Management of anticoagulation before and after elective surgery

Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing inpatient total knee arthroplasty: A matched analysis

Background

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often require lifetime anticoagulation using drugs such as Warfarin and Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC). It is important to assess the impact that prior anticoagulant use has on the post-operative complications in patients with AF undergoing TKA.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the PearlDiver database querying all patients who underwent an inpatient TKA. Patients who had AF and filled a prescription for at least 30 days of either Warfarin or a DOAC were matched to control cohorts. Medical and surgical complications 30 and 90 days post-operatively were compared between the two groups.

Results

4396 patients made up the group with AF on warfarin, while 5383 patients made up the cohort with AF on DOAC and their corresponding controls. Patients on anticoagulation had more AKI (OR 2.70, OR: 2.37), pneumonia (OR: 2.89, OR: 2.46), MI (OR: 2.70, OR: 3.14), transfusion (OR: 6.94, OR: 3.16), sepsis (OR: 2.47, OR: 1.96), and aseptic loosening at 90 days (OR: 17.06, OR:7.01). However, PE (OR: 3.32) and hematoma (OR: 1.71) were only higher in the warfarin cohort. TKA instability was higher in the DOAC cohort (OR: 6.00). Conversely, patients in the control group exhibited more wound dehiscence compared to the warfarin group (OR: 0.28), and higher rates of revision surgery compared to both the DOAC (OR:0.27) and Warfarin (OR:0.31) groups at 90 days.

Conclusion

Patients on DOAC and Warfarin for AF, and undergoing TKA are exposed to a higher risk of post-operative complications.

Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Outcomes After Elective Surgery in Preoperatively Anticoagulated Patients

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the incidence and timing of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in anticoagulated patients undergoing elective surgery.

METHODS

Using institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, we identified patients receiving preoperative anticoagulation undergoing elective surgery between 2011 and 2021. Medical records review supplemented National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to detail complication and anticoagulation type and timing. Outcomes for postoperative hemorrhage, acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 1442 patients met inclusion criteria, and 84 patients (5.8%) experienced 1 or more complications. There were 4 CVA (0.3%), 16 VTE (1.1%), and 68 bleeding (4.7%) events postoperatively. Three patients (75%) with CVA, 10 patients (62.5%) with VTE, and 18 patients (26.5%) with postoperative bleeding had resumed therapeutic anticoagulation before the complication. In terms of long-term sequelae in the CVA cohort, there was 1 mortality (25%), and an additional patient (25%) continues to experience long-term physical and mild cognitive impairments. Patients who experienced postoperative VTE required only anticoagulation adjustments. In patients who experienced bleeding complications, 6 (8.8%) required intensive care unit admissions, and there was 1 mortality (1.5%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the increased use of anticoagulation over time, balancing postoperative bleeding and thrombotic risks remains challenging. Bleeding complications were most common in preoperatively anticoagulated patients undergoing elective surgery. Earlier postoperative resumption of anticoagulation is unlikely to prevent thrombotic events as 65% of patients had already resumed therapeutic anticoagulation.

Inferior vena cava filter use at a large community hospital: a retrospective cohort study

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are considered when patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) develop a contraindication to anticoagulation. Use of IVC filters is increasing, despite associated complications and lack of data on efficacy in reducing VTE-related mortality. We characterized the pattern of IVC filter use at a large community hospital between 2018 and 2022. Specifically, we assessed the indications for IVC filter insertion, filter removal rates, and filter-associated complications. Indications for IVC filters were compared to those outlined by current clinical practice guidelines. We reviewed 120 consecutive filter placement events. The most common indications included recent VTE and active bleeding (40.0%) or need for anticoagulation interruption for surgery (25.8%). Approximately one-third (30.0%) of IVC filters were inserted for indications either not supported or addressed by guidelines. Half (50.0%) of patients had successful removal of their IVC filter. At least 13 patients (10.8%) experienced a filter-related complication. In a large community-based practice, nearly one-third of IVC filters were inserted for indications not universally supported by current practice guidelines. Moreover, most IVC filters were not removed, raising the risk of filter-associated complications, and supporting the need for development of comprehensive guidelines addressing use of IVC filters, and post-insertion monitoring practices.

Clinical Correlates of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

Background: It is reasonable to place an Inferior Vena Cava Filter (IVCF) when an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs occurs in a patient with absolute contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation. An additional potential reason for placing an IVCF is the need to stop therapeutic anticoagulation in a patient with acute DVT who must undergo urgent non-deferrable surgery. However, IVCFs are often used outside of such established indications and many authors argue about their actual utility, especially in terms of survival. In this retrospective study, we looked for clinical correlates of in-hospital mortality among patients who underwent IVCF placement, limiting our analysis to the cases for which a correct indication to IVCF placement existed. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic database of our University Hospital, searching for consecutive hospitalized patients who had acute DVT and underwent IVCF placement because of an established contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation and/or because it was necessary to stop anticoagulation due to urgent surgery. The search covered the period between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Results: The search resulted in the identification of 168 individuals. An established contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation was present in 116 patients (69.0%), while urgent non-deferrable surgery was the reason for IVCF placement in 52 patients (31.0%). A total of 24 patients (14.3%) died during the same hospital stay in which the IVCF was placed. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with a contraindication to anticoagulation than in patients who underwent IVCF placement because of urgent surgery (19.0% vs. 3.8%, OD 5.85 vs. 0.17). In-hospital mortality was also significantly higher among patients with chronic kidney disease and those who needed blood cell transfusion during hospitalization. Conclusions: This study provides novel information on clinical correlates of in-hospital mortality among patients with acute DVT who undergo IVCF. Prospective observational studies are needed to substantiate these findings.

Characteristics of Ischemic Stroke Despite Oral Anticoagulant Use For Atrial Fibrillation

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) prevents stroke in atrial fibrillation, yet a residual stroke risk remains. In this single-center retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke patients despite OAC, suboptimal OAC treatment is common (30%: inappropriate dosing (17%); patient non-adherence (13%)). Other causes of stroke included OAC interruption (14.5%), a competing stroke mechanism (11.0%), and undetermined breakthrough stroke in 44.5%. Overall, easily modifiable causes of ischemic stroke despite OAC are common. Accordingly, strategies to improve treatment compliance, including appropriate dosing along with guideline-based risk factor and periprocedural OAC management, should be emphasized to improve secondary stroke prevention in this patient population.

An evidence-based review of optimal perioperative practices in minor hand surgery

BACKGROUND

Like many surgical subspecialties, there have been frequent advancements and discoveries in the field of hand and upper extremity surgery. With a rapidly growing literature base, it can be difficult to remain updated on the latest recommendations.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was completed on PubMed using MeSH terms. Topics included nutrition management, anticoagulation, immunosuppressive medication management, antibiotic use, skin preparation, splinting, tourniquet use, and suture choice. Data from articles with a level of evidence 1A-3 C were included.

RESULTS

A total of 42 articles were identified and reviewed to provide evidence for recommendations regarding various aspects of pre-, intra-, and post-operative care.

CONCLUSIONS

The objective of this manuscript is to serve as a resource for evidence-based recommendations by the findings of recent evidence related to perioperative care in elective hand surgery. Additional studies are required in certain areas of the literature in order to provide stronger recommendations.

Assessing the safety of continued perioperative antithrombotic therapy in endoscopic airway surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis

Purpose

Given the increasing utilization of endoscopic surgery, particularly for airway stenosis management in the era of COVID-19 due to prolonged intubation, it is important to examine whether continuing antithrombotic therapy perioperatively influences bleeding complications. We examined the impact of perioperative antithrombotic use on postoperative bleeding complications following endoscopic airway surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study from January 2016 to December 2021 of cases of patients ≥18 years who underwent endoscopic airway surgery for posterior glottic, subglottic, and tracheal stenosis at a single institution. Cases were excluded if they were an open airway surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative bleeding complications across cases of patients naive to and on baseline antithrombotic therapy, and those with preoperative continuation versus cessation of antithrombotic therapy.

Results

258 cases across 96 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these 258 cases, 43.4 % (n = 112) were performed for patients on baseline antithrombotic therapy and 56.6 % (n = 146) for those not on antithrombotic therapy. Likelihood of perioperative continuation of apixaban was 0.052 (odds ratio, 95 % Confidence Interval: 0.002–0.330, p < 0.001). Likelihood of perioperative continuation of aspirin was 9.87 (odds ratio, 95 % Confidence Interval: 2.32–43.0, p < 0.001). Two instances of postoperative bleeding were found: both in patients who were on aspirin without perioperative cessation for COVID-related coagulopathy.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that perioperative continuation of aspirin is relatively safe in the setting of endoscopic surgery for airway stenosis management. Prospective investigations to increase understanding of perioperative antithrombotics for COVID-related coagulopathy are warranted.

Carpal tunnel release under wide awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous shunt

INTRODUCTION

Long-term hemodialysis patients experience many hand diseases caused by dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) being the most common. For the patients with arteriovenous (AV) shunt, surgical decompression remains challenging because of the contraindications of a tourniquet. A technique called wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT), in which epinephrine provides hemostasis instead of the tourniquet, can be a good option for hemodialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of CTS and related factors in hemodialysis patients, and to establish the efficacy and safety of WALANT on hemodialysis patients with AV shunt.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 275 hemodialysis patients between March 2013 and July 2019. 43 patients were diagnosed with CTS, involving surgical treatment on 70 wrists. We performed mini-open carpal tunnel release using WALANT on the AV shunt arm (defined as the WALANT group), while using lidocaine and a tourniquet on the arm without an AV shunt (defined as the tourniquet group). The operative time, surgical field bleeding (blood loss and hemostasis score), surgical pain (injection pain and tourniquet pain), outcomes, complications, and satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of CTS in hemodialysis patients was 15.6%. Longer dialysis durations were related to higher proportions of patients with CTS. There was no significant difference in blood loss (p=0.184) and hemostasis score (p=0.165) between the two groups. Clinical symptoms improved in all patients, and there were no severe complications. The WALANT group had a significantly longer preparation time of approximately 20minutes, but they had low injection pain and no tourniquet pain. There was also no significant difference in terms of satisfaction levels (p=0.212).

DISCUSSION

CTS is a very common disease among hemodialysis patients. WALANT provided sufficient hemostasis without a tourniquet, despite the patients' high bleeding tendency. The technique also had the advantages of low injection pain, no tourniquet pain, and no major complications. In this respect, WALANT can be a good choice for hemodialysis patients with AV shunt.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Perioperative Anticoagulation Management

Management of anticoagulation in individuals undergoing operative procedures is a complex situation. Each case should be assessed individually with proper risk assessment, monitoring, and plan for perioperative and postoperative anticoagulation. Clinical evidence for the management of these patients is relatively scarce, and clinicians are often assessing each individual case with minimal guidance. This review provides nurses with a summary of available literature on the assessment, laboratory monitoring, timing of adjusting anticoagulation, and bridging prior to procedures. In addition to general perioperative anticoagulation management, this review discusses perioperative management in special populations and provides a summary on principles when anticoagulation should be resumed following a procedure.

Risk factors for bleeding after dental extractions in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs - A case control study

Background/purpose

Patients receiving antithrombotic drugs are more likely to suffer bleeding after tooth extraction and multiple factors are related to it. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of bleeding and risk factors for bleeding after dental extractions in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs.

Materials and methods

This retrospective case control study included patients receiving oral antithrombotic drugs or not. Tooth extractions were conducted under ECG monitoring and local hemostatic measures were performed. Risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after tooth extraction were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Bleeding events were reported in 27 (27%) patients receiving antithrombotic drugs and 9 (9%) patients who didn't use antithrombotic drugs, the difference between which was significant (p < 0.01). Univariate analyses showed that age (OR = 2.717, p = 0.028), oral hygiene (OR = 4.110, p = 0.043), inferior nerve block (OR = 4.285, p = 0.038) and number of extracted tooth (OR = 4.758, p = 0.029) were significantly correlate with bleeding incidence. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR = 2.824, p = 0.036) and number of extracted tooth (OR = 5.268, p = 0.016) were significant risk factors for postextraction bleeding.

Conclusion

The results suggest that there is higher incidence of postextraction bleeding in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs compared to patients who don't. Age (>75 years), oral hygiene, inferior nerve block and number of extracted tooth may be related to bleeding after tooth extraction.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Spinal Surgery Does Not Impact Patient Safety–A Single Center Cohort Study

Objective

Antithrombotic therapy is common in older patients to avoid thromboembolic events. Careful planning is required, particularly in the perioperative environment. There are no clearly date guidelines on the best timing for interrupting the use of anticoagulation in the case of spinal surgery. This study evaluates early per procedural clinical outcomes in patients whose antithrombotic therapy was interrupted for spinal surgery.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent dorsal instrumentation from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 were included. In group A, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were suspended for 5 days and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for 3 days. In group B, antiplatelet agents (APA) were paused for at least 7 days before surgery to prevent perioperative bleeding. Patients not taking anticoagulation medication were gathered into control group C. We analyzed demographic data, ASA status, blood loss, comorbidities, duration of surgery, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, complications, thromboembolism, and 30 day in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analyses from the three groups were further analyzed and conducted.

Results

A total of 217 patients were operated and included. Twenty-eight patients taking VKA/DOAC (group A), 37 patients using APA (group B), and 152 patients without anticoagulation (group C) underwent spinal surgery. Those using anticoagulants were significantly older and often with multimorbidity, but did not differ significantly in procedural bleeding, time of surgery, length of hospital stay, complication rate, thromboembolism, or 30 day in-hospital mortality (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Our data show that dorsal instrumentation safely took place in patients whose antithrombotic therapy was interrupted.

Perioperative consultative hematology: can you clear my patient for a procedure?

Periprocedural management of antithrombotics is a common but challenging clinical scenario that renders patients vulnerable to potential adverse events such as bleeding and thrombosis. Over the past decade, periprocedural antithrombotic approaches have changed considerably with the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), as well as a paradigm shift away from bridging in many warfarin patients. Successfully navigating this high-risk period relies on a number of individualized patient assessments conducted within a framework of standardized, systematic approaches. It also requires a thorough understanding of antithrombotic pharmacokinetics, multidisciplinary coordination of care, and comprehensive patient education and empowerment. In this article, we provide clinicians with a practical, stepwise approach to periprocedural management of antithrombotic agents through case-based examples of relevant clinical scenarios.

Endocrine Surgery: Management of Postoperative Complications Following Endocrine Surgery of the Neck

Cervical endocrine operations include parathyroidectomy, thyroid lobectomy, thyroidectomy, central neck dissection, and lateral neck dissection. The vital structures at risk include the recurrent laryngeal nerves to the intrinsic muscles of the larynx, additional cranial nerves, parathyroid glands essential for calcium homeostasis, aerodigestive structures, and great vessels. Here, the authors discuss complications of endocrine neck surgery, including cervical hematoma and other fluid collections, hypocalcemia from hypoparathyroidism, and nerve injuries, along with their prevention, mitigation, and management. Significant and permanent morbidity can result, but fortunately the overall rate of complications remains low, especially when surgery is performed by high-volume surgeons.

Evaluation of International Normalized Ratio Thresholds for Complications in Hip Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Nailing: Analysis of 15,323 Cases

INTRODUCTION

In hip fracture patients with elevated international normalized ratios (INRs), the risks of delaying surgery for correction of INR are controversial. We examined the association of (1) preoperative INR values and (2) surgical delay with postoperative complications after intramedullary nailing of hip fractures.

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we retrospectively identified patients that underwent intramedullary nailing for hip fractures from 2005 to 2016. Patients aged older than 55 years with preoperative INR recorded ≤1 day before surgery were included. Patients were stratified into five cohorts-(1) INR ≤ 1.0, (2) 1 < INR ≤ 1.25 (INR [1 to 1.25]), (3) 1.25 < INR ≤ 1.5 (INR [1.25 to 1.5]), (4) 1.5 < INR ≤ 2.0 (INR [1.5 to 2.0]), and (5) INR > 2.0. The primary outcomes of interest were postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion, surgical site infection, and 30-day mortality. Multivariate regression analysis was done to adjust for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

In total, 15,323 patients were included in this analysis. Adjusting for potential confounders, INR [1 to 1.25], INR [1.25 to 1.5], and INR [1.5 to 2.0] were associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.501, P < 0.001; aOR: 2.226, P < 0.001; aOR: 2.524, P < 0.001, respectively) and surgical delay >48 hours (aOR: 1.655, P < 0.001; aOR: 3.434, P < 0.001; aOR: 2.382, P < 0.001, respectively). The INR > 2.0 cohort was not associated with mortality (P = 0.181) or surgical delay (P = 0.529). Surgical delay was associated with mortality (aOR: 1.531, P = 0.004). The INR > 2.0 cohort was associated with increased rate of transfusions (aOR: 1.388, P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Elevated preoperative INR value within 1 day of surgery between 1.0 and 2.0 was associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality and surgical delay >48 hour, which may represent attempts at INR correction. An INR greater than 2.0 was not associated with mortality or surgical delay but was associated with increased transfusions. Surgical delay was independently associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. We therefore recommend that INR reversal be attempted but not delay surgical fixation of geriatric hip fractures over 48 hours and counsel patients and their families regarding the risks of surgery with elevated INR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic-level III/retrospective cohort study.

Managing Anticoagulant Patients Undergoing Dental Extraction by using Hemostatic Agent: Tranexamic Acid Mouthrinse

Background:

Patient who is on antiplatelet therapy had an impaired fibrin formation which leads to fibrinolysis which is the main reason behind postextraction bleeding.

Objectives:

The aim of the study is to manage anticoagulated patient who has to undergo dental extraction by using hemostatic agent and the objective is to rule out potential risk factor which may trigger bleeding.

Methods:

One hundred patients with anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy and having International Normalized Ratio (INR) in-between 1.9 and 3.5 were selected. Postextraction instruction use 5 ml of 10% tranexamic acid mouthrinse four times a day for next 7 days was suggested. All demographic data, history of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, details of bleeding, and treatment requirement were recorded to identify potential risk factor.

Results:

Of 100 subjects, 16 were reported postextraction bleeding on days 1 and 2 which was controlled by tranexamic acid pressure pack. Bleeding from extraction socket of 10 patients was stopped by gelatin foam. No life-threatening risk was observed. In patients with age group of 41–60 years whose INR value was ≥2.5, the number of teeth undergoing extraction, whose bleeding time was increased, and were on long duration of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy might increase the risk of bleeding.

Conclusion:

Use of tranexamic acid mouthrinse after extraction is an effective way to control bleeding on patients who are under antiplatelet therapy with at therapeutic INR level is a secure and allowable method of minimizing postextraction oozing.

Postoperative low molecular weight heparin bridging treatment for patients at high risk of arterial thromboembolism (PERIOP2): double blind randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of dalteparin postoperative bridging treatment versus placebo for patients with atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valves when warfarin is temporarily interrupted for a planned procedure.

DESIGN

Prospective, double blind, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

10 thrombosis research sites in Canada and India between February 2007 and March 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

1471 patients aged 18 years or older with atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valves who required temporary interruption of warfarin for a procedure.

INTERVENTION

Random assignment to dalteparin (n=821; one patient withdrew consent immediately after randomisation) or placebo (n=650) after the procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Major thromboembolism (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, peripheral embolism, or vascular death) and major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria within 90 days of the procedure.

RESULTS

The rate of major thromboembolism within 90 days was 1.2% (eight events in 650 patients) for placebo and 1.0% (eight events in 820 patients) for dalteparin (P=0.64, risk difference -0.3%, 95% confidence interval -1.3 to 0.8). The rate of major bleeding was 2.0% (13 events in 650 patients) for placebo and 1.3% (11 events in 820 patients) for dalteparin (P=0.32, risk difference -0.7, 95% confidence interval -2.0 to 0.7). The results were consistent for the atrial fibrillation and mechanical heart valves groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valves who had warfarin interrupted for a procedure, no significant benefit was found for postoperative dalteparin bridging to prevent major thromboembolism.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00432796.

Factor Xa inhibitors: critical considerations for clinical development and testing

The selection of factor (F) X and its activated protease FXa for targeted inhibition to prevent and treat thrombotic conditions is based on an understanding of coagulation biochemistry, sequential steps that occur on tissue factor bearing cells and the interface of coagulation proteins, platelets, mononuclear cells and the nuclear constituents of inflammatory cells. The goal for developing direct oral FXa inhibitors was to achieve rapid, selective, predictable, safe and effective anticoagulation across a broad group of patients expected to derive benefit. The history and development in patient care are exemplars of knowledge, translation and collaboration between the public and private sectors.

Preoperative Platelet and International Normalized Ratio Thresholds and Risk of Complications After Primary Hip Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

A paucity of data exists on safe platelet and international normalized ratio (INR) thresholds for hip fracture surgery. Recent work has called into question the safety of preoperative INRs < 1.5 for total knee arthroplasty, and optimal platelet thresholds are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with thrombocytopenia or elevated INRs undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing surgical treatment of a native hip fracture from 2012 to 2017 (N = 86,850). Patient demographic, laboratory, and complication data were collected. Patients with preoperative platelet counts or INRs within one day of surgery were included for analysis. Preoperative platelet counts and INRs were divided into four groups (<50 k/μL, ≥50 k to 100 k/μL, ≥100 k to 150 k/μL, ≥150 k/μL, and ≤1.0, >1.0 to 1.5, >1.5 to 2.0, and >2.0, respectively). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the independent association between platelet count and INR on bleeding complications requiring transfusion, wound complications, reoperations, readmissions, and deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 72,306 and 56,027 patients were included for analysis of preoperative platelet and INR levels, respectively. In reference to platelet levels ≥150 k/μL, a notably increased risk of bleeding events was observed for patients with platelet counts ≥100 k to 150 k/μL (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.27), ≥50 to 100 k/μL (OR 1.85, 1.69 to 2.03), and <50 k/μL (OR 1.60, 1.25 to 2.04). Decreasing platelet counts were associated with a stepwise increased risk of mortality from OR 1.12 (1.02 to 1.22) for platelet counts ≥100 k to 150 k/μL to OR 1.63 (1.41 to 1.90) and OR 1.59 (1.06 to 2.39) for platelet counts ≥50 k to 100 k/μL and <50 k/μL, respectively. Elevated INR was associated with an increased risk of reoperations, readmissions, and death (P < 0.001 for all), with largest effect sizes observed starting at INRs >1.5.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study suggest that preoperative platelet thresholds of <100,000/μL and INR thresholds of 1.5 serve as an important risk factor for complications after hip fracture surgery. Future work is warranted to determine whether preoperative platelet transfusions and/or INR reversal will improve outcomes for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Management of individuals with bleeding or thrombotic disorders undergoing abortion

Individuals who have bleeding disorders, thrombophilias, a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), or who are taking anticoagulation medication for other reasons may present for abortion. Clinicians should be aware of risk factors and histories concerning for excessive bleeding and thrombotic disorders around the time of abortion. This document will focus on how to approach abortion planning in these individuals. For first-trimester abortion, procedural abortion (sometimes called surgical abortion) is generally preferred over medical management for individuals with bleeding disorders or who are on anticoagulation. First-trimester procedural abortion in an individual on anticoagulation can generally be done without interruption of anticoagulation. The decision to interrupt anticoagulation for a second-trimester procedure should be individualized. Individuals at high risk for VTE can be offered anticoagulation post-procedure. Individuals with bleeding disorders or who are anticoagulated can safely be offered progestin intrauterine devices. Future research is needed to better assess quantitative blood loss and complications rates with abortion in these populations.

Neurologic complications of nonrheumatic valvular heart disease

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is frequently associated with neurologic complications. Cerebral embolism is the most common, since thrombus formation results from the abnormalities in the valvular surfaces and the anatomic and physiologic changes associated with valve dysfunction, including atrial or ventricular enlargement, intracardiac thrombi, and cardiac dysrhythmias. Prosthetic heart valves, particularly mechanical valves, are very thrombogenic, which explains the high risk of thromboembolism and the need for long-term anticoagulation. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a nonoperative alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with intermediate or high surgical risk, and the procedure also has a risk of cerebral ischemia. In addition, anticoagulation, the mainstay of treatment to prevent cerebral embolism, has known potential for hemorrhagic complications. The emergence of new oral anticoagulants with similar effectiveness to warfarin and a better safety profile has facilitated the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. However, their application in patients with mechanical heart valves is still evolving. The prevention and management of these complications requires an understanding of their natural history to balance the risks posed by valvular heart disease, as well as the risks and benefits associated with the treatment.

Day case locked anterior plating for distal radial fractures is safe with uninterrupted antithrombotic therapy

We undertook a matched prospective cohort study over a 4-year period to examine the safety of continuing the administration of regular antithrombotic treatment with warfarin, clopidogrel or aspirin during day case surgical fixation of distal radial fractures. One hundred and one patients were identified and consented to participate in this study. There was only one reported complication: a superficial wound infection treated with antibiotics. No episodes of excessive bleeding were noted intraoperatively. All patients were discharged home on the day of surgery and there were no episodes of readmission, significant bleeding, haematoma requiring intervention, compartment syndrome or wound dehiscence. Complication rates were comparable with those of the matched cohort of patients undergoing the same procedure but who were not taking antithrombotic medications.Level of evidence: IV.

Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature

Twenty percent of patients with Cancer Associated Thrombosis receive an inferior vena cava filter annually. Insertion is guided by practice guidelines, which do not specify or discuss the use of inferior vena cava filters in malignancy. Adherence to these guidelines is known to be variable. We aimed to see if there was consistent management of venous thromboembolism among Medical Oncologists/Haematologists and Respiratory Physicians, with respect to inferior vena cava filter use in the setting of suspected and confirmed malignancy. Medical Oncologists, Haematologists and Respiratory Physicians were surveyed with four theoretical cases. Case 1 concerns a patient who develops a pulmonary embolism following spinal surgery. Cases 2 and 4 explore the use of inferior vena cava filters in the setting of malignancy. Case 3 covers the role of inferior vena cava filters in recurrent thrombosis despite systemic anticoagulation. There were 56 responses, 32 (57%) Respiratory Physicians and 24 (43%) Haematologists/Oncologists. Respiratory Physicians were significantly more likely to insert an inferior vena cava filter in case 1 (p = 0.04) whilst Haematologists/Medical Oncologists were more likely to insert an inferior vena cava filter in case 3 (p = 0.03). No significant differences were found in cases 2 and 4. There were significant disparities in terms of type and timing of anticoagulation. Consistency of recommendations with guidelines was variable likely in part because guidelines are themselves inconsistent. The heterogeneity in responses highlights the variations in venous thromboembolism management, especially in Cancer Associated Thrombosis. International Societies should consider addressing inferior vena cava filter use specifically in the setting of Cancer Associated Thrombosis. Collaboration between interested specialities would assist in developing consistent, evidence-based guidelines for the use of inferior vena cava filters in the management of venous thromboembolism.

Inferior vena cava filters: a framework for evidence-based use

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Although most patients can be managed safely with anticoagulation, inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) represent an important alternative to anticoagulation in a small subset of patients. IVCF use has expanded exponentially with the advent of retrievable filters. Indications for IVCFs have liberalized despite limited evidence supporting this practice. Because indiscriminate use of IVCFs can be associated with net patient harm, knowledge of the risks and benefits of these devices is essential to optimal evidence-based practice. Patients with acute VTE and absolute contraindications to anticoagulation or major complications from anticoagulation are universally agreed indications for IVCFs. However, the reliance on IVCFs for primary VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients is not substantiated by the available literature. This review examines trends in IVCF use, practice-based recommendations on IVCF use in various clinical scenarios, complications associated with indwelling IVCFs, and indications for IVCF retrieval.

Development of an Institutional Periprocedural Management Guideline for Oral Anticoagulants

Patients on oral anticoagulation commonly undergo surgery or other invasive procedures. Periprocedural management of oral anticoagulants involves a careful balance of the thromboembolic risk and bleeding risk. To standardize clinical practice at our institution, we developed a guideline for periprocedural management for patients taking oral anticoagulants that incorporates published data and expert opinion. In this article, we present our clinical practice guideline as a decision support tool to aid clinicians in developing a consistent strategy for managing periprocedural anticoagulation and for safely bridging anticoagulation in patients who require it.

Markedly increased risk of postoperative bleeding complications during perioperative bridging anticoagulation in general and visceral surgery

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of patients receiving oral anticoagulants are undergoing elective surgery. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently applied as bridging therapy during perioperative interruption of anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to explore the postoperative bleeding risk of patients receiving surgery under bridging anticoagulation.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective two-arm matched cohort study. Patients that received perioperative bridging anticoagulation were compared to a matched control group with identical surgical procedure, age, and sex. Emergency and vascular operations were excluded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were minor postoperative bleeding, thromboembolic events, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis explored risk factors of major postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients in each study arm were analyzed. The patient cohort included the entire field of general and visceral surgery including a large proportion of major oncological resections. Bridging anticoagulation increased the postoperative incidence of major bleeding events (8% vs. 1%; p < 0.001) as well as minor bleeding events (14% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Thromboembolic events were equally rare in both groups (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.45). No effect on mortality was observed (1.5% vs. 1.9%). Independent risk factors of major postoperative bleeding were full-therapeutic dose of LMWH, renal insufficiency, and the procedure-specific bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative bridging anticoagulation, especially full-therapeutic dose LMWH, markedly increases the risk of postoperative bleeding complications in general and visceral surgery. Surgeons should carefully consider the practice of routine bridging.

Inferior vena cava filter – comprehensive overview of current indications, techniques, complications and retrieval rates

Summary: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter has been used to manage patients with pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Its ease of use and the expansion of relative indications have led to a dramatic increase in IVC filter placement. However, IVC filters have been associated with a platitude of complications. Therefore, there exists a need to examine the current indications and identify the patient population at risk. In this paper, we comprehensively reviewed the current indications and techniques of IVC filter placement. Further, we examined the various complications associated with either permanent or retrievable IVC filters. Lastly, we examined the current data on filter retrieval.

The short-term outcome of residual thrombus of the lower extremity after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis

Background

This study aimed to assess the short-term effect of residual thrombus of the lower extremity after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) on the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and iliofemoral vein patency rate in patients who underwent PCDT.

Methods

There were 94 continuous patients with severe deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities admitted to our hospital between March 2016 and June 2018; 73 cases receiving PCDT and verified with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) were assigned into two groups. Thirty-nine patients without thrombus of the popliteal and infrapopliteal veins were assigned to the proximal DVT group. The remaining 34 cases were placed in the extensive DVT group. The thrombus scores, including venous registry index (VRI) score, Marder score, and Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) score before and after PCDT, the primary two years’ cumulative rate of iliofemoral patency, and the rate of PTS, and complications were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Ultimately, 27 patients in the proximal DVT group and 26 cases in the extensive DVT group completed the study. The two groups had no significant differences in terms of basic characteristics, complication and the rate of PTS (P>0.05). However, there were significant differences in terms of postoperative mean thrombus score and the mean degree of thrombosis removal score by Marder and SVS scores, residual thrombus by lower thrombosis classification (LET) and the two years’ cumulative iliofemoral vein patency rate (P<0.05). And the logistic regression analysis demonstrated the residual thrombus of LET class II [odds ratio (OR), 4.619, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.090–19.567, P=0.038] was an independent risk factor for iliofemoral vein occlusion.

Conclusions

The residual thrombus of LET class II is an independent risk factor for iliofemoral vein occlusion. It is very important to keep the patency of the popliteal vein when deciding to use a stent to maintain iliofemoral vein patency. Furthermore, the anterior tibial vein approach and crisscross technique may be two important alternative methods that can be used to address the thrombus of popliteal vein for patients with extensive DVT.

(S029) Managing therapeutic anticoagulation in bariatric surgery patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients that undergo bariatric surgery are at risk of bleeding. Some obesity-related comorbidities including venous thromboembolism and heart disease can often require therapeutic anticoagulation. Previous small institutional studies have demonstrated that bariatric surgery can be performed in this patient population. This study attempts to identify best practices in stopping and restarting therapeutic anticoagulation in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was completed of our institution's database using anticoagulant medications to identify patients on therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients not on therapeutic anticoagulation were excluded, as well as patients that were started on therapeutic anticoagulation only in the post-operative period or those whose anticoagulation was stopped and not restarted. Indications for anticoagulation were recorded, as well as patient demographics and comorbid conditions. The patient chart was examined for when anticoagulation was stopped before surgery, when it was restarted after surgery, and whether or not the patient was therapeutically bridged. Baseline and post-operative hemoglobin values were recorded, as well as bleeding events, transfusions, reoperation, length of stay, and readmissions. Binary variables were compared across groups using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, and continuous variables were analyzed using T test.

RESULTS

There were 2933 bariatric operations performed between January 1, 2012 and August 31, 2019. Of these patients, 64 were on therapeutic anticoagulation before and after the operation for one or more indications, including history of VTE (39), atrial fibrillation (27), clotting disorder (6), ventricular assist device (5), previous PCI (4), or mechanical valve (2). There were 4 (6.2%) patients that experienced bleeding events. All four patients were on Coumadin pre-operatively. Three patients experienced extraluminal bleeding, and one patient had intraluminal bleeding, and all events occurred within 72 h of the operation. All four patients had their anticoagulation restarted prior to the bleeding event becoming evident, with anticoagulation in these patients restarted an average of 1.25 days after surgery. There were no conditions that predisposed a patient to bleeding. There was no significant difference in amount of time anticoagulation was stopped before surgery in bleeding versus non-bleeding patients, and there appeared to be no increased risk of bleeding in patients that were on therapeutic bridging therapy. There were no thrombotic complications from the interruption in anticoagulation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery can be safely performed in patients on therapeutic anticoagulation, though this population is at greater risk for bleeding complications in the perioperative period. Meticulous hemostasis in the operating room is the most important aspect of preventing bleeding complications.

Perioperative outcomes of interrupted anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Background

This study aimed to investigate the incidences of and risk factors for perioperative events following anticoagulant discontinuation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Methods

A total of 216 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac consultation for suspending perioperative anticoagulants were enrolled. A perioperative event was defined as a composite of thromboembolism and major bleeding.

Results

The mean anticoagulant discontinuation duration was 5.7 (±4.2) days and was significantly longer in the warfarin group (p<0.001). Four perioperative thromboembolic (1.9%; three strokes and one systemic embolization) and three major bleeding events (1.4%) were observed. The high CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores and a prolonged preoperative anticoagulant discontinuation duration (4.4±2.1 vs. 2.9±1.8 days; p=0.028) were associated with perioperative events, whereas the anticoagulant type (non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin) was not. The best cut-off levels of the HAS-BLED and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were 3.5 and 2.5, respectively, and the preoperative anticoagulant discontinuation duration for predicting perioperative events was 2.5 days. Significant differences in the perioperative event rates were observed among the four risk groups categorized according to the sum of these values: risk 0, 0%; risk 1, 0%; risk 2, 5.9%; and risk 3, 50.0% (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the HAS-BLED score was an independent predictor for perioperative events.

Conclusion

Thromboembolic events and major bleeding are not uncommon during perioperative anticoagulant discontinuation in patients with NVAF, and interrupted anticoagulation strategies are needed to minimize these.

Impact of anticoagulants in elderly patients who suffer a hip fracture. Should we have a different approach?

Introduction:

Hip fracture in the elderly is a frequent problem. Chronic treatment with anticoagulants is common in these patients and may delay surgery.

Objectives:

To compare time to surgery, hospital stay, in-hospital and 90 days complications between anticoagulated and non-anticoagulated groups.

Methods:

Retrospective cohort of >64 years-old patients with acute hip fracture. Period June-2014 to December 2019. We estimated crude and adjusted Odds Ratio (95%CI) for in-hospital complications with logistic regression model. We report the crude and adjusted Hazard Ratio for readmission and 90-days mortality with Cox proportional hazards model.

Results:

Of the 1058 patients, 123 (11%) were anticoagulated. Time to surgery was 26.4 hours (IIQ 13.9-48) in anticoagulated and 24 hours (IIQ 2.3-48) in non-anticoagulated, p 0.001. Hospital stay was 7 days (IIQ 5-9) in anticoagulated and 6 days (IIQ 5-10.5) in non-anticoagulated, p 0,000. In-hospital complications were 17 (14%) in anticoagulated and 81 (9%) in non-anticoagulated, p 0.064. The adjusted OR was 1.53 (95%CI 0.8-2.7) p 0.138. For 90-days readmission, the crude HR was 1.51 (95%CI 0.99-2.29) p 0.053 and the adjusted HR was 1.31 (95%CI 0.85-2.00) p0,09. For 90-days mortality, the crude HR was 0.80 (95%CI 0.45-1.43) p 0.464 and the adjusted HR was 0.70 (95% CI 0.39-1.25) p 0.239.

Discussion:

While we found differences between groups in time to surgery and hospital statistics these differences may not be clinically relevant. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Preoperative Management of Antithrombotics in Arthroplasty

Antithrombotic therapy is common in the arthroplasty patient population; the preoperative management of chronic antithrombotic medications requires coordination among the medical team. It is estimated that approximately 250,000 or 10% of patients on chronic antithrombotic medication undergo treatment interruption for surgical procedures annually in North America. Although the description of postoperative anticoagulation management after arthroplasty is extensive, orthopaedic literature describing the preoperative management of antithrombotic therapy is lacking. The goal of this guideline is to provide practicing orthopaedic surgeons concise recommendations for the preoperative management of common contemporary antithrombotics in the setting of elective arthroplasty using evidence-based guidelines from other medical specialties. All arthroplasty procedures are considered high bleeding risk in accordance with collaborative AAOS and ACC guidelines. Orthopaedic surgeons should collaborate with their colleagues in cardiology, anesthesia, and other specialties when planning perioperative antithrombotic interruption, particularly in the case of medically complex patients such as those with known risk factors for bleeding and clotting disorders. Resumption of antithrombotic therapy after arthroplasty is beyond the scope of this discussion; this should be performed in accordance with cardiology and anesthesia recommendations.

[Perioperative complications and mortality in elderly patients following surgery for femoral fracture: prospective observational study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Perioperative management of femoral fractures in elderly patients has been studied to determine modifiable causes of complications and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mortality rate and its causes in the elderly population with FF. We also evaluated perioperative complications and their association with postoperative mortality.

METHOD

In this prospective and observational study, we evaluated 182 patients, by questionnaire and electronic medical record, from the moment of hospitalization to one year after surgery. Statistical analyzes using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to detect independent mortality factors.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (30.8%) died within one year after surgery, and the main cause of death was infection followed by septic shock. The main complication, both preoperatively and postoperatively, was hydroelectrolytic disorder. For every one-unit (one-year) increase in age, the odds ratio for death increased by 4%. With each new preoperative complication, the odds ratio for death increased by 28%. Patients ASA III or IV had a 95% higher odds ratio for death than patiets ASA I or II.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing age and number of preoperative complications, in addition to ASA classification III or IV, were independent factors of increased risk of death in the population studied. The mortality rate was 30.8%, and infection followed by septic shock was the leading cause of death.

Prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after lower third molar extraction on warfarin therapy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan

Postoperative hemorrhage after tooth extraction is a critical and clinically important issue for clinicians and patients receiving anticoagulants. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after lower third molar extraction in Japanese patients receiving warfarin therapy. A total of 142 patients who underwent lower third molar extraction between January 2010 and December 2016 were included, and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. The prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage were investigated. The prevalence of postoperative hemorrhage after lower third molar extraction was significantly higher in patients receiving warfarin than in healthy subjects (21.8% vs 0.7%, P < 0.001). The cutoff value for PT-INR was 2.11 based on a receiver-operating characteristic analysis. A multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated PT-INR value [hazard ratio (HR) 3.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.400-10.467, P < 0.01], preoperative antibiotic administration (HR 4.434, 95% CI 1.591-14.775, P < 0.01), difficulties with intraoperative hemostasis (HR 16.298, 95% CI 2.986-110.677, P < 0.01), and higher serum creatinine levels (HR 7.465, 95% CI 1.616-39.576, P < 0.05) are significant predictors of postoperative hemorrhage after lower third molar extraction. Multivariate correlations were observed between risk factors including an elevated PT-INR value, preoperative antibiotic administration, and higher serum creatinine levels, and postoperative hemorrhage after lower third molar extraction in patients receiving warfarin therapy. Clinicians need to consider these risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after the lower third molar extraction and monitor PT-INR in patients receiving warfarin therapy.

Drivers of Variability in 90-Day Cost for Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

Value-based episode of care reimbursement models is being investigated to curb unsustainable health care costs. Any variation in the cost of index spine surgery can affect the payment bundling during the 90-d global period.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the drivers of variability in cost for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine disease.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-five patients undergoing elective ACDF for cervical spine degenerative diagnoses were included in the study. The direct 90-d cost was derived as sum of cost of surgery, cost associated with postdischarge utilization. Multiple variable linear regression models were built for total 90-d cost.

RESULTS

The mean 90-d direct cost was $17685 ± $5731. In a multiple variable linear regression model, the length of surgery, number of levels involved, length of hospital stay, preoperative history of anticoagulation medication, health-care resource utilization including number of imaging, any complications and readmission encounter were the significant contributor to the 90-d cost. The model performance as measured by R2 was 0.616.

CONCLUSION

There was considerable variation in total 90-d cost for elective ACDF surgery. Our model can explain about 62% of these variations in 90-d cost. The episode of care reimbursement models needs to take into account these variations and be inclusive of the factors that drive the variation in cost to develop a sustainable payment model. The generalized applicability should take in to account the differences in patient population, surgeons' and institution-specific differences.

Long-term rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer in a prospective multicenter trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE in active cancer patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01989845), we enrolled patients with active cancer and objectively diagnosed lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both from November 2013 to June 2016. Active cancer was defined as a histologically confirmed malignancy, which was diagnosed or treated within the previous 6 months, or as a recurrent/ metastatic cancer. Patients received oral rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for first 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for 6 months. The primary outcome was the symptomatic recurrent VTE and the secondary outcomes included any recurrent VTE, major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events, and overall mortality. All study outcomes were validated by blinded central adjudication.

RESULTS

Of 124 patients enrolled, 110 (88.7%) had solid cancer, 93 (75.0%) had metastatic disease, and 110 (88.7%) were receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. During the 6-month study period, seven patients experienced symptomatic recurrent VTE (cumulative incidence, 5.9%), and two patients experienced incidental recurrent PE (cumulative incidence of any recurrent VTE, 7.6%). Major bleeding events occurred in six patients (cumulative incidence, 5.3%) and CRNM bleeding events in 11 patients (cumulative incidence, 10.2%). Twenty-eight patients (overall mortality, 24.0%) died.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of VTE in patients with active cancer.

[Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in geriatric patients-use and limitations of existing guidelines]

The demographic developments of western society and the resulting increase in the number of very old patients in urology represents a challenge for the design of clinical studies and, consequently, recommendations of guidelines. While in internal medicine there is already a subspecialization with a focus on the treatment of elderly and multimorbid patients, in urology there is hardly any subspecialization into the problems of geriatric patients. Thus, using a case study as an example, the treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in geriatric patients are discussed. In addition the available evidence from the literature and guidelines are presented in order to assiste in daily management of geriatric patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and to critically discuss potential fields of application and limitations of the existing guidelines. In this context, we also examine the challenges when choosing a drug therapy and in deciding which of the many surgical options should be used.

The conundrum of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in burns in India and review of literature

Objective:

The aim is to assess the practice of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis among the plastic surgeons attending National Academy of Burns India Conference 2012 (NABICON 2012).

Background:

DVT prophylaxis in burns is a controversial issue as there is no consensus among the community of burn surgeons about the prevalence of DVT, the incidence of pulmonary embolism, the indications for DVT prophylaxis, dosage and duration of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and the complications related to DVT and LMWH.

Methodology:

A survey was conducted among plastic surgeons attending the NABICON 2012 held at New Delhi, by circulating a questionnaire. The respondents were divided into two groups based on whether burns constituted more than or less than 50% of their practice. The data thus collected were tabulated and analysed.

Results:

Almost 70% of all the respondents practice some form of DVT prophylaxis. There was significantly higher incidence of complications related to the use of LMWH among the surgeons whose practice of burns was >50%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in relation to the incidence and complication of DVT or recommendation of DVT prophylaxis.

Conclusion:

Majority of plastic surgeons practice DVT prophylaxis routinely and consider multiple criteria such as percentage of burns, age, lower limb involvement, the degree of burns and associated co-morbidities for starting the LMWH.

Right Ventricular Thrombus in Transit: Raising the Stakes in the Management of Pulmonary Embolism

•

Right heart thrombi are rare and associated with significant mortality.

•

RV thrombus was complicated by recurrent pulmonary emboli and managed surgically.

•

Recurrent pulmonary emboli in anticoagulated patients may suggest malignancy.

•

The optimal treatment for right heart thrombi remains uncertain.

•

Surgical thrombectomy is an option, but treatment should be individualized.

Interruption of long-term warfarin is not necessary in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Introduction

The management of anticoagulation in patients undergoing arthroplasty remains a challenge. Guidelines for perioperative management of long-term warfarin recommend discontinuation of warfarin preoperatively in low risk patients. We hypothesised that patients who had their warfarin continued during the perioperative period would have shorter hospital stay and no significant increase risk of surgical complications compared to patients who had their warfarin interrupted.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients receiving long-term warfarin who underwent total hip replacement without stopping warfarin. As a control group, we collected same data from 20 age and gender matched patients also on long term warfarin but their warfarin was stopped prior to surgery and restarted postoperatively.

Results

There was no significant difference in age, BMI or comorbidities between the 2 groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in postoperative INR (P < 0.0001) levels. The mean drop in Hb postoperatively was 25.95 g/L in the warfarin group and 35.7 g/L in the control group, which was statistically significant (P = 0.0066). Hospital stay was statistically significant with shorted stay observed in the warfarin group (P = 0.0447). The odds ratio for developing a postoperative complication was 1.5882 which was not statistically significant (P = 0.6346).

Conclusion

Our results support the hypothesis that it is safe to continue warfarin in patients on long term anticoagulation undergoing total hip replacement. Continuation of warfarin was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay and less INR fluctuations. There was no significant increase in the risk of complications or blood transfusion.