Preserved insulin secretion and insulin independence in recipients of islet autografts

Considerations for an Alternative Site of Islet Cell Transplantation

Islet cell transplantation has been limited most by poor graft survival. Optimizing the site of transplantation could improve clinical outcomes by minimizing required donor cells, increasing graft integration, and simplifying the transplantation and monitoring process. In this article, we review the history and significant human and animal data for clinically relevant sites, including the liver, spleen, and kidney subcapsule, and identify promising new sites for further research. While the liver was the first studied site and has been used the most in clinical practice, the majority of transplanted islets become necrotic. We review the potential causes for graft death, including the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction, exposure to immunosuppressive agents, and low oxygen tension. Significant research exists on alternative sites for islet cell transplantation, suggesting a promising future for patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Geographical variance in reporting of elective surgery for chronic pancreatitis

The selection of optimum surgical procedure from the range of reported operations for chronic pancreatitis (CP) can be difficult. The aim of this study is to explore geographical variation in reporting of elective surgery for CP. A systematic search of the literature was performed using the Scopus database for reports of five selected procedures for CP: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT), Frey pancreaticojejunostomy, thoracoscopic splanchnotomy and the Izbicki V-shaped resection. The keyword and MESH heading 'chronic pancreatitis' was used. Overall, 144 papers met inclusion criteria and were utilized for data extraction. There were 33 reports of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. Twenty-one (64%) were from Germany. There were 60 reports of TPIAT, 53 (88%) from the USA. There are only two reports of TPIAT from outwith the USA and UK. The 34 reports of the Frey pancreaticojejunostomy originate from 12 countries. There were 20 reports of thoracoscopic splanchnotomy originating from nine countries. All three reports of the Izbicki 'V' procedure are from Germany. There is geographical variation in reporting of surgery for CP. There is a need for greater standardization in the selection and reporting of surgery for patients with painful CP.

Expression of Transforming Growth Factor-β by Human Islets: Impact on Islet Viability and Function

Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is a pleotropic cytokine that promotes angiogenesis and extracellular matrix protein synthesis in addition to its immunosuppressive effects. The purpose of this study is to identify optimal conditions for in vivo expression of TGF-β1 by human islets to exploit the possible beneficial effects and minimize undesirable side effects. We transduced human islets with adenoviral vectors encoding the active form of Ad-TGF-β1 or Ad-LacZ to test the effects of TGF-β1 gene expression on islet in vivo function following their transplantation into a NOD-SCID mouse model. Islets were transduced with multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20, 10, 5, and 2.5 per islet cell. At a MOI ranging from 2.5 to 20, expression of TGF-β1 in islet supernatant persisted for 1–2 months and ranged from 153 ± 5 to 2574 ± 1299 pg/ml, respectively. Transduction with the lowest MOI (2.5) did not compromise the in vivo production of human C-peptide. We conclude that TGF-β1 expression in transplanted islets does not compromise viability and that adenoviral transduction with the TGF-β1 gene has a dose-dependent effect, with larger MOIs being deleterious. The data also indicate that in vitro culture system and the in vivo NOD-SCID model could be used successfully to evaluate the nonimmune effects of gene transduction.

Glucoregulation after Canine Islet Transplantation: Contribution of Insulin Secretory Capacity, Insulin Action, and the Entero-Insular Axis

The physiological glucoregulatory mechanisms after islet transplantation have been incompletely investigated. We studied the insulin secretory capacity (ISC) by intravenous arginine stimulation during 35-mM glucose clamps, insulin action during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps, and mixed-meal stimulation at 6-9 mo after intrasplenic islet autotransplantation in 8 dogs, as compared with 30 controls. The enteroinsular axis in the recipients was examined by infusion of porcine glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (7-36 amide) under 8.5-mM glycemic clamp conditions in order to mimic the postprandial glycemia after transplantation. The grafts comprised 25% of the native islet mass, and the ISC likewise averaged 25% of the control value. The postprandial insulin response, in contrast, had increased to 140% after transplantation—albeit with a concomitant glucose excursion to approximately 8.5 mM. Insulin action declined on average by 45% posttransplant. The ISC correlated both with the postprandial glucose excursion and insulin action in the grafted dogs. Insulin action did not correlate with the postprandial glucose excursion. Infusion of GIP had no effect, but GLP-1 nearly doubled glucose-stimulated insulin. Thus, a hyperglycemia-enhanced insulinotropic effect of GLP-1, and perhaps other gut hormones, may account for the difference in the insulin response to the intravenous and oral challenges. Because the ISC reflects the engrafted islet mass and appears to be the primary determinant of glucose tolerance, transplantation of higher islet doses should allow prolonged near-normal glucoregulation—at least, in the autotransplant setting.

Spontaneous Hypoglycemia After Islet Transplantation: The Case For Using Non-Hepatic Sites

This Perspective provides a brief history of intrahepatic alloislet and autoislet transplantation in humans and an update of the recent success rates. It also examines the important role that hypoglycemia plays in clinical outcomes. On the one hand, recurrent serious hypoglycemic episodes related to insulin therapy are a major criterion for alloislet transplantation. On the other hand, spontaneous clinical hypoglycemia, perhaps related to the accompanying Roux-en-Y procedure for total pancreatectomy, is a complication of autoislet transplantation. Complex alterations in glucagon secretion compromise counter-regulation of hypoglycemia in both situations. The glucagon response to hypoglycemia is intrinsically defective in type 1 diabetes before transplant because of the absence of physiological regulation of α-cell secretion by neighboring β-cells. Glucagon secretion from intrahepatic islets during systemic hypoglycemia is also defective, although β-cells in the graft are normally regulated by glucose and arginine. My personal perspective is that the latter is caused by intrahepatic glycogenolysis stimulated by systemic hypoglycemia with consequent increases in intrahepatic glucose flux, which incorrectly signals intrahepatic α-cells to be quiescent. This defect is liver-specific, which strongly suggests modifying the current approach to islet transplantation by placing a portion of allo- and autoislets in nonhepatic sites in addition to hepatic sites to ensure physiological glucagon secretion as a strategy to ameliorate post-transplant hypoglycemia.

Endocrine pancreas engineered using porcine islets and partial pancreatic scaffolds

OBJECTIVES

Because therapeutic options for severe diabetes are currently limited, there is a continuing need for new therapeutic strategies, especially in the field of regenerative medicine. Collaborative efforts across the fields of tissue engineering technology and islet biology may be able to create functionally engineered islets capable of restoring endocrine function in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.

METHODS

This engineered scaffold was seeded with isolated primary porcine islets via the pancreatic duct using a multi-step infusion technique. Endocrine function of perfusion-cultured islets in the native scaffold was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining of insulin and glucagon as well as by the insulin stimulation test.

RESULTS

The pancreas in this large animal could be uniformly decellularized by perfusion with trypsin and TritonX-100 via the pancreatic duct, as shown by positive staining of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. These scaffolds derived from porcine pancreas were able to maintain the cellular integrity of islets that had repopulated the parenchymal space, which is fundamental for the restoration of endocrine function. Insulin release up to four days after islet infusion was maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

This scaffold from a large animal maintained islet survival and function in the short-term, retaining the cells as a solid organ in the parenchymal space after infusion through the pancreatic duct. These results suggest that this scaffold is suitable for further fabrication of fully functional bioengineered endocrine pancreases when implanted in vivo. Therefore, it may represent a key improvement in the field of beta-cell replacement therapy. Nonetheless, the facilitation of longer-term islet survival and studies of implantation in vivo is required for successful clinical translation.

Islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes, 2015: what have we learned from alloislet and autoislet successes?

The therapeutic potential of pancreatic islet allotransplantation, in which human donor islets are used, as a treatment for type 1 diabetes (T1D) has fascinated diabetes researchers and clinicians for decades. At the same time, the therapeutic potential of total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) (in which one's own islets are used) as a preventive treatment for diabetes in patients who undergo total pancreatectomy for chronic, painful pancreatitis has received relatively less attention. This is ironic, since the latter has been much more effective than the former in terms of successful glucose management and duration of efficacy. The reasons for this disparity can be partially identified. TPIAT receives very little attention in textbooks of internal medicine and general surgery and surprisingly little print in textbooks of endocrinology and transplantation. T1D is much more predominant than TPIAT as a clinical entity. Provision of insulin or replacement of islets is mandatory and a primary goal in T1D. Provision of pain relief from chronic pancreatitis is the primary goal of total pancreatectomy in TPIAT, whereas treatment of diabetes, and certainly prevention of diabetes, has been more of a secondary consideration. Nonetheless, research developments in both fields have contributed to success in one another. In this Perspective, I will provide a brief history of islet transplantation and contrast and compare the procedures of allo- and autoislet transplantation from three major points of view 1) the procedures of islet procurement, isolation, and transplantation; 2) the role and complications of immunosuppressive drugs; and 3) the posttransplant consequences on β- as well as α-cell function.

Assessment of β-cell mass and α- and β-cell survival and function by arginine stimulation in human autologous islet recipients

We used intravenous arginine with measurements of insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon to examine β-cell and α-cell survival and function in a group of 10 chronic pancreatitis recipients 1-8 years after total pancreatectomy and autoislet transplantation. Insulin and C-peptide responses correlated robustly with the number of islets transplanted (correlation coefficients range 0.81-0.91; P < 0.01-0.001). Since a wide range of islets were transplanted, we normalized the insulin and C-peptide responses to the number of islets transplanted in each recipient for comparison with responses in normal subjects. No significant differences were observed in terms of magnitude and timing of hormone release in the two groups. Three recipients had a portion of the autoislets placed within their peritoneal cavities, which appeared to be functioning normally up to 7 years posttransplant. Glucagon responses to arginine were normally timed and normally suppressed by intravenous glucose infusion. These findings indicate that arginine stimulation testing may be a means of assessing the numbers of native islets available in autologous islet transplant candidates and is a means of following posttransplant α- and β-cell function and survival.

Nonenzymatic Cryogenic Isolation of Therapeutic Cells: Novel Approach for Enzyme-Free Isolation of Pancreatic Islets Using In Situ Cryopreservation of Islets and Concurrent Selective Freeze Destruction of Acinar Tissue

Cell-based therapies, which all involve processes for procurement and reimplantation of living cells, currently rely upon expensive, inconsistent, and even toxic enzyme digestion processes. A prime example is the preparation of isolated pancreatic islets for the treatment of type 1 diabetes by transplantation. To avoid the inherent pitfalls of these enzymatic methods, we have conceptualized an alternative approach based on the hypothesis that cryobiological techniques can be used for differential freeze destruction of the pancreas (Px) to release islets that are selectively cryopreserved in situ. Pancreata were procured from juvenile pigs using approved procedures. The concept of cryoisolation is based on differential processing of the pancreas in five stages: 1) infiltrating islets in situ preferentially with a cryoprotectant (CPA) cocktail via antegrade perfusion of the major arteries; 2) retrograde ductal infusion of water to distend the acinar; 3) freezing the entire Px solid to lt; −160°C for storage in liquid nitrogen; 4) mechanically crushing and pulverizing the frozen Px into small fragments; 5) thawing the frozen fragments, filtering, and washing to remove the CPA. Finally, the filtered effluent (cryoisolate) was stained with dithizone for identification of intact islets and with Syto 13/PI for fluorescence viability testing and glucose-stimulated insulin release assessment. As predicted, the cryoisolate contained small fragments of residual tissue comprising an amorphous mass of acinar tissue with largely intact and viable (>90%) embedded islets. Islets were typically larger (range 50–500 μm diameter) than their counterparts isolated from juvenile pigs using conventional enzyme digestion techniques. Functionally, the islets from replicate cryoisolates responded to a glucose challenge with a mean stimulation index = 3.3 ± 0.7. An enzyme-free method of islet isolation relying on in situ cryopreservation of islets with simultaneous freeze destruction of acinar tissue is feasible and proposed as a new and novel method that avoids the problems associated with conventional collagenase digestion methods.

Defective glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia after intrahepatic but not nonhepatic islet autotransplantation

Defective glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia after islet transplantation has been reported in animals and humans with type 1 diabetes. To ascertain whether this is true of islets from nondiabetic humans, subjects with autoislet transplantation in the intrahepatic site only (TP/IAT-H) or in intrahepatic plus nonhepatic (TP/IAT-H+NH) sites were studied. Glucagon responses were examined during stepped hypoglycemic clamps. Glucagon and symptom responses during hypoglycemia were virtually absent in subjects who received islets in the hepatic site only (glucagon increment over baseline = 1 ± 6, pg/mL, mean ± SE, n = 9, p = ns; symptom score = 1 ± 1, p = ns). When islets were transplanted in both intrahepatic + nonhepatic sites, glucagon and symptom responses were not significantly different than Control Subjects (TP/IAT-H + NH: glucagon increment = 54 ± 14, n = 5; symptom score = 7 ± 3; control glucagon increment = 67 ± 15, n = 5; symptom score = 8 ± 1). In contrast, glucagon responses to intravenous arginine were present in TP/IAT-H recipients (TP/IAT: glucagon response = 37 ± 8, n = 7). Transplantation of a portion of the islets into a nonhepatic site should be seriously considered in TP/IAT to avoid posttransplant abnormalities in glucagon and symptom responses to hypoglycemia.

Pancreatectomy and autologous islet transplantation for painful chronic pancreatitis: indications and outcomes

Total pancreatectomy with intrahepatic autoislet transplantation (TP/IAT) is a definitive treatment for relentlessly painful chronic pancreatitis. Pain relief is reported to be achieved in approximately 80% of patients. Overall, 30% to 40% achieve insulin independence, and 70% of recipients remain insulin independent for > 2 years, sometimes longer if > 300 000 islets are successfully transplanted. Yet, this approach to chronic pancreatitis is underemphasized in the general medical and surgical literature and vastly underused in the United States. This review emphasizes the history and metabolic outcomes of TP/IAT and considers its usefulness in the context of other, more frequently used approaches, such as operative intervention with partial pancreatectomy and/or lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (Puestow procedure), as well as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with pancreatic duct modification and stent placement. Distal pancreatectomy and Puestow procedures compromise isolation of islet mass, and adversely affect islet autotransplant outcomes. Therefore, when endoscopic measures fail to relieve pain in severe chronic pancreatitis, we recommend early intervention with TP/IAT.

The potential benefit of non-purified islets preparations for islet transplantation

Since the advent of islet transplantation, there has been a significant emphasis on the importance of islet purity despite an inevitable associated loss of islet mass during the purification process. One of the key elements of the 'Edmonton Protocol' for islet transplantation published in 2000 was an emphasis on the need for sequential transplants of highly purified islets (averaging 24% beta cell purity) and the close correlation between the numbers of islets transplanted and the success of the procedure. However, the emphasis on islet purity may warrant further consideration as auto transplantation of non-purified islets currently provides the most successful insulin independence rates within the field of islet transplantation. While the role of auto and allo immunity could contribute to the differences in the success rates it is clear that within the clinical setting, significant acinar and ductal contamination is well tolerated. However, one could go further and hypothesize that extra-insular tissue including acinar tissue, ductal tissue, peri-pancreatic lymph nodes and vascular tissue actually confer an advantage to islet survival/function and may even contribute to the insulin secreting capacity of the graft post transplant. As such this review will assess the influence of extra-insular pancreatic tissue on the results of islet transplantation based on published evidence and will also explore the possibility that non-islet pancreatic cells are capable of differentiating into a beta cell phenotype in vivo contributing to an ongoing regeneration of endocrine mass during the period following transplantation.

Impact of islet transplantation on diabetes complications and quality of life

Insulin represents a life-saving therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes but, despite appropriate treatment, it prevents only partially long-term diabetic complications, while generating fatal hypoglycemic episodes. Islet transplantation gained attention because of its safety, effectiveness, and minimal invasiveness; however it remains a procedure reserved for a selected group of patients. The introduction of the Edmonton Protocol in 2000, based on a newly designed steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol, revamped the course of islet transplantation. The main goal of islet transplantation remains insulin independence, although the effect of islet transplantation can be more comprehensively evaluated in terms of frequency of hypoglycemic episodes and impact on diabetic complications and quality of life. Islet transplantation was shown to have positive consequences on cardiovascular, renal, neurologic, and ocular diabetic complications. The proof of concept for cellular replacement therapy in diabetes has been established with islet transplantation, it only needs to be improved and rendered widely available.

Islet transplantation a decade later and strategies for filling a half-full glass

Alloislet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes enjoyed highly favorable status in the first half of the last decade but declined in favor during the second half. In this Perspective, I will briefly review the literature published in this area from 2000 to 2010 for the purposes of extracting lessons we have learned, considering whether the procedure should be deemed a partial success or a partial failure, and offering several strategies to improve alloislet transplantation outcomes in the future. In the end, I hope to strike a positive note about where this procedure is going, and how it will be applied to establish insulin independence in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation: an overview

Pain control is one of the most challenging aspects in the management of chronic pancreatitis. Total pancreatectomy can successfully relieve the intractable abdominal pain in these patients but will inevitably result in insulin-dependent diabetes. Islet autotransplantation aims to preserve, as far as possible, the insulin secretory function of the islet cell mass thereby reducing (or even removing) the requirement for exogenous insulin administration after a total pancreactomy. Despite the relatively small number of centres able to perform these procedures, there are important technical variations in the details of their approaches. The aim of this review is to provide details of the current surgical practice for total pancreatectomy combined with islet autotransplantation, and outline the potential advantages and disadvantages of the variations adopted in each centre.

Pancreatic Resection with Islet Cell Autotransplant for the Treatment of Severe Chronic Pancreatitis

Pancreatic resection can alleviate pain in properly selected patients with severe chronic pancreatitis (CP), although the apancreatic state causes “brittle” diabetes. Islet auto-transplantation (IAT) after resection can decrease diabetes-related morbidity. Twenty-six consecutive patients with CP who underwent 27 pancreatic resections with IAT from April 2005 to December 2007 were evaluated in this retrospective case control study. Data were collected by chart and operative note reviews and query of hospital databases. Subgroup analysis was performed on 21 cases of total pancreatectomy and six cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Mean age was 43.8 years and 46.2 per cent of patients were female. The most common etiology of CP was alcoholism (34.6%), followed by idiopathic causes (30.8%) and pancreatic divisum (23.1%). There was no mortality and the complication rate was 56 per cent. Islet equivalents infused and islet equivalents/gram of pancreas were 82,094 and 2,739 respectively. Mean discharge insulin dose was 10.7 units/day. Mean follow-up was 6.5 months. At 6 months, 80 per cent of patients reporting had decreased or eliminated their use of narcotic medication and all total pancreatectomy patients required insulin (mean 23 units/day). In appropriately selected patients, pancreatic resection with IAT is safe and effective for the treatment of intractable pain associated with CP.

Intrahepatic glucose flux as a mechanism for defective intrahepatic islet alpha-cell response to hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE

Glucagon responses to hypoglycemia from islets transplanted in the liver are defective. To determine whether this defect is related to intrahepatic glycogen, islets from inbred Lewis rats were transplanted into the hepatic sinus (H group), peritoneal cavity (P group), omentum (O group), and kidney capsule (K group) of recipient Lewis rats previously rendered diabetic with streptozotocin (STZ).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Glucagon responses to hypoglycemia were obtained before and after transplantation under fed conditions and after fasting for 16 h and 48 h to deplete liver glycogen.

RESULTS

Glucagon (area under the curve) responses to hypoglycemia in the H group (8,839 +/- 1,988 pg/ml per 90 min) were significantly less than in normal rats (40,777 +/- 8,192; P < 0.01). Fasting significantly decreased hepatic glycogen levels. Glucagon responses in the H group were significantly larger after fasting (fed 8,839 +/- 1,988 vs. 16-h fasting 24,715 +/- 5,210 and 48-h fasting 29,639 +/- 4,550; P < 0.01). Glucagon response in the H group decreased after refeeding (48-h fasting 29,639 +/- 4,550 vs. refed 10,276 +/- 2,750; P < 0.01). There was no difference in glucagon response to hypoglycemia between the H and the normal control group after fasting for 48 h (H 29,639 +/- 4,550 vs. control 37,632 +/- 5,335; P = NS). No intragroup differences were observed in the P, O, and K groups, or normal control and STZ groups, when comparing fed or fasting states.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that defective glucagon responses to hypoglycemia by intrahepatic islet alpha-cells is due to dominance of a suppressive signal caused by increased glucose flux and glucose levels within the liver secondary to increased glycogenolysis caused by systemic hypoglycemia.

Beta-cell replacement and regeneration: Strategies of cell-based therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Pancreatic islet transplantation has demonstrated that long-term insulin independence may be achieved in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus type 1. However, because of limited availability of islet tissue, new sources of insulin producing cells that are responsive to glucose are required. Development of pancreatic beta-cell lines from rodent or human origin has progressed slowly in recent years. Current experiments for ex vivo expansion of beta cells and in vitro differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into insulin producing beta-cell phenotypes led to promising results. Nevertheless, the cells generated to date lack important characteristics of mature beta cells and generally display reduced insulin secretion and loss of proliferative capacity. Therefore, much better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate expansion and differentiation of stem/progenitor cells is necessary. Here, we review recent advances in the identification of potential cellular sources, and the development of strategies to regenerate or fabricate insulin producing and glucose sensing cells that might enable future cell-based therapies of diabetes mellitus type 1.

The role of total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis

Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation are done for chronic pancreatitis with intractable pain when other treatment measures have failed, allowing insulin secretory capacity to be preserved, minimizing or preventing diabetes, while at the same time removing the root cause of the pain. Since the first case in 1977, several series have been published. Pain relief is obtained in most patients, and insulin independence preserved long term in about a third, with another third having sufficient beta cell function so that the surgical diabetes is mild. Islet autotransplantation has been done with partial or total pancreatectomy for benign and premalignant conditions. Islet autotransplantation should be used more widely to preserve beta cell mass in major pancreatic resections.

Healthy twin birth after autologous islet transplantation in a pancreatectomized patient due to a benign tumor

OBJECTIVE

Autologous islet transplantation has been reported to show favorable outcomes on glucose metabolism. The objective of this study was to describe successful delivery of twins in an islet recipient who had undergone distal pancreatectomy.

PATIENT

A 35-year-old woman who underwent distal pancreatectomy owing to a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm received an autologous islet transplantation (140,000 islet equivalents). After 2.5 years, she unexpectedly became pregnant. Cesarean section was performed at 35 weeks delivering male twins without complications. Plasma glucose and insulin levels, insulinogenic index, and hemoglobin A1c were measured from the preoperative to the postpartum state as the main outcome.

RESULTS

The patient showed impaired glucose tolerance before pancreatectomy, but improved to a normal glucose tolerance after transplantation, maintaining euglycemia until pregnancy. Because her fasting glucose levels were within the normal range during pregnancy, fasting insulin represented insulin resistance. Her fasting insulin levels abruptly increased in the third trimester of pregnancy, but returned after delivery. Insulinogenic index increased over 1 year after transplantation, but gradually decreased thereafter. During pregnancy, it increased again, but could not compensate for the insulin resistance. Therefore, gestational diabetes mellitus developed: glucose homeostasis recovered to normal after delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The current report suggested a successful pregnancy after autologous islet transplantation that did not itself permanently deteriorate graft function.

Islet cell transplantation

People with type 1 diabetes have normal exocrine pancreatic function, making islet cell rather than whole organ transplantation an attractive option. Achieving insulin independence in type 1 diabetes was the perceived goal of islet cell transplantation. The success of the Edmonton group in achieving this in a selected group of type 1 patients has led to renewed optimism that this treatment could eventually replace whole organ pancreas transplantation. However the long-term results of this treatment indicate that insulin independence is lost with time in a significant proportion of patients, although they may retain glycaemic stability. In this context, the indications for islet cell transplantation, which have evolved over the last 5 years, indicate that the patients who benefit most are those who experience severe hypoglycaemic reactions despite optimal insulin therapy. This review will summarise the history of islet cell transplantation, islet isolation techniques, the transplant procedure, immunosuppressive therapy, indications for islet cell transplantation, current clinical trials, the early UK islet cell transplant experience using the Edmonton protocol, and some of the challenges that lie ahead.

Estado actual del trasplante de islotes pancreáticos

Due to the numerous advances in islet transplantation in the last few years, clinical outcomes following this procedure are continually improving. Novel immunosuppression protocols, improved donor and recipient selection, and careful attention to the process of organ extraction, preservation and islet isolation have contributed to long-term success. The present article reviews the results of clinical islet transplantation and their relationship with the different advances introduced. The use of new islet sources such as living and non-heart-beating donors, as well as recent advances in our knowledge of the mechanisms of rejection and its prevention, are also reviewed.

Islet cell transplantation today

INTRODUCTION

Long-term studies strongly suggest that tight control of blood glucose can prevent the development and retard the progression of chronic complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. In contrast to conventional insulin treatment, replacement of a patient's islets of Langerhans either by pancreas organ transplantation or by isolated islet transplantation is the only treatment to achieve a constant normoglycemic state and avoiding hypoglycemic episodes, a typical adverse event of multiple daily insulin injections. However, the cost of this benefit is still the need for immunosuppressive treatment of the recipient with all its potential risks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Islet cell transplantation offers the advantage of being performed as a minimally invasive procedure in which islets can be perfused percutaneously into the liver via the portal vein. Between January 1990 and December 2004, 458 pancreatic islet transplants worldwide have been reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) at our Third Medical Department, University of Giessen/Germany.

RESULTS

Data analysis of islet cell transplants performed in the last 5 years (1999-2004) shows at 1 year after adult islet transplantation a patient survival rate of 97%, a functioning islet graft in 82% of the cases, whereas insulin independence was meanwhile achieved in 43% of the cases. However, using a novel protocol established by the Edmonton Center/Canada, the insulin independence rates have improved significantly reaching meanwhile a 50-80% level.

CONCLUSION

Finally, the concept of islet cell or stem cell transplantation is most attractive, as it offers many perspectives: islet cell availability could become unlimited and islet or stem cells my be transplanted without life-long immunosuppressive treatment of the recipient, just to mention two of them.

Acute insulin response (AIR): review of protocols and clinical interest in islet transplantation

Various stimuli have been used in clinical practice to test islet function, including intravenous glucose, arginine--both at basal glucose levels and with the hyperglycaemic clamp, tolbutamide, glucagon and glucagon-like peptide 1. The subsequent first phase insulin response (also termed acute insulin response or AIR) to intravenous glucose or arginine has been quantified in a variety of ways, from the mean serum insulin measured at multiple times after glucose injection to the mean value above baseline of serum insulin at 2 to 10 min. The purpose of this study was to review the different protocols of AIR calculation and their pitfalls, and to assess the results of AIR in the islet transplantation field. By investigating the first phase of insulin secretion, AIR provides both a qualitative and a quantitative approach to insulin secretion. In islet transplantation, post-glucose AIR (AIRg) may predict graft survival while post-arginine AIR (AIRa) may be better correlated with engrafted beta cell mass, despite these facts need to be confirmed. AIRa also limits intravenous hyperglycaemia glucotoxicity. In conclusion, AIR could help to predict the need for a second or third islet injection in islet transplantation. These specific indications, however, need to be confirmed by future studies and completed by other approaches such as insulin sensitivity studies and in vivo morphological assessment of islet mass.

Advances in pancreatic islet transplantation in humans

With recent advances in methods of islet isolation and the introduction of more potent and less diabetogenic immunosuppressive therapies, islet transplantation has progressed from research to clinical reality. Presently, several international centres have demonstrated successful clinical outcomes with high rates of insulin independence after islet transplantation. Ongoing refinements in donor pancreas procurement and processing, developments in islet isolation and purification technology, and advances in novel immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to the acceptance of islet transplantation as a safe and effective therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. This review provides a historical perspective of islet transplantation, outlines the recent advances and current clinical outcomes, and addresses the present challenges and future directions in clinical islet transplantation.

Factors associated with insulin and narcotic independence after islet autotransplantation in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

For patients who suffer from severe chronic pancreatitis, total pancreatectomy can alleviate pain, and islet autotransplantation (IAT) might preserve endocrine function and circumvent the complications of diabetes. Factors that determine success after this operation have not been clearly defined.

STUDY DESIGN

From 2000 to 2004, 45 total or subtotal pancreatectomies with IAT were performed. Patient characteristics, narcotic usage and insulin requirements were recorded at routine followup. Narcotic usage was standardized by conversion to morphine equivalents (MEs). Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to determine factors associated with insulin and narcotic independence.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (30 women, 15 men), with a mean age of 39 years (range 16 to 62 years) underwent total or completion (n=41) or subtotal (n=4) pancreatectomies with IAT. Forty percent of patients were insulin free after a mean followup of 18months (range 1 to 46months). Factors associated in univariate analyses with insulin independence included female gender (p=0.004), lower body weight (kg) (p=0.04), more islet equivalents per kg body weight (IEQ/kg) transfused (<0.05), lower mean insulin requirement for the first 24hours postoperation (p=0.002), and lower mean insulin requirement at discharge (p=0.0005). A multiple logistic regression using gender, body mass index, and IEQ/kg identified female gender as the only notable variable associated with insulin independence. There was a notable reduction (p < 0.0001) of postoperative MEs (mean 90 mg) compared with preoperative MEs (mean 206 mg) for the entire cohort; 58% of patients are narcotic independent. In the subset of patients with>5months followup (n=32), 23 (72%) are narcotic free, with a substantial decrease in ME usage (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of glycemic control after IAT is related to both patient characteristics and islet cell mass. Based on these data, more islet cells may be required for insulin independence than previously thought.

Pancreas and islet transplants for patients with diabetes: taking positions and making decisions

OBJECTIVE

To help endocrinologists develop a position and then make decisions about the applicability of pancreas and islet transplantations for treatment of patients with diabetes.

METHODS

An overview is provided of peer-reviewed literature reporting clinical outcomes of pancreas and islet transplantations, emphasizing rates of success, effect on metabolic regulation and secondary complications, and changes in the quality of life.

RESULTS

Pancreas transplantation-related patient survival rates correspond generally to survival rates of similar patients who have not undergone transplantation, and organ survival rates are consistent with rates of other commonly transplanted organs. Beneficial effects include normalization of glycemia; restoration of glucagon, epinephrine, and symptom responses to hypoglycemia; stabilization of renal and neural complications; and improvement in the quality of life. Autoislet transplantation is commonly successful in preventing diabetes attributable to pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis. The success rates associated with alloislet transplantation remain low.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplantation is a therapeutic, not an experimental, option that should be considered when patients with diabetes are candidates for kidney transplantation or when they are metabolically unstable despite optimal medical management. Autoislet transplantation is a therapeutic option that should be seriously considered for patients without diabetes destined to undergo pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Alloislet transplantation remains an experimental procedure for treatment of diabetes.

Tolerance induction and endogenous regeneration of pancreatic beta-cells in established autoimmune diabetes

Studies aimed at the understanding of the multifactorial development of autoimmune diabetes have made substantial contributions toward elucidating the molecular mechanisms that open the road to an effective prevention of defective immune responses. Immunomodulatory regimens capable of inducing tolerance are shown to be effective even in the reversal of established autoimmune diabetes in animal models. Experimental trials including the reeducation of autoreactive T cells, depletion of macrophages, dendritic cells, and T cells, as well as the use of monoclonal antibodies, have yielded encouraging results, but have not yet been translated into beneficial clinical outcomes. In addition, we are now seeing an emergence of promising new directions aimed at the induction of islet regeneration by endogenous factors, suggesting that the repair of pancreatic tissue is possible without the need for an engraftment of donor tissue. These recent waves of technological progress have injected new hope for a combined therapy to offer diabetic patients long-term benefits of insulin independence. This article reviews the latest findings on diabetic pathogenesis and discusses promising avenues to tolerance induction and islet regeneration.

Efficacy of human islet isolation from the tail section of the pancreas for the possibility of living donor islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation is on the rise for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Apparent donor shortages could be alleviated through use of living donor pancreata. A critical issue for using a section of pancreas from living donors is whether islet yields would be sufficient for transplantation.

METHODS

After obtaining human pancreata, islets were isolated from the head section (n=20, head group), tail section (n=23, tail group) or whole pancreas (n=24, whole group). Islets were isolated by enzymatic digestion followed by purification, then assessed for yields, purity, morphology, functionality, and insulin content.

RESULTS

Fifteen of twenty cases (75%) in the head group, all cases (100%) in the tail group, and 23 of 24 cases (96%) in the whole group were successfully completed for islet isolation. Islet yield per gram pancreas was significantly higher in the tail group compared with both the head and whole groups (head, 1,472+/-326 IE/g; tail, 4,256+/-574 IE/g; whole, 2,424+/-506 IE/g). Total islet yield from the head group was significantly lower compared with both tail and whole groups (head, 75,016+/-18,933 IE; tail, 197,469+/-28,236 IE; whole, 208,207+/-43,414 IE), and the tail group showed similar islet yield to the whole group. The whole group showed significantly lower purities and the head group showed significantly lower morphologic scores. There were no significant differences in viability, function, and insulin content among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The tail section of the human pancreas is suitable for islet isolation. The living donor islet transplantation may be feasible using only this section of the pancreas for the first transplantation to reduce hypoglycemic unawareness for small recipients, which might be followed by the second islet transplantation from cadaveric donor.

Transplantation of human umbilical cord blood cells improves glycemia and glomerular hypertrophy in type 2 diabetic mice

Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that either animal- or human-derived embryonic stem cells can differentiate into insulin-secreting cells and lower blood glucose levels. However, studies utilizing human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) mononuclear cells to improve blood glucose levels in diabetic animals have received little attention. In this study, we examined the effect of transplanted HUCB mononuclear cells on blood glucose levels, survival, and renal pathology in obese mice with spontaneous development of type 2 diabetes. The results show that injection of HUCB mononuclear cells into orbital plexus of mice caused improvement not only in blood glucose levels and survival rate but also normalization of glomerular hypertrophy and tubular dilatation. Thus, transplantation of HUCB mononuclear cells appears to be another modality of stem cell therapy in diabetes mellitus.

Human fetal islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients: Comparison of metabolic effects between single and multiple implantation regimens

Previous studies suggest that multiple transplantations might be equally efficient to a single regimen for human adult islets. The aim of this study was to compare metabolic parameters after each of the two regimens of human fetal islet (HFI) transplantation in type 1 diabetics. In group A (single transplant, n = 9), 180 +/- 20 x 1000 HFI equivalents (IEQs) were implanted by a single IM injection; in group B (multiple transplants, n = 8) islets were implanted as three consecutive injections (60 +/- 10 x 1000 IEQs) at 7-day intervals. We analyzed the metabolic parameters on days -1, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 after the procedure. Among the metabolic parameters, we evaluated insulin secretion capacity-ISC (C peptide, RIA), metabolic control (HbA1c, chromatography), and insulin daily dose IDD. We found that C peptide levels increased, peaking on day 90 (A: 0.38 +/- 0.15; B: 0.34 +/- 0.19 nmol/L, P = NS) and then rapidly decreasing without differences, the HbA1c levels and IDD decreased in the same manner without differences between the groups. Our results demonstrate that multiple and single islet transplant regimens are equally efficient to temporarily restore a significant ISC with improvement of metabolic and clinical parameters. The results imply that the two regimens have an equal clinical value.

Risks and side effects of islet transplantation

Islet transplantation can deliver stable glycemic control, relief from recurrent severe hypoglycemia, and insulin independence. Accessing the portal vein via the percutaneous hepatic approach carries the risk of bleeding, and the infusion of islets a risk of portal vein thrombosis. In the long term, common minor problems with immunosuppression are mouth ulcers, diarrhea, and acne. Longer-term risks include malignancy and serious infection, both rare to date in clinical islet transplantation. Sensitization to donor antigens may also occur. The long-term diabetes complications may stabilize, but of this aspect little is known to date. In the short term, there may be some elevation of serum cholesterol and blood pressure, in some patients there has been a decline in renal function, and in a few, acute retinal bleeds. For most, improvement in glucose control with resolution of glycemic lability and hypoglycemia has been a net benefit.

Harnessing the Immunomodulatory Properties of Sertoli Cells to Enable Xenotransplantation in Type I Diabetes

Islet transplantation has emerged as a viable long-term means of treating type I diabetes. This is largely due to the success of the "Edmonton protocol" which has produced insulin independence in 85% of patients 1 year after transplantation of allogeneic islets together with a non-steroid immunosuppressive regimen. While these data provide a clear and unequivocal demonstration that islet transplantation is a viable treatment strategy, the shortage of suitable donor tissue together with the debilitating consequences of life-long immunosuppression necessitate the development of novel means to enable transplantation of all type 1 diabetics including the young juvenile diabetics. One potential means of enabling islet transplantation takes advantage of the ability of Sertoli cells to provide local immunoprotection to co-grafted islets, including those from xenogeneic sources. Sertoli cells are normally found in the testes where one of their functions is to provide local immunologic protection to developing germ cells. In animal models, allogeneic and xenogeneic islets survive and function for extended periods of time when grafted into the testes. Moreover, isolated Sertoli cells protect co-grafted allogeneic and xenogeneic islets from immune destruction and reverse diabetes in immunocompetent and autoimmune animals. These benefits are discussed in the context of several potential underlying biological mechanisms.

Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation

Pancreatic islet cell transplantation as a treatment for diabetes has hitherto been confined to small patient cohorts with limited success. This article summarizes the results of islet cell transplantation before and after the advent of the new 'Edmonton protocol' of immunosuppression and management of the donor pancreas. Adopting this regimen has achieved unprecedented success and renewed interest in this potential cure for diabetes. Central to recent improvements in the technique has been the transplantation of an adequate islet mass. Improved methods to procure, isolate, and purify islets for clinical use are now being adopted as a new 'gold standard'. The use of new immunosuppressive drugs has further improved clinical results. Corticosteroid sparing-based regimens, and agents such as humanized monoclonal antibodies, are likely to form the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols with the aim of achieving donor-specific tolerance. Alternative sources of islet cells are also required to expand the technique in an era of reduced numbers of donor pancreata. Manipulation of stem cells and xenotransplantation may yet yield sufficient islets to overcome the problem of donor shortage. Islet cell transplantation now forms the basis of a prospective multicenter trial under the aegis of the Immune Tolerance Network. The results of this are awaited, but it appears that islet cell transplantation may yet emerge as an effective treatment option for some members of the diabetic population.

Islet transplantation for diabetes: current status and future prospects

There has been an explosion of interest in developing transplantation strategies to replace the islets lost during the normal progression of diabetes. In large part, the renewed interest is due to the unprecedented success of the 'Edmonton protocol' for Type I diabetics following islet allografting and a modified immunosuppressive regimen. While these data provide a clear and unequivocal demonstration that islet transplantation is a viable treatment strategy, the shortage of suitable donor tissue, together with the debilitating consequences of life long immunosuppression necessitate a concerted effort to develop novel means to enable islet transplantation on a widespread basis. This review outlines several of these possibilities including the development of novel, less toxic immunosuppressants, tolerising the host immune system to accept islet transplants, developing alternative sources of islet cells via gene therapy, stem cell technologies and xenotransplantation, immunoisolation of islets and providing local immunosuppression to islet grafts using Sertoli cells. These possibilities are highlighted in the context of islet cell transplantation as a success, but with need for further refinements before it is a panacea for most patients.