Heart failure in diabetic patients: utility of beta-blockade

Variability in the therapeutic response of Metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective

To assess the glycemic response of metformin in patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) as well as to see its association with reductions in BMI and GIT intolerance.

Methods

This Quasi, Experimental study was conducted at Jinnah-Allama Iqbal Institute of Diabetes and Endocrinology (JAIDE) Jinnah Hospital, Lahore from 1^st March 2016 to 30^th September 2016. Newly diagnosed T2DM patients were given metformin for duration of three months and later on they were categorized into Responders and Non-Responders on the basis of HbA1c (A1C) reductions, which were estimated by Hemoglobin (A1C) analyzer (TD4611A TAIDoc Tech. Taiwan) through photometry. Similarly, baseline BMI and BMI after three months therapy with metformin was also recorded.

Results

Among total of 200 patients, 40.5% of the patients were classified as Non-Responders whereas; 59.5% of the patients as Responders. The baseline BMI (26.09 kg/m²) was also decreased significantly after metformin therapy (25.40 kg/m²). It was found that metformin reduced the A1C in all the patients. However, the glycemic control was much better in patients with higher baseline A1C (1.13% ± 0.08) as compared to lower baseline levels (0.61% ± 0.07). Regarding GIT intolerance, 140 patients lacked the symptoms, out of which 60.7% were responders and 39.3% were non-responders.

Conclusions

Metformin lead to improvement in glycemic control in 59.5% of newly diagnosed T2DM patients after taking metformin for three months but in 40.5% it did not which may be because of combined effects of various gene polymorphisms and their interaction with non-genetic factors. Metformin reduced the BMI in all the patients; however, BMI lowering activity of metformin was same regardless of its effect on HbA1C. Moreover, the signs and symptoms of GIT intolerance did not differ between the two groups.

Effects of Syzygium aromaticum-derived oleanolic acid on glucose transport and glycogen synthesis in the rat small intestine

BACKGROUND

In the present study, we investigated the effects of oleanolic acid (OA), which has hypoglycemic properties, on glucose transport and glycogen synthesis in the small intestine, an organ that secretes enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism.

METHODS

The OA was isolated from Syzygium aromaticum ethyl acetate-soluble fractions followed by recrystallization with ethanol. It was diluted to required concentrations in freshly prepared dimethyl sulfoxide (2 mL) and normal saline (19 mL) before being administered to rats (p.o.). Glycogen concentrations were determined in isolated small intestines from fasted and non-fasted non-diabetic and streptozotocin-diabetic rats after 18 h treatment with 80 mg/kg, p.o., OA or standard hypoglycemic drugs (i.e. 100 μg/kg, s.c., insulin; 500 mg/kg, p.o., metformin). In a separate series of experiments, the effects of 30-min incubation with graded concentrations of OA (0.82-6.56 mmol/L) on d-glucose were evaluated by monitoring changes in glucose concentrations inside and outside of intestinal sacs isolated from fasted, non-diabetic rats and mounted in an organ bath containing Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer.

RESULTS

All in vivo treatments increased the glycogen concentration in rat small intestine, although the effects of metformin treatment in non-fasted diabetic rats failed to reach statistical significance. In vitro, both OA (1.64-6.56 mmol/L) and phlorizin (10(-5) -10(-3) mol/L) decreased glucose transport from the mucosa to the serosa.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that OA may be a potential alternative drug treatment for postprandial hyperglycemia because of its inhibition of glucose uptake across the small intestine and its concomitant conversion of glucose to glycogen in the intestinal wall.

Utilization of evidence-based treatment in elderly patients with chronic heart failure: using Korean Health Insurance claims database

Background

Chronic heart failure accounts for a great deal of the morbidity and mortality in the aging population. Evidence-based treatments include angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists. Underutilization of these treatments in heart failure patients were frequently reported, which could lead to increase morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization of evidence-based treatments and their related factors for elderly patients with chronic heart failure.

Methods

This is retrospective observational study using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. We identified prescription of evidence based treatment to elderly patients who had been hospitalized for chronic heart failure between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2006.

Results

Among the 28,922 elderly patients with chronic heart failure, beta-blockers were prescribed to 31.5%, and ACE-I or ARBs were prescribed to 54.7% of the total population. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the prescription from outpatient clinic (prevalent ratio, 4.02, 95% CI 3.31–4.72), specialty of the healthcare providers (prevalent ratio, 1.26, 95% CI, 1.12–1.54), residence in urban (prevalent ratio, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.23–1.52) and admission to tertiary hospital (prevalent ratio, 2.07, 95% CI, 1.85–2.31) were important factors associated with treatment underutilization. Patients not given evidence-based treatment were more likely to experience dementia, reside in rural areas, and have less-specialized healthcare providers and were less likely to have coexisting cardiovascular diseases or concomitant medications than patients in the evidence-based treatment group.

Conclusions

Healthcare system factors, such as hospital type, healthcare provider factors, such as specialty, and patient factors, such as comorbid cardiovascular disease, systemic disease with concomitant medications, together influence the underutilization of evidence-based pharmacologic treatment for patients with heart failure.

Diabetic cardiovascular disease: getting to the heart of the matter

Diabetes is a major risk factor for heart disease, and heart disease is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality among people living with diabetes. The diabetic metabolic milieu predisposes to aggressive obstructive coronary artery disease that causes heart attacks, heart failure, and death. Furthermore, diabetes can be associated with heart failure, independent of underlying coronary artery disease, hypertension, or valve abnormalities. The pathogenesis of the vascular and myocardial complications of diabetes is, as yet, incompletely understood. Although a number of medical and surgical approaches can improve outcomes in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease, much remains to be learned in order to optimize approaches to these critical complications.

Beta blocker use in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and systolic heart failure does not worsen glycaemic control

Background

The prognostic benefits of beta-blockers (BB) in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) are known but despite this, in patients with diabetes they are underutilized. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of beta-blockers (BB) on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) and systolic heart failure (SHF) stratified to beta-1 selective (Bisoprolol) vs. nonselective BB (Carvedilol).

Methods

This observational, cohort study was conducted in patients with T2DM and SHF attending an Australian tertiary teaching hospital's heart failure services. The primary endpoint was glycaemic control measured by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at initiation and top dose of BB. Secondary endpoints included microalbuminuria, changes in lipid profile and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results

125 patients were assessed. Both groups were well matched for gender, NYHA class and use of guideline validated heart failure and diabetic medications. The mean treatment duration was 1.9 ± 1.1 years with carvedilol and 1.4 ± 1.0 years with bisoprolol (p = ns). The carvedilol group achieved a reduction in HbA1c (7.8 ± 0.21% to 7.3 ± 0.17%, p = 0.02) whereas the bisoprolol group showed no change in HbA1c (7.0 ± 0.20% to 6.9 ± 0.23%, p = 0.92). There was no significant difference in the change in HbA1c from baseline to peak BB dose in the carvedilol group compared to the bisoprolol group. There was a similar deterioration in eGFR, but no significant changes in lipid profile or microalbuminuria in both groups (p = ns).

Conclusion

BB use did not worsen glycaemic control, lipid profile or albuminuria status in subjects with SHF and T2DM. Carvedilol significantly improved glycemic control in subjects with SHF and T2DM and this improvement was non significantly better than that obtained with bisoprolol. BB's should not be withheld from patients with T2DM and SHF.

Plasma adiponectin concentration and its association with metabolic syndrome in patients with heart failure

PURPOSE

Plasma adiponectin concentrations are inversely related with metabolic syndrome (MetS), and MetS is associated with increased risk for heart failure (HF). However, the relationship between adiponectin and MetS in HF remains undetermined. Therefore, we tested whether MetS was associated with the degree of plasma adiponectin concentrations in HF patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty eight ambulatory HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of <50% (80 males, 61.8 ± 11.9 years old) were enrolled for this cross-sectional study. Echocardiographic measurements were performed, and plasma concentrations of adiponectin, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins (apoB, apoA1) and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured.

RESULTS

Adiponectin concentrations in HF patients with MetS (n=43) were significantly lower than those without MetS (n=85) (9.7 ± 7.0 vs. 15.8 ± 10.9 μg/mL, p=0.001). Higher concentrations of apoB (p=0.017), apoB/A1 ratio (p<0.001), blood urea nitrogen (p=0.034), creatinine (p=0.003), and fasting insulin (p=0.004) were observed in HF patients with MetS compared with those without MetS. In HF patients with MetS, adiponectin concentrations were negatively correlated with hsCRP (r=-0.388, p=0.015) and positively correlated with the ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity, E/E' (r=0.399, p=0.015). There was a significant trend towards decreased adiponectin concentrations with an increasing number of components of MetS (p for trend=0.012).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that adiponectin concentrations decreased in HF patients with MetS, and that relationship between adiponectin, inflammation and abnormal diastolic function, possibly leading to the progression of HF.

Determinants of adiponectin levels in patients with chronic systolic heart failure

Adiponectin, an adipocytokine, is secreted by adipocytes and mediates antihypertrophic and anti-inflammatory effects in the heart. Plasma concentrations of adiponectin are decreased in the presence of obesity, insulin resistance, and obesity-associated conditions such as hypertension and coronary heart disease. However, a paradoxical increase in adiponectin levels is observed in human systolic heart failure (HF). We sought to investigate the determinants of adiponectin levels in patients with chronic systolic HF. Total adiponectin levels were measured in 99 patients with stable HF and a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of <40%. The determinants of adiponectin levels on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate linear regression model. At baseline, 62% of the patients were black, 63% were men, the mean age was 60 + or - 13 years, the LV ejection fraction was 21 + or - 9%, and the body mass index was 30.6 + or - 6.7 kg/m(2). The mean adiponectin level was 15.8 + or - 15 microg/ml. Beta-Blocker use, body mass index, and blood urea nitrogen were significant determinants of adiponectin level on multivariate analysis. The LV mass, structure, and LV ejection fraction were not related to adiponectin levels on multivariate analysis. The effect of beta-blocker therapy was most marked in nonobese patients with a body mass index <30 kg/m(2). In conclusion, in patients with chronic systolic HF, beta-blocker therapy correlated with lower adiponectin levels, especially in nonobese patients. This relation should be taken into account when studying the complex role of adiponectin in patients with chronic systolic HF.

Heart failure and diabetes mellitus: epidemiology and management of an alarming association

Diabetes mellitus is a growing epidemic with a prevalence among patients with heart failure (HF) approaching 30%. Diabetes worsens the prognosis of HF, and the pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial. Early detection of subtle alterations in cardiac function by modern tools, such as Doppler echocardiography or brain natriuretic peptide dosage, is thus important in these patients. All drugs known to be effective in HF with systolic dysfunction are also effective in patients with diabetes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists also seem particularly useful. Overall, however, little is known about the treatment of diabetic patients with HF, especially in case of preserved systolic function. Ongoing and future trials should help to determine the best treatment for these patients with or without associated diabetes. This review assesses the relationships between diabetes mellitus and HF and discusses the various medical strategies.

Heart failure: metabolic derangements and therapeutic rationale

In the USA, over two-thirds of patients with heart failure (HF) are cared for by primary care practitioners exclusively. Significant progress has been made through basic science and clinical research focusing on the prevention of HF via control of known risk factors. There has also been a great deal of progress in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of the disease. These therapeutic interventions, however, continue to be underutilized, with seemingly inadequate translation of new evidence and updated guidelines (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and Heart Failure Society of America updates in 2005-2006) into clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of HF in addition to the metabolic derangements and therapeutic rationale surrounding current treatment options, with a particular focus on the interventions that have been shown and recommended in updated guidelines to prevent the disease or halt its progression.

Significado pronóstico de la diabetes mellitus en una población con insuficiencia cardíaca: mortalidad e ingreso por insuficiencia cardíaca al cabo de un año

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The relationship between diabetes mellitus and heart failure is not fully established. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of diabetes and its prognostic significance, considering mortality and the need of hospital admission due to heart failure during the first year of follow-up, in an outpatient population with heart failure attended in a specialized Unit.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 362 patients -73% men; mean age (standard deviation) 65.3 (10.9) years-. Mean ejection fraction was 32.2% (12.7%). Patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I (5%), II (47%), III (43%) and IV (5%).

RESULTS

One-hundred forty-three out of 362 patients were diabetic (39.5%). Thirty patients (8%) died and 70 (19%) needed to be hospitalized due to heart failure during the first year of follow-up. One year mortality was 5% in non-diabetic patients and 13.3% in diabetic patients (p = 0.005). 13.2% of non-diabetic patients suffered at least one episode of heart failure needing hospital admission, whereas 28.7% of diabetic patients needed to be hospitalized at least once (p < 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, diabetes remained statistically associated both with mortality and with the need of heart failure related hospital admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes significantly correlated with a higher one year mortality as well as with a greater need of hospital admission due to heart failure. Prevalence of diabetes in a general population with heart failure was high.

Beta-blockers in selected heart failure populations

Despite the overwhelming evidence of the beneficial effect of beta-blockers in systolic heart failure, questions have been raised as to whether they provide similar benefits to women, the elderly, and blacks. Also, concerns about the use of beta-blockers in diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) have limited their use in populations with these diseases. A review of the experience generated from the three beta-blocker survival heart failure trials confirms the extension of similar beneficial effects to women, the elderly, blacks, and diabetic patients. There is strong support in the literature for the use of selective beta-blockers in patients with mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and encouraging data on their use in patients with mild to moderate PVD.

Diabetes mellitus and heart failure: basic mechanisms, clinical features, and therapeutic considerations

Diabetic cardiomyopathy encompasses the spectrum from subclinical disease to the full-blown syndrome of congestive heart failure. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing at an alarming rate in the western world. and with it, the frequency of diabetes-related heart failure. There is at least early suggestion that target-driven, long-term, intensified intervention that is aimed at multiple risk factors in patients who have type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria may reduce the risk of macrovascular (cardiovascular) and micro-vascular complications by approximately 50%. Thus, it is imperative that patients, particularly those who are at risk for the cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome, be screened aggressively for the presence of glucose intolerance and diabetes. When detected, all metabolic and cardio-vascular parameters should be evaluated and treated aggressively to reach currently recommended clinical targets. Such action will result in great benefit for patients by reducing morbidity and mortality and improving quality of life and will reduce the financial burden that is associated with this epidemic disease.

Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

Diabetes is a chronic progressive endocrinopathy associated with significant macrovascular and microvascular complications as well as cardiomyopathy and heart failure (HF). Diabetes and chronic systolic HF result in similar activation of pathologic neurohormonal pathways. When diabetes and HF coexist, morbidity and mortality significantly increase. This article reviews important clinical issues in the care of patients with diabetes and HF. A review of pertinent pathophysiologic principles is provided, followed by a discussion of the treatment issues related to this population. Treatment issues include vascular disease risk factor modification, HF pharmacotherapy, glycemic management, and control of other common comorbid conditions.