Effect of gradual withdrawal on the rebound sleep disorder after discontinuation of triazolam

Alliance for Sleep Clinical Practice Guideline on Switching or Deprescribing Hypnotic Medications for Insomnia

Determining the most effective insomnia medication for patients may require therapeutic trials of different medications. In addition, medication side effects, interactions with co-administered medications, and declining therapeutic efficacy can necessitate switching between different insomnia medications or deprescribing altogether. Currently, little guidance exists regarding the safest and most effective way to transition from one medication to another. Thus, we developed evidence-based guidelines to inform clinicians regarding best practices when deprescribing or transitioning between insomnia medications. Five U.S.-based sleep experts reviewed the literature involving insomnia medication deprescribing, tapering, and switching and rated the quality of evidence. They used this evidence to generate recommendations through discussion and consensus. When switching or discontinuing insomnia medications, we recommend benzodiazepine hypnotic drugs be tapered while additional CBT-I is provided. For Z-drugs zolpidem and eszopiclone (and not zaleplon), especially when prescribed at supratherapeutic doses, tapering is recommended with a 1–2-day delay in administration of the next insomnia therapy when applicable. There is no need to taper DORAs, doxepin, and ramelteon. Lastly, off-label antidepressants and antipsychotics used to treat insomnia should be gradually reduced when discontinuing. In general, offering individuals a rationale for deprescribing or switching and involving them in the decision-making process can facilitate the change and enhance treatment success.

Acute and Persistent Withdrawal Syndromes Following Discontinuation of Psychotropic Medications

Studies on psychotropic medications decrease, discontinuation, or switch have uncovered withdrawal syndromes. The present overview aimed at analyzing the literature to illustrate withdrawal after decrease, discontinuation, or switch of psychotropic medications based on the drug class (i.e., benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists, antidepressants, ketamine, antipsychotics, lithium, mood stabilizers) according to the diagnostic criteria of Chouinard and Chouinard [Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(2):63-71], which encompass new withdrawal symptoms, rebound symptoms, and persistent post-withdrawal disorders. All these drugs may induce withdrawal syndromes and rebound upon discontinuation, even with slow tapering. However, only selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and antipsychotics were consistently also associated with persistent post-withdrawal disorders and potential high severity of symptoms, including alterations of clinical course, whereas the distress associated with benzodiazepines discontinuation appears to be short-lived. As a result, the common belief that benzodiazepines should be substituted by medications that cause less dependence such as antidepressants and antipsychotics runs counter the available literature. Ketamine, and probably its derivatives, may be classified as at high risk for dependence and addiction. Because of the lag phase that has taken place between the introduction of a drug into the market and the description of withdrawal symptoms, caution is needed with the use of newer antidepressants and antipsychotics. Within medication classes, alprazolam, lorazepam, triazolam, paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluphenazine, perphenazine, clozapine, and quetiapine are more likely to induce withdrawal. The likelihood of withdrawal manifestations that may be severe and persistent should thus be taken into account in clinical practice and also in children and adolescents.

Withdrawal from benzodiazepines by initially switching to zopiclone

Withdrawal from hypnotics can produce a variety of problems, especially sleep difficulties, some of which may arise from the multiple actions of most hypnotics, thus producing a range of rebound effects. This study examined whether switching patients to a hypnotic with a narrower range of action and of a different class would reduce these problems. One hundred and thirty-four patients participated; they were randomly allocated to one of three methods of switching from “previous hypnotic” to zopiclone (a cyclopyrrolone). The methods were gap (an interval between taking the two drugs); abuttal (taking zopiclone immediately on stopping previous drug); and overlap (gradually reducing previous drug after starting zopiclone). The main findings were that zopiclone was associated with better sleep and increased alertness; the abuttal method was the best method of switching; and no serious side effects from zopiclone were reported. It was concluded that zopiclone has a useful role in benzodiazepine withdrawal, and that immediate substitution is the best method.

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Pharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Insomnia in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this guideline is to establish clinical practice recommendations for the pharmacologic treatment of chronic insomnia in adults, when such treatment is clinically indicated. Unlike previous meta-analyses, which focused on broad classes of drugs, this guideline focuses on individual drugs commonly used to treat insomnia. It includes drugs that are FDA-approved for the treatment of insomnia, as well as several drugs commonly used to treat insomnia without an FDA indication for this condition. This guideline should be used in conjunction with other AASM guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of chronic insomnia in adults.

METHODS

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of four experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence. The task force developed recommendations and assigned strengths based on the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, and patient values and preferences. Literature reviews are provided for those pharmacologic agents for which sufficient evidence was available to establish recommendations. The AASM Board of Directors approved the final recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The following recommendations are intended as a guideline for clinicians in choosing a specific pharmacological agent for treatment of chronic insomnia in adults, when such treatment is indicated. Under GRADE, a STRONG recommendation is one that clinicians should, under most circumstances, follow. A WEAK recommendation reflects a lower degree of certainty in the outcome and appropriateness of the patient-care strategy for all patients, but should not be construed as an indication of ineffectiveness. GRADE recommendation strengths do not refer to the magnitude of treatment effects in a particular patient, but rather, to the strength of evidence in published data. Downgrading the quality of evidence for these treatments is predictable in GRADE, due to the funding source for most pharmacological clinical trials and the attendant risk of publication bias; the relatively small number of eligible trials for each individual agent; and the observed heterogeneity in the data. The ultimate judgment regarding propriety of any specific care must be made by the clinician in light of the individual circumstances presented by the patient, available diagnostic tools, accessible treatment options, and resources. We suggest that clinicians use suvorexant as a treatment for sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use eszopiclone as a treatment for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use zaleplon as a treatment for sleep onset insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use zolpidem as a treatment for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use triazolam as a treatment for sleep onset insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use temazepam as a treatment for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use ramelteon as a treatment for sleep onset insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians use doxepin as a treatment for sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians not use trazodone as a treatment for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians not use tiagabine as a treatment for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians not use diphenhydramine as a treatment for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians not use melatonin as a treatment for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians not use tryptophan as a treatment for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK). We suggest that clinicians not use valerian as a treatment for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia (versus no treatment) in adults. (WEAK).

Hypnotic Dependent Insomnia in an Older Adult with Addiction-Prone Personality

Despite the proliferation of safe, effective, and cost-effective behavioral treatments of insomnia, hypnotic medication remains the most common treatment of insomnia by primary care providers. Such treatment in many cases leads to a pattern of tolerance and dependence on sleep medication, as well as difficulty discontinuing treatment and subsequent rebound insomnia. Recent research suggests promise for behavioral interventions in the treatment of hypnotic dependent insomnia. In this article, the authors report on the treatment of a particularly challenging case: an older adult with a history of addictive behavior now dependent on hypnotics. The authors demonstrate the best possible outcome: elimination of sleep medication combined with sleep improvement.

Psychological treatment of hypnotic-dependent insomnia in a primarily older adult sample

OBJECTIVE

This study tested cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in hypnotic-dependent, late middle-age and older adults with insomnia.

METHOD

Seventy volunteers age 50 and older were randomized to CBT plus drug withdrawal, placebo biofeedback (PL) plus drug withdrawal, or drug withdrawal (MED) only. The CBT and PL groups received eight, 45 min weekly treatment sessions. The drug withdrawal protocol comprised slow tapering monitored with about six biweekly, 30 min sessions. Assessment including polysomnography (PSG), sleep diaries, hypnotic consumption, daytime functioning questionnaires, and drug screens collected at baseline, posttreatment, and 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Only the CBT group showed significant sleep diary improvement, sleep onset latency significantly decreased at posttreatment. For all sleep diary measures for all groups, including MED, sleep trended to improvement from baseline to follow-up. Most PSG sleep variables did not significantly change. There were no significant between group differences in medication reduction. Compared to baseline, the three groups decreased hypnotic use at posttreatment, down 84%, and follow-up, down 66%. There was no evidence of withdrawal side-effects. Daytime functioning, including anxiety and depression, improved by posttreatment. Rigorous methodological features, including documentation of strong treatment implementation and the presence of a credible placebo, elevated the confidence due these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Gradual drug withdrawal was associated with substantial hypnotic reduction at posttreatment and follow-up, and withdrawal side-effects were absent. When supplemented with CBT, participants accrued incremental self-reported, but not PSG, sleep benefits.

Pharmacotherapy of insomnia

INTRODUCTION

Insomnia is one of the most prevalent sleep disorders in developed countries, being surpassed only by chronic sleep deprivation. Patients with insomnia tend to have an altered quality of life, impaired daytime functioning and an increased risk of work accidents and motor vehicle crashes. Insomnia is commonly associated with chronic medical conditions, metabolic illnesses and mental disorders (such as depression and anxiety), with which there is a dual, reciprocal relationship.

AREAS COVERED

This paper focuses on current pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of insomnia, particularly benzodiazepine receptor agonists, which nowadays represent the mainstay of hypnotic therapy. The melatonin receptor antagonist, ramelteon, is reviewed (an alternative for some patients with only sleep-onset difficulty), as are sedating antidepressants, which are commonly used 'off-label' to treat insomnia, despite limited efficacy data and potential significant safety concerns. Orexin (OX) antagonists are also discussed, especially those that block OX2 or both OX1 and OX2 receptors, as these are the most promising new agents for the treatment of insomnia, with encouraging results in preliminary clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Research to evaluate and formulate treatments for insomnia is often complicated by the fact that insomnia is usually of multifactorial etiology. Understanding the molecular and receptor mechanisms involved in promoting sleep in varied disorders could provide future approaches in new drug development. In the long term, more randomized controlled trials are needed to assess both short-term and long-term effects of these medications and their efficacy in comorbid diseases that affect sleep quality or quantity.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep disorders

More than 70 million people in the United States experience primary insomnia (PI) at some point in their life, resulting in an estimated $65 billion in health care costs and lost productivity. PI is therefore one of the most common health care problems in the United States. To mollify the negative effects of PI, scholars have sought to evaluate and improve treatments of this costly health care problem. A breadth of research has demonstrated that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective intervention for PI. The goal of this article is to provide an overview of CBT for PI, including evidence regarding treatment efficacy, effectiveness, and practitioner considerations.

Tackling sleeplessness: psychological treatment options for insomnia in older adults

This paper provides a broad review of the extant literature involving the treatment of sleeplessness in older adults with insomnia. First, background information (including information regarding key issues in late-life insomnia and epidemiology of late-life insomnia) pertinent to achieving a general understanding of insomnia in the elderly is presented. Next, theories of insomnia in older adults are examined and discussed in relation to treatment of insomnia in late-life. With a general knowledge base provided, empirical evidence for both pharmacological (briefly) and psychological treatment options for insomnia in late-life are summarized. Recent advances in the psychological treatment of insomnia are provided and future directions are suggested. This review is not meant to be all-inclusive; however, it is meant to provide professionals across multiple disciplines (physicians; psychologists; applied and basic researchers) with a mix of breadth and depth of knowledge related to insomnia in late-life. It is our hope that readers will see the evidence in support of psychological treatments for late-life insomnia, and the utility in continuing to investigate this treatment modality.

A comparison of the efficacy of stimulus control for medicated and nonmedicated insomniacs

A sample of 21 medicated and 20 nonmedicated insomniacs participated in a sleep medication withdrawal program that provided education about sleep medication and a gradual medication withdrawal schedule. Ten medicated participants received stimulus control treatment and the withdrawal program, and 11 medicated participants served as a control group that received only the withdrawal program. Half of the nonmedicated participants received stimulus control, and the remaining nonmedicated participants served as a wait-list control condition. Medicated participants significantly reduced sleep medication use without significant deterioration on sleep, anxiety, or depression measures from baseline to 8-week follow-up. Stimulus control participants, unlike control group participants, showed significant improvement at follow-up for total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep quality. Stimulus control participants also reported less daytime sleepiness than control participants after treatment. Nonmedicated participants exhibited a more positive response to stimulus control than medicated participants.

Treatment of insomnia. Getting to the root of sleeping problems

Insomnia may be periodic and transient, as caused by situational stress, or persistent, as caused by a chronic sleep disorder. Physicians can gain much information concerning the type, probable cause, onset, and duration of insomnia through history taking. A sleep diary may reveal helpful information, and input from the patient's sleeping partner can also be valuable. Complicating disorders, such as heart failure, prostatism, or depression, should be sought and specific treatment prescribed. Chemical dependency, too, requires appropriate treatment. These measures, institution of good sleep-hygiene practices, and behavior modification may resolve sleeplessness. The primary indication for use of hypnotic agents is transient sleep disruption caused by acute stress. When an agent is chosen, onset of action, metabolism, and side effects should be considered, especially in elderly patients. Addictive agents should not be given to patients with substance abuse problems. If insomnia persists, evaluation at a sleep-disorder center is recommended to facilitate design of an appropriate therapeutic regimen.

Perceived benefits in a behavioral-medicine insomnia program: a clinical report

PURPOSE

This clinical replication series assessed the perceived outcome of individuals with chronic insomnia who spontaneously sought treatment at a hospital behavioral-medicine insomnia program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chronic insomnia patients who were treated with a group multifactor behavioral intervention completed posttreatment (n = 102) and 6-month follow-up (n = 70) questionnaires that assessed improvement.

RESULTS

All patients reported improved sleep at posttreatment, with the majority (58%, 59) reporting significant improvement. Of sleep medication users, 91% (62/68) either eliminated or reduced medication use. At 6-month follow-up, 90% (63/70) of respondents rated improvement in sleep as either maintained or enhanced.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that patients spontaneously seeking treatment for insomnia, including sleep medication users and those with psychological comorbidity, derive significant benefit from a group multifactor behavioral intervention. Several factors, including maintenance of therapeutic gains at long-term follow-up, the average pretreatment duration of insomnia, previous unsuccessful treatment with psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and previous research, argue against nonspecific effects playing a significant role in these results.

Pharmacotherapy of insomnia: practice and prospects

Insomnia is a complex complaint which is often multifactorial in origin. Pharmacotherapy can only be an adjunct in the treatment of insomnia and hypnotics should be given on an intermittent basis for short periods of time. An overview is presented of the currently available hypnotics, of which benzodiazepines are still the most widely prescribed. New drugs which bind to specific receptor subtypes or which are partial benzodiazepine receptor agonists might overcome the disadvantages associated with chronic benzodiazepine use, but more long-term investigations are needed.

In vivo high intrinsic efficacy of triazolam: a positron emission tomography study in nonhuman primates

The triazolobenzodiazepine triazolam is a central-type benzodiazepine receptor (BZR) ligand that is widely prescribed as a hypnotic agent. Triazolam produces its effects through potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated neurotransmission. Findings reported from in vitro binding studies showed some discrepancies concerning the pharmacological characteristics of triazolam. The present study aims to characterize in vivo the biochemical properties of triazolam, i.e., cerebral pharmacokinetics, interaction with BZR, potency, and intrinsic efficacy. Triazolam was studied in living nonhuman primates using positron emission tomography. Two different studies were carried out: (a) a direct study using [11C]triazolam and (b) an indirect competition study using the radiolabeled BZR antagonist 1C]flumazenil. Results showed that, in the brain in vivo, triazolam binds specifically and competitively to the BZR. Its rapid cerebral kinetics is consistent with a hypnotic profile (maximal binding after 23 min, elimination half-life of 202 min). Triazolam is very potent in displacing [11C]flumazenil (ID50 = 28 +/- 6 micrograms/kg). Hill analysis of the displacement curve does not show obvious binding-site heterogeneity. Triazolam is 20 times more potent in displacing [11C]flumazenil and 50 times more potent in inhibiting pentylenetetrazol-induced paroxysmal activity than the full benzodiazepine agonist diazepam. Interestingly, the simultaneous use of positron emission tomography and EEG recording allowed us to show that triazolam-positive intrinsic efficacy is slightly higher (20%) than that of diazepam. An attractive hypothesis proposes that the severity of side effects of BZR ligands is proportional to their intrinsic efficacy. Therefore, our study shows that triazolam side effects, as for other benzodiazepines, may be related to its high intrinsic efficacy in vivo.

Randomized discontinuation trials: utility and efficiency

The randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) is a two-phase trial. In phase I all patients are openly treated with the medication being evaluated. In phase II, those who have responded are randomly assigned to continue the same treatment or switch to placebo. Usually, non-compliers and "adverse reactors" identified in phase I are excluded from phase II. To investigate the value of this design, we reviewed the advantages and limitations of discontinuation studies, and compared the RDT design to the classic randomized clinical trial design in terms of clinical utility and efficiency (sample size). A computer model was used to study the efficiency of the two designs under a broad range of assumptions. The RDT design is particularly useful in studying the effect of long-term, non-curative therapies, especially when the clinically important effect is relatively small, and the use of placebo should be minimized for ethical or feasibility reasons. However, its use is limited if the objective of an investigation is to estimate the magnitude of absolute treatment effects and toxic effects in the source population, or to evaluate a potentially curative treatment. Our results indicate that selecting responders prior to randomization has a very strong effect on the relative efficiency of the trial. Further improvement may be achieved by excluding non-compliers and adverse reactors. Under the assumptions tested in our model, the sample size required in phase II of an RDT was only 20-50% of that in a classic trial.

Diagnosis and treatment of outpatient insomnia by psychiatric and nonpsychiatric physicians

Insomnia is commonly encountered in general medical practice, but little is known about how primary care physicians manage this problem. We reviewed medical records describing 536 patient encounters in which either triazolam (Halcion) or flurazepam (Dalmane) was prescribed for outpatient use. Only 12% of the progress notes written by internists or surgeons contained even a remote reference to sleep, whereas 74% of psychiatrist's notes contained at least some sleep symptom documentation. In a multivariate analysis including the number of medical and psychiatric diagnoses, patient age, and physician gender, only the prescriber department was independently associated with the presence of symptom documentation. We also found that 30% of the prescriptions written by internists or surgeons were for inappropriately large quantities of these drugs (180 or more doses) compared with 6% of the prescriptions written by psychiatrists. We conclude that the evaluation of insomnia by nonpsychiatrists is often incomplete and that hypnotic drugs may be inappropriately prescribed by these physicians. Further efforts are needed to improve the management of insomnia by primary care physicians in the outpatient setting.

Rebound insomnia and newer hypnotics

The prescription of hypnotics, mostly benzodiazepines, continues at a high level. One problem with their use is rebound insomnia: upon discontinuation sleep worsens compared with pretreatment levels. Factors influencing rebound include the type of subject, the duration of action of the hypnotic, the dosage and perhaps duration of treatment. The detection of rebound requires both sleep-laboratory and clinical studies with night-by-night analyses of individual patient data. This review concentrates on the newer compounds, (quazepam and zolpidem) which act selectively on subtypes of benzodiazepine receptors or bind atypically (zopiclone). It concludes that present evidence, while limited, is consistent with claims of less rebound potential than older benzodiazepine hypnotics of equivalent duration of action. Nevertheless, further rigorous studies are essential before these claims can be totally accepted.

Rebound insomnia in normals and patients with insomnia after abrupt and tapered discontinuation

Rebound insomnia was studied in subjects, aged 25-50 years, with insomnia complaints and normal sleep, insomnia complaints and disturbed sleep, and normal sleep with no complaints (N = 21, n = 7 per group). Standard sleep recordings were collected on a baseline night and after abrupt discontinuation of 6 nights of 0.50 mg triazolam, tapered discontinuation (3 nights of 0.50 mg, 2 nights of 0.25 mg, and 1 night of 0.125 mg triazolam) and 6 nights of placebo. Significantly disturbed sleep on the discontinuation night compared to the baseline night was found. The relative degree of rebound insomnia was greater in the abrupt condition than in either the tapered or placebo conditions. The tapered condition reduced sleep time by half that of the abrupt condition which was twice the reduction found in the placebo condition. An overall (regardless of group or condition) difference in baseline versus discontinuation sleep was found, suggesting that pill discontinuation itself leads to sleep disturbance. Subjects did not differ in rebound insomnia as a function of pre-existing sleep disturbance.

Rebound insomnia and hypnotic self administration

Twenty-one (three groups of seven), men and women, 25-50 years of age were studied to determine whether or not rebound insomnia would increase the likelihood of self administering a benzodiazepine (triazolam 0.25 mg) hypnotic. The groups compared were patients with insomnia and disturbed sleep, insomnia and normal sleep, and healthy normals. Rebound insomnia, by both subjective and polysomnographic assessment, was induced. The experience of rebound insomnia did not increase the likelihood of self administering a benzodiazepine hypnotic in any of the groups. There were clear group differences in pill self administration with normals rarely and insomnia patients frequently, but not differentially (placebo versus active drug) self administering pills.

Sensitivity to triazolam in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Elderly persons frequently appear to be sensitive to the effects of many drugs that depress the central nervous system. We studied the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the benzodiazepine hypnotic agent triazolam, now the most frequently prescribed hypnotic drug in the United States.

METHODS

Twenty-six healthy young subjects (mean age, 30 years) and 21 healthy elderly subjects (mean age, 69 years) participated in a four-way crossover study. After a single-blind adaptation trial with placebo, each subject received, in random order and in double-blind fashion, single doses of placebo, 0.125 mg of triazolam, and 0.25 mg of triazolam. For 24 hours after the administration of each of the three study medications, plasma triazolam levels were determined and psychomotor performance, memory, and degree of sedation were assessed.

RESULTS

Plasma triazolam concentrations increased in proportion to the dose, but the elderly subjects had higher plasma concentrations due to reduced clearance of the drug. The degree of sedation as rated by an observer and the reduction in the subjects' performance on the digit-symbol substitution test were both greater in the elderly than in the young subjects after they were given the same doses. The relation of the plasma triazolam concentration to the degree of impairment was similar for the two groups. As part of the study, information was presented 1 1/2 hours after the administration of the drugs; the subjects' ability to recall the information 24 hours later was impaired by both doses of triazolam, and the percent decrease was similar in the young and elderly groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Triazolam caused a greater degree of sedation and greater impairment of psychomotor performance in healthy elderly persons than in young persons who received the same dose. These effects resulted from reduced clearance and higher plasma concentrations of triazolam rather than from an increased intrinsic sensitivity to the drug. On the basis of these results, the dosage of triazolam for elderly persons should be reduced on average by 50 percent.

A guide to benzodiazepine selection. Part II: Clinical aspects

To suit the specific needs of various clinical situations, selection of an appropriate benzodiazepine derivative should be based on consideration of their different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Benzodiazepine derivatives that are rapidly eliminated produce the most pronounced rebound and withdrawal syndromes. Benzodiazepines that are slowly absorbed and slowly eliminated are most appropriate for the anxious patient, since these derivatives produce a gradual and sustained anxiolytic effect. Rapidly absorbed and slowly eliminated benzodiazepines are usually more appropriate for patients with sleep disturbances, since the rapid absorption induces sleep and the slower elimination rate may induce less tolerance to the sedative effect. Rational selection of a benzodiazepine for the elderly and for the suspected drug abuser is more problematic. The relevant pharmacokinetic and clinical considerations for these users are discussed. Certain derivatives may possess pharmacodynamic properties not shared by the entire benzodiazepine class; empirical studies have suggested the existence of anti-panic properties for alprazolam and clonazepam, antidepressant properties for alprazolam, and anti-manic properties for clonazepam and possibly lorazepam.

Benzodiazepines and the elderly. A review of potential problems

This article reviews the literature describing the extent of benzodiazepine use and abuse in the elderly and specific problems attendant upon this use, Unrecognized, undocumented use and abuse of psychoactive drugs is frequent in this population and can lead to serious problems with untreated dependence and withdrawal. The elderly appear to be more sensitive to the effects of benzodiazepines, both because of changed pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with aging and because of altered postreceptor cerebral response. All problems identified with benzodiazepines such as dependence, withdrawal, and cognitive and psychomotor impairment are proportionally greater among the elderly, who can least afford these risks. Review of the literature leads to the conclusion that benzodiazepine prescribing for the elderly should be undertaken with the greatest caution and only with the recognition of all potentially disastrous effects.

Addiction to and dependence on benzodiazepines. Diagnostic confusion in clinical practice and research studies

Considerable confusion continues to surround basic concepts for abuse, addiction, tolerance, and dependence. Clinicians may be making decisions about prescribing these medications without clear definitions and distinctions. The terms are not equivalent in meaning and should not be used interchangeably in clinical application. Moreover, they may occur together or independently and are not etiologically related. Abuse is improper use outside the standard norms. Abuse implies a violation component and a control over the use of the drug. Addiction is a preoccupation with the acquisition and compulsive use of and a pattern of relapse to drugs is spite of adverse consequences. Pervasive to the criteria is a loss of control over drug use and a lack of volitional component in the drug use. In spite of problems in definitions, studies have clearly shown that abuse, addiction, tolerance, and dependence develop commonly in benzodiazepine use.

Hypnotics and sleep physiology: a consensus report. European Sleep Research Society, Committee on Hypnotics and Sleep Physiology

The effects of hypnotics on descriptive and functional aspects of electrophysiological sleep parameters are assessed in this report. Because of the arbitrary definition of some of the criteria underlying the conventional sleep stage scoring procedure, computer-aided methods of EEG analysis have become increasingly important for recording and interpreting pharmacological effects on sleep. Of particular interest are the changes of EEG slow-wave activity, since this parameter varies as a function of prior sleep and waking. Several types of interaction between hypnotics and sleep regulation are discussed, some recent pharmacological developments are highlighted, and some common problems in clinical trials are specified.

Combination therapy with carbamazepine/benzodiazepine for polydrug analgesic/depressant withdrawal

We describe the use of combination therapy with carbamazepine and benzodiazepine (BZ) for treating 4 cases of polydrug analgesic/depressant withdrawal. Carbamazepine appears to be effective in BZ withdrawal through its agonistic action on the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor. In cases where opioid abuse is suspected, analgesic nitrous oxide appears the most suitable agent to be added to this regimen, in view of its opioid properties, rapidity of action, and synergistic actions with benzodiazepines in ameliorating withdrawal from benzodiazepines and alcohol.

Cyclopyrrolones, unlike some benzodiazepines, do not induce physical dependence in mice

In a model of physical dependence in mice, treatment with cyclopyrrolones such as zopiclone and suriclone (from 4 to 400 mg/kg/day), did not modify the sensitivity of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor complex to the partial inverse agonist FG 7142 following their withdrawal, whereas sensitivity changes were observed after treatment and withdrawal from some benzodiazepines (e.g. lorazepam, diazepam, flunitrazepam and triazolam). These data suggest that, in contrast to some benzodiazepines, zopiclone and suriclone may not produce physical dependence.

Problems and pitfalls in the use of benzodiazepines in the elderly

Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed for elderly patients living in the community and for those in hospitals and institutions. Their use is more prevalent in women. Prolonged use of benzodiazepines is particularly likely in old age for the treatment not only of insomnia and anxiety, but also of a wide range of nonspecific symptoms. Long term users are likely to have multiple concomitant physical and psychological health problems. The distinction between benzodiazepine anxiolytics and hypnotics is difficult and somewhat arbitrary, since the differences between the compounds are less than their similarities, especially in respect of adverse reactions. Despite their wide therapeutic range, elderly patients are particularly prone to adverse reactions to benzodiazepines. The incidence of unwanted effects, predominantly manifestations of central nervous system depression, has been found to be significantly increased in hospitalised elderly patients, particularly in the frail elderly. Studies on unwanted effects during long term use are scarce, but there is some evidence of tolerance to side effects. However, benzodiazepines have been found to be frequently implicated in drug-associated hospital admissions. There is suggestive evidence that benzodiazepines, especially compounds with long half-lives, may contribute to the falls which are a major health problem in old age. The incidence of benzodiazepine dependence in elderly patients is unknown. The features of benzodiazepine withdrawal in the elderly may differ from those seen in young patients; withdrawal symptoms include confusion and disorientation which often does not precipitate milder reactions such as anxiety, insomnia and perceptual changes. Problems due to both adverse reactions and to benzodiazepine withdrawal may easily be overlooked in multimorbid elderly patients, particularly in those suffering from disorders of the central nervous system. There are numerous studies on benzodiazepine pharmacokinetics indicating that alterations, especially in distribution and elimination of certain compounds, occur in old age. Benzodiazepines with oxidative metabolic pathways and longer half-lives are likely to accumulate with regular administration. However, changes in pharmacodynamics may be more important to explain altered responses to benzodiazepines in the elderly. Although information on pharmacodynamics is still limited, there is convincing evidence of increased pharmacodynamic response in the elderly which may be further accentuated by disease factors. Since the variability of pharmacological response increases with age and is not always predictable, there is good reason at least to start therapy at lower doses and to titrate dosages individually. This may also be appropriate for the newer benzodiazepines, irrespective of advantageous pharmacokinetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Simultaneous modeling of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of benzodiazepines. II. Triazolam

This study compares the time course of triazolam effects on psychomotor and cognitive skills with triazolam plasma concentrations in a combined pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (sigmoid-Emax) model. Ten male subjects received a single oral dose (1 mg) of triazolam or placebo. The CNS impairment effects were measured by using computerized tracking, body sway, and digit symbol substitution tests, and triazolam plasma concentration was measured by gas chromatography. The drug-induced effect changes lagged behind the plasma drug level changes. The magnitude of the time lag was quantified by the half-time of equilibration between concentrations in the hypothetical effect compartment and the plasma triazolam levels (t 1/2 keo). Essentially the same t 1/2 keo (approximately 6 min) was found for subcritical tracking, body sway, and digit symbol substitution tests. When using the predicted drug concentrations at the effect site, the hysteresis of the plasma concentration-effect disappears, suggesting that the hysteresis is not caused by drug induced tolerance. Moreover, the model allows for estimation of the effect site concentration that causes one-half of the maximal predicted effect (EC50, approximately 5 ng/ml) which is a measure of an individual's sensitivity to triazolam. On the basis of the EC50 values of the effect measures, body sway was slightly less sensitive to triazolam than subcritical tracking and digit symbol substitution tests.

Estazolam and flurazepam: a multicenter, placebo-controlled comparative study in outpatients with insomnia

A multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of estazolam compared with flurazepam as hypnotics. Outpatients complaining of insomnia were randomized to receive either estazolam 2 mg, flurazepam 30 mg or placebo for 7 consecutive nights. The analysis of efficacy was based on the patients' daily assessments of sleep and the investigators' global evaluations. Adverse events which were considered by the investigator to be attributable to, or of unknown relationship to the test medication were analyzed. The patient subjective questionnaire indicated that estazolam and flurazepam significantly improved all parameters (P less than .05) as compared to placebo. A marked or moderate improvement in sleep was reported by 81% (58/72), 78% (63/81) and 36% (27/76) of estazolam, flurazepam, and placebo recipients, respectively. There were no significant differences in hypnotic effect between estazolam and flurazepam. All efficacy parameters of the investigators' global evaluation improved significantly more (P less than .05) for patients receiving estazolam or flurazepam (except quality of sleep) than for those receiving placebo. The percentage of patients reporting any adverse experience was greatest for flurazepam (72%), followed by estazolam (59%), and placebo (43%). Somnolence and hypokinesia were the most commonly reported adverse events. An analysis of the global evaluation of side effects showed that flurazepam had a significantly worse side effect profile than estazolam (P less than .05) or placebo (P = .001). Estazolam and flurazepam effectively, and comparably, relieved insomnia when administered for 7 nights in adult patients complaining of insomnia. Estazolam demonstrated a more favorable side effect profile than flurazepam.

The neuropsychiatric effects of aspartame in normal volunteers

Ten healthy volunteers with no history of aspartame intolerance (6 men and 4 women, aged 21-36 years) received a single dose of aspartame (15 mg/kg body weight in capsules) or matching placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover study. Eleven blood samples collected over 24 hours were analyzed for plasma glucose and amino acid concentrations. The following variables were evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dosage: changes in mood measured on visual analog scales, cognitive function determined by digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) and arithmetic test scores, and reaction time measured with a brake-pedal reaction timer. Memory was tested at 2 and 24 hours after dosage based on recall of standardized 16-item word lists. No significant differences between aspartame and placebo were found in measures of sedation, hunger, headache, reaction-time, cognition, or memory at any time during the study. Plasma phenylalanine levels were significantly higher following aspartame (P less than .01) than with placebo between 1 and 6 hours postdosage, reaching a maximum difference of +3.36 mumols/dl at 2 hours. Plasma glucose concentrations were not significantly different between aspartame and placebo. The results of this study suggest that following a single 15 mg/kg dose of aspartame, no detectable effects are observed in a group of healthy volunteers with no history of aspartame intolerance, despite significant increases in plasma phenylalanine concentrations.

Neurochemical and pharmacokinetic correlates of the clinical action of benzodiazepine hypnotic drugs

Benzodiazepine derivatives are presumed to exert their pharmacologic activity via interaction with specific molecular recognition sites, termed benzodiazepine receptors, within the brain. The various benzodiazepines used in clinical practice differ considerably in their intrinsic receptor affinity, but the qualitative character of the drug-receptor interaction is similar or identical among this class of drugs. All benzodiazepines are lipophilic (lipid-soluble) substances that relatively rapidly cross the blood-brain barrier and equilibrate with brain tissue. After equilibrium is attained, a constant brain:plasma ratio is maintained, such that plasma concentrations proportionately reflect concentrations of drug in brain. Brain concentrations are proportional to the extent of receptor occupancy, which in turn determines the acute behavioral effect. Clinical differences among benzodiazepines largely reflect differences in pharmacokinetic properties. The onset of action after single oral doses reflects the rate of absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, whereas the duration of action is determined by the rate and extent of drug distribution to peripheral tissues, as well as by the rate of elimination and clearance. During multiple dosage, long half-life drugs accumulate, with the concurrent possibility of daytime sedation. However, a benefit of long half-life drugs is that rebound insomnia on abrupt termination is unlikely. Short half-life drugs accumulate minimally and have a lower likelihood of producing daytime sedation. However, they may be more likely to produce rebound insomnia on abrupt discontinuation.

Role of hypnotic drugs in general practice

General practice physicians commonly deal with patients who report experiencing insomnia. Advances in our understanding of insomnia should result in much more effective diagnosis and therapeutic intervention for insomnia patients at the primary care level. This presentation highlights the new knowledge of insomnia pertinent to general practice physicians and discusses the rational use of hypnotic medications in primary care.

Rebound insomnia: its determinants and significance

Rebound insomnia is a sleep disturbance that occurs on discontinuation of benzodiazepine hypnotic drugs. It has been reported in both patients and healthy normal subjects and is characterized by increased wakefulness above the person's baseline levels. This article reviews that available information regarding determinants, possible mechanisms, and clinical significance of rebound insomnia. It is concluded that rebound insomnia is a disturbance of one or two nights' duration that primarily follows discontinuation of short- to intermediate-acting benzodiazepines. It occurs at high doses of a given drug, beyond which no additional hypnotic efficacy is evident. There seem to be clear individual differences in the experience of rebound insomnia, but no prospective studies have established which differences predict rebound. It is likely to be avoided by initiating treatment with the lowest effective dose and tapering the dose upon discontinuation.

Benzodiazepines: tolerance, dependence, abuse, and addiction

Many recent studies have clearly documented the development of tolerance, dependence, and addiction to benzodiazepines. In spite of these studies and reviews of the literature, confusion remains regarding the risk and benefits of the use of benzodiazepines in medical practice. The source of the confusion arises in part from the lack of clarity in the definitions of tolerance, dependence, and addiction. The distinctions among these important terms are frequently obscured in research studies and, especially, in clinical practice. In addition, the practice of separating medical from nonmedical populations in reports of benzodiazepine dependence is misleading. The overlap between medical and nonmedical benzodiazepine users is large, so that many of these individuals fall into both categories. These and other points should be considered as serious questions to the safety and freedom from dependence and addiction in any drug-using population.

Temazepam withdrawal in elderly hospitalized patients: a double blind randomised trial comparing abrupt versus gradual withdrawal

31 of 36 elderly mainly confused hospitalized patients (69-98 years) taking temazepam 10 mgs nocte for more than one month completed a double blind randomised placebo controlled trial comparing abrupt versus gradual withdrawal of temazepam. Hours of sleep were recorded for all patients during a 7 day baseline period while taking temazepam 10 mg nocte. Then the abrupt withdrawal (AW) group (n = 15) received placebo for 10 nights and the gradual withdrawal (GW) group (n = 16) received temazepam 5 mg for the first 4 nights, 2 mg for the next 4 nights and placebo for the last 2 nights. There was no significant difference in mean hours of nightly sleep during the baseline period between the AW group (5.9 +/- 1.1 SD) and GW group (5.8 +/- 1.1 SD) and between the baseline and withdrawal periods in each group (withdrawal periods, AW 5.6 +/- 1.2, GW 5.6 +/- 1.0). There was no rebound insomnia when temazepam was withdrawn either abruptly or gradually in long-term hospitalised elderly patients and may not be effective as a long-term hypnotic.

Anterograde amnesia following triazolam use in two emergency physicians

Anterograde amnesia following triazolam ingestion lasting beyond the sedative-hypnotic effect of the drug has recently been reported. Two additional cases are presented involving emergency physicians.