Variation in tracheal reintubations among patients undergoing cardiac surgery across Washington state hospitals

External validation of a predictive model for reintubation after cardiac surgery: A retrospective, observational study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Explore validation of a model to predict patients' risk of failing extubation, to help providers make informed, data-driven decisions regarding the optimal timing of extubation.

DESIGN

We performed temporal, geographic, and domain validations of a model for the risk of reintubation after cardiac surgery by assessing its performance on data sets from three academic medical centers, with temporal validation using data from the institution where the model was developed.

SETTING

Three academic medical centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

Adult patients arriving in the cardiac intensive care unit with an endotracheal tube in place after cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and concordance statistics were used as measures of discriminative ability, and calibration curves and Brier scores were used to assess the model's predictive ability.

MEASUREMENTS

Temporal validation was performed in 1642 patients with a reintubation rate of 4.8%, with the model demonstrating strong discrimination (optimism-corrected c-statistic 0.77) and low predictive error (Brier score 0.044) but poor model precision and recall (Optimal F1 score 0.29). Combined domain and geographic validation were performed in 2041 patients with a reintubation rate of 1.5%. The model displayed solid discriminative ability (optimism-corrected c-statistic = 0.73) and low predictive error (Brier score = 0.0149) but low precision and recall (Optimal F1 score = 0.13). Geographic validation was performed in 2489 patients with a reintubation rate of 1.6%, with the model displaying good discrimination (optimism-corrected c-statistic = 0.71) and predictive error (Brier score = 0.0152) but poor precision and recall (Optimal F1 score = 0.13).

MAIN RESULTS

The reintubation model displayed strong discriminative ability and low predictive error within each validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Future work is needed to explore how to optimize models before local implementation.

A Retrospective Pilot Comparison Trial Investigating Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Surgical Patients Who Received Sugammadex Reversal During 2018 to 2021

OBJECTIVES

To compare the number of eligible urgent and elective cardiac surgical patients who could be extubated successfully within 6 hours of surgery and who received sugammadex versus those who did not.

DESIGN

This retrospective pilot study compared outcomes in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass between 2018 to 2021 who received sugammadex versus those who did not.

SETTING

At a tertiary-care hospital in the Northshore of Chicago.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 358 elective or urgent cardiac surgical patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (by 1 cardiac surgeon) and were extubated within 24 hours of the end of surgery at Evanston Hospital in Evanston, IL, were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Data were examined in the following 2 groups of patients: those who were administered sugammadex and those who were not.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After performing propensity matching for age, sex, body mass index, kidney or liver disease, the number of preoperative conditions (defined as the sum of the presence of the following medical conditions: diabetes, immunosuppressive disease, on home oxygen, on inhaled bronchodilator, or sleep apnea), number of patients who underwent elective or urgent surgery in each group, surgery time, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, number of intraoperative blood products, use of intraoperative midazolam and propofol, a statistically significant increase in the percentage of patients in the sugammadex group were extubated within 6 hours of the end of surgery versus those who did not receive sugammadex (96.67% v 81.33%, p = 0.0428). In addition, there was a statistically significant reduction in time to extubation (hours) (4.72 ± 2.92) v (3.57± 1.96 p = 0.0098) in the sugammadex group. All other outcomes did not meet statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggested that using sugammadex reversal in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass may result in more patients meeting the Society of Thoracic Surgery benchmark extubation criteria within 6 hours of the end of surgery.

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial: reducing reintubation among high-risk cardiac surgery patients with high-flow nasal cannula (I-CAN)

INTRODUCTION

Heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy has been used as a therapy for hypoxic respiratory failure in numerous clinical settings. To date, limited data exist to guide appropriate use following cardiac surgery, particularly among patients at risk for experiencing reintubation. We hypothesised that postextubation treatment with high-flow nasal cannula would decrease the all-cause reintubation rate within the 48 hours following initial extubation, compared with usual care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery (open surgery on the heart or thoracic aorta) will be automatically enrolled, randomised and allocated to one of two treatment arms in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial at the time of initial extubation. The two treatment arms are administration of heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen postextubation and usual care (treatment at the discretion of the treating provider). The primary outcome will be all-cause reintubation within 48 hours of initial extubation. Secondary outcomes include all-cause 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay and ventilator-free days. Interaction analyses will be conducted to assess the differential impact of the intervention within strata of predicted risk of reintubation, calculated according to our previously published and validated prognostic model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Vanderbilt University Medical Center IRB approval, 15 March 2021 with waiver of written informed consent. Plan for publication of study protocol prior to study completion, as well as publication of results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04782817 submitted 25 February 2021.

DATE OF PROTOCOL

29 August 2022. Version 2.0.

Analgesic efficacy and risk of low-to-medium dose intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: An updated meta-analysis

Background

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and risk of low-to-medium dose intrathecal morphine (ITM) (i.e., ≤0.5 mg) following cardiac surgery.

Methods

Medline, Cochrane Library, Google scholar and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to February 2022. The primary outcome was pain intensity at postoperative 24 h, while the secondary outcomes included intravenous morphine consumption (IMC), extubation time, hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and ITM-associated side effects (e.g., respiratory depression). Subgroup analysis was performed on ITM dosage (low: <0.3 mg vs. medium: 0.3–0.5 mg).

Results

Fifteen RCTs involving 683 patients published from 1988 to 2021 were included. Pooled results showed significantly lower postoperative 24-h pain scores [mean difference (MD) = −1.61, 95% confidence interval: −1.98 to −1.24, p < 0.00001; trial sequential analysis: sufficient evidence; certainty of evidence: moderate] in the ITM group compared to the controls. Similar positive findings were noted at 12 (MD = −2.1) and 48 h (MD = −1.88). Use of ITM was also associated with lower IMC at 24 and 48 h (MD: −13.69 and −14.57 mg, respectively; all p < 0.05) and early tracheal extubation (i.e., 48.08 min). No difference was noted in hospital/ICU LOS, and nausea/vomiting in both groups, but patients receiving ITM had higher risk of pruritus (relative risk = 2.88, p = 0.008). There was no subgroup difference in IMC except a lower pain score with 0.3–0.5 mg than <0.3 mg at postoperative 24 h. Respiratory depression events were not noted in the ITM group.

Conclusion

Our results validated the analgesic efficacy of low-to-medium dose ITM for patients receiving cardiac surgery without increasing the risk of respiratory depression.

A 3-hour fast-track extubation protocol for early extubation after cardiac surgery

Objectives

Early extubation after cardiac surgery improves outcomes and reduces cost. We investigated the effect of a multidisciplinary 3-hour fast-track protocol on extubation, intensive care unit length of stay time, and reintubation rate after a wide range of cardiac surgical procedures.

Methods

We performed an observational study of 472 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a large academic institution. A multidisciplinary 3-hour fast-track protocol was applied to a wide range of cardiac procedures. Data were collected 4 months before and 6 months after protocol implementation. Cox regression model assessed factors associated with extubation time and intensive care unit length of stay.

Results

A total of 217 patients preprotocol implementation and 255 patients postprotocol implementation were included. Baseline characteristics were similar except for the median procedure time and dexmedetomidine use. The median extubation time was reduced by 44% (4:43 hours vs 3:08 hours; P < .001) in the postprotocol group. Extubation within 3 hours was achieved in 49.4% of patients in the postprotocol group compared with 25.8% patients in the preprotocol group; P < .001. There was no statistically significant difference in the intensive care unit length of stay after controlling for other factors. Early extubation was associated with only 1 patient requiring reintubation in the postprotocol group.

Conclusions

The multidisciplinary 3-hour fast-track extubation protocol is a safe and effective tool to further reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation after a wide range of cardiac surgical procedures. The protocol implementation did not decrease the intensive care unit length of stay.

A Predictive Model of Reintubation after Cardiac Surgery Using the Electronic Health Record

BACKGROUND

Reintubation and prolonged intubation after cardiac surgery are associated with significant complications. Despite these competing risks, providers frequently extubate patients with limited insight into the risk of reintubation at the time of extubation. Achieving timely, successful extubation remains a significant clinical challenge.

METHODS

Based on an analysis of 2835 patients undergoing cardiac surgery at our institution between November 2017 and July 2020, we developed a model for an individual's risk of reintubation at the time of extubation. Predictors were screened for inclusion in the model based on clinical plausibility and availability at the time of extubation. Rigorous data reduction methods were used to create a model that could be easily integrated into clinical workflow at the time of extubation.

RESULTS

In total, 90 patients (3.2%) were reintubated within 48 hours of initial extubation. Number of inotropes [1 (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 15.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.5-47.6; p <.001), ≥2 (OR, 62.7; 95% CI 14.3-279.5; p<.001)]; dexmedetomidine dose (OR, 3.0 [per mcg/kg/h]; 95% CI 1.9-4.7; p <.001), time to extubation (OR, 1.04 [per six hour increase]; 95% CI 1.02-1.05; p <.001), and respiratory rate (OR, 1.04 [per breath/min.]; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; p <.001) were the best predictors for the model, which displayed excellent discriminative capacity (the area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.86; 95% CI 0.84-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

An improved understanding of reintubation risk may lead to improved decision-making at extubation and targeted interventions to decrease reintubation in high-risk patients. Future studies are needed to optimize timing of extubation.

Balancing intubation time with postoperative risk in cardiac surgery patients - a retrospective cohort analysis

Introduction

Intubation time in patients undergoing cardiac surgery may be associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Premature extubation can have serious adverse physiological consequences. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of intubation time on morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of data on 1,904 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and stratified them by duration of intubation time after surgery - 0-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-24 and over 24 hours. Postoperative complications risk analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression analysis for patients extubated ≤12 and >12 hours.

Results

Intubation percentages in each time cohort were as follows: 0-6 hours - 7.8%, 6-9 hours - 17.3%, 9-12 hours - 26.8%, 12-24 hours - 44.4% and >24 hours - 3.7%. Patients extubated ≤12 hours after CABG were younger, mostly males, more often smokers, with lower preoperative risk. They had lower 30-day mortality (2.02% vs 4.59%, P=0.002), shorter hospital stay (7.68±4.49 vs 9.65±12.63 days, P<0.001) and shorter intensive care unit stay (2.39 vs 3.30 days, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that intubation exceeding 12 hours after CABG increases the risk of postoperative delirium (OR 1.548, 95% CI 1.161-2.064, P=0.003) and risk of postoperative hemofiltration (OR 1.302, 95% CI 1.023-1.657, P=0.032).

Conclusion

Results indicate that risk of postoperative complications does not increase until intubation time exceeds 12 hours. Shorter intubation time is seen in younger, men and smokers. Intubation time >12 hours is a risk factor for postoperative delirium and hemofiltration after cardiac surgery.

Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery

Quality of care is of increasing importance in health and surgical care. In order to maintain and improve quality, we must be able to measure it and identify variation. In this narrative review, we aim to identify measures used in the assessment of quality of care in cardiac surgery and to evaluate their utility. The electronic databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL were searched for original published studies using the terms 'cardiac surgery' and 'quality or outcome or process or structure' as either keywords in the title or text or MeSH terms. Secondary searches and identification of references from original articles were carried out. We found a total of 54 original articles evaluating measurements of quality. While structure, process, and outcome indicators remain the mainstay of quality measurement, new and innovative methods of risk assessment have improved reliability and discrimination. Continuous assessment provides a promising method of both maintaining and improving quality of care. Future studies should focus on long-term and patient-centred outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.

Pulmonary Perfusion and Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Not Associated with Improved Postoperative Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Clinical trials of either pulmonary perfusion or ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) are equivocal. We hypothesized that to achieve significant improvement in outcomes both interventions had to be concurrent.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTINGS

Major academic tertiary referral medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred seventy-four consecutive patients who underwent open heart surgery with CBP 2009-2013.

INTERVENTIONS

The outcomes of 86 patients who received pulmonary perfusion and ventilation during CBP were retrospectively compared to the control group of 188 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Respiratory complications rates were similar in both groups (33.7 vs. 33.5%), as were the rates of postoperative pneumonia (4.7 vs. 4.3%), pleural effusions (13.9 vs. 12.2%), and re-intubations (9.3 vs. 9.1%). Rates of adverse postoperative cardiac events including ventricular tachycardia (9.3 vs. 8.5%) and atrial fibrillation (33.7 vs. 28.2%) were equivalent in both groups. Incidence of sepsis (8.1 vs. 5.3%), postoperative stroke (2.3 vs. 2.1%), acute kidney injury (2.3 vs. 3.7%), and renal failure (5.8 vs. 3.7%) was likewise comparable. Despite similar transfusion requirements, coagulopathy (12.8 vs. 5.3%, p = 0.031) and the need for mediastinal re-exploration (17.4 vs. 9.6%, p = 0.0633) were observed more frequently in the pulmonary perfusion and ventilation group, but the difference did not reach the statistical significance. Intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, and the ICU readmission rates (7.0 vs. 8.0%) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous pulmonary perfusion and ventilation during CBP were not associated with improved clinical outcomes.