The Relationship of Resiliency to Decision Making and Risk Behaviors of Cancer-Surviving Adolescents

Systematic Review of Substance Use Measurement Tools in Adolescent and Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors

Substance use among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is associated with an increased risk of poor physical and mental health outcomes. For AYA childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), substance use may also increase their likelihood of experiencing late effects. As a result, professional organizations recommend that AYA CCSs be regularly screened for risk behaviors, including substance use. The best methods for assessing these behaviors as part of clinical care for AYA CCSs, however, remain unclear. To begin to address this gap, the purpose of this study was to systematically review written substance use measures that have been used with AYA CCSs and published between 2000 and 2020. A search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL using terms related to substance use and AYA CCSs identified 47 articles representing 20 different written substance use measures that evaluated current substance use (i.e., use of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, prescription medications taken in a manner other than as prescribed, and/or other illicit substances within the 12 months). Measures varied in domains assessed, item formats, and response formats. Results are presented alongside recommendations for selecting screening tools for use with AYA CCS populations in both clinical and research settings.

Substance Use Risk Behaviors and Decision-Making Skills Among Cancer-Surviving Adolescents

The aims of this study were to compare decision making and substance use risk behaviors of a cohort of cancer-surviving adolescents to those of 2 earlier cohorts as well as adolescents in the US general population and to determine the relationship of decision making to substance use risk behaviors. This correlational study used a semistructured interview at the time of the annual clinic visit to obtain data. Teen cancer survivors (N = 76), ages 14-19 years, were recruited from 5 clinics within the United States. Adherence to quality decision-making skills reported by different cancer-surviving adolescent cohorts appears to remain the same over time. However, reported substance use risk behaviors by these teen survivor cohorts have decreased over time. The prevalence rates for lifetime use for the 2004 cohort of teen cancer survivors were 25%, 49%, and 16%, for cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana use, respectively. These rates are somewhat lower than those in the US general population; yet, they are high given the health vulnerability of cancer-surviving adolescents. Poor-quality decision making was significantly associated with higher levels of substance use risk behaviors for these teen cancer survivors. In conjunction with the statistics related to higher health risks in this vulnerable group of teens, these findings support continued efforts in developing interventions for risk behavior counseling.

A substance use decision aid for medically at-risk adolescents: results of a randomized controlled trial for cancer-surviving adolescents

BACKGROUND

Adolescent survivors of childhood cancer engage in risky behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

This study tested a decision aid for cancer-surviving adolescents aimed at difficult decisions related to engaging in substance use behaviors.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial recruited 243 teen survivors at 3 cancer centers. The cognitive-behavioral skills program focused on decision making and substance use within the context of past treatment. Effects at 6 and 12 months were examined for decision making, risk motivation, and substance use behaviors using linear regression models.

RESULTS

The majority of the teen cancer survivors (90%) rated the program as positive. There was an intermediate effect at 6 months for change in risk motivation for low riskers, but this effect was not sustained at 12 months. For quality decision making, there was no significant effect between treatment groups for either time point.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall program effects were modest. Once teen survivors are in the program and learn what quality decision making is, their written reports indicated adjustment in their perception of their decision-making ability; thus, a more diagnostic baseline decision-making measure and a more intensive intervention are needed in the last 6 months. With 2 of 3 teen participants dealing with cognitive difficulties, the data suggest that this type of intervention will continue to be challenging, especially when 90% of their household members and 56% of their close friends model substance use.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This effectiveness trial using late-effects clinics provides recommendations for further program development for medically at-risk adolescents, particularly ones with cognitive difficulties.

Smoking Cessation Interventions and Cessation Rates in the Oncology Population

Objectives

To evaluate tobacco smoking cessation interventions and cessation rates in the oncology population through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources

The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (inception to October 2012) by 3 independent review authors.

Review Methods

Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort (PCs) studies evaluating tobacco smoking cessation interventions with patients assigned to a usual care or an intervention group. The primary outcome measure was smoking cessation rates. Two authors extracted data independently for each study. When applicable, disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Results

The systematic review identified 10 RCTs and 3 PCs. Statistical analysis was conducted using StatsDirect software (Cheshire, UK). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for smoking cessation interventions were calculated in 2 groups based on follow-up duration. The therapeutic interventions included counseling, nicotine replacement therapy, buproprion, and varenicline. Smoking cessation interventions had a pooled odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.909-2.64) for patients in the shorter follow-up group and 1.31 (95% CI, 0.931-1.84) in the longer follow-up group. Smoking cessation interventions in the perioperative period had a pooled odds ratio of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.32-4.07).

Conclusion

Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that tobacco cessation interventions in the oncology population, in both the short-term and long-term follow-up groups, do not significantly affect cessation rates. The perioperative period, though, may represent an important teachable moment with regard to smoking cessation.

Promoting healthy development among survivors of adolescent cancer

Cancer-surviving adolescents face significant health challenges including both physical and psychological late effects as they transition to young adulthood. A cancer diagnosis during adolescence, a time of social independence and increased personal decision making, can cause significant social and emotional struggles that may impair the ability of the adolescent to make health-promoting decisions and avoid risky behaviors such as substance use. This article reports on the little studied experiences of adolescents who have survived cancer with a focus on developing programs and policies that address their health-promotion needs in both community and survivorship clinics.

Correlates of physical activity in young adult survivors of childhood cancers

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To examine correlates of participation in regular physical activities among young adult survivors of childhood cancers.

DESIGN

Descriptive, correlational.

SETTING

Web-based survey.

SAMPLE

117 well-educated, predominately Caucasian survivors of various types of childhood cancers (-X age = 24 years).

METHODS

Participants completed four rating scales, a stages of change measure, and background questions. Logistic regression and graphical methods were used to examine relationships among physical activity correlates and physical activity.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Physical activity stages of change, autonomous motivation, physical activity pros and cons, self-efficacy, and self-reported worries.

FINDINGS

More than 80% of participants reported that they were physically active. Survivors who were autonomously motivated and who perceived fewer cons to being physically active were more likely to report being active than survivors with lower autonomous motivation scores and higher physical activity cons scores. Worries about the present and future moderated the effect of physical activity cons on physical activity. The estimated probabilities of reporting being active for women and men changed as the collective contribution of autonomous motivation, physical activity cons, and worries varied from low to high values.

CONCLUSIONS

Engaging in physical activity willingly and without a sense of pressure (autonomous motivation), perceiving fewer cons to physical activity participation (cognitive appraisal), and worrying about the present and future (affective response) were important correlates of self-reported physical activity beyond the influence of gender.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Interventions that promote autonomous motivation, decrease physical activity cons, and address present and future worries may increase physical activity in young adult cancer survivors and may have a greater impact on women than men.

Smoking rates and the state of smoking interventions for children and adolescents with chronic illness

Engaging in smoking is particularly risky for children and adolescents with chronic illness whose health status is already compromised because of disease- and treatment-related complications. Yet, some of these youngsters smoke at rates at least comparable to those of their healthy peers. To date, few randomized smoking-prevention and cessation trials have been conducted in children with chronic medical problems. In this review we report on the smoking rates among youngsters with chronic illness, identify specific disease- and treatment-related complications that can be exacerbated by smoking, examine risk factors associated with tobacco use among medically compromised youngsters, and review smoking interventions that have been conducted to date with pediatric populations in the health care setting. The following chronic illnesses are included in this review: asthma, cystic fibrosis, cancer, sickle cell disease, juvenile-onset diabetes, and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Objectives for a tobacco-control agenda and recommendations for future tobacco studies in chronically ill pediatric populations are provided. Finally, tobacco counseling strategies are suggested for clinicians who treat these youngsters in their practices.

Predicting and modifying substance use in childhood cancer survivors: application of a conceptual model

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To identify factors that predict or modify substance use in childhood cancer survivors and to describe how a risk-counseling intervention reduced young survivors' substance use.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of clinical trial data and primary analysis of medical record data.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

SAMPLE

149 females and 118 males 12-18 years of age whose cancer had been in remission for at least two years were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 132) and standard care (n = 135) groups.

METHODS

Self-report questionnaires, abstracted medical record data, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Smoking, alcohol consumption, knowledge, risk perceptions, motivation, and worry about cancer and treatment effects.

FINDINGS

Three factors directly predicted substance use at baseline: being in a higher grade in school (independent of age), feelings of being more susceptible to late effects of cancer therapy, and worrying more about cancer and its treatment. At follow-up a year later, grade in school and worry predicted increased substance use. In addition, a desire to change health behavior, influenced by the intervention and gender, predicted decreased substance use. The mechanism of influence of the intervention was evident: The intervention led to a need to change, which precipitated a desire to change and ultimately resulted in decreased substance use.

CONCLUSIONS

Young survivors' worries and concerns about their cancer and treatment-related late effects are a new intervention target. Motivation is sensitive to behavioral change interventions and positively affects risk reduction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Two new intervention strategies to address the impact of survivors' concerns about their cancer and its treatment are implied: (a) Replace substance use with new coping methods to reduce fear and anxiety, and (b) tailor motivation-based interventions to age and gender to communicate graphically and realistically to survivors the personal importance of behavioral change in modifying the risks of late effects.