1
|
Sung CS, Wei TJ, Hung JJ, Su FW, Ho SI, Lin MW, Chan KC, Wu CY. Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2024; 95:111448. [PMID: 38489966 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). DESIGN Randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. SETTING Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers. PATIENTS One hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS. INTERVENTIONS The anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS Patients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0-6) vs. 0 (0-6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Both anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Sung Sung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Jung Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jung-Jyh Hung
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Wei Su
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-I Ho
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mong-Wei Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Cheng Chan
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Chun-Yu Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xin L, Wang L, Feng Y. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 2024; 71:784-792. [PMID: 37989939 PMCID: PMC11233300 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02637-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for analgesia after MIDCAB. METHODS We conducted randomized controlled trial in 60 patients undergoing MIDCAB who received either a single-shot ESPB with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (ESPB group, n = 30) or normal saline 0.9% (control group, n = 30). The primary outcome was numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest within 48 hr postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included postoperative NRS pain scores on deep inspiration within 48 hr, hydromorphone consumption, and quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 and 48 hr. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the ESPB group had lower NRS pain scores at rest at 6 hr (estimated mean difference, -2.1; 99% confidence interval [CI], -2.7 to -1.5; P < 0.001), 12 hr (-1.9; 99% CI, -2.6 to -1.2; P < 0.001), and 18 hr (-1.2; 99% CI, -1.8 to -0.6; P < 0.001) after surgery. The ESPB group also showed lower pain scores on deep inspiration at 6 hr (-2.9; 99% CI, -3.6 to -2.1; P < 0.001), 12 hr (-2.3; 99% CI, -3.1 to -1.5; P < 0.001), and 18 hr (-1.0; 99% CI, -1.8 to -0.2; P = 0.01) postoperatively. Patients in the ESPB group had lower total intraoperative fentanyl use, lower 24-hr hydromorphone consumption, a shorter time to extubation, and a shorter time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. CONCLUSION Erector spinae plane block provided early effective postoperative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption, time to extubation, and ICU discharge in patients undergoing MIDCAB. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100052810); registered 5 November 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Xin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oostvogels L, Weibel S, Meißner M, Kranke P, Meyer-Frießem CH, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Schnabel A. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 2:CD013763. [PMID: 38345071 PMCID: PMC10860379 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013763.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute and chronic postoperative pain are important healthcare problems, which can be treated with a combination of opioids and regional anaesthesia. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new regional anaesthesia technique, which might be able to reduce opioid consumption and related side effects. OBJECTIVES To compare the analgesic effects and side effect profile of ESPB against no block, placebo block or other regional anaesthetic techniques. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science on 4 January 2021 and updated the search on 3 January 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia were included. We included ESPB in comparison with no block, placebo blocks or other regional anaesthesia techniques irrespective of language, publication year, publication status or technique of regional anaesthesia used (ultrasound, landmarks or peripheral nerve stimulator). Quasi-RCTs, cluster-RCTs, cross-over trials and studies investigating co-interventions in either arm were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed all trials for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and risk of bias (RoB), and extracted data. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and we used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence for the primary outcomes. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest at 24 hours and block-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest (2, 48 hours) and during activity (2, 24 and 48 hours after surgery), chronic pain after three and six months, as well as cumulative oral morphine requirements at 2, 24 and 48 hours after surgery and rates of opioid-related side effects. MAIN RESULTS We identified 69 RCTs in the first search and included these in the systematic review. We included 64 RCTs (3973 participants) in the meta-analysis. The outcome postoperative pain was reported in 38 out of 64 studies; block-related adverse events were reported in 40 out of 64 studies. We assessed RoB as low in 44 (56%), some concerns in 24 (31%) and high in 10 (13%) of the study results. Overall, 57 studies reported one or both primary outcomes. Only one study reported results on chronic pain after surgery. In the updated literature search on 3 January 2022 we found 37 new studies and categorised these as awaiting classification. ESPB compared to no block There is probably a slight but not clinically relevant reduction in pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery in patients treated with ESPB compared to no block (visual analogue scale (VAS), 0 to 10 points) (mean difference (MD) -0.77 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.08 to -0.46; 17 trials, 958 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events between the groups treated with ESPB and those receiving no block (no events in 18 trials reported, 1045 participants, low-certainty evidence). ESPB compared to placebo block ESPB probably has no effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to placebo block (MD -0.14 points, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.00; 8 trials, 499 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events between ESPB and placebo blocks (no events in 10 trials reported; 592 participants; low-certainty evidence). ESPB compared to other regional anaesthetic techniques Paravertebral block (PVB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to PVB (MD 0.23 points, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.52; 7 trials, 478 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is probably no difference in block-related adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.95; 7 trials, 522 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to TAPB (MD -0.16 points, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.14; 3 trials, 160 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.83; 4 trials, 202 participants; low-certainty evidence). Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) The effect on postoperative pain could not be assessed because no studies reported this outcome. There may be no difference in block-related adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.59; 2 trials, 110 participants; low-certainty evidence). Pectoralis plane block (PECSB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to PECSB (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.58; 2 trials, 98 participants; low-certainty evidence). The effect on block-related adverse events could not be assessed. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) Only one study reported on each of the primary outcomes. Intercostal nerve block (ICNB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to ICNB, but this is uncertain (MD -0.33 points, 95% CI -3.02 to 2.35; 2 trials, 131 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events, but this is uncertain (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.28; 3 trials, 181 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Epidural analgesia (EA) We are uncertain whether ESPB has an effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to EA (MD 1.20 points, 95% CI -2.52 to 4.93; 2 trials, 81 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A risk ratio for block-related adverse events was not estimable because only one study reported this outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS ESPB in addition to standard care probably does not improve postoperative pain intensity 24 hours after surgery compared to no block. The number of block-related adverse events following ESPB was low. Further research is required to study the possibility of extending the duration of analgesia. We identified 37 new studies in the updated search and there are three ongoing studies, suggesting possible changes to the effect estimates and the certainty of the evidence in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Oostvogels
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Stephanie Weibel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Meißner
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Peter Kranke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Christine H Meyer-Frießem
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bochum, Germany
| | - Esther Pogatzki-Zahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Alexander Schnabel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feray S, Lemoine A, Aveline C, Quesnel C. Pain management after thoracic surgery or chest trauma. Minerva Anestesiol 2023; 89:1022-1033. [PMID: 37671536 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.23.17291-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Accidental or surgically induced thoracic trauma is responsible for significant pain that can impact patient outcomes. One of the main objectives of its pain management is to promote effective coughing and early mobilization to reduce atelectasis and ventilation disorders induced by pulmonary contusion. The incidence of chronic pain can affect more than 35% of patients after both thoracotomy and thoracoscopy as well as after chest trauma. As the severity of acute pain is associated with the incidence of chronic pain, early and effective pain management is very important. In this narrative review, we propose to detail systemic and regional analgesia techniques to minimize postoperative pain, while reducing transitional pain, surgical stress response and opioid side effects. We provide the reader with practical recommendations based on both literature and clinical practice experience in a referral level III thoracic trauma center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Feray
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France -
| | - Adrien Lemoine
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Aveline
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Sévigné Hospital, Cesson Sévigné, France
| | - Christophe Quesnel
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma B, Si R. Commentary on: Hemihepatic versus total hepatic inflow occlusion for laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2023; 109:3189-3190. [PMID: 37133982 PMCID: PMC10583916 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ruohuang Si
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ma G, Gou J, Chen L, Qiao X. Analgesic comparison of erector spinae plane block with intercostal nerve block for thoracoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e35093. [PMID: 37747029 PMCID: PMC10519539 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus intercostal nerve block (ICNB) for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of ESPB versus ICNB on thoracoscopic surgery. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of ESPB versus ICNB on thoracoscopic surgery. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity. RESULTS Four RCTs and 203 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with ICNB for thoracoscopic surgery, ESPB results in significantly reduced pain scores at 48 hours (SMD [standard mean difference] = -3.49; 95% CI [confidence interval] = -6.76 to -0.21; P = .04), but demonstrated no impact on pain scores at 24 hours (SMD = -0.04; 95% CI = -1.24 to 1.16; P = .95), pain scores at 4 to 6 hours (SMD = -0.16; 95% CI = -2.02 to 1.71; P = .87), pain scores at 12 hours (SMD = -0.16; 95% CI = -2.38 to 2.05; P = .88) or analgesic consumption (SMD = 0.27; 95% CI = -0.80 to 1.35; P = .62). CONCLUSIONS ESPB may be comparable with ICNB for the postoperative pain control of thoracoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guineng Ma
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Tianshui Second People’s Hospital, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jiwei Gou
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Tianshui Second People’s Hospital, Gansu Province, China
| | - Limimg Chen
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Tianshui Second People’s Hospital, Gansu Province, China
| | - Xiaojian Qiao
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Tianshui Second People’s Hospital, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gams P, Bitenc M, Danojevic N, Jensterle T, Sadikov A, Groznik V, Sostaric M. Erector spinae plane block versus intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in lung cancer surgery. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:364-370. [PMID: 37665743 PMCID: PMC10476902 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent trend in postoperative analgesia for lung cancer surgery relies on regional nerve blocks with decreased opioid administration. Our study aims to critically assess the continuous ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at our institution and compare it to a standard regional anesthetic technique, the intercostal nerve block (ICNB). PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective randomized-control study was performed to compare outcomes of patients, scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lung cancer resection, allocated to the ESPB or ICNB group. Primary outcomes were total opioid consumption and subjective pain scores at rest and cough each hour in 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcome was respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP) after 24 h and 48 h. RESULTS 60 patients met the inclusion criteria, half ESPB. Total opioid consumption in the first 48 h was 21. 64 ± 14.22 mg in the ESPB group and 38.34 ± 29.91 mg in the ICNB group (p = 0.035). The patients in the ESPB group had lower numerical rating scores at rest than in the ICNB group (1.19 ± 0.73 vs. 1.77 ± 1.01, p = 0.039). There were no significant differences in MIP/MEP decrease from baseline after 24 h (MIP p = 0.088, MEP p = 0.182) or 48 h (MIP p = 0.110, MEP p = 0.645), time to chest tube removal or hospital discharge between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In the first 48 h after surgery, patients with continuous ESPB required fewer opioids and reported less pain than patients with ICNB. There were no differences regarding respiratory muscle strength, postoperative complications, and time to hospital discharge. In addition, continuous ESPB demanded more surveillance than ICNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polona Gams
- Surgery Bitenc, Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Golnik, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Marko Bitenc
- Surgery Bitenc, Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Golnik, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Aleksander Sadikov
- Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vida Groznik
- Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
| | - Maja Sostaric
- Surgery Bitenc, Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Golnik, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hsieh M, Kim D, Peng D, Schisler T, Cook RC. Regional Anesthesia With Paravertebral Blockade Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minithoracotomy Cardiac Surgery. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 18:357-364. [PMID: 37585808 PMCID: PMC10478324 DOI: 10.1177/15569845231190638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Severe postoperative pain has been shown to affect many patients following minimally invasive cardiac surgeries (MICS). Multimodal pain management with regional anesthesia, particularly by delivery of local anesthetics using a paravertebral catheter (PVC), has been shown to reduce pain in operations involving thoracotomy incisions. However, few studies have reported high-quality safety and efficacy outcomes of PVCs following MICS. METHODS Patients who underwent MICS at Vancouver General Hospital between 2016 and 2019 (N = 123) were reviewed for perioperative opioid-narcotic use. Primary outcomes were postoperative opioid use and hospital length of stay (LOS). Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariable regression models to determine independent risk factors. RESULTS A total of 54 patients received routine systemic analgesia (control), 53 patients received a paravertebral catheter (PVC), and 16 patients received another mode of regional analgesia (non-PVC). The mean hospital LOS was significantly different in patients in the PVC group at 5.8 ± 2.0 days versus 8.3 ± 7.1 days in the control and 6.6 ± 2.3 days in the non-PVC group (P = 0.033). The percentage of patients who did not require postoperative oxycodone was significantly higher in the PVC group (48.1%), compared with the control (24.5%) and non-PVC (37.5%; P = 0.043) groups. CONCLUSIONS The administration of regional anesthesia using PVCs was associated with reduced need for opioids and a shorter LOS. The reduction in postoperative opioids may reduce the risk of potential opioid dependency in this population. Future studies should involve randomized controlled trials with systematic evaluation of pain scores to verify current study results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Hsieh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Diane Kim
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Defen Peng
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Travis Schisler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Richard C. Cook
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malan SH, Jaroszewski DE, Craner RC, Weis RA, Murray AW, Meinhardt JR, Girardo ME, Abdelrazek AS, Borah BJ, Dholakia R, Smith BB. Erector Spinae Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: Analgesic Adjunct in Adult Pectus Surgery. J Surg Res 2023; 289:171-181. [PMID: 37121043 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain management may be challenging in patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) bar removal surgery. To enhance recovery, opioid sparing strategies with regional anesthesia including ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been implemented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral ESPB with a liposomal bupivacaine/traditional bupivacaine mixture as part of an enhanced patient recovery pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent PE bar removal from January 2019 to December 2020 was performed. Perioperative data were reviewed and recorded. Patients who received ESPB were compared to historical controls (non-ESPB patients). RESULTS A total of 202 patients were included (non-ESPB: 124 patients; ESPB: 78 patients). No adverse events were attributed to ESPB. Non-ESPB patients received more intraoperative opioids (milligram morphine equivalents; 41.8 ± 17.0 mg versus 36.7 ± 17.1, P = 0.05) and were more likely to present to the emergency department within 7 d postoperatively (4.8% versus 0%, P = 0.05) when compared to ESPB patients. No significant difference in total perioperative milligram morphine equivalents, severe pain in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time from PACU arrival to analgesic administration, PACU length of stay, or postprocedure admission rates between groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PE bar removal surgery, bilateral ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine was performed without complications. ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine may be considered as an analgesic adjunct to enhance recovery in patients undergoing cardiothoracic procedures but further prospective randomized clinical trials comparing liposomal bupivacaine to traditional local anesthetics with and without indwelling nerve catheters are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn H Malan
- Adult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas
| | - Dawn E Jaroszewski
- Professor of Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Ryan C Craner
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Ricardo A Weis
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Andrew W Murray
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Ahmad S Abdelrazek
- Research Fellow, Cardiovascular Surgery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bijan J Borah
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science Robert D. & Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ruchita Dholakia
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science Robert D. & Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bradford B Smith
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bellini R, Salandini MC, Granieri S, Chierici A, Passaretta R, Cotsoglou C. Erector spine plane block as single loco-regional anesthesia in non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery for unfit patients: a case-match study. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01464-0. [PMID: 36820964 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01464-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
In the present study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopy (NI-VATS) for the diagnosis and palliation of malignant pleural effusion in the elderly population using erector-spinae plane block (ESPB) as single loco-regional anesthesia. From January 2016 to December 2020 a consecutive series of 158 patients who underwent surgery for malignant pleural effusion was analyzed. Of these, 20 patients were operated using ESPB NI-VATS, while 138 were operated under general anesthesia (GA). After propensity score matching, the NI-VATS population was older (81 vs. 76 years p 0.006), and had more severe pre-existing comorbidities, evaluated using Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.029) and ASA score (p < 0.001). GA and NI-VATS patients did not differ in terms of postoperative opioid consumption, complication rate and postoperative hospitalization. Both short- and long-term efficacy of talc poudrage was equal in the two populations. The overall length of stay in the operative room was significantly shorter for the NI-VATS than for the GA-VATS group (67.5 vs. 105 min, p < 0.001), and operative time significantly differed in the two groups (35 vs. 47.5 min, respectively, p < 0.001). ESPB NI-VATS can be a safe and effective option for the diagnosis and palliation of malignant pleural effusion for elderly and frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Bellini
- General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Salandini
- General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy.
| | - Stefano Granieri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Andrea Chierici
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier d'Antibes Juan-Les-Pins, 107, av. de Nice, 06600, Antibes, France
| | - Rita Passaretta
- Anesthesia and Resuscitation Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Christian Cotsoglou
- General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Balzani E, Rosboch GL, Ceraolo E, Lyberis P, Filippini C, Piccioni F, Guerrera F, Ruffini E, Pedoto A, Brazzi L. The effect of peripheral regional analgesia in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. TUMORI JOURNAL 2023; 109:6-18. [PMID: 35361015 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221081891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several peripheral regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques are commonly used in thoracic surgery even in the absence of precise indications regarding their effectiveness on postoperative pain management. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to describe and evaluate the relative effectiveness of different peripheral regional blocks and systemic analgesia in the context of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy. DESIGN Systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed and Embase for all RCTs comparing the 24 hour morphine equivalents (MMEs) consumption following peripheral regional blocks and systemic analgesia (SA). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We selected only RCTs including adult participants undergoing thoracic surgery, including esophagectomy and reporting on postoperative pain outcomes including 24 hour MMEs consumption. RESULTS Among the 28 randomized studies including adult participants undergoing thoracic surgery and reporting on 24 hour opioid consumption, 11 reporting a comparison of individual blocks with systemic analgesia were meta-analyzed. RA was effective for almost all peripheral blocks. Regarding intercostal block, its antalgic effect was not well evaluated SMD -1.57 (CI -3.88, 0.73). RA in VATS was more effective in reducing MMEs than thoracotomy SMD -1.10 (CI -1.78, -0.41). CONCLUSIONS RA is a useful choice in thoracic surgery. However, it is still not possible to determine the most appropriate block in the individual surgical settings to be performed due to RCTs paucity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Balzani
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Giulio Luca Rosboch
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ceraolo
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Lyberis
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Clinical Statistics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Bramante 88, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piccioni
- General and Specialistic Surgical Department, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Guerrera
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Enrico Ruffini
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Alessia Pedoto
- Clinical Attending Department of Anesthesia and CCM, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Luca Brazzi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' Hospital, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Su P, Kong M, Yang E. Effect of combined erector-spinae plane blocks on the immediate postoperative neuronal and stress biomarkers after thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancers. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:405-411. [PMID: 35581042 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the impact of general anesthesia combined with erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) on patients who underwent thoracoscopic radical resection (TRR) for lung cancer. METHODS There involved a total of 108 patients undergoing TRR for lung cancers. Patients enrolled were equally allocated into experimental group (general anesthesia combined with ESPB) and control group (general anesthesia). The following parameters, including baseline characteristics, serum markers of neurological disorders, postoperative pain degree, dosage of narcotic, adverse events and early postoperative rehabilitation quality, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Based on Visual Analogue Scale, the postoperative pain degree was significantly lower in experimental group on 6h postoperative (P<0.001). And markedly lower results were observed in the levels of serum markers of neurological disorders in the experimental group one day after surgery (all P<0.05). Moreover, the dosage of narcotic and early postoperative rehabilitation quality based on QoR-40 scale were significantly lower in experimental group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION Adding ESPB with general anesthesia reduce the postoperative pain up to 6 h, reduce the requirement of postoperative narcotic and help early postoperative rehabilitation quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Su
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Min Kong
- Department of Pharmacy, The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - En Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sandeep B, Huang X, Li Y, Xiong D, Zhu B, Xiao Z. A comparison of regional anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: A network meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 105:106840. [PMID: 36030040 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain control remains challenging in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study aimed to investigate the relative efficacy of different regional anesthesia interventions for VATS using a Network Meta analysis (NMA). METHODS A literature search was conducted for NMA using Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the analgesic effects of different regional analgesia techniques from inception to February 2022. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were morphine consumption at 48 h postoperatively, pain intensity, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and hospital length of stay. Pain scores at two different intervals from different regional analgesia techniques were measured and investigated in this NMA. RESULTS A total of 38 RCTs (2224 patients) were included. Two studies compared three arm interventions of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) vs. thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) vs. erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively, and showed patients who received TPVB had less demand for morphine than ICNB and ESPB (P = 0.001, P = 0.001). For resting pain scores at 24 h postoperatively, ESPB was superior to serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) (P = 0.01), and TPVB provided effective analgesia compared to ICNB, retrolaminar block (RLB), and ESPB (P = 0.05, P = 0.01, P = 0.03). Similarly, pain scores at rest at 48 h, SAPB and TPVB showed the best results (P = 0.04, P = 0.001, P = 0.01) compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA), ICNB, RLB, and ESPB. Additionally, pain scores at coughing at 24 h and 48 h, TPVB showed superior results compared with RLB,ESPB(P = 0.02, P = 0.02, P = 0.03). SAPB was superior to LIA in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION In regional anaesthesia, TPVB is a better option than other analgesic methods, and its combination with other methods can be beneficial. However, our findings can only provide objective evidence. Clinicians should choose the treatment course based on the individual patient's condition and clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhushan Sandeep
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, China.
| | - Xin Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, China.
| | - Dan Xiong
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, China.
| | - Bo Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, China.
| | - Zongwei Xiao
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Toscano A, Capuano P, Costamagna A, Canavosio FG, Ferrero D, Alessandrini EM, Giunta M, Rinaldi M, Brazzi L. Is continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) better than continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) for mitral valve surgery via mini-thoracotomy? Results from a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth 2022; 25:286-292. [PMID: 35799555 PMCID: PMC9387628 DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_69_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Chest wall blocks are effective alternatives for postoperative pain control in mitral valve surgery in right mini-thoracotomy (mini-MVS). We compared the efficacy of Serratus Anterior plane block (SAPB) and Erector Spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative pain relief after mini-MVS. Settings and Design It is a prospective, observational study. Material and Methods A total of 85 consecutive patients undergoing continuous SAPB and continuous ESPB for mini-MVS from March 2019 to October 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the assessment of postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12, 24 and 48 h. Secondary outcomes were assessment of salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of mild adverse effects (i.e. nausea, vomiting, and incorrect catheter placement) and timing of postoperative course (ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days). Results The median NRS was 0.00 (0.00-3.00) at 12 h and 0.00 (0.00-2.00) at 24 and 48 h. No significant differences were observed between groups. Postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 h was similar in both groups (P = 0.76), whereas between 24 and 48 h was significantly less in the ESPB group compared with SAPB group, P = 0.013. NSAIDs median consumption and Metoclopramide consumption were significantly lower in the ESPB group compared to SAPB group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.048, respectively). Conclusions ESPB, even more than SAPB, appears to be a feasible and effective strategy for the management of postoperative pain, allowing good quality analgesia with low consumption of opioids, NSAIDs and antiemetic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Toscano
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Capuano
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Costamagna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico G Canavosio
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Ferrero
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Giunta
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Rinaldi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Brazzi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza' Hospital; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sertcakacilar G, Kose S. Bilateral PECS II block is associated with decreased opioid consumption and reduced pain scores for up to 24 hours after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (Nuss procedure): a retrospective analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:3833-3840. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
16
|
Hamilton C, Alfille P, Mountjoy J, Bao X. Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2022; 14:2276-2296. [PMID: 35813725 PMCID: PMC9264080 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objective Thoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research. Methods We searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms “thoracic surgery”, “thoracic surgery AND pain management”, “thoracic surgery AND analgesia”, “thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia”, “thoracic surgery AND epidural”. We considered articles written in English and available to the reader. Key Content and Findings There is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate. Conclusions The optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Hamilton
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul Alfille
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremi Mountjoy
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaodong Bao
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sherazee EA, Chen SA, Li D, Li D, Frank P, Kiaii B. Pain Management Strategies for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2022; 17:167-176. [PMID: 35521910 DOI: 10.1177/15569845221091779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elan A Sherazee
- Department of Surgery, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Sarah A Chen
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David Li
- Department of Pharmacy Services, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Paul Frank
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Bob Kiaii
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yuan Z, Liu J, Jiao K, Fan Y, Zhang Y. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improve opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung lesion resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Transl Pediatr 2022; 11:706-714. [PMID: 35685082 PMCID: PMC9173882 DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric patients often experience severe pain after thoracic surgery, especially in the early postoperative period. Recently, the focus has been on regional analgesia with the introduction of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks. We assumed that preoperative erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in children undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) would reduce the consumption of perioperative opioids. METHODS This randomized, double-blind study enrolled 60 children aged 1-3 years who underwent thoracoscopic lung lesion resection. The patients were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups. The general anesthesia (GA) group received GA alone, and the GA + ESPB group received ESPB. The consumptions of remifentanil and sufentanil were recorded, and the children's face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scores were assessed after awakening. The time to first rescue analgesia, length of hospital stay, parental satisfaction and adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS The consumptions of remifentanil and sufentanil in the GA + ESPB group were significantly lower than those in the GA group, mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -26.57 (-31.98 to -21.17) and -0.21 (-0.27 to -0.17), respectively, (both P<0.001); while the time to first rescue analgesia and parental satisfaction scores were significantly longer and higher, respectively, in the GA + ESPB group than those in the GA group, mean difference (95% CI): 2.37 (1.77 to 2.97) and 2.47 (1.79 to 3.15), respectively, (both P<0.001). The FLACC scores in the GA + ESPB group were significantly lower than those in the GA group 1 to 24 hours postoperatively (P=0.023 at 1 h, and P<0.001 at 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 18 h, 24 h), but not at immediate admission to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (P=0.189 at 0 h). The GA + ESPB group had significantly lower incidence rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.037 and P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS In pediatric Thoracoscopic surgery, the results of this study confirm our hypothesis that ESPB decreases the consumptions of intraoperative remifentanil and postoperative sufentanil in 24 hours and demonstrates better postoperative analgesia compared with a control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200056166.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihao Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jinzhu Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kun Jiao
- Operating Room, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Fan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yanjun Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hoan DT, Hung DD, Dat PQ, Tu NH. Continuous Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Intravenous Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.9071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: the study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of anesthesia under the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Methods: a prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out in 56 adult patients who underwent MICS via a right thoracic incision at Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai hospital, Vietnam. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: ESPB and conventional analgesia (intravenousmorphine patient-controlled analgesia, PCA). Patients in ESPB group received ultrasound-guided unilateral ESPB at the T4/T5 transverse process level, and the tip of the catheter was advanced 5cm beyond the tip of the needle; injected with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5%. At the cardiac ICU, patients received paracetamol (1g every 6 hours), continuous infusion ropivacaine 0.1% 0.2ml/kg/hour. Patients in the PCA group received paracetamol (1g every 6 hours) and intravenous morphine PCA. All patients were followed for 72 hours after being extubated. Results: the resting VAS score was significantly lower in ESPB group at the time H4, H8, H12, H16, H36, H42, H48, H54, H60, H66 after extubated compared to that of the PCA group (p< 0.05). The dynamic VAS score at was also significantly lower in the ESPB group at all measured time points (p<0.05). Only 4 patients in the ESPB group required intravenous morphine PCA with the mean amount morphine were statistically lower in the ESPB group compared to the PCA group at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours postoperative. No serious adverse events such as neurological complications, bleeding or infection were observed in both groups. Conclusion: ESPB is an effective analgesic for MICS via thoracic incision in reducing the VAS score and the morphine required. It is also a safe method with no severe ESPB-related complications.
Collapse
|
20
|
Elshafie MA, Khalil MK, ElSheikh ML, Mowafy NI. Erector Spinae Block with Opioid Free Anesthesia in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Local Reg Anesth 2022; 15:1-10. [PMID: 35115825 PMCID: PMC8801329 DOI: 10.2147/lra.s343347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatic resection is a major abdominal surgery with challenging pain management. We aimed to investigate the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with opioid free anesthesia (OFA) in cirrhotic patients scheduled for liver resection on perioperative pain management in terms of hemodynamic stability. Secondarily, we assessed time to first request for analgesia and perioperative fentanyl consumption, nausea and vomiting within 24 hours after surgery. Methods Forty patients were randomized to block group (n = 20): OFA with ESPB and conventional group (n = 20): conventional balanced anesthesia with opioids (OFA associated non-opioid drugs [dexmedetomidine, magnesium sulfate, xylocaine, and acetaminophen] and ESPB). Bilateral ESP block was done with ultrasound guidance at the level of thoracic vertebrae T 6–7, the local anesthetic dose was 20 mL Bupivacaine 0.25% with adjuvant dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) on each side. We monitored hemodynamic stability as the primary endpoint (heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and cardiac output). Results Bilateral ESPB offered somatic and visceral analgesia for hepatic resection patients with no intraoperative fentanyl required. Postoperatively, the block group with dexmedetomidine adjuvant to the local anesthesia drugs showed delay in the first request for analgesia (p = 0.092) and decreased fentanyl requirement (p < 0.001), so no patient in the ESP group suffered from postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to 50% in the conventional group (p < 0.001). Conclusion Bilateral ESP block with OFA is an effective approach for intra- and postoperative analgesia in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minatallah A Elshafie
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Sheeben Elkom City, Egypt
- Correspondence: Minatallah A Elshafie, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Sheeben Elkom City, Egypt, Tel +20 111 224 8935, Email
| | - Magdy K Khalil
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Sheeben Elkom City, Egypt
| | - Maha L ElSheikh
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Sheeben Elkom City, Egypt
| | - Nagwa I Mowafy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Sheeben Elkom City, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gao X, Zhao T, Xu G, Ren C, Liu G, Du K. The Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided, Bi-Level, Erector Spinae Plane Block With Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine for Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:577885. [PMID: 34901039 PMCID: PMC8655682 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.577885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided bi-level erector spinae plane block (ESPB) plus dexmedetomidine (Dex) remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided bi-level ESPB plus different doses of Dex in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Methods: One-hundred eight patients undergoing VATS were randomized into three groups: R group (n = 38, 15 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine with 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone), RD1 group (n = 38, 15 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg/kg DEX with 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone) and RD2 group (n = 38, 15 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 1.0 μg/kg DEX with 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone). The primary outcome was the pain 12 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the Prince Henry Hospital Pain Score; hemodynamics; consumption of sufentanil; anesthetized dermatomal distribution; recovery time; rescue analgesia; satisfaction scores of patients and surgeon; quick recovery index; adverse effects; the prevalence of chronic pain and quality of recovery. Results: The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Prince Henry pain score were significantly lower in both the RD1 and RD2 groups during the first 24 h after surgery (P
< 0.05). Both VAS with coughing and the Prince Henry pain score were significantly lower in the RD2 group than in the RD1 group 8–24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Both heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly different from T2 to T6 in the RD1 and RD2 groups (P < 0.05). The receipt of remifentanil, propofol, Dex, and recovery time was significantly reduced in the RD2 group (P < 0.05). The requirement for sufentanil during the 8–72 h after surgery, less rescue medication, and total press times were significantly lower in the RD2 group (P < 0.05). The time to the first dose of rescue ketorolac was significantly longer in the RD2 group (P < 0.05). Further, anal exhaust, removal of chest tubes, and ambulation were significantly shorter in the RD2 group (P < 0.05). The incidence of tachycardia, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and chronic pain was significantly reduced in the RD2 group, while the QoR-40 score was significantly higher in the RD2 group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Pre-operative bi-level, single-injection ESPB plus 1 μg/kg DEX provided superior pain relief and long-term post-operative recovery for patients undergoing VATS. Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiujuan Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Tonghang Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Guangjun Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Chunguang Ren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Guoying Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Ke Du
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guerra-Londono CE, Privorotskiy A, Cozowicz C, Hicklen RS, Memtsoudis SG, Mariano ER, Cata JP. Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2133394. [PMID: 34779845 PMCID: PMC8593761 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The use of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) analgesia with local anesthesia is common in thoracic surgery. However, the benefits and safety of ICNB among adult patients undergoing surgery is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the analgesic benefits and safety of ICNB among adults undergoing thoracic surgery. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using terms for ICNB and thoracic surgery (including thoracic surgery, thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, nerve block, intercostal nerves). The search and results were not limited by date, with the last search conducted on July 24, 2020. STUDY SELECTION Selected studies were experimental or observational and included adult patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery in which ICNB was administered with local anesthesia via single injection, continuous infusion, or a combination of both techniques in at least 1 group of patients. For comparison with ICNB, studies that examined systemic analgesia and different forms of regional analgesia (such as thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA], paravertebral block [PVB], and other techniques) were included. These criteria were applied independently by 2 authors, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. A total of 694 records were selected for screening. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data including patient characteristics, type of surgery, intervention analgesia, comparison analgesia, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted independently by 3 authors. Synthesis was performed using a fixed-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The coprimary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity (measured as the worst static or dynamic pain using a validated 10-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain) and opioid consumption (measured in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) at prespecified intervals (0-6 hours, 7-24 hours, 25-48 hours, 49-72 hours, and >72 hours). Clinically relevant analgesia was defined as a 1-point or greater difference in pain intensity score at any interval. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and pulmonary function. RESULTS Of 694 records screened, 608 were excluded based on prespecified exclusion criteria. The remaining 86 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 20 of those articles were excluded. All of the 66 remaining studies (5184 patients; mean [SD] age, 53.9 [10.2] years; approximately 59% men and 41% women) were included in the qualitative analysis, and 59 studies (3325 patients) that provided data for at least 1 outcome were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Experimental studies had a high risk of bias in multiple domains, including allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessors. Marked differences (eg, crossover studies, timing of the intervention [intraoperative vs postoperative], blinding, and type of control group) were observed in the design and implementation of studies. The use of ICNB vs systemic analgesia was associated with lower static pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.40 points [95% CI, -1.46 to -1.33 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.27 points [95% CI, -1.40 to -1.13 points]) and lower dynamic pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.66 points [95% CI, -1.90 to -1.41 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.43 points [95% CI, -1.70 to -1.17 points]). Intercostal nerve block analgesia was noninferior to TEA (mean score difference in worst dynamic panic at 7-24 hours after surgery: 0.79 points; 95% CI, 0.28-1.29 points) and marginally inferior to PVB (mean score difference in worst dynamic pain at 7-24 hours after surgery: 1.29 points; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41 points). The largest opioid-sparing effect of ICNB vs systemic analgesia occurred at 48 hours after surgery (mean difference, -10.97 MMEs; 95% CI, -12.92 to -9.02 MMEs). The use of ICNB was associated with higher MME values compared with TEA (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 48.31 MMEs; 95% CI, 36.11-60.52 MMEs) and PVB (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 3.87 MMEs; 95% CI, 2.59-5.15 MMEs). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, single-injection ICNB was associated with a reduction in pain during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery and was clinically noninferior to TEA or PVB. Intercostal nerve block analgesia had opioid-sparing effects; however, TEA and PVB were associated with larger decreases in postoperative MMEs, suggesting that ICNB may be most beneficial for cases in which TEA and PVB are not indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E. Guerra-Londono
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston
| | | | - Crispiana Cozowicz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Rachel S. Hicklen
- Research Medical Library, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston
| | | | - Edward R. Mariano
- Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Juan P. Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Turhan Ö, Sivrikoz N, Sungur Z, Duman S, Özkan B, Şentürk M. Thoracic Paravertebral Block Achieves Better Pain Control Than Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve Block in Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35:2920-2927. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
24
|
Gado AA, Abdalwahab A, Ali H, Alsadek WM, Ismail AA. Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:2271-2277. [PMID: 34607760 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) as an analgesic technique for thoracotomies in pediatric patients. DESIGN Double-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING A single-center study at Aboelrish Pediatric Hospital, one tertiary hospital of Cairo University Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Seventy pediatric patients aged six months-to-three years scheduled for thoracotomies. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized into two groups, group SF and group F. Group SF received an ultrasound-guided SAPB (n = 35), whereas group F (n = 35) did not. All groups received an intraoperative fentanyl infusion (at 0.5 μg/kg /h). MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was the total dose of postoperatively administrated fentanyl in the first 24 hours. The secondary outcomes included the total dose of intraoperative additional fentanyl boluses; time of the first postoperative rescue analgesia; and postoperative Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC) score values. MAIN RESULTS The main results of this study showed that the administrated fentanyl in the 24 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in SF group than in F group (p value ˂ 0.001). In addition, significant decreases of the postoperative FLACC pain score (p value ˂ 0.001), reduction of intraoperative fentanyl consumption (p value ˂ 0.001), and delay of the first rescue analgesia (p value ˂ 0.001) were recorded in SF group in relation to F group without significant complications in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Serratus anterior plane block can provide a safe, effective, and easy-to-perform regional technique for children undergoing thoracotomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Ali Gado
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Department of Anesthesia, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Abdalwahab
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Department of Anesthesia, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Hassan Ali
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Department of Anesthesia, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Wafaa Mohamed Alsadek
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Department of Anesthesia, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Abdelaziz Ismail
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Department of Anesthesia, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Continuous Perineural Local Anesthetic Infusion for Postoperative Pain Control After Supraclavicular Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Matched Case-Control Comparison. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 77:236-242. [PMID: 34455047 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.05.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine if single injection erector spinae plane blocks are associated with improved pain control, opioid use, numbness, length of stay, or patient satisfaction compared to intraoperatively placed continuous perineural infusion of local anesthetic after decompression of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center of eighty patients that underwent supraclavicular decompression for thoracic outlet syndrome between May 2019 and January 2020. Forty consecutive patients treated with single-injection preoperative erector spinae plane blocks were retrospectively compared to 40 age- and gender-matched controls treated with continuous perineural infusion. RESULTS The primary outcome of mean pain scores was not significantly different between the erector spinae and perineural infusion groups over the three-day study period (4.2-5.3 vs 3.0-5.1 P=0.08). On post-operative day 0, mean pain scores were significantly higher in the erector spinae group (4.2 vs 3.0, P=0.02). While statistically significant, the score was still lower in the erector spinae group on day 0 than on day 1,2, or 3 in either group. Opioid use, nausea, length of stay and patient satisfaction were also similar. Upper extremity numbness was significantly less severe in the erector spinae group (36% vs 73% moderate-extreme, P=0.03) at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Seventy-two-hour perineural local anesthetic infusion did not provide superior analgesia compared to preoperative single-injection erector spinae blocks. Furthermore, there was significantly less long-term postoperative numbness associated with erector spinae blocks compared to perineural local anesthetic infusion.
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee NS, Kydes A. Regional Anesthetic Approaches for Postoperative Analgesia Following Vertebral Body Tethering: A Case Series. A A Pract 2021; 15:e01510. [PMID: 34428776 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is an innovative surgical technique used to treat juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The optimal anesthetic technique, including the preferred management of postoperative pain, is not known. In this case series, we describe 3 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who received either continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) catheters or intercostal liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management after bilateral VBT via minithoracotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy S Lee
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Koo CH, Lee HT, Na HS, Ryu JH, Shin HJ. Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:1387-1395. [PMID: 34301447 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can provide an effective analgesia for managing pain after thoracic surgery and compare the efficacy of ESPB with that of other regional analgesic techniques. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing thoracic surgeries. INTERVENTION Erector spinae plane block with local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS Seventeen studies, including 1,092 patients, were included in the final analysis. Erector spinae plane block reduced 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean difference [MD] -17.49, 95% CI -26.87 to -8.12), pain score at rest (MD -0.82, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.33), and pain score at movement (MD -0.77, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.3) compared to no block. Compared with other regional blocks, various results have been observed. Although statistical results showed that ESPB is inferior to thoracic paravertebral block and intercostal nerve block and superior to serratus anterior plan block in postoperative analgesia, clinical differences remain unclear. The incidence of hematoma was lower in the ESPB group than in the other groups (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.73). CONCLUSION Erector spinae plane block may provide effective analgesia after thoracic surgery. Compared with other techniques, it is a safer method, without clinically important differences, for postoperative pain control. Therefore, ESPB may be considered as a valuable option for postoperative pain management after thoracic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Hoon Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hun-Taek Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyo-Seok Na
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jung-Hee Ryu
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jung Shin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Boisen ML, Fernando RJ, Kolarczyk L, Teeter E, Schisler T, La Colla L, Melnyk V, Robles C, Rao VK, Gelzinis TA. The Year in Thoracic Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2020. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35:2855-2868. [PMID: 34053812 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Selected highlights in thoracic anesthesia in 2020 include updates in the preoperative assessment and prehabilitation of patients undergoing thoracic surgery; updates in one-lung ventilation (OLV) pertaining to the devices used for OLV; the use of dexmedetomidine for lung protection during OLV and protective ventilation, recommendations for the care of thoracic surgical patients with coronavirus disease 2019; a review of recent meta-analyses comparing truncal blocks with paravertebral and thoracic epidural blocks; and a review of outcomes after initiating the enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines for lung and esophageal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Boisen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Rohesh J Fernando
- Cardiothoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Lavinia Kolarczyk
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Emily Teeter
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Travis Schisler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Luca La Colla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Vladyslav Melnyk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Constantin Robles
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Vidya K Rao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Theresa A Gelzinis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Due to its potential benefits and increased patient satisfaction minimal invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is rapidly gaining in popularity. These procedures are not without challenges and require careful planning, pre-operative patient assessment and excellent intraoperative communication. Assessment of patient suitability for MICS by a multi-disciplinary team during pre-operative workup is desirable. MICS requires additional skills that many might not consider to be part of the standard cardiac anesthetic toolkit. Anesthetists involved in MICS need not only be highly skilled in performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) but need to be proficient in multimodal analgesia, including locoregional or neuroaxial techniques. MICS procedures tend to cause more postoperative pain than standard median sternotomies do, and patients need analgesic management more in keeping with thoracic operations. Ultrasound guided peripheral regional anesthesia techniques like serratus anterior block can offer an advantage over neuroaxial techniques in patients on anti-platelet therapy or anticoagulation with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin The article reviews the salient points pertaining to pre-operative assessment and suitability, intraoperative process and postoperative management of minimally invasive cardiac procedures in the operating theatre as well as the catheterization lab. Special emphasis is given to anesthetic management and analgesia techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander White
- Senior Fellow in Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, The Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Chinmay Patvardhan
- Consultant in Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, The Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Florian Falter
- Consultant in Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, The Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Erector Spinae Plane Block-Block of Choice for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112:1037-1038. [PMID: 33482163 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
31
|
Morley-Jepson K, Maharaj Z, Wagner J. The “new kid” on the fascial plane block: erector spinae block – a narrative review. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 2021. [DOI: 10.36303/sajaa.2021.27.4.2487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K Morley-Jepson
- Helen Joseph Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand,
South Africa
| | - Z Maharaj
- Rahima Moosa Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand
South Africa
| | - J Wagner
- Rahima Moosa Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand
South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia 2021; 76 Suppl 1:110-126. [PMID: 33426660 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall are increasingly popular alternatives to established techniques such as thoracic epidural or paravertebral blockade, as they are simple to perform and have an appealing safety profile. Many different techniques have been described, which can be broadly categorised into anteromedial, anterolateral and posterior chest wall blocks. Understanding the relevant clinical anatomy is critical not only for block performance, but also to match block techniques appropriately with surgical procedures. The sensory innervation of tissues deep to the skin (e.g. muscles, ligaments and bone) can be overlooked, but is often a significant source of pain. The primary mechanism of action for these blocks is a conduction blockade of sensory afferents travelling in the targeted fascial planes, as well as of peripheral nociceptors in the surrounding tissues. A systemic action of absorbed local anaesthetic is plausible but unlikely to be a major contributor. The current evidence for their clinical applications indicates that certain chest wall techniques provide significant benefit in breast and thoracic surgery, similar to that provided by thoracic paravertebral blockade. Their role in trauma and cardiac surgery is evolving and holds great potential. Further avenues of research into these versatile techniques include: optimal local anaesthetic dosing strategies; high-quality randomised controlled trials focusing on patient-centred outcomes beyond acute pain; and comparative studies to determine which of the myriad blocks currently on offer should be core competencies in anaesthetic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Chin
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - B Versyck
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, AZ Turnhout, Belgium.,Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A Pawa
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fiorelli S, Menna C, Piccioni F, Ibrahim M, Rendina EA, Rocco M, Massullo D. The Cutting Edge of Thoracic Anesthesia During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:3203-3210. [PMID: 32631666 PMCID: PMC7276138 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly spread globally, causing a real pandemic. In this critical scenario, lung cancer patients scheduled for surgical treatment need to continue to receive optimal care while protecting them from an eventual severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Adequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) and a COVID-19 specific intraoperative management are paramount in order to prevent cross infections. New suggestions or improvement of existing contagion control guidance are needed, even in case of non-symptomatic patients, possibly responsible for virus spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Fiorelli
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Cecilia Menna
- Thoracic Surgery, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Piccioni
- Department of Critical Care and Supportive Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohsen Ibrahim
- Thoracic Surgery, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Erino Angelo Rendina
- Thoracic Surgery, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Rocco
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Massullo
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Saadawi M, Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Leurcharusmee P, Tran DQ. Erector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocks. J Clin Anesth 2020; 68:110063. [PMID: 33032124 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE This narrative review discusses the anatomy, mechanism of action, techniques, pharmacology, indications, complications and substitutes for erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks. INTERVENTIONS The Medline, Embase and Google Scholar databases (inception-last week of April 2020) were searched. For indications and alternative blocks, a systematic analysis of the available evidence was carried out. In order to highlight the best evidence available, only randomized trials with prospective registration, blinded assessment and sample size justification were retained for analysis. MAIN RESULTS The collective body of anatomical studies suggests that ESP block may work through a combination of different mechanisms (e.g., local anesthetic spread to the thoracic paravertebral space, epidural space, and dorsal ramus). Compared to control, the available evidence suggests that ESP block results in decreased postoperative pain and opioid requirement for a wide array of thoracic and abdominal surgical interventions. Erector spinae plane blocks and thoracic paravertebral blocks seem to provide comparable benefits for thoracoscopic and breast cancer surgery when performed with a similar number of injections. Currently, ESP blocks should be favored over intercostal blocks since, at best, the latter provide similar analgesia to ESP blocks despite requiring multiple-level injections. CONCLUSIONS In recent years, ESP blocks have become the topic of considerable clinical interest. Future trials are required to investigate their optimal technique, dose of local anesthetic and perineural adjuvants. Moreover, additional investigation should compare ESP blocks with robust multimodal analgesic regimens as well as truncal blocks such as thoracic epidural block, midpoint transverse process to pleura block, PECS block, quadratus lumborum block, and transversus abdominis plane block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Saadawi
- St. Mary's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, McGill University, 3830 Ave Lacombe, Montreal H3T-1M5, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sebastián Layera
- Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Chile, Office B222 second floor, sector B, 999 Santos Dumont, Independencia, Santiago 8380456, Chile
| | - Julián Aliste
- Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Chile, Office B222 second floor, sector B, 999 Santos Dumont, Independencia, Santiago 8380456, Chile
| | - Daniela Bravo
- Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Chile, Office B222 second floor, sector B, 999 Santos Dumont, Independencia, Santiago 8380456, Chile
| | - Prangmalee Leurcharusmee
- Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawarorot Street, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - De Q Tran
- St. Mary's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, McGill University, 3830 Ave Lacombe, Montreal H3T-1M5, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ha B, Usman AA, Augoustides JG. Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Identifying Opportunities for Further Improvement in the Quality of Postoperative Patient Recovery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:3231-3233. [PMID: 32950344 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bao Ha
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Asad Ali Usman
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John G Augoustides
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|