Low-Dose Decitabine versus Low-Dose Azacitidine in Lower-Risk MDS

Treatment of Anemia in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

OPINION STATEMENT

A majority of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) will present with or develop anemia. Anemia in MDS is associated with decreased quality of life and may correlate with decreased progression-free survival and overall survival. In this state of the art review we summarize current risk stratification approaches to identify lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS), the natural history of the disease, and meaningful clinical endpoints. The treatment landscape of LR-MDS with anemia is also rapidly evolving; we review the role of supportive care, erythropoietin stimulating agents, lenalidomide, luspatercept, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in the management of LR-MDS with anemia. In patients with deletion 5q (del5q) syndrome lenalidomide has both efficacy and durability of response. For patients without del5q who need treatment, the management approach is impacted by serum erythropoietin (EPO) level, SF3B1 mutation status, and ring sideroblast status. Given the data from the Phase III COMMANDS trial, we utilize luspatercept in those with SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts that have an EPO level < 500 U/L; in patients without an SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts there is equipoise between luspatercept and use of an erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA). For patients who have an EPO level ≥ 500 U/L or have been previously treated there is not a clear standard of care. For those without previous luspatercept exposure it can be considered particularly if there is an SF3B1 mutation or the presence of ring sideroblasts. Other options include HMAs or IST; the Phase III IMERGE trial supports the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in this setting and this may become a standard option in the future as well.

Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Older Patients: Current State of Science, Challenges, and Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) represent a diverse group of pathologically distinct diseases with varying prognoses and risks of leukemia progression. This review aims to discuss current treatment options for elderly patients with MDS, focusing on patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The challenges associated with treatment in this population and emerging therapeutic prospects are also explored.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advancements in molecular diagnostics have enhanced risk stratification by incorporating genetic mutations, notably through the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M). Lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) treatment ranges from observation to supportive measures and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), with emerging therapies like luspatercept showing promise. High-risk MDS (HR-MDS) is treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or allogenic HSCT, but outcomes remain poor. Elderly MDS patients, often diagnosed after 70, pose challenges in treatment decision-making. The IPSS-M aids risk stratification, guiding therapeutic choices. For LR-MDS, supportive care, ESAs, and novel agents like luspatercept are considered. Treatment of HR-MDS involves HMAs or allogenic HSCT. Emerging treatments, including oral HMAs and novel agents targeting FLT3, and IDH 1/2 mutations, show promise. Future research should refine treatment strategies for this elderly population focusing on quality-of-life improvement.

Latest Insights and Therapeutic Advances in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs) encompass a range of hematopoietic malignancies, commonly affecting elderly individuals. Molecular alterations in the hematopoietic stem cell compartment drive disease pathogenesis. Recent advancements in genomic profiling have provided valuable insights into the biological underpinnings of MDSs and have expanded therapeutic options, particularly for specific molecularly defined subgroups. This review highlights the diagnostic principles, classification updates, prognostic stratification systems, and novel treatments, which could inform future clinical trials and enhance the management of adult MDS patients, particularly for specific molecularly defined subgroups.

Next-generation therapy for lower-risk MDS

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective clonal hematopoiesis leading to peripheral blood cytopenia and a variable risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. In lower-risk (LR) MDS, as defined by prognostic scoring systems recently updated with the addition of a mutation profile, therapeutic options aim to reduce cytopenia, mainly anemia. Although options for reducing the transfusion burden have recently been improved, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, and, more recently, luspatercept have shown efficacy in rarely more than 50% of patients with a duration of response often far inferior to the patient's life expectancy. Nevertheless, several new therapies are currently under investigation aiming at improving cytopenia in patients with LR-MDS, mostly by targeting different biological pathways. Targeting ligands of the transforming growth factor β pathway has led to the approval of luspatercept in LR-MDS with ring sideroblasts or SF3B1 mutation, potentially replacing first-line ESAs in this population. Here, we also discuss the evolving standard of care for the treatment of LR-MDS and explore some of the most promising next-generation agents under investigation.

Updates on risk stratification and management of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms

The majority of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms patients present with anemia. Historically, these patients were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), with modest responses. A subset of these patients with del(5q) may do better with lenalidomide. Recently, in randomized trials, luspatercept has shown better responses compared with ESAs in treatment-naive patients and imetelstat in patients refractory to ESAs. Other evaluated novel compounds (fostamatinib, H3B-880, roxadustat, pyruvate kinase receptor activator) have not yet shown meaningful efficacy. More needs to be done to improve outcomes; in pursuance of this, participation in clinical trials evaluating novel therapies should be encouraged. While lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms tend to have an indolent course, a subset of them has a dismal prognosis. Improving prognostication and serial monitoring will help in identifying high-risk patients for appropriate management.

Why do we not have more drugs approved for MDS? A critical viewpoint on novel drug development in MDS

Approval of new agents to treat higher risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has stalled since the approval of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi). In addition, the options for patients with lower risk (LR) MDS who have high transfusion needs and do not harbor ring sideroblasts or 5q- syndrome are limited. Here, we review the current treatment landscape in MDS and identify areas of unmet need, such as treatment after failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or DNMTis, TP53-mutated disease, and MDS with potentially targetable mutations. We discuss how our understanding of MDS pathogenesis can inform therapy development, including treating HR-MDS similarly to AML and pursuing therapies to address splicing factor mutations and dysregulated inflammation. We then bring a critical lens to current methodology of MDS studies and propose solutions to improve the efficiency and yield of these clinical trials, including using the most meaningful response metrics and expanding enrollment.

Oral therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia: a revolution in progress

INTRODUCTION

Patients with myeloid neoplasms such as myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are generally older, and many are not eligible for curative intent intensive therapies and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While lower intensity, hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapies such as azacitidine+venetoclax have improved patient outcomes significantly, responses are not durable, and most patients die from disease-related complications. The approvals of oral HMAs such as cedazuridine-decitabine (C-DEC) and oral azacitidine (CC-486) have kindled the hope that myeloid malignancies may soon be treated with total oral therapy.

AREAS COVERED

We review all-oral therapies including the approvals of C-DEC and CC-486 in MDS and AML, respectively, in addition to emerging all-oral therapies, both monotherapy and combination, in higher-risk (HR) MDS and AML.

EXPERT OPINION

Oral HMAs have the potential to be a convenient and efficacy-equivalent treatment option for patients with HR-MDS or AML and improve their quality of life by reducing clinic visits for medication administration. Total-oral therapy combinations, largely including an oral HMA 'backbone,' are in the early phases of clinical development, and it is our hope that well-designed trials employing these agents may soon allow the identification of optimal regimens that deliver effective disease-directed therapy with good tolerability.

Evolution of Therapeutic Benefit Measurement Criteria in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are heterogeneous, clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, progressive cytopenias, and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. The diversity in disease severity, morphology, and genetic landscape challenges not only novel drug development but also therapeutic response assessment. The MDS International Working Group (IWG) response criteria were first published in the year 2000 focusing on measures of blast burden reduction and hematologic recovery. Despite revision of the IWG criteria in 2006, correlation between IWG-defined responses and patient-focused outcomes, including long-term benefits, remains limited and has potentially contributed to failures of several phase III clinical trials. Several IWG 2006 criteria also lacked clear definitions leading to problems in practical applications and interobserver and intraobserver consistency of response reporting. Although the 2018 revision addressed lower-risk MDS, the most recent update in 2023 redefined responses for higher-risk MDS and has set out to provide clear definitions to enhance consistency while focusing on clinically meaningful outcomes and patient-centered responses. In this review, we analyze the evolution of the MDS response criteria, limitations, and areas of improvement.

The Management of Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes-Current Standards and Recent Advances

ABSTRACT

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic neoplasms with varied natural histories and prognoses. Specific to this review, treatment of low-risk MDS most often focuses on improving quality of life by correcting cytopenias, as opposed to urgent disease modification to avoid acute myeloid leukemia. These treatments include transfusion support with iron chelation when necessary, growth factors including novel maturation agents such as luspatercept, lenalidomide for del(5q) disease, and, increasingly, low-dose hypomethylating agents. Recent advances in the understanding of the genetic lesions that drive MDS have prompted a reassessment of how low-risk disease is defined and helped to identify a subset of low-risk MDS patients who may benefit from a more aggressive treatment paradigm, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Optimizing Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients with Comorbidities

Traditionally, the goal of AML therapy has been to induce remission through intensive chemotherapy, maintain long-term remission using consolidation therapy, and achieve higher rates of a cure by allogeneic transplantation in patients with a poor prognosis. However, for the elderly patients and those with comorbidities, the toxicity often surpasses the therapeutic benefits of intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, low-intensity therapies, such as the combination of a hypomethylating agent with venetoclax, have emerged as promising treatment options for elderly patients. Given the rise of low-intensity therapies as the leading treatment option for the elderly, it is increasingly important to consider patients' age and comorbidities when selecting a treatment option. The recently proposed comorbidity-based risk stratification for AML allows prognosis stratification not only in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, but also in those receiving low-intensity chemotherapy. Optimizing treatment intensity based on such risk stratification is anticipated to balance treatment efficacy and safety, and will ultimately improve the life expectancy for patients with AML.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment of Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

MDS is a clonal stem cell neoplasm with a spectrum from lower risk disease to short term life threatening higher risk disease. The disease risk is dictated by clinical and molecular features. Majority of MDS patients including lower risk disease unfortunately succumb from disease related complications namely cytopenia. While cytopenias may be mild early upon diagnosis and can be surveilled, ultimately treatment is required. Anemia is the hall mark of disease and most common indication to treat in lower risk MDS. Erythroid stimulating agents are used in the first line setting. Treatment can be a personalized approach as in select patient such as patients with del(5q) and those with ringed sideroblasts, lenalidomide, and luspatercept can be extremely effective respectively at improving cytopenias. Younger patients and hypoplastic MDS have also shown and improved response to immunosuppressive therapy. Hypomethylating agents can be option for patients with higher risk features or thrombocytopenia/neutropenia. Refractory cytopenias still poses frustration as options are limited and there is need to add more treatments to our armamentarium.

Can Lower-Risk MDS Achieve High Reward with Hypomethylating Agent Therapy?

Therapeutic options for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are highly risk stratified, with more toxic treatments reserved for patients at higher risk and more supportive approaches favored for those with lower-risk disease.1,2 The hypomethylating agents azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) are recommended as first-line therapy for higher-risk MDS; for lower-risk disease, the focus is primarily on treating symptomatic anemia with hematopoietic growth factors, luspatercept, or lenalidomide.

Therapeutic Advances in Immunotherapies for Hematological Malignancies

Following the success of immunotherapies such as chimeric antigen receptor transgenic T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, bispecific T-cell engager therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, further studies are underway to improve the efficacy of these immunotherapies and to reduce the complications associated with their use in combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitors and conventional chemotherapy. Studies of novel therapeutic strategies such as bispecific (tandem or dual) CAR-T, bispecific killer cell engager, trispecific killer cell engager, and dual affinity retargeting therapies are also underway. Because of these studies and the discovery of novel immunotherapeutic target molecules, the use of immunotherapy for diseases initially thought to be less promising to treat with this treatment method, such as acute myeloid leukemia and T-cell hematologic tumors, has become a reality. Thus, in this coming era of new transplantation- and chemotherapy-free treatment strategies, it is imperative for both scientists and clinicians to understand the molecular immunity of hematologic malignancies. In this review, we focus on the remarkable development of immunotherapies that could change the prognosis of hematologic diseases. We also review the molecular mechanisms, development processes, clinical efficacies, and problems of new agents.