Intramuscular lidocaine for prevention of lethal arrhythmias in the prehospitalization phase of acute myocardial infarction

Early recurrent arrhythmias after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with obstructive coronary artery disease: Analysis of the PROCAT registry

OBJECTIVE

After out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), the risk of recurrence during the early period is unclear and the indication for anti-arrhythmic treatment is debated. We assessed the incidence and predisposing factors for severe cardiac arrhythmias in this population.

DESIGN

Retrospective study in a cardiac arrest center.

SETTINGS

The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiac arrhythmias from hospital admission to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge in patients admitted after an OHCA associated with obstructive CAD. A major arrhythmia was defined as any arrhythmic event (auricular or ventricular) associated with cardiac arrest recurrence and/or severe arterial hypotension. Secondary outcomes were time from ICU admission to arrhythmia occurrence and all-cause in-ICU mortality. Risk factors for recurrence of a major arrhythmia were assessed using multivariate analysis.

PATIENTS

We included all consecutive OHCA patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) as initial rhythm associated with obstructive CAD, and who had a successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 256 patients, a major arrhythmia occurred in 29 (11.3%), within the first 24 h in 79.3% of cases and were mostly VF (44.8%). Mortality rate was significantly increased in patients with major arrhythmia recurrence (69% vs 41%; p = 0.006). Factor significantly associated with recurrence of severe arrhythmia was male gender (OR 0.32 [0.12-0.92]; p = 0.034). Treatment with prophylactic anti-arrhythmic in the ICU was not associated with a change in the risk of recurrence (OR 0.85 [0.21-3.65], p = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

An early recurrence of major arrhythmia was observed in more than 10% of post-cardiac arrest patients. These events happened mostly within the first 24 h. The interest of prophylactic anti-arrhythmic treatment remains to be evaluated in this population.

Prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease is a major public health problem affecting both developed and developing countries. Acute coronary syndromes include unstable angina and myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation (electrocardiogram sector is higher than baseline). Ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction is associated with high risk of mortality. The evidence is out of date, and considerable uncertainty remains about the effects of prophylactic use of lidocaine on all-cause mortality, in particular, in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of prophylactic lidocaine in preventing death among people with myocardial infarction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 13 April 2015), EMBASE (1947 to 13 April 2015) and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1986 to 13 April 2015). We also searched Web of Science (1970 to 13 April 2013) and handsearched the reference lists of included papers. We applied no language restriction in the search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction. We considered all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality and overall survival at 30 days after myocardial infarction as primary outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction in duplicate. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and measured statistical heterogeneity using I(2). We used a random-effects model and conducted trial sequential analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 37 randomised controlled trials involving 11,948 participants. These trials compared lidocaine versus placebo or no intervention, disopyramide, mexiletine, tocainide, propafenone, amiodarone, dimethylammonium chloride, aprindine and pirmenol. Overall, trials were underpowered and had high risk of bias. Ninety-seven per cent of trials (36/37) were conducted without an a priori sample size estimation. Ten trials were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Trials were conducted in 17 countries, and intravenous intervention was the most frequent route of administration.In trials involving participants with proven or non-proven acute myocardial infarction, lidocaine versus placebo or no intervention showed no significant differences regarding all-cause mortality (213/5879 (3.62%) vs 199/5848 (3.40%); RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.27; participants = 11727; studies = 18; I(2) = 15%); low-quality evidence), cardiac mortality (69/4184 (1.65%) vs 62/4093 (1.51%); RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.50; participants = 8277; studies = 12; I(2) = 12%; low-quality evidence) and prophylaxis of ventricular fibrillation (76/5128 (1.48%) vs 103/4987 (2.01%); RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.12; participants = 10115; studies = 16; I(2) = 18%; low-quality evidence). In terms of sinus bradycardia, lidocaine effect is imprecise compared with effects of placebo or no intervention (55/1346 (4.08%) vs 49/1203 (4.07%); RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.80; participants = 2549; studies = 8; I(2) = 21%; very low-quality evidence). In trials involving only participants with proven acute myocardial infarction, lidocaine versus placebo or no intervention showed no significant differences in all-cause mortality (148/2747 (5.39%) vs 135/2506 (5.39%); RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.30; participants = 5253; studies = 16; I(2) = 9%; low-quality evidence). No significant differences were noted between lidocaine and any other antiarrhythmic drug in terms of all-cause mortality and ventricular fibrillation. Data on overall survival 30 days after myocardial infarction were not reported. Lidocaine compared with placebo or no intervention increased risk of asystole (35/3393 (1.03%) vs 14/3443 (0.41%); RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.26; participants = 6826; studies = 4; I(2) = 0%; very low-quality evidence) and dizziness/drowsiness (74/1259 (5.88%) vs 16/1274 (1.26%); RR 3.85, 95% CI 2.29 to 6.47; participants = 2533; studies = 6; I(2) = 0%; low-quality evidence). Overall, safety data were poorly reported and adverse events may have been underestimated. Trial sequential analyses suggest that additional trials may not be needed for reliable conclusions to be drawn regarding these outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This Cochrane review found evidence of low quality to suggest that prophylactic lidocaine has very little or no effect on mortality or ventricular fibrillation in people with acute myocardial infarction. The safety profile is unclear. This conclusion is based on randomised controlled trials with high risk of bias. However (disregarding the risk of bias), trial sequential analysis suggests that additional trials may not be needed to disprove an intervention effect of 20% relative risk reduction. Smaller risk reductions might require additional higher trials.

Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

The goal of therapy for bradycardia or tachycardia is to rapidly identify and treat patients who are hemodynamically unstable or symptomatic due to the arrhythmia. Drugs or, when appropriate, pacing may be used to control unstable or symptomatic bradycardia. Cardioversion or drugs or both may be used to control unstable or symptomatic tachycardia. ACLS providers should closely monitor stable patients pending expert consultation and should be prepared to aggressively treat those with evidence of decompensation.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of benzopyran analogues bearing class III antiarrhythmic pharmacophores

We have synthesized a series of compounds combining the hydroxy-benzopyran ring of vitamin E with the methylsulfonylaminophenyl group of class III antiarrhythmic drugs, connected through tertiary amine moieties. Evaluation of the antiarrhythmic and antioxidant activity of the new compounds was carried out on isolated rat heart preparations using the non-recirculating Langendorff mode. The new analogues were present, at 10 microM concentration, during ischemia and reperfusion. Selected compounds were further studied by a conventional microelectrode method in order to get insight into their cellular mode of action. The most active compound, N-[4-[2-[[2-(3,4-dihydro-6-hydroxy-2,2,7,8-tetramethyl-2H-1-benzopyran-5-yl)ethyl] methylamine]ethyl]phenyl]methanesulfonamide (19a), reduces premature beats, prolongs QT and QRS intervals during ischemia and reperfusion, and reduces MDA content, leading to a fast recovery of the heart. In addition, it exhibits moderate class III antiarrhythmic action.

Prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction with prophylactic lidocaine

Primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) occurs with a high incidence and mortality rate with or without thrombolysis. The incidence varies from 2% to 19% depending on the definition of "primary." Primary VF in this study refers to fibrillation occurring in the absence of shock or pulmonary edema. Mortality rate, when primary VF occurs, is 2 to 4 times greater than when it does not. Prevention of VF has been impeded by the publication of the 1996 recommendations of the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology against the use of prophylactic lidocaine based on meta-analysis studies implying toxicity. This observational study of 4,254 patients with AMI reports the incidence and mortality rates of primary VF over 32 years. Of the 4,254 patients, 4,150 received prophylactic lidocaine, and 104 patients did not receive prophylactic lidocaine due to the 1996 guidelines, after which administration of prophylactic lidocaine was governed by physician choice. The incidence of primary VF was 0.5% among the 4,150 who received prophylactic lidocaine and 10% among the 104 who did not (p <0.0001). Among the 4,150 receiving prophylactic lidocaine, sinoatrial block occurred in 0.5% and complete infranodal atrial ventricular block occurred in 0.2%, all secondary to the site of infarction (concurrent serum lidocaine levels were < 4 microg/ml). Asystole was an agonal rhythm in 4%; these patients had been off lidocaine for 48 hours. Mortality rates were 10.5% in patients without primary VF and 25% in patients with VF (p <0.001). Thus, prophylactic lidocaine markedly decreased the incidence of VF in 4,150 patients with AMI to 0.5% compared with trials before and after thrombolysis (2% to 19%) and with the 104 patients in this study who did not receive prophylactic lidocaine (10%). No lidocaine-induced sinoatrial or atrial ventricular block or asystole occurred.

Bifunctional agents for reperfusion arrhythmias: Novel hybrid vitamin E/Class I antiarrhythmics

We have synthesized a series of hybrid compounds combining the pharmacophoric redox moieties of vitamin E and key features responsible for the antiarrhythmic properties of the class I antiarrhythmics procainamide and lidocaine. Procainamide analogue (2a) and lidocaine analogues (14a) and (14b) are very strong inhibitors of lipid peroxidation. All analogues tested at 100 or 30 microM enhanced the post ischemic recovery without inducing ventricular fibrillations while there was no evidence in our experiments for drug-induced pro-arrhythmia. In addition, they induced a widening of the QRS intervals. Our data suggest that the efficacy of the new compounds in preventing reperfusion arrhythmias could be attributed to their combined effects involving inhibition of free radical mediated damage coupled with antiarrhythmic properties.

VF recurrence: characteristics and patient outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Refibrillation after successful defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a frequent event. Little is known of factors that predispose to the occurrence of refibrillation. The effect of recurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) on survival is not known.

METHODS

Data of patients in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were collected in a combined first responder and paramedic programme in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Continuous recorded rhythm data of 322 patients covering the entire out-of-hospital resuscitation attempt was included in the analysis. Recurrence of VF was recorded, the patient and process characteristics were analysed in relation to the occurrence of refibrillation. The number of refibrillations was related to survival.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Of the studied patients 79% had at least one recurrence of VF, and a median number of two times 25-75%; one to four times). The median time from successful first shock to VF recurrence was 45 s (25-75%: 23-115 s). A significant inverse relation was found between the number of refibrillations and survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The recurrence of VF was independent of the underlying cardiac disorder, the time to defibrillation, the defibrillation waveform and other characteristics of the patient and the process. Anti-arrhythmics should be considered in all patients found in VF to reduce the number of recurrences.

Lidocaine-sensitive atrial tachycardia: lidocaine-sensitive, rate-related, repetitive atrial tachycardia: a new arrhythmogenic syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to report a variety of atrial tachycardia that might be caused by an unusual electrophysiologic substrate.

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of atrial tachycardias is attributed to re-entry, abnormal automaticity or triggered activity, based on their electropharmacological responses. A rate-related and lidocaine-sensitive atrial tachycardia has not been reported.

METHODS

Eight patients (3 women and 5 men, aged 14 to 60 years) with repetitive, uniform atrial tachycardias were studied. In six patients the arrhythmia had been refractory to at least three antiarrhythmic agents (class 1A and C sodium channel blockers, amiodarone, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, verapamil, digoxin). Conventional electrocardiograms, Holter recordings and B mode echocardiograms were performed in each patient. Intravenous lidocaine and verapamil were tested in the eight patients. Six patients underwent an electrophysiologic study.

RESULTS

The baseline electrocardiogram showed nearly incessant runs of atrial tachycardia in all patients. The mean atrial ectopic cycle length ranged from 376 to 502 ms. In seven patients a progressive prolongation of the cycle length from the beginning to the end of the salvos was documented. The arrhythmia was suppressed by increments of sinus node rate and by atrial pacing at cycle lengths longer than that of the atrial tachycardia. In all patients the arrhythmia was abolished by intravenous lidocaine, whereas intravenous verapamil was ineffective. Four symptomatic patients were successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation of the ectopic focus, and two patients were treated with oral mexiletine.

CONCLUSIONS

The peculiar electropharmacological responses of this arrhythmia suggest an uncommon underlying mechanism that remains to be elucidated.

Lidocaine and surgical modification reduces mortality in a rat model of cardiac failure induced by coronary artery ligation

Coronary artery ligation in the rat provides a useful experimental model of cardiac failure; however, this procedure carries with it a high mortality rate (50%). In this study, we used lidocaine (10 mg/kg, i.m.) before coronary artery ligation and 2 h after surgery to minimise the incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) that leads to sudden death in this model. We found that coronary artery ligation, using lidocaine in conjunction with a modified surgical procedure, had a mortality rate of 15%, much lower than reported in previous studies using this model. These modifications allow for the production of larger infarcts with 29% of animals having an infarct size > 50% of the epicardial surface. Infarct size in our myocardial infarction (MI) group varied between 5% and 75% of the left ventricular (LV) surface area resulting in a mean infarct size of 41.3 +/- 1.3% for the epicardial surface and 40.0 +/- 1.3% for the endocardial surface.

Modern adjunctive pharmacotherapy of myocardial infarction

During acute myocardial infarction (MI), aspirin, beta-adrenergic antagonists and oral angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be used as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy. Medications upon discharge from the hospital should include aspirin and a beta-blocker. An ACE inhibitor should also be prescribed unless the ejection fraction is > 45%. Particular indications for an ACE inhibitor are an anterior MI, congestive heart failure, ejection fraction < 45% and mitral regurgitation. beta-blockers, when given to patients treated with ACE inhibitors, appear to produce an additional benefit compared with an ACE inhibitor alone. Based on the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) and Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) trials, a statin should also be given to subjects with low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels above 125 mg/dl, independent of total cholesterol levels. Therapy should be administered in an attempt to reduce the LDL-cholesterol level to 90-100 mg/dl (2.3-2.6 mM/l). In patients with normal or low levels on initial evaluation, screening for lipid abnormalities should be deferred for 2 months since acute phase responses and passive hepatic congestion can cause spuriously normal levels. Calcium channel blockers, nitrates, lidocaine, anti-arrhythmic drugs and i.v. magnesium should not be administered routinely after acute MI and their use should be restricted to selected settings.

Evolution, mechanisms, and classification of antiarrhythmic drugs: focus on class III actions

Since the use of cinchona bark to treat heart palpitations in the 1700s, antiarrhythmic drug therapy has developed with the discovery of new compounds and the identification of ionic, cellular, and tissue mechanisms of action. Classifications have been developed that organize the large amount of information available about antiarrhythmic drugs around groups of compounds with common mechanisms of action. Despite important and well-recognized limitations, antiarrhythmic drug classification is still widely used. In particularly broad use is the system developed by Singh and Vaughan Williams in the early 1970s and subsequently modified by Singh and Hauswirth and by Harrison. This classification divides drug actions into class I for sodium-channel blockade (with subclasses IA, IB and IC), class II for adrenergic antagonism, class III for action-potential prolongation, and class IV for calcium-channel blockade. The development of class I drugs was curtailed when studies showed that potent sodium-channel blockers (particularly IC agents) can increase mortality in patients with active coronary artery disease. The emphasis in drug development shifted to class III agents, but their use has been limited by the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction associated with QT prolongation. Current research focuses on the development of new class III drugs that may have improved safety by virtue of greater selectivity of action at faster rates (like those of arrhythmia) or for atrial tissue. Alternative approaches include the modification of existing molecules (like amiodarone) to maintain positive properties while removing undesirable ones, and treatments that target development of the arrhythmia substrate instead of the final electrical product.

Prophylactic lidocaine use in acute myocardial infarction: incidence and outcomes from two international trials. The GUSTO-I and GUSTO-IIb Investigators

BACKGROUND

Early meta-analyses suggested that prophylactic lidocaine use reduces ventricular fibrillation but increases mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction. We determined the frequency and effect on clinical outcomes with its use in the thrombolytic era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 43,704 patients enrolled in GUSTO-I or GUSTO-IIb who had ST-segment elevation, underwent thrombolysis, and survived at least 1 hour after enrollment. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the risk of asystole, atrioventricular block, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia during hospitalization; for 24-hour, in-hospital, and 30-day mortality rates; and for 24-hour and 30-day mortality rates after adjustment for baseline predictors of death. In GUSTO-I and GUSTO-IIb, 16% and 3.5% of patients, respectively, received prophylactic lidocaine. They had a lower risk of death at 24 hours (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.97) and trends toward lower odds of in-hospital death (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.01) and death at 30 days (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1. 02). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, however, the odds of death were similar with or without lidocaine (OR 0.90 and 0. 97, respectively). Outside the United States, lidocaine was associated with higher incidences of all serious arrhythmias, but in US patients it conferred a lower likelihood of ventricular fibrillation and no increase in asystole, atrioventricular block, or mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic lidocaine use has decreased with the advent of thrombolysis, although its use may not be associated with increased mortality rates.

Multicenter randomized trial and a systematic overview of lidocaine in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

More than 20 randomized trials and 4 meta-analyses have been conducted on the use of prophylactic lidocaine in acute myocardial infarction (MI). The results suggest that lidocaine reduces ventricular fibrillation (VF) but increases mortality rates in acute MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with ST-elevation MI who were examined <6 hours after symptom onset (n = 903) were randomly assigned to either lidocaine or no lidocaine and to either streptokinase and heparin or heparin alone. Lidocaine was given as 4 boluses of 50 mg each every 2 minutes, then an infusion of 3 mg/min for 12 hours, then 2 mg/min for 36 hours. We compared the incidence of in-hospital death and ventricular arrhythmias. We then performed a meta-analysis of prophylactic lidocaine in acute MI that included these and prior trial results. The rates of VF and death with and without lidocaine were calculated for each trial, then odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the risk of these events overall with and without lidocaine. Patients given lidocaine in the randomized study had significantly less VF (2.0% vs 5.7% without lidocaine, P =.004) and a trend toward increased mortality rates (9.7% vs 7.0%, P =.145). Meta-analysis revealed nonsignificant trends toward reduced VF (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.47 to 1. 09) and increased mortality rates (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.36) with lidocaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Lidocaine reduces VF but may adversely affect mortality rates. The routine use of prophylactic lidocaine in acute MI is not recommended.

Emergency management of acute myocardial infarction. Focus on pharmacologic therapy

Treatment of acute myocardial infarction has evolved significantly in the past two decades. Reperfusion therapies of thrombolysis and percutaneous angioplasty are major advances that can be employed to save infarcting myocardium and reduce mortality. When reperfusion therapy is combined with the use of aspirin, beta-blockade, heparin, and nitroglycerin, the emergency management of the patient with myocardial infarction can be completed. Outcomes in patients are determined by what happens in the first few minutes to hours after onset, and any delay in diagnosis or treatment may have significant consequences. This article reviews intervention and treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction.

Usefulness of self-administration of intramuscular lidocaine in the prehospital setting for ventricular tachyarrhythmias unassociated with acute myocardial infarction (the "Shahal" experience in Israel)

We report on the experience accumulated by the subscribers of SHAHAL cardiac services who self-injected intramuscular lidocaine (using an automatic injector "LidoPen") for documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias which were not associated with an acute myocardial infarction. SHAHAL provides professional care to its subscribers who telephone a monitor center and describe their symptoms, whereupon therapeutic measures are decided upon. Patient data are stored in a central computer, and the center can dispatch mobile intensive care units. All subscribers carry a portable transtelephonic electrocardiographic transmitter and are provided with the LidoPen. Indications for self-injection were: transmission of a wide-QRS tachycardia (rate > 100 beats/min), symptomatic multiple or complex ventricular premature complexes in association with chest discomfort, and when the time of arrival of a medical team to the patient was estimated to be at least 8 to 10 minutes. Successful usage of the LidoPen was reported in 137 cases (123 patients). An additional 11 patients failed to use the injector properly. There was a success rate in abolishing rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia (27 of 76 patients) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and/or multiple and complex ventricular ectopic activity (8 of 30 patients) of 33% (total 35 of 106 patients). In another 9%, those arrhythmias were slowed markedly. The remaining 31 cases were eventually interpreted as being of supraventricular origin. No complications attributed to the use of the injector were reported and its use was found to be both feasible and effective in the prehospital setting.

Lidocaine in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Does it improve survival?

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of cardiac arrests outside hospital are caused by ventricular fibrillation. Although it is frequently used, the exact role for treatment with lidocaine in these patients remains to be determined.

AIM

To describe the proportion of patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest found in ventricular fibrillation who survived and were discharged from hospital in relation to whether they were treated with lidocaine prior to hospital admission.

PATIENTS AND TREATMENT

All the patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest found in ventricular fibrillation in Göteborg between 1980 and 1992 in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated by our emergency medical service (EMS). During the observation period, some of the EMS staff were authorized to give medication and some were not.

RESULTS

In all, 1,360 patients were found in ventricular fibrillation, with detailed information being available in 1,212 cases (89%). Lidocaine was given in 405 of these cases (33%). Among patients with sustained ventricular fibrillation, those who received lidocaine had a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) more frequently (P < 0.001) and were hospitalized alive more frequently (38% vs. 18%, P < 0.01). However, the rate of discharge from hospital did not significantly differ between the two groups. Among patients who were converted to a pulse-generating rhythm, those who received lidocaine on that indication were more frequently alive than those who did not receive such treatment (94% vs. 84%; P < 0.05). However, the rate of discharge did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In a retrospective analysis comparing patients who received lidocaine with those who did not in sustained ventricular fibrillation and after conversion to a pulse-generating rhythm, such treatment was associated with a higher rate at ROSC and hospitalization but was not associated with an increased rate of discharge from hospital.

Comparison of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

Efficacy of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating spontaneous monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was assessed in a randomized parallel study. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and those with poor hemodynamic tolerance of VT were excluded. Procainamide 10 mg/kg was given intravenously with an injection speed of 100 mg/min, and lidocaine was administered at an intravenous dose of 1.5 mg/kg in 2 minutes. Fourteen patients were randomized to lidocaine and 15 to procainamide. Termination occurred in 3 of 14 patients after lidocaine and in 12 of 15 patients after procainamide (p <0.01). Procainamide stopped 8 of 11 VTs not responding to lidocaine, and lidocaine stopped 1 of 1 not responding to procainamde. Of a total of 41 VT episodes, 4 of 15 responded to lidocaine and 20 of 26 to procainamide (p <0.01). Because of VT recurrences, 16 patients could be studied repeatedly with drugs given in the reversed order. This resulted in a total of 55 trials of 79 drug injections. Lidocaine terminated 6 of 31 VTs and procainamide 38 of 48 (p <0.001). The protocol was stopped in 4 cases because of adverse effects. A comparison of the QRS width and QT interval before and at the end of the injection revealed significant lengthening of these values after procainamide but no change after lidocaine. In conclusion, procainamide is superior to lidocaine in terminating spontaneously occurring monomorphic VT.

Clinical safety of lidocaine in patients with cocaine-associated myocardial infarction

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of lidocaine in the setting of cocaine-induced myocardial infarction (MI).

DESIGN

A retrospective, multicenter study.

SETTING

Twenty-nine university, university-affiliated, or community hospitals during a 6-year period (total of 117 cumulative hospital-years).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with cocaine-associated MI who received lidocaine in the emergency department.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients who received lidocaine in the setting of cocaine-associated MI, no patient died; exhibited bradydysrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation; or experienced seizures after administration of lidocaine (95% confidence interval, 0% to 11%).

CONCLUSION

Despite theoretical concerns that lidocaine may enhance cocaine toxicity, the use of lidocaine in patients with cocaine-associated MI was not associated with significant cardiovascular or central nervous system toxicity.

Parenteral antiarrhythmics for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

The acute management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias often includes the use of parenteral antiarrhythmics. There are a number of agents currently available for this purpose. They are used to suppress inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation, they terminate spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia, and prevent ventricular fibrillation in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction. Serious adverse reactions include proarrhythmia, hypotension, severe bradyarrhythmias, and precipitation of congestive heart failure. A comparative evaluation of intravenous antiarrhythmics is difficult due to inherent differences in the choice of agents for study, protocol design, patient population, defined endpoint, and serum drug levels. Likewise, the reported adverse reaction rates vary from 0.4% to 75%. To understand the difficulties in clinical decision-making in this problem area, particularly drug selection, we present here a review of pertinent clinical trials evaluating parenteral drug efficacy and adverse effects.

Effects of prehospital care on outcome in patients with cardiac illness

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of patients with acute cardiac illness transported by ambulance for whom prehospital care was provided by emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps) or EMTs trained in defibrillation (EMT-Ds).

DESIGN

A prospective chart review carried out over 3.5 years.

SETTING

The Hamilton-Wentworth region of Ontario, Canada, which covers 1,136 km2 and includes five receiving hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

We prospectively identified 8,720 potentially eligible patients from approximately 30,000 who presented to the ambulance service. We reviewed hospital charts to confirm eligibility. The group of 8,720 patients yielded 3,066 patients with acute cardiac illness who met all other eligibility requirements. We excluded patients in cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

Incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), length of hospital stay, and mortality were evaluated. Analysis was performed with chi 2 tests for association, linear regression, and logistic regression. Of the eligible patients who received prehospital EMS care, 783 sustained MIs. The proportions of people discharged alive with the diagnosis of MI did not differ between crew types (P = .16). Average hospital stay was 13 days in both groups for patients with the discharge diagnosis of MI; hospital stay ranged from 9 (EMT-D) to 11 days (EMT-P) for any patient with a discharge diagnosis other than MI. These values were statistically similar. The odds ratio of having had an MI after treatment by an EMT-D crew was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, .86 to 1.21) compared with that for treatment by an EMT-P crew.

CONCLUSIONS

In an urban setting with short (less than 10 minutes) average transport times, the availability of prehospital paramedic care does not affect occurrence of MI, length of hospital stay, or mortality of patients presenting to the EMS system with cardiac illness.

Evaluation of intravenous lidocaine for the termination of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease with or without healed myocardial infarction

Prospective evaluations of intravenous lidocaine as therapy for sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the absence of acute myocardial infarction are lacking. Lidocaine has been promulgated as first-line therapy in patients with VT, but studies evaluating its efficacy in the electrophysiology laboratory suggest that it has poor effects in terminating or preventing induction of VT. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of lidocaine in 3 cohorts with induced or spontaneous VT. One hundred twenty-eight patients with stable VT, occurring either spontaneously or induced at the time of electrophysiologic study either in the baseline state or at the time of pharmacologic testing, were evaluated. The response rate to lidocaine therapy as manifested by termination of VT was the primary goal of the study. Of these patients, 10 (8%) had termination of VT after lidocaine therapy. There were no significant differences in age, ejection fraction, VT cycle length, and mean dose of lidocaine between responders and 118 nonresponders. There were no serious side effects or adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, angina, or congestive heart failure). Lidocaine, although safe, is ineffective in terminating stable VT not associated with acute myocardial infarction.

Pharmacokinetic based adjustment of lidocaine antiarrhythmic schedule

Administration of lidocaine, 200 mg/day i.m. or 275 mg orally, decreased sudden death after myocardial infarct (from 20.7% to 10.3%) although such schedules are not considered adequate to guarantee efficient plasma levels. Inclusion of lidocaine in a polyethylene matrix assured a slow release and complete disappearance of known side effects. Lidocaine was administered 200 mg intramuscularly to hospitalized patients every 6 h or 275 mg oral tablets to healthy volunteers every 8 h and plasma levels evaluated. Plasma levels after oral administration to healthy volunteers showed a great variability, so that it was not possible to draw a statistically significant conclusion about the accumulation of lidocaine in a period of 1 week. In coronary artery disease patients, plasma levels slowly increased with time, but clinical signs indicated, in some cases, a much more rapid accumulation. The therapeutic efficiency at low repeated doses was explained as a consequence of a slow accumulation on the one hand and of the addition of the action of MEGX, the major metabolite of lidocaine, on the other hand.

Early out-of-hospital lidocaine administration decreases the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction

This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of early prehospital intravenous administration of lidocaine in preventing primary ventricular fibrillation (PVF) in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Sixty patients with suspected AMI, seen by the Mobile Coronary Care Unit (MCCU) of Florence, were randomly allocated at home to treatment with lidocaine (bolus i.v. of 1 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 4 mg/min) or placebo (infusion of saline at a rate of 1 mL/min), respectively. The lidocaine group (27 patients) and the control group (33 patients) were not significantly different in age, clinical condition, or time of randomization. The diagnosis of AMI was confirmed in all 60 patients during the hospital stay. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 5 patients in the control group in comparison to none in the lidocaine group (P < 0.05). Three patients experienced VF at home and were successfully resuscitated by an MCCU cardiologist. In another two patients, VF occurred during the first 4 hours after onset of symptoms. No major side effects were observed after the infusion of lidocaine. Our findings support the effectiveness of the prophylactic administration of lidocaine in preventing PVF in the prehospital phase of AMI and suggest that the drug can be safely administered in this setting by prehospital personnel.

The use of antiarrhythmics in advanced cardiac life support

Antiarrhythmic agents have been used to treat malignant ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of acute myocardial ischemia with proven efficacy for many years. Thus, it has been presumed that these agents would be efficacious for the treatment of cardiac arrest. Unfortunately, hard data supporting this contention are unavailable to date. Furthermore, some of the experimental data in this area are conflicting, especially regarding the relative effects of lidocaine and bretylium. Thus, little definitive can be said based on experimental information. In two randomized patient studies, lidocaine and bretylium performed comparably. Because of the frequent use of lidocaine and thus the familiarity of most health care professionals with its use, it makes educational sense to utilize lidocaine as the antiarrhythmic drug of first choice during the cardiac arrest sequence. Recent data suggesting that amiodarone may be efficacious in patients with recurrent arrhythmias require additional confirmation. Although antiarrhythmic agents have been shown to be effective in the treatment of malignant arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction, their use prophylactically for patients with suspected infarction (advocated in the past) has recently undergone reevaluation. It is now clear that despite a reduction in ventricular fibrillation, overall mortality may be increased. This may be because the prophylactic treatment of patients with suspected infarction includes a large number of patients not at risk for ventricular fibrillation who still may be at risk for drug toxicity. Thus, prophylactic administration of lidocaine to all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction can no longer be recommended. There are inadequate data upon which to base a recommendation concerning the use of lidocaine in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy. The group most likely to benefit from lidocaine are patients with ST segment elevation who present early after the onset of acute myocardial infarction. The use of lidocaine in this group requires additional study. At present, despite enthusiasm for the prophylactic use of magnesium for the treatment of arrhythmias, data are inadequate to support its routine administration. However, given the importance of magnesium and potassium levels in the genesis of malignant arrhythmias, their levels in plasma should be assessed, and abnormalities should be promptly corrected. The potential uses of antiarrhythmic agents during advanced cardiac life support span a remarkably diverse number of applications. For the purpose of this review, only the use of these agents during CPR and during the early hours of acute or suspected acute myocardial infarction will be considered.

Lidocaine to prevent ventricular fibrillation in the prehospital phase of suspected acute myocardial infarction: the North-Norwegian Lidocaine Intervention Trial

The efficacy of lidocaine to prevent ventricular fibrillation during the prehospital phase of suspected acute myocardial infarction was assessed 3 hours after administration in a randomized controlled trial. A total of 204 patients examined within 6 hours after onset of symptoms were included, and acute myocardial infarction was later confirmed in 63% of these. Lidocaine, administered as a 100 mg intravenous bolus dose followed by a 300 mg intramuscular injection, failed to prevent ventricular fibrillation, which was observed in 2 (2.1%) of 96 patients in the lidocaine group and in 3 (3.0%) of 101 patients in the placebo group (p = 0.95; odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 1.3). In addition, sudden cardiac collapse with unknown heart rhythm was observed in three patients who received lidocaine (3.1%) compared with none in the placebo group (p = 0.23; odds ratio 7.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 22.1). The results of this small study suggest that lidocaine, even when given in a high dose, is ineffective in preventing ventricular fibrillation when administered before hospitalization for suspected acute myocardial infarction. Prophylactic use of lidocaine in this situation may therefore not be warranted or advisable.

Influence of lidocaine on human muscle sympathetic nerve activity during programmed electrical stimulation and ventricular tachycardia

Lidocaine directly affects conduction and refractoriness of ventricular myocardium, and may also indirectly affect these electrophysiologic properties by inhibition of cardiac sympathetic nerve traffic. Both effects may play important roles in preventing ventricular arrhythmias in humans. To determine if lidocaine has a direct effect on sympathetic nerve activity, the effects of a 100 mg lidocaine bolus followed by a 2 mg/min infusion of lidocaine on muscle sympathetic nerve activity was assessed in seven patients during programmed ventricular stimulation with single extrastimuli (premature ventricular contractions [PVCs]) in sinus rhythm, and in seven patients during induced hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. During single extrastimuli, the mean (+/- SEM) area of PVC-associated bursts of sympathetic nerve activity was unaffected by lidocaine (1101 +/- 16 units pre-lidocaine versus 1075 +/- 19 units following lidocaine; p = 0.30). Likewise, the transient decrease in blood pressure with induced PVCs was similar before and after lidocaine infusion (p = 0.46). In seven patients with induced monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, tachycardia cycle length did not change after the lidocaine bolus (393 +/- 18 versus 399 +/- 17 msec; p = 0.34) but increased during lidocaine maintenance infusion (428 +/- 17 msec; p = 0.01). After induction of ventricular tachycardia, systolic pressure decreased from 150 +/- 6 to 117 +/- 9 mm Hg at 1 minute of tachycardia, to 109 +/- 6 mm Hg during the lidocaine bolus, and rebounded to 126 +/- 8 mm Hg during the lidocaine maintenance infusion (p = 0.04, bolus versus infusion).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Declining incidence of ventricular fibrillation in myocardial infarction. Implications for the prophylactic use of lidocaine

BACKGROUND

The purposes of the present investigation were 1) to track the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the control and lidocaine-treated groups in the randomized control trials (RCTs) of lidocaine prophylaxis against primary VF in acute myocardial infarction, with particular emphasis on the time frame of the randomized trial, and 2) to estimate the number of patients who must receive lidocaine currently to prevent one episode of VF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The following variables from RCTs published between 1969 and 1988 were entered into logistic regression models to predict the percent of patients developing VF: year of publication of the RCT, method of data analysis used in the RCT, route and technique of lidocaine administration, duration of monitoring for VF, and exclusion criteria before randomization (congestive heart failure/cardiogenic shock, ventricular tachycardia/VF, or bradycardia/atrioventricular block). Year of publication was a significant predictor of VF in both the control and lidocaine groups (p less than or equal to 0.002) even after adjusting for other covariates. Based on a univariate logistic regression model with year as the predictor variable, it was estimated that the incidence of primary VF in the control group fell from 4.51% in 1970 to 0.35% in 1990 and from 4.32% down to 0.11% for the lidocaine group over the same time period. Thus, about 400 patients would currently need prophylaxis with lidocaine to prevent one episode of VF.

CONCLUSIONS

Present estimates of the risk:benefit ratio of lidocaine prophylaxis should consider the low risk of VF in control patients and the large number who need lidocaine prophylaxis to prevent one episode of VF. When added to the previously reported trend toward excess mortality in lidocaine-treated patients, these data argue against the routine prophylactic use of lidocaine in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Existence of both fast and slow channel activity during the early stages of ventricular fibrillation

Although sodium channels have been reported to be inactive after 5-10 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF), their state during early VF is unknown. In 12 open-chest dogs, a floating glass microelectrode was used to record intracellular action potentials from the right ventricle during pacing and during electrically induced VF. Before any drug was administered, an initial episode of VF was continuously recorded for at least 20 seconds followed by defibrillation. Recordings were made during VF episodes after superfusion for 15 minutes around the microelectrode site by low (2.8 x 10(-5) M) and high (10(-4) M) concentrations of tetrodotoxin (TTX) in five dogs, or by low (4 microM) and high (100 microM) concentrations of verapamil in another four dogs. In three dogs, VF was induced without drugs three times to determine if the effects observed in the previous dogs were caused by the drugs or by successive episodes of VF. Ten consecutive action potentials were analyzed at the onset and after 5, 10, 15, and 20 seconds of VF. Action potential amplitude and duration during paced rhythm or VF were not changed by the local perfusion of either TTX or verapamil. In the TTX group, the maximum upstroke rate of depolarization of an action potential (Vmax) during paced rhythm was 104 +/- 14 V/sec for control cycles before any drug was given, 86 +/- 15 V/sec for the low TTX concentration, and 55 +/- 14 V/sec for the high TTX concentration (p less than 0.05 versus other two). Vmax decreased from 55 +/- 32 V/sec at the beginning of VF to 37 +/- 27 V/sec after 20 seconds of VF for predrug VF, from 39 +/- 20 V/sec to 18 +/- 11 V/sec for low-dose TTX VF, and from 18 +/- 13 V/sec to 12 +/- 7 V/sec for high-dose TTX VF (p less than 0.05 among the three groups). In the dogs receiving verapamil, VF was still inducible with Vmax not significantly different from predrug VF at the onset and after 5 or 20 seconds of VF but with Vmax smaller (p less than 0.05) for verapamil than for predrug VF after 10 or 15 seconds of VF. In three dogs, Vmax was not significantly different during three successive episodes of VF when no drug was given between the episodes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)