1
|
Oh CK, Cho YW, Jung J, Lee HY, Kim JB, Cho YS. Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 2024; 14:20335. [PMID: 39223224 PMCID: PMC11369165 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71067-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Incomplete resection rates vary among endoscopists performing cold snare polypectomy. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) is the technique of cold resection after submucosal injection to reduce incomplete resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CS-EMR for small colorectal polyps compared to hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR). Preplanned sample size required 70 polyps to CS-EMR group or HS-EMR group, respectively. Patients with polyps sized 6-9 mm were randomly allocated to either the CS-EMR or the HS-EMR group. The primary outcome was residual or recurrent adenoma (RAA) rate. A total of 70 and 68 polyps were resected using CS-EMR and HS-EMR, respectively. In the intention-to-treat population, the RAA rate was 0% in the CS-EMR group and 1.5% in the HS-EMR group (risk difference [RD], - 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 4.34 to 1.39). En bloc resection rate was 98.6% and 98.5% (RD, - 0.04; 95% CI - 4.12 to 4.02); the R0 resection rate was 55.7% and 82.4% (RD, - 27.80; 95% CI - 42.50 to - 13.10). The total procedure time was 172 s (IQR, 158-189) in the CS-EMR group and 186 s (IQR, 147-216) in the HS-EMR group (median difference, - 14; 95% CI - 32 to 2). Delayed bleeding was 2.9% vs 1.5% (RD, 1.37; 95% CI - 3.47 to 6.21) in both groups, respectively. CS-EMR was non-inferior to HS-EMR for the treatment of small colorectal polyps. CS-EMR can be considered one of the standard methods for the removal of colorectal polyps sized 6-9 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Kyo Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University of Korea, 1 Singil-ro, Yeoungdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, South Korea.
| | - Young Wook Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jiyoon Jung
- Departments of Pathology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Yeon Lee
- Departments of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul, Soonchunhyang University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Bae Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University of Korea, 1 Singil-ro, Yeoungdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, South Korea
| | - Young-Seok Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Young E, Rajagopalan A, Singh R. Reply. Gastroenterology 2024; 167:414-415. [PMID: 38521095 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Young
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Arvind Rajagopalan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boysen ML, Troelsen FS, Sørensen HT, Erichsen R. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: clinical and molecular characteristics and survival. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:1043-1052. [PMID: 38483686 PMCID: PMC11217032 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01861-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies suggest that patients with type two diabetes mellitus (T2D) may be at increased risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We investigated clinical and molecular characteristics and survival of T2D patients with PCCRC to elucidate how T2D-related PCCRC may arise. METHODS We identified T2D patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from 1995 to 2015 and computed prevalence ratios (PRs) comparing clinical and molecular characteristics of CRC in T2D patients with PCCRC vs. in T2D patients with colonoscopy-detected CRC (dCRC). We also followed T2D patients from the diagnosis of PCCRC/dCRC until death, emigration, or study end and compared mortality using Cox-proportional hazards regression models adjusted for sex, age, year of CRC diagnosis, and CRC stage. RESULTS Compared with dCRC, PCCRC was associated with a higher prevalence of proximal CRCs (54% vs. 40%; PR: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.62) in T2D patients. We found no difference between PCCRC vs. dCRC for CRC stage, histology, and mismatch repair status. The proportion of CRCs that could be categorized as PCCRC decreased over time. Within one year after CRC, 63% of PCCRC vs. 78% of dCRC patients were alive (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85 [95% CI 1.47-2.31]). Within five years after CRC, 44% of PCCRC vs. 54% of dCRC patients were still alive (HR 1.44 [95% CI 1.11-1.87]). CONCLUSION The increased prevalence of proximally located PCCRCs and the poorer survival may suggest overlooked colorectal lesions as a predominant explanation for T2D-related PCCRC, although altered tumor progression cannot be ruled out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette L Boysen
- Department of Surgery, Gødstrup Regional Hospital, 7400, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Frederikke S Troelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, 8930, Randers, Denmark.
| | - Henrik T Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, 8930, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Troelsen FS, Sørensen HT, Erichsen R. Risk of a post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in patients with diverticular disease: a population-based cohort study. Endoscopy 2024; 56:471-481. [PMID: 38331045 DOI: 10.1055/a-2264-8199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) may account for up to 30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed in patients with diverticular disease; however, absolute and relative risks of PCCRC among these patients undergoing colonoscopy remain unknown. METHODS We performed a cohort study (1995-2015) including patients with and without diverticular disease who underwent colonoscopy. We calculated 7-36-month cumulative incidence proportions (CIPs) of PCCRC. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) of PCCRC, comparing patients with and without diverticular disease, as a measure of relative risk. We calculated 3-year PCCRC rates, as per World Endoscopy Organization recommendations, to estimate the proportion of CRC patients with and without diverticular disease who were considered to have PCCRC. We stratified all analyses by PCCRC location. RESULTS We observed 373 PCCRCs among 56 642 patients with diverticular disease and 1536 PCCRCs among 306 800 patients without diverticular disease. The PCCRC CIP after first-time colonoscopy was 0.45% (95%CI 0.40%-0.51%) for patients with and 0.36% (95%CI 0.34%-0.38%) for patients without diverticular disease. Comparing patients with and without diverticular disease undergoing first-time colonoscopy, the adjusted HR was 0.84 (95%CI 0.73-0.97) for PCCRC and 1.23 (95%CI 1.01-1.50) for proximal PCCRCs. The 3-year PCCRC rate was 19.0% (22.3% for proximal PCCRCs) for patients with and 6.5% for patients without diverticular disease. CONCLUSIONS Although the absolute risk was low, the relative risk of proximal PCCRCs may be elevated in patients with diverticular disease undergoing colonoscopy compared with patients without the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederikke S Troelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Henrik T Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yates J, Schaufelberger H, Steinacher R, Schär P, Truninger K, Boeva V. DNA-methylation variability in normal mucosa: a field cancerization marker in patients with adenomatous polyps. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:974-982. [PMID: 38273663 PMCID: PMC11160500 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phenomenon of field cancerization reflects the transition of normal cells into those predisposed to cancer. Assessing the scope and intensity of this process in the colon may support risk prediction and colorectal cancer prevention. METHODS The Swiss Epigenetic Colorectal Cancer Study (SWEPIC) study, encompassing 1111 participants for DNA methylation analysis and a subset of 84 for RNA sequencing, was employed to detect field cancerization in individuals with adenomatous polyps (AP). Methylation variations were evaluated for their discriminative capability, including in external cohorts, genomic localization, clinical correlations, and associated RNA expression patterns. RESULTS Normal cecal tissue of individuals harboring an AP in the proximal colon manifested dysregulated DNA methylation compared to tissue from healthy individuals at 558 unique loci. Leveraging these adenoma-related differentially variable and methylated CpGs (aDVMCs), our classifier discerned between healthy and AP-adjacent tissues across SWEPIC datasets (cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC AUC] = 0.63-0.81), including within age-stratified cohorts. This discriminative capacity was validated in 3 external sets, differentiating healthy from cancer-adjacent tissue (ROC AUC = 0.82-0.88). Notably, aDVMC dysregulation correlated with polyp multiplicity. More than 50% of aDVMCs were significantly associated with age. These aDVMCs were enriched in active regions of the genome (P < .001), and associated genes exhibited altered expression in AP-adjacent tissues. CONCLUSIONS Our findings underscore the early onset of field cancerization in the right colon during the neoplastic transformation process. A more extensive validation of aDVMC dysregulation as a stratification tool could pave the way for enhanced surveillance approaches, especially given its linkage to adenoma emergence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Yates
- Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- ETH AI Center, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Primo Schär
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kaspar Truninger
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Valentina Boeva
- Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- ETH AI Center, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cochin Institute, Inserm U1016, National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8104, Paris Descartes University UMR-S1016, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheung KS. Big data approach in the field of gastric and colorectal cancer research. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:1027-1032. [PMID: 38413187 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Big data is characterized by three attributes: volume, variety,, and velocity. In healthcare setting, big data refers to vast dataset that is electronically stored and managed in an automated manner and has the potential to enhance human health and healthcare system. In this review, gastric cancer (GC) and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) will be used to illustrate application of big data approach in the field of gastrointestinal cancer research. Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication only reduces GC risk by 46% due to preexisting precancerous lesions. Apart from endoscopy surveillance, identifying medications that modify GC risk is another strategy. Population-based cohort studies showed that long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) associated with higher GC risk after HP eradication, while aspirin and statins associated with lower risk. While diabetes mellitus conferred 73% higher GC risk, metformin use associated with 51% lower risk, effect of which was independent of glycemic control. Nonetheless, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs) are not associated with lower GC risk. CRC can still occur after initial colonoscopy in which no cancer was detected (i.e. PCCRC). Between 2005 and 2013, the rate of interval-type PCCRC-3y (defined as CRC diagnosed between 6 and 36 months of index colonoscopy which was negative for CRC) was 7.9% in Hong Kong, with >80% being distal cancers and higher cancer-specific mortality compared with detected CRC. Certain clinical and endoscopy-related factors were associated with PCCRC-3 risk. Medications shown to have chemopreventive effects on PCCRC include statins, NA-NSAIDs, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Shing Cheung
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Bleijenberg AGC, Depla A, Montazeri NSM, Dekker E. Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2024; 56:412-420. [PMID: 38191001 DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-7823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies demonstrated that a higher proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among endoscopists is associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence and death for their patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning resource on PSPDR. METHODS We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial within the Dutch fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopists were randomized using block randomization per center to either receive a 60-minute e-learning resource on serrated polyp detection or not. PSPDR was calculated based on all colonoscopies performed during a 27-month pre-intervention and a 17-month post-intervention period. The primary end point was difference in PSPDR between intervention and control arms (intention to treat) using mixed effect logistic regression modeling, with time (pre-intervention/post-intervention) and interaction between time and arm (intervention/control) as fixed effects, and endoscopists as random effects. RESULTS 116 endoscopists (57 intervention, 59 controls) were included, and performed 27494 and 33888 colonoscopies, respectively. Median PSPDR pre-intervention was 13.6% (95%CI 13.0-14.1) in the intervention arm and 13.8% (95%CI 13.3-14.3) in controls. Post-intervention PSPDR was significantly higher over time in the intervention arm than in controls (17.1% vs. 15.4%, P=0.01). CONCLUSION In an era of increased awareness and increasing PSPDRs, endoscopists who undertook a one-time e-learning course significantly accelerated the increase in PSPDR compared with endoscopists who did not undertake the e-learning. Widespread implementation might reduce PCCRC incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arne G C Bleijenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne Depla
- Department of Gastroenterology, DC Klinieken, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nahid S M Montazeri
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kabir M, Thomas-Gibson S, Ahmad A, Kader R, Al-Hillawi L, Mcguire J, David L, Shah K, Rao R, Vega R, East JE, Faiz OD, Hart AL, Wilson A. Cancer Biology or Ineffective Surveillance? A Multicentre Retrospective Analysis of Colitis-Associated Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:686-694. [PMID: 37941424 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is associated with high rates of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer [PCCRC], but further in-depth qualitative analyses are required to determine whether they result from inadequate surveillance or aggressive IBD cancer evolution. METHODS All IBD patients who had a colorectal cancer [CRC] diagnosed between January 2015 and July 2019 and a recent [<4 years] surveillance colonoscopy at one of four English hospital trusts underwent root cause analyses as recommended by the World Endoscopy Organisation to identify plausible PCCRC causative factors. RESULTS In total, 61% [n = 22/36] of the included IBD CRCs were PCCRCs. They developed in patients with high cancer risk factors [77.8%; n = 28/36] requiring annual surveillance, yet 57.1% [n = 20/35] had inappropriately delayed surveillance. Most PCCRCs developed in situations where [i] an endoscopically unresectable lesion was detected [40.9%; n = 9/22], [ii] there was a deviation from the planned management pathway [40.9%; n = 9/22], such as service-, clinician- or patient-related delays in acting on a detected lesion, or [iii] lesions were potentially missed as they were typically located within areas of active inflammation or post-inflammatory change [36.4%; n = 8/22]. CONCLUSIONS IBD PCCRC prevention will require more proactive strategies to reduce endoscopic inflammatory burden, and to improve lesion optical characterization, adherence to recommended surveillance intervals, and patient acceptance of prophylactic colectomy. However, the significant proportion appearing to originate from non-adenomatous-looking mucosa which fail to yield neoplasia on biopsy yet display aggressive cancer evolution highlights the limitations of current surveillance. Emerging molecular biomarkers may play a role in enhancing cancer risk stratification in future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha Kabir
- Division of GI Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Endoscopy Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ahmir Ahmad
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Endoscopy Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rawen Kader
- Division of GI Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lulia Al-Hillawi
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joshua Mcguire
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lewis David
- Department of Gastroenterology, East and North Hertfordshire, Stevenage, UK
| | - Krishna Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rohit Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Roser Vega
- Division of GI Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Omar D Faiz
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- IBD Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Endoscopy Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wisse PHA, de Boer SY, Oudkerk Pool M, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Verveer C, Meijer GA, Dekker E, Spaander MCW. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in a national fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2024; 56:364-372. [PMID: 38101446 DOI: 10.1055/a-2230-5563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) decrease the effect of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. To enable PCCRC incidence reduction in the long-term, we classified PCCRCs diagnosed after colonoscopies performed in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS PCCRCs diagnosed after colonoscopies performed between 2014-2016 for a positive FIT in the Dutch CRC screening program were included. PCCRCs were categorized according to the World Endoscopy Organization consensus statement into (a) interval PCCRC (diagnosed before the recommended surveillance); (b) non-interval type A (diagnosed at the recommended surveillance interval); (c) non-interval type B (diagnosed after the recommended surveillance interval); or (d) non-interval type C (diagnosed after the intended recommended surveillance interval, with surveillance not implemented owing to co-morbidity). The most probable etiology was determined by root-cause analysis. Tumor stage distributions were compared between categories. RESULTS 116362 colonoscopies were performed after a positive FIT with 9978 screen-detected CRCs. During follow-up, 432 PCCRCs were diagnosed. The 3-year PCCRC rate was 2.7%. PCCRCs were categorized as interval (53.5%), non-interval type A (14.6%), non-interval type B (30.6%), and non-interval type C (1.4%). The most common etiology for interval PCCRCs was possible missed lesion with adequate examination (73.6%); they were more often diagnosed at an advanced stage (stage III/IV; 53.2%) compared with non-interval type A (15.9%; P<0.001) and non-interval type B (40.9%; P=0.03) PCCRCs. CONCLUSIONS The 3-year PCCRC rate was low in this FIT-based CRC screening program. Approximately half of PCCRCs were interval PCCRCs. These were mostly caused by missed lesions and were diagnosed at a more advanced stage. This emphasizes the importance of high quality colonoscopy with optimal polyp detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter H A Wisse
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sybrand Y de Boer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Oudkerk Pool
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Claudia Verveer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miyaguchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Hirooka N, Matsumoto H, Ohgo H, Nakamoto H, Imaeda H. Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2024; 56:376-383. [PMID: 38191000 PMCID: PMC11038826 DOI: 10.1055/a-2239-8145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. Both linked-color imaging (LCI) with artificial intelligence (LCA) and LCI alone increase adenoma detection during colonoscopy, although it remains unclear whether one modality is superior. This study compared ADR between LCA and LCI alone, including according to endoscopists' experience (experts and trainees) and polyp size. METHODS Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at a single institution were randomly assigned to the LCA or LCI group. ADR, adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, number of adenomas per location, and adenoma size were compared. RESULTS The LCA (n=400) and LCI (n=400) groups showed comparable cecal intubation and withdrawal times. The LCA group showed a significantly higher ADR (58.8% vs. 43.5%; P<0.001) and mean (95%CI) APC (1.31 [1.15 to 1.47] vs. 0.94 [0.80 to 1.07]; P<0.001), particularly in the ascending colon (0.30 [0.24 to 0.36] vs. 0.20 [0.15 to 0.25]; P=0.02). Total number of nonpolypoid-type adenomas was also significantly higher in the LCA group (0.15 [0.09 to 0.20] vs. 0.08 [0.05 to 0.10]; P=0.02). Small polyps (≤5, 6-9mm) were detected significantly more frequently in the LCA group (0.75 [0.64 to 0.86] vs. 0.48 [0.40 to 0.57], P<0.001 and 0.34 [0.26 to 0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.18 to 0.29], P=0.04, respectively). In both groups, ADR was not significantly different between experts and trainees. CONCLUSIONS LCA was significantly superior to LCI alone in terms of ADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuya Miyaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Tsuzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Hirooka
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hisashi Matsumoto
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohgo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hidetomo Nakamoto
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Imaeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee MCM, Parker CH, Liu LWC, Farahvash A, Jeyalingam T. Impact of study design on adenoma detection in the evaluation of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:676-687.e16. [PMID: 38272274 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported that artificial intelligence (AI) improves endoscopic polyp detection. Different methodologies-namely, parallel and tandem designs-have been used to evaluate the efficacy of AI-assisted colonoscopy in RCTs. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported a pooled effect that includes both study designs. However, it is unclear whether there are inconsistencies in the reported results of these 2 designs. Here, we aimed to determine whether study characteristics moderate between-trial differences in outcomes when evaluating the effectiveness of AI-assisted polyp detection. METHODS A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore was performed through March 1, 2023, for RCTs comparing AI-assisted colonoscopy with routine high-definition colonoscopy in polyp detection. The primary outcome of interest was the impact of study type on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included the impact of the study type on adenomas per colonoscopy and withdrawal time, as well as the impact of geographic location, AI system, and endoscopist experience on ADR. Pooled event analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS Twenty-four RCTs involving 17,413 colonoscopies (AI assisted: 8680; non-AI assisted: 8733) were included. AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR (risk ratio [RR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.31; I2 = 53%; P < .001). Tandem studies collectively demonstrated improved ADR in AI-aided colonoscopies (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.30; I2 = 0%; P < .001), as did parallel studies (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.35; I2 = 62%; P < .001), with no statistical subgroup difference between study design. Both tandem and parallel study designs revealed improvement in adenomas per colonoscopy in AI-aided colonoscopies, but this improvement was more marked among tandem studies (P < .001). AI assistance significantly increased withdrawal times for parallel (P = .002), but not tandem, studies. ADR improvement was more marked among studies conducted in Asia compared to Europe and North America in a subgroup analysis (P = .007). Type of AI system used or endoscopist experience did not affect overall improvement in ADR. CONCLUSIONS Either parallel or tandem study design can capture the improvement in ADR resulting from the use of AI-assisted polyp detection systems. Tandem studies powered to detect differences in endoscopic performance through paired comparison may be a resource-efficient method of evaluating new AI-assisted technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C M Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colleen H Parker
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louis W C Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Armin Farahvash
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thurarshen Jeyalingam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baile‐Maxía S, Mangas‐Sanjuan C, Sala‐Miquel N, Barquero C, Belda G, García‐del‐Castillo G, García‐Herola A, Penalva JC, Picó M, Poveda M, de‐Vera F, Zapater P, Jover R. Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. United European Gastroenterol J 2024; 12:309-318. [PMID: 38234220 PMCID: PMC11017761 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed after a colonoscopy in which no cancer is found. OBJECTIVE As PCCRC has become an important quality indicator, we determined its rates, characteristics, and index colonoscopy-related predictive factors. METHODS We carried out a multicenter, observational, retrospective study between 2015 and 2018. Rates were calculated for PCCRC developing up to 10 years after colonoscopy. PCCRC was categorized according to the most plausible explanation using World Endoscopy Organization methodology. Our PCCRC population was compared to a control cohort without CRC matched 1:4 by sex, age, index colonoscopy date, indication, endoscopist, and hospital. RESULTS One hundred seven PCCRC and 2508 detected CRC were diagnosed among 101,524 colonoscopy (0.1%), leading to rates of 0.4%, 2.2%, 3.1%, and 4.1% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. PCCRC was in right (42.4%), left (41.4%), and transverse (16.4%) colon with 31.5% at stage I, 24.7% stage II, 32.6% stage III, and 11.2% stage IV. Twenty point three percent were classified as incomplete resection, 5.4% as unresected lesions, 48.6% as missed lesions with adequate colonoscopy, and 25.7% as missed lesions with inadequate colonoscopy. The median time from colonoscopy to PCCRC was 42 months. Previous inadequate preparation (OR 3.05, 95%CI 1.73-5.36) and piecemeal polypectomy (OR 19.89, 95%CI 8.67-45.61) were independently associated with PCCRC. CONCLUSIONS In our population, 4.1% of CRC cases were PCCRC. Most of these lesions were in right colon and attributable to lesions not visualized despite adequate bowel cleansing. Previous inadequate cleansing and piecemeal polypectomy were associated with PCCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Baile‐Maxía
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital General Universitario Dr. BalmisInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL)Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel HernándezAlicanteSpain
| | - Carolina Mangas‐Sanjuan
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital General Universitario Dr. BalmisInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL)Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel HernándezAlicanteSpain
| | - Noelia Sala‐Miquel
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital General Universitario Dr. BalmisInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL)Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel HernándezAlicanteSpain
| | - Claudia Barquero
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital Universitario de TorreviejaTorreviejaSpain
| | - Germán Belda
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital Universitario Vega BajaOrihuelaSpain
| | | | | | | | - María‐Dolores Picó
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital General Universitario de ElcheElcheSpain
| | | | - Félix de‐Vera
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital General Universitario de EldaEldaSpain
| | - Pedro Zapater
- Clinical Pharmacology UnitHospital General Universitario Dr. BalmisInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL)Universidad Miguel HernándezIDIBECIBERehdAlicanteSpain
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Gastroenterology DepartmentHospital General Universitario Dr. BalmisInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL)Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel HernándezAlicanteSpain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sano Y, Hotta K, Matsuda T, Murakami Y, Fujii T, Kudo SE, Oda Y, Ishikawa H, Saito Y, Kobayashi N, Sekiguchi M, Ikematsu H, Katagiri A, Konishi K, Takeuchi Y, Iishi H, Igarashi M, Kobayashi K, Sada M, Osera S, Shinohara T, Yamaguchi Y, Hasuda K, Morishima T, Miyashiro I, Shimoda T, Taniguchi H, Fujimori T, Ajioka Y, Yoshida S. Endoscopic Removal of Premalignant Lesions Reduces Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Risk: Results From the Japan Polyp Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:542-551.e3. [PMID: 37544420 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS To date, no regional evidence of long-term colorectal cancer (CRC) risk reduction after endoscopic premalignant lesion removal has been established. We aimed to analyze this over a long-term follow-up evaluation. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study of participants from the Japan Polyp Study conducted at 11 Japanese institutions. Participants underwent scheduled follow-up colonoscopies after a 2-round baseline colonoscopy process. The primary outcome was CRC incidence after randomization. The observed/expected ratio of CRC was calculated using data from the population-based Osaka Cancer Registry. Secondary outcomes were the incidence and characteristics of advanced neoplasia (AN). RESULTS A total of 1895 participants were analyzed. The mean number of follow-up colonoscopies and the median follow-up period were 2.8 years (range, 1-15 y) and 6.1 years (range, 0.8-11.9 y; 11,559.5 person-years), respectively. Overall, 4 patients (all males) developed CRCs during the study period. The observed/expected ratios for CRC in all participants, males, and females, were as follows: 0.14 (86% reduction), 0.18, and 0, respectively, and 77 ANs were detected in 71 patients (6.1 per 1000 person-years). Of the 77 ANs detected, 31 lesions (40.3%) were laterally spreading tumors, nongranular type. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs), including flat (<10 mm), depressed, and laterally spreading, accounted for 59.7% of all detected ANs. Furthermore, 2 of the 4 CRCs corresponded to T1 NP-CRNs. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic removal of premalignant lesions, including NP-CRNs, effectively reduced CRC risk. More than half of metachronous ANs removed by surveillance colonoscopy were NP-CRNs. The Japan Polyp Study: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry, C000000058; cohort study: UMIN000040731.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Sano
- Gastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Care, Sano Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto, Japan.
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yasushi Oda
- Oda Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Clinic, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nozomu Kobayashi
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Masau Sekiguchi
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Katagiri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Konishi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Iishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Japan
| | - Masahiro Igarashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyonori Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Miwa Sada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shozo Osera
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Shinohara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku, Japan
| | | | - Kiwamu Hasuda
- Hattori Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Clinic, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Isao Miyashiro
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Hirokazu Taniguchi
- Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Division, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Division of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Young E, Rajagopalan A, Tee D, Sathananthan D, Hoile S, Singh R. Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Improves Colonic Adenoma Detection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:338-340.e3. [PMID: 37839498 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
The global burden of colorectal cancer is expected to increase more than 60% by 2030; however, compelling evidence now shows that the implementation of population screening programs in developed countries has led to a substantial reduction in incidence and mortality.1,2 Despite this, patients continue to develop preventable colorectal cancers, in part because of high rates of interval colon cancer diagnosed after screening or surveillance colonoscopies.3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Young
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide.
| | - Arvind Rajagopalan
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australia
| | - Derrick Tee
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
| | - Dharshan Sathananthan
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sophie Hoile
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Djinbachian R, Amar L, Pohl H, Safih W, Bouchard S, Deslandres E, Dorais J, von Renteln D. Local recurrence rates after resection of large colorectal serrated lesions with or without margin thermal ablation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:112-117. [PMID: 37743643 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2257824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serrated lesions (SLs) including traditional serrated adenomas (TSA), large hyperplastic polyps (HP) and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are associated with high incomplete resection rates. Margin ablation combined with EMR (EMR-T) has become routine to reduce local recurrence while cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is becoming recognized as equally effective for large SLs. Our aim was to evaluate local recurrence rates (LRR) and the use of margin ablation in preventing recurrence in a retrospective cohort study. METHODS Patients undergoing resection of ≥15 mm colorectal SLs from 2010-2022 were identified through a pathology database and electronic medical records search. Hereditary CRC syndromes, first follow-up > 18 months or no follow-up, surgical resection were excluded. Primary outcome was LRRs (either histologic or visual) during the first 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were LRRs according to size, and resection technique. RESULTS 191 polyps in 170 patients were resected (59.8% women; mean age, 65 years). The mean size of polyps was 22.4 mm, with 107 (56.0%) ≥20 mm. 99 polyps were resected with EMR, 39 with EMR-T, and 26 with CSP. Mean first surveillance was 8.2 mo. Overall LRR was 18.8% (36/191) (16.8% for ≥20 mm, 17.9% for ≥30 mm). LRR was significantly lower after EMR-T when compared with EMR (5.1% vs. 23.2%; p = 0.013) or CSP (5.1% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.031). There was no difference in LRR between EMR without margin ablation and CSP (p = 0.987). CONCLUSION The local recurrence rate for SLs ≥15 mm is high with 18.8% overall recurrence. EMR with thermal ablation of the margins is superior to both no ablation and CSP in reducing LRRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roupen Djinbachian
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Laetitia Amar
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center, VT, USA
| | - Widad Safih
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Simon Bouchard
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Erik Deslandres
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Judy Dorais
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bobrow TL, Golhar M, Vijayan R, Akshintala VS, Garcia JR, Durr NJ. Colonoscopy 3D video dataset with paired depth from 2D-3D registration. Med Image Anal 2023; 90:102956. [PMID: 37713764 PMCID: PMC10591895 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
Screening colonoscopy is an important clinical application for several 3D computer vision techniques, including depth estimation, surface reconstruction, and missing region detection. However, the development, evaluation, and comparison of these techniques in real colonoscopy videos remain largely qualitative due to the difficulty of acquiring ground truth data. In this work, we present a Colonoscopy 3D Video Dataset (C3VD) acquired with a high definition clinical colonoscope and high-fidelity colon models for benchmarking computer vision methods in colonoscopy. We introduce a novel multimodal 2D-3D registration technique to register optical video sequences with ground truth rendered views of a known 3D model. The different modalities are registered by transforming optical images to depth maps with a Generative Adversarial Network and aligning edge features with an evolutionary optimizer. This registration method achieves an average translation error of 0.321 millimeters and an average rotation error of 0.159 degrees in simulation experiments where error-free ground truth is available. The method also leverages video information, improving registration accuracy by 55.6% for translation and 60.4% for rotation compared to single frame registration. 22 short video sequences were registered to generate 10,015 total frames with paired ground truth depth, surface normals, optical flow, occlusion, six degree-of-freedom pose, coverage maps, and 3D models. The dataset also includes screening videos acquired by a gastroenterologist with paired ground truth pose and 3D surface models. The dataset and registration source code are available at https://durr.jhu.edu/C3VD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor L Bobrow
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Mayank Golhar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Rohan Vijayan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Venkata S Akshintala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Juan R Garcia
- Department of Art as Applied to Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nicholas J Durr
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gonçalves MG, Silva J, Carvalho T, Costa D, Gonçalves R, Rebelo A. Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in a Referral Center for Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence and Risk Factors. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 30:359-367. [PMID: 37868634 PMCID: PMC10586210 DOI: 10.1159/000526126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Background and Aims Colonoscopy is effective to detect and remove colorectal lesions. However, after a negative colonoscopy, cancers could be detected during the interval follow-up. This study was designed to identify characteristics and risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval type. Methods Medical records of individuals who were newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer between January 2018 and December 2019 were reviewed. Clinical, demographic, and endoscopic variables were analyzed. Those with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer between two consecutive colonoscopies performed within the appropriated surveillance range were considered to have postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval type. A comparison between the group of patients with non-postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval type and the group of patients with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval type was then performed. Results During the study period, 491 patients were newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Among them, 61 (12.4%) had postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval subtype. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval type was three times more prevalent on the proximal colon (p = 0.014) and was associated with the presence of two or more cardiovascular risk factors (aOR = 4.25; p = 0.016), cholecystectomy in the past (aOR = 10.09; p = 0.019), and family history of colorectal cancer on a first-degree relative (aOR = 4.25; p = 0.006). Moreover, isolated cardiovascular risk factors revealed a protective effect for the absence of all cardiovascular risk factors (aOR = 20; p = 0.034). The ROC curve associated with the multivariate model revealed a predictive power of 77.8% (p < 0.001). Conclusions Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer - interval type is more common in the proximal colon and in patients with a family history (first-degree relative) of colorectal cancer, two or more cardiovascular risk factors, and a history of cholecystectomy. All of these are easily detectable in clinical practice and may be of extreme importance in the control of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joana Silva
- School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Tânia Carvalho
- Gastroenterology Department, Braga Hospital, Braga, Portugal
| | - Dalila Costa
- Gastroenterology Department, Braga Hospital, Braga, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Rebelo
- Gastroenterology Department, Braga Hospital, Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aziz M, Haghbin H, Gangwani MK, Nawras M, Nawras Y, Dahiya DS, Sohail AH, Lee-Smith W, Kamal F, Shaukat A. 9-Minute Withdrawal Time Improves Adenoma Detection Rate Compared With 6-Minute Withdrawal Time During Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:863-870. [PMID: 37389958 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality metric that has been emphasized by multiple societies as improved ADR leads to reduced interval colorectal cancer (CRC). It is postulated that increased withdrawal time (WT) can lead to higher ADR. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were undertaken to evaluate this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to analyze the impact of higher WT on ADR during colonoscopy. METHODS The following databases were comprehensively searched through November 8, 2022: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Only RCTs were eligible for inclusion. We applied the random effects model using the DerSimonian Laird approach and calculated risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. 95% CI and P values were generated. RESULTS A total of 3 RCTs with 2159 patients were included of which 1136 patients were included in the 9-minute withdrawal group (9WT) and 1023 patients in the 6-minute withdrawal group (6WT). The mean age range was 53.6 to 56.8 years and the male gender was 50.7%. The overall ADR was significantly higher for 9WT (RR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.40; P <0.001). The overall adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) was also higher for the 9WT group (MD: 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25; P =0.008). CONCLUSION The 9-minute withdrawal time improved ADR and APC compared with the 6-minute withdrawal. Given the high-quality evidence, we recommend that clinicians at least perform a 9-minute withdrawal to achieve higher quality metrics including ADR to reduce interval CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hossein Haghbin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ascension Providence Southfield, Southfield
| | | | | | | | - Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, MI
| | | | - Wade Lee-Smith
- University of Toledo Libraries, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
| | - Faisal Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu X, Chen CW, Jaiswal S, Chang TS, Zhang R, Dame MK, Duan Y, Jiang H, Spence JR, Hsieh SY, Wang TD. Near-Infrared Imaging of Colonic Adenomas In Vivo Using Orthotopic Human Organoids for Early Cancer Detection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4795. [PMID: 37835489 PMCID: PMC10571995 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Premalignant lesions that are flat and subtle in morphology are often missed in conventional colonoscopies. Patient-derived adenoma colonoids with high and low cMet expression and normal colonoids were implanted orthotopically in the colon of immunocompromised mice to serve as a preclinical model system. A peptide specific for cMet was labeled with IRDye800, a near-infrared (NIR) fluorophore. This peptide was administered intravenously, and in vivo imaging was performed using a small animal fluorescence endoscope. Quantified intensities showed a peak target-to-background ratio at ~1 h after intravenous peptide injection, and the signal cleared by ~24 h. The peptide was stable in serum with a half-life of 3.6 h. Co-staining of adenoma and normal colonoids showed a high correlation between peptide and anti-cMet antibody. A human-specific cytokeratin stain verified the presence of human tissues implanted among surrounding normal mouse colonic mucosa. Peptide biodistribution was consistent with rapid renal clearance. No signs of acute toxicity were found on either animal necropsy or serum hematology and chemistries. Human colonoids provide a clinically relevant preclinical model to evaluate the specific uptake of a NIR peptide to detect premalignant colonic lesions in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.J.); (M.K.D.); (J.R.S.)
| | - Chun-Wei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan;
| | - Sangeeta Jaiswal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.J.); (M.K.D.); (J.R.S.)
| | - Tse-Shao Chang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Ruoliu Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Michael K. Dame
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.J.); (M.K.D.); (J.R.S.)
| | - Yuting Duan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (Y.D.); (H.J.)
| | - Hui Jiang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (Y.D.); (H.J.)
| | - Jason R. Spence
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.J.); (M.K.D.); (J.R.S.)
| | - Sen-Yung Hsieh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan;
| | - Thomas D. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.J.); (M.K.D.); (J.R.S.)
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kiesslich R, Teubner D, Hoffman A, Rey JW. Retrospective comparison of G-EYE balloon-colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy for increased adenoma detection rate and reduced polyp removal time. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E920-E927. [PMID: 37810901 PMCID: PMC10558257 DOI: 10.1055/a-2005-6934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The newly introduced G-EYE colonoscope (G-EYE) employs a balloon, installed at the bending section of a standard colonoscope (SC), for increasing adenoma detection and stabilizing the colonoscope tip during intervention. This retrospective work explores the effect of introducing G-EYE into an SC endoscopy room, in terms of adenoma detection and polyp removal time. Patients and methods This was a single-center, retrospective study. Historical data from patients who underwent colonoscopy prior to, and following, introduction of G-EYE into a particular endoscopy room were collected and analyzed to determine adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenoma per patient (APP), and polyp removal time (PRT), in each of the SC and G-EYE groups. Results Records of 1362 patients who underwent SC and 1433 subsequent patients who underwent G-EYE colonoscopy in the same endoscopy unit by the same endoscopists were analyzed. Following G-EYE introduction, overall ADR increased by 37.5 % ( P < 0.0001) from 39.2 % to 53.9 %, the serrated adenoma rate increased by 47.3 % from 27.9 % to 41.1 % ( P < 0.0001), and the APP increased by 50.6 % from 0.79 to 1.19 ( P < 0.0001). The number of advanced adenomas increased by 32.7 %, from 19.6 % to 26.0 % of all adenomas ( P < 0.0001). With G-EYE, average PRT was reduced overall by 29.5 % ( P < 0.0001), and particularly for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) by 37.5 % for polyps measuring ≥ 5 mm to ≤ 20 mm ( P < 0.0001) and by 29.4 % for large polyps > 20 mm ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions Introduction of G-EYE to an SC endoscopy room yielded considerable increase in ADR and notable reduction in PRT, particularly with the EMR technique. G-EYE balloon colonoscopy might increase the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy, and can shorten the time of endoscopic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Kiesslich
- Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken (HSK), Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Daniel Teubner
- Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken (HSK), Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Arthur Hoffman
- Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Johannes W. Rey
- Klinikum Osnabrück, Medizinische Klinik III, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Van J, Alsayid M, Ma K, Vemulapalli K, Rex D, Melson J. Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1410-1418. [PMID: 37040556 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Polypectomy technique, for diminutive lesion resection, is variable among colonoscopists using either cold snare polypectomy (CSP) or cold forceps polypectomy (CFP). While it is well described that CSP is a preferred technique to resect small lesions, there is little data evaluating the impact resection techniques have on metachronous adenoma burden. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of incomplete resection attributable to CSP and CFP of diminutive adenomas. METHODS This is a 2-center retrospective cohort study evaluating the segmental incomplete resection rate (S-IRR) of diminutive tubular adenomas (TA). S-IRR was calculated by subtracting the segmental metachronous adenoma rate in a specific colonic segment without adenoma from segments with adenoma on index colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the S-IRR of diminutive TA resected by CSP or CFP on index colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 1,504 patients were included in the analysis: 1,235 with TA <6 mm and 269 with TA 6-9 mm as the most advanced lesion. The S-IRR in a segment that had a <6-mm TA incompletely resected by CFP on index colonoscopy was 13%. The S-IRR in a segment that had a <6-mm TA incompletely resected by CSP was 0%. Among 12 included colonoscopists, the range of overall S-IRR was 1.1%-24.4% with an average S-IRR of 10.3%. DISCUSSION S-IRR was 13% higher with CFP resection of diminutive TA than with CSP. A proposed S-IRR metric of <5% is a target goal for all diminutive polyp resection because 3/12 colonoscopists achieved this low rate. S-IRR can be used as a methodology to compare and quantify the difference in segmental metachronous adenoma burden across various polypectomy removal methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Van
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Muhammad Alsayid
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karen Ma
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Krishna Vemulapalli
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Douglas Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garrido A, Guardiola M, Neira LM, Sont R, Córdova H, Cuatrecasas M, Flisikowski K, Troya J, Sanahuja J, Winogrodzki T, Belda I, Meining A, Fernández-Esparrach G. Preclinical Evaluation of a Microwave-Based Accessory Device for Colonoscopy in an In Vivo Porcine Model with Colorectal Polyps. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3122. [PMID: 37370732 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colonoscopy is currently the most effective way of detecting colorectal cancer and removing polyps, but it has some drawbacks and can miss up to 22% of polyps. Microwave imaging has the potential to provide a 360° view of the colon and addresses some of the limitations of conventional colonoscopy. This study evaluates the feasibility of a microwave-based colonoscopy in an in vivo porcine model. METHODS A prototype device with microwave antennas attached to a conventional endoscope was tested on four healthy pigs and three gene-targeted pigs with mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. The first four animals were used to evaluate safety and maneuverability and compatibility with endoscopic tools. The ability to detect polyps was tested in a series of three gene-targeted pigs. RESULTS the microwave-based device did not affect endoscopic vision or cause any adverse events such as deep mural injuries. The microwave system was stable during the procedures, and the detection algorithm showed a maximum detection signal for adenomas compared with healthy mucosa. CONCLUSIONS Microwave-based colonoscopy is feasible and safe in a preclinical model, and it has the potential to improve polyp detection. Further investigations are required to assess the device's efficacy in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Henry Córdova
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network on Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Biomedical Research Network on Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Krzysztof Flisikowski
- Lehrstuhl für Biotechnologie der Nutztiere, School of Life Sciences, Technische Universität München, 80333 München, Germany
| | - Joel Troya
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Josep Sanahuja
- Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thomas Winogrodzki
- Lehrstuhl für Biotechnologie der Nutztiere, School of Life Sciences, Technische Universität München, 80333 München, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Meining
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Glòria Fernández-Esparrach
- MiWEndo Solutions S.L., 08014 Barcelona, Spain
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network on Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lamba M, Khaing MM, Ma X, Ryan K, Appleyard M, Leggett B, Grimpen F. Post-colonoscopy cancer rate at a tertiary referral hospital in Australia: A data linkage analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:740-746. [PMID: 36436544 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed following a cancer-negative colonoscopy is termed as post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). The World Endoscopy Organization has recently standardized the definition of PCCRC-3Y (CRC developing within 3 years of a cancer-negative colonoscopy). In the present study, we sought to assess PCCRC-3Y rate, perform root-cause analyses, and identify factors associated with development of PCCRC at a tertiary referral hospital in Australia. METHODS All patients undergoing colonoscopy from 2011 to 2018 were matched to a population-based cancer register. PCCRC-3Y rate was assessed for years 2011-2015. All PCCRC cases that developed within 6-48 months after a cancer-negative colonoscopy underwent root-cause analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. RESULTS Among 17 828 patients undergoing colonoscopy, 367 CRC cases were diagnosed during the study period. This included nine PCCRC cases, which developed at a median of 14 months (range 7-34 months) after cancer-negative colonoscopy. The PCCRC-3Y rate for years 2011-2015 was 2.16% (95% CI 0.91-5.15). All nine PCCRC cases were moderately or poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas; seven of nine were early-stage CRC (stages I and II) and six of nine probably represented missed lesions at index colonoscopy despite an apparently adequate examination. History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (odds ratio [OR] 21.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-103.7, P < 0.001) and diverticulosis (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.4-20.5, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with development of missed CRC. CONCLUSIONS In our tertiary referral colonoscopy cohort, PCCRC-3Y rate was 2.16% (95% CI 0.91-5.15). IBD and diverticulosis were significantly associated with risk of PCCRC. The majority of PCCRC lesions were likely missed at index colonoscopy, despite an apparently adequate examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehul Lamba
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Myat Myat Khaing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Xiaomin Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kimberley Ryan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mark Appleyard
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Barbara Leggett
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Florian Grimpen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Motchum L, Djinbachian R, Rahme E, Taghiakbari M, Bouchard S, Bouin M, Sidani S, Deslandres É, Takla M, Frija-Gruman NM, Barkun A, von Renteln D. Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E480-E489. [PMID: 37206693 PMCID: PMC10191736 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-2392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Incomplete resection of 4- to 20-mm colorectal polyps occur frequently (> 10 %), putting patients at risk for post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that routine use of wide-field cold snare resection with submucosal injection (CSP-SI) might reduce incomplete resection rates (IRRs). Patients and methods Patients aged 45 to 80 years undergoing elective colonoscopies were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. All 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated polyps were resected using CSP-SI. Post-polypectomy margin biopsies were obtained to determine IRRs through histopathology assessment. The primary outcome was IRR, defined as remnant polyp tissue found on margin biopsies. Secondary outcomes included technical success and complication rates. Results A total of 429 patients (median age 65 years, 47.1 % female, adenoma detection rate 40 %) with 204 non-pedunculated colorectal polyps 4 to 20 mm removed using CSP-SI were included in the final analysis. CSP-SI was technical successful in 97.5 % (199/204) of cases (5 conversion to hot snare polypectomy). IRR for CSP-SI was 3.8 % (7/183) (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7 %-5.5 %). IRR was 1.6 % (2/129), 16 % (4/25), and 3.4 % (1/29) for adenomas, serrated lesions, and hyperplastic polyps respectively. IRR was 2.3 % (2/87), 6.3 % (4/64), 4.0 % (6/151), and 3.1 % (1/32) for polyps 4 to 5 mm, 6 to 9 mm, < 10 mm, and 10 to 20 mm, respectively. There were no CSP-SI-related serious adverse events. Conclusions Use of CSP-SI results in lower IRRs compared to what has previously been reported in the literature for hot or cold snare polypectomy when not using wide-field cold snare resection with submucosal injection. CSP-SI showed an excellent safety and efficacy profile, however comparative studies to CSP without SI are required to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Motchum
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roupen Djinbachian
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Elham Rahme
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Simon Bouchard
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mickaël Bouin
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Sacha Sidani
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Érik Deslandres
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mark Takla
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shahini E, Sinagra E, Vitello A, Ranaldo R, Contaldo A, Facciorusso A, Maida M. Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1685-1707. [PMID: 37077514 PMCID: PMC10107216 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Adequate bowel cleansing is critical for a high-quality colonoscopy because it affects diagnostic accuracy and adenoma detection. Nevertheless, almost a quarter of procedures are still carried out with suboptimal preparation, resulting in longer procedure times, higher risk of complications, and higher likelihood of missing lesions. Current guidelines recommend high-volume or low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG)/non-PEG-based split-dose regimens. In patients who have had insufficient bowel cleansing, the colonoscopy should be repeated the same day or the next day with additional bowel cleansing as a salvage option. A strategy that includes a prolonged low-fiber diet, a split preparation regimen, and a colonoscopy within 5 h of the end of preparation may increase cleansing success rates in the elderly. Furthermore, even though no specific product is specifically recommended in the other cases for difficult-to-prepare patients, clinical evidence suggests that 1-L PEG plus ascorbic acid preparation are associated with higher cleansing success in hospitalized and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) should be prepared with isotonic high volume PEG solutions. Few data on cirrhotic patients are currently available, and no trials have been conducted in this population. An accurate characterization of procedural and patient variables may lead to a more personalized approach to bowel preparation, especially in patients undergoing resection of left colon lesions, where intestinal preparation has a poor outcome. The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence on the risk factors influencing the quality of bowel cleansing in difficult-to-prepare patients, as well as strategies to improve colonoscopy preparation in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Endrit Shahini
- Gastroenterology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology-IRCCS “Saverio de Bellis”, Castellana Grotte, Bari 70013, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù 90015, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vitello
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S.Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta 93100, Italy
| | - Rocco Ranaldo
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Mazzolani-Vandini” Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy, Ferrara 744011, Italy
| | - Antonella Contaldo
- Gastroenterology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology “S de Bellis” Research Hospital, Bari 70013, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Section of Gastroenterology, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S.Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta 93100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:233-254. [PMID: 36856579 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 662] [Impact Index Per Article: 662.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society provides an update of CRC statistics based on incidence from population-based cancer registries and mortality from the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, approximately 153,020 individuals will be diagnosed with CRC and 52,550 will die from the disease, including 19,550 cases and 3750 deaths in individuals younger than 50 years. The decline in CRC incidence slowed from 3%-4% annually during the 2000s to 1% annually during 2011-2019, driven partly by an increase in individuals younger than 55 years of 1%-2% annually since the mid-1990s. Consequently, the proportion of cases among those younger than 55 years increased from 11% in 1995 to 20% in 2019. Incidence since circa 2010 increased in those younger than 65 years for regional-stage disease by about 2%-3% annually and for distant-stage disease by 0.5%-3% annually, reversing the overall shift to earlier stage diagnosis that occurred during 1995 through 2005. For example, 60% of all new cases were advanced in 2019 versus 52% in the mid-2000s and 57% in 1995, before widespread screening. There is also a shift to left-sided tumors, with the proportion of rectal cancer increasing from 27% in 1995 to 31% in 2019. CRC mortality declined by 2% annually from 2011-2020 overall but increased by 0.5%-3% annually in individuals younger than 50 years and in Native Americans younger than 65 years. In summary, despite continued overall declines, CRC is rapidly shifting to diagnosis at a younger age, at a more advanced stage, and in the left colon/rectum. Progress against CRC could be accelerated by uncovering the etiology of rising incidence in generations born since 1950 and increasing access to high-quality screening and treatment among all populations, especially Native Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nikita Sandeep Wagle
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Melson J. Monitoring colonoscopy screening program quality at the provider level, the institution level, and beyond. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:130-131. [PMID: 36371237 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Melson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona-Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Sehner S, Rösch T, Aschenbeck J, Schröder A, Schubert S, Liceni T, Aminalai A, Spitz W, Möhler U, Heller F, Berndt R, Bartel-Kowalski C, Niemax K, Burmeister W, Schachschal G. Second-generation distal attachment cuff for adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy: a randomized multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:112-120. [PMID: 36030888 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Randomized studies have demonstrated that a distal attachment cap with rubber side arms, the Endocuff Vision (ECV; Olympus America, Center Valley, Pa, USA), increased colonoscopic adenoma detection rate (ADR) in various mixed patient collectives. This is the first study to evaluate its use in a primary colonoscopic screening program. METHODS Patients over age 55 years undergoing screening colonoscopy in 9 German private offices in Berlin and Hamburg were randomized to either the study group using ECV or the control group using high-definition colonoscopies (standard of care). The main outcome parameter was ADR, whereas secondary outcomes were detection rates of all adenomas per colonoscopy (APCs), of adenoma subgroups, and of hyperplastic polyps. RESULTS Of 1416 patients (mean age, 61.1 years; 51.8% women), with a median of 41 examinations per examiner (n = 23; interquartile range, 12-81), 700 were examined with ECV and 716 without. Adjusting for the effects of the colonoscopies, ADR was 39.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.6%-46.3%) in the ECV group versus 32.2% (95% CI, 25.9%-38.6%) in the control group, which resulted in an increase of 7.2% (95% CI, 2.3%-12.2%; P = .004). The increase in ADR was mainly because of small polyps, with adjusted ADRs for adenomas <10 mm of 33.3% (95% CI, 26.5%-40.2%) for study patients versus 24.0% (95% CI, 18.2%-29.8%) for control patients (P < .001). APC was also significantly increased (.57 ECV vs .51 control subjects, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS A distal attachment cap with side arms significantly increased the ADR in patients undergoing primary colonoscopic screening. Because of the correlation of ADR and interval cancer, its use should be encouraged, especially in this setting. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03442738.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susanne Sehner
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Guido Schachschal
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Young EJ, Rajandran A, Philpott HL, Sathananthan D, Hoile SF, Singh R. Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:6632-6661. [PMID: 36620337 PMCID: PMC9813932 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
An expanding range of advanced mucosal imaging technologies have been developed with the goal of improving the detection and characterization of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Many technologies have targeted colorectal neoplasia given the potential for intervention prior to the development of invasive cancer in the setting of widespread surveillance programs. Improvement in adenoma detection reduces miss rates and prevents interval cancer development. Advanced imaging technologies aim to enhance detection without significantly increasing procedural time. Accurate polyp characterisation guides resection techniques for larger polyps, as well as providing the platform for the “resect and discard” and “do not resect” strategies for small and diminutive polyps. This review aims to collate and summarise the evidence regarding these technologies to guide colonoscopic practice in both interventional and non-interventional endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward John Young
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Arvinf Rajandran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hamish Lachlan Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dharshan Sathananthan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sophie Fenella Hoile
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yang K, Cao Y, Gurjao C, Liu Y, Guo CG, Lo CH, Zong X, Drew D, Geraghty C, Prezioso E, Moore M, Williams C, Riley T, Saul M, Ogino S, Giannakis M, Bass A, Schoen RE, Chan AT. Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Interval Colorectal Cancer in 3 Prospective Cohorts. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:1522-1530.e5. [PMID: 35970241 PMCID: PMC9691567 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Interval colorectal cancers (CRCs), cancers diagnosed after a screening/surveillance examination in which no cancer is detected, and before the date of next recommended examination, reflect an unprecedented challenge in CRC detection and prevention. To better understand this poorly characterized CRC variant, we examined the clinical and mutational characteristics of interval CRCs in comparison with screen detected CRCs. METHODS We included 1175 CRCs documented in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial and 3661 CRCs in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). Multivariable Cox models were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of death risk. Whole exome sequencing was conducted in 147 PLCO cases and 796 NHS/HPFS cases. RESULTS A total of 619 deaths (312 CRC-specific) and 2404 deaths (1904 CRC-specific) were confirmed during follow-up of PLCO and NHS/HPFS, respectively. Compared with screen detected CRCs, interval CRCs had a multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) of 1.47 (1.21-1.78) for CRC-specific mortality and 1.27 (1.09-1.47) for overall mortality (meta-analysis combining all 3 cohorts). However, we did not observe significant differences in mutational features between interval and screen detected CRCs (false discovery rate adjusted P > .05). CONCLUSION Interval CRCs had a significantly increased risk of death compared with screen detected CRCs that were not explained by established clinical prognostic factors, including stage at diagnosis. The survival disadvantage of interval CRCs did not appear to be explained by differences in the genomic landscape of tumors characterized by whole exome sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keming Yang
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yin Cao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Carino Gurjao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yang Liu
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Chuan-Guo Guo
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chun-Han Lo
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiaoyu Zong
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Drew
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Connor Geraghty
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Prezioso
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matt Moore
- Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, Maryland
| | - Craig Williams
- Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, Maryland
| | - Tom Riley
- Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, Maryland
| | - Melissa Saul
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Adam Bass
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center and Center for Precision Cancer Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, and Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Khan R, Vaska M, Ruan Y, Bansal R, Gimpaya N, Scaffidi MA, Brenner D, Leontiadis GI, Grover SC, Forbes N. Interventions to improve the quality of screening-related colonoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061855. [PMID: 36424103 PMCID: PMC9693885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colonoscopy quality can vary depending on endoscopist-related factors. Quality indicators, such as adenoma detection rate (ADR), have been adopted to reduce variations in care. Several interventions aim to improve ADR, but these fall into several domains that have traditionally been difficult to compare. We will conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacies of interventions to improve colonoscopy quality and report our findings according to clinically relevant interventional domains. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Evidence-Based Medicine from inception to September 2022. Four reviewers will screen for eligibility and abstract data in parallel, with two accordant entries establishing agreement and with any discrepancies resolved by consensus. The primary outcome will be ADR. Two authors will independently conduct risk of bias assessments. The analyses of the network will be conducted under a Bayesian random-effects model using Markov-chain Monte-Carlo simulation, with 10 000 burn-ins and 100 000 iterations. We will calculate the ORs and corresponding 95% credible intervals of network estimates with a consistency model. We will report the impact of specific interventions within each domain against standard colonoscopy. We will perform a Bayesian random-effects pairwise meta-analysis to assess heterogeneity based on the I2 statistic. We will assess the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework for network meta-analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Our study does not require research ethics approval given the lack of patient-specific data being collected. The results will be disseminated at national and international gastroenterology conferences and peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021291814.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishad Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus Vaska
- Knowledge Resource Service, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rishi Bansal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nikko Gimpaya
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Darren Brenner
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - G I Leontiadis
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir C Grover
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shanahan JJ, LeBlanc DM, Courage ER, Benesch MGK, Hickey KE, Hartwig KA, Armstrong CD, Engelbrecht R, Fagan MG, Borgaonkar MR, Pace DE. Characteristics of Interval Colorectal Cancer: A Canadian Retrospective Population-Level Analysis from Newfoundland and Labrador. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9150-9162. [PMID: 36547130 PMCID: PMC9776431 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Interval colorectal cancers (I-CRCs) arise during the interval time period between scheduled colonoscopies. Predicting which patients are at risk of I-CRCs remains an elusive undertaking, but evidence would suggest that most I-CRCs arise from lesions missed on index endoscopy. The procedural factors that lead to missed lesions are numerous and lack consensus in the literature. In Canada, the province of Newfoundland and Labrador has the highest incidence of CRCs. In this study our aim was to examine I-CRCs (3-60 months after last colonoscopy) in NL through a population-level analysis covering 67% of the province from 2001-2018. We estimated the I-CRC rate to be up to 9.3%. Median age of I-CRC diagnosis was 67.1 years with an interval time of 2.9 years. About 57% of these tumors occurred proximal to the splenic flexure, with 53% presenting as local disease. No temporal differences were observed in interval time or tumor distribution. On univariate and multivariable logistical regression, risk of right-sided I-CRC did not correlate to the index colonoscopy indication, bowel preparation quality, size of largest polyp removed, colonoscopy completion rate, or stage at presentation. Improvements in synoptic reporting utilization and national registries are needed to identity risk factors and reduce I-CRC frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J. Shanahan
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Danielle M. LeBlanc
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Emily R. Courage
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Matthew G. K. Benesch
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Kala E. Hickey
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Katia A. Hartwig
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Casey D. Armstrong
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Reniel Engelbrecht
- Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Mitchell G. Fagan
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Mark R. Borgaonkar
- Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - David E. Pace
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Liang M, Zhang X, Xu C, Cao J, Zhang Z. Anesthesia Assistance in Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:872231. [PMID: 35911411 PMCID: PMC9326494 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.872231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAdenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR) are both indicators for colonoscopy quality. Improving ADR or PDR is critical for reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). Although several studies have focused on identifying the factors that may influence ADR or PDR, the evidence remains limited and inconclusive. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effect of anesthesia assistance (AA) on ADR or PDR in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening and identify risk factors affecting ADR or PDR.MethodsWe reviewed electronic medical records of patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between May 2019 and August 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received AA: patients in Group A underwent colonoscopy screening with AA, whereas patients in Group O underwent colonoscopy screening without AA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to account for differences in baseline characteristics. After, ADR and PDR were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors that affected ADR or PDR.ResultsOf 9432 patients who underwent colonoscopy examination during the study period, 7170 were included in the final analyses (Group A = 5756 and Group O = 1414). After PSM, 736 patients remained in each group for analyses. There was no significant difference between groups A and O (P > 0.05) in ADR or PDR. Binary logistic regression indicated that the endoscopic device version (Olympus HQ290), equipment image-based technique and number of images were independent risk factors that affected ADR, and the age (50–59 years and 60–69 years), gender (male), high-risk status, endoscopist seniority (senior endoscopist), equipment image-based technique and number of images were all independent risk factors that affected PDR.ConclusionsWe discovered that AA does not affect ADR or PDR. Despite improved patient satisfaction, using AA is unnecessary for improving colonoscopy quality. Endoscopists should consider all these factors as much as possible when performing colonoscopy screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Liang
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia Application Technology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Xinyan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Chunhong Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Junli Cao
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia Application Technology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Zongwang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
- *Correspondence: Zongwang Zhang
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fudman DI, Singal AG, Cooper MG, Lee M, Murphy CC. Prevalence of Forceps Polypectomy of Nondiminutive Polyps Is Substantial But Modifiable. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1508-1515. [PMID: 34839039 PMCID: PMC9133266 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The use of forceps for removal of nondiminutive polyps is associated with incomplete resection compared with snare polypectomy. However, few studies have characterized the frequency of forceps polypectomy for nondiminutive polyps or identified strategies to improve this practice. To address this gap, we estimated the prevalence and predictors of forceps polypectomy in clinical practice and examined the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to reduce inappropriate forceps polypectomy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all colonoscopies with polypectomies performed at 2 U.S. health systems between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019. We used a mixed-effects logistic regression model to examine the effect of a multicomponent intervention, including provider education and a financial incentive, to reduce inappropriate forceps polypectomy, defined as use of forceps polypectomy for polyps ≥5 mm. RESULTS A total of 9968 colonoscopies with 25,534 polypectomies were performed by 42 gastroenterologists during the study period. Overall, 8.5% (n = 2176) of polyps were removed with inappropriate forceps polypectomy. Inappropriate forceps polypectomy significantly decreased after the intervention (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.39), from 11.4% (n = 1539) to 5.3% (n = 637). Predictors of inappropriate forceps polypectomy included inadequate bowel prep (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.47), polyps in the right colon (vs left: OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.51), and number of polyps removed (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Inappropriate forceps polypectomy also varied by gastroenterologist (median OR, 3.43). In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of polyps >2 mm removed with forceps decreased from 50.0% before the intervention to 43.0% after it (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68). CONCLUSIONS Inappropriate forceps polypectomy is common but modifiable. The proportion of nondiminutive polyps removed with forceps polypectomy should be considered as a quality measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I. Fudman
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Mark G. Cooper
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - MinJae Lee
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Caitlin C. Murphy
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
MiWEndo: Evaluation of a Microwave Colonoscopy Algorithm for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection in Ex Vivo Human Colon Models. SENSORS 2022; 22:s22134902. [PMID: 35808397 PMCID: PMC9269828 DOI: 10.3390/s22134902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
This study assesses the efficacy of detecting colorectal cancer precursors or polyps in an ex vivo human colon model with a microwave colonoscopy algorithm. Nowadays, 22% of polyps go undetected with conventional colonoscopy, and the risk of cancer after a negative colonoscopy can be up to 7.9%. We developed a microwave colonoscopy device that consists of a cylindrical ring-shaped switchable microwave antenna array that can be attached to the tip of a conventional colonoscope as an accessory. The accessory is connected to an external unit that allows successive measurements of the colon and processes the measurements with a microwave imaging algorithm. An acoustic signal is generated when a polyp is detected. Fifteen ex vivo freshly excised human colons with cancer (n = 12) or polyps (n = 3) were examined with the microwave-assisted colonoscopy system simulating a real colonoscopy exploration. After the experiment, the dielectric properties of the specimens were measured with a coaxial probe and the samples underwent a pathology analysis. The results show that all the neoplasms were detected with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87.4%.
Collapse
|
36
|
Troelsen FS, Sørensen HT, Crockett SD, Pedersen L, Erichsen R. Characteristics and Survival of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e984-e1005. [PMID: 34051380 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) account for up to 50% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We investigated characteristics of IBD patients with PCCRC and their survival. METHODS We identified IBD patients (ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease) diagnosed with CRC from 1995 to 2015. We defined PCCRC as diagnosed between 6 and 36 months, and detected CRC (dCRC) as diagnosed within 6 months after colonoscopy. We computed prevalence ratios comparing PCCRC vs dCRC and followed up patients from the diagnosis of PCCRC/dCRC until death, emigration, or study end. Mortality was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for sex, age, year of CRC diagnosis, and stage. The main analyses focused on patients with UC. RESULTS Among 23,738 UC patients undergoing colonoscopy, we identified 352 patients with CRC, of whom 103 (29%) had PCCRC. Compared with dCRC, PCCRC was associated with a higher prevalence of metastatic cancer (33% vs 20%; prevalence ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.38), cancers showing mismatch repair deficiency (79% vs 56%; prevalence ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.13-1.72), and proximally located cancers (54% vs 40%; prevalence ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.69). The 1- and 5-year adjusted hazard ratios of death for PCCRC vs dCRC among UC patients were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.77-2.18) and 1.24 (95% CI, 0.86-1.79), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of UC-related PCCRC suggest tumor biology as an important factor in the progression to cancer. However, the prognosis of PCCRC appears similar to that of dCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henrik T Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lars Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cheung KS, Chan EW, Tam A, Wong IOL, Seto WK, Hung IFN, Wong ICK, Leung WK. Association between antibiotic consumption and colon and rectal cancer development in older individuals: A territory-wide study. Cancer Med 2022; 11:3863-3872. [PMID: 35488387 PMCID: PMC9582694 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antibiotics may alter colorectal cancer (CRC) risk due to gut dysbiosis. We aimed to study the specific and temporal effects of various antibiotics on CRC development in older individuals. Methods This was a territory‐wide retrospective cohort study. Subjects aged 60 years and older who did not have CRC diagnosed on screening/diagnostic colonoscopy diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 were recruited. Exclusion criteria were history of CRC, colectomy, inflammatory bowel disease, and CRC diagnosed within 6 months of index colonoscopy. Exposure was use of any antibiotics up to 5 years before colonoscopy. The primary outcomes were CRC diagnosed >6 m after colonoscopy. Covariates were patient demographics, history of colonic polyps/polypectomy, concomitant medication use (NSAIDs, COX‐2 inhibitors, aspirin, and statins), and performance of endoscopy centers (colonoscopy volume and polypectomy rate). Stratified analysis was conducted according to nature of antibiotics and location of cancer. Results Ninety seven thousand one hundred and sixty‐two eligible subjects (with 1026 [1.0%] cases of CRC) were identified, 58,704 (60.4%) of whom were exposed to antibiotics before index colonoscopy. Use of antibiotics was associated with a lower risk of cancer in rectum (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54–0.76), but a higher risk of cancer in proximal colon (aHR: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.15–2.32). These effects differed as regards the anti‐anaerobic/anti‐aerobic activity, narrow‐/broad‐spectrum, and administration route of antibiotics. Conclusions Antibiotics had divergent effects on CRC development in older subjects, which varied according to the location of cancer, antibiotic class, and administration route.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Shing Cheung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong.,Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong&Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Esther W Chan
- Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong
| | - Anthony Tam
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong
| | - Irene O L Wong
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong
| | - Wai Kay Seto
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong.,Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong&Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ivan F N Hung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong
| | - Ian C K Wong
- Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong.,UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wai K Leung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lam AY, Duloy AM, Keswani RN. Quality Indicators for the Detection and Removal of Colorectal Polyps and Interventions to Improve Them. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:329-349. [PMID: 35361339 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Modifiable risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer include suboptimal lesion detection (missed neoplasms) and inadequate lesion removal (incomplete polypectomy) during colonoscopy. Competent detection and removal of colorectal polyps are thus fundamental to ensuring adequate colonoscopy quality. Several well-researched quality metrics for polyp detection have been implemented into clinical practice, chief among these the adenoma detection rate. Less data are available on quality indicators for polyp removal, which currently include complete resection rates and skills assessment tools. This review summarizes the available literature on quality indicators for the detection and removal of colorectal polyps, as well as interventions to improve them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Y Lam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, 2350 Geary Boulevard, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Anna M Duloy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North Street, Clair, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Patient Selection, Risks, and Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Colorectal Polyp Resection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:351-370. [PMID: 35361340 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The 2 most significant complications of colonoscopy with polypectomy are bleeding and perforation. Although the incidence rates are generally low (<1%), these can be avoided by recognizing pertinent risk factors, which can be patient, polyp, and technique/device related. Endoscopists should be equipped to manage bleeding and perforation. Currently available devices and techniques to achieve hemostasis and manage colon perforations are reviewed.
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang QW, Wang XY, Zhang QW, Chen JN, Zhou YJ, Tang ZR, Wang RL, Chen H, Chen H, Li XB. ERBB2 Mutations as Potential Predictors for Recurrence in Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing. Front Oncol 2022; 12:769709. [PMID: 35402217 PMCID: PMC8984468 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.769709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundFollow-up guidelines for serrated polyps (SPs) are mainly based on factors such as histology and size with limited evidence. The underlying genomic mechanism of SPs in relation to recurrence risks is utterly unknown.MethodsWe applied targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach on two groups of SPs [polyp-relapsed SPs (PRSPs) vs. polyp-free SPs (PFSPs)] based on the surveillance outcomes to compare differences of DNA variants in 71 colorectal cancer-associated genes. A multicenter validation cohort was established longitudinally from 2016 to 2019 to confirm the relevant results.ResultsAmong the 96 NGS samples, at least one mutant after filtration was detected in 90 samples (94%). Molecular profiling presented BRAF, KRAS, and APC as top 3 mutated genes. FBXW7, MSH2, and ERBB2 might be recurrence-relevant, while DMD, BRCA1, and BRCA2 might be negatively correlated with recurrence. Notably, ERBB2 mutants (R678Q and V842I) (n = 5) had higher risks of polyp recurrence than the wild types (n = 85), with a median polyp-free interval of 15 months compared to 26 months [P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) = 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.9–12.8]. Furthermore, a multicenter cohort composed by 321 SPs verified that ERBB2-mutated SPs had increased risks of polyp recurrence (P < 0.001; HR = 3.7; 95% CI = 2.3–6.0) and advanced neoplastic lesion (ANL) recurrence (P < 0.001; HR = 10.0; 95% CI = 2.7–36.9) compared with wild-type SPs, respectively.ConclusionsOur results are emphasizing that SP individuals with ERBB2 mutants are at higher risks of subsequent colorectal neoplasms. ERBB2 mutants might work as facilitated markers for prediction of high-risk SPs and might implicate a potential mechanism in the serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma (CRC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Wen Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin-Yuan Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing-Wei Zhang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin-Nan Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Jie Zhou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhao-Rong Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Rui-Lan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sichuan Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Forces, Leshan, China
| | - Haoyan Chen
- State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huimin Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xiao-Bo Li, ; Huimin Chen,
| | - Xiao-Bo Li
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xiao-Bo Li, ; Huimin Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Microwave-Based Colonoscopy: Preclinical Evaluation in an Ex Vivo Human Colon Model. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2022; 2022:9522737. [PMID: 35126510 PMCID: PMC8816597 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9522737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Microwave imaging can obtain 360° anatomical and functional images of the colon representing the existing contrast in dielectric properties between different tissues. Microwaves are safe (nonionizing) and have the potential of reducing the visualization problems of conventional colonoscopy. This study assessed the efficacy of a microwave-based colonoscopy device to detect neoplastic lesions in an ex vivo human colon model. Methods Fresh surgically excised colorectal specimens containing cancer or polyps were fixed to a 3D positioning system, and the accessory device was introduced horizontally inside the ex vivo colon lumen and moved along it simulating a real colonoscopy exploration. Measurements of the colon were taken every 4 mm with the microwave-based colonoscopy device and processed with a microwave imaging algorithm. Results 14 ex vivo human colorectal specimens with carcinomas (n = 11) or adenomas with high grade dysplasia (n = 3) were examined with a microwave-based device. Using a detection threshold of 2.79 for the dielectric property contrast, all lesions were detected without false positives or false negatives. Conclusions This study demonstrates the use of a microwave-based device to be used as an accessory of a standard colonoscope to detect neoplastic lesions in surgically excised colorectal specimens.
Collapse
|
42
|
van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Dekker E. Current Approaches in Managing Colonic Serrated Polyps and Serrated Polyposis. Annu Rev Med 2022; 73:293-306. [PMID: 35084990 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042220-024703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
For decades, conventional adenomas were the only known precursor lesions of colorectal cancer (CRC). Accordingly, education and research regarding CRC prevention were mainly focused on adenomas. The groundbreaking discovery that serrated polyps (SPs) also have the potential to develop into CRCs, and seem to account for a considerable proportion of sporadic CRCs, has led to a paradigm shift in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC. Studies in recent years have led to our current understanding of SPs and associated CRC, but a lot of work is still to be done to further improve knowledge about this serrated neoplasia pathway and the clinical management of SPs and serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS). In this review, we reflect on the current understanding of SPs with respect to terminology, detection, resection, and surveillance and reflect on the management of SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; , ,
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; , ,
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ahmad A, Dhillon A, Saunders BP, Kabir M, Thomas-Gibson S. Validation of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) cases reported at national level following local root cause analysis: REFLECT study. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 13:374-380. [PMID: 36051952 PMCID: PMC9380767 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-102016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine aetiology of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) identified from population-based data through local root cause analysis at a high-volume mixed secondary and tertiary referral centre. DESIGN/METHOD A subset of national cancer registration data, collected by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, was used to determine PCCRCs diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 at our centre.Root cause analysis was performed for each identified PCCRC, using World Endoscopy Organisation recommendations, to validate it and assess most plausible explanation. We also assessed whether patient, clinician and/or service factors were primarily responsible. RESULTS Of 107 'PCCRC' cases provided from the national dataset, 20 were excluded (16 missing data, 4 duplicates). 87 'PCCRC' cases were included of which 58 were true PCCRCs and 29 false PCCRCs.False PCCRCs comprised 17 detected cancers (cancer diagnosed within 6 months of negative colonoscopy) and 12 cases did not meet PCCRC criteria. Inflammatory bowel disease was the most common risk factor (18/58) and the most common site was rectum (19/58). The most common explanation was 'possible missed lesion, prior examination negative but inadequate' (23/58) and clinician factors were primarily responsible for PCCRC occurrence in most cases (37/58). CONCLUSION Our single-centre study shows, after local analysis, there was misclassification of PCCRCs identified from a population-based registry. The degree of such error will vary between registries. Most PCCRCs occurred in cases of sub-optimal examination as indicated by poor photodocumentation. Effective mechanisms to feedback root cause analyses are critical for quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmir Ahmad
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, London, UK
| | - Angad Dhillon
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, London, UK
| | | | - Misha Kabir
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Taghiakbari M, Mori Y, von Renteln D. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: A review of current state of practice and research. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:8103-8122. [PMID: 35068857 PMCID: PMC8704267 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i47.8103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy is an effective screening procedure in colorectal cancer prevention programs; however, colonoscopy practice can vary in terms of lesion detection, classification, and removal. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision support systems for endoscopy is an area of rapid research and development. The systems promise improved detection, classification, screening, and surveillance for colorectal polyps and cancer. Several recently developed applications for AI-assisted colonoscopy have shown promising results for the detection and classification of colorectal polyps and adenomas. However, their value for real-time application in clinical practice has yet to be determined owing to limitations in the design, validation, and testing of AI models under real-life clinical conditions. Despite these current limitations, ambitious attempts to expand the technology further by developing more complex systems capable of assisting and supporting the endoscopist throughout the entire colonoscopy examination, including polypectomy procedures, are at the concept stage. However, further work is required to address the barriers and challenges of AI integration into broader colonoscopy practice, to navigate the approval process from regulatory organizations and societies, and to support physicians and patients on their journey to accepting the technology by providing strong evidence of its accuracy and safety. This article takes a closer look at the current state of AI integration into the field of colonoscopy and offers suggestions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Department of Gastroenterology, CRCHUM, Montreal H2X 0A9, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yuichi Mori
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo 0450, Norway
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama 224-8503, Japan
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Department of Gastroenterology, CRCHUM, Montreal H2X 0A9, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shiu SI, Kashida H, Komeda Y. The prevalence of sessile serrated lesion in the colorectum and its relationship to synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:1495-1504. [PMID: 33470706 PMCID: PMC8555953 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of sessile serrated lesion (SSL) and its relationship to synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Comprehensive, computerized research was performed on PubMed and published from 1 January 2010 to 6 July 2018 which searched relevant articles without any language limitations. Clinical trials were included in the narrative systemic review if they matched the following inclusion criteria: (1) published as a case-controlled study, cohort study or cross-sectional study; (2) defined objectively for diagnosis of SSL within the studies; (3) addressed the prevalence and characteristics of SSL. Within these trials, if they met additional criteria involving the reported outcome of risk regarding advanced neoplasia in relation to SSL, they were enrolled into meta-analysis. RESULTS Forty-one trials were enrolled for the systematic review, with a total of eight analyzed for the meta-analysis. The prevalence of all SSL ranged from 0.038 to 20.23% and the prevalence by pooled analysis was 2.7%. In a subgroup analysis, the overall prevalence of SSL during the periods of 2010-2014 and 2015-2018 was shown to be 2.7 and 2.8%, respectively. We calculated the pooled data on the cancer risk of SSL and the risk of synchronous advanced neoplasia in patients with SSL made available from the eight trials, which resulted in a pooled odds ratio of 3.53 (95% confidence interval 2.39-5.20, I2 = 4%, P = 0.40). CONCLUSION In this systemic review, SSL was found to be associated with an increased risk of synchronous advanced neoplasia in the colorectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sz-Iuan Shiu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital
- Evidence-based Practice and Policymaking Committee, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hiroshi Kashida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Yoriaki Komeda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Low potency of fecal immunological surveillance testing soon after negative colonoscopy or resection of low-risk adenoma in average-risk patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:e933-e938. [PMID: 34750324 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postcolonoscopy surveillance colonoscopy based on positive fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is often performed, although its long-term efficacy has not been established. The aim of this study was to clarify the low potency of FOBT surveillance at short intervals after colonoscopy. METHODS Colonoscopy was performed in 1308 average-risk patients, based on positive results of immunological FOBT [fecal immunological test (FIT)]. Patients were stratified according to the length of time since their last colonoscopy and their colonoscopy results [no adenoma or 1-2 small (<10 mm) adenomas]. Tumor detection rates were determined. RESULTS The baseline patients characteristics did not differ between the groups. The advanced lesion detection rate (ALDR) among the patients who had never undergone a colonoscopy was 21.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.1-25.0%]. Among the patients who had no adenoma detected in the previous colonoscopy within the past 5 years, the past 5-10 years and over 10 years, the ALDRs were 2.5% (95% CI, 1.0-5.5%), 4.1% (95% CI, 1.5-9.4%) and 9.3% (95% CI, 3.1-22.2%), respectively. Among the patients who had 1-2 small adenomas, the ALDRs were 7.4% (95% CI, 3.4-14.8%), 12.1% (95% CI, 4.2-27.9%) and 27.8% (95% CI, 12.2-51.2%), respectively. Invasive cancer was not observed in any patients within 5 years since the prior colonoscopy. CONCLUSION In average-risk patients whose prior colonoscopy detected no adenomas or low-risk adenomas, postcolonoscopy surveillance by FIT has a low positive predictive value within a 5-year interval.
Collapse
|
47
|
Park E, Barge W, Kramer J, Alajati B, Jakate S, Cimbaluk D, Giusto D, Ritz E, Bishehsari F, Lee S, Singh S, Losurdo J, Brown M, DeMeo M, Abraham R, Ma K, Melson J. Interobserver reliability of methods to determine complete resection of adenomas in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1250-1255. [PMID: 33285582 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-4446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Forceps margin biopsy and polypectomy specimen margins have both been used to assess for polypectomy resection adequacy. The interobserver reliability of the two methods has not been well described. METHODS The interpretability of polypectomy specimens for presence of residual neoplasia at the margin was assessed by two blinded pathologists. Next, the concordance of forceps margin biopsy interpretations between three blinded pathologists was evaluated by calculation of interobserver κ. RESULTS Rates of polypectomy specimen margin interpretability were low: 24/92 (26 %) for pathologist A, 28/92 (30.4 %) for pathologist B. Concordance of forceps margin biopsy interpretations (n = 129) between pathologists was high. Two internal pathologists showed substantial agreement in margin biopsy interpretations (κ 0.779; 95 %CL 0.543, 0.912). The concordance remained strong after biopsies were reviewed by a third, external pathologist (κ 0.829; 95 %CL 0.658, 0.924). There was complete agreement on 123/129 (95.3 %) between all three pathologists for presence of neoplasia. CONCLUSION The majority of polypectomy specimen margins were uninterpretable by pathologists for presence of residual neoplasia. Forceps margin biopsy shows strong interobserver reliability in adenomatous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - William Barge
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jason Kramer
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bana Alajati
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shriram Jakate
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Cimbaluk
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deborah Giusto
- 4Path Pathology Services Laboratory, Burr Ridge, Illinois, USA
| | - Ethan Ritz
- Clinical Informatics and Biostatistics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Faraz Bishehsari
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Saline Lee
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shubha Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John Losurdo
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Brown
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark DeMeo
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rana Abraham
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karen Ma
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kröner PT, Engels MML, Glicksberg BS, Johnson KW, Mzaik O, van Hooft JE, Wallace MB, El-Serag HB, Krittanawong C. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:6794-6824. [PMID: 34790008 PMCID: PMC8567482 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i40.6794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased dramatically in the last 20 years, with clinical applications progressively being explored for most of the medical specialties. The field of gastroenterology and hepatology, substantially reliant on vast amounts of imaging studies, is not an exception. The clinical applications of AI systems in this field include the identification of premalignant or malignant lesions (e.g., identification of dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus, pancreatic malignancies), detection of lesions (e.g., polyp identification and classification, small-bowel bleeding lesion on capsule endoscopy, pancreatic cystic lesions), development of objective scoring systems for risk stratification, predicting disease prognosis or treatment response [e.g., determining survival in patients post-resection of hepatocellular carcinoma), determining which patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will benefit from biologic therapy], or evaluation of metrics such as bowel preparation score or quality of endoscopic examination. The objective of this comprehensive review is to analyze the available AI-related studies pertaining to the entirety of the gastrointestinal tract, including the upper, middle and lower tracts; IBD; the hepatobiliary system; and the pancreas, discussing the findings and clinical applications, as well as outlining the current limitations and future directions in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T Kröner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States
| | - Megan ML Engels
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam 1105, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin S Glicksberg
- The Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Kipp W Johnson
- The Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Obaie Mzaik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Amsterdam 2300, The Netherlands
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi 11001, United Arab Emirates
| | - Hashem B El-Serag
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
- Section of Health Services Research, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Chayakrit Krittanawong
- Section of Health Services Research, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
- Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cao LJ, Peng XL, Xue WQ, Zhang R, Zhang JB, Zhou T, Wu ZY, Li GR, Wang TM, He YQ, Yang DW, Liao Y, Tong XT, Wang F, Chen KX, Zhang SH, Zhu LQ, Ding PR, Jia WH. A fecal-based test for the detection of advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer: a case-control and screening cohort study. BMC Med 2021; 19:250. [PMID: 34689777 PMCID: PMC8543798 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02123-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Screening is a confirmed way to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of CRC. This study aimed to identify a fecal-based, noninvasive, and accurate method for detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma (AA). METHODS Through detection in tissue (n = 96) and fecal samples (n = 88) and tested in an independent group of fecal samples (n = 294), the methylated DNA marker ITGA4 and bacterial markers Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) and Pepetostreptococcusanaerobius (Pa) were identified from the candidate biomarkers for CRC and AA detection. A prediction score (pd-score) was constructed using the selected markers and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for distinguishing AA and CRC from healthy subjects by logistic regression method. The diagnostic performance of the pd-score was compared with FIT and validated in the external validation cohort (n = 117) and in a large CRC screening cohort. RESULTS The pd-score accurately identified AA and CRC from healthy subjects with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958, at a specificity of 91.37%; the pd-score showed sensitivities of 95.38% for CRC and 70.83% for AA, respectively. In the external validation cohort, the sensitivities of the pd-score for CRC and AA detection were 94.03% and 80.00%, respectively. When applied in screening, the pd-score identified 100% (11/11) of CRC and 70.83% (17/24) of AA in participants with both colonoscopy results and qualified fecal samples, showing an improvement by 41.19% compared to FIT. CONCLUSIONS The current study developed a noninvasive and well-validated approach for AA and CRC detection, which could be applied widely as a diagnostic and screening test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian-Jing Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Lin Peng
- Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Qiong Xue
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong Zhang
- Department of Endoscopy and Laser, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiang-Bo Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ting Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biobank of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zi-Yi Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Gai-Rui Li
- Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Tong-Min Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong-Qiao He
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Da-Wei Yang
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xia-Ting Tong
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke-Xin Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi-Hong Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-Qing Zhu
- Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Pei-Rong Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Hua Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangzhou, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
- Biobank of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sasaki A, Ichita C, Sumida C, Kimura K, Nishino T, Tasaki J, Masuda S, Kawachi J, Kudo M, Teshima S, Koizumi K, Kako M. Advanced Colon Cancer after Curative Resection of Intramucosal Adenocarcinoma with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2021; 15:603-609. [PMID: 34616263 PMCID: PMC8454252 DOI: 10.1159/000516314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), for colorectal cancers enables a precise pathological diagnosis and safe R0 resection. The recurrence rate after ESD is generally extremely low, with annual surveillance colonoscopy recommended. However, surveillance may not be considered for super-elderly patients owing to their condition. This is a case report of an 85-year-old man in whom curative resection was achieved for an intramucosal adenocarcinoma with ESD. The patient presented with a hypoechoic mass located in his lower right abdomen, diagnosed via surveillance abdominal ultrasound. He had undergone curative ESD for intramucosal cecal cancer 2 years prior. Colonoscopy revealed a type 2 epithelial tumor at the proximal aspect of the ESD scar. Ileocolic resection with lymph node dissection was performed. An epithelial tumor and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma but not a submucosal tumor was detected in the mucosal layer. The lesion was diagnosed not as a local recurrence after ESD but as a newly emerged original advanced cancer. After ESD for colorectal cancer, a newly developed advanced cancer may occur at the site of the ESD scar in a shorter term than usual. Surveillance colonoscopy after ESD is necessary even for super-elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Sasaki
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Chikamasa Ichita
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Chihiro Sumida
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Karen Kimura
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishino
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Junichi Tasaki
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Sakue Masuda
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Jun Kawachi
- Department of General Surgery, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Madoka Kudo
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Shinichi Teshima
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Kazuya Koizumi
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Makoto Kako
- Gastroenterology Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| |
Collapse
|