1
|
Kaur S, Henthorn P, Hendrickse A. Pain management for liver transplant recipients. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:397-403. [PMID: 37728190 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Liver transplant recipients pose several pain management challenges. Altered hepatic drug metabolism and clearance in end-stage liver disease patients complicates the use of certain medications, while existing coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia can limit the use of regional anesthetic techniques. Largely due to a high prevalence of substance use disorders, these patients have increased vulnerability to opioid misuse in the perioperative period, which can make acute postoperative pain difficult to control and potentiates prolonged and painful recovery, increasing the risk of developing chronic postsurgical pain. We present current evidence-based literature that reviews optimal pain management strategies for this challenging patient demographic. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have shown that thoracic epidurals provide superior pain control in open hepatic resections. Recent data suggests thoracic epidurals may be safely considered in select liver transplant recipients with normal preoperative coagulation status; however, this evidence is limited, and further studies are needed. When the risks of coagulopathy prohibit epidural placement, truncal blocks such as transversus abdominis plane blocks or quadratus lumborum blocks and abdominal wound catheters can serve as alternative regional modalities. Specialized teams should manage pain using a multimodal approach. SUMMARY Thoracic epidural analgesia may be an option for liver transplant recipients with normal coagulation profiles prior to surgery; however, additional studies are warranted. Other regional techniques are also available. Emphasis should be placed on optimizing multimodal pain medication management. Nonpharmacological interventions should also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simrat Kaur
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ander M, Mugve N, Crouch C, Kassel C, Fukazawa K, Izaak R, Deshpande R, McLendon C, Huang J. Regional anesthesia for transplantation surgery - A white paper part 1: Thoracic transplantation surgery. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15043. [PMID: 37306898 PMCID: PMC10834230 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Transplantation surgery continues to evolve and improve through advancements in transplant technique and technology. With the increased availability of ultrasound machines as well as the continued development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, regional anesthesia has become an essential component of providing analgesia and minimizing opioid use perioperatively. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures. To date, no formal guidelines or recommendations exist which address the use of regional anesthesia in transplantation surgery. In response, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) identified experts in both transplantation surgery and regional anesthesia to review available literature concerning these topics. The goal of this task force was to provide an overview of these publications to help guide transplantation anesthesiologists in utilizing regional anesthesia. The literature search encompassed most transplantation surgeries currently performed and the multitude of associated regional anesthetic techniques. Outcomes analyzed included analgesic effectiveness of the blocks, reduction in other analgesic modalities-particularly opioid use, improvement in patient hemodynamics, as well as associated complications. The findings summarized in this systemic review support the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control after transplantation surgeries. Part 1 of the manuscript focuses on regional anesthesia performed in thoracic transplantation surgeries, and part 2 in abdominal transplantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ander
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Neal Mugve
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Cara Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Cale Kassel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nebraska Medical Center, 984455 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Kyota Fukazawa
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert Izaak
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC Hospitals, N2198 UNC Hospitals, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ranjit Deshpande
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University/Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Charles McLendon
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Jiapeng Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong Y, Li Y, Ye M, Yan S, Yang W, Jiang C. Identifying an optimal machine learning model generated circulating biomarker to predict chronic postoperative pain in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Front Surg 2023; 9:1068321. [PMID: 36684250 PMCID: PMC9852489 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1068321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after hepatectomy is highly prevalent and challenging to treat. Several risk factors have been unmasked for CPSP after hepatectomy, such as acute postoperative pain. The current secondary analysis of a clinical study sought to extend previous research by investigating more clinical variables and inflammatory biomarkers as risk factors for CPSP after hepatectomy and sifting those strongly related to CPSP to build a reliable machine learning model to predict CPSP occurring. Participants included 91 adults undergoing hepatectomy who was followed 3 months postoperatively. Twenty-four hours after surgery, participants completed numerical rating scale (NRS) grading and blood sample collecting. Three months after surgery, participants also reported whether CPSP occurred through follow-up. The Random Forest and Support Vector Machine models were conducted to predict pain outcomes 3 months after surgery. The results showed that the SVM model had better performance in predicting CPSP which consists of acute postoperative pain (evaluated by NRS) and matrix metalloprotease 3 (MMP3) level. What's more, besides traditional cytokines, several novel inflammatory biomarkers like C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and MMP2 levels were found to be closely related to CPSP and a novel spectrum of inflammatory biomarkers was created. These findings demonstrate that the SVM model consisting of acute postoperative pain and MMP3 level predicts greater chronic pain intensity 3 months after hepatectomy and with this model, intervention administration before CPSP occurs may prevent or minimize CPSP intensity successfully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mao Ye
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Siyu Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chunling Jiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Correspondence: Chunling Jiang
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lindner BK, Lakhani SA, Cooper M, Nguyen BM, Vranic G, Yi SY, Abrams P. Evaluation of a multidisciplinary, multimodal pain management protocol following pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14856. [PMID: 36398867 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing solid-organ transplantation demonstrate pain arising from both the surgical intervention and pre-existing comorbidities. High levels of opioid use both pre- and post-transplant are associated with unfavorable transplant outcomes. Patient education, multimodal therapy, and discharge planning have all been demonstrated to reduce opioid use after transplant. METHODS This is a single-center, retrospective study analyzing patients before and after implementation of a multimodal, multidisciplinary pain management protocol. Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) use during the index transplant hospitalization and the need for opioids at discharge was compared between the pre- and post-protocol groups. RESULTS A total of 52 patients were included in the study, 31 in the pre and 21 in the post-protocol groups. Inpatient MME use was reduced from 135.5 to 67.5 MMEs after protocol implementation. Additionally, the number of patients discharged on opioids following transplant decreased from 90.3% to 47.6%. Pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and return of bowel function was not different between groups. CONCLUSION The implementation of a multimodal, multidisciplinary pain management protocol significantly decreased opioid use during the post-surgical hospitalization and in the 6 months following transplantation. A combination of non-opioid analgesics, patient education, and discharge planning can be beneficial elements in pancreas transplant pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K Lindner
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Washington DC, USA
| | - Shahzia A Lakhani
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Brian M Nguyen
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Gayle Vranic
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Soo Y Yi
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Peter Abrams
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson-Laghi KA, Woo SM, Zafar Z, Fernandez S, Desale S, Robertazzi SE, Smith CI, Thomas AM, Lalos AT, Georgia SJ, Jenkins ML, Faust TW, Fishbein TM, Satoskar RS, Rangnekar AS, Hsu CC. Alcohol-associated liver disease predicts increased post-liver transplant opioid use. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14811. [PMID: 36057863 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a rising indication for liver transplantation (LT). Prolonged opioid use after LT leads to increased graft loss and mortality. The aim is to determine if patients transplanted with a primary diagnosis of ALD had higher risk of post-LT opioid use (p-LTOU) compared to non-ALD patients. METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent LT between 2015 and 2018 at Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute. Patients with prolonged hospitalization post-LT (>90 days), death within 90 days post-LT, and re-transplants were excluded. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety seven patients were transplanted, among 29% for indications of ALD. ALD patients were younger (52 vs. 56 years), more likely to be male (76% vs. 61%), Caucasian (71% vs. 44%), have higher MELD (28.8±8.8 vs. 25±8.8), and psychiatric disease than non-ALD patients (P < .05). There was no difference in pre-LT use of opioids, tobacco, marijuana, or illicit drugs between ALD and non-ALD patients. Pre-LT opioid use (OR = 11.7, P < .001), ALD (OR = 2.5, P = .01), and MELD score (OR = .95, P = .02) independently predicted 90-day p-LTOU. CONCLUSIONS ALD, pre-LT opioid use, and MELD score independently predict p-LTOU. Special attention should be paid to identify post-LT prolonged opioid use in ALD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie M Woo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zaeema Zafar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Sameer Desale
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Suzanne E Robertazzi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Coleman I Smith
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Arul M Thomas
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alexander T Lalos
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sarah J Georgia
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michelle L Jenkins
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas W Faust
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas M Fishbein
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rohit S Satoskar
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amol S Rangnekar
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Christine C Hsu
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun LY, Gitman M, Malik A, Te Terry PL, Spiro M, Raptis DA, Ramsay M. Optimal management of perioperative analgesia regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation - A systematic review, meta-analysis and expert panel recommendations. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14640. [PMID: 35285074 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate pain control is essential for patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Multiple analgesic strategies have been implemented during the perioperative period. There is no consensus on the optimal perioperative analgesia management. OBJECTIVES To provide recommendations, on the optimal perioperative analgesia management for LT. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using GRADE. Studies describing outcomes, morbidity, mortality, pain scores, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay in patients that received different pain management techniques during and after LT were included (CRD42021243282). RESULTS One thousand nine hundred ten articles were screened, but only two randomized controlled trials, one prospective and six retrospective studies were included. The opioid-avoidance protocols included, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block, as well as other non-opioid analgesics, resulted in improved short-term outcomes. Mortality was reduced in this group versus control cohorts (OR = 0.51; CI 0.14, 1.83; P = 0.350), Time to extubation, and intensive care unit LOS were shorter; pain scores after surgery were lower in opioid-avoidance group (percentage decrease, 35%, 12%, and 55%, respectively). However, hospital LOS was longer (percentage increase 8%). CONCLUSIONS Opioid-avoidance analgesia management for LT results in improved short-term outcomes. (Quality of Evidence; Moderate to low | Grade of Recommendation; Weak). Medications such as acetaminophen(paracetamol), gabapentin, ketamine, tramadol and local anesthesia may be used instead of, or as adjuncts to opioids for postoperative analgesia. Overall evidence remains weak and more robust studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ying Sun
- Liver Transplantation Center & Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Marina Gitman
- Department of Anesthesia Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ashish Malik
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael Ramsay
- Department of Anesthesia Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sakai T, Ko JS, Crouch CE, Kumar S, Little MB, Chae MS, Ganoza A, Gómez-Salinas L, Humar A, Kim SH, Koo BN, Rodriguez G, Sirianni J, Smith NK, Song JG, Ullah A, Hendrickse A. Perioperative management of adult living donor liver transplantation: Part 1 - recipients. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14667. [PMID: 35435293 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation option has become an established and widely practiced transplantation method for adult patients suffering from end-stage liver disease. It has successfully addressed the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplant Anesthesia jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of live donor liver transplant recipients. The review aims to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live liver transplantation recipients. We feature the status, outcomes, surgical procedure, portal venous decompression, anesthetic management, prevention of acute kidney injury, avoidance of blood transfusion, monitoring and therapeutic strategies of hemodynamic derangements, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for liver transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cara E Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael B Little
- Department of Anesthesiology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Luis Gómez-Salinas
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Abhi Humar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sang Hyun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Bon-Nyeo Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gonzalo Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Joel Sirianni
- Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Natalie K Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jun-Gol Song
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Aisha Ullah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adrian Hendrickse
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ge X, Pan Y, Jin D, Wang Y, Ge S. Effect of perioperative use of parecoxib on chronic post-surgical pain in elderly patients after hepatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2021; 22:35. [PMID: 34130753 PMCID: PMC8207796 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-021-00501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) has a negative impact on the recovery, quality of life, and physical functioning of elderly patients. This study aimed to test the superiority of parecoxib vs. placebo in preventing chronic post-hepatectomy pain in elderly patients under combined general-epidural anesthesia. Methods A total of 105 elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy under combined general-epidural anesthesia were randomized into the parecoxib or placebo group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with CPSP 3 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire score in CPSP-positive responders, acute pain intensity, postoperative analgesic demand, inflammatory markers change, and postoperative complications within 28 days. Results The parecoxib group provided a non-significant absolute 9.1% reduction in the rate of CPSP compared to the placebo group (P = 0.34). The average chronic pain visual analog scale in the parecoxib group was lower than that in the placebo group (P = 0.04). Significantly less moderate-to-severe acute pain at rest (P = 0.04) and with coughing (P < 0.001), less patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) consumption (P = 0.01), and less rescue analgesia (P < 0.001) were observed in the parecoxib group compared to the placebo group. Furthermore, no between-group difference was observed in inflammatory markers (P > 0.05) and postoperative complications (P = 0.65). Conclusions Parecoxib reduced the prevalence of CPSP in elderly patients after hepatectomy under combined general-epidural anesthesia from 44.4 to 35.3% with no statistical significance. Moreover, significantly alleviated CPSP intensity and improved acute pain management were observed. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=56961&htm=4) on August 3, 2020 (ChiCTR-2,000,035,198). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40360-021-00501-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Ge
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yan Pan
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Danfeng Jin
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shengjin Ge
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wilke TJ, Fremming BA, Brown BA, Markin NW, Kassel CA. 2020 Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:1449-1457. [PMID: 33653578 PMCID: PMC7865096 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The gold standard treatment of end-stage liver disease continues to be liver transplantation (LT). The challenges of LT require skilled anesthesiologists to anticipate physiologic changes associated with end-stage liver disease and surgical considerations that affect multiple organ systems. While on the waiting list, patients may be placed on new anticoagulation medications that can confound already complex coagulopathy in LT patients. Pain management often is an afterthought for such a complex procedure, but appropriate medications can help control pain while limiting opioid medications. Surgical stress and medications for immunosuppression can affect perioperative glucose management in ways that have implications for patient and graft survival. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in 2020 provided a new challenge for anesthesiologists. The uncertainty of the novel respiratory virus challenged providers beyond just LT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor J Wilke
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Bradley A Fremming
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Brittany A Brown
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Nicholas W Markin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Cale A Kassel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Liver Transplantation: A 10-year Study on 685 Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e648. [PMID: 33437863 PMCID: PMC7793348 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is not widely used for postoperative pain management in liver transplantation due to hepatic coagulopathy-related increased risk of inducing an epidural hematoma. However, an increasing number of patients are transplanted for other indications than the end-stage liver disease and without coagulopathy allowing insertion of an epidural catheter.
Collapse
|
11
|
Demir B, Saritas S. Effect of hand massage on pain and anxiety in patients after liver transplantation: A randomised controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2020; 39:101152. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
12
|
Markin NW, Kassel CA, Chacon MM. Preoperative Narcotic Weaning in the Perioperative Patient: Now Is the Time. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:1822-1823. [PMID: 32144063 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas W Markin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Cale A Kassel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - M Megan Chacon
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| |
Collapse
|