1
|
Maclaren AS, Locock L, Skea Z, Skåtun D, Wilson P. Rurality, healthcare and crises: Investigating experiences, differences, and changes to medical care for people living in rural areas. Health Place 2024; 87:103217. [PMID: 38493657 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Healthcare provision in rural areas is a global challenge, characterised by a dispersed patient population, difficulties in the recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals and a physical distance from hospital care. This research brings together both public and doctor perspectives to explore the experience of healthcare across rural Scotland, against the backdrop of contemporary crises, including a global pandemic and extreme weather events. We draw on two studies on rural healthcare provision to understand how healthcare services have been experienced, changed and might move on after periods of short- and longer-term change caused by such crises. We highlight the importance of communicating service changes to aid in setting healthcare expectations and advocate a mixed approach to the introduction of digital solutions to best balance access to services in rural areas with the challenges of digital connectivity and literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Maclaren
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK; Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB24 3UF, UK.
| | - Louise Locock
- University of Aberdeen, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.
| | - Zoë Skea
- University of Aberdeen, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.
| | - Diane Skåtun
- University of Aberdeen, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Health Economics Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Philip Wilson
- University of Aberdeen, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Centre for Rural Health, Inverness, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ulyte A, Mehrotra A, Wilcock AD, SteelFisher GK, Grabowski DC, Barnett ML. Telemedicine Visits in US Skilled Nursing Facilities. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2329895. [PMID: 37594760 PMCID: PMC10439478 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Telemedicine in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has the potential to improve access and timeliness of care. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 to 2022, telemedicine coverage expanded, but little is known about patterns of use in SNFs. Objective To describe patterns of telemedicine use in SNFs. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used 2018 to 2022 Medicare fee-for-service claims and Minimum Data Set 3.0 records to identify short- and long-term care SNF residents. Clinician visits were grouped into routine SNF visits (ie, regular primary care within SNF) and other outpatient visits (ie, with non-SNF affiliated primary and specialty care clinicians). Using a difference-in-differences approach, assessments included whether off-hours visits (measured as weekend visits), new specialist visits, psychiatrist visits, or visits for residents with limited mobility changed differentially between 2018 to 2019 and 2020 to 2021 for SNFs with high compared with low telemedicine use in 2020. Exposure Telemedicine adoption at SNF after 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Number and proportion of telemedicine SNF and outpatient visits. Results Across 15 434 SNFs and 4 463 591 residents from the period January 2019 through June 2022 (mean [SD] age, 79.7 [11.6] years; 61% female in 2020), telemedicine visits increased from 0.15% in January 2019 to February 2020 to 15% SNF visits and 25% outpatient visits in May 2020. By 2022, telemedicine dropped to 2% of SNF visits and 8% of outpatient visits. The proportion of SNFs with any telemedicine visits annually dropped from 91% in 2020 to 61% in 2022. The facilities with high telemedicine use were more likely to be rural (adjusted odds ratio vs urban, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.77 to 2.40). Psychiatry visits differentially increased in high vs low telemedicine-use SNFs (20.2% relative increase; 95% CI, 1.2% to 39.2%). In contrast, there was little change in outpatient visits for residents with limited mobility (7.2%; 95% CI, -0.1% to 14.6%) or new specialist visits (-0.7%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of SNF residents, telemedicine was rapidly adopted in early 2020 but subsequently stabilized at a low use rate that was nonetheless higher than before 2020. Higher telemedicine use in SNFs was associated with improved access to psychiatry visits in SNFs. A policy to encourage continued telemedicine use may facilitate further access to important services as the technology matures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agne Ulyte
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ateev Mehrotra
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew D. Wilcock
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gillian K. SteelFisher
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David C. Grabowski
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael L. Barnett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ford JH, Jolles SA, Heller D, Crnich C. Characteristics of telemedicine workflows in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:301. [PMID: 36991421 PMCID: PMC10052227 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09249-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of telemedicine increased dramatically in nursing homes (NHs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about the actual process of conducting a telemedicine encounter in NHs. The objective of this study was to identify and document the work processes associated with different types of telemedicine encounters conducted in NHs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
A mixed methods convergent study was utilized. The study was conducted in a convenience sample of two NHs that had newly adopted telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants included NH staff and providers involved in telemedicine encounters conducted in the study NHs. The study involved semi-structured interviews and direct observation of telemedicine encounters and post-encounter interviews with staff and providers involved in telemedicine encounters observed by research staff. The semi-structured interviews were structured using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to collect information about telemedicine workflows. A structured checklist was utilized to document steps performed during direct observations of telemedicine encounters. Information from interviews and observations informed the creation of a process map of the NH telemedicine encounter.
Results
A total of 17 individuals participated in semi-structured interviews. Fifteen unique telemedicine encounters were observed. A total of 18 post-encounter interviews with 7 unique providers (15 interviews in total) and three NH staff were performed. A 9-step process map of the telemedicine encounter, along with two microprocess maps related to encounter preparation and activities within the telemedicine encounter, were created. Six main processes were identified: encounter planning, family or healthcare authority notification, pre-encounter preparation, pre-encounter huddle, conducting the encounter, and post-encounter follow-up.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic changed the delivery of care in NHs and increased reliance on telemedicine services in these facilities. Workflow mapping using the SEIPS model revealed that the NH telemedicine encounter is a complex multi-step process and identified weaknesses related to scheduling, electronic health record interoperability, pre-encounter planning, and post-encounter information exchange, which represent opportunities to improve and enhance the telemedicine encounter process in NHs. Given public acceptance of telemedicine as a care delivery model, expanding the use of telemedicine beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for certain NH telemedicine encounters, could improve quality of care.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu J, Yun H, Unruh MA, O'Donnell EM, Katz PR, Ancker JS, Jung HY. Perspectives of Physicians with Experience in Nursing Home Care on Telehealth Use During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1722-1728. [PMID: 36913142 PMCID: PMC10010241 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08087-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite expanded access to telehealth services for Medicare beneficiaries in nursing homes (NHs) during the COVID-19 public health emergency, information on physicians' perspectives on the feasibility and challenges of telehealth provision for NH residents is lacking. OBJECTIVE To examine physicians' perspectives on the appropriateness and challenges of providing telehealth in NHs. PARTICIPANTS Medical directors or attending physicians in NHs. APPROACH We conducted 35 semistructured interviews with members of the American Medical Directors Association from January 18 through January 29, 2021. Outcomes of the thematic analysis reflected perspectives of physicians experienced in NH care on telehealth use. MAIN MEASURES The extent to which participants used telehealth in NHs, the perceived value of telehealth for NH residents, and barriers to telehealth provision. KEY RESULTS Participants included 7 (20.0%) internists, 8 (22.9%) family physicians, and 18 (51.4%) geriatricians. Five common themes emerged: (1) direct care is needed to adequately care for residents in NHs; (2) telehealth may allow physicians to reach NH residents more flexibly during offsite hours and other scenarios when physicians cannot easily reach patients; (3) NH staff and other organizational resources are critical to the success of telehealth, but staff time is a major barrier to telehealth provision; (4) appropriateness of telehealth in NHs may be limited to certain resident populations and/or services; (5) conflicting views about whether telehealth use will be sustained over time in NHs. Subthemes included the role of resident-physician relationships in facilitating telehealth and the appropriateness of telehealth for residents with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS Participants had mixed views on the effectiveness of telehealth in NHs. Staff resources to facilitate telehealth and the limitations of telehealth for NH residents were the most raised issues. These findings suggest that physicians in NHs may not view telehealth as a suitable substitute for most in-person services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiani Yu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA.
| | - Hyunkyung Yun
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA
| | - Mark A Unruh
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA
| | - Eloise M O'Donnell
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA
| | - Paul R Katz
- Department of Geriatrics, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, USA
| | - Jessica S Ancker
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Hye-Young Jung
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsiao V, Chandereng T, Huebner JA, Kunstman DT, Flood GE, Tevaarwerk AJ, Schneider DF. Telemedicine Use across Medical Specialties and Diagnoses. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:172-184. [PMID: 36858112 PMCID: PMC9977562 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1762595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic rapidly expanded telemedicine scale and scope. As telemedicine becomes routine, understanding how specialty and diagnosis combine with demographics to impact telemedicine use will aid in addressing its current limitations. OBJECTIVES To analyze the relationship between medical specialty, diagnosis, and telemedicine use, and their interplay with patient demographics in determining telemedicine usage patterns. METHODS We extracted encounter and patient data of all adults who scheduled outpatient visits from June 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 from the electronic health record of an integrated academic health system encompassing a broad range of subspecialties. Extracted variables included medical specialty, primary visit diagnosis, visit modality (video, audio, or in-person), and patient age, sex, self-reported race/ethnicity and 2013 rural-urban continuum code. Six specialties (General Surgery, Family Medicine, Gastroenterology, Oncology, General Internal Medicine, and Psychiatry) ranging from the lowest to the highest quartile of telemedicine use (video and audio) were chosen for analysis. Relative proportions of video, audio, and in-person modalities were compared. We examined diagnoses associated with the most and least frequent telemedicine use within each specialty. Finally, we analyzed associations between patient characteristics and telemedicine modality (video vs. audio/in-person, and video/audio vs. in-person) using a mixed-effects logistic regression model. RESULTS A total of 2,494,296 encounters occurred during the study period, representing 420,876 unique patients (mean age: 44 years, standard deviation: 24 years, 54% female). Medical diagnoses requiring physical examination or minor procedures were more likely to be conducted in-person. Rural patients were more likely than urban patients to use video telemedicine in General Surgery and Gastroenterology and less likely to use video for all other specialties. Within most specialties, male patients and patients of nonwhite race were overall less likely to use video modality and video/audio telemedicine. In Psychiatry, members of several demographic groups used video telemedicine more commonly than expected, while in other specialties, members of these groups tended to use less telemedicine overall. CONCLUSION Medical diagnoses requiring physical examination or minor procedures are more likely to be conducted in-person. Patient characteristics (age, sex, rural vs. urban, race/ethnicity) affect video and video/audio telemedicine use differently depending on medical specialty. These factors contribute to a unique clinical scenario which impacts perceived usefulness and accessibility of telemedicine to providers and patients, and are likely to impact rates of telemedicine adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Hsiao
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Thevaa Chandereng
- UW Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
| | - Jeffrey A. Huebner
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - David T. Kunstman
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Grace E. Flood
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Amye J. Tevaarwerk
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - David F. Schneider
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Totten AM, Womack DM, Griffin JC, McDonagh MS, Davis-O'Reilly C, Blazina I, Grusing S, Elder N. Telehealth-guided provider-to-provider communication to improve rural health: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2022:1357633X221139892. [PMID: 36567431 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x221139892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Telehealth may address healthcare disparities for rural populations. This systematic review assesses the use, effectiveness, and implementation of telehealth-supported provider-to-provider collaboration to improve rural healthcare. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 1 January 2010 to 12 October 2021 for trials and observational studies of rural provider-to-provider telehealth. Abstracts and full text were dual-reviewed. We assessed the risk of bias for individual studies and strength of evidence for studies with similar outcomes. RESULTS Seven studies of rural uptake of provider-to-provider telehealth documented increases over time but variability across geographic regions. In 97 effectiveness studies, outcomes were similar with rural provider-to-provider telehealth versus without for inpatient consultations, neonatal care, outpatient depression and diabetes, and emergency care. Better or similar results were reported for changes in rural clinician behavior, knowledge, confidence, and self-efficacy. Evidence was insufficient for other clinical uses and outcomes. Sixty-seven (67) evaluation and qualitative studies identified barriers and facilitators to implementing rural provider-to-provider telehealth. Success was linked to well-functioning technology, sufficient resources, and adequate payment. Barriers included lack of understanding of rural context and resources. Methodologic weaknesses of studies included less rigorous study designs and small samples. DISCUSSION Rural provider-to-provider telehealth produces similar or better results versus care without telehealth. Barriers to rural provider-to-provider telehealth implementation are common to practice change but include some specific to rural adaptation and adoption. Evidence gaps are partially due to studies that do not address differences in the groups compared or do not include sufficient sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dana M Womack
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ian Blazina
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sara Grusing
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nancy Elder
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Q, Li S, Liu J, Chen J. Global Trends in Nursing-Related Research on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis. Front Public Health 2022; 10:933555. [PMID: 35923953 PMCID: PMC9339968 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.933555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly impacted healthcare, especially the nursing field. This study aims to explore the current status and hot topics of nursing-related research on COVID-19 using bibliometric analysis.MethodsBetween 2019 and 2022, publications regarding nursing and COVID-19 were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection. We conducted an advanced search using the following search query string: TS = (“Novel coronavirus 2019” or “Coronavirus disease 2019” or “COVID 19” or “2019-nCOV” or “SARS-CoV-2” or “coronavirus-2”) and TS = (“nursing” or “nurse” or “nursing-care” or “midwife”). Bibliometric parameters were extracted, and Microsoft Excel 2010 and VOSviewer were utilized to identify the largest contributors, including prolific authors, institutions, countries, and journals. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to analyze the knowledge network, collaborative maps, hotspots, and trends in this field.ResultsA total of 5,267 papers were published between 2020 and 2022. The findings are as follows: the USA, China, and the UK are the top three prolific countries; the University of Toronto, the Harvard Medical School, the Johns Hopkins University, and the Huazhong University of Science & Technology are the top four most productive institutions; Gravenstein, Stefan, and White, Elizabeth M. from Brown University (USA) are the most prolific authors; The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is the most productive journal; “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “nurse,” “mental health,” “nursing home,” “nursing education,” “telemedicine,” “vaccine-related issues” are the central topics in the past 2 years.ConclusionNursing-related research on COVID-19 has gained considerable attention worldwide. In 2020, the major hot topics included “SARS-CoV-2,” “knowledge,” “information teaching,” “mental health,” “psychological problems,” and “nursing home.” In 2021 and 2022, researchers were also interested in topics such as “nursing students,” “telemedicine,” and “vaccine-related issues,” which require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhang
- Xiangya Hospital Department of Neurosurgery, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shenmei Li
- Department of Nursing, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Jing Liu
| | - Jia Chen
- Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Jia Chen
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chua CH, Seow FCL, Tang FMA, Lim LM. Factors affecting telepractice use in COVID-19. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE 2022. [PMCID: PMC8872815 DOI: 10.1177/20101058221074120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of telepractice as an alternate method of delivering healthcare to people increased significantly after COVID-19 became a global pandemic. Objectives This study aimed to identify factors contributing to the accelerated adoption of telepractice during COVID-19 in Singapore. It also sought to examine whether there are differences in the perspectives of staff in nursing facilities and caregivers in personal homes towards telepractice. Methods A cross-sectional mixed method design was used. A survey with 20 items was adapted from the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and translated into Mandarin. Anonymous responses were obtained from 70 patients and caregivers who had received speech therapy services via telepractice from a restructured hospital before and/or during Singapore’s Circuit Breaker period. Analyses were conducted using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results Sociodemographic variables of age, gender, education level and language preference did not impact user satisfaction and the likelihood of using telepractice again. Service-related factors were more influential. Participants chose to use telepractice as it saved travelling time (24.0%), was easy to use (19.3%), improved healthcare access (17.5%) and reduced waiting time (17.5%). Although all respondents expressed satisfaction in telepractice, 35.5% from personal homes and 37.5% from nursing facilities were not keen to use it again. Amongst caregivers, 26.7% from personal homes and 37.5% from nursing facilities preferred not to continue telepractice use. Technical and logistical disruptions and the lack of ‘personal touch’ were contributing factors. Conclusion Improving technological infrastructure, providing training for users and developing guidelines would help sustain telepractice as a form of service delivery beyond COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine H Chua
- Speech Therapy Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ferlin CL Seow
- Speech Therapy Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Florence MA Tang
- Speech Therapy Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Mei Lim
- Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alexander GL, Liu J, Powell KR, Stone PW. Examining Structural Disparities in U.S. Nursing Homes: A National Survey of Health Information Technology Maturity (Preprint). JMIR Aging 2022; 5:e37482. [PMID: 35998030 PMCID: PMC9449826 DOI: 10.2196/37482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are 15,632 nursing homes (NHs) in the United States. NHs continue to receive significant policy attention due to high costs and poor outcomes of care. One strategy for improving NH care is use of health information technology (HIT). A central concept of this study is HIT maturity, which is used to identify adoption trends in HIT capabilities, use and integration within resident care, clinical support, and administrative activities. This concept is guided by the Nolan stage theory, which postulates that a system such as HIT moves through a series of measurable stages. HIT maturity is an important component of the rapidly changing NH landscape, which is being affected by policies generated to protect residents, in part because of the pandemic. Objective The aim of this study is to identify structural disparities in NH HIT maturity and see if it is moderated by commonly used organizational characteristics. Methods NHs (n=6123, >20%) were randomly recruited from each state using Nursing Home Compare data. Investigators used a validated HIT maturity survey with 9 subscales including HIT capabilities, extent of HIT use, and degree of HIT integration in resident care, clinical support, and administrative activities. Each subscale had a possible HIT maturity score of 0-100. Total HIT maturity, with a possible score of 0-900, was calculated using the 9 subscales (3 x 3 matrix). Total HIT maturity scores equate 1 of 7 HIT maturity stages (stages 0-6) for each facility. Dependent variables included HIT maturity scores. We included 5 independent variables (ie, ownership, chain status, location, number of beds, and occupancy rates). Unadjusted and adjusted cumulative odds ratios were calculated using regression models. Results Our sample (n=719) had a larger proportion of smaller facilities and a smaller proportion of larger facilities than the national nursing home population. Integrated clinical support technology had the lowest HIT maturity score compared to resident care HIT capabilities. The majority (n=486, 60.7%) of NHs report stage 3 or lower with limited capabilities to communicate about care delivery outside their facility. Larger NHs in metropolitan areas had higher odds of HIT maturity. The number of certified beds and NH location were significantly associated with HIT maturity stage while ownership, chain status, and occupancy rate were not. Conclusions NH structural disparities were recognized through differences in HIT maturity stage. Structural disparities in this sample appear most evident in HIT maturity, measuring integration of clinical support technologies for laboratory, pharmacy, and radiology services. Ongoing assessments of NH structural disparities is crucial given 1.35 million Americans receive care in these facilities annually. Leaders must be willing to promote equal opportunities across the spectrum of health care services to incentivize and enhance HIT adoption to balance structural disparities and improve resident outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jianfang Liu
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kimberly R Powell
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Jefferson City, MO, United States
| | - Patricia W Stone
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|