The role of the liposomal anthracyclines and other systemic therapies in the management of advanced breast cancer

Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Following Treatment Progression via CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Literature Review

Endocrine therapy (ET) with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is currently the first-line standard treatment for most patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic or advanced breast cancer. However, the majority of tumors response to and eventually develop resistance to CDK4/6is. The mechanisms of resistance are poorly understood, and the optimal postprogression treatment regimens and their sequences continue to evolve in the rapidly changing treatment landscape. In this review, we generally summarize the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6is and ET, and describe the findings from clinical trials using small molecule inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy, providing insights into how these novel strategies may reverse treatment resistance, and discussing how some have not translated into clinical benefit. Finally, we provide rational treatment strategies based on the current emerging evidence.

A real-world analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for liposomal and conventional doxorubicins

The clinical application of conventional doxorubicin (CDOX) was constrained by its side effects. Liposomal doxorubicin was developed to mitigate these limitations, showing improved toxicity profiles. However, the adverse events associated with liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX have not yet been comprehensively evaluated in clinical settings. The FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected to analyze the adverse events of liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX. Disproportionate analysis and Bayesian analysis were employed to quantify this association. Our analysis incorporated 68,803 adverse event reports related to Doxil/Caelyx, Myocet and CDOX. The relative odds ratios (RORs, 95%CI) for febrile neutropenia associated with CDOX, Doxil/Caelyx, and Myocet were 42.45 (41.44; 43.48), 17.53 (16.02; 19.20), and 34.68 (26.63; 45.15) respectively. For cardiotoxicity, they were 38.87(36.41;41.49), 17.96 (14.10; 22.86), and 37.36 (19.34; 72.17). For Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE), the RORs were 6.16 (5.69; 6.68), 36.13 (32.60; 40.06), and 19.69 (11.59; 33.44). Regarding onset time, significant differences adverse events including neutropenia, PPE, pneumonia and malignant neoplasm progression. This study indicates that clinical monitoring for symptoms of cardiotoxicity of CDOX and Myocet, and PPE and interstitial lung disease of Doxil should be performed. Additionally, the onset time of febrile neutropenia, malignant neoplasm progression, and pneumonia associated with Doxil and Myocet merits particular attention. Continuous surveillance, risk evaluations, and additional comparative studies between liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX were recommended.

Industrialization’s eye view on theranostic nanomedicine

The emergence of nanomedicines (NMs) in the healthcare industry will bring about groundbreaking improvements to the current therapeutic and diagnostic scenario. However, only a few NMs have been developed into clinical applications due to a lack of regulatory experience with them. In this article, we introduce the types of NM that have the potential for clinical translation, including theranostics, multistep NMs, multitherapy NMs, and nanoclusters. We then present the clinical translational challenges associated with NM from the pharmaceutical industry’s perspective, such as NMs’ intrinsic physiochemical properties, safety, scale-up, lack of regulatory experience and standard characterization methods, and cost-effectiveness compared with their traditional counterparts. Overall, NMs face a difficult task to overcome these challenges for their transition from bench to clinical use.

New challenges in the use of nanomedicine in cancer therapy

Nanomedicines are applied as alternative treatments for anticancer agents. For the treatment of cancer, due to the small size in nanometers (nm), specific site targeting can be achieved with the use of nanomedicines, increasing their bioavailability and conferring fewer toxic side effects. Additionally, the use of minute amounts of drugs can lead to cost savings. In addition, nanotechnology is effectively applied in the preparation of such drugs as they are in nm sizes, considered one of the earliest cutoff values for the production of products utilized in nanotechnology. Early concepts described gold nanoshells as one of the successful therapies for cancer and associated diseases where the benefits of nanomedicine include effective active or passive targeting. Common medicines are degraded at a higher rate, whereas the degradation of macromolecules is time-consuming. All of the discussed properties are responsible for executing the physiological behaviors occurring at the following scale, depending on the geometry. Finally, large nanomaterials based on organic, lipid, inorganic, protein, and synthetic polymers have also been utilized to develop novel cancer cures.

Advances in Therapy for Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Who Have Experienced Progression After Treatment with CDK4/6 Inhibitors

Approximately 70% of breast cancer (BC) cases are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have acted as star drugs for reversing endocrine therapy (ET) resistance and improving the prognosis of patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) since they were initially approved. However, progression eventually occurs. In this review, we summarize the recent treatment strategies post CDK4/6 inhibitors: 1) CDK4/6 inhibitors plus exemestane and everolimus; 2) phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor alpelisib plus fulvestrant for patients with PIK3CA mutation; 3) poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for patients with germline PALB2 mutations, somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, or germline BRCA1/2 mutations; 4) exemestane and everolimus; and (5) chemotherapy. These strategies are all supported by evidence from clinical trials and retrospective studies. We also describe potential future treatment strategies post CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) directed antibody–drug conjugate, cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) inhibitors, and B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors.

Quantification of Cellular Drug Biodistribution Addresses Challenges in Evaluating in vitro and in vivo Encapsulated Drug Delivery

Nanoencapsulated drug delivery to solid tumors is a promising approach to overcome pharmacokinetic limitations of therapeutic drugs. However, encapsulation leads to complex drug biodistribution and delivery making analysis of delivery efficacy challenging. As proxies, nanocarrier accumulation or total tumor drug uptake in the tumor are used to evaluate delivery. Yet, these measurements fail to assess delivery of active, released drug to the target, and thus it commonly remains unknown if drug-target occupancy has been achieved. Here, we develop an approach to evaluate the delivery of encapsulated drug to the target, where residual drug target vacancy is measured using a fluorescent drug analog. In vitro measurements reveal that burst release governs drug delivery independent of nanoparticle uptake, and highlight limitations of evaluating nanoencapsulated drug delivery in these models. In vivo, however, our approach captures successful nanoencapsulated delivery, finding that tumor stromal cells drive nanoparticle accumulation and mediate drug delivery to adjacent cancer cells. These results, and generalizable approach, provide a critical advance to evaluate delivery of encapsulated drug to the drug target - the central objective of nanotherapeutics.

Nanotherapeutics: An insight into healthcare and multi-dimensional applications in medical sector of the modern world

In recent years nanotechnology has revolutionized the healthcare strategies and envisioned to have a tremendous impact to offer better health facilities. In this context, medical nanotechnology involves design, fabrication, regulation, and application of therapeutic drugs and devices having a size in nano-range (1-100 nm). Owing to the revolutionary implications in drug delivery and gene therapy, nanotherapeutics has gained increasing research interest in the current medical sector of the modern world. The areas which anticipate benefits from nano-based drug delivery systems are cancer, diabetes, infectious diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, blood disorders and orthopedic problems. The development of nanotherapeutics with multi-functionalities has considerable potential to fill the lacunae existing in the present therapeutic domain. Nanomedicines in the field of cancer management have enhanced permeability and retention of drugs thereby effectively targeting the affected tissues. Polymeric conjugates of asparaginase, polymeric micelles of paclitaxel have been recmended for various types of cancer treatment .The advancement of nano therapeutics and diagnostics can provide the improved effectiveness of the drug with less or no toxicity concerns. Similarly, diagnostic imaging is having potential future applications with newer imaging elements at nano level. The newly emerging field of nanorobotics can provide new directions in the field of healthcare. In this article, an attempt has been made to highlight the novel nanotherapeutic potentialities of polymeric nanoparticles, nanoemulsion, solid lipid nanoparticle, nanostructured lipid carriers, dendrimers, nanocapsules and nanosponges based approaches. The useful applications of these nano-medicines in the field of cancer, nutrition, and health have been discussed in details. Regulatory and safety concerns along with the commercial status of nanosystems have also been presented. In summary, a successful translation of emerging nanotherapeutics into commercial products may lead to an expansion of biomedical science. Towards the end of the review, future perspectives of this important field have been introduced briefly.

Lipodox® (generic doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection): in vivo efficacy and bioequivalence versus Caelyx® (doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection) in human mammary carcinoma (MX-1) xenograft and syngeneic fibrosarcoma (WEHI 164) mouse models

Background

Doxorubicin (DXR) hydrochloride (HCl) liposome injection is an important part of the treatment armamentarium for a number of cancers. With growing needs for affordable and effective anticancer treatments, the development of generics is becoming increasingly important to facilitate patient access to vital medications. We conducted studies in relevant mouse models of cancer to compare the preclinical antitumour efficacy and plasma pharmacokinetic profile of a proposed generic DXR HCl liposome injection developed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (SPIL DXR HCl liposome injection) with Caelyx® (reference DXR HCl liposome injection).

Methods

Syngeneic fibrosarcoma (WEHI 164)-bearing BALB/c mice and athymic nude mice transplanted with MX-1 human mammary carcinoma xenografts were treated with SPIL DXR HCl liposome injection, reference DXR HCl liposome injection or placebo, to compare tumour volume, antitumour activity (percentage test/control [%T/C] ratio, tumour regression, and specific tumour growth delay) and toxicity (survival and weight changes) in response to treatment. The pharmacokinetic profile of the SPIL and reference product was also studied in syngeneic fibrosarcoma-bearing mice.

Results

Treatment with either SPIL or reference DXR HCl liposome injection resulted in significant reduction in tumour volume from baseline in both models at all doses tested. High antitumour activity (%T/C ≤ 10) was seen from Day 21 and Day 14 onwards in SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injection–treated syngeneic fibrosarcoma-bearing mice, respectively, at 9 mg/kg. Moderate antitumour activity (%T/C ≤ 20) was seen from Day 17 and Day 24 onwards in SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injection–treated MX-1-bearing mice, respectively, at 6 mg/kg. No significant differences in tumour volume and %T/C were observed between SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injection–treated groups at any dose (p ≥ 0.05). Toxicity profiles were considered to be generally comparable. Evaluation of test/reference (A/B) ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for peak serum concentration (C_max) and area under the curve (AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞) demonstrated bioequivalence of SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections.

Conclusions

Establishing similarity is of critical importance during the development of generic treatments. SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections were shown to be comparable with regards to antitumour activity, toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

Challenges and strategies in anti-cancer nanomedicine development: An industry perspective

Successfully translating anti-cancer nanomedicines from pre-clinical proof of concept to demonstration of therapeutic value in the clinic is challenging. Having made significant advances with drug delivery technologies, we must learn from other areas of oncology drug development, where patient stratification and target-driven design have improved patient outcomes. We should evolve our nanomedicine development strategies to build the patient and disease into the line of sight from the outset. The success of small molecule targeted therapies has been significantly improved by employing a specific decision-making framework, such as AstraZeneca's 5R principle: right target/efficacy, right tissue/exposure, right safety, right patient, and right commercial potential. With appropriate investment and collaboration to generate a platform of evidence supporting the end clinical application, a similar framework can be established for enhancing nanomedicine translation and performance. Building informative data packages to answer these questions requires the following: (I) an improved understanding of the heterogeneity of clinical cancers and of the biological factors influencing the behaviour of nanomedicines in patient tumours; (II) a transition from formulation-driven research to disease-driven development; (III) the implementation of more relevant animal models and testing protocols; and (IV) the pre-selection of the patients most likely to respond to nanomedicine therapies. These challenges must be overcome to improve (the cost-effectiveness of) nanomedicine development and translation, and they are key to establishing superior therapies for patients.

Liposomes as multicompartmental carriers for multidrug delivery in anticancer chemotherapy

A new PEGylated liposomal formulation containing both gemcitabine (GEM) and paclitaxel (PTX) was investigated in order to realize an innovative multidrug carrier (MDC) to test on human cancer cells. The MDC in question was realized by the liposome extrusion method. Photocorrelation spectroscopy was used for the physicochemical characterization of the vesicular carriers. In vitro cytotoxicity was studied through MTT testing. The contemporary presence of the two antitumoral compounds induced no destabilization phenomena in the liposomal structure. The extrusion method provided vesicles with mean sizes of ∼100 nm and a zeta-potential of ∼ -10 mV. The liposomal MDC showed a high drug loading capacity (∼90% and ∼80% for GEM and PTX, respectively) as well as a controlled release of the active compounds over a 24-h period. Cell viability testing on Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 human breast cancer cells evidenced the MDC as having a stronger cytotoxic effect with respect to the active compounds tested in free and liposomal formulations, both as single molecules and in association. Flow cytometry furnished evidence of the synergistic in vitro antitumoral action between the GEM and PTX co-encapsulated the liposomal MDC. This formulation may offer even more advantages in in vivo testing in terms of drug pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, and antitumoral efficacy for the treatment of breast cancer, as compared to past formulations.

A PEGylation-Free Biomimetic Porphyrin Nanoplatform for Personalized Cancer Theranostics

PEGylation (PEG) is the most commonly adopted strategy to prolong nanoparticles' vascular circulation by mitigating the reticuloendothelial system uptake. However, there remain many concerns in regards to its immunogenicity, targeting efficiency, etc., which inspires pursuit of alternate, non-PEGylated systems. We introduced here a PEG-free, porphyrin-based ultrasmall nanostructure mimicking nature lipoproteins, termed PLP, that integrates multiple imaging and therapeutic functionalities, including positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy (PDT). With an engineered lipoprotein-mimicking structure, PLP is highly stable in the blood circulation, resulting in favorable pharmacokinetics and biodistribution without the need of PEG. The prompt tumor intracellular trafficking of PLP allows for rapid nanostructure dissociation upon tumor accumulation to release monomeric porphyrins to efficiently generate fluorescence and photodynamic reactivity, which are highly silenced in intact PLP, thus providing an activatable mechanism for low-background NIR fluorescence imaging and tumor-selective PDT. Its intrinsic copper-64 labeling feature allows for noninvasive PET imaging of PLP delivery and quantitative assessment of drug distribution. Using a clinically relevant glioblastoma multiforme model, we demonstrated that PLP enabled accurate delineation of tumor from surrounding healthy brain at size less than 1 mm, exhibiting the potential for intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery and tumor-selective PDT. Furthermore, we demonstrated the general applicability of PLP for sensitive and accurate detection of primary and metastatic tumors in other clinically relevant animal models. Therefore, PLP offers a biomimetic theranostic nanoplatform for pretreatment stratification using PET and NIR fluorescence imaging and for further customized cancer management via imaging-guided surgery, PDT, or/and potential chemotherapy.

Cardiovascular toxicities from systemic breast cancer therapy

Cardiovascular toxicity is unfortunately a potential short- or long-term sequela of breast cancer therapy. Both conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as anthracyclines and newer targeted agents such as trastuzumab can cause varying degrees of cardiac dysfunction. Type I cardiac toxicity is dose-dependent and irreversible, whereas Type II is not dose-dependent and is generally reversible with cessation of the drug. In this review, we discuss what is currently known about the cardiovascular effects of systemic breast cancer treatments, with a focus on the putative mechanisms of toxicity, the role of biomarkers, and potential methods of preventing and minimizing cardiovascular complications.

Nab-paclitaxel for breast cancer: a new formulation with an improved safety profile and greater efficacy

Taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, are among the most effective agents used to treat breast cancer. Nab-paclitaxel (ABI-007, Abraxane) is paclitaxel encapsulated in albumin. This differs from the more conventional formulation which uses cremophor to increase the solubility of paclitaxel (CrEL-paclitaxel). In a randomized trial that formed the basis of its regulatory approval in the USA, 3-weekly nab-paclitaxel induced a higher response rate and longer time to progression than CrEL-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Except for grade 3 sensory neuropathy, nab-paclitaxel was also safer. An interim analysis from a more recent randomized Phase II trial suggests that weekly nab-paclitaxel is more effective and safer than either 3-weekly nab-paclitaxel or 3-weekly docetaxel. The superior efficacy of nab-paclitaxel is presumably due to the improved safety profile, which allows for the administration of higher doses, a greater proportion of which actually reaches the tumor. Observations on the development of nab-paclitaxel have important implications for our understanding of dose response in the use of cytotoxic drugs to treat all forms of cancer. Although it is not yet clear whether nab-paclitaxel can be routinely substituted for CrEL-paclitaxel or docetaxel in breast cancer treatment regimens, it seems highly likely that this will occur within the next 5 years.

First-line chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclofosfamide in metastatic breast cancer: a case report of early and prolonged response

The treatment choice for metastatic breast cancer should consider the appropriate balance between efficacy and toxicity of the therapy. We discuss a clinical case with an early response and prolonged to liposomal anthracyclines-based chemotherapy, without cardiotoxicity, enhancing the evidence of safety of liposomal formulation to prevent heart damage. Moreover, the case seems to be of interest for the role of 18F-FDG-PET in clinical response assessment: an early decrease of the standardized uptake value value, even before conventional imaging evaluation, is highly predictive for prolonged clinical response.

Lipid-based nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and therapy

Today, researchers are constantly developing new nanomaterials, nanodevices, and nanoparticles to meet unmet needs in the delivery of therapeutic agents and imaging agents for cancer therapy and diagnosis, respectively. Of particular interest here are lipid-based nanoparticles (LNPs) that are genuine particles (approximately 100 nm in dimension) assembled from varieties of lipid and other chemical components that act collectively to overcome biological barriers (biobarriers), in order for LNPs to preferentially accumulate in or around disease-target cells for the functional delivery of therapeutic agents for treatment or of imaging agents for diagnosis. The capabilities of these LNPs will clearly vary depending on functional requirements, but the nanoscale allows for an impressive level of diversity in capabilities to enable corresponding LNPs to address an equally diverse range of functional requirements. Accordingly, LNPs should be considered appropriate vehicles to provide an integrated, personalized approach to cancer diagnosis and therapy in future cancer disease management.

Chemotherapy in Patients with Anthracycline- and Taxane-Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Overview

Anthracyclines and taxanes are cytotoxic agents that are commonly used for the treatment of breast cancer, including in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic setting. Each drug class of is associated with cumulative and potentially irreversible toxicity, including cardiomyopathy (anthracyclines) and neuropathy (taxanes). This may either limit the duration of therapy for advanced disease, or prevent retreatment for recurrence if previously used as component of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Several classes of cytotoxic agents have been evaluated in patients with anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC), including other antitubulins (vinorelbine, ixabepilone, eribulin), antimetabolites (capecitabine, gemcitabine), topoisomerase I inhibitors (irinotecan), platinum analogues (cisplatin, carboplatin), and liposomal doxorubicin preparations. No trials have shown an overall survival advantage for combination chemotherapy in this setting, indicating that single cytotoxic agents should usually be used, expect perhaps in patients with rapidly progressive disease and/or high tumor burden.

Gemcitabine-loaded liposomes: rationale, potentialities and future perspectives

This review describes the strategies used in recent years to improve the biopharmaceutical properties of gemcitabine, a nucleoside analog deoxycytidine antimetabolite characterized by activity against many kinds of tumors, by means of liposomal devices. The main limitation of using this active compound is the rapid inactivation of deoxycytidine deaminase following administration in vivo. Consequently, different strategies based on its encapsulation/complexation in innovative vesicular colloidal carriers have been investigated, with interesting results in terms of increased pharmacological activity, plasma half-life, and tumor localization, in addition to decreased side effects. This review focuses on the specific approaches used, based on the encapsulation of gemcitabine in liposomes, with particular attention to the results obtained during the last 5 years. These approaches represent a valid starting point in the attempt to obtain a novel, commercializable drug formulation as already achieved for liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil^®, Caelyx^®).

Breast cancer treatment and adverse cardiac events: what are the molecular mechanisms?

Cardiotoxicity associated with breast cancer treatment is an important concern in the oncology clinic. Different types of anti-cancer therapies have recorded high rates of cardiac dysfunction in treated patients. Cardiac dysfunction linked to anthracyclines--one of the most common conventional chemotherapies--has extensively been described and several mechanisms have been proposed, although their mode of action is not fully understood even in cancer cells. The mediation of cardiac damage by reactive oxygen species stress is a recent hypothesis that has attracted a lot of interest, since it might explain the tissue-specific toxic effects of anthracyclines in the heart. Regarding molecular targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2+ tumours (e.g., trastuzumab, lapatinib), it is the blockage of survival pathways required for a normal heart development and function that seems to lead to cardiac pathology. Both types of breast cancer treatment appear to trigger cardiotoxicity synergically, being patients under adjuvant therapy closely monitored. Given the complex nature of heart failure and of the pathways altered by anti-cancer drugs, global gene expression regulation is key in the heart disease process. MicroRNAs have been demonstrated to be small molecules with big roles as essential gene expression modulators. The great potential of microRNAs as biomarkers in the cardio-oncology field needs to be further explored before new microRNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic tools can be developed.

Synthesis and biological characterization of protease-activated prodrugs of doxazolidine

Doxazolidine (doxaz) is a new anthracycline anticancer agent. While structurally similar to doxorubicin (dox), doxaz acts via a distinct mechanism to selectively enhance anticancer activity over cardiotoxicity, the most significant clinical impediment to successful anthracycline treatment. Here, we describe the synthesis and characterization of a prodrug platform designed for doxaz release mediated by secreted proteolytic activity, a common association with invasiveness and poor prognosis in cancer patients. GaFK-Doxaz is hydrolyzable by the proteases plasmin and cathepsin B, both strongly linked with cancer progression, as well as trypsin. We demonstrate that activation of GaFK-Doxaz releases highly potent doxaz that powerfully inhibits the growth of a wide variety of cancer cells (average IC(50) of 8 nM). GaFK-Doxaz is stable in human plasma and is poorly membrane permeable, thereby limiting activation to locally secreted proteolytic activity and reducing the likelihood of severe side effects.

Gemcitabine and tamoxifen-loaded liposomes as multidrug carriers for the treatment of breast cancer diseases

The effects of a lipid composition on the physico-chemical and technological properties of a multidrug carrier (MDC) containing both gemcitabine (GEM) and tamoxifen (TMX), as well as its in vitro antitumoral activity on different breast cancer cell lines, were investigated. In particular, the following three different liposomal formulations were prepared: DPPC/Chol/DSPE-mPEG2000 (6:3:1 molar ratio, formulation A), DPPC/Chol/DOTAP (6:3:1 molar ratio, formulation B) and DPPC/Chol/DPPG (6:3:1 molar ratio, formulation C). The colloidal systems were obtained by the TLE technique and the extrusion process allowed us to obtain vesicles having mean sizes of 150-200 nm, while the surface charges varied between 50 mV and -30 mV. Formulation A showed the best encapsulation efficiency between the two compounds and the presence of TMX influenced the release profile of GEM (hydrophilic compound) as a consequence of its effect on the fluidity of the bilayer. An MDC of formulation A was used to effectuate the in vitro cytotoxicity experiments (MTT-test) on MCF-7 and T47D cells. The liposomal MDC provided the best results with respect to the single drug tested in the free form or entrapped in the same liposomal formulation. The CLSM experiments showed a great degree of cell interaction of liposomal MDC after just 6h.

Sulfosalicylate mediates improved vinorelbine loading into LUVs and antineoplastic effects

Liposomal vinorelbine formulation is desirable, as it might improve the therapeutic activity of vinorelbine. However, because of its lipophilic and membrane-permeable properties, vinorelbine is hard to be formulated into liposomes using conventional drug-loading technologies. To improve vinorelbine retention, ammonium salts of several anionic agents were employed to prepare liposomal vinorelbine formulations. It was found that 5-sulfosalicylate (5ssa) could form stable complexes with vinorelbine and stabilize entrapped vinorelbine. The resultant vesicles had an in vitro release t(1/2) of ~12.49 hours in NH(3)-containing media, which is longer than those of sulfate and phytate vesicles (~0.57 hours). The circulation half-life of vinorelbine after the injection of 5ssa vesicles into normal mice was ~13.01 hours, accounting for ~2-fold increase relative to that of sulfate vesicles. Improved drug retention correlated with enhanced antitumor efficacy. In the RM-1/c57 model, 5ssa vesicles were more efficacious than sulfate vesicles (P < 0.05). In RM-1/BDF1 and Lewis lung cancer/c57 models, antitumor efficacy was also considerably improved after vinorelbine encapsulation into 5ssa vesicles. For instance, in the RM/BDF1 model, liposomal vinorelbine was at least 4-fold more therapeutically active than free vinorelbine. Our results demonstrated that 5ssa could stabilize vinorelbine relative to other anions, resulting in the formulation with improved drug retention and efficacy. Improved vinorelbine retention might be associated with the formation of insoluble precipitate, which could be proved by precipitation study and decreased drug-release rate at a high D/L ratio.

Targeting nanoparticles to cancer

Nanotechnology applications in medicine, termed as nanomedicine, have introduced a number of nanoparticles of variable chemistry and architecture for cancer imaging and treatment. Nanotechnology involves engineering multifunctional devices with dimensions at the nanoscale, similar dimensions as those of large biological vesicles or molecules in our body. These devices typically have features just tens to hundred nanometers across and they can carry one or two detection signals and/or therapeutic cargo(s). One unique class of nanoparticles is designed to do both, providing this way the theragnostic nanoparticles (therapy and diagnosis). Being inspired by physiologically existing nanomachines, nanoparticles are designed to safely reach their target and specifically release their cargo at the site of the disease, this way increasing the drug's tissue bioavailability. Nanoparticles have the advantage of targeting cancer by simply being accumulated and entrapped in tumours (passive targeting). The phenomenon is called the enhanced permeation and retention effect, caused by leaky angiogenetic vessels and poor lymphatic drainage and has been used to explain why macromolecules and nanoparticles are found at higher ratios in tumours compared to normal tissues. Although accumulation in tumours is observed cell uptake and intracellular drug release have been questioned. Polyethyleneglycol (PEG) is used to protect the nanoparticles from the Reticulo-Endothelial System (RES), however, it prevents cell uptake and the required intracellular drug release. Grafting biorecognition molecules (ligands) onto the nanoparticles refers to active targeting and aims to increase specific cell uptake. Nanoparticles bearing these ligands are recognised by cell surface receptors and this leads to receptor-mediated endocytosis. Several materials are suggested for the design of nanoparticles for cancer. Polymers, linear and dendrimers, are associated with the drug in a covalent or non-covalent way and have been used with or without a targeting ligand. Stealth liposomes are suggested to carry the drug in the aqueous core, and they are usually decorated by recognition molecules, being widely studied and applied. Inorganic nanoparticles such as gold and iron oxide are usually coupled to the drug, PEG and the targeting ligand. It appears that the PEG coating and ligand decoration are common constituents in most types of nanoparticles for cancer. There are several examples of successful cancer diagnostic and therapeutic nanoparticles and many of them have rapidly moved to clinical trials. Nevertheless there is still a room for optimisation in the area of the nanoparticle kinetics such as improving their plasma circulation and tumour bioavailability and understanding the effect of targeting ligands on their efficiency to treat cancer. The need to develop novel and efficient ligands has never been greater, and the use of proper conjugation chemistry is mandatory.

Current trends in liposome research

Among the several drug delivery systems, liposomes--phospholipid nanosized vesicles with a bilayered membrane structure--have drawn a lot of interest as advanced and versatile pharmaceutical carriers for both low and high molecular weight pharmaceuticals. At present, liposomal formulations span multiple areas, from clinical application of the liposomal drugs to the development of various multifunctional liposomal systems to be used in therapy and diagnostics. This chapter provides a brief overview of various liposomal products currently under development at experimental and preclinical level.

Optimal treatment strategies in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is unfortunately still considered incurable; treatment aims to prolong progression-free and overall survival, relieve disease symptoms, and maintain quality of life. Treatment can include endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, and/or targeted therapy; which is used depends on the characteristics of the disease [e.g., hormone receptor status, disease site(s), and response to previous treatment] and the patient (age, comorbidity, and personal preferences). For most patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumors, the first choice of treatment is further endocrine therapy, but endocrine resistance is a common problem in advanced disease. Several novel anticancer agents have been developed with the aim of overcoming endocrine resistance, many of which target intracellular signaling pathways implicated in disease progression or resistance. Among these, inhibitors of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases and of mammalian target of rapamycin have shown the most promise in clinical trials. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of MBC treatment in most women. Important considerations when choosing chemotherapy include the choice of agents, and whether to use single-agent or combination therapy. Anthracyclines are one of the most active cytotoxic agents currently used for the treatment of breast cancer, and for many women, further anthracycline therapy at progression or relapse would be the preferred option. However, lifetime exposure to anthracyclines is limited by cumulative cardiotoxicity, which often prevents rechallenge in later lines of therapy. Newer anthracycline formulations have been developed with lower cardiotoxicity than the conventional anthracycline doxorubicin, but these agents still impair cardiac function, and have maximum recommended lifetime doses. Recently, the concomitant use of cardioprotective agents, such as dexrazoxane, has emerged as an effective approach to reducing the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines, thus permitting retreatment. Bisphosphonates, which are not associated with the acute toxicities of cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, are the established standard of care for patients with metastatic bone disease, and have greatly improved outcomes over the last decade. The search is ongoing for novel agents that will, hopefully, bring a cure closer to reality.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study

This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71 recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range=37-79), and 31 patients (43.7%) were > or =65 years old. Patients received PLD, 25 mg m(-2), day 1, followed by GEM, 800 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, q21. Response was evaluable in 64 cases. Eight complete (12.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.6%) were registered, with an overall response rate of 39.1%. Thirty patients (46.9%) experienced stable disease, with an overall clinical benefit of 85.9%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The rate of 1- and 2-year OS was 79 and 61%, respectively. A total of 443 courses were evaluable for toxicity: grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia affected 14 patients (20.3%) and 3 patients (4.3%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was documented in five cases (7.2%) and one case (1.4%), whereas grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred in six cases (8.7%) and two cases (2.9%), respectively. Grade 2 cardiac toxicity was observed in only one case. Interestingly enough, there was no difference in the percentage and severity of either haematological or non-haematological toxicity according to the age of the patients (<65 vs > or =65 years). We confirmed in a large, very homogenous study sample of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients the efficacy and safety of PLD/GEM combination, providing response rates, median TTP and OS values comparable with those achieved with more toxic combinations.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the (6-Maleimidocaproyl)Hydrazone Derivative of Doxorubicin

PURPOSE

The (6-maleimidocaproyl)hydrazone derivative of doxorubicin (DOXO-EMCH) is an albumin-binding prodrug of doxorubicin with acid-sensitive properties that shows superior antitumor efficacy in murine tumor models and a favorable toxicity profile in mice, rats, and dogs compared with doxorubicin. The purpose of the phase I study was to characterize the toxicity profile of DOXO-EMCH, establish a recommended dose for phase II studies, and assess potential anticancer activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A starting dose of 20 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalents was chosen. Forty-one patients with advanced cancer disease were treated with an i.v. infusion of DOXO-EMCH once every 3 weeks at a dose level of 20 to 340 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalents.

RESULTS

Treatment with DOXO-EMCH was well tolerated up to 200 mg/m2 without manifestation of drug-related side effects. Myelosuppression (grade 1-2) and mucositis (grade 1-2) were the predominant adverse effects at dose levels of 260 mg/m2 and myelosuppression (grade 1-3) as well as mucositis (grade 1-3) were dose limiting at 340 mg/m2. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Of 30 of 41 evaluable patients, 12 patients (40%) had progressive disease, 15 patients (57%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10%) had a partial remission.

CONCLUSIONS

DOXO-EMCH showed a good safety profile and was able to induce tumor regressions in tumor types known to be anthracycline-sensitive tumors, such as breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, and sarcoma. The recommended doxorubicin equivalent dose for phase II studies is 260 mg/m2.

Effects of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin on the protein C anticoagulant pathway

Although chemotherapy treatment is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, the pathogenic mechanisms for the thrombogenic effect of chemotherapeutic drugs are poorly understood. We hypothesize that exposure of vascular endothelial cells to chemotherapeutic agents results in the loss of a thromboresistant phenotype. In this study, we examined the effects of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin on the endothelium-based protein C anticoagulant pathway. The endothelial cell protein C receptor (EPCR) and thrombomodulin are two endothelial cell surface receptors required for the conversion of zymogen protein C to the anticoagulant enzyme activated protein C. Exposure of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) to doxorubicin resulted in a dose- and time-dependent decrease in cell surface EPCR levels. This decrease occurred as a result of receptor shedding as well as from a down-regulation in EPCR mRNA levels. In contrast, doxorubicin treatment of HUVECs resulted in a dose- and time-dependent increase in cell surface thrombomodulin attributed to an up-regulation of thrombomodulin mRNA levels. The net effect of the doxorubicin-induced changes in EPCR and thrombomodulin levels was a decrease in the capacity of HUVECs to convert protein C to activated protein C. Preliminary studies suggest that doxorubicin free radical metabolites mediate the doxorubicin-induced changes in EPCR expression but not those of thrombomodulin expression. In summary, these results suggest that doxorubicin alters the hemostatic balance of endothelial cells by down-regulating the endothelium-based protein C anticoagulant pathway.

DOXO-EMCH (INNO-206): the first albumin-binding prodrug of doxorubicin to enter clinical trials

The (6-maleimidocaproyl)hydrazone derivative of doxorubicin (DOXO-EMCH) is an albumin-binding prodrug of doxorubicin with acid-sensitive properties that demonstrates superior antitumor efficacy in murine tumor models and a favorable toxicity profile in mice, rats and dogs, including significantly reduced cardiotoxicity. After intravenous administration, DOXO-EMCH binds rapidly to the Cys-34 position of circulating albumin and accumulates in solid tumors due to passive targeting. In a clinical Phase I study, the dose of doxorubicin could be increased by a factor of 4.5-340 mg/m(2) when 75 mg/m(2) of free doxorubicin is considered to be the dose that can be administered as a single agent concomitant with the typical spectrum of side effects (i.e., myelotoxicity and mucositis). DOXO-EMCH was able to induce tumor regressions in anthracycline-sensitive tumors (i.e., breast cancer, small cell lung cancer and sarcoma). Phase II studies will be initiated at the beginning of 2007.

Liposomal doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide and antiretroviral therapy for patients with AIDS-related lymphoma: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To evaluate in a pilot study the safety and efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (LACE) when combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART) in patients with AIDS-related lymphoma (ARL). The impact of HIV viral control on therapy and survival was also assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 2005, 40 patients at Virginia Mason Medical Center were diagnosed with ARL. Twelve received LACE every 28 days. All patients received intrathecal chemoprophylaxis, ART, and G-CSF.

RESULTS

The median patient CD4+ count was 190 cells/microl (range, 20-510 cells/microl), and the median HIV viral load (VL) was 61,613 copies/ml (range, <50-500,000 copies/ml). Seven patients (58%) had an International Prognostic Index score of 3 or 4. Six patients (50%) were ART-naïve, five were viremic despite ART, and one had an undetectable HIV-1 VL. Nine patients (75%) achieved a complete response (CR), and median overall survival was 107 months. At a median follow-up of 46 months, the recurrence-free survival rate was 50%. Two patients died from relapsed/refractory ARL and one patient achieved a CR with salvage therapy. One CR patient died from complications of pneumonia, and another CR patient died from uncertain causes 5 years after treatment. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 23 of 61 (38%) chemotherapy cycles. Hospitalization was required after 5% of treatment cycles due to neutropenic fever.

CONCLUSION

LACE is an effective and tolerable treatment for ARL. HIV viral control can be maintained in the majority of patients during and after completion of LACE.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of cancers of the breast and ovary

Peglyated liposomal doxorubicin was developed to maintain or enhance the demonstrated antineoplastic effects of doxorubicin, while improving the toxicity profile associated with this important cytotoxic agent. Accumulating clinical data have confirmed the activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in cancers of the breast and ovary. Furthermore, Phase II and III trial experience has revealed that the drug produces objective responses comparable in rate and duration to doxorubicin and other single agents employed in metastatic breast cancer. In recurrent and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has assumed an important role in routine patient management.

Second-line treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women and, currently, there is no standard of care for the treatment of metastatic disease. Treatment options are based on a number of tumor- and patient-related factors. This review explores some of these options, including the use of hormonal manipulation in the treatment of hormone-positive disease, current chemotherapy options and the use of targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab.

Current strategies for the development of peptide-based anti-cancer therapeutics

The completion of the human genome sequence and the development of new techniques, which allow the visualisation of comprehensive gene expression patterns, has led to the identification of a large number of gene products differentially expressed in tumours and corresponding normal tissues. The task at hand is the sorting of these genes into correlative and causative ones. Correlative genes are merely changed as a consequence of transformation and have no decisive effects upon transformation. In contrast, causative genes play a direct role in the process of cellular transformation and the maintenance of the transformed state, which can be exploited for therapeutic purposes. Oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes are prime targets for the development of new inhibitors and gene therapeutic strategies. However, many target oncogene products do not exhibit enzymatic activity that can be inhibited by conventional small molecular weight compounds. They exert their functions through regulated protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions and might require other compounds for efficient interference with such functions. Peptides are emerging as a novel class of drugs for cancer therapy, which could fulfil these tasks. Peptide therapy aims at the specific inhibition of inappropriately activated oncogenes. This review will focus on the selection procedures, which can be employed to identify useful peptides for the treatment of cancer. Before peptide-based therapeutics can become useful, it will be necessary to increase their stability by modifications or the use of scaffolds. Additionally, various delivery methods including liposomes and particularly the use of protein transduction domains (PTDs) have to be explored. These strategies will yield highly specific and more effective peptides and improve the potential of peptide-based anti-cancer therapeutics.

Guidelines for the management of the older cancer patient

Evaluation of: Balducci L, Cohen HJ, Enstrom PF et al.: Senior adult oncology clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Center Netw. 3, 572–590 (2005). The management of older cancer patients with cytotoxic chemotherapy involves a new balance of benefits and risks, given the limited life expectancy and increased susceptibility to therapeutic complications of older individuals. The National Cancer Center Network has been issuing guidelines for the management of older cancer patients since 1999. This article reviews the basis of the most recent set of guidelines, issued in 2005. These include: some form of geriatric assessment for individuals aged 70 years and older to estimate their life expectancy and treatment tolerance; adjustment of the first dose of chemotherapy to glomerular filtration rate for individuals aged 65 years and older; prophylactic use of myelopoietic growth factors (e.g., filgrastim or pegfilgrastim) in patients aged 65 years and older treated with moderately toxic chemotherapy (of which cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone is the paradigm); maintainance of hemoglobin levels at approximately 12 gm/dl; and preferential use of drugs of low toxicity (e.g., capecitabine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, weekly taxanes, gemcitabine or navelbine).

Liposomal encapsulated anti-cancer drugs

Among several drug delivery systems, liposomal encapsulated anti-cancer agents represent an advanced and versatile technology. Several formulations of liposomal anthracyclines are approved, e.g. for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (pegylated and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) or AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal daunorubicin). Meanwhile, virtually all anti-cancer drugs have been encapsulated in liposomes using different technologies. This review will summarize preclinical and clinical data of approved and exemplary emerging liposomal anti-cancer agents.