A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST)

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Diabetes may be associated with differential outcomes in patients undergoing left main coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes in patients with left main disease with and without diabetes randomized to PCI versus CABG.

METHODS

Individual patient data were pooled from 4 trials (SYNTAX [Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery], PRECOMBAT [Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease], NOBLE [Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularisation Study], and EXCEL [Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization]) that randomized patients with left main disease to PCI or CABG. Patients were considered suitable for either approach. Patients were categorized by diabetes status. Kaplan-Meier event rates, Cox model hazard ratios, and interactions were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 4393 patients, 1104 (25.1%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes experienced higher rates of 5-year death (158/1104 [Kaplan-Meier rate, 14.7%] versus 297/3289 [9.3%]; P<0.001), spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI; 67/1104 [6.7%] versus 114/3289 [3.7%]; P<0.001), and repeat revascularization (189/1104 [18.5%] versus 410/3289 [13.2%]; P<0.001). Rates of all-cause mortality did not differ after PCI versus CABG in those with (84/563 [15.3%] versus 74/541 [14.1%]; hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.82-1.52]) or without (155/1634 [9.7%] versus 142/1655 [8.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.36; PintHR=0.87) diabetes. Rates of stroke within 1 year were lower with PCI versus CABG in the entire population, with no heterogeneity based on diabetes status (PintHR=0.51). The 5-year rates of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization were higher after PCI regardless of diabetes status (spontaneous MI: 45/563 [8.9%] versus 22/541 [4.4%] in diabetes and 82/1634 [5.3%] versus 32/1655 [2.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.47; repeat revascularization: 127/563 [24.5%] versus 62/541 [12.4%] in diabetes and 254/1634 [16.3%] versus 156/1655 [10.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.18). For spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization, there were greater absolute risk differences beyond 1 year in patients with diabetes (4.9% and 9.9%) compared with those without (2.1% and 4.3%; PintARD=0.047 and 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with left main disease considered equally suitable for PCI or CABG and with largely low to intermediate SYNTAX scores, diabetes was associated with higher rates of death and cardiovascular events through 5 years. Compared with CABG, PCI resulted in no difference in the risk of death and a lower risk of early stroke regardless of diabetes status, and a higher risk of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization, with larger late absolute excess risks in patients with diabetes.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01205776, NCT0146651, NCT00422968, and NCT00114972.

Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP

AIMS

Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains unclear whether additional CHIP factors further increase the incidence of complications in complex PCI. Thus, in this study, we aim to compare the incidence of complications among definite CHIP, possible CHIP, and non-CHIP in terms of complex PCI and to further investigate the association between CHIP and complications.

METHODS

The primary aim of this study was to determine the major complications in PCI. We included 989 PCI lesions and divided those into definite CHIP (n=140), possible CHIP (n=397), and the non-CHIP groups (n=452).

RESULTS

The incidence of major complications was noted to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP, and lowest in the non-CHIP (p=0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation revealed definite CHIP (versus non-CHIP: odds ratio (OR) 2.099, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.062-4.150, p=0.033) was significantly associated with major complications after controlling for confounding factors. Another multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed immunosuppressive drugs (OR 3.040, 95% CI 1.251-7.386, p=0.014), unstable hemodynamics (OR 5.753, 95% CI 1.217-27.201, p=0.027), and frailty (OR 2.039, 95% CI 1.108-3.751, p=0.022) were significantly associated with major complications among CHIP factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of major complications in complex PCI was determined to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP and lowest in the non-CHIP. Thus, more attention should be given to the three components of CHIP to prevent major complications in complex PCI.

Incidence of arterial steno-occlusive disease and related factors in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Background: Patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery receive regular physical examinations and medications on an outpatient basis. However, these patients are at risk of developing other vascular diseases, such as postoperative arterial steno-occlusive disease (SOD). This study investigated the incidence of SOD and related factors.Methods: In total, 246 patients who underwent CABG surgery from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 were investigated. The incidence and risk factors of vascular disease were analyzed by dividing the included patients into SOD and non-SOD groups. Laboratory tests, medical history, surgical information, and family history were investigated through an electronic chart review.Results: Data from 193 patients who met the criteria were analyzed. SOD occurred in 19.1% of patients, and the cerebral artery (38%) was the most common artery involved, followed by the peripheral artery (32%), the coronary artery (22%), and the retinal artery (8%). Risk factors for the development of SOD included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; odds ratio [OR]=0.977, p=0.008), cholesterol (OR=1.020, p=0.001), and patients with diabetes complications (OR=5.077, p=0.010). The 3-year cumulative incidence rate was 21.6%, and the risk factors for cumulative occurrence were a low eGFR, elevated cholesterol, and complications of diabetes.Conclusions: Low eGFR, high cholesterol, and the presence of diabetic complications before CABG surgery may be associated with postoperative vascular disease. In these cases, close monitoring, proper drug administration, and patient warnings may be required.

External Validation of the FREEDOM Score for Individualized Decision Making Between CABG and PCI

BACKGROUND

Although randomized trials have established that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is, on average, the most effective revascularization strategy compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease (MVD), individual patients differ in many characteristics that can affect the benefits and harms of treatment. The FREEDOM (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus) score was developed to predict different outcomes with CABG vs PCI on the basis of 8 patient characteristics and the smoking-treatment interaction.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the ability of the 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) model to predict treatment benefit of CABG vs PCI in the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) and BEST (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) trials.

METHODS

This study identified 702 patients with diabetes and MVD to mirror the FREEDOM participants. Discrimination was assessed by C-index, and calibration was assessed by calibration plots in the PCI and CABG arms, respectively. The ability of the FREEDOM score to predict treatment benefit of CABG vs PCI was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, CABG was associated with a lower rate of 5-year MACE compared with PCI (12.4% vs 20.3%; log-rank P = 0.021) irrespective of a history of smoking (P_interaction = 0.975). Both discrimination and calibration were helpful in the PCI arm (C-index: 0.69; slope: 0.96, intercept: -0.24), but moderate in the CABG arm (C-index: 0.61; slope: 0.61; intercept: -0.53). The FREEDOM score showed some heterogeneity of treatment benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The FREEDOM score could identify some heterogeneity of treatment benefit of CABG vs PCI for 5-year MACE. Until further prospective validations are performed, these results should be taken into consideration when using the FREEDOM score in patients with diabetes and MVD. (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery [SYNTAX]; NCT00114972) (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [BEST]; NCT00997828) (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus [FREEDOM]; NCT00086450).

Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the most robust study design for evaluating the safety and efficacy of a therapeutic intervention. However, their internal validity are at risk when evaluating surgical interventions. This review summarizes existing expertise- based trials in surgery and related methodological concepts to guide surgeons performing this work. We provide caseloads required to reach the learning curve for various surgical interventions and report criteria for expertise from published and unpublished expertise-based trials. In addition, we review design and implementation concepts of expertise-based trials, including recruitment of surgeons, crossover, ethics, generalizability, sample size and definitions for learning curve. Several RCTs have used an expertise-based design. We found that the majority of definitions used for expertise were vague, heterogeneous, and inconsistent across trials evaluating the same surgical intervention. Statistical methods exist to adjust for the learning curve; however, there is limited guidance. We developed the following criteria for surgical expertise for future trials: 1) decide on the proxy to be used for the learning curve, and 2) assess eligible surgeons by comparing their performance to the previously defined expertise criteria.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes

As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to evolve, comparative outcomes for PCI vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain relevant in diabetic patients. All revascularization procedures in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus from 2010 to 2018 were included. Propensity matching was used to identify equivalent cohorts to compare revascularization strategies. Primary outcomes included 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality. Multivariable analysis was used to define factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). A total of 2869 patients with diabetes were divided into PCI (n = 653) and CABG (n = 2216) cohorts. Propensity matching yielded a 1:1 match consisting of 552 patients in each cohort (CABG vs PCI). Total median follow-up was 3.28 years (range: 1.83-5.00). Following propensity matching in patients with no prior PCI (1:1; n = 279), mortality remained significantly higher in the PCI cohort at 1 year (13.98% vs 7.53%; P = 0.014) and 5 years (26.88% vs 16.85%; P < 0.004). Hospital readmissions were higher for PCI patients at 1 year (16.49% vs 9.32%; P < 0.0122) and 5 years (19.71% vs 11.83%; P = 0.011). MACCE occurred more frequently in the PCI cohort (32.97% vs 21.51%; P = 0.002). Need for subsequent revascularization (6.45% vs 2.51%; P = 0.024) were significantly higher in the PCI cohort, and time interval to revascularization was significantly longer in the CABG cohort (3.48 [2.11-5.17] vs 2.62 [1.33-4.25] years; P < 0.001). The current study reports improved survival, fewer long-term hospital readmissions, and reduced MACCE and need for repeat revascularization in the CABG cohort. Given these data, patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease may fare better with surgical revascularization, compared to PCI.

Effectiveness of Clinical, Surgical and Percutaneous Treatment to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Patients Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography: An Observational Study

Purpose

To ascertain the most appropriate treatment for chronic, stable, coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients submitted to elective coronary angiography.

Patients and Methods

A total of 814 patients included in the prospective cohort study were referred for elective coronary angiography and were followed up on average for 6±1.9 years. Main outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke and late revascularization and their combinations as major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE): MACCE-1 included cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke; MACCE-2 was MACCE-1 plus late revascularization. Survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the association between the type of treatment and outcomes.

Results

All-cause death was lower in participants submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.41, 0.16-1.03, P=0.057) compared to medical treatment (MT). Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) had an overall trend for poorer outcomes: cardiovascular death 2.53 (0.42-15.10), combined cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke 2.15 (0.73-6.31) and these events plus late revascularization (2.17, 0.86-5.49). The corresponding numbers for PCI were 0.27 (0.05-1.43) for cardiovascular death, 0.77 (0.32-1.84) for combined cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke and 2.35 (1.16-4.77) with the addition of late revascularization. These trends were not influenced by baseline blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction and previous MI. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a significantly higher risk of recurrent revascularization when submitted to PCI than CABG.

Conclusion

Patients with confirmed CAD in elective coronary angiography do not have a better prognosis when submitted to CABG comparatively to medical treatment. Patients treated with PCI had a trend for the lower incidence of combined cardiovascular events, at the expense of additional revascularization procedures. Patients without significant CAD had a similar prognosis than CAD patients treated with medical therapy.

The strategy of surgical revascularization of coronary arteries in a multi-vessel lesion

This review presents the basic approaches for the surgical myocardial revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary lesions. The methods of coronary artery bypass grafting, balloon angioplasty, stenting using holometallic stents and drug-coated stents are discussed, the main studies comparing the above methods with each other and with the optimal drug therapy are presented. The concepts of complete and incomplete revascularization of the coronary bed are also explained.

The Eternal Debate: CABG Vs PCI. Current Status of the Literature

While advances in revascularization strategies have dramatically altered the morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery disease, significant equipoise remains regarding the optimal revascularization strategy for specific groups of patients. Herein, we review the 5 most impactful studies of the last 3 years and correlate this with a historical perspective.

Coronary Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

This study focused on contemporary outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD).

METHODS

This was a propensity-matched retrospective, observational analysis. Patients with MVCAD who underwent CABG or PCI between 2010 and 2018 and for whom data were available through the National Cardiovascular Data Registry or The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database were included. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included freedom from inpatient readmission and freedom from repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

Of the initial 6,163 patients with MVCAD, the propensity-matched cohort included 844 in each group. The estimated 1-year mortality was 11.5% and 7.2% (p < 0.001) in the PCI and CABG groups, respectively, with an overall hazard ratio for mortality of PCI versus CABG of 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.10; p < 0.001). The overall hazard ratio for readmission for PCI versus CABG was 1.42 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.64; p < 0.001). The overall hazard ratio for repeat revascularization for PCI versus CABG was 4.06 (95% CI, 2.39 to 6.91; p < 0.001). Overall major adverse cardiovascular events and individual outcomes of mortality, readmission, and repeat revascularization all favored CABG across virtually all major clinical subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

This contemporary propensity-matched analysis of patients undergoing coronary revascularization for MVCAD demonstrates a significant mortality benefit with CABG over PCI, and this benefit is consistent across virtually all major patient subgroups. Futures studies are needed reflecting routine practice to assess how best to approach shared decision making and informed consent when it comes to revascularization decisions in any patient with MVCAD.

Transcatheter versus surgical intervention: lessons from trials of coronary revascularisation

In this paper, a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist draw lessons from the trials of percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft surgery (PCI/CABG) for the transcatheter aortic valve implantation/surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVI/SAVR) era. Both PCI and CABG are effective treatments, but do the trials ask the right questions? They dwell on the ‘either/or’ decision for selected patients suitable for both treatments, but provide little guidance for the majority of ‘real world’ patients with comorbidities precluding CABG, or complex coronary heart disease precluding PCI. The control group must be meaningful and relevant. The pace of technological and therapeutic change causes trials to date rapidly. Procedures often do not reflect everyday practice, such as performing multivessel PCI, copious stenting and full arterial grafting. Composite endpoints such as major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) provide statistical significance but little insight into patient-orientated needs. There is a variety of temporal, safety, symptomatic and prognostic endpoints, provoking debate over their relative and absolute magnitude and importance; and there are issues of interpretation and inappropriate extrapolation. Trial interpretation, crystallised in the Kaplan-Meier curve, focuses on the relative benefit of one treatment over another, but deserves careful scrutiny. Subgroup analysis tends to exceed its role in dealing with issues such as poor left ventricular function, diabetes, multivessel disease and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Meta-analysis is controversial and guidelines date rapidly, lacking robust evidence in some domains, yet assuming considerable importance. Measures of frailty, physiological measures of blood flow, ‘real world’ activity levels, and predictions of benefit rarely feature. The multidisciplinary Heart Team meeting, now integral to study design, is challenging to deliver in practice. The PCI/CABG trials, and the issues arising from them, provide salutary lessons in the TAVI/SAVR era.

Acupuncture and the Cardiovascular System: A Scientific Challenge

In acupuncture research two main issues have to be addressed. One is whether the needle has a biological effect of its own. The other is whether acupuncture is of help to patients in their daily lives. With reference to this, acupuncture is a complex form of treatment in which the needles modulate physiological mechanisms of the body and the doctor supports the patient to achieve a life-style that assists with this.

To evaluate the biological effects of needling, a randomised, controlled trial group of 49 patients with angina pectoris had acupuncture while cardiological, neurophysiological and psychological observations were made in a mutually independent manner. Needling was found to improve the working capacity of the heart. In addition, acupuncture was found to activate cardiovascular autoregulatory mechanisms in 24 healthy persons.

To evaluate the effect of acupuncture in daily life, a controlled trial group of 69 patients with severe angina pectoris were followed for 2 years after treatment. The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was 7%, compared to 15–21% for the control group of published results concerning invasive treatments. Due to clinical improvement, surgery was postponed in 61% of the patients. The annual number of in-hospital days was reduced by 90%, leading to a US$ 12,000 saving for each patient.

Historical Milestones in the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease over the Last Half Century

Coronary revascularization for coronary artery disease dates back to the introduction of coronary bypass by Favaloro in 1967 and coronary angioplasty by Gruentzig in 1977 (first published in 1968 and 1978, respectively). There have been many technical improvements over the ensuing 5 decades, studied in clinical trials. This article reviews the history of coronary revascularization (the development of optimal medical therapy) and points the way to the future of stable coronary artery disease management.

Can We Improve the Outcomes of Multivessel Disease Using Modified SYNTAX and Residual SYNTAX Scores?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In spite of the benefits of drug eluting (DES), these advantages were not translated to better outcome when percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were compared with coronary artery bypass surgery. PCI strategy allowing stent deployment in all intermediate lesions including small vessels together with DES design may be the reasons of these findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently randomized and observational studies demonstrated using functional flow reserve analysis, residual Syntax score risk, or residual ERACI score after PCI that a reasonably incomplete revascularization was associated with good long-term outcome and low events rate at follow-up. In the ERACI IV study, which included patients with multiple vessel disease and left main, all intermediate lesions and severe lesions in small vessels were excluded from the revascularization strategy, and the 3-year follow-up results showed a remarkable low incidence of death/MI and stroke. Intermediate stenosis or severe lesions in small vessels should not be incorporated in the PCI strategy in order to define patient clinical cardiac prognosis or completeness of revascularization.

The Surgical Treatment of Coronary Artery Occlusive Disease: Modern Treatment Strategies for an Age Old Problem

Coronary artery disease remains a formidable challenge to clinicians. Percutaneous interventions and surgical techniques for myocardial revascularization continue to improve. Concurrently, in light of emerging data, multiple practice guidelines have been published guiding clinicians in their therapeutic decisions. The multidisciplinary Heart Team concept needs to be embraced by all cardiovascular providers to optimize patient outcomes.

The History of Cardiothoracic Surgery at Emory University

Over the past 50 years, the Emory Cardiothoracic Surgical Program has become one of the premier training programs in the United States. During this time, the Emory program has been sequentially led by Drs Osler Abbott, Charles Hatcher, and Robert Guyton. The program has grown from single faculty member to 25, and the culture of team collaboration, clinical excellence, research, and teaching established by Dr Hatcher has continued under the leadership of Dr Guyton for the past 26 years.

Comparison of Characteristics and Complications in Men Versus Women Undergoing Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Intervention

Gender differences exist in clinical outcomes after routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but studies reporting such outcomes after chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI are limited. We assessed the characteristics and outcomes of female patients undergoing CTO PCI. We retrospectively analyzed a dedicated national (United Kingdom) prospective CTO database from 2011 to 2015 for outcomes and characteristics of female patients undergoing CTO PCI (unmatched and propensity matched). Female patients constituted 20.5% (n = 260 of 1,271) of the unmatched cohort and 33.3% (n = 233 of 699) of the matched cohort and were more likely to be older (women aged >70 years, 48% in the unmatched and 45% in the matched cohort). An increased inhospital complication rate was observed in female patients (unmatched: 10% women vs 4.45% men, p = 0.0012, and matched 9.87% women vs 3.86% men, p = 0.0032). Coronary perforation, bleeding, and contrast-induced nephropathy were more frequently observed in female patients. Femoral access site with >6 French sheath was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Presence of calcification in the CTO artery was associated with coronary perforation (grade III) in female patients in the matched cohort (p = 0.007). Female patients undergoing CTO PCI were older and experienced increased of inhospital complications. Increased awareness of these complications could influence the selection of access site and sheath size, the need for prehydration, judicious choice of balloon size, collateral selection, and wire placement in female patients undergoing CTO PCI.

Years of Life Lost After Complications of Coronary Artery Bypass Operations

BACKGROUND

We currently have an incomplete understanding of which postoperative complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are associated with long-term death. The purpose of this study was to find the associations between complications and attributable death.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on patient characteristics, risk factors, and complications of patients undergoing isolated CABG with 20-year follow-up were analyzed with a Cox regression model to calculate the overall hazard of dying associated with each postoperative complication. An individual's age and hazard of dying from each complication were then used to calculate years of life lost to each complication.

RESULTS

The postoperative mortality rate was 0.79% (69 of 8,773) at 30 days, 2.85% (250 of 8,773) at 180 days, and 6.38% (560 of 8,773) at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 1,891 patients (21.6%) had died. Postoperative complications occurred in 3,438 patients (39.2%). Cardiac arrest (hazard ratio, 2.153), reoperation (hazard ratio, 1.679), and new dialysis (hazard ratio, 1.64) were the complications with the greatest hazard of death. After adjusting for complication incidence and patient age, cardiac arrest (703 years), reoperation (544 years), atrial fibrillation (470 years), and prolonged mechanical ventilation (371 years) were associated with the greatest number of years of life lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute cardiac arrest, reoperation for other cardiac reasons, new dialysis, atrial fibrillation, and prolonged mechanical ventilation are associated with the largest increase in attributable deaths. Prevention and treatment of these complications may improve mortality rates after cardiac operations.

Extended use of the GuideLiner in complex coronary interventions

AIMS

Challenging coronary anatomies including chronic total occlusions (CTO), extreme vessel tortuosity, diseased bypass grafts, and anomalous coronary arteries pose difficulties in coronary interventions. The GuideLiner is a monorail catheter originally developed to facilitate delivery of stents to target lesions in tortuous vessels. We conducted a study on the feasibility and safety of utilising this catheter in a wider array of complex coronary interventions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing coronary or peripheral interventions where a GuideLiner was used were recruited into this study. Patient demographics, lesion and vessel characteristics, procedural details and outcomes were prospectively entered into our database and analysed. From September 2009 to October 2011, 54 consecutive patients underwent coronary intervention in our institution using a GuideLiner; 21 out of 54 coronary applications were motivated by the need to increase support to cross CTOs, predominantly of the RCA. Anomalous or angulated take-off of the treatment vessels (31%), previously deployed proximal stents (15%), heavy proximal calcification (9%) and tortuosity (7%) accounted for the remaining reasons. One patient had successful renal denervation with the aid of a GuideLiner catheter. Procedural success was 98% in our series with no device-related periprocedural complications such as ostial dissection or myocardial necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a GuideLiner facilitates the approach to complex coronary interventions including chronic total occlusion and saphenous vein graft intervention by providing greater back-up support and easier engagement of coronary ostia.

Reduced risk of myocardial infarct and revascularization following coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease

Coronary atherosclerotic disease is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although revascularization improves outcomes, procedural risks are increased in CKD, and unbiased data comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous intervention (PCI) in CKD are sparse. To compare outcomes of CABG and PCI in stage 3 to 5 CKD, we identified randomized trials comparing these procedures. Investigators were contacted to obtain individual, patient-level data. Ten of 27 trials meeting inclusion criteria provided data. These trials enrolled 3993 patients encompassing 526 patients with stage 3 to 5 CKD of whom 137 were stage 3b-5 CKD. Among individuals with stage 3 to 5 CKD, mortality through 5 years was not different after CABG compared with PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.46) or stage 3b-5 CKD (HR 1.29, CI 0.68-2.46). However, CKD modified the impact on survival free of myocardial infarction: it was not different between CABG and PCI for individuals with preserved kidney function (HR 0.97, CI 0.80-1.17), but was significantly lower after CABG in stage 3-5 CKD (HR 0.49, CI 0.29-0.82) and stage 3b-5 CKD (HR 0.23, CI 0.09-0.58). Repeat revascularization was reduced after CABG compared with PCI regardless, of baseline kidney function. Results were limited by unavailability of data from several trials and paucity of enrolled patients with stage 4-5 CKD. Thus, our patient-level meta-analysis of individuals with CKD randomized to CABG versus PCI suggests that CABG significantly reduces the risk of subsequent myocardial infarction and revascularization without affecting survival in these patients.

Comparing the Clinical Outcomes Between Insulin-treated and Non-insulin-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Several studies have shown coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) to be beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and multivessel coronary artery diseases. Patients with insulin-treated T2DM (ITDM) are usually patients with poor glycemic control and are expected to suffer more complications compared with patients with non-insulin-treated T2DM (NITDM). However, the adverse clinical outcomes in patients with ITDM and NITDM after CABG are still not very clear. Hence, to solve this issue, we aim to compare the short-and long-term adverse clinical outcomes in a larger number of patients with ITDM and NITDM after CABG, respectively.Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the adverse clinical outcomes such as mortality, major adverse events (MAEs), stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization in patients with ITDM and NITDM after CABG have been searched from Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. A short-term follow-up (≤30 days) and a long-term follow-up (≥1 year) were considered. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to express the pooled effect on discontinuous variables and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3.Eleven studies involving a total of 64,152 patients with T2DM (23,781 patients with ITDM and 40,371 patients with NITDM) have been included in this meta-analysis. During the short-term follow-up period, patients with ITDM had a significantly higher mortality (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.33-1.61, P < 0.00001) and MAEs (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.48-1.87, P < 0.00001). During the long-term follow-up period, patients with ITDM still had a significantly higher rate of mortality, MAEs, and stroke (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49, P = 0.03; OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07-2.12, P = 0.02; OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.22-1.59, P < 0.00001, respectively) after CABG. However, our results showed similar repeated revascularization rate between the ITDM and NITDM groups after CABG (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.81-2.12, P = 0.27).According to this study, patients with ITDM had a significantly higher rate of mortality and MAEs compared with patients with NITDM after CABG. Stroke was also significantly higher in patients with ITDM during a long-term follow-up period. However, since the result for the long-term mortality had a higher heterogeneity as compared with the other subgroups, and because a similar revascularization rate was observed between the ITDM and NITDM groups after CABG maybe because of a limited number of patients analyzed, further studies still need to be conducted to completely solve this issue.

Adverse events following percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularisation: Analysis of non-MACE outcomes in the Stent or Surgery (SoS) Trial

OBJECTIVES

To analyse adverse events requiring or prolonging hospitalisation in the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial.

BACKGROUND

Many adverse events following coronary revascularisation are non-major adverse cardiovascular events (non-MACE). Trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) have reported rates of mortality and MACE only.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparisons between PCI and CABG groups in the SOS trial were by intention to treat. For patients with non-fatal/non-MACE, number of events per 100 patient years follow-up and duration of hospital stay were assessed. Competing risk analysis was used to illustrate temporal pattern of adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

During 2 y median follow up, 1 one or more adverse event occurred in 47.3% (231) of the PCI group and 53% (265) of the CABG group (p=0.086). Non-fatal/non-MACE occurred in 11.9% of the PCI group and 38.6% of the CABG group (p<0.001). Non-fatal/non-MACE per 100 patient years follow-up was 17.49 (PCI) and 35.04 (CABG), rate ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.4, p<0.001. Cumulative non-fatal/non-MACE associated hospital stays were 1387 and 3287 days in PCI and CABG groups respectively. Median duration of hospitalisation per non-fatal/non-MACE was 5 days (interquartile range 2 to 11.75 days) in the PCI group and 6 days (interquartile range 2 to 12 days) in the CABG group, p=0.245.

CONCLUSIONS

CABG had lower cumulative incidence of fatal or MACE outcomes, higher cumulative incidence of non-fatal/non-MACE outcomes, and longer cumulative hospitalisation periods compared to the PCI group.

The shortcomings of clinical practice guidelines

Accumulation of medical knowledge related to diagnosis and management over the last 5-6 decades has altered the course of diseases, improved clinical outcomes and increased survival. Thus, it has become difficult for the practicing physician to evaluate the long-term effects of a particular therapy on survival of an individual patient. Further, the approach by each physician to an individual patient with the same disease is not always uniform. In an attempt to assist physicians in applying newly acquired knowledge to patients, clinical practice guidelines were introduced by various scientific societies. Guidelines assist in facilitating the translation of new research discoveries into clinical practice; however, despite the improvements over the years, there are still several issues related to guidelines that often appear ‘lost in translation'. Guidelines are based on the results of randomized clinical trials, other nonrandomized studies, and expert opinion (i.e. the opinion of most members of the guideline committees). The merits and limitations of randomized clinical trials, guideline committees, and presentation of guidelines will be discussed. In addition, proposals to improve guidelines will be presented.

Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective

AIMS

Recent cost-effectiveness analyses of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been limited by a short time horizon or were restricted to the US healthcare perspective. We, therefore, used individual patient-level data from the SYNTAX trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PCI versus CABG from a European (Dutch) perspective.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2007, 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease were randomised to either CABG (n=897) or PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES; n=903). Costs were estimated for all patients based on observed healthcare resource usage over 5 years of follow-up. Health state utilities were evaluated with the EuroQOL questionnaire. A patient-level microsimulation model based on Dutch life-tables was used to extrapolate the 5-year in-trial data to a lifetime horizon. Although initial procedural costs were lower for CABG, total initial hospitalisation costs per patient were higher (€17 506 vs €14 037, p<0.001). PCI was more costly during the next 5 years of follow-up, due to more frequent hospitalisations, repeat revascularisation procedures and higher medication costs. Nevertheless, total 5-year costs remained €2465/patient higher with CABG. When the in-trial results were extrapolated to a lifetime horizon, CABG was projected to be economically attractive relative to DES-PCI, with gains in both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (€5390/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained) was favourable and remained <€80 000/QALY in >90% of the bootstrap replicates. Outcomes were similar when incorporating the prognostic impact of non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke, as well as across a broad range of assumptions regarding the effect of CABG on post-trial survival and costs. However, DES-PCI was economically dominant compared with CABG in patients with a SYNTAX Score ≤22 or in those with left main disease. In patients for whom the SYNTAX Score II favoured PCI based on lower predicted 4-year mortality, PCI was also economically dominant, whereas in those patients for whom the SYNTAX Score II favoured surgery, CABG was highly economically attractive (ICER range, €2967 to €3737/QALY gained).

CONCLUSIONS

For the broad population with three-vessel or left main disease who are candidates for either CABG or PCI, we found that CABG is a clinically and economically attractive revascularisation strategy compared with DES-PCI from a Dutch healthcare perspective. The cost-effectiveness of CABG versus PCI differed according to several anatomic factors, however. The newly developed SYNTAX Score II provides enhanced prognostic discrimination in this population, and may be a useful tool to guide resource allocation as well.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical trial unique identifier: NCT00114972 (http://www.clinical-trials.gov).

Role of CT Coronary Angiography in Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is considered as the most challenging frontier in interventional cardiology and the last one to be conquered. With availability of state of the art hardware, wires and catheters in particular and increased skills of the operators, the success rate for recanalization of CTO by percutaneous catheter intervention (PCI) has improved. Yet the complications rate and longterm adverse events are high, mostly due to failure in tracking or navigation of hardware through the occluded CTO segment, prolonged exposure to radiation and high doses of contrast used. Therefore, proper selection of patient is of utmost importance. One of the major challenges for successful CTO recanalization is satisfactory visualization of the occluded CTO segment. Conventional invasive catheterization fails to fill the gap and the shortcomings and handicaps of such invasive imaging can be resolved with the use of non-invasive CT coronary angiography (CTCA). CTCA helps to better define the morphological features of the occluded CTO segment, which are established predictors of success, like the actual length of the occluded segment and any calcification or tortuosity in its course. Integration of reconstructed three-dimensional CT coronary images with twodimensional fluoroscopic images, offers directional guide to select the best angiographic plane for visualization of angiographically “missing segment”. With advances in CT technology, CTCA has now become an established technology for pre-procedure evaluation of CTO segment, thereby help in planning and execution of successful PCI.

Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Intervention-Which Is Better in Multivessel Coronary Disease: Lessons From SYNTAX and Beyond

The landmark Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial has aided in reducing the area of uncertainty in decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with complex coronary artery disease. As part of the SYNTAX Trial, quantification of the coronary artery disease burden was prospectively undertaken by the Heart Team - consisting of at least an interventional cardiologist and cardiac surgeon - utilising the anatomical SYNTAX Score (www.syntaxscore.com) as a clinical tool in order to agree that equivalent anatomical revascularisation could be achieved. The anatomical SYNTAX Score is now advocated in both European and US revascularisation guidelines to guide decision-making between CABG and PCI as part of the SYNTAX pioneered Heart Team approach. In addition, the SYNTAX Trial has lead to the development and validation of the SYNTAX Score II, in which the anatomical SYNTAX Score was augmented with clinical variables, to allow for more objective and tailored decision making for the individual patient. Prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II tool is currently ongoing in the SYNTAX II (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02015832) and EXCEL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01205776) trials. The present paper presents lessons learned from SYNTAX, including the development and/or validation of several SYNTAX based clinical tools, and the potential implications for current and future clinical practice.

Optimal approaches to diabetic patients with multivessel disease

The pathophysiology of diabetes and systemic insulin resistance contributes to the nature of diffuse atherosclerosis and a high prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients. The optimal approach to this patient population remains a subject of an ongoing discussion. In this review, we give an overview of the unique pathophysiology of CAD in patients with diabetes, summarize the current state of therapies available, and compare modalities of revascularization that have been investigated in recent clinical trials. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a comprehensive heart team approach to every patient while accommodating both patient preference and quality-of-life decisions.

Analysis of the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation trial using a multistate model of clinical outcomes

Current cardiovascular randomized trials typically use composite outcomes. We hypothesized that the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) outcomes and conclusions would differ using a multistate model relative to the intervention for the composite outcome of death (D) and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). We used a multistate model which uses transition paths to simultaneously assess multiple end points. Using the 10-year follow-up BARI data, we post hoc analyzed outcomes according to 3 transition paths: (1) from intervention to MI; (2) from intervention to death; and (3) from MI to death. Of 1,829 patients randomized to the intervention of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 700 (38%) experienced the composite event D/MI which included 230 (13%) nonfatal MI and 470 (26%) death without antecedent nonfatal MI, whereas 79 of 230 (34%) experienced death after nonfatal MI. Outcomes of the 3 individual transition paths were analyzed by a multistate model. In contrast to standard survival analyses, after adjustment for baseline clinical covariates, outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or CABG were not significantly different for intervention to MI (p = 0.33) or intervention to death (p = 0.23), but MI to death favored CABG (p = 0.02). Deconstruction of the BARI data using a multistate model identifies a significant difference in individual transition-stage outcomes and therefore trial conclusions in contrast to the standard methods of survival analysis. These observations suggest multistate models should be considered in the design and analysis of randomized cardiovascular trials which use composite outcomes.

Comparison of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes

OPINION STATEMENT

The optimal revascularization strategy in patients with diabetes is controversial. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial, done more than a decade ago, suggested a mortality benefit of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (with plain old balloon angioplasty) in the subgroup of patients with diabetes. In addition, several observational studies and meta-analyses similarly suggest a benefit of CABG over PCI in patients with diabetes. However, most of these studies compared CABG with PCI using balloon angioplasty, bare metal stents, or first-generation drug-eluting stents. In this review, we critically examine the data for optimal revascularization strategy in patients with diabetes and ask the question whether the currently available data from randomized trials that used outdated stents are applicable to current day practice.