for EoE, the high rates of sensitization observed in patients undergoing upper endoscopy for symptoms of esophageal dysfunction is a new finding.

Case report of proton pump inhibitor responsive esophageal eosinophilia: why 2 months of proton pump inhibitors is required

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease defined by the 2nd EoE consensus panel as: 'symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field, eosinophilia that persists after a trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and exclusion of other secondary causes of esophageal eosinophilia'. After Ngo et al. first reported a case series of 3 patients initially diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis responding endoscopically and histologically to PPI therapy, the term PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia has evolved. Several studies have since confirmed the existence of this entity. Although recent ACG guidelines call for a 2-month course of PPI followed by endoscopy biopsies this recommendation is classified as a strong recommendation with 'low evidence', and has not been proven in the literature. We present a case of PPI-REE treated with rabeprazole 20 mg BID for 2 months, and describe simultaneous symptom resolution with histological and endoscopic remission of disease. This unique case with serial endoscopy and histology at baseline and monthly suggests the current recommendation of at least two months therapy with PPIs dosed twice daily is appropriate. Future studies will need to address duration of high dose therapy, whether patients can be stepped down to once a day PPI, and therapeutic strategy for transient responders.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the oesophagus, characterized by symptoms of dysphagia or food bolus obstruction. Diagnosis is supported by typical histological findings. This article covers pertinent aspects of the disease, pathogenic explanations and treatment options.

Paired Ig-like Receptor B Inhibits IL-13-Driven Eosinophil Accumulation and Activation in the Esophagus

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a Th2 cytokine-associated disease characterized by eosinophil infiltration, epithelial cell hyperplasia, and tissue remodeling. Recent studies highlighted a major contribution for IL-13 in EoE pathogenesis. Paired Ig-like receptor B is a cell surface immune-inhibitory receptor that is expressed by eosinophils and postulated to regulate eosinophil development and migration. We report that Pirb is upregulated in the esophagus after inducible overexpression of IL-13 (CC10-Il13(Tg) mice) and is overexpressed by esophageal eosinophils. CC10-Il13(Tg)/Pirb(-/-) mice displayed increased esophageal eosinophilia and EoE pathology, including epithelial cell thickening, fibrosis, and angiogenesis, compared with CC10-Il13(Tg)/Pirb(+/+) mice. Transcriptome analysis of primary Pirb(+/+) and Pirb(-/-) esophageal eosinophils revealed increased expression of transcripts associated with promoting tissue remodeling in Pirb(-/-) eosinophils, including profibrotic genes, genes promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and genes associated with epithelial growth. These data identify paired Ig-like receptor B as a molecular checkpoint in IL-13-induced eosinophil accumulation and activation, which may serve as a novel target for future therapy in EoE.

A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Esophageal Clearance Times of Oral Budesonide Preparations

BACKGROUND

Topical steroids prepared as oral viscous slurries have become common in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Esophageal mucosal contact time correlates with clinical and histologic improvement.

AIM

To compare the mucosal contact time of alternative oral viscous budesonide (OVB) slurries with the conventional sucralose OVB.

METHODS

A blinded randomized crossover trial investigating esophageal clearance of three OVB slurry preparations was done on healthy adults. Honey and xanthan gum OVB slurries were compared with standard sucralose OVB in 24 randomly assigned subjects. Each subject ingested the sucralose OVB and either the honey or xanthan gum OVB slurries. The esophageal clearance of each slurry was evaluated as an area under the curve (AUC) using 1 millicurie of technetium-99m-sulfur colloid (Tc99) co-administered in each OVB preparation using nuclear scintigraphy. A standardized taste survey was also administered.

RESULTS

Xanthan gum had greater mucosal contact time compared to sucralose as measured by a higher AUC at 3 min (P = 0.002), while honey showed no significant difference in esophageal clearance relative to sucralose. Taste scores were significantly higher in the honey group, while scores for xanthan gum were no different from standard sucralose.

CONCLUSION

OVB slurries utilizing xanthan gum may be a superior alternative to a sucralose-based slurry due to its increased mucosal contact time and similar taste tolerance. Honey may be a suitable alternative as well, due to its similar contact time and favorable taste.

Accuracy of digital mRNA profiling of oesophageal biopsies as a novel diagnostic approach to eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Quantification of tissue eosinophils remains the golden standard in diagnosing eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), but this approach suffers from poor specificity. It has been recognized that histopathological changes that occur in patients with EoE are associated with a disease-specific tissue transcriptome.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that digital mRNA profiling targeted at a set of EoE-specific and Th2 inflammatory genes in oesophageal biopsies could help differentiate patients with EoE from those with reflux oesophagitis (RE) or normal tissue histology (NH).

METHODS

The mRNA expression levels of 79 target genes were defined in both proximal and distal biopsies of 196 patients with nCounter® (Nanostring) technology. According to clinicopathological diagnosis, these patients were grouped in a training set (35 EoE, 30 RE, 30 NH) for building of a three-class prediction model using the random forest method, and a blinded predictive set (n = 47) for model validation.

RESULTS

A diagnostic model built on ten differentially expressed genes was able to differentiate with 100% sensitivity and specificity between conditions in the training set. In a blinded predictive set, this model was able to correctly predict EoE in 14 of 18 patients in distal (sensitivity 78%, 95% CI 52-93%) and 16 of 18 patients in proximal biopsies (sensitivity 89%, 95% CI 64-98%), without false-positive diagnosis of EoE in RE or NH patients (specificity 100%, 95% CI 85-100%). Sensitivity was increased to 94% (95% CI 71-100%) when either the best predictive distal or proximal biopsy was used.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We conclude that mRNA profiling of oesophageal tissue is an accurate diagnostic strategy in detecting EoE.