1
|
Huang W, Lin R, Du Z, Wu Z, Ke X, Tang L. Performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for differentiation of patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. Ann Med 2025; 57:2442072. [PMID: 39699082 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2442072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic liver tumors (MLT) are the most common malignant liver lesions, each requiring distinct therapeutic approaches. Accurate differentiation between these malignancies is critical for appropriate treatment planning and prognostication. However, there is limited data on the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS-LI-RADS) in this differentiation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the CEUS-LI-RADS in distinguishing between HCC and MLT in an expanded population at risk for both tumors. METHODS Between June 2017 and January 2022, 108 patients with HCC and 138 patients with MLT who were pathologically diagnosed, where included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CEUS features and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) categories of the lesions, and based on their consensus, we calculated the diagnostic performance, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CEUS-LI-RADS criteria. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS category 5 (CEUS-LR-5) for predicting HCC were 49.1% [95% confidence interval (CI)) 39.3-58.9], 97.1% (95% CI 92.7-99.2), and 76%, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for LI-RADS category M (LR-M) for diagnosing MLT were 89.1% (95%CI 82.7-93.8), 72.2% (95%CI 62.8-80.4), and 81.7%, respectively. Based on current LR-M criteria, a small proportion of HCCs were classified as LR-M due to the presence of early cessation (45-60s). In the analysis of the MLT subgroup, we found that the tumor size affects the distribution of LI-RADS (LR) classification in the subgroup (p = 0.037), and LI-RADS category 3 (LR-3) classification was observed more frequently in tumors of small size (≤3cm) than those of larger size. In addition, LR-3 metastases were more frequently characterized by hypovascular supply. CONCLUSIONS CEUS-LI-RADS demonstrates high specificity in distinguishing HCC from MLT, providing a reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool that can enhance clinical decision-making. These findings are clinically significant as they can improve patient management and treatment outcomes, and they underscore the need for future research to refine and expand the use of CEUS-LI-RADS in diverse clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiqin Huang
- Department of Ultrasonography, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ruoxuan Lin
- Department of Ultrasonography, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhongshi Du
- Department of Ultrasonography, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhougui Wu
- Department of Ultrasonography, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaohui Ke
- Department of Ultrasonography, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Lina Tang
- Department of Ultrasonography, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park C, Hwang G, Choi WM, Han JE, Kim C, Lee DY, Heo S, Park RW. Baseline Alpha-Fetoprotein Elevation and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multicentre Cohort Study. J Viral Hepat 2025; 32:e70006. [PMID: 39878696 DOI: 10.1111/jvh.70006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and its changes in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may influence the risk of future hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to evaluate the HCC risk in CHB patients with no overt HCC but with elevated AFP level and to explore the prognostic role of longitudinal changes in AFP and liver-related laboratory values. This multicentre cohort study included 10,639 CHB patients without a history of HCC from seven medical facilities in South Korea. Patients with a baseline serum AFP test and no HCC diagnosis on imaging within 3 months were included. Patients were categorised into high-AFP (≥ 10 ng/mL) and normal-AFP (< 10 ng/mL) groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of HCC within 2 years, with secondary outcomes focused on longitudinal changes in AFP and liver-related laboratory values. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess HCC risk. After 1:4 PSM, 1278 high-AFP and 3731 normal-AFP patients were analysed. The high-AFP group had a significantly higher 2-year incidence of HCC (HR: 4.29; 95% CI: 3.31-5.57). AFP levels increased in patients who developed HCC in both groups (p < 0.01). Among the high-AFP group, patients who did not develop HCC had elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase levels (p < 0.01), which decreased during follow-up (p < 0.01) unlike those who developed HCC. In conclusion, baseline AFP elevation in CHB patients is associated with an increased risk of developing HCC within 2 years. Longitudinal monitoring of AFP and liver-related laboratory values can help in risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ChulHyoung Park
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyubeom Hwang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Mook Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Eun Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Chungsoo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Dong Yun Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Subin Heo
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Rae Woong Park
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vutien P, Kim NJ, Nguyen MH. The Diagnosis and Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Current Practices. Clin Liver Dis 2025; 29:33-48. [PMID: 39608956 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2024.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
Promoting the early detection and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a critical strategy to improve patient outcomes as this can lead to greater access to curative treatments. This review highlights the diagnostic tests for HCC, including the use of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System systems and histopathology. Staging is essential for informing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions; this review also covers a widely used and well-validated staging system called the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm. The BCLC incorporates tumor status, liver function, and patient performance to stage patients with newly diagnosed HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Vutien
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1536 North 115th Street, Suite 105, Box 358811, Seattle, WA 98133, USA.
| | - Nicole J Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1536 North 115th Street, Suite 105, Box 358811, Seattle, WA 98133, USA
| | - Mindie H Nguyen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington Medical Center, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359773, Seattle, WA 98104, USA; Stanford University Medical Center, 780 Welch Road, Suite CJ250K, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sangro B, Argemi J, Ronot M, Paradis V, Meyer T, Mazzaferro V, Jepsen P, Golfieri R, Galle P, Dawson L, Reig M. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2025; 82:315-374. [PMID: 39690085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu PLH, Chiu KWH, Lu J, Lui GC, Zhou J, Cheng HM, Mao X, Wu J, Shen XP, Kwok KM, Kan WK, Ho Y, Chan HT, Xiao P, Mak LY, Tsui VW, Hui C, Lam PM, Deng Z, Guo J, Ni L, Huang J, Yu S, Peng C, Li WK, Yuen MF, Seto WK. Application of a deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of HCC. JHEP Rep 2025; 7:101219. [PMID: 39687602 PMCID: PMC11648772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by a high mortality rate. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) results in a considerable number of indeterminate observations, rendering an accurate diagnosis difficult. Methods We developed four deep learning models for diagnosing HCC on computed tomography (CT) via a training-validation-testing approach. Thin-slice triphasic CT liver images and relevant clinical information were collected and processed for deep learning. HCC was diagnosed and verified via a 12-month clinical composite reference standard. CT observations among at-risk patients were annotated using LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was assessed by internal validation and independent external testing. We conducted sensitivity analyses of different subgroups, deep learning explainability evaluation, and misclassification analysis. Results From 2,832 patients and 4,305 CT observations, the best-performing model was Spatio-Temporal 3D Convolution Network (ST3DCN), achieving area under receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.919 (95% CI, 0.903-0.935) and 0.901 (95% CI, 0.879-0.924) at the observation (n = 1,077) and patient (n = 685) levels, respectively during internal validation, compared with 0.839 (95% CI, 0.814-0.864) and 0.822 (95% CI, 0.790-0.853), respectively for standard of care radiological interpretation. The negative predictive values of ST3DCN were 0.966 (95% CI, 0.954-0.979) and 0.951 (95% CI, 0.931-0.971), respectively. The observation-level AUCs among at-risk patients, 2-5-cm observations, and singular portovenous phase analysis of ST3DCN were 0.899 (95% CI, 0.874-0.924), 0.872 (95% CI, 0.838-0.909) and 0.912 (95% CI, 0.895-0.929), respectively. In external testing (551/717 patients/observations), the AUC of ST3DCN was 0.901 (95% CI, 0.877-0.924), which was non-inferior to radiological interpretation (AUC 0.900; 95% CI, 0.877--923). Conclusions ST3DCN achieved strong, robust performance for accurate HCC diagnosis on CT. Thus, deep learning can expedite and improve the process of diagnosing HCC. Impact and implications The clinical applicability of deep learning in HCC diagnosis is potentially huge, especially considering the expected increase in the incidence and mortality of HCC worldwide. Early diagnosis through deep learning can lead to earlier definitive management, particularly for at-risk patients. The model can be broadly deployed for patients undergoing a triphasic contrast CT scan of the liver to reduce the currently high mortality rate of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Leung Ho Yu
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Keith Wan-Hang Chiu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jianliang Lu
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Gilbert C.S. Lui
- Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ho-Ming Cheng
- Department of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xianhua Mao
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Juan Wu
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xin-Ping Shen
- Department of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - King Ming Kwok
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai Kuen Kan
- Department of Radiology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Y.C. Ho
- Department of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hung Tat Chan
- Department of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Peng Xiao
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lung-Yi Mak
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Vivien W.M. Tsui
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Cynthia Hui
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pui Mei Lam
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Zijie Deng
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiaqi Guo
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Li Ni
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinhua Huang
- Department of Minimal Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sarah Yu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chengzhi Peng
- Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai Keung Li
- Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Man-Fung Yuen
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai-Kay Seto
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh T, Mehta N, Gupta P, Gulati A, Gulati M, Kalra N, Premkumar M, Taneja S, Jearth V, Sharma V, Duseja A. Multiphasic Computed Tomography Enhancement Characteristics and Utility of Delayed Phase in Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2025; 35:67-72. [PMID: 39697508 PMCID: PMC11651847 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The aims of this study are to compare the multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) characteristics of infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with nodular HCC and to assess the conspicuity of infiltrative HCC on different phases of CECT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study comprised consecutive treatment-naive cirrhotic patients diagnosed with infiltrative and nodular HCC between January 2020 and December 2021 based on a multiphasic CECT (comprising arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases). The diagnosis of HCC was based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 criteria (LR-4 and LR-5 lesions). Infiltrative HCCs are characterized by large, irregular, permeative lesions spread over multiple liver segments or lobes. Nodular HCCs comprise well-defined tumor nodules. Two radiologists independently reviewed all CT images. Additionally, lesion conspicuity on the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases was assessed. Results One hundred fifty-eight patients (117 nodular and 41 infiltrative HCCs; mean age: 55.6 ± 17.2 years; 90 [56.9%] males) were included. Arterial phase hyperenhancement, portal venous/delayed phase washout, and delayed phase enhancing capsule were significantly associated with nodular HCCs ( p = 0.002, 0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively). Portal vein, hepatic vein thrombosis, biliary dilatation, and ascites were significantly associated with infiltrative HCCs ( p < 0.0001, 0.004, <0.0001, and 0.003, respectively). The interobserver agreement for the conspicuity of infiltrative HCC was the highest for the delayed phase (weighted kappa = 0.611). Conclusion Infiltrative HCCs show the major LI-RADS features less frequently compared with nodular HCCs, and venous thrombosis is an important clue to the diagnosis. The delayed phase of multiphasic CECT is critical to identifying these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarvinder Singh
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nandita Mehta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pankaj Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ajay Gulati
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Mudita Gulati
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Naveen Kalra
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Madhumita Premkumar
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sunil Taneja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vaneet Jearth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vishal Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adamo RG, Lam E, Salameh JP, van der Pol CB, Goins SM, Dawit H, Costa AF, Levis B, Singal AG, Chernyak V, Sirlin CB, Bashir MR, Tang A, Alhasan A, Allen BC, Reiner CS, Clarke C, Ludwig DR, Cerny M, Wang J, Hyun Choi S, Fraum TJ, Song B, Joo I, Yeon Kim S, Kwon H, Jiang H, Kang HJ, Kierans AS, Kim YY, Ronot M, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, Soo Song J, McInnes MDF. Do Risk Factors for HCC Impact the Association of CT/MRI LIRADS Major Features With HCC? An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024:8465371241306297. [PMID: 39733353 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241306297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Guidelines suggest the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) may not be applicable for some populations at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, data assessing the association of HCC risk factors with LI-RADS major features are lacking. Purpose: To evaluate whether the association between HCC risk factors and each CT/MRI LI-RADS major feature differs among individuals at-risk for HCC. Methods: Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched from 2014 to 2022. Individual participant data (IPD) were extracted from studies evaluating HCC diagnosis using CT/MRI LI-RADS and reporting HCC risk factors. IPD from studies were pooled and modelled with one-stage meta-regressions. Interactions were assessed between major features and HCC risk factors, including age, sex, cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), and study location. A mixed effects model that included the major features, as well as separate models that included interactions between each risk factor and each major feature, were fit. Differences in interactions across levels of each risk factor were calculated using adjusted odds-ratios (ORs), 95% confidence-intervals (CI), and z-tests. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. (Protocol: https://osf.io/tdv7j/). Results: Across 23 studies (2958 patients and 3553 observations), the associations between LI-RADS major features and HCC were consistent across several HCC risk factors (P-value range: .09-.99). A sensitivity analysis among the 4 studies with a low risk of bias did not differ from the primary analysis. Conclusion: The association between CT/MRI LI-RADS major features and HCC risk factors do not significantly differ in individuals at-risk for HCC. These findings suggest that CT/MR LI-RADS should be applied to all patients considered at risk by LI-RADS without modification or exclusions, regardless of the presence or absence of the risk factors evaluated in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert G Adamo
- Faculty of Medicine at The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Lam
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Christian B van der Pol
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Haben Dawit
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Brooke Levis
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Ayman Alhasan
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Medina, Saudi Arabia
| | - Brian C Allen
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Caecilia S Reiner
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Clarke
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Daniel R Ludwig
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Milena Cerny
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heejin Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Seogu, Busan, South Korea
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hyo-Jin Kang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Yeun-Yoon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy & Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France
| | - Joanna Podgórska
- 2nd Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Rosiak
- 2nd Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ji Soo Song
- Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, South Korea
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- Rm c-159 Departments of Radiology and Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liang H, Yang M, Luo D, Wu YK. Improving Adherence of Young Male Patients with HBV Infection to the Regular Follow-Up via Mobile Healthcare Platform Might Be Cost-Effective to Decrease the Morbidity of Advanced Liver Cancer. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:2581-2595. [PMID: 39717819 PMCID: PMC11665142 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s497831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Young adults contribute substantially to the social economy. However, the number of young adults with liver cancer has increased recently. In addition, the mortality rate of these patients is high. Methods This retrospective study investigated the risk factors of young patients diagnosed with liver cancer over the past 12 years. Results The risk factors of liver cancer, including male, HBV infection, and family history of diseases, were more common in young patients. Nearly 80% of young patients (198/253) were tested as positive HBsAg. However, most of these patients did not visit doctors regularly, as recommended. Thus, 55.7% of young patients were diagnosed with advanced liver cancer. The aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were independently associated with advanced liver cancer (OR = 4.262, 95% CI = 1.559-11.65, P = 0.005) in the multivariable logistic regression. The 1-year survival rate of these patients was 19.4%. Conclusion The high-risk factors of liver cancer are common in young patients. The poor adherence to regularly visited doctors in young patients might contribute to the high ratio of advanced liver cancer. The 1-year survival rate of these patients is low. Improving patient's adherence via mobile healthcare platform and monitoring serum AST levels might decrease the incidence and mortality of liver cancer in young adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dan Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ya-Kun Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kierans AS, Fowler KJ, Chernyak V. LI-RADS in 2024: recent updates, planned refinements, and future directions. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04730-w. [PMID: 39671010 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04730-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2024] [Revised: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Initially released in 2011, liver imaging reporting and data (LI-RADS) CT/MRI diagnostic algorithm categorizes hepatic observations on an ordinal scale based on the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma, malignancy, or benignity, and guides reproducible interpretation, clear communication, and standardized terminology for liver imaging. LI-RADS has significantly expanded in scope in the past decade, with the inclusion of algorithms that address screening and surveillance, diagnosis with contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and treatment response assessment with both CEUS and CT/MRI. LI-RADS algorithms undergo periodic refinements based on accumulating scientific evidence, user feedback, and technological advancements. This manuscript discusses recent LI-RADS algorithm refinements, planned updates, with a focus on LI-RADS CT/MRI diagnostic algorithm, and future goals.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jang HJ, Choi SH, Wee S, Choi SJ, Byun JH, Won HJ, Shin YM, Sirlin CB. CT- and MRI-based Factors Associated with Rapid Growth in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology 2024; 313:e240961. [PMID: 39718496 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Prediction of the tumor growth rates is clinically important in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but previous studies have presented conflicting results and generally lacked radiologic evaluations. Purpose To evaluate the percentage of rapidly growing early-stage HCCs in each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category and to identify prognostic factors associated with rapid growth. Materials and Methods Retrospective study of patients with risk factors for HCC and those with surgically proven early-stage HCC who underwent two or more preoperative multiphasic CT or MRI examinations between January 2016 and December 2020. LI-RADS categories were assigned according to the baseline CT or MRI results. The tumor volume doubling time (TVDT) was calculated from the tumor volumes measured at the two examinations. The growth rate was classified as rapid (TVDT < 3 months), intermediate (TVDT = 3-9 months), or indolent (TVDT > 9 months). The percentage of rapidly growing HCCs was compared among the LI-RADS categories, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with rapidly growing HCC. Results In 322 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 9 [SD]; 249 men) with 345 HCCs (30 LR-3, 64 LR-4, 221 LR-5, and 30 LR-M category), the median TVDT of HCC was 131 days (IQR, 87-233) and 27.0% of HCCs showed rapid growth. The growth rates differed among the LI-RADS categories, with a higher percentage of rapidly growing HCCs observed for LR-M HCCs than for LR-3 (70.0% vs 3.3%, P < .001), LR-4 (70.0% vs 12.5%, P < .001), or LR-5 (70.0% vs 28.5%, P < .001) HCCs. An α-fetoprotein level greater than 400 ng/mL (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.54; 95% CI: 1.16, 5.54; P = .02), baseline tumor diameter (adjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.87; P = .004), and LR-M category (adjusted OR, 9.26; 95% CI: 3.70, 23.16; P < .001) were independently associated with higher odds of rapid growth. Conclusion Among early-stage HCCs, LR-M category was an independent factor for rapid growth, observed in 70% of HCCs. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon Ji Jang
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Sungwoo Wee
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Se Jin Choi
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Hyung Jin Won
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Yong Moon Shin
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea (H.J.J., S.H.C., S.J.C., J.H.B., H.J.W., Y.M.S.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California- San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seif El Dahan K, Yokoo T, Mendiratta-Lala M, Fetzer D, Davenport M, Daher D, Rich NE, Yang E, Parikh ND, Singal AG. Exam quality of ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI and impact on early-stage HCC detection. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04674-1. [PMID: 39542949 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04674-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Revised: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE MRI is a potential alternative to ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection. We evaluated the impact of ultrasound and dynamic abbreviated MRI (AMRI) exam quality on early-stage HCC detection. METHODS We conducted a multicenter case-control study among patients with cirrhosis (cases with early-stage HCC per Milan Criteria; controls without HCC) who underwent both a liver ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) AMRI within 6 months in 2012-2019. Two radiologists performed independent, blinded interpretations of both exams for HCC detection and scored exam quality as no/mild, moderate, or severe limitations. Associations between exam quality, patient characteristics, and HCC detection were assessed by odds ratios (OR). RESULTS Of 216 cases and 432 controls, severe limitations were reported in 7% and 8% of ultrasounds and DCE-AMRIs, respectively. Severe limitations at ultrasound were associated with obesity (OR 2.08, 95%CI [1.32-3.32]) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (OR 1.98 [1.12-3.44]) but not for DCE-AMRI. Decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C) was associated with severe limitations for both ultrasound (OR 2.54 [1.37-4.58]) and DCE-AMRI (OR 3.96 [2.36-6.58]). Compared to exams with no/mild limitations, exams with severe limitations had lower sensitivity for ultrasound (79.6% vs. 21.7%, P < 0.001) and AMRI (86.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.001). In patients in whom ultrasound was severely limited, DCE-AMRI had significantly higher odds of early-stage HCC detection than ultrasound (OR 8.23 [1.25-54.02]). CONCLUSIONS HCC detection by DCE-AMRI may be preferred in patients with severe limitations at ultrasound due to obesity and MASLD. Both modalities remain limited for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, for whom alternative strategies may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | - David Fetzer
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | - Darine Daher
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Nicole E Rich
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Edward Yang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | - Amit G Singal
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Singal AG, Narasimman M, Daher D, Yekkaluri S, Liu Y, Lee M, Cerda V, Khan A, Seif El Dahan K, Kramer J, Gopal P, Murphy C, Hernaez R. Effectiveness of mailed outreach and patient navigation to promote HCC screening process completion: a multicentre pragmatic randomised clinical trial. Gut 2024; 73:2037-2044. [PMID: 38839269 PMCID: PMC11560624 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is plagued by failures across the cancer care continuum, leading to frequent late-stage diagnoses and high mortality. We evaluated the effectiveness of mailed outreach invitations plus patient navigation to promote HCC screening process completion in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS Between April 2018 and September 2021, we conducted a multicentre pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing mailed outreach plus patient navigation for HCC screening (n=1436) versus usual care with visit-based screening (n=1436) among patients with cirrhosis at three US health systems. Our primary outcome was screening process completion over a 36-month period, and our secondary outcome was the proportion of time covered (PTC) by screening. All patients were included in intention-to-screen analyses. RESULTS All 2872 participants (median age 61.3 years; 32.3% women) were included in intention-to-screen analyses. Screening process completion was observed in 6.6% (95% CI: 5.3% to 7.9%) of patients randomised to outreach and 3.3% (95% CI: 2.4% to 4.3%) of those randomised to usual care (OR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.92). The intervention increased HCC screening process completion across most subgroups including age, sex, race and ethnicity, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class and health system. PTC was also significantly higher in the outreach arm than usual care (mean 37.5% vs 28.2%; RR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.31 to 1.35). Despite screening underuse, most HCC in both arms were detected at an early stage. CONCLUSION Mailed outreach plus navigation significantly increased HCC screening process completion versus usual care in patients with cirrhosis, with a consistent effect across most examined subgroups. However, screening completion remained suboptimal in both arms, underscoring a need for more intensive interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02582918.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Manasa Narasimman
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Darine Daher
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Sruthi Yekkaluri
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - MinJae Lee
- Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Vanessa Cerda
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Aisha Khan
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Karim Seif El Dahan
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Kramer
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Purva Gopal
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Caitlin Murphy
- School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ruben Hernaez
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee S, Kim YY, Shin J, Shin H, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V. Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:7025-7040. [PMID: 38809263 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10813-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category 5 has high specificity and modest sensitivity for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 vs combined LR-4 and LR-5 (LR-4/5) for HCC diagnosis. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through January 03, 2023 were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 and combined LR-4/5 for HCC diagnosis, using CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material. RESULTS Sixty-nine studies (15,108 observations, 9928 (65.7%) HCCs) were included. Compared to LR-5, combined LR-4/5 showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (83.0% (95% CI [80.3-85.8%]) vs 65.7% (95% CI [62.4-69.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled specificity (75.0% (95% CI [70.5-79.6%]) vs 91.7% (95% CI [90.2-93.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled positive likelihood ratio (3.60 (95% CI [3.06-4.23]) vs 6.18 (95% CI [5.35-7.14]); p < 0.001), and lower pooled negative likelihood ratio (0.22 (95% CI [0.19-0.25]) vs 0.38 (95% CI [0.35-0.41]) vs; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis showed that combining LR-4 and LR-5 would increase sensitivity but decrease specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. These findings may inform management guidelines and individualized management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This meta-analysis estimated the magnitude of changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria when LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were combined; these findings can inform management guidelines and individualized management. KEY POINTS There is no single worldwide reporting system for liver imaging, partly due to regional needs. Combining LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 increased sensitivity and decreased specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria can inform management guidelines and individualized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeun-Yoon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyejung Shin
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Singal AG, Parikh ND, Shetty K, Han SH, Xie C, Ning J, Rinaudo JA, Arvind A, Lok AS, Kanwal F. Natural History of Indeterminate Liver Nodules in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:2251-2258. [PMID: 38686922 PMCID: PMC11534566 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indeterminate liver nodules (ILNs) are frequently encountered on diagnostic imaging after positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance results, but their natural history remains unclear. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study among patients with ≥1 newly detected LI-RADS 3 (LR-3) lesion ≥1 cm or LI-RADS 4 (LR-4) lesion of any size (per LI-RADS v2018) between January 2018 and December 2019. Patients were followed with repeat imaging at each site per institutional standard of care. Multivariable Fine-Gray models were used to evaluate associations between potential risk factors and patient-level time-to-HCC diagnosis, with death and liver transplantation as competing risks. RESULTS Of 307 patients with ILNs, 208 had LR-3 lesions, 83 had LR-4 lesions, and 16 had both LR-3 and LR-4 lesions. HCC incidence rates for patients with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions were 110 (95% CI 70-150) and 420 (95% CI 310-560) per 1,000 person-year, respectively. In multivariable analysis, incident HCC among patients with LR-3 lesions was associated with older age, thrombocytopenia (platelet count ≤150 ×10 9 /L), and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. Among those with LR-4 lesions, incident HCC was associated with a maximum lesion diameter >1 cm. Although most patients had follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, 13.7% had no follow-up imaging and another 14.3% had follow-up ultrasound only. DISCUSSION ILNs have a high but variable risk of HCC, with 4-fold higher risk in patients with LR-4 lesions than those with LR-3 lesions, highlighting a need for accurate risk stratification tools and close follow-up in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kirti Shetty
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Steven-Huy Han
- Pfleger Liver Institute, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cassie Xie
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ashwini Arvind
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anna S Lok
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- VA HSR'D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Agnello F, Cannella R, Brancatelli G, Galia M. LI-RADS v2018 category and imaging features: inter-modality agreement between contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:1575-1586. [PMID: 39158817 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01879-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform an intra-individual comparison of LI-RADS category and imaging features in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), and extracellular agent-enhanced MRI (ECA-MRI) and to analyze the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality. METHOD This retrospective study included cirrhotic patients with at least one LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR-TIV observation imaged with at least two imaging modalities among CT, EOB-MRI, or ECA-MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the observations using the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm. Reference standard included pathologic confirmation and imaging criteria according to LI-RADS v2018. Imaging features were compared between different exams using the McNemar test. Inter-modality agreement was calculated by using the weighted Cohen's kappa (k) test. RESULTS A total of 144 observations (mean size 34.0 ± 32.4 mm) in 96 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the detection of major and ancillary imaging features between the three imaging modalities. When considering all the observations, inter-modality agreement for category assignment was substantial between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.60; 95%CI 0.44, 0.75), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.46; 95%CI 0.22, 0.69) and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.72; 95%CI 0.59, 0.85). In observations smaller than 20 mm, inter-modality agreement was fair between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.26; 95%CI 0.05, 0.47), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.42; 95%CI -0.02, 0.88), and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.65; 95%CI 0.47, 0.82). ECA-MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (70%) and specificity (100%) when considering LR-5 as predictor of HCC. CONCLUSIONS Inter-modality agreement between CT, ECA-MRI, and EOB-MRI decreases in observations smaller than 20 mm. ECA-MRI has the provided higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Agnello
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127. 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127. 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brancatelli
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127. 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Galia
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127. 90127, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Naringrekar H, Costa AF, Lam E, van der Pol CB, Bashir MR, Salameh JP, McInnes MDF. Risk of Bias in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Studies Using QUADAS-2. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024:8465371241280874. [PMID: 39412288 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241280874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Use a tailored version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool to evaluate risk of bias and applicability across LIRADS related publications. Method: A tailored QUADAS-2 tool was created through consensus approach to assess risk of bias and applicability across 37 LI-RADS related publications. Studies were selected from 2017 to 2022 using the assistance of experienced hospital librarians to search for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced ultrasound for HCC using LI-RADS through multiple different databases. QUADAS-2 assessments were performed in duplicate and independently by 2 authors with experience using the QUADAS-2 tool. Disagreements were resolved with a third expert reviewer. Consensus QUADAS-2 assessments were tabulated for each domain. Results: Using the tailored QUADAS-2 tool, 31 of the 37 included LI-RADS studies were assessed as high risk of bias, and 9 out of 37 studies demonstrated concerns for applicability. Patient selection (21 out of 37 studies) and flow/timing (24 out of 37 studies) domains demonstrated the highest risk of bias. 6 out of 37 studies in the index domain demonstrated high risk of bias. 2 out of 37 studies showed high risk of bias in the reference standard domain. Conclusion: A significant proportion of LI-RADS research is at risk of bias with concerns for applicability. Identifying risk of bias in such research is essential to recognize limitations of a study that may affect the validity of the results. Areas for improvement in LI-RADS research include reducing selection bias, avoiding inappropriate exclusions, and decreasing verification bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haresh Naringrekar
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Eric Lam
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ma L, Pan J, Shu G, Pan H, Li J, Li D, Sun S. Non-invasive fast assessment of hepatic injury through computed tomography imaging with renal-clearable Bi-DTPA dimeglumine. Regen Biomater 2024; 11:rbae118. [PMID: 39398283 PMCID: PMC11467190 DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 08/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging with iodinated imaging probes is widely utilized for the diagnosis and evaluation of various liver diseases. However, these iodine-based imaging probes face intractable limitations including allergic reactions and contraindications. Herein, we propose the utilization of renal-clearable iodine-free bismuth chelate (Bi-DTPA dimeglumine) for the non-invasive fast assessment of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) via CT imaging for the first time. Bi-DTPA dimeglumine offers several advantages such as simple synthesis, no purification requirement, a yield approaching 100%, large-scale production capability (laboratory synthesis > 100 g), excellent biocompatibility and superior CT imaging performance. In a normal rat model, the administration of Bi-DTPA dimeglumine resulted in a significant 63.79% increase in liver CT value within a very short time period (30 s). Furthermore, in a HIRI rat model, Bi-DTPA dimeglumine enabled the rapid differentiation between healthy and injured areas based on the notable disparity in liver CT values as early as 15 min post-reperfusion, which showed a strong correlation with the histopathological analysis results. Additionally, Bi-DTPA dimeglumine can be almost eliminated from the body via the kidneys within 24 h. As an inherently advantageous alternative to iodinated imaging probes, Bi-DTPA dimeglumine exhibits promising prospects for application in liver disease diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ma
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Jinbin Pan
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Gang Shu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Haiyan Pan
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Jingang Li
- Department of medical technology, Taishan Vocational College of Nursing, Shandong 271000, China
| | - Dong Li
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Shaokai Sun
- School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300203, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rhee H, Park YN, Choi JY. Advances in Understanding Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vasculature: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment. Korean J Radiol 2024; 25:887-901. [PMID: 39344546 PMCID: PMC11444852 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 07/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progresses through multiple stages of hepatocarcinogenesis, with each stage characterized by specific changes in vascular supply, drainage, and microvascular structure. These vascular changes significantly influence the imaging findings of HCC, enabling non-invasive diagnosis. Vascular changes in HCC are closely related to aggressive histological characteristics and treatment responses. Venous drainage from the tumor toward the portal vein in the surrounding liver facilitates vascular invasion, and the unique microvascular pattern of vessels that encapsulate the tumor cluster (known as a VETC pattern) promotes vascular invasion and metastasis. Systemic treatments for HCC, which are increasingly being used, primarily target angiogenesis and immune checkpoint pathways, which are closely intertwined. By understanding the complex relationship between histopathological vascular changes in hepatocarcinogenesis and their implications for imaging findings, radiologists can enhance the accuracy of imaging diagnosis and improve the prediction of prognosis and treatment response. This, in turn, will ultimately lead to better patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungjin Rhee
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Nyun Park
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Poot AJ, Lapa C, Weber WA, Lam MGEH, Eiber M, Dierks A, Bundschuh RA, Braat AJAT. [ 68Ga]Ga-RAYZ-8009: A Glypican-3-Targeted Diagnostic Radiopharmaceutical for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Molecular Imaging-A First-in-Human Case Series. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1597-1603. [PMID: 39266293 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
To date, the imaging and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rely on CT/MRI, which have well-known limitations. Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a cell surface receptor highly expressed by HCC but not by normal or cirrhotic liver tissue. Here we report initial clinical results of GPC3-targeted PET imaging with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-RYZ-GPC3 (RAYZ-8009), a peptide-based GPC3 ligand in patients with known or suspected HCC. Methods: [68Ga]Ga-RAYZ-8009 was obtained after labeling the peptide precursor with 68Ga from a 68Ge/68Ga generator and heating at 90°C for 10 min followed by sterile filtration. After administration of [68Ga]Ga-RAYZ-8009, a dynamic or static PET/CT scan was acquired between 45 min and 4 h after administration. Radiotracer uptake was measured by SUVs for the following tissues: suspected or actual HCC or hepatoblastoma lesions, non-tumor-bearing liver, renal cortex, blood pool in the left ventricle, and gastric fundus. Additionally, tumor-to-healthy-liver ratios (TLRs) were calculated. Results: Twenty-four patients (5 patients in the dynamic protocol; 19 patients in the static protocol) were scanned. No adverse events occurred. Two patients had no lesion detected and did not have HCC during follow-up. In total, 50 lesions were detected and analyzed. The mean SUVmax of these lesions was 19.6 (range, 2.7-95.3), and the mean SUVmean was 10.1 (range, 1.0-49.2) at approximately 60 min after administration. Uptake in non-tumor-bearing liver and blood pool rapidly decreased over time and became negligible 45 min after administration (mean SUVmean, <1.6), with a continuous decline to 4 h after administration (mean SUVmean, 1.0). The opposite was observed for HCC lesions, for which SUVs and TLRs continuously increased for up to 4 h after administration. In individual lesion analysis, TLR was the highest between 60 and 120 min after administration. Uptake in the gastric fundus gradually increased for up to 45 min (to an SUVmax of 31.3) and decreased gradually afterward. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-RAYZ-8009 is safe and allows for high-contrast imaging of GPC3-positive HCC, with rapid clearance from most normal organs. Thereby, [68Ga]Ga-RAYZ-8009 is promising for HCC diagnosis and staging. Further research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex J Poot
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Alexander Dierks
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralph A Bundschuh
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maung ST, Tanpowpong N, Satja M, Treeprasertsuk S, Chaiteerakij R. Non-contrast abbreviated MRI for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System LR-3 and LR-4 observations in MRI. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1671-1682. [PMID: 39115388 PMCID: PMC11417374 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS With ultrasound sensitivity limited in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and few prospective studies on non-contrast abbreviated MRI (NC-AMRI), this study aimed to assess its diagnostic performance in detecting HCC. METHODS This prospective study involved cirrhotic patients with contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) LR-3 and LR-4 observations detected during HCC surveillance. Patients underwent average 3 complete CE-MRI rounds at 3-6 months interval, with approximately 12-month follow-up. NC-AMRI included diffusion-weighted (DWI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and T1-weighted imaging (T1WI). NC-AMRI protocol images were analysed for diagnostic performance, with subgroup analyses. CE-MRI and NC-AMRI images were independently reviewed by 2 experienced radiologists, with inter-reader agreement assessed with Kappa coefficient. The reference standard was the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-defined presence of arterial hypervascularity and washout during the portal-venous or delayed phases on CE-MRI. RESULTS In 166 CE-MRI follow-ups of 63 patients (median age: 63 years; 60.3% male, 39.7% female), 12 patients developed HCC, with average size of 19.6 mm. The NC-AMRI (DWI + T2WI + T1WI) showed 91.7% sensitivity (95%CI, 61.5-99.8) and 91.6% specificity (95%CI, 86.0-95.4), area under receiver operating characteristic 0.92 (95%CI, 0.83-1.00). Across different Body Mass Index categories, lesion size, Child-Turcotte-Pugh classes, Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grades, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease classes, sensitivity remained consistent. However, specificity differed significantly between ALBI grade 1 and 2 (86.7% vs. 98.4%, P = .010), and between viral and non-viral cirrhosis (93.8% vs. 80.8%, P = .010). CONCLUSIONS NC-AMRI proved clinically feasible, and exhibits high diagnostic performance in HCC detection. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study highlights efficacy of NC-AMRI in detecting HCC among cirrhotic patients with LR-3 and LR-4 observations, representing significant progress in HCC surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soe Thiha Maung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Program in Clinical Sciences (International Program), Graduate Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Department of Clinical Services, Ma Har Myaing Hospital, 308, Pyay Road, Sanchaung Township, Yangon, 11111, Myanmar
| | - Natthaporn Tanpowpong
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Minchanat Satja
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Sombat Treeprasertsuk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Center of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abedrabbo N, Lerner E, Lam E, Kadi D, Dawit H, van der Pol C, Salameh JP, Naringrekar H, Adamo R, Alabousi M, Levis B, Tang A, Alhasan A, Arvind A, Singal A, Allen B, Bartnik K, Podgórska J, Furlan A, Cannella R, Dioguardi Burgio M, Cerny M, Choi SH, Clarke C, Jing X, Kierans A, Ronot M, Rosiak G, Jiang H, Song JS, Reiner CC, Joo I, Kwon H, Wang W, Rao SX, Diaz Telli F, Piñero F, Seo N, Kang HJ, Wang J, Min JH, Costa A, McInnes M, Bashir M. Is concurrent LR-5 associated with a higher rate of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-3 or LR-4 observations? An individual participant data meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04580-6. [PMID: 39333410 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04580-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) does not consider factors extrinsic to the observation of interest, such as concurrent LR-5 observations. PURPOSE To evaluate whether the presence of a concurrent LR-5 observation is associated with a difference in the probability that LR-3 or LR-4 observations represent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. METHODS Multiple databases were searched from 1/2014 to 2/2023 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT/MRI for HCC using LI-RADS v2014/2017/2018. The search strategy, study selection, and data collection process can be found at https://osf.io/rpg8x . Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), IPD were pooled across studies and modeled simultaneously with a one-stage meta-analysis approach to estimate positive predictive value (PPV) of LR-3 and LR-4 observations without and with concurrent LR-5 for the diagnosis of HCC. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). RESULTS Twenty-nine studies comprising 2591 observations in 1456 patients (mean age 59 years, 1083 [74%] male) were included. 587/1960 (29.9%) LR-3 observations in 1009 patients had concurrent LR-5. The PPV for LR-3 observations with concurrent LR-5 was not significantly different from the PPV without LR-5 (45.4% vs 37.1%, p = 0.63). 264/631 (41.8%) LR-4 observations in 447 patients had concurrent LR-5. The PPV for LR-4 observations with concurrent LR-5 was not significantly different from LR-4 observations without concurrent LR-5 (88.6% vs 69.5%, p = 0.08). A sensitivity analysis for low-risk of bias studies (n = 9) did not differ from the primary analysis. CONCLUSION The presence of concurrent LR-5 was not significantly associated with differences in PPV for HCC in LR-3 or LR-4 observations, supporting the current LI-RADS paradigm, wherein the presence of synchronous LR-5 may not alter the categorization of LR-3 and LR-4 observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Lerner
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric Lam
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Diana Kadi
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Christian van der Pol
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - An Tang
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Ashwini Arvind
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Amit Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brian Allen
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Roberto Cannella
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Xiang Jing
- Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | | | | | | | - Hanyu Jiang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ji Soo Song
- Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Ijin Joo
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heejin Kwon
- Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Wentao Wang
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Federico Diaz Telli
- Images and Diagnosis Department, Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Piñero
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nieun Seo
- Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Jin Kang
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Andreu Costa
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ro E, Schooler GR, Morin CE, Khanna G, Towbin AJ. Update on the imaging evaluation of pediatric liver tumors from the ACR Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04565-5. [PMID: 39292279 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04565-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Ro
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
| | - Gary R Schooler
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Cara E Morin
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Geetika Khanna
- Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, USA
| | - Alexander J Towbin
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goins SM, Jiang H, van der Pol CB, Salameh JP, Lam E, Adamo RG, McInnes MDF, Costa AF, Clarke C, Choi SH, Fraum TJ, Ludwig DR, Song B, Joo I, Kierans AS, Kim SY, Kwon H, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, Bashir MR. Comparative Performance of 2018 LI-RADS versus Modified LIRADS (mLI-RADS): An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 60:1082-1091. [PMID: 38038346 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018) is used for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A recently proposed modification (known as mLI-RADS) demonstrated improved sensitivity while maintaining specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of LI-RADS category 5 (definite HCC) for HCC. However, mLI-RADS requires multicenter validation. PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of v2018 and mLI-RADS for liver lesions in a large, heterogeneous, multi-national cohort of patients at risk for HCC. STUDY TYPE Systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD) [Study Protocol: https://osf.io/duys4]. POPULATION 2223 observations from 1817 patients (includes all LI-RADS categories; females = 448, males = 1361, not reported = 8) at elevated risk for developing HCC (based on LI-RADS population criteria) from 12 retrospective studies. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5T and 3T; complete liver MRI with gadoxetate disodium, including axial T2w images and dynamic axial fat-suppressed T1w images precontrast and in the arterial, portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases. Diffusion-weighted imaging was used when available. ASSESSMENT Liver observations were categorized using v2018 and mLI-RADS. The diagnostic performance of each system's category 5 (LR-5 and mLR-5) for HCC were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 (QUADAS-2 was applied to determine risk of bias and applicability. Diagnostic performances were assessed using the likelihood ratio test for sensitivity and specificity and the Wald test for PPV. The significance level was P < 0.05. RESULTS 17% (2/12) of the studies were considered low risk of bias (244 liver observations; 164 patients). When compared to v2018, mLR-5 demonstrated higher sensitivity (61.3% vs. 46.5%, P < 0.001), similar PPV (85.3% vs. 86.3%, P = 0.89), and similar specificity (85.8% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.16) for HCC. DATA CONCLUSION This study confirms mLR-5 has higher sensitivity than LR-5 for HCC identification, while maintaining similar PPV and specificity, validating the mLI-RADS proposal in a heterogeneous, international cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy M Goins
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Salameh
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Lam
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert G Adamo
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- Departments of Radiology and Epidemiology uOttawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Christopher Clarke
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel R Ludwig
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heejin Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Joanna Podgórska
- Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Rosiak
- Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim DH, Choi SH. Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2024; 24:192-205. [PMID: 38616543 PMCID: PMC11449575 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2024.04.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LIRADS v2018, and to explore the causes of poor agreement in LR-M assignment. METHODS Original studies reporting inter-reader agreement for LR-M features on multiphasic CT or MRI were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The pooled kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the study heterogeneity. RESULTS In total, 24 eligible studies with 5,163 hepatic observations were included. The pooled κ values were 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.78) for rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.39-0.65) for peripheral washout, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50-0.70) for delayed central enhancement, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.78) for targetoid restriction, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83) for targetoid transitional phase/hepatobiliary phase appearance, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.78) for infiltrative appearance, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30-0.68) for marked diffusion restriction, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48-0.73) for necrosis or severe ischemia. Substantial study heterogeneity was observed for all LR-M features (Cochran's Q test, P<0.01; I2≥89.2%). Studies with a mean observation size of <3 cm, those performed using 1.5-T MRI, and those with multiple image readers, were significantly associated with poor agreement of LR-M features. CONCLUSIONS The agreement for peripheral washout and marked diffusion restriction was limited. The LI-RADS should focus on improving the agreement of LR-M features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wu X, Feng S, Chang TS, Zhang R, Jaiswal S, Choi EYK, Duan Y, Jiang H, Wang TD. Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an Orthotopic Patient-Derived Xenograft with an Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-Specific Peptide. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2818. [PMID: 39199591 PMCID: PMC11352241 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as a major contributor to the worldwide cancer burden. Improved methods are needed for early cancer detection and image-guided surgery. Peptides have small dimensions that can overcome delivery challenges to achieve high tumor concentrations and deep penetration. We used phage display methods to biopan against the extra-cellular domain of the purified EpCAM protein, and used IRDye800 as a near-infrared (NIR) fluorophore. The 12-mer sequence HPDMFTRTHSHN was identified, and specific binding to EpCAM was validated with HCC cells in vitro. A binding affinity of kd = 67 nM and onset of k = 0.136 min-1 (7.35 min) were determined. Serum stability was measured with a half-life of T1/2 = 2.6 h. NIR fluorescence images showed peak uptake in vivo by human HCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors at 1.5 h post-injection. Also, the peptide was able to bind to foci of local and distant metastases in liver and lung. Peptide biodistribution showed high uptake in tumor versus other organs. No signs of acute toxicity were detected during animal necropsy. Immunofluorescence staining of human liver showed specific binding to HCC compared with cirrhosis, adenoma, and normal specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.F.); (S.J.)
| | - Shuo Feng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.F.); (S.J.)
| | - Tse-Shao Chang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Ruoliu Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Sangeeta Jaiswal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.F.); (S.J.)
| | - Eun-Young K. Choi
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Yuting Duan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (Y.D.); (H.J.)
| | - Hui Jiang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (Y.D.); (H.J.)
| | - Thomas D. Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (X.W.); (S.F.); (S.J.)
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cheung CL, Tripathi V, Chiang CL, Chiu KWH. Impact of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Etiology on the Performance of LI-RADS LR5. Radiology 2024; 312:e240056. [PMID: 39189904 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Lam Cheung
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Block K, 30 Gascoigne Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Vrijesh Tripathi
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of The West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Chi-Leung Chiang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Keith Wan Hang Chiu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Block K, 30 Gascoigne Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chen K, Shuen TWH, Chow PKH. The association between tumour heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical implications. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:420-429. [PMID: 38760445 PMCID: PMC11300599 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02684-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The emergence of combination therapy, atezolizumab (anti-PDL1, immune checkpoint inhibitor) and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) has revolutionised the management of HCC. Despite this breakthrough, the best overall response rate with first-line systemic therapy is only about 30%, owing to intra-tumoural heterogeneity, complex tumour microenvironment and the lack of predictive biomarkers. Many groups have attempted to classify HCC based on the immune microenvironment and have consistently observed better outcomes in immunologically "hot" HCC. We summarised possible mechanisms of tumour immune evasion based on the latest literature and the rationale for combination/sequential therapy to improve treatment response. Lastly, we proposed future strategies and therapies to overcome HCC immune evasion to further improve treatment outcomes of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaina Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Timothy W H Shuen
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary and Transplant Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
- Program in Translational and Clinical Liver Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu Y, Xiao Y, Ni X, Huang P, Wu F, Zhou C, Xu J, Zeng M, Yang C. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of LR‑3 and LR-4 lesions coexisting with hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:2629-2638. [PMID: 38834779 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04338-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore which preoperative clinical data and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features may indicate the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HCC patients coexisting with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions. METHODS HCC Patients coexisting with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions who participated in a prospective clinical trial (XX) were included in this study. Two radiologists independently assessed the preoperative MRI features and each lesion was assigned according to the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). The preoperative clinical data were also evaluated. The relative values of these parameters were assessed as potential predictors of HCC for coexisting LR-3 and LR-4 lesions. RESULTS We enrolled 102 HCC patients (58.1 ± 11.5 years; 84.3% males) coexisting with 110 LR-3 and LR-4 lesions (HCCs group [n = 66]; non-HCCs group [n = 44]). The presence of restricted diffusion (OR: 18.590, p < 0.001), delayed enhancement (OR: 0.113, p < 0.001), and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR: 3.084, p = 0.048) were found to be independent predictors of HCC diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the above independent variables for the diagnosis of HCC ranged from 66.7 to 80.3% and 56.8 to 88.6%, respectively. ROC analysis showed that, in discriminating HCC, the AUCs of the above factors were 0.777, 0.686, and 0.670, respectively. Combining these three findings for the prediction of HCC resulted in a specificity greater than 97%, and the AUC further increased to 0.874. CONCLUSION The presence of restricted diffusion, delayed enhancement, and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity can be useful features for risk stratification of coexisting LR-3 and LR-4 lesions in HCC patients. Trial registration a prospective clinical trial (ChiCTR2000036201).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, No. 1 Lijiang Road, Suzhou, 215153, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yuyao Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaoyan Ni
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Changwu Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, No. 1 Lijiang Road, Suzhou, 215153, Jiangsu, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tapper EB, Goldberg D, Parikh ND, Terrault NA, Welch N, Sharpton S, Hameed B, Khalili M, Stolz A, Verna EC, Brown RS, Sanyal AJ, VanWagner L, Ladner DP, Moylan CA, Diehl AM, Jones PD, Loomba RC, Dasarathy S, Simonetto DA, Shah VH, Bajaj JS. The Liver Cirrhosis Network Cohort Study: Cirrhosis Definition, Study Population, and Endpoints. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01263. [PMID: 39018024 PMCID: PMC11739427 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One of the primary goals of the Liver Cirrhosis Network (LCN) is to develop a cohort study to better understand and predict the risk of hepatic decompensation and other clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with Child A cirrhosis. METHODS The LCN consists of a Scientific Data Coordinating Center and 10 clinical centers whose investigators populate multiple committees. The LCN Definitions and Measurements Committee developed preliminary definitions of cirrhosis and its complications by literature review, expert opinion, and reviewing definition documents developed by other organizations. The Cohort Committee developed the study protocol with the input of the steering committee. RESULTS The LCN developed a prospective cohort study to describe and predict the rates of incident clinical events pertaining to first decompensation and patient-reported outcomes. The LCN developed a pragmatic definition of compensated cirrhosis incorporating clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histological criteria. Definitions of incident and recompensated ascites, overt hepatic encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage, bleeding because of portal gastropathy, and hepatocellular carcinoma were also codified. DISCUSSION The LCN Cohort Study design will inform the natural history of cirrhosis in contemporary patients with compensated cirrhosis. The LCN Definitions and Measures Committee developed criteria for the definition of cirrhosis to standardize entry into this multicenter cohort study and standardized criteria for liver-related outcome measures. This effort has produced definitions intended to be both sensitive and specific as well as easily operationalized by study staff such that outcomes critical to the LCN cohort are identified and reported in an accurate and generalizable fashion. REGISTRATION NCT05740358.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot B. Tapper
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University
| | - David Goldberg
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan
| | - Norah A. Terrault
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck Medicine of University of Southern California
| | - Nicole Welch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic
| | - Suzanne Sharpton
- NAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego
| | - Bilal Hameed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California-San Francisco
| | - Mandana Khalili
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California-San Francisco
| | - Andrew Stolz
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck Medicine of University of Southern California
| | | | - Robert S. Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine
| | - Arun J. Sanyal
- Division of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center
| | - Lisa VanWagner
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Daniela P. Ladner
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University
| | - Cynthia A. Moylan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Anna Mae Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Patricia D. Jones
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
| | - Rohit C. Loomba
- NAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego
| | | | | | - Vijay H. Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester
| | - Jasmohan S Bajaj
- Division of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liang J, Li PY, Norman J, Lauzon M, Yeo YH, Trivedi H, Ayoub WS, Kuo A, Friedman ML, Sankar K, Gong J, Osipov A, Hendifar A, Todo T, Kim I, Voidonikolas G, Brennan TV, Wisel SA, Steggarda J, Kosari K, Saouaf R, Nissen N, Yao F, Mehta N, Yang JD. Development and validation of a biomarker index for HCC treatment response. Hepatol Commun 2024; 8:e0466. [PMID: 38896084 PMCID: PMC11186807 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum AFP-L3%, AFP, and DCP are useful biomarkers for HCC detection, but their utility in assessing treatment response remains unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of a biomarker model in the detection of posttreatment viable tumors. METHODS For model derivation, recipients with HCC undergoing liver transplant from 2018 to 2022 who had biomarkers collected within 3 months before transplant were included. We developed a generalized linear model for detecting posttreatment viable tumors with the 3 biomarkers as covariates, which we termed the "LAD Score." An independent cohort of 117 patients with HCC was used for external validation. RESULTS Among 205 recipients of transplant, 70.2% had evidence of viable tumor on explant. The median LAD score was higher among patients with viable versus nonviable tumors (1.06 vs. 0.465, p < 0.001). The LAD score had a sensitivity of 55.6% and a specificity of 85.1% at the cutoff of 0.927, which was more accurate than imaging for detecting posttreatment viable tumors (AUROC 0.736 vs. 0.643, respectively; p = 0.045). The superior performance of the LAD score over imaging is primarily driven by its greater accuracy in detecting tumors <2 cm in diameter (AUROC of the LAD score 0.721 vs. imaging 0.595, p = 0.02). In the validation data set, the LAD score had an AUROC of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.911) with a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 89.4% at the cutoff of 0.927. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest the utility of LAD score in treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy for HCC, particularly in detecting small tumors. A larger prospective study is in progress to validate its accuracy and evaluate its performance in recurrence monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff Liang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Po-Yi Li
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joshua Norman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Marie Lauzon
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yee Hui Yeo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hirsh Trivedi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Walid S. Ayoub
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alexander Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marc L. Friedman
- Department of Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kamya Sankar
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jun Gong
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Arsen Osipov
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Todo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Georgios Voidonikolas
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Todd V. Brennan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Steven A. Wisel
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Justin Steggarda
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kambiz Kosari
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rola Saouaf
- Department of Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Nissen
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Francis Yao
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Xu X, Liu Y, Liu Y, Yu Y, Yang M, Lu L, Chan L, Liu B. Functional hydrogels for hepatocellular carcinoma: therapy, imaging, and in vitro model. J Nanobiotechnology 2024; 22:381. [PMID: 38951911 PMCID: PMC11218144 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02547-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common malignancies worldwide and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality, posing a serious threat to human health. Interventional embolization therapy is the main treatment against middle- and late-stage liver cancer, but its efficacy is limited by the performance of embolism, hence the new embolic materials have provided hope to the inoperable patients. Especially, hydrogel materials with high embolization strength, appropriate viscosity, reliable security and multifunctionality are widely used as embolic materials, and can improve the efficacy of interventional therapy. In this review, we have described the status of research on hydrogels and challenges in the field of HCC therapy. First, various preparation methods of hydrogels through different cross-linking methods are introduced, then the functions of hydrogels related to HCC are summarized, including different HCC therapies, various imaging techniques, in vitro 3D models, and the shortcomings and prospects of the proposed applications are discussed in relation to HCC. We hope that this review is informative for readers interested in multifunctional hydrogels and will help researchers develop more novel embolic materials for interventional therapy of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Xu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Yanyan Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Yahan Yu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingqi Yang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Ligong Lu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Leung Chan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Bing Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
- Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 510006, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van der Pol CB, Costa AF, Lam E, Dawit H, Bashir MR, McInnes MDF. Best Practice for MRI Diagnostic Accuracy Research With Lessons and Examples from the LI-RADS Individual Participant Data Group. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 60:21-28. [PMID: 37818955 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical imaging diagnostic test accuracy research is strengthened by adhering to best practices for study design, data collection, data documentation, and study reporting. In this review, key elements of such research are discussed, and specific recommendations provided for optimizing diagnostic accuracy study execution to improve uniformity, minimize common sources of bias and avoid potential pitfalls. Examples are provided regarding study methodology and data collection practices based on insights gained by the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) individual participant data group, who have evaluated raw data from numerous MRI diagnostic accuracy studies for risk of bias and data integrity. The goal of this review is to outline strategies for investigators to improve research practices, and to help reviewers and readers better contextualize a study's findings while understanding its limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian B van der Pol
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Eric Lam
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Haben Dawit
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Rm c-159 Departments of Radiology and Epidemiology, The Ottawa Hospital-Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Telli FD, Hidalgo JMP, Varón A, Castro L, Tapia NC, Piñero F. Key points for imaging diagnosis and response assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America. Ann Hepatol 2024; 29:101514. [PMID: 38944462 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Diaz Telli
- Department of Radiology, Austral University Hospital, Austral University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Adriana Varón
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, La Cardio Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Lorena Castro
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Clinca Los Andes, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Norberto Chavez Tapia
- Gastroenterology, Translational Department, Research and Ethical Committee, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Federico Piñero
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Austral University Hospital, Austral University, Buenos Aires, Argentina..
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yao S, Wei Y, Ye Z, Chen J, Duan T, Zhang Z, Song B. Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:2060-2070. [PMID: 34121266 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical practice, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is widely diagnosed by using MRI, however, whether the imaging features are affected by hepatic steatosis (HS) is still unknown. PURPOSE To investigate and compare the differences in HCC related imaging features between with- and without-HS groups, and to further determine whether HS affects the diagnosis accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 of HCC in MRI. STUDY TYPE Prospective. SUBJECTS One hundred and seventy-one patients (mean age, 52 ± 11 years; range, 26-83 years) including 137 men and 34 women. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3.0 T, gradient echo (GRE). ASSESSMENT Subjects were classified as HS and non-HS groups according to MRI-proton density fat-fraction (PDFF). HS was defined as MRI-PDFF >5.6%. Three radiologists accessed HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories in MRI independently based on LI-RADS v2018. Frequencies of HCC major features and LR categorization assignment between the two groups as well as interobserver agreement between the two radiologists were assessed. STATISTICAL TESTS Unpaired t-test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, kappa statistic, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS Major features including arterial hyperenhancement (APHE), enhancing "capsule" and nonperipheral "washout" observed between HS and non-HS groups were not significantly different (78.95% vs.78.62%, P = 0.866; 57.89% vs.52.98%, P = 0.483; and 75% vs.81.46%, P = 0.257, respectively), and the assessment of observation size showed a borderline difference (P = 0.059). No significant difference in LR-5 assignment between the two groups (69.74% vs. 72.85% for reader 1, P = 0.641; 71.05% vs. 72.19% for reader 2, P = 0.877). Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists showed almost perfect in LR-5 assignment (κ = 0.869) and size observation (ICC = 0.997). DATA CONCLUSION The diagnosis of HCC based on LI-RADS v2018 in MRI is of comparable performance regardless of HS, in which there is no significant difference in either the major imaging features or LR categorization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Yao
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zheng Ye
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Duan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Al-Hasan M, Mehta N, Yang JD, Singal AG. Role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of HCC. Liver Transpl 2024:01445473-990000000-00379. [PMID: 38738964 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
For many cancers, biomarkers have served as an important tool across the cancer care continuum from risk stratification and early detection to diagnosis and treatment. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) remains one of the few validated biomarkers for patients with HCC. Although AFP has shown potential for each of these steps, its performance, when used alone, has often been suboptimal. There continue to be discordant recommendations about AFP's value when combined with ultrasound for surveillance, as well as its role in diagnostic algorithms. Conversely, high AFP levels are associated with aggressive tumor biology and survival, so it remains a key factor for the selection of candidates for liver transplant. There have been immense efforts to identify and validate additional biomarkers for each of these steps in the HCC care continuum. Indeed, biomarker panels have shown promising data for HCC risk stratification and surveillance among patients with cirrhosis, as well as prognostication and detection of minimal residual disease in patients undergoing HCC treatment. Several large prospective studies are currently ongoing to evaluate the role of these emerging biomarkers in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Al-Hasan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Teufel A, Kudo M, Qian Y, Daza J, Rodriguez I, Reissfelder C, Ridruejo E, Ebert MP. Current Trends and Advancements in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis 2024; 42:349-360. [PMID: 38599204 DOI: 10.1159/000538815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health burden with a high mortality rate. Over the past 40 years, significant progress has been achieved in the prevention and management of HCC. SUMMARY Hepatitis B vaccination programs, the development of direct acting antiviral drugs for Hepatitis C, and effective surveillance strategies provide a profound basis for the prevention of HCC. Advanced surgery and liver transplantation along with local ablation techniques potentially offer cure for the disease. Also, just recently, the introduction of immunotherapy opened a new chapter in systemic treatment. Finally, the introduction of the BCLC classification system for HCC, clearly defining patient groups and assigning reasonable treatment options, has standardized treatment and become the basis of almost all clinical trials for HCC. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of HCC management and also touch on current challenges. KEY MESSAGE A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for effective HCC management. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to further enhance treatment options and will ultimately reduce the global burden of this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Teufel
- Division of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuquan Qian
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jimmy Daza
- Division of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Isaac Rodriguez
- Division of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ezequiel Ridruejo
- Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, Center for Medical Education and Clinical Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matthias P Ebert
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lim YT, Low HM, Tan CH. Referring clinicians' knowledge, attitudes and practice towards international guidelines for liver cancer diagnosis in Singapore. Singapore Med J 2024; 65:302-307. [PMID: 35851649 PMCID: PMC11182456 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2022092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ting Lim
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Hsien Min Low
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cher Heng Tan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huang R, Zheng C, Xu G, Chen X, Shen J, Mao S. A Modified Targetoid Feature Emphasizing Thin-Rim APHE to Improve the Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS for Malignant Hepatic Tumors. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:775-786. [PMID: 38689802 PMCID: PMC11060173 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s448257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify imaging features that help distinguish between HCCs and non-HCC malignancies assigned to LI-RADS M (LR-M) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a LI-RADS with targetoid criteria using thin-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 381 patients (387 observations) at high-risk for HCC who underwent enhanced-MRI before surgery. Three radiologists reviewed images for LI-RADS categorization of hepatic observations. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine reliable features to differentiate between HCC and non-HCC malignancies among the LR-M lesions. The thin-rim (<30%) APHE was defined based on the thickest thickness of rim APHE compared with the tumor radius, and a modified LI-RADS emphasizing thin-rim APHE as a specific feature of LR-M was established. We compared the diagnostic performance of modified LR-M and LI-RADS 5 (LR-5) with the conventional one. Results Thin-rim APHE and targetoid diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were found as independent predictive factors of non-HCC malignancies, while enhancing capsule, thick-rim APHE and peripheral washout were noted as independent variables significantly associated with HCC of LR-M (P<0.05). The noticeable diagnostic performance of thin-rim APHE in distinguishing non-HCC malignancies from HCCs using the ROC curve. Emphasizing thin-rim APHE on targetoid features, the modified LR-M revealed significantly superior specificity and accuracy (89.4% vs 81.1%, P=0.004; and 87.9% vs 82.2%, P=0.027, respectively) while maintaining high sensitivity (82.2% vs 86.0%; P=0.529) compared with the LR-M. Meanwhile, the modified LR-5 achieved greater sensitivity and accuracy (88.6% vs 79.7%, P=0.004; and 85.8% vs 80.1%, P=0.036, respectively) for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity (78.3% vs.81.1%; P=0.608) compared with the LR-5. Conclusion Thin-rim APHE may be the specific imaging feature for differentiating non-HCC malignancies from HCCs within LR-M. The modified targetoid criteria emphasizing thin-rim APHE can improve the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for hepatic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runqian Huang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chunling Zheng
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guixiao Xu
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xuanwei Chen
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jingxian Shen
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Siyue Mao
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chiu KWH, Tan KV, Yang X, Zhu X, Shi J, Chiang CL, Chan L, Hui Y, Khong PL, Man K, Wong JWH. Prognostic PET [ 11C]-acetate uptake is associated with hypoxia gene expression in patients with late-stage hepatocellular carcinoma - a bench to bed study. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:42. [PMID: 38520026 PMCID: PMC10958914 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00685-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with combined [18F]-FDG and [11C]-acetate (dual-tracer) is used for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, although its prognostic value and underlying molecular mechanism remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that radiotracer uptake might be associated with tumor hypoxia and validated our findings in public and local human HCC cohorts. METHODS Twelve orthotopic HCC xenografts were established using MHCC97L cells in female nude mice, with 5 having undergone hepatic artery ligation (HAL) to create tumor hypoxia in vivo. Tumors in both Control and HAL-treated xenografts were imaged with [11C]-acetate and [18F]-FDG PET-MR and RNA sequencing was performed on the resected tumors. Semiquantitative analysis of PET findings was then performed, and the findings were then validated on the Cancer Genome Atlas Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) cohort and patients from our institution. RESULTS HAL-treated mice showed lower [11C]-acetate (HAL-treated vs. Control, tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (SUVTLR): 2.14[2.05-2.21] vs 3.11[2.75-5.43], p = 0.02) but not [18F]-FDG (HAL-treated vs. Control, SUVTLR: 3.73[3.12-4.35] vs 3.86[3.7-5.29], p = 0.83) tumor uptakes. Gene expression analysis showed the PET phenotype is associated with upregulation of hallmark hypoxia signature. The prognostic value of the hypoxia gene signature was tested on the TCGA-LIHC cohort with upregulation of hypoxia gene signature associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in late-stage (stage III and IV) HCC patients (n = 66, OS 2.05 vs 1.67 years, p = 0.046). Using a local cohort of late-stage HCC patients who underwent dual-tracer PET-CT, tumors without [11C]-acetate uptake are associated with poorer prognosis (n = 51, OS 0.25 versus 1.21 years, p < 0.0001) and multivariable analyses showed [11C]-acetate tumor uptake as an independent predictor of OS (HR 0.17 95%C 0.06-0.42, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS [11C]-acetate uptake is associated with alteration of tumor hypoxia gene expression and poorer prognosis in patients with advanced HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Wan Hang Chiu
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Kel Vin Tan
- Department of Oncology, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Xinxiang Yang
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Zhu
- School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jingjing Shi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi-Leung Chiang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lawrence Chan
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yuan Hui
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pek-Lan Khong
- Clinical Imaging Research Center (CIRC), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kwan Man
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jason Wing Hon Wong
- School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lee S, Kim YY, Shin J, Roh YH, Choi JY, Chernyak V, Sirlin CB. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1502-1514. [PMID: 37656177 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10134-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We performed an updated meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) 5 category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018), and to evaluate differences by imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material. METHODS The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 using v2018 for diagnosing HCC. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material. RESULTS Forty-eight studies qualified for the meta-analysis, comprising 9031 patients, 10,547 observations, and 7216 HCCs. The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC were 66% (95% CI, 61-70%) and 91% (95% CI, 89-93%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, MRI with extracellular agent (ECA-MRI) showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (77% [95% CI, 70-82%]) than CT (66% [95% CI, 58-73%]; p = 0.023) or MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI) (65% [95% CI, 60-70%]; p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ECA-MRI and MRI with gadobenate (gadobenate-MRI) (73% [95% CI, 61-82%]; p = 0.495). Pooled specificities were 88% (95% CI, 80-93%) for CT, 92% (95% CI, 86-95%) for ECA-MRI, 93% (95% CI, 91-95%) for Gx-MRI, and 91% (95% CI, 84-95%) for gadobenate-MRI without significant differences (p = 0.084-0.803). CONCLUSIONS LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material, while ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT or Gx-MRI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Refinement of the criteria for improving sensitivity while maintaining high specificity of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis may be an essential future direction. KEY POINTS • The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using LI-RADSv2018 were 66% and 91%, respectively. • ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT (77% vs 66%, p = 0.023) or Gx-MRI (77% vs 65%, p = 0.001). • LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity (88-93%) for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yeun-Yoon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Ho Roh
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Furlan A, Dasyam N, Buros C, Thompson CP, Minervini MI, Kierans AS. Use of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy for Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS) observations: A retrospective study from two liver transplant centers. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2024; 53:235-238. [PMID: 38171969 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Since the adoption of guidelines for the non-invasive imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the need for sampling of a lesion in cirrhosis has decreased. We aimed to retrospectively investigate the use of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy for LI-RADS observations in cirrhosis in two large liver transplant centers. A review of the pathology database in the two Institutions (Institution A, Institution B) was conducted to identify patients that underwent percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy for a liver lesion in the interval time 01/01/2015-12/312020. Liver observations on pre-procedure contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were classified according to LI-RADS v2018. Among the 728 patients who underwent imaging guided biopsy of a liver lesion in Institution A, and among the 749 patients who underwent imaging guided biopsy of a liver lesion in Institution B, respectively 50 (6.8 %) and 16 (2.1 %) were cirrhotic with available pre-procedural contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. A total of 67 lesions were biopsied. 30/67 (45 %) biopsied observations were classified as LR-M. 55/67 (82 %) biopsies were positive for malignancy at histopathology and among them 33 (60 %) were HCC. In conclusion, a small percentage of percutaneous, imaging-guided biopsies for liver lesions are performed in cirrhosis, and more frequently for LR-M observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Furlan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | - Navya Dasyam
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Christopher Buros
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | - Marta I Minervini
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Siobhan Kierans
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Weill Greenberg Center, 1305 York Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Suhail Najm Alareer H, Arian A, Fotouhi M, Taher HJ, Dinar Abdullah A. Evidence Supporting Diagnostic Value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Biomed Phys Eng 2024; 14:5-20. [PMID: 38357604 PMCID: PMC10862115 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Based on the Liver Imaging Data and Reporting System (LI-RADS) guidelines, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed using imaging criteria in patients at risk of HCC. Objective This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of LI-RADS in high-risk patients with HCC. Material and Methods This systematic review is conducted on international databases, including Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PROQUEST, and Cochrane Library, with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated, and all the data were analyzed using STATA version 16. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined using a random-effects meta-analysis approach. Also, we used the chi-squared test and I2 index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and Funnel plots and Egger tests were used for evaluating publication bias. Results The pooled sensitivity was estimated at 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). According to different types of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS), the highest pooled sensitivity was in version 2018 (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) (I2: 80.6%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001). The pooled specificity was estimated as 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92). According to different types of LI-RADS, the highest pooled specificity was in version 2014 (93.0 (95% CI 89.0-96.0) (I2: 81.7%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001). Conclusion LI-RADS can assist radiologists in achieving the required sensitivity and specificity in high-risk patients suspected to have HCC. Therefore, this strategy can serve as an appropriate tool for identifying HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayder Suhail Najm Alareer
- Department of Radiology, College of Health and Medical Technology, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, 64001, Iraq
| | - Arvin Arian
- Cancer Institute ADIR, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Fotouhi
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group (QMISG), Research Centre for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ayoob Dinar Abdullah
- Department of Radiology Technology, Al-Manara College for Medical Sciences, Missan, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dawit H, Lam E, McInnes MDF, van der Pol CB, Bashir MR, Salameh JP, Levis B, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V, Choi SH, Kim SY, Fraum TJ, Tang A, Jiang H, Song B, Wang J, Wilson SR, Kwon H, Kierans AS, Joo I, Ronot M, Song JS, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, Kang Z, Allen BC, Costa AF. LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Feature Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Malignancy: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2024; 310:e231501. [PMID: 38376399 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Background The independent contribution of each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT or MRI ancillary feature (AF) has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the association of LI-RADS AFs with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and malignancy while adjusting for LI-RADS major features through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched from January 2014 to January 2022 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for HCC using LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. Using a one-step approach, IPD across studies were pooled. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariable logistic regression models of each AF combined with major features except threshold growth (excluded because of infrequent reporting). Liver observation clustering was addressed at the study and participant levels through random intercepts. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results Twenty studies comprising 3091 observations (2456 adult participants; mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1849 [75.3%] men) were included. In total, 89% (eight of nine) of AFs favoring malignancy were associated with malignancy and/or HCC, 80% (four of five) of AFs favoring HCC were associated with HCC, and 57% (four of seven) of AFs favoring benignity were negatively associated with HCC and/or malignancy. Nonenhancing capsule (OR = 3.50 [95% CI: 1.53, 8.01]) had the strongest association with HCC. Diffusion restriction (OR = 14.45 [95% CI: 9.82, 21.27]) and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR = 10.18 [95% CI: 7.17, 14.44]) had the strongest association with malignancy. The strongest negative associations with HCC were parallels blood pool enhancement (OR = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.49]) and marked T2 hyperintensity (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.45]). Seventeen studies (85%) had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Most LI-RADS AFs were independently associated with HCC, malignancy, or benignity as intended when adjusting for major features. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Crivellaro in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haben Dawit
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Eric Lam
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Jean-Paul Salameh
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Brooke Levis
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - So Yeon Kim
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Bin Song
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Jin Wang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Stephanie R Wilson
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Heejin Kwon
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Andrea S Kierans
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Ijin Joo
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Maxime Ronot
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Ji Soo Song
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Joanna Podgórska
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Grzegorz Rosiak
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Zhen Kang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Brian C Allen
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Andreu F Costa
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
McEneaney LJ, Vithayathil M, Khan S. Screening, Surveillance, and Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY ‐ A CRITICAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM APPROACH 2E 2024:271-290. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119756422.ch16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
45
|
Kim TH, Woo S. How Systematic Review Can Shape Clinical Practice in Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2329603. [PMID: 37493323 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Systematic reviews offer radiologists a comprehensive synthesis of all relevant evidence pertaining to a specific question, aiding them in shaping their clinical practices. It is crucial for radiologists to familiarize themselves with the methods used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses and to understand the limitations. By doing so, they can effectively appraise and interpret results, enabling them to make informed decisions based on the evidence provided in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae-Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Min JH, Lee MW, Rhim H, Han S, Song KD, Kang TW, Jeong WK, Cha DI, Kim JM, Choi GS, Kim K. LI-RADS category is associated with treatment outcomes of small single HCC: surgical resection vs. radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:525-537. [PMID: 37526668 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09998-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category is associated with the treatment outcomes of small single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS This retrospective study included 357 patients who underwent SR (n = 209) or RFA (n = 148) for a single HCC of ≤ 3 cm between 2014 and 2016. LI-RADS categories were assigned. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates after treatment were compared according to the LI-RADS category (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors for treatment outcomes were assessed. RESULTS In total, 357 patients (mean age, 59 years; men, 272) with 357 HCCs (294 LR-4/5 and 63 LR-M) were included. After PSM (n = 78 in each treatment group), there were 10 and 11 LR-M HCCs in the SR and RFA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or RFS. However, SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA (1.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.001). SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for LR-M HCCs (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and LR-4/5 HCCs (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION LI-RADS classification is associated with the treatment outcome of HCC, supporting favorable outcomes of SR over RFA for LTP, especially for HCCs categorized as LR-M. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category has a potential prognostic role, supporting favorable outcomes of surgical resection over radiofrequency ablation for local tumor progression, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma categorized as LR-M. KEY POINTS • SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for HCCs categorized as LR-M (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and HCCs categorized as LR-4/5 (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). • There is a steeply increased risk of LTP within 1 year after RFA for LR-M HCCs, compared to SR. • The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (HR 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032) in patients with HCC of ≤ 3 cm treated with SR or RFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Woo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hyunchul Rhim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungchul Han
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung Doo Song
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Wook Kang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Kyoung Jeong
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Ik Cha
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sheng R, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhang W, Jin K, Sun W, Dai Y, Zhou J, Zeng M. A multi-center diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI and clinical features. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:548-559. [PMID: 37552257 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10002-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish a non-invasive diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) via decision tree analysis. METHODS Totally 1008 patients with 504 pathologically confirmed IMCCs and proportional hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinomas (cHCC-CC) from multi-centers were retrospectively included (internal cohort n = 700, external cohort n = 308). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to evaluate the independent clinical and MRI predictors for IMCC, and the selected features were used to develop a decision tree-based diagnostic system. Diagnostic efficacy of the established system was calculated by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the internal training-testing and external validation cohorts, and also in small lesions ≤ 3 cm. RESULTS Multivariate analysis revealed that female, no chronic liver disease or cirrhosis, elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, normal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, lobulated tumor shape, progressive or persistent enhancement pattern, no enhancing tumor capsule, targetoid appearance, and liver surface retraction were independent characteristics favoring the diagnosis of IMCC over HCC or cHCC-CC (odds ratio = 3.273-25.00, p < 0.001 to p = 0.021). Among which enhancement pattern had the highest weight of 0.816. The diagnostic system incorporating significant characteristics above showed excellent performance in the internal training (area under the curve (AUC) 0.971), internal testing (AUC 0.956), and external validation (AUC 0.945) cohorts, as well as in small lesions ≤ 3 cm (AUC 0.956). CONCLUSIONS In consideration of the great generalizability and clinical efficacy in multi-centers, the proposed diagnostic system may serve as a non-invasive, reliable, and easy-to-operate tool in IMCC diagnosis, providing an efficient approach to discriminate IMCC from other HCC-containing primary liver cancers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study established a non-invasive, easy-to-operate, and explainable decision tree-based diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, which may provide essential information for clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS • Distinguishing intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) from other primary liver cancers is important for both treatment planning and outcome prediction. • The MRI-based diagnostic system showed great performance with satisfying generalization ability in the diagnosis and discrimination of IMCC. • The diagnostic system may serve as a non-invasive, easy-to-operate, and explainable tool in the diagnosis and risk stratification for IMCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruofan Sheng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, No. 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen, 361015, Fujian, China
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yunfei Zhang
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, 201800, China
| | - Heqing Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, No. 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen, 361015, Fujian, China
| | - Weiguo Zhang
- Dushu Lake Public Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, 215028, China
| | - Kaipu Jin
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yongming Dai
- Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, 201800, China
| | - Jianjun Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, No. 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen, 361015, Fujian, China.
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty for Radiology, Xiamen, 361015, China.
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
García-Criado Á, Bruix J. Screening for liver cancer: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Hepatology 2024; 79:12-14. [PMID: 37505215 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ángeles García-Criado
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Liver Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Liver Oncology Unit, Liver Unit, ICMDM, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brusset B, Jacquemin M, Teyssier Y, Roth GS, Sturm N, Roustit M, Bône A, Ghelfi J, Costentin CE, Decaens T. Radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma does not preclude biopsy before treatment. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:100957. [PMID: 38234407 PMCID: PMC10792651 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis relies on non-invasive criteria based on international guidelines. The advent of systemic therapies warrants reconsideration of the role of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of HCC. Accordingly, we investigated the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS 2018 and the AASLD 2011 criteria. Methods Consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent a biopsy for suspected HCC between 2015 and 2020 were included. The available imaging studies (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) were blindly reviewed by two independent radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed for LI-RADS, AASLD, and biopsies. Results In total, 167 patients underwent both available biopsy and imaging. Of the 137 relevant biopsies, 114 patients had HCC (83.2%), 12 (9%) had non-HCC malignant lesions, and 11 (8%) had benign nodules. The PPV and NPV of the biopsies were 100% and 62%, respectively; 30 biopsies were non-contributive. The PPV and NPV of the LI-RADS categories were 89% and 32.8% for LR-5 and 85.5% and 54.5% for LR-4 + 5 + TIV, respectively. The PPV and NPV of the 2011 AASLD criteria were 93.2% and 35.6%, respectively. The interobserver kappa (k = 0.380) for the LR-5 categories was reasonable. Of 100 LR-5 nodules, 11 were misclassified, in particular one case was a colorectal metastasis, and two cases were cholangiocarcinomas, of which nine were identified through biopsy, whereas six were correctly classified according to LI-RADS (LR-M or LR-TIV). Fifty percent of macrotrabecular HCC and 48.4% of poorly differentiated HCC (Edmonson 3 and 4) were not classified as LR-5. Conclusions LI-RADS 2018 did not outperform the AASLD 2011 score as a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC. Tumor biopsy allowed restoration of an accurate diagnosis in 11% of LR-5 cases. A combined radiological and histological diagnosis should be considered mandatory for good treatment assessment. Impact and Implications Although biopsy is not required for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis when the LI-RADS criteria are met according to current guidelines, our study underscores the limits of radiology and the need for biopsy when hepatocellular carcinoma is suspected. Histological findings could change therapeutics of liver tumors even if only for a small proportion of patients. Histological proof of the type of cancer is a standard in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bleuenn Brusset
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et d'oncologie digestive, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Marion Jacquemin
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et d'oncologie digestive, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Yann Teyssier
- Radiology Department, Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Gaël S. Roth
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et d'oncologie digestive, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences-INSERM U1209/CNRS UMR, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Nathalie Sturm
- Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Matthieu Roustit
- Centre d’Investigation Clinique, Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Julien Ghelfi
- Radiology Department, Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences-INSERM U1209/CNRS UMR, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Charlotte E. Costentin
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et d'oncologie digestive, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences-INSERM U1209/CNRS UMR, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Decaens
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et d'oncologie digestive, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences-INSERM U1209/CNRS UMR, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Xing F, Zhang T, Miao X, Lu J, Du S, Jiang J, Xing W. Long-term evolution of LR-2, LR-3 and LR-4 observations in HBV-related cirrhosis based on LI-RADS v2018 using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3703-3713. [PMID: 37740759 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04016-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the long-term evolution of LR-2, LR-3 and LR-4 observations in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis based on LI-RADS v2018 and identify predictors of progression to a malignant category on serial gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI). METHODS This retrospective study included 179 cirrhosis patients with untreated indeterminate observations who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI exams at baseline and during the follow-up period between June 2016 and December 2021. Two radiologists independently assessed the major features, ancillary features, and LI-RADS category of each observation at baseline and follow-up. In cases of disagreement, a third radiologist was consulted for consensus. Cumulative incidences for progression to a malignant category (LR-5 or LR-M) and to LR-4 or higher were analyzed for each index category using Kaplan‒Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests. The risk factors for malignant progression were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS A total of 213 observations, including 74 (34.7%) LR-2, 95 (44.6%) LR-3, and 44 (20.7%) LR-4, were evaluated. The overall cumulative incidence of progression to a malignant category was significantly higher for LR-4 observations than for LR-3 or LR-2 observations (each P < 0.001), and significantly higher for LR-3 observations than for LR-2 observations (P < 0.001); at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, the cumulative incidence of progression to a malignant category was 11.4%, 29.5%, and 39.3% for LR-4 observations, 0.0%, 8.5%, and 19.6% for LR-3 observations, and 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% for LR-2 observations, respectively. The cumulative incidence of progression to LR-4 or higher was higher for LR-3 observations than for LR-2 observations (P < 0.001); at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, the cumulative incidence of progression to LR-4 or higher was 0.0%, 8.5%, and 24.6% for LR-3 observations, and 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% for LR-2 observations, respectively. In multivariable analysis, nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.13, 95% CI 1.04-4.36; P = 0.038], threshold growth (HR = 6.50, 95% CI 2.88-14.65; P <0.001), and HBP hypointensity (HR = 16.83, 95% CI 3.97-71.34; P <0.001) were significant independent predictors of malignant progression. CONCLUSION The higher LI-RADS v2018 categories had an increasing risk of progression to a malignant category during long-term evolution. Nonrim APHE, threshold growth, and HBP hypointensity were the imaging features that were significantly predictive of malignant progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Xing
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.185 Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 youth middle road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 youth middle road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaofen Miao
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 youth middle road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiang Lu
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 youth middle road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shen Du
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 youth middle road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jifeng Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 youth middle road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Xing
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.185 Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|