Treatment of advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck with alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint.

RESULTS

For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.

Survival Impact of Surgical Resection in Locally Advanced T4b Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

With non-surgical treatment, T4b oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have an unacceptably poor prognosis. A subset of patients if selected wisely for surgery, can have significantly improved survival. The present study aims to explore the feasibility of radical resection and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the T4b OSCC and their impact on survival, along with the factors affecting it.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of 302 consecutive patients with T4b OSCC presented at our institute between July 2015 and January 2016.

METHODS

Three different treatment protocols were decided depending on the extent of the disease-upfront resection, NACT (followed by surgery or chemo/radiation depending on the response), or upfront non-surgical treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy).

RESULTS

Upfront surgery was done in 67 (22.19%) patients and 155 (51.32%) patients received NACT. The rest of the patients received upfront non-surgical treatment. The overall response rate of NACT was 23.23% and the resectability rate was 36.13%. The median OS for the whole population was 12 months (30 months for the surgical group and 9 months for the non-surgical group). There was no survival difference between supra versus infra-notch tumors (P value = .552) or post-NACT versus upfront surgery (P value = .932). Nodal involvement was the most important poor prognostic factor affecting both DFS (P = .006) and OS (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

With proper patient selection after thorough clinico-radiological assessment, a subset of T4b OSCC can be operated with curative intention; either upfront or after downstaging with NACT, which ultimately translates into improved survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2266-E2274, 2021.

Involvement of the TGF-β1 pathway in caveolin-1-associated regulation of head and neck tumor cell metastasis

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most frequent malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 54%. Therefore, disease management improvement is required. The present study aimed to assess the role of caveolin-1 (Cav-1) in the metastasis of head and neck tumor cells. Short hairpin RNA was used to silence Cav-1 expression in Tu686 cells. Proliferation, migration, invasion, morphology and the levels of effector proteins were assessed in cells. Upon Cav-1 silencing, E-cadherin levels were decreased, while vimentin levels were significantly increased. Cell migration, quantified by wound healing and Transwell assays, was significantly increased. Meanwhile, Cav-1 and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) receptor were identified to be co-localized. In addition, Cav-1-knockdown resulted in increased phosphorylation of SMAD family member 2 (P<0.05), a downstream effector of TGF-β signaling. In addition, there was a mutual regulation, with increasing TGF-β1 levels leading to a dose-dependent decrease of Cav-1 expression levels (P<0.05). These findings indicate that Cav-1 inhibits cell metastasis in HNSCC, suggesting the involvement of the TGF-β signaling pathway.

Upregulation of circFLNA contributes to laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma migration by circFLNA-miR-486-3p-FLNA axis

Background

Accumulating evidence shows that circular RNAs (circRNAs) plays vital roles in tumor progression. However, the biological functions of circRNAs in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) metastasis is still unclear.

Methods

qRT-PCR was used to detect circFLNA, miRNAs and FLNA mRNA expression. Transwell assay and western blot were performed to evaluate cell migration ability and to detect FLNA, MMP2 and MLK1 protein expression, respectively. RNA pull-down analysis was used to find the binding-miRNAs of circFLNA. Luciferase reporter assay was used to examine the effect of circFLNA on miRNAs and miR-486-3p on FLNA expression.

Results

In this study, we confirmed that a Filamin A (FLNA)-derived hsa_circ_0092012 known as circFLNA, was upregulated in LSCC, and the higher expression of circFLNA was correlated with LSCC lymph node metastasis. Increased circFLNA facilitates LSCC cell migration ability through upregulating FLNA and MMP2 protein expression. Mechanistically, we find that circFLNA sponges miR-486-3p in LSCC cells, relieving miR-486-3p-induced repression of FLNA which promotes LSCC cell migration. Accordingly, FLNA mRNA is overexpressed in LSCC tissues and a higher FLNA level is correlated with poor survival. Dysregulation of the circFLNA/miR-486-3p/FLNA regulatory pathway contributes to LSCC migration.

Conclusions

In summary, our study sheds light on the regulatory mechanism of circFLNA in LSCC migration via sponging miR‐486-3p, which downregulates the FLNA protein expression. Targeting circFLNA/miR-486-3p/FLAN axis provides a potential therapeutic target for aggressive LSCC.

Impact of treatment expertise on the outcome of patients with head and neck cancer treated within 6 randomized trials

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of center expertise, in terms of number of patients treated, on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis including data from 6 randomized trials in head and neck SCC conducted in Italy. We evaluated the association between OS or PFS and the number of patients recruited by the center.

RESULTS

The outcome of 903 patients who had received radiotherapy (RT) was analyzed (median follow-up 76 months). The hazard ratio (HR) comparing the third and the first quartiles of the distribution of number of patients per center showed an advantage in PFS (HR 0.59, range 0.53-0.65, P < .0001) and in OS (HR 0.70, 0.60-0.81, P < .0001) for centers with a higher number of patients recruited. A similar benefit was observed in PFS (HR 0.63, 0.60-0.66) and OS (HR 0.74, 0.69-0.79) considering the mean number of patients per year.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFS and OS were longer for patients treated in high-case-volume centers.

Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

Prognosis in relapsed metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (RM-HNSCC) is dismal. Platinum based chemotherapy in combination with Cetuximab is used in first-line setting, while no further validated options are available at progression. Immunotherapy has produced durable clinical benefit in some patients with RM-HNSCC although the premises are several patients are nonresponders. Studies are ongoing to determine predictive factors and the ideal setting/combination of novel immunotherapies. In this paper, we discuss the past and present of immunotherapy in head and neck cancer and provide an up-to-date information regarding the potential ways to improve immunotherapy outcomes in HNSCC.

Compliance and Outcomes in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Alternating Chemoradiotherapy in Clinical Practice

Background and Aims

To evaluate the feasibility in clinical practice of alternating chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

From August 1993 to April 1998 at the Division of Medical Oncology of Parma, 48 consecutive patients were observed, and 38 (79%) started the Merlano chemo-radiotherapy. The characteristics of the patients were: males (32, 84%); median age, 57 years; PS <2 (32, 84%). The primary sites were the oropharynx (18, 47%), oral cavity (8, 21%), hypopharynx (7, 19%), larynx (5, 13%); stage IV disease was present in 29 (76%) patients. Twenty-five (66%) patients were married, and 24 (63%) resided outside of the city.

Results

The compliance was very low: 21 patients (55%) performed all the programmed cycles of chemotherapy, whereas only 5 patients (13%) performed the chemo-radiotherapy at full doses without any delay. The objective responses were 3 (8%) complete and 21 (55%) complete plus partial responses. Failures were 2 (5%) stable disease and 2 (5%) progressive disease, and the response was not assessable in 10 (26%). The median duration of the response was 8 months. The median overall survival and the time to progression were 18 and 13 months, respectively; the 5-year overall and relapse-free survival were 36% and 26%, respectively. Nine (24%) patients were still alive as of August 30, 2001, 8 (21%) of them without progression. Twenty-six patients (68%) died with a local-regional relapse. One patient (3%) died for a second cancer. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity was leukopenia (n = 25, 66%) and thrombocytopenia (n = 9, 24%); grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity was diarrhea (n = 3, 8%) and mucositis (n = 2, 5%). Two patients (5%) died for intestinal infarction and perforation possibly related to treatment.

Conclusions

Compliance to the chemo-radiotherapy was very poor. The response rate was lower than that reported in clinical trials, whereas overall survival was comparable. The alternating chemo-radiotherapy is a very complex treatment that cannot be easily applied in clinical practice; a careful selection of patients is mandatory not only considering oncologic and medical criteria, but also the level of awareness of the patient and his family.

Late Local Treatment Morbidity after Accelerated Radiotherapy or Alternating Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma

Background

To report local long-term morbidity after concomitant boost radiotherapy (AFRT) or alternating chemoradiotherapy (CTRT), we analyzed the toxicity data recorded in 168 patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated at our institution within phase II-III studies.

Patients and Methods

All patients enrolled in three consecutive phase II-III studies and followed for a minimum of three months after the end of treatment were included in the present analysis. Local late reactions were scored prospectively. The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or more (2-4) late local toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC was taken as endpoint. The median follow-up is 32.0 months (range, 3.3-138.1 months). For living patients the minimum and median follow-up are 12.1 and 69.3 months, respectively.

Results

The five-year actuarial incidence of grade 2+ and grade 3+ toxicity are 56.7 ± 5% and 21 ± 4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, acute mucositis grade, complementary surgery, primary site and performance status proved to be independent predictive factors of grade 2+ late toxicity with P values of <0.001, 0.009, 0.022 and 0.033, respectively. No effect was found for treatment itself on the incidence of late toxicity, although patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy had a higher probability of confluent mucositis than patients treated with alternating chemoradiotherapy (68% vs 32%, P <0.01).

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of surviving patients develops late complications, although severe irreversible reactions occur in a minority of patients. Acute local toxicity can be used to predict local late toxicity that arises within five years of the end of treatment.

Lack of a Time-Factor in Alternating Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

To assess whether a radiotherapy time factor exists also for patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and receiving combined chemoradiotherapy.

Methods and materials

From 1989 to 1997, of 121 patients affected by stage III or IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the Merlano regimen at our institution, 59 were selected for time factor analysis. Until 1995, if chemotherapy had to be delayed because of bone marrow toxicity, radiotherapy was also delayed accordingly. Since January 1996 in order to avoid treatment-free gaps, radiotherapy was delivered continuously until it was possible to resume chemotherapy. Potential predictive factors of local-regional control were included in univariate and multivariate models. The median follow-up is 26 months (5-121 months).

Results

As a result of change in treatment policy, mean radiotherapy duration was shorter for 25 patients treated after 1995 (group A, 8.4 weeks) than for those treated during 1995 or before (group B, 9.4 weeks) (t test, P = 0.0012). In contrast, as expected, mean chemotherapy duration remained relatively unchanged through the years (10.9 vs 10.7 weeks for groups B and A, respectively, t test, P = 0.77). At 2 years, the actuarial local-regional control rate was 53 ± 7% for the whole population. The estimated rates of local-regional control at 2 years were 49 ± 10% and 56 ± 9% for patients belonging to groups A and B, respectively. At univariate and multivariate analyses, treatment group was not predictive of local-regional control.

Conclusions

Our attempt to prospectively limit radiotherapy overall treatment time failed to improve outcome. The data, although obtained on a relatively limited number of patients, suggest that tumor cell repopulation during radiotherapy may not be clinically relevant when chemotherapy is part of the treatment for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Long-Term Results of Conventional Radiotherapy versus Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy versus Concomitant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Carcinoma of the Oropharynx

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

To compare conventional fractionation (CF) radiation therapy (RT), arm A, versus a split-course accelerated hyperfractionated schedule (S-AHF), arm B, versus CFRT plus concomitant chemotherapy (CT), arm C, in terms of five-year survival and toxicity for squamous cell tumors of the oropharynx.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

Between January 1993 and June 1998, 192 previously untreated patients with stage III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T1N1 and T2N1) were enrolled in a multicenter randomized phase III trial (ORO 93-01). In arms A and C, 66 to 70 Gy in 33 to 35 fractions was administered five days a week for six and a half to seven weeks. In arm B, the dose delivered was 64 to 67.2 Gy in two fractions of 1.6 Gy every day, five days a week, with a planned two-week split at 38.4 Gy. In arm C the CT regimen consisted of three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CBDCA 75 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 4 every 28 days).

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found in five-year overall survival (P = 0.39): 21% for arm A, 21% for arm B, and 40% for arm C. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of five-year relapse-free survival: 15% for arm A, 17% for arm B, and 36% for arm C. There was a slight trend towards better five-year locoregional control (P = 0.07) for the combined arm: patients without locoregional relapse were 48% in arm C, 21% in arm A and 18% in arm B. Locoregional control was significantly better when arm C was compared with arms A and B combined (P = 0.02; arm A+B 20%; arm C 48%). Distant metastases were fairly balanced in the three arms (A: 14; B: 9; C: 11), with a tendency towards more frequent isolated distant metastasis development in arm C (8 of 11 [72%] versus 7 of 23 [30%] in arms A+B). Five-year second-tumor-free survival was 85%. The 13 second tumors were equally distributed and were mainly correlated with tobacco and alcohol consumption (five lung, two esophagus, two oral cavity, one larynx, one pancreas, one hepatocarcinoma, one myeloma). Arm C showed slightly more G3+ late side effects involving subcutaneous tissues and mucosa, although significant late sequelae were relatively uncommon and the mucosal side effects were mostly transient. The occurrence of persistent G3 xerostomia was comparable in the three treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained with the combination of CT and RT compared with RT alone did not reach statistical significance, but combined treatment almost doubled the five-year overall survival, relapse-free survival and locoregional control rate. Patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx who are medically suitable for the combined approach should be treated with a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The occurrence of second tumors is relatively common in these patients and may contribute substantially to the causes of death.

Organ Preservation for Advanced Larynx Cancer: Issues and Outcomes

PURPOSE

To provide a review of the clinical data, controversies, and limitations that underpin current recommendations for approaches to larynx preservation for locally advanced larynx cancer requiring total laryngectomy.

METHODS

The key findings from pivotal randomized controlled trials are discussed, including quality of life, late effects, and function assessments. Trials investigating taxane inclusion in induction chemotherapy and trials of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition for radiosensitization are put into perspective for larynx cancer. Controversies in the management of T4 primaries and the opportunities for conservation laryngeal surgery are reviewed.

RESULTS

There are data from clinical trials to support induction chemotherapy, followed by radiotherapy (preferred approach in Europe) and concomitant cisplatin plus radiotherapy (preferred in North America) for nonsurgical preservation of the larynx. Treatment intensification by a sequential approach of induction, followed by concomitant treatment, is investigational. Transoral laryngeal microsurgery and transoral robotic partial laryngectomy have application in selected patients.

CONCLUSION

The management of locally advanced larynx cancer is challenging and requires an experienced multidisciplinary team for initial evaluation, response assessment, and support during and after treatment to achieve optimal function, quality of life, and overall survival. Patient expectations, in addition to tumor extent, pretreatment laryngeal function, and coexisting chronic disease, are critical factors in selecting surgical or nonsurgical primary treatment.

Sepsis in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation: Literature review and consensus

The reporting of infection/sepsis in chemo/radiation-treated head and neck cancer patients is sparse and the problem is underestimated. A multidisciplinary group of head and neck cancer specialists from Italy met with the aim of reaching a consensus on a clinical definition and management of infections and sepsis. The Delphi appropriateness method was used for this consensus. External expert reviewers then evaluated the conclusions carefully according to their area of expertise. The paper contains seven clusters of statements about the clinical definition and management of infections and sepsis in head and neck cancer patients, which had a consensus. Furthermore, it offers a review of recent literature in these topics.

Strategies for non-resectable head and neck cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment of unresectable, locally advanced head and neck cancer consists of many different options, all of them based on radiotherapy. The main variable is represented by chemotherapy, i.e., the way in which chemotherapy is combined with radiation. More recently, the combination of cetuximab and radiotherapy emerged as a new treatment opportunity and induction chemotherapy, with the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluoruracil, gained a renewed interest. Concurrent chemoradiation is based on the most robust evidence and is regarded as the leading standard of care for unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer. Unfortunately, chemoradiation is hampered by severe toxicity and patients must be selected carefully before treatment. The experience of the staff (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and nurses), and in particular its familiarity with toxicity management, as well the structural facilities, play an important role in the final outcome. When the patient is unfit for chemoradiation, or when experienced staff or adequate structures are unavailable, induction chemotherapy, cetuximab and radiotherapy, or radiotherapy alone are all evidence-based alternative options. The choice among them will be based on the clinical condition of the patient, the physician's experience, and the patient's preference. Whatever is the treatment of choice, it is important to involve a multidisciplinary staff in the management of these patients. Indeed, also unresectable patients may require supportive surgical interventions before or during treatment, or removal of residual disease after treatment.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (sequential approach) in the management of head and neck cancer

Concurrent chemoradiation is considered the standard-of-care for locally advanced head and neck cancer of the hypopharynx, oropharynx and larynx, as well as unresectable disease. This paradigm was challenged by the introduction of induction chemotherapy (IC), which demonstrated non-inferiority in regards of overall survival (OS), along with increased organ preservation, when compared to the surgery and radiotherapy. More recently, IC followed by concurrent chemoradiation, the so-called sequential approach was developed in an attempt to decrease metastatic spread and improve locoregional control (LRC) rates, with much controversy amongst experts. A careful evaluation by a multidisciplinary team is necessary to recognize which patients should be offered this therapeutic approach due to a significantly greater rate of toxicity. Herein, we analyze the most current available evidence regarding the use of sequential therapy versus concurrent chemoradiation. Different factors including toxicity profile, adherence and patient characteristics play a major role in choosing the most appropriate treatment regimen.

Future chemotherapy and radiotherapy options in head and neck cancer

Chemoradiation is a standard approach to advanced unresectable head and neck cancer, although the optimum combination regimen remains controversial. However, in the past few years, chemoradiation has been successfully extended from the treatment of unresectable disease to the postsurgical therapy of high-risk patients and its value as an organ preservation procedure is under evaluation. More recently, molecular-targeted therapies have emerged, which interfere with mechanisms of chemo- and radioresistance, and preliminary data are promising. Their use in the combined treatment of head and neck cancer will hopefully further improve the value of chemoradiation in the clinical setting.

Genome stability pathways in head and neck cancers

Genomic instability underlies the transformation of host cells toward malignancy, promotes development of invasion and metastasis and shapes the response of established cancer to treatment. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of genomic stability in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), with an emphasis on DNA repair pathways. HNSCC is characterized by distinct profiles in genome stability between similarly staged cancers that are reflected in risk, treatment response and outcomes. Defective DNA repair generates chromosomal derangement that can cause subsequent alterations in gene expression, and is a hallmark of progression toward carcinoma. Variable functionality of an increasing spectrum of repair gene polymorphisms is associated with increased cancer risk, while aetiological factors such as human papillomavirus, tobacco and alcohol induce significantly different behaviour in induced malignancy, underpinned by differences in genomic stability. Targeted inhibition of signalling receptors has proven to be a clinically-validated therapy, and protein expression of other DNA repair and signalling molecules associated with cancer behaviour could potentially provide a more refined clinical model for prognosis and treatment prediction. Development and expansion of current genomic stability models is furthering our understanding of HNSCC pathophysiology and uncovering new, promising treatment strategies.

Comparison of sequential chemoradiation with radiation alone in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

To compare locoregional control with alternating chemo radiation and radiation alone in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

50 patients of biopsy proven locally-advanced carcinoma of head and neck.

INTERVENTION

25 patients were kept in Group I or study group (i.e. alternating chemo-radiation) and 25 patients in Group II or control group (i.e. radiation alone). In the study group, patients were given 3 cycles of chemotherapy (Cisplatin 20 mg/m([2]) and Inj. 5-FU 200mg/m([2]) from day 1-5 of each week) during weeks 1,5 and 9 alternated with radiation dose of 10Gy/week was given during weeks 2,3,4 and 6,7,8. In the control group, patients were given a total dose of 60Gy in 6 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The response rate at the primary site and nodal site was better in study group as compared to control group.

RESULTS

On comparing the response at the primary and nodal site together, 72% (18/25) patients of group I and 44% (11/25) patients of group II showed CR. PR was seen in 28% (7/25) and 36% (9/25) patients in group I and II respectively. No response was seen in 5/25 (20%) of patients in Group II.

CONCLUSION

Our study has revealed that alternating/ sequential chemoradiation is a promising and feasible approach for patients in advanced head and neck cancer.

Incidence and risk factors for infection in oral cancer patients undergoing different treatments protocols

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, advances in cancer treatments have been counterbalanced by a rising number of immunosuppressed patients with a multitude of new risk factors for infection. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine risk factors, infectious pathogens in blood and oral cavity of oral cancer patients undergoing different treatment procedures.

METHODS

The present prospective cohort analysis was conducted on the patients undergoing treatment in the radiotherapy unit of Regional Cancer Institute, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, during the period of January 2007 to October 2009. Total 186 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity were analyzed in the study. Based on treatment procedures patients were divided into three groups, group I were under radiotherapy, group II under chemotherapy and group III were of radio chemotherapy together. Clinical isolates from blood and oral cavity were identified by following general microbiological, staining and biochemical methods. The absolute neutrophile counts were done by following the standard methods.

RESULTS

Prevalent bacterial pathogens isolated were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris and the fungal pathogens were Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus. The predominant gram negative bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia were isolated from blood of radiotherapy and oral cavity of chemotherapy treated cases respectively. The predominance of gram positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis) were observed in blood of chemotherapy, radio chemotherapy cases and oral cavity of radiotherapy, radio chemotherapy treated cases. Our study also revealed the presence of C. albicans fungi as most significant oral cavity pathogens in radiotherapy and radio chemotherapy cases.

CONCLUSION

Gram positive bacteria and Gram negative were reported from the blood of all the three groups of patients. Oral mucositis played a significant role in oral cavity infection and make patients more prone to C. albicans infection.

Management of unresectable malignant tumors at the skull base using concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy with accelerated fractionation

Between January 1988 and June 1992, 20 patients with unresectable malignant tumors at the skull base were treated. Eleven had T4 lesions of the paranasal sinus/cavity complex, and 9 had T4 nasopharynx cancer. All patients had stage IV disease by the American Joint Committee on Staging Criteria. The histology was squamous cell cancer in 15 patients and other minor salivary gland histologies in 5. There was brain and/or dural invasion in 11 patients and orbital invasion in 9. All patients received radiation therapy with accelerated fractionation to a total of 70 Gy in 6 weeks. Concomitant cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) was given on days 1 and 22 of radiation. Seven patients received mitomycin C (7.5 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 22, plus adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine. Median follow-up was 11 (range: 1 to 43) months. At 2 years, local progression-free survival was 94%, distant metastases-free survival was 57%, and overall survival was 80%. Complications occurred in 20% and caused the death of 1 patient. Treatment of this group of patients with aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy produced excellent local control in our early experience, but longer follow-up is needed. There is a high rate of distant failure. Future strategies are outlined.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy using low-dose weekly gemcitabine versus low-dose weekly paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III study

The objective of this study was to compare concomitant chemoradiotherapy based on weekly low-dose gemcitabine versus weekly low-dose paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Previously, untreated patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to one of the two concomitant chemoradiation regimens: (1) weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) over 30 min 1-2 h before radiotherapy and (2) weekly paclitaxal at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) over 60 min 4-6 h before radiotherapy. The planned radiotherapy dose was 65 Gy over 6.5 weeks in 32 settings. Two hundred and sixteen patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (110 patients) and group B (106 patients) who received concomitant weekly low-dose gemcitabine and low-dose paclitaxal, respectively, with the radiotherapy protocol. The hematological toxicity was generally mild. On the contrary, non-hematologic toxicities were severe. Grade III mucositis occurred in 36% in group A and in 24% in group B (P = 0.04). Moreover, grade III dermatitis were encountered in 24% in group A and 13% in group B (P = 0.049). Thirty-two (29%) of group A and 18(17%) of group B patients required enteral or parenteral feeding (P = 0.01). Sixteen (15%) of group A and 6 (6%) of group B required enteral or parenteral feeding that lasted for 6 months (P = 0.03). Regarding the late effect on swallowing, 8% of patients in group A and 2% of patients in group B required enteral or parenteral feeding for more than 6 months (P = 0.035). Response rates were 78 and 89% in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.038). The 2-year progression-free survival figures were 54 and 64% of groups A and B, respectively; however, the 2-year overall survival figures were 56 and 67%, respectively. On the other hand, the 3-year progression-free survival figures were 39 and 48% for groups A and B, respectively, while the 3-year overall survival figures were 45 and 49%, respectively (P = 0.05). Both concomitant chemoradiotherapy regimens were easily given in the outpatient clinic. The regimen based on paclitaxel was significantly more tolerable and effective; however, the difference was not enormous.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 28th July 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other possible sources of bias. Data were extracted using a specially designed form and entered into the characteristics of included studies table and the analysis sections of the review. The proportion of participants in each trial with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are recorded in Additional Table 1.

MAIN RESULTS

There was no statistically significant improvement in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone in 25 trials (hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone in 10 trials (HR of mortality 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99), and there was an additional benefit of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy in 4 of these trials (HR of mortality 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98). Concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone in patients whose tumours were considered unresectable in 25 trials (HR of mortality 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). However, the additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy is associated with a 9% increase in survival and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a 16% increase in overall survival following surgery. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed a 22% benefit in overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone.

Positron emission tomography in surveillance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

We assessed the role of (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

A prospective study presented 80 PET before and after CRT for 44 patients, including 44 first-time post-CRT scans performed between 12 and 17 weeks after radiotherapy completion, as well as 10 repeated scans in the subsequent follow-up. PET interpretations were compared with clinicopathologic outcomes.

RESULTS

PET demonstrated better performance than CT in post-CRT surveillance. Considering all 54 post-CRT PET scans, sensitivity for detecting primary tumors was 100%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value (PPV) 80%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 100%. For cervical diseases, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98%, PPV 92%, and NPV 100%. For distant metastases, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98%, PPV 86%, and NPV 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative PET readings were reliable for predicting free of HNSCC and helpful for selected patients in post-CRT surveillance.

Radiation enhances suicide gene therapy in radioresistant laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma via activation of a tumor-specific promoter

Radioresistant cells have been shown to correlate with poor outcome after radiotherapy. Here, we found that human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (hTERTp) had lower activity in laryngeal squamous carcinomas cells than in radioresistant variant cells. Combining radiotherapy with plasmid phTERTp-HRP, in which expression of enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) controlled by hTERTp, resulted in increased apoptosis and necrosis of tumor cells after prodrug indole-3-acetic acid (IAA; converted by HRP into a cytotoxin) incubation. Volume and wet weight of xenograft tumor were reduced more in the combination groups. These data suggest that hTERTp has potential use in targeted cancer gene therapy, especially for radioresistant tumors. Combining radiotherapy with hTERTp-HRP/IAA may overcome radioresistance in laryngeal squamous carcinomas cells and amplify the killing effect in targeted cancer cells.

A phase II trial of low-dose gemcitabine and radiation alternated to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil: an active and manageable regimen for stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The addition of gemcitabine may be a reasonable way to enhance the activity of the alternating cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and radiation regimen considered the referring approach for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck at the National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa.

METHODS

Three courses of cisplatin, 20mg/m(2)/day and 5-fluorouracil, 200mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5 (weeks 1, 4, and 7) alternated to 3 courses of radiotherapy at standard fractionation (weeks 2-3, 5-6, 8-9) up to 60Gy, and gemcitabine, 50mg/m(2) on monday of each week of radiation, were administered to 47 patients with stage IV (42 patients) or relapsed after surgery (5 patients), SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the patients completed the planned treatment. Main grade 3-4 acute toxicities were: mucositis (40%), neutropenia (26%) and thrombocytopenia (30%). Twenty-seven patients reached a complete response (57%). Seven partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate: 72%). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 50%, 43% and 54%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of gemcitabine at low dose to our referring alternating regimen is feasible and very active. It may improve the long-term outcomes despite an acceptable increase of acute mucoseal toxicity.

Phase 3 randomized trial on larynx preservation comparing sequential vs alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Both induction chemotherapy followed by irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been reported as valuable alternatives to total laryngectomy in patients with advanced larynx or hypopharynx cancer. We report results of the randomized phase 3 trial 24954 from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

METHODS

Patients with resectable advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (tumor stage T3-T4) or hypopharynx (T2-T4), with regional lymph nodes in the neck staged as N0-N2 and with no metastasis, were randomly assigned to treatment in the sequential (or control) or the alternating (or experimental) arm. In the sequential arm, patients with a 50% or more reduction in primary tumor size after two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil received another two cycles, followed by radiotherapy (70 Gy total). In the alternating arm, a total of four cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (in weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) were alternated with radiotherapy with 20 Gy during the three 2-week intervals between chemotherapy cycles (60 Gy total). All nonresponders underwent salvage surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain time-to-event data.

RESULTS

The 450 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (224 to the sequential arm and 226 to the alternating arm). Median follow-up was 6.5 years. Survival with a functional larynx was similar in sequential and alternating arms (hazard ratio of death and/or event = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.68 to 1.06), as were median overall survival (4.4 and 5.1 years, respectively) and median progression-free interval (3.0 and 3.1 years, respectively). Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 64 (32%) of the 200 patients in the sequential arm who received radiotherapy and in 47 (21%) of the 220 patients in the alternating arm. Late severe edema and/or fibrosis was observed in 32 (16%) patients in the sequential arm and in 25 (11%) in the alternating arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Larynx preservation, progression-free interval, and overall survival were similar in both arms, as were acute and late toxic effects.

Chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer

Three decades of collaborative research have led to the integration of platinum-based chemotherapy into the curative management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and gains in local-regional control, organ preservation and survival endpoints. Concomitant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the strategy that has proven most effective for organ preservation for larynx and oropharynx cancers, the treatment of unresectable disease, nasopharyngeal cancer and the post-operative adjuvant treatment of patients at high risk of recurrence. The evolution of current indications for this multimodality approach is reviewed and current areas of investigation discussed. Nearly all patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receive chemotherapy as part of initial curative treatment. The focus of future trials should be on survival improvement, toxicity reduction and risk stratification for treatment decision making.

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC)

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.

The cisplatin-irradiation combination suggests that apoptosis is not a major determinant of clonogenic death

It is commonly believed that tumor cells treated with anticancer agents, chemotherapy and/or radiation, die by apoptosis and that tumors which do not undergo apoptosis are resistant to treatment. In this study, we investigated the molecular basis underlying cisplatin cytotoxicity in the murine teratocarcinoma F9 cell line to see whether irradiation enhances cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. We compared the apoptosis induced by chemo and/or radiotherapy with other cellular effects such as cell survival, clonogenic capability, cell cycle perturbation, expression of p53 and p53-related mRNAs, and necrosis. When combined with radiation, a clear additive cytotoxic effect of cisplatin was demonstrated. We found that both cisplatin and radiation induced cell death, but the level of induced apoptosis was low and there was no correlation with the results of the clonogenic assays: we noted a difference between cytotoxic effects in the clonogenic assay and the extent of apoptosis by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, suggesting that cell killing reflected not only apoptosis but also cell cycle arrest, and that apoptosis, cell kinetics and clonogenicity suppression were independent processes.

Taxane-based chemoirradiation for organ preservation with locally advanced head and neck cancer: results of a phase II multi-institutional trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal drug schedule and sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation for organ preservation in head and neck cancer has yet to be determined. We undertook a phase II trial of a taxane-based induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by a taxane-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) regimen in patients with resectable stage III or IV disease to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and overall efficacy.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with laryngeal or tongue base carcinomas were enrolled. All patients received 3 cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC (area under the curve) 6-7.5 over 30 minutes on days 1, 22, and 43. Responding patients went on to receive radiation (70 Gy/7 weeks) with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 22, and 43 and weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m(2) IV (n = 22). Because of hematologic toxicity, the concurrent regimen was changed to weekly carboplatin AUC 1 plus weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m(2) (n = 22).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with stage III and 21 patients with stage IV disease were enrolled. Median follow-up was 3.7 years. Acute toxicity of concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel was excessive, with significant hematologic toxicity and 2 toxic deaths. Acute toxicities of concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel were tolerable. No patients required permanent percutaneous gastrostomy tubes. The organ preservation rate was 83% (toxic deaths considered failures). Of 42 evaluable patients, 20 patients had complete responses (48%), 17 partial responses (41%), 3 minor responses (11%), 1 stable disease (2%), and 1 progressive disease (2%). Two-year local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were 82%, 77%, and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in relapse-free survival or organ preservation rates between concurrent regimens. Platinum and paclitaxel-based CCR is feasible after ICT and provides a high rate of organ preservation. Substitution of concurrent cisplatin to weekly carboplatin with paclitaxel and radiation has an improved toxicity profile. The ease of administration and low toxicity make this a regimen that is practical for use in the community setting.

Induction chemotherapy for squamous cancer of the head and neck

This paper reviews the efficacy and hazard of sequential combined treatment programs for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. These regimens consist of initial systemic chemotherapy, known as neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy, followed by radiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II trial from an Italian cooperative group

The aim of this multicenter trial was to test the feasibility and the activity of a three-drug combination where paclitaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Patients with metastatic or relapsed SCC-HN unsuitable for further loco-regional radical treatment, not previously treated with chemotherapy, were eligible to receive paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 (3-hr infusion) day 1, CDDP 25 mg/m2/day and 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day bolus on days 1, 2, 3 every three weeks up to a maximum of five courses. Fourty-seven patients were enrolled by five Institutions in Italy. Main grade III-IV toxicities were: neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (6%), anemia (4%), diarrhea (2%), mucositis (2%). Six patients had a complete response (13.3%) and eight a partial response (17.8%). Median progression free survival and overall survival are 4.1 and 7.9 months. One-year progression free survival and overall survival are 16% and 29%. This three-drug regimen has an excellent safety profile. The activity in the palliation of recurrent SCC-HN, however, does not appear to be improved in comparison with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin and paclitaxel regimens. Recent studies indicate a more promising role of taxanes including triplets in the induction therapy of previously untreated patients.

Alternating Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: An Alternative?

Rapidly alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ACR) is a minor variation of concurrent chemoradiation (CCR). This scheduling has been tested in advanced head and neck cancer and has shown superiority over standard radiation in some randomized trials with only marginally greater toxicity. This paper reviews ACR in advanced head and neck cancer. The hypothesis that this approach could have a better toxicity profile than CCR is discussed in light of the published clinical data. Efficacy is also discussed on the basis of available phase III trials. Published data indicate that rapidly alternating chemoradiation adds to toxicity less than CCR and results in comparable 3-year overall survival rates. In conclusion, ACR could be as active as, and possibly less toxic than, CCR. Comparative trials are highly recommended.