1
|
Dellon EP, Allada G, Allgood SJ, Georgiopoulos AM, Goggin JL, Hadjiliadis D, Lowman JD, Madge S, Middour-Oxler B, Muirhead C, Noel M, Wilson P, Se H, Faro A, Kavalieratos D. Addressing pain in people living with cystic fibrosis: Cystic fibrosis foundation evidence-informed guidelines. J Cyst Fibros 2024:S1569-1993(24)01847-2. [PMID: 39645476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 11/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
Even as many outcomes for people living with cystic fibrosis (PLwCF) improve, individuals still experience extensive symptom burdens. From birth, many PLwCF experience both pain as a symptom of their CF disease and procedural pain, posing detriments to health, functioning, and quality of life. Despite its prevalence and impact, there is no CF-specific guidance for the assessment and management of pain. Similarly, no guidance exists regarding communication with PLwCF about their pain experiences or its impact on their lives. Therefore, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) assembled an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, PLwCF, and caregivers to develop consensus recommendations for pain management in CF. We utilized literature review and expert opinion to develop 13 recommendations addressing pain assessment, management, and communication. Recommendations are centered on guiding principles of utilizing a multimodal approach to pain management, offering age and developmentally appropriate assessment and interventions, concurrently treating underlying conditions causing, contributing to, and/or exacerbated by pain, considering societal stigma of the pain experience, particularly for minoritized and marginalized people, and sensitivity to issues of access and cost. These recommendations are intended to guide clinicians in managing pain and improving quality of life for PLwCF with pain at all stages of illness and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P Dellon
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - G Allada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - S J Allgood
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - A M Georgiopoulos
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J L Goggin
- Pulmonary Service Line, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - D Hadjiliadis
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J D Lowman
- Department of Physical Therapy and Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - S Madge
- Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Middour-Oxler
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University Cystic Fibrosis Care Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - C Muirhead
- Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - M Noel
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - P Wilson
- Pharmacy Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - A Faro
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - D Kavalieratos
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lobo C, Tufegdzic B. Postoperative pain management after thoracic transplantations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37:493-503. [PMID: 39087400 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Heart and lung transplantation evolution marked significant milestones. Pioneering efforts of Dr Christiaan Barnard with the first successful heart transplant in 1967, followed by advancements in heart-lung and single-lung transplants by Drs Bruce Reitz, Norman Shumway, and Joel Cooper laid the groundwork for contemporary organ transplantation, offering hope for patients with end-stage heart and pulmonary diseases. RECENT FINDINGS Pretransplant opioid use in heart transplant recipients is linked to higher mortality and opioid dependence posttransplant. Effective pain control is crucial to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. However, research on specific pain management protocols for heart transplant recipients is limited. In lung transplantation effective pain management is crucial. Studies emphasize the benefits of multimodal strategies, including thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks, to enhance recovery and reduce opioid use. Perioperative pain control challenges in lung transplantation are unique and necessitate careful consideration to prevent complications and improve outcomes. SUMMARY This review emphasizes the importance of tailored pain management in heart and lung transplant recipients. It advocates for extended follow-up and alternative analgesics to minimize opioid dependency and enhance quality of life. Further high-quality research is needed to optimize postoperative analgesia and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis
- Pain, Postoperative/etiology
- Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
- Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
- Pain, Postoperative/therapy
- Pain Management/methods
- Lung Transplantation/adverse effects
- Heart Transplantation/adverse effects
- Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
- Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects
- Analgesia, Epidural/methods
- Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control
- Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology
- Nerve Block/methods
- Nerve Block/adverse effects
- Quality of Life
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Lobo
- Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luo G, Ni T, Tao X, Xiao J, Yao Y, Huang M, Chen J, Yan M. Continuous serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia following lung transplantation via anterolateral incision: a pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1438580. [PMID: 39359919 PMCID: PMC11445064 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Unilateral or bilateral anterolateral thoracotomy May lead to severe acute pain in lung transplantation (LTx). Although serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is apparently effective for pain control after open thoracic surgery, there remains a lack of evidence for the application of SAPB for postoperative analgesia after LTx. Objective In this case series pilot study, we describe the feasibility of continuous SAPB after lung transplantation and provide a preliminary investigation of its safety and efficacy. Methods After chest incisions closure was complete, all patients underwent ultrasound-guided SAPB with catheter insertion. Numerical rating scale (NRS), additional opioid consumption, time to endotracheal tube removal, ICU length of stay, and catheter-related adverse events were followed up and recorded for each patient within 1 week after the procedure. Results A total of 14 patients who received LTx at this center from August 2023 to November 2023 were included. All patients received anterolateral approaches, and 10 (71.4%) of them underwent bilateral LTx. The duration of catheter placement was 2 (2-3) days, and the Resting NRS during catheter placement was equal to or less than 4. A total of 11 patients (78.6%) were supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in LTx, whereas 8 patients (57.1%) removed the tracheal tube on the first day after LTx. Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 5 (3-6) days, with tracheal intubation retained for 1 (1-2) days, and only one patient was reintubated. The morphine equivalent dose (MED) in the first week after LTx was 11.95 mg, and no catheter-related adverse events were detected. Limitations We did not assess the sensory loss plane due to the retrospective design. In addition, differences in catheter placement time May lead to bias in pain assessment. Conclusion Although continuous SAPB May be a safe and effective fascial block technique for relieving acute pain after LTx, it should be confirmed by high-quality clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingting Ni
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinchen Tao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jie Xiao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuanyuan Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Man Huang
- Department of General Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jingyu Chen
- Department of Lung Transplantation, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jackson CB, Desai J, Lee WA, Renfro LA. Utility of Continuous Paravertebral Block After Retroperitoneal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 104:124-131. [PMID: 37454895 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs can be associated with significant pain and morbidity. Previous studies have demonstrated utility of adjunctive epidural analgesia (EA) in addition to general anesthesia (GA) to reduce pain and blunt the maladaptive surgical stress response. However, EA may be complicated by epidural hematomas and severe hypotension. Recently, we started using continuous paravertebral block (PVB) for perioperative analgesia after retroperitoneal AAA repair. PVB has some distinct advantages over EA such as unilateral localization, reduced risk of hypotension, and minimal risk of epidural hematoma in the setting of systemic heparinization. This study aimed to examine the utility of PVB by comparing total opioid consumption in the postoperative period among patients who received GA + PVB and those who received GA alone. METHODS This retrospective matched cohort study included 62 patients who underwent elective retroperitoneal AAA repair between January 2019 and August 2022. Thirty-one subjects managed with GA + PVB were compared with 31 control subjects treated with GA alone, matched on following criteria: age, sex, and cross-clamp location. Outcome measures included total opioid analgesics administered during their inhospital postoperative course, time to extubation, time to return to baseline activity, time to normal bowel function, and length of stay. Opioid doses were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). RESULTS The GA + PVB group required significantly less opioid analgesics (81 ± 53 MME) than the GA group (171 ± 121 MME) (P < 0.001). Compared to GA alone, GA + PVB was superior in every clinical metric examined: time to extubation (3 vs. 1 hr, P < 0.001), recovery of bowel function (3 vs. 2 days, P = 0.002), recovery of baseline physical activity (4 vs. 2 days, P = 0.019), and length of stay (5 vs. 3 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Continuous paravertebral block provides better pain management with significantly decreased opioid requirements in the postoperative period compared to GA-alone for patients undergoing elective retroperitoneal AAA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody B Jackson
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jamshed Desai
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL
| | - W Anthony Lee
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Baptist Health Medical Group-Vascular Surgery, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL
| | - Leslie A Renfro
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Department of Anesthesiology, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bungart B, Joudeh L, Fettiplace M. Local anesthetic dosing and toxicity of adult truncal catheters: a narrative review of published practice. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:209-222. [PMID: 37451826 PMCID: PMC10787820 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE Anesthesiologists frequently use truncal catheters for postoperative pain control but with limited characterization of dosing and toxicity. OBJECTIVE We reviewed the published literature to characterize local anesthetic dosing and toxicity of paravertebral and transversus abdominis plane catheters in adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW We searched the literature for bupivacaine or ropivacaine infusions in the paravertebral or transversus abdominis space in humans dosed for 24 hours. We evaluated bolus dosing, infusion dosing and cumulative 24-hour dosing in adults. We also identified cases of local anesthetic systemic toxicity and toxic blood levels. FINDINGS Following screening, we extracted data from 121 and 108 papers for ropivacaine and bupivacaine respectively with a total of 6802 patients. For ropivacaine and bupivacaine, respectively, bolus dose was 1.4 mg/kg (95% CI 0.4 to 3.0, n=2978) and 1.0 mg/kg (95% CI 0.18 to 2.1, n=2724); infusion dose was 0.26 mg/kg/hour (95% CI 0.06 to 0.63, n=3579) and 0.2 mg/kg/hour (95% CI 0.06 to 0.5, n=3199); 24-hour dose was 7.75 mg/kg (95% CI 2.1 to 15.7, n=3579) and 6.0 mg/kg (95% CI 2.1 to 13.6, n=3223). Twenty-four hour doses exceeded the package insert recommended upper limit in 28% (range: 17%-40% based on maximum and minimum patient weights) of ropivacaine infusions and 51% (range: 45%-71%) of bupivacaine infusions. Toxicity occurred in 30 patients and was associated with high 24-hour dose, bilateral catheters, cardiac surgery, cytochrome P-450 inhibitors and hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSION Practitioners frequently administer ropivacaine and bupivacaine above the package insert limits, at doses associated with toxicity. Patient safety would benefit from more specific recommendations to limit excessive dose and risk of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittani Bungart
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lana Joudeh
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Fettiplace
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Azem K, Mangoubi E, Zribi B, Fein S. Regional analgesia for lung transplantation: A narrative review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:643-651. [PMID: 37232676 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment for end-stage pulmonary disease. About 4500 LTxs are performed annually worldwide. It is considered challenging and complex surgery regarding anaesthesia and pain management. While providing adequate analgesia is crucial for patient comfort, early mobilisation and prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications, standardising an analgesic protocol is challenging due to the diversity of aetiologies, surgical approaches and the potential use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Although thoracic epidural analgesia is commonly considered the gold standard, concerns regarding procedural safety and its potential for devastating consequences have led physicians to seek safer analgesic modalities such as thoracic nerve blocks. The advantages of thoracic nerve blocks for general thoracic surgery are well established. However, their utility in LTx remains unclear. Considering paucity of relevant literature, this review aims to raise awareness about the literature gap in the field and highlight the need for further high-quality studies determining the effectiveness of available techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karam Azem
- From the Department of Anaesthesia, Rabin Medical Centre, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva (KA, EM. BZ, SF) and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (KA, EM. BZ, SF)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ander M, Mugve N, Crouch C, Kassel C, Fukazawa K, Izaak R, Deshpande R, McLendon C, Huang J. Regional anesthesia for transplantation surgery - A white paper part 1: Thoracic transplantation surgery. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15043. [PMID: 37306898 PMCID: PMC10834230 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Transplantation surgery continues to evolve and improve through advancements in transplant technique and technology. With the increased availability of ultrasound machines as well as the continued development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, regional anesthesia has become an essential component of providing analgesia and minimizing opioid use perioperatively. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures. To date, no formal guidelines or recommendations exist which address the use of regional anesthesia in transplantation surgery. In response, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) identified experts in both transplantation surgery and regional anesthesia to review available literature concerning these topics. The goal of this task force was to provide an overview of these publications to help guide transplantation anesthesiologists in utilizing regional anesthesia. The literature search encompassed most transplantation surgeries currently performed and the multitude of associated regional anesthetic techniques. Outcomes analyzed included analgesic effectiveness of the blocks, reduction in other analgesic modalities-particularly opioid use, improvement in patient hemodynamics, as well as associated complications. The findings summarized in this systemic review support the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control after transplantation surgeries. Part 1 of the manuscript focuses on regional anesthesia performed in thoracic transplantation surgeries, and part 2 in abdominal transplantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ander
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Neal Mugve
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Cara Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Cale Kassel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nebraska Medical Center, 984455 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Kyota Fukazawa
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert Izaak
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC Hospitals, N2198 UNC Hospitals, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ranjit Deshpande
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University/Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Charles McLendon
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Jiapeng Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tasargol O, Darbaz I, Ergene O, Zabitler F, Deniz A, Kose SG, Kose HC, Tulgar S. Evaluation of the effects of bupivacaine combined with sugammadex on the duration of the nociceptive blockade in sciatic nerve blocks: a controlled, double-blind animal study. Korean J Anesthesiol 2023; 76:152-159. [PMID: 36377331 PMCID: PMC10078992 DOI: 10.4097/kja.22486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Animal and other experimental studies have demonstrated increased block time and quality when α- and β-cyclodextrin drugs are combined with local anesthetics. However, to our knowledge, no study has utilized γ-cyclodextrins in such a combination. In the present study, we used an animal model to evaluate the effects of different doses of the combined administration of γ-cyclodextrin (sugammadex) and bupivacaine on the duration of sciatic nerve blocks in rats. METHODS Sciatic nerve blocks were performed with a 0.20 ml mixture in all groups. For the non-experimental groups, this mixture consisted of 0.2 ml saline (Sham group), 0.2 ml sugammadex (Group S), or 0.16 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.04 ml saline (Group B). For the experimental groups, 0.16 ml bupivacaine 0.5% was administered along with 0.01 ml sugammadex and 0.03 ml saline (Group BS1), 0.02 ml sugammadex and 0.02 ml saline (Group BS2), or 0.04 ml sugammadex (Group BS4). Proprioception, nociception, and motor function were evaluated until the sciatic block was completely reversed. RESULTS Motor, proprioceptive, and nociceptive blockades occurred within 5 min in all experimental groups. In Group BS4, the duration of the motor, proprioceptive, and nociceptive blockades was significantly increased compared with the other experimental groups. However, in Groups BS1 and BS2, only the duration of the nociceptive blockade was significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS The combined administration of sugammadex and bupivacaine for sciatic nerve blocks in rats led to a significant increase in the duration of motor, proprioceptive, and nociceptive blockades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Tasargol
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Doctor Burhan Nalbantoglu State Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Isfendiyar Darbaz
- Near East University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Osman Ergene
- Near East University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Feride Zabitler
- Near East University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Aziz Deniz
- TRNC Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Guzelyurt Veterinary Department, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Selin Guven Kose
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Halil Cihan Kose
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serkan Tulgar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Natalini JG, Clausen ES. Critical Care Management of the Lung Transplant Recipient. Clin Chest Med 2023; 44:105-119. [PMID: 36774158 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplantation is often the only treatment option for patients with severe irreversible lung disease. Improvements in donor and recipient selection, organ allocation, surgical techniques, and immunosuppression have all contributed to better survival outcomes after lung transplantation. Nonetheless, lung transplant recipients still experience frequent complications, often necessitating treatment in an intensive care setting. In addition, the use of extracorporeal life support as a means of bridging critically ill patients to lung transplantation has become more widespread. This review focuses on the critical care aspects of lung transplantation, both before and after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake G Natalini
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 530 First Avenue, HCC 4A, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Emily S Clausen
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 9036 Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fessler J, Finet M, Fischler M, Le Guen M. New Aspects of Lung Transplantation: A Narrative Overview Covering Important Aspects of Perioperative Management. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 13:life13010092. [PMID: 36676041 PMCID: PMC9865529 DOI: 10.3390/life13010092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The management of lung transplant patients has continued to evolve in recent years. The year 2021 was marked by the publication of the International Consensus Recommendations for Anesthetic and Intensive Care Management of Lung Transplantation. There have been major changes in lung transplant programs over the last few years. This review will summarize the knowledge in anesthesia management of lung transplantation with the most recent data. It will highlight the following aspects which concern anesthesiologists more specifically: (1) impact of COVID-19, (2) future of transplantation for cystic fibrosis patients, (3) hemostasis management, (4) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management, (5) early prediction of primary graft dysfunction, and (6) pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Fessler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Hospital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Michaël Finet
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Hospital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Marc Fischler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Hospital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Morgan Le Guen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Hospital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France
- University Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78000 Versailles, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu J, Chung P, Wu EH, Zhang K, Komatsu R. Case Report: Radiographic Identification of Intrapleural Misplacement of Epidural Catheter in an Intubated Post-Lung Transplant Patient. Int Med Case Rep J 2021; 14:823-828. [PMID: 34887686 PMCID: PMC8651211 DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s338755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrapleural misplacement of epidural catheter is a rare complication of thoracic epidural placement, which can be difficult to detect in intubated patients with unreliable pain reports and hemodynamic response to the test dose. We describe a case of intrapleural misplacement of thoracic epidural in a 50-year-old man status-post bilateral lung transplant and highlight the use of radiographic techniques to identify the misplacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Philip Chung
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - En-Haw Wu
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryu Komatsu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fritz AV, Martin AK, Ramakrishna H. Practical considerations for developing a lung transplantation anesthesiology program. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 37:445-453. [PMID: 34493911 PMCID: PMC8412970 DOI: 10.1007/s12055-021-01217-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The advancement in lung transplantation outcomes has been secondary to ongoing improvements within multiple medical specialties. The recent emergence of literature describing the impact of anesthetic management on perioperative outcomes has led to the beginnings of formalized training fellowships within lung transplantation anesthesiology. Practical considerations for the development of a lung transplantation anesthesiology program, both clinical and educational, are herein described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Virginia Fritz
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Archer Kilbourne Martin
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
| | - Harish Ramakrishna
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martin AK, Yalamuri SM, Wilkey BJ, Kolarczyk L, Fritz AV, Jayaraman A, Ramakrishna H. The Impact of Anesthetic Management on Perioperative Outcomes in Lung Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:1669-1680. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
14
|
Klinger RY, Cunniff C, Mamoun N, Cooter M, Hashmi N, Hopkins T, Smith P, Hartwig M, Bottiger B. Patient-Reported Chronic Pain Outcomes After Lung Transplantation. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 24:96-103. [DOI: 10.1177/1089253219882432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pain after lung transplantation is a significant concern, in particular given the heterogeneity of the patient population and the challenges of achieving adequate pain control amid concerns related to complex immunosuppressant regimens and the possibility of respiratory depression. We undertook a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) survey administered via our electronic health care portal to examine the postoperative incisional pain prevalence in a cohort of lung transplant recipients at a single, high-volume center where bilateral thoracosternotomy is the preferred surgical approach. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health and Pain Intensity short forms were sent to a total of 173 lung transplant recipients who were more than 2 months postsurgery at the time of the study. A total of 64 patients responded to both PROMIS surveys (response rate 38%). In the cohort of survey respondents, we observed a chronic pain incidence of 58% after lung transplantation (median pain score 1/10) and an overall good quality of life score (median score 4/5); however, only 9.4% reported moderate-severe pain (pain score ≥5/10). Survey nonrespondents had higher rates of pretransplant opioid and psychiatric medication use compared with respondents. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility of using an electronic PRO survey for assessing postoperative pain outcomes after lung transplantation. However, measuring pain outcomes using this type of tool highlights issues of response rate and potential selection bias. Larger studies are needed to adequately assess the risk and predictors of chronic pain after lung transplantation and its impact on quality of life.
Collapse
|
15
|
McLean SR, von Homeyer P, Cheng A, Hall ML, Mulligan MS, Cain K, Togashi K. Assessing the Benefits of Preoperative Thoracic Epidural Placement for Lung Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2654-2661. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
16
|
Gelzinis TA. An Update on Postoperative Analgesia Following Lung Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2662-2664. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
17
|
Lenihan M, Mullane D, Buggy D, Flood G, Griffin M. Anesthesia for Lung Transplantation in Cystic Fibrosis: Retrospective Review from the Irish National Transplantation Centre. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2372-2380. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
18
|
Hatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Turktan M, Izol V, Arıdogan A, Gunes Y, Ozcengiz D. Comparative study of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain control in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18:24. [PMID: 29454333 PMCID: PMC5816552 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0479-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for renal calculi, and nephrostomy tubes lead to postoperative pain after PCNL. Regional techniques (e.g., epidural analgesia and peripheral blocks) and opioids are applied for postoperative pain treatment. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block (PVB) and tramadol on postoperative pain in patients who underwent PCNL. METHOD Fifty-three patients were included in this prospective randomized study. The patients were allocated into two groups: the PVB group (group P, n = 26) and the tramadol group (group T, n = 27). All patients were administered standard general anaesthesia. Ultrasound-guided PVB was performed at the T11- L1 levels using 0.5% bupivacaine for a total dose of 15 mL in group P. Patients in group T were intravenously administered a loading dose of 1 mg/kg tramadol. Patients in both groups were given patient-controlled analgesia. Haemodynamic parameters, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, side effects, and complications, tramadol consumption and additional analgesic requirements of the patients were recorded after surgery. RESULTS Haemodynamic parameters were statistically similar between the groups. The VAS in group P were statistically lower than in group T. In the 24-h period after surgery, total PCA tramadol consumption was statistically lower in group P than in group T. The use of supplemental analgesic in group T was higher than in group P. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-guided PVB was found to be an effective analgesia compared to tramadol, and no additional complications were encountered. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02412930 , date of registration: March 27, 2015, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehra Hatipoglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cukurova University, 01250, Adana, Turkey.
| | - Ersel Gulec
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cukurova University, 01250, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mediha Turktan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cukurova University, 01250, Adana, Turkey
| | - Volkan Izol
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Atilla Arıdogan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Gunes
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cukurova University, 01250, Adana, Turkey
| | - Dilek Ozcengiz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cukurova University, 01250, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Perioperative management of patients undergoing lung transplantation is challenging and requires constant communication among the surgical, anesthesia, perfusion, and nursing teams. Although all aspects of anesthetic management are important, certain intraoperative strategies (mechanical ventilation, fluid management, extracorporeal mechanical support deployment) have tremendous impact on the subsequent evolution of the lung transplant recipient, especially with respect to allograft function, and should be carefully considered. This review highlights some of the intraoperative anesthetic challenges and opportunities during lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Nicoara
- Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, HAFS Building, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - John Anderson-Dam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, 757 Westwood Boulevard, Suite 3325, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Subramaniam K, Nazarnia S. Noteworthy Literature Published in 2016 for Thoracic Organ Transplantation Anesthesiologists. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 21:45-57. [DOI: 10.1177/1089253216688537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
This article is first in the series to review the published literature on perioperative issues in patients undergoing thoracic solid organ transplantations. We present recent literature from 2016 on preoperative considerations, organ preservation, intraoperative anesthesia management, surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and the impact of perioperative management on short- and long-term outcomes that are pertinent to thoracic transplantation anesthesiologists.
Collapse
|