1
|
Amor-García MÁ, Chamorro-de-Vega E, Rodríguez-González CG, Iglesias-Peinado I, Moreno-Díaz R. Effects of a Pharmacist-Designed Clinical Decision Support System on Antimicrobial Stewardship. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15:679-688. [PMID: 38857881 PMCID: PMC11324356 DOI: 10.1055/a-2341-8823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are computer applications, which can be applied to give guidance to practitioners in antimicrobial stewardship (AS) activities; however, further information is needed for their optimal use. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to analyze the implementation of a CDSS program in a second-level hospital, describing alerts, recommendations, and the effects on consumption and clinical outcomes. METHODS In October 2020, a pharmacist-driven CDSS designed for AS was implemented in a second-level hospital. The program provides a list of alerts related to antimicrobial treatment and microbiology, which were automatized for revision by the AS professionals. To analyze the implementation of the CDSS, a pre-post-intervention, retrospective study was designed. AS-triggered alerts and recommendations (total number and rate of acceptance) were compiled. The effect of the CDSS was measured using antimicrobial consumption, duration of antimicrobial treatments, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS) for patients admitted for infectious causes. RESULTS The AS team revised a total of 7,543 alerts and 772 patients had at least one recommendation, with an acceptance rate of 79.3%. Antimicrobial consumption decreased from 691.1 to 656.8 defined daily doses (DDD)/1,000 beds-month (p = 0.04) and the duration of antimicrobial treatment from 3.6 to 3.3 days (p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality decreased from 6.6 to 6.2% (p = 0.46) and mean LOS from 7.2 to 6.2 days (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The implementation of a CDSS resulted in a significant reduction of antimicrobial DDD, duration of antimicrobial treatments, and hospital LOS. There was no significant difference in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther Chamorro-de-Vega
- Pharmacy Service, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Irene Iglesias-Peinado
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy and Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Moreno-Díaz
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Parla, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grubenhoff JA, Bakel LA, Dominguez F, Leonard J, Widmer K, Sanders JS, Spencer SP, Stein JM, Searns JB. Clinical Pathway Adherence and Missed Diagnostic Opportunities Among Children with Musculoskeletal Infections. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2023; 49:547-556. [PMID: 37495472 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical care pathways (CPs) integrate best evidence into the local care delivery context to promote efficiency and patient safety. However, the impact of CPs on diagnostic performance remains poorly understood. The objectives of this study were to evaluate adherence to a musculoskeletal infection (MSKI) diagnostic CP and identify recurrent failure points leading to missed diagnostic opportunities (MDOs). METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed from January 2018 to February 2022 for children 6 months to 18 years of age who had an unplanned admission for MSKI after being evaluated and discharged from the pediatric emergency department (PED) for related complaints within the previous 10 days. MDOs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx. Demographic and clinical characteristics of children with and without MDOs were compared using bivariate descriptive statistics. An improvement team reviewed the diagnostic trajectories of MDOs for deviations from the MSKI CP and developed a fishbone diagram to describe contributing factors to CP deviations. RESULTS The study identified 21 children with and 13 children without MSKI-associated MDOs. Children with MDOs were more likely to have an initial C-reactive protein value > 2 mg/dL (90.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) and returned to care earlier than children without MDOs (median 2.8 days vs. 6.7 days, p = 0.004). Factors contributing to MDOs included failure to obtain screening laboratory tests, misinterpretation of laboratory values, failure to obtain orthopedic consultation, and failure to obtain definitive imaging. CONCLUSION Several recurrent deviations from an MSKI diagnostic CP were found to be associated with MDOs. Future quality improvement efforts to improve adherence to this MSKI CP may prevent MDOs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams DJ, Martin JM, Nian H, Weitkamp AO, Slagle J, Turer RW, Suresh S, Johnson J, Stassun J, Just SL, Reale C, Beebe R, Arnold DH, Antoon JW, Rixe NS, Sartori LF, Freundlich RE, Ampofo K, Pavia AT, Smith JC, Weinger MB, Zhu Y, Grijalva CG. Antibiotic clinical decision support for pneumonia in the ED: A randomized trial. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:491-501. [PMID: 37042682 PMCID: PMC10247532 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record-based clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising antibiotic stewardship strategy. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of antibiotic CDS in the pediatric emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic CDS vs. usual care for promoting guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia in the pediatric ED. DESIGN Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Encounters for children (6 months-18 years) with pneumonia presenting to two tertiary care children s hospital EDs in the United States. INTERVENTION CDS or usual care was randomly assigned during 4-week periods within each site. The CDS intervention provided antibiotic recommendations tailored to each encounter and in accordance with national guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary outcome was exclusive guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing within the first 24 h of care. Safety outcomes included time to first antibiotic order, encounter length of stay, delayed intensive care, and 3- and 7-day revisits. RESULTS 1027 encounters were included, encompassing 478 randomized to usual care and 549 to CDS. Exclusive guideline-concordant prescribing did not differ at 24 h (CDS, 51.7% vs. usual care, 53.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.94 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73, 1.20]). In pre-specified stratified analyses, CDS was associated with guideline-concordant prescribing among encounters discharged from the ED (74.9% vs. 66.0%; OR 1.53 [95% CI: 1.01, 2.33]), but not among hospitalized encounters. Mean time to first antibiotic was shorter in the CDS group (3.0 vs 3.4 h; p = .024). There were no differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Effectiveness of ED-based antibiotic CDS was greatest among those discharged from the ED. Longitudinal interventions designed to target both ED and inpatient clinicians and to address common implementation challenges may enhance the effectiveness of CDS as a stewardship tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Williams
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Judith M Martin
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hui Nian
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Asli O Weitkamp
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jason Slagle
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Srinivasan Suresh
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jakobi Johnson
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Justine Stassun
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Shari L Just
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carrie Reale
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Russ Beebe
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Donald H Arnold
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James W Antoon
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nancy S Rixe
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura F Sartori
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert E Freundlich
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Krow Ampofo
- University of Utah and Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew T Pavia
- University of Utah and Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Joshua C Smith
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew B Weinger
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Yuwei Zhu
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carlos G Grijalva
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yarahuan JKW, Flett K, Nakamura MM, Jones SB, Fine A, Hunter RB. Digital Antimicrobial Stewardship Decision Support to Improve Antimicrobial Management. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:418-427. [PMID: 36918166 PMCID: PMC10232213 DOI: 10.1055/a-2054-0270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to create a digital application to support clinicians in empiric and pathogen-directed antibiotic ordering based on local susceptibility patterns and evidence-based treatment durations, thereby promoting antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS We formed a multidisciplinary team that met bimonthly from 2017 to 2018 to design and construct a web-based antimicrobial stewardship platform called Antibiogram + . We used an iterative and agile technical development process with frequent feedback from clinicians. RESULTS Antibiogram+ is an online tool, accessible via the electronic health record and hospital intranet, which offers institutional antibiotic susceptibilities for major pathogens, recommendations for empiric antibiotic selection and treatment durations for common pediatric conditions, antimicrobial dosing and monitoring guidance, and links to other internal clinical decision support resources. The tool was accessed 11,823 times with 492 average monthly views during the first 2 years after release. Compared with use of a preexisting print antibiogram and dosing card, pediatric residents more frequently reported "often" being sure of antibiotic dosing with Antibiogram+ (58 vs. 15%, p < 0.01). Respondents also reported improved confidence in choice of antibiotic, but this finding did not reach statistical significance (55 vs. 35%, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION We report the successful development of a digital antimicrobial stewardship platform with consistent rates of access during the first 2 years following release and improved provider comfort with antibiotic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia K. W. Yarahuan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Kelly Flett
- Novant Health Eastover Pediatrics, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | - Mari M. Nakamura
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Sarah B. Jones
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Pharmacy, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Andrew Fine
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - R. Brandon Hunter
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McGonagle EA, Karavite DJ, Grundmeier RW, Schmidt SK, May LS, Cohen DM, Cruz AT, Tu SP, Bajaj L, Dayan PS, Mistry RD. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Decision Support for Pediatric Infections. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:108-118. [PMID: 36754066 PMCID: PMC9908419 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical decision support (CDS) has promise for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in the emergency department (ED). We sought to assess the usability of a newly developed automated CDS to improve guideline-adherent antibiotic prescribing for pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS We conducted comparative usability testing between an automated, prototype CDS-enhanced discharge order set and standard order set, for pediatric CAP and UTI antibiotic prescribing. After an extensive user-centered design process, the prototype CDS was integrated into the electronic health record, used passive activation, and embedded locally adapted prescribing guidelines. Participants were randomized to interact with three simulated ED scenarios of children with CAP or UTI, across both systems. Measures included task completion, decision-making and usability errors, clinical actions (order set use and correct antibiotic selection), as well as objective measures of system usability, utility, and workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). The prototype CDS was iteratively refined to optimize usability and workflow. RESULTS Usability testing in 21 ED clinical providers demonstrated that, compared to the standard order sets, providers preferred the prototype CDS, with improvements in domains such as explanations of suggested antibiotic choices (p < 0.001) and provision of additional resources on antibiotic prescription (p < 0.001). Simulated use of the CDS also led to overall improved guideline-adherent prescribing, with a 31% improvement for CAP. A trend was present toward absolute workload reduction. Using the NASA-TLX, workload scores for the current system were median 26, interquartile ranges (IQR): 11 to 41 versus median 25, and IQR: 10.5 to 39.5 for the CDS system (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION Our CDS-enhanced discharge order set for ED antibiotic prescribing was strongly preferred by users, improved the accuracy of antibiotic prescribing, and trended toward reduced provider workload. The CDS was optimized for impact on guideline-adherent antibiotic prescribing from the ED and end-user acceptability to support future evaluative trials of ED ASPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin A. McGonagle
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Dean J. Karavite
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Robert W. Grundmeier
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sarah K. Schmidt
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Larissa S. May
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California, United States
| | - Daniel M. Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Andrea T. Cruz
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Shin-Ping Tu
- Department of Medicine, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California, United States
| | - Lalit Bajaj
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Peter S. Dayan
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
| | - Rakesh D. Mistry
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Greenberg JK, Otun A, Kyaw PT, Carpenter CR, Brownson RC, Kuppermann N, Limbrick DD, Foraker RE, Yen PY. Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Decision Support Based on the KIIDS-TBI Tool for Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Intracranial Injuries. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:456-467. [PMID: 35477149 PMCID: PMC9045962 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Kids Intracranial Injury Decision Support tool for Traumatic Brain Injury (KIIDS-TBI) tool is a validated risk prediction model for managing children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) and intracranial injuries. Electronic clinical decision support (CDS) may facilitate the clinical implementation of this evidence-based guidance. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate the acceptability and usability of an electronic CDS tool for managing children with mTBI and intracranial injuries. METHODS Emergency medicine and neurosurgery physicians (10 each) from 10 hospitals in the United States were recruited to participate in usability testing of a novel CDS prototype in a simulated electronic health record environment. Testing included a think-aloud protocol, an acceptability and usability survey, and a semi-structured interview. The prototype was updated twice during testing to reflect user feedback. Usability problems recorded in the videos were categorized using content analysis. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Among the 20 participants, most worked at teaching hospitals (80%), freestanding children's hospitals (95%), and level-1 trauma centers (75%). During the two prototype updates, problems with clarity of terminology and navigating through the CDS interface were identified and corrected. Corresponding to these changes, the number of usability problems decreased from 35 in phase 1 to 8 in phase 3 and the number of mistakes made decreased from 18 (phase 1) to 2 (phase 3). Through the survey, participants found the tool easy to use (90%), useful for determining a patient's level of care (95%), and likely to improve resource use (90%) and patient safety (79%). Interview themes related to the CDS's ability to support evidence-based decision-making and improve clinical workflow proposed implementation strategies and potential pitfalls. CONCLUSION After iterative evaluation and refinement, the KIIDS-TBI CDS tool was found to be highly usable and useful for aiding the management of children with mTBI and intracranial injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob K Greenberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Ayodamola Otun
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Pyi Theim Kyaw
- McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Christopher R Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Nathan Kuppermann
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States
| | - David D Limbrick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Randi E Foraker
- Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Po-Yin Yen
- Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sittig DF, Petersen C, Downs SM, Lehmann JS, Lehmann CU. Thank You for a Successful 2021! Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:304-314. [PMID: 35263801 PMCID: PMC8906992 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dean F. Sittig
- School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Carolyn Petersen
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Stephen M. Downs
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
| | - Jenna S. Lehmann
- Applied Clinical Informatics Editorial Office, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Christoph U. Lehmann
- Applied Clinical Informatics Editorial Office, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Clinical Informatics Center, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
May L, Tran N, Ledeboer NA. Point-of-care COVID-19 testing in the emergency department: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021; 21:1333-1340. [PMID: 34758686 PMCID: PMC8631689 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.2005582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This expert review outlines current and future point-of-care technologies for the diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is responsible for causing coronavirus disease COVID-19 in the emergency department. COVID-19 first emerged in late 2019 and is responsible for a range of presentations from minor upper respiratory tract symptoms to severe pneumonia and multisystem organ failure. Among the technologies available include the gold standard of molecular point-of-care tests as well as antigen detection tests. AREAS COVERED We discuss point-of-care molecular tests including multiplex, targeted, and single plex panels as well as various antigen testing methodologies in terms of availability and performance characteristics. In addition, we focus on current testing best practices and considerations for point-of-care testing in the emergency department based on a search of the literature available in PubMed to date and a review of FDA and CDC guidance. EXPERT OPINION While there have been many advances in SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care testing, there remain challenges to implementation in the emergency department setting. A paradigm shift is needed to improve diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa May
- Davis Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Nam Tran
- Davis Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, USA
| | - Nathan A. Ledeboer
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) frameworks and methods are becoming embedded in the health informatics community. There is now broad recognition that health informatics tools must account for the diverse needs, characteristics, and abilities of end users, as well as their context of use. The objective of this review is to synthesize the current nature and scope of HF/E integration into the health informatics community. METHODS Because the focus of this synthesis is on understanding the current integration of the HF/E and health informatics research communities, we manually reviewed all manuscripts published in primary HF/E and health informatics journals during 2020. RESULTS HF/E-focused health informatics studies included in this synthesis focused heavily on EHR customizations, specifically clinical decision support customizations and customized data displays, and on mobile health innovations. While HF/E methods aimed to jointly improve end user safety, performance, and satisfaction, most HF/E-focused health informatics studies measured only end user satisfaction. CONCLUSION HF/E-focused health informatics researchers need to identify and communicate methodological standards specific to health informatics, to better synthesize findings across resource intensive HF/E-focused health informatics studies. Important gaps in the HF/E design and evaluation process should be addressed in future work, including support for technology development platforms and training programs so that health informatics designers are as diverse as end users.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Background: Design workshops offer effective methods in eliciting end-user participation from design inception to completion. Workshops unite stakeholders in the utilization of participatory methods, coalescing in the best possible creative solutions. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify design approaches whilst providing guidance to health information technology designers/researchers in devising and organizing workshops. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in five medical/library databases identifying 568 articles. The initial duplication removal resulted in 562 articles. A criteria-based screening of the title field, abstracts, and pre-full-texts reviews resulted in 72 records for full-text review. The final review resulted in 10 article exclusions. Results: 62 publications were included in the review. These studies focused on consumer facing and clinical health information technologies. The studied technologies involved both clinician and patients and encompassed an array of health conditions. Diverse workshop activities and deliverables were reported. Only seven publications reported workshop evaluation data. Discussion: This systematic review focused on workshops as a design and research activity in the health informatics domain. Our review revealed three themes: (1) There are a variety of ways of conducting design workshops; (2) Workshops are effective design and research approaches; (3) Various levels of workshop details were reported.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yan L, Reese T, Nelson SD. A Narrative Review of Clinical Decision Support for Inpatient Clinical Pharmacists. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:199-207. [PMID: 33730757 PMCID: PMC7968988 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Increasingly, pharmacists provide team-based care that impacts patient care; however, the extent of recent clinical decision support (CDS), targeted to support the evolving roles of pharmacists, is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the literature to understand the impact of clinical pharmacists using CDS. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized trials, and quasi-experimental studies which evaluated CDS tools that were developed for inpatient pharmacists as a target user. The primary outcome of our analysis was the impact of CDS on patient safety, quality use of medication, and quality of care. Outcomes were scored as positive, negative, or neutral. The secondary outcome was the proportion of CDS developed for tasks other than medication order verification. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Of 4,365 potentially relevant articles, 15 were included. Five studies were randomized controlled trials. All included studies were rated as good quality. Of the studies evaluating inpatient pharmacists using a CDS tool, four showed significantly improved quality use of medications, four showed significantly improved patient safety, and three showed significantly improved quality of care. Six studies (40%) supported expanded roles of clinical pharmacists. CONCLUSION These results suggest that CDS can support clinical inpatient pharmacists in preventing medication errors and optimizing pharmacotherapy. Moreover, an increasing number of CDS tools have been developed for pharmacists' roles outside of order verification, whereby further supporting and establishing pharmacists as leaders in safe and effective pharmacotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Yan
- University of Utah College of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Thomas Reese
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Scott D. Nelson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|