1
|
Mokhtari-Esbuie F, Szeglin B, Ravari MR, Duncan M, Harmon JW. Pioneering use of genetic analysis for CDH1 to identify candidates for prophylactic total gastrectomy to prevent hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. EGASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 1:e100017. [PMID: 38188186 PMCID: PMC10769461 DOI: 10.1136/egastro-2023-100017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Worldwide, gastric cancer results in significant morbidity and mortality. Ten per cent of patients with gastric cancer have a strong family history of the disease. CDH1 (E-cadherin) has been identified as a key gene whose mutation leads to hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. We overviewed 33 articles with prophylactic total gastrectomy and assessed the outcomes and benefits. Families with mutations in CDH1 may benefit from early prophylactic total gastrectomy. Dr Mark Duncan has applied his experience as a high-volume gastric cancer surgeon to treat not only individual patients, but several generations of patients within a family. This use of prophylactic total gastrectomy is well tolerated by patients and prevents the future development of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bryan Szeglin
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Mark Duncan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John W Harmon
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Dieren JM, van der Post RS, Bisseling TM. Shifting perceptions on endoscopic surveillance and timing of prophylactic gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1028-1029. [PMID: 37354063 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tanya M Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallanis AF, Davis JL. Unique challenges of risk-reducing surgery for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome: a narrative review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2023; 32:391-395. [PMID: 36977191 PMCID: PMC10249595 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
The common use of genetic testing has reinvigorated discussions surrounding enhanced cancer surveillance, chemoprevention, and preventive surgery strategies due to increasing recognition of pathogenic germline genetic variants. Prophylactic surgery for hereditary cancer syndromes can significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), characterized by high penetrance and an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, is causally linked to germline mutations in the CDH1 tumor suppressor gene. Risk-reducing total gastrectomy is currently recommended in patients with pathogenic and likely pathogenic CDH1 variants; however, the physical and psychosocial sequelae of complete stomach removal are substantial and need to be investigated further. In this review, we address the risks and benefits of prophylactic total gastrectomy for HDGC in the context of prophylactic surgery for other highly penetrant cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber F. Gallanis
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeremy L. Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tankel J, Markar S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Ferri L, Cools-Lartigue J. Endoscopic surveillance in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e286. [PMID: 37414014 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00212-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James Tankel
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Sheraz Markar
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Marc van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Jonathan Cools-Lartigue
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pilonis ND, O'Donovan M, Richardson S, Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M. Confocal endomicroscopy diagnostic criteria for early signet-ring cell carcinoma in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:176. [PMID: 37221458 PMCID: PMC10207770 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02822-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recognition of early signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) in patients with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) undergoing endoscopic surveillance is challenging. We hypothesized that probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) might help diagnose early cancerous lesions in the context of HDGC. The aim of this study was to identify pCLE diagnostic criteria for early SRCC. METHODS Patients with HDGC syndrome were prospectively recruited and pCLE assessment was performed on areas suspicious for early SRCC and control regions during an endoscopic surveillance procedure. Targeted biopsies were taken for gold standard histologic assessment. In Phase I two investigators assessed video sequences off-line to identify pCLE features related to SRCC. In Phase II pCLE diagnostic criteria were evaluated in an independent video set by the investigators blinded to the histologic diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS Forty-two video sequences from 16 HDGC patients were included in Phase I. Four pCLE patterns associated to SRCC histologic features were identified: (A) glands with attenuated margins, (B) glands with spiculated or irregular shape, (C) heterogenous granular stroma with sparse glands, (D) enlarged vessels with tortuous shape. In Phase II, 38 video sequences from 15 patients were assessed. Criteria A and B and C had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a κ for interobserver agreement ranging from 0.153 to 0.565. A panel comprising these 3 criteria with a cut-off of at least one positive criterion had a sensitivity of 80.9% (95%CI:58.1-94.5%) and a specificity of 70.6% (95%CI:44.0-89.7%) for a diagnosis of SRCC. CONCLUSIONS We have generated and validated off-line pCLE criteria for early SRCC. Future real-time validation of these criteria is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nastazja D Pilonis
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria O'Donovan
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
- Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan Richardson
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asif B, Sarvestani AL, Gamble LA, Samaranayake SG, Famiglietti AL, Fasaye GA, Quezado M, Miettinen M, Korman L, Koh C, Heller T, Davis JL. Cancer surveillance as an alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:383-391. [PMID: 36990610 PMCID: PMC10084814 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00057-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loss of function variants in CDH1 are the most frequent cause of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Endoscopy is regarded as insufficient for early detection due to the infiltrative phenotype of diffuse-type cancers. Microscopic foci of invasive signet ring cells are pathognomonic of CDH1 and precede development of diffuse gastric cancer. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of endoscopy for cancer interception in individuals with germline CDH1 variants, particularly in those who declined prophylactic total gastrectomy. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, we included asymptomatic patients aged 2 years or older with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline CDH1 variants who underwent endoscopic screening and surveillance at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) as part of a natural history study of hereditary gastric cancers (NCT03030404). Endoscopy was done with non-targeted biopsies and one or more targeted biopsy and assessment of focal lesions. Endoscopy findings, pathological data, personal and family cancer history, and demographics were recorded. Procedural morbidity, gastric cancer detection by endoscopy and gastrectomy, and cancer-specific events were assessed. Screening was defined as the initial endoscopy and all subsequent endoscopies were considered surveillance; follow-up endoscopy was at 6 to 12 months. The primary aim was to determine effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance for detection of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma. FINDINGS Between Jan 25, 2017, and Dec 12, 2021, 270 patients (median age 46·6 years [IQR 36·5-59·8], 173 [64%] female participants, 97 [36%] male participants; 250 [93%] were non-Hispanic White, eight [3%] were multiracial, four [2%] were non-Hispanic Black, three [1%] were Hispanic, two [1%] were Asian, and one [<1%] was American Indian or Alaskan Native) with germline CDH1 variants were screened, in whom 467 endoscopies were done as of data cutoff (April 30, 2022). 213 (79%) of 270 patients had a family history of gastric cancer, and 176 (65%) reported a family history of breast cancer. Median follow-up was 31·1 months (IQR 17·1-42·1). 38 803 total gastric biopsy samples were obtained, of which 1163 (3%) were positive for invasive signet ring cell carcinoma. Signet ring cell carcinoma was detected in 76 (63%) of 120 patients who had two or more surveillance endoscopies, of whom 74 had occult cancer detected; the remaining two individuals developed focal ulcerations each corresponding to pT3N0 stage carcinoma. 98 (36%) of 270 patients proceeded to prophylactic total gastrectomy. Among patients who had a prophylactic total gastrectomy after an endoscopy with biopsy samples negative for cancer (42 [43%] of 98), multifocal stage IA gastric carcinoma was detected in 39 (93%). Two (1%) participants died during follow-up, one due to metastatic lobular breast cancer and the other due to underlying cerebrovascular disease, and no participants were diagnosed with advanced stage (III or IV) cancer during follow-up. INTERPRETATION In our cohort, endoscopic cancer surveillance was an acceptable alternative to surgery in individuals with CDH1 variants who declined total gastrectomy. The low rate of incident tumours (>T1a) suggests that surveillance might be a rational alternative to surgery in individuals with CDH1 variants. FUNDING Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilal Asif
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amber Leila Sarvestani
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lauren A Gamble
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah G Samaranayake
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amber L Famiglietti
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Grace-Ann Fasaye
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martha Quezado
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Louis Korman
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Koh
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Theo Heller
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van der Post RS, Bisseling TM, van Dieren JM. Endoscopic surveillance: time for a paradigm shift in hereditary diffuse-type gastric cancer management? Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:311-312. [PMID: 36990606 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00094-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
8
|
Decourtye-Espiard L, Guilford P. Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:719-735. [PMID: 36740198 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a dominantly inherited cancer syndrome characterized by a high incidence of diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). HDGC is caused by germline mutations in 2 genes involved in the epithelial adherens junction complex, CDH1 and CTNNA1. We discuss the genetics of HDGC and the variability of its clinical phenotype, in particular the variable penetrance of advanced DGC and LBC, both within and between families. We review the pathology of the disease, the mechanism of tumor initiation, and its natural history. Finally, we describe current best practice for the clinical management of HDGC, including emerging genetic testing criteria for the identification of new families, methods for endoscopic surveillance, the complications associated with prophylactic surgery, postoperative quality of life, and the emerging field of HDGC chemoprevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyvianne Decourtye-Espiard
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Translational Cancer Research (Te Aho Matatū), Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Parry Guilford
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Translational Cancer Research (Te Aho Matatū), Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Muranaka F, Kise E, Tokumaru S, Kitazawa M, Miyagawa Y, Suga T, Uehara T, Iwaya M, Kobayashi S, Sato M, Gomi D, Yamada H, Sugimura H, Kosho T, Soejima Y, Koizumi T. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer in a Japanese family with CDH1 mutation three case reports. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:14. [PMID: 36719602 PMCID: PMC9889585 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00623-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline pathogenic variants in the E-cadherin gene CDH1 cause hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), which is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome, accounting for 1-3% of all gastric cancers. HDGC harboring a CDH 1 variant is extremely rare in Japan. METHOD In this study we report the clinical courses of three cases with HDGC from a single Japanese family. RESULTS The proband exhibited advanced and metastatic gastric cancer, and was found to have a previously reported heterozygous frameshift variant in CDH1 (NM_004360.3:c.1009_1010del:p.Ser337Phefs*12). Five at-risk relatives underwent presymptomatic molecular testing after careful genetic counseling, and three were molecularly diagnosed as positive for the variant. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in these relatives revealing abnormal small pale mucosal patches, small ulcerative lesion and no abnormal findings. Moreover, random and targeted biopsies were compatible with pathological diagnosis of HDGC in the three cases, all of which underwent total prophylactic gastrectomy. CONCLUSION It is critical for the assessment and management of HDGC patients to be actively offered a multidisciplinary and familial-oriented approach. Notably, genetic screening in suspected individuals and familial members is a determining piece for a higher detection rate and the identification of clinical relevant mutations in both low and high-incidence gastric cancer countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Futoshi Muranaka
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Emiko Kise
- Center for Medical Genetics, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Shigeo Tokumaru
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Masato Kitazawa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Miyagawa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Suga
- Endoscopic Examination Center, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Uehara
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Mai Iwaya
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Shota Kobayashi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Midori Sato
- Department of Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki City, Japan
| | - Daisuke Gomi
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Yamada
- The First Department of Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Sugimura
- The First Department of Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Tomoki Kosho
- Center for Medical Genetics, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
- Department of Medical Genetics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
- Research Center for Supports to Advanced Science, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan
- Division of Clinical Sequencing, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Soejima
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Tomonobu Koizumi
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Effects of Tumor Localization, Age, and Stage on the Outcomes of Gastric and Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030714. [PMID: 36765680 PMCID: PMC9913295 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Signet ring cell adenocarcinomas (SRCCs) are a rare histological adenocarcinoma subtype, classically thought to have a worse prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The majority of these cancers occur in the stomach, colon, and rectum. Their rarity means that most epidemiological studies into their pathology are often underpowered, and interpretations from these reports are mixed. In this study, we use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database to examine the effects of tumor localization, age, and stage on gastric and colorectal cancer outcomes. For early onset localized and regional gastric cancers, SRCCs have the same overall risk of mortality compared to conventional adenocarcinomas. Over the age of 50 years, SRCCs have worse outcomes across all stages. Gastric SRCCs are 2-3-fold more likely in younger patients, and more heavily favor the distal stomach. Like conventional adenocarcinomas, proximal gastric SRCCs have decreased survival. Across all ages, stages, and locations, colorectal SRCCs have worse outcomes. SRCCs favor the right colon, but outcomes are significantly worse for the left colon and rectal cancers. Relative to adenocarcinomas, colorectal SRCCs have the worst outcomes in younger patients. Overall, these results provide insights into SRCC disease patterns that cannot be surmised outside of population-level data.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee CYC, Olivier A, Honing J, Lydon AM, Richardson S, O'Donovan M, Tischkowitz M, Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M. Endoscopic surveillance with systematic random biopsy for the early diagnosis of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a prospective 16-year longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:107-116. [PMID: 36509094 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00700-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, generally caused by germline pathogenic variants in CDH1, presents with early-onset signet ring cell carcinoma. Prophylactic total gastrectomy is the definitive treatment. Endoscopic surveillance can inform the timing of prophylactic total gastrectomy through detection of microscopic signet ring cell carcinoma foci. However, evidence is scarce about the optimal endoscopic sampling technique and characterisation of signet ring cell carcinoma foci in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. We aimed to formally assess the diagnostic yield of different sampling strategies and to identify criteria for the characterisation of endoscopic lesions. METHODS For this prospective longitudinal cohort study, we included individuals aged 18 years or older at the Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust who fulfilled testing criteria for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer between June 1, 2005, and July 31, 2021. The primary outcome was detection of intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma foci. We assessed the detection rate and anatomical location of signet ring cell carcinoma in random biopsy samples taken according to a systematic protocol compared with biopsies targeted to endoscopic findings. Endoscopic lesions were examined with white-light and narrow band imaging with magnification to assess the likelihood of cancerous foci. FINDINGS 145 individuals were included, of whom 68 (47%) were male and 92 (63%) carried the CDH1 pathogenic variant. 58 (40%) patients were diagnosed with invasive signet ring cell carcinoma over a median follow-up time of 51 months (IQR 18-80). The first diagnosis of signet ring cell carcinoma was most commonly made from random biopsies (29 [50%] of 58 patients), rather than targeted biopsies (15 [26%] patients). The anatomical distribution of signet ring cell carcinoma foci detected by random biopsies more accurately reflected those identified in prophylactic total gastrectomy specimens than did targeted biopsies. Omitting random biopsies in our cohort would have led to an under-diagnosis rate of 42%. Using a novel panel of endoscopic criteria, gastric lesions containing signet ring cell carcinoma were predicted with a sensitivity of 67·3% and a specificity of 90·2%. INTERPRETATION Random biopsies enhance the early detection of signet ring cell carcinoma and are complementary to targeted biopsies in surveillance of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. This sampling method should be the standard of care when performing all surveillance endoscopies for individuals with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. FUNDING UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Y C Lee
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adriaan Olivier
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judith Honing
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Lydon
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan Richardson
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maria O'Donovan
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rebecca C Fitzgerald
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Massimiliano di Pietro
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dardenne A, Sirmai L, Metras J, Enea D, Svrcek M, Benusiglio PR. Prédispositions génétiques au cancer gastrique et leur association au type histologique. Bull Cancer 2022; 110:512-520. [PMID: 35963792 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
About 5% of gastric cancers are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Histology is paramount in this context, as major susceptibility genes are associated with specific subtypes. Germline pathogenic variants in CDH1 and CTNNA1 cause Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC). Major advances have been made in the past ten years regarding HDGC. Penetrance estimates for diffuse cancer are now lower than previously thought, at 30-40%. Surveillance upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is now an acceptable alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy. Indeed, its sensitivity in detecting advanced disease is satisfactory assuming it is performed by an expert and according to a specific protocol. The risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer is increased in patients with Lynch syndrome, although it is much lower than the risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. Intestinal-type gastric cancers are also observed in excess in patients with hereditary polyposis, the main one being APC-associated familial adenomatous polyposis. The main and most clinically relevant manifestations in patients with polyposes remain colorectal and duodenal polyps and carcinomas, well ahead of gastric cancer. Finally, recent data point towards increased gastric cancer risk in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer: Molecular Genetics, Biological Mechanisms and Current Therapeutic Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23147821. [PMID: 35887173 PMCID: PMC9319245 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by a high prevalence of diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. It is caused by inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor gene CDH1. Genetic testing technologies have become more efficient over the years, also enabling the discovery of other susceptibility genes for gastric cancer, such as CTNNA1 among the most important genes. The diagnosis of pathogenic variant carriers with an increased risk of developing gastric cancer is a selection process involving a multidisciplinary team. To achieve optimal long-term results, it requires shared decision-making in risk management. In this review, we present a synopsis of the molecular changes and current therapeutic approaches in HDGC based on the current literature.
Collapse
|
14
|
Diffuse gastric cancer: Emerging mechanisms of tumor initiation and progression. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022; 1877:188719. [PMID: 35307354 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is globally the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) particularly have a poor prognosis that only marginally improved over the last decades, as conventional chemotherapies are frequently ineffective and specific therapies are unavailable. Early-stage DGC is characterized by intramucosal lesions of discohesive cells, which can be present for many years before the emergence of advanced DGC consisting of highly proliferative and invasive cells. The mechanisms underlying the key steps of DGC development and transition to aggressive tumors are starting to emerge. Novel mouse- and organoid models for DGC, together with multi-omic analyses of DGC tumors, revealed contributions of both tumor cell-intrinsic alterations and gradual changes in the tumor microenvironment to DGC progression. In this review, we will discuss how these recent findings are leading towards an understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for DGC initiation and malignancy, which may provide opportunities for targeted therapies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gamble LA, Davis JL. Surveillance and Surgical Considerations in Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:163-175. [PMID: 34798984 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Inactivating germline variants in the CDH1 tumor suppressor gene cause the hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. Total gastrectomy is recommended for prevention, although it is associated with adverse outcomes and chronic health risks. Gastric cancer surveillance is an alternative to surgery; however, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is limited by poor sensitivity. Cancer surveillance requires accurate detection of early carcinoma and patient-specific disease penetrance estimates. Current clinical care should incorporate up-to-date information on variable disease penetrance, which does not seem to correlate with CDH1 genotype. Affected patients and families warrant a balanced presentation of options for cancer surveillance and prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Gamble
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 4-3742, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 4-3742, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
CDH1 Gene Mutation Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer Outcomes: Analysis of a Large Cohort, Systematic Review of Endoscopic Surveillance, and Secondary Cancer Risk Postulation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112622. [PMID: 34073553 PMCID: PMC8199234 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Some patients carry a mutated copy of the CDH1 gene that can lead to a very rare form of hereditary gastric cancer called signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (SRCC). SRCCs rarely form visible tumors prior to spreading. Hence, patients are recommended to have prophylactic gastrectomies at a young age. Many patients wish to avoid surgery and thus have regular checks with upper endoscopy with biopsies to rule out cancer. Further, these patients may also be at risk of other cancers beyond the already known breast cancer risks, but this is not known. In this study, we show that despite systematic biopsy protocols, many early cancers might be missed on endoscopy. Therefore, patients should not rely on endoscopy to delay surgery. These patients may also be at increased risk of colorectal SRCC, which has very poor survival outcomes. To confirm this, we need a central database that captures outcomes for this patient population. Abstract Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a rare signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (SRCC) linked to CDH1 (E-cadherin) inactivating germline mutations, and increasingly other gene mutations. Female CDH1 mutation carriers have additional risk of lobular breast cancer. Risk management includes prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG). The utility of endoscopic surveillance is unclear, as early disease lacks macroscopic lesions. The current systematic biopsy protocols have unknown efficacy, and other secondary cancer risks are postulated. We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive asymptomatic HDGC patients undergoing PTG, detailing endoscopic, pathologic, and outcome results. A systematic review compared endoscopic biopsy foci detection via random sampling versus Cambridge Protocol against PTG findings. A population-level secondary-cancer-risk postulation among sporadic gastric SRCC patients was completed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Of 97 patients, 67 underwent PTG, with 25% having foci detection on random endoscopic biopsy despite 75% having foci on final pathology. There was no improvement in the endoscopic detection rate by Cambridge Protocol. The postulated hazard ratio among sporadic gastric SRCC patients for a secondary colorectal SRCC was three-fold higher, relative to conventional adenocarcinoma patients. Overall, HDGC patients should not rely on endoscopic surveillance to delay PTG, and may have secondary SRCC risks. A definitive determination of actual risk requires collaborative patient outcome data banking.
Collapse
|
17
|
CDH1 pathogenic variants and cancer risk in an unselected patient population. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:235-239. [PMID: 33886068 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00257-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
CDH1 pathogenic variants confer a markedly elevated lifetime risk of developing diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of CDH1 pathogenic variants in the unselected and ancestrally diverse BioMe Biobank. We evaluated exome sequence data from 30,223 adult BioMe participants to identify CDH1 positive individuals, defined as those harboring a variant previously classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic or a predicted loss-of-function variant in CDH1. We reviewed electronic health records and BioMe enrollment surveys for personal and family history of malignancy and evidence of prior clinical genetic testing. Using a genomics-first approach, we identified 6 CDH1 positive individuals in BioMe (~ 1 in 5000). CDH1 positive individuals had a median age of 42 years (range 35-62 years), all were non-European by self-report, and one was female. None had evidence of either a personal or family history of DGC or LBC. Our findings suggest a low risk of DGC and LBC in unselected patients harboring a pathogenic variant in CDH1. Knowledge of CDH1-related cancer risk in individuals with no personal or family history may better inform surveillance and prophylactic measures.
Collapse
|
18
|
Schueler SA, Gamble LA, Curtin BF, Ruff SM, Connolly M, Hannah C, Quezado M, Miettinen M, George M, Blakely AM, Hernandez JM, Heller T, Koh C, Davis JL. Evaluation of confocal laser endomicroscopy for detection of occult gastric carcinoma in CDH1 variant carriers. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:216-225. [PMID: 34012620 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome, attributed to inactivating germline CDH1 variants, is associated with an elevated lifetime risk of gastric cancer. We sought to evaluate cancer detection using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) during endoscopic surveillance. Methods A prospective, single-institution study was conducted in asymptomatic adults with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CDH1 variants. Subjects received endoscopic gastric surveillance using pCLE in conjunction with the Cambridge method (CM). Abnormalities visualized by pCLE were biopsied, followed by non-targeted mucosal biopsies according to the CM. Primary endpoint was to determine pCLE sensitivity for detection of occult SRC carcinoma compared to CM. Results Thirty-six patients with P/LP CDH1 variants underwent endoscopy using pCLE and CM. Majority were female (75%) with median age 47 years. Targeted biopsies of focal abnormalities on WLE were negative for carcinoma. Overall, 19.4% (7/36) patients had SRC detected on ≥1 biopsy. Non-targeted CM biopsies revealed SRC in 11.1% (4/36), whereas pCLE revealed SRC in 16.7% (6/36). Fifteen patients underwent total gastrectomy; all 15 explants contained occult carcinoma. In those 15 patients, the false-negative SRC detection rates for pCLE and CM were 67% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions Confocal endomicroscopy alone has low sensitivity for occult cancer detection in CDH1 variant carriers, although it appeared no worse than the current recommended method and required fewer biopsies per patient. A more reliable endoscopic surveillance is needed as a viable alternative to surgery in this high-risk population (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03648879).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Schueler
- Digestive Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lauren A Gamble
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bryan F Curtin
- Digestive Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Samantha M Ruff
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Maureen Connolly
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cathleen Hannah
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martha Quezado
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Maureen George
- Clinical Center Nursing Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Theo Heller
- Digestive Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Koh
- Digestive Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gamble LA, Heller T, Davis JL. Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer Syndrome and the Role of CDH1: A Review. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:387-392. [PMID: 33404644 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Importance Inherited variants in the tumor suppressor gene CDH1 are associated with an increased risk of gastric and breast cancers. This review aims to address the most current topics in management of the hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome attributed to CDH1. Observations Consensus management guidelines have broadened genetic testing criteria for CDH1. Prophylactic total gastrectomy is recommended for any pathogenic or likely pathogenic CDH1 variant carrier starting at the age of 20 years. Annual surveillance endoscopy is recommended to those who defer prophylactic total gastrectomy. Women with a CDH1 variant should initiate magnetic resonance imaging breast surveillance starting at age 30 years. Further research is needed to understand the pathogenesis of early-stage gastric cancers (T1a), which are pathognomonic of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome, that lead to advanced gastric cancer to develop both treatment and prevention strategies for this patient population. Conclusions and Relevance The heritable CDH1 gene mutation is of importance to today's surgeons because it is associated with a substantial increased risk of developing both gastric and breast cancers. Management of this cancer syndrome currently uses prophylactic surgery and enhanced cancer surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Gamble
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Theo Heller
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the world. Between 1% and 3% of cases are associated with specific genetic cancer risk syndromes. The purpose of this article is to review the latest insights, as well as gaps in knowledge, regarding some of the most common hereditary gastric cancer syndromes: hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS), Lynch syndrome, the adenomatous polyposis syndromes, and the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes. Recent findings Patients carrying pathogenic variants in CDH1, but not meeting clinical criteria for HDGC, are increasingly being identified thanks to multigene panel testing; their absence from previous analyses overestimated gastric cancer penetrance. GAPPS is a recently described hereditary gastric cancer syndrome associated with specific point mutations in the promoter 1B region of the APC gene. Summary Risk of gastric cancer is highest among carriers of pathogenic variants in CDH1, with cumulative incidences approximately 40% and 30% for men and women, respectively. Mutations associated with Lynch syndrome and adenomatous polyposis syndromes confer greatest risk for gastric cancer in East Asian populations. Risk of gastric cancer in GAPPS and hamartomatous polyposis syndromes is difficult to estimate due to their rarity, but mutation status likely determines risk. Future research is needed to more precisely define risk of gastric cancer in these syndromes, so strategies for screening and prophylactic gastrectomy can be optimized.
Collapse
|
21
|
Pilonis ND, Tischkowitz M, Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M. Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer: Approaches to Screening, Surveillance, and Treatment. Annu Rev Med 2020; 72:263-280. [PMID: 33217247 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-051019-103216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a cancer syndrome associated with a significant lifetime risk of diffuse gastric cancer (DGC), a malignancy characterized by late clinical presentation and poor prognosis, as well as lobular breast cancer. HDGC is linked to germline pathogenic variants in the E-cadherin gene (CDH1) that are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern; however, in many families with DGC clustering, no genetic cause has been identified. This review discusses key elements that allow risk assessment of potential inherited DGC susceptibility. We provide a practical overview of the recommendations for surveillance and treatment of individuals at risk and patients with early disease. The review also outlines future research avenues to improve our understanding of the genetic background and natural history of the disease, the endoscopic detection of early lesions, and the outcome of prophylactic surgery in young individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nastazja Dagny Pilonis
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom; .,The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw 02-781, Poland
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Blair VR, McLeod M, Carneiro F, Coit DG, D'Addario JL, van Dieren JM, Harris KL, Hoogerbrugge N, Oliveira C, van der Post RS, Arnold J, Benusiglio PR, Bisseling TM, Boussioutas A, Cats A, Charlton A, Schreiber KEC, Davis JL, Pietro MD, Fitzgerald RC, Ford JM, Gamet K, Gullo I, Hardwick RH, Huntsman DG, Kaurah P, Kupfer SS, Latchford A, Mansfield PF, Nakajima T, Parry S, Rossaak J, Sugimura H, Svrcek M, Tischkowitz M, Ushijima T, Yamada H, Yang HK, Claydon A, Figueiredo J, Paringatai K, Seruca R, Bougen-Zhukov N, Brew T, Busija S, Carneiro P, DeGregorio L, Fisher H, Gardner E, Godwin TD, Holm KN, Humar B, Lintott CJ, Monroe EC, Muller MD, Norero E, Nouri Y, Paredes J, Sanches JM, Schulpen E, Ribeiro AS, Sporle A, Whitworth J, Zhang L, Reeve AE, Guilford P. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e386-e397. [PMID: 32758476 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30219-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 213] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome that is characterised by a high prevalence of diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. It is largely caused by inactivating germline mutations in the tumour suppressor gene CDH1, although pathogenic variants in CTNNA1 occur in a minority of families with HDGC. In this Policy Review, we present updated clinical practice guidelines for HDGC from the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC), which recognise the emerging evidence of variability in gastric cancer risk between families with HDGC, the growing capability of endoscopic and histological surveillance in HDGC, and increased experience of managing long-term sequelae of total gastrectomy in young patients. To redress the balance between the accessibility, cost, and acceptance of genetic testing and the increased identification of pathogenic variant carriers, the HDGC genetic testing criteria have been relaxed, mainly through less restrictive age limits. Prophylactic total gastrectomy remains the recommended option for gastric cancer risk management in pathogenic CDH1 variant carriers. However, there is increasing confidence from the IGCLC that endoscopic surveillance in expert centres can be safely offered to patients who wish to postpone surgery, or to those whose risk of developing gastric cancer is not well defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa R Blair
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; St Marks Breast Centre, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Maybelle McLeod
- Kimihauora Health and Research Clinic, Mt Maunganui, New Zealand
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Daniel G Coit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Carla Oliveira
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Julie Arnold
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Patrick R Benusiglio
- Consultation d'Oncogénétique, Unité Fonctionnelle d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique, DMU BioGeM, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Tanya M Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Amanda Charlton
- Department of Histopathology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Jeremy L Davis
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - James M Ford
- Division of Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kimberley Gamet
- Genetic Health Service New Zealand Northern Hub, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Irene Gullo
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Richard H Hardwick
- Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Pardeep Kaurah
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Hereditary Cancer Program, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sonia S Kupfer
- Section of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Hepatology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Latchford
- St Mark's Hospital, London, UK; Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - Takeshi Nakajima
- Department of Clinical Genetic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Susan Parry
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jeremy Rossaak
- Department of Surgery, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Haruhiko Sugimura
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Magali Svrcek
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Pathology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Toshikazu Ushijima
- Division of Epigenomics, National Cancer Centre Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Yamada
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Adrian Claydon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Joana Figueiredo
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Karyn Paringatai
- Te Tumu School of Māori, Pacific and Indigenous Studies, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Raquel Seruca
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nicola Bougen-Zhukov
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Tom Brew
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Patricia Carneiro
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Erin Gardner
- Kimihauora Health and Research Clinic, Mt Maunganui, New Zealand
| | - Tanis D Godwin
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Katharine N Holm
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California Davis School Of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Bostjan Humar
- Laboratory of the Swiss Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplantation Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline J Lintott
- Genetic Health Service New Zealand South Island Hub, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Enrique Norero
- Esophagogastric Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Dr Sotero del Rio, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Yasmin Nouri
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Joana Paredes
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - João M Sanches
- Institute for Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Emily Schulpen
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Ana S Ribeiro
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde & Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andrew Sporle
- Healthier Lives National Science Challenge, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - James Whitworth
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anthony E Reeve
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Parry Guilford
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Te Aho Matatū, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Corso G, Montagna G, Figueiredo J, La Vecchia C, Fumagalli Romario U, Fernandes MS, Seixas S, Roviello F, Trovato C, Guerini-Rocco E, Fusco N, Pravettoni G, Petrocchi S, Rotili A, Massari G, Magnoni F, De Lorenzi F, Bottoni M, Galimberti V, Sanches JM, Calvello M, Seruca R, Bonanni B. Hereditary Gastric and Breast Cancer Syndromes Related to CDH1 Germline Mutation: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1598. [PMID: 32560361 PMCID: PMC7352390 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
E-cadherin (CDH1 gene) germline mutations are associated with the development of diffuse gastric cancer in the context of the so-called hereditary diffuse gastric syndrome, and with an inherited predisposition of lobular breast carcinoma. In 2019, the international gastric cancer linkage consortium revised the clinical criteria and established guidelines for the genetic screening of CDH1 germline syndromes. Nevertheless, the introduction of multigene panel testing in clinical practice has led to an increased identification of E-cadherin mutations in individuals without a positive family history of gastric or breast cancers. This observation motivated us to review and present a novel multidisciplinary clinical approach (nutritional, surgical, and image screening) for single subjects who present germline CDH1 mutations but do not fulfil the classic clinical criteria, namely those identified as-(1) incidental finding and (2) individuals with lobular breast cancer without family history of gastric cancer (GC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.); (V.G.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (E.G.-R.); (N.F.); (G.P.)
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Joana Figueiredo
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.F.); (M.S.F.); (S.S.); (R.S.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Uberto Fumagalli Romario
- Department of Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Maria Sofia Fernandes
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.F.); (M.S.F.); (S.S.); (R.S.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Susana Seixas
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.F.); (M.S.F.); (S.S.); (R.S.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Franco Roviello
- Departments of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy;
| | - Cristina Trovato
- Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (E.G.-R.); (N.F.); (G.P.)
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (E.G.-R.); (N.F.); (G.P.)
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (E.G.-R.); (N.F.); (G.P.)
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Serena Petrocchi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Rotili
- Division of Breast Imaging, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giulia Massari
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.); (V.G.)
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.); (V.G.)
| | - Francesca De Lorenzi
- Division of Plastic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.D.L.); (M.B.)
| | - Manuela Bottoni
- Division of Plastic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.D.L.); (M.B.)
| | - Viviana Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.); (V.G.)
| | - João Miguel Sanches
- Institute for Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Mariarosaria Calvello
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (B.B.)
| | - Raquel Seruca
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.F.); (M.S.F.); (S.S.); (R.S.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Medical Faculty, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|