A comparison of clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia

Efficacy and safety of evenamide, a glutamate modulator, added to a second-generation antipsychotic in inadequately/poorly responding patients with chronic schizophrenia: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3, international clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Evenamide, a glutamate modulator, is currently in phase 3 of development as add-on treatment to antipsychotics in patients with inadequate response or treatment-resistant schizophrenia. This study was designed to determine if patients with chronic schizophrenia inadequately responding to a second-generation antipsychotic would benefit from add-on treatment with evenamide at a dose of 30 mg bid.

METHODS

Study 008A was a prospective, 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oral doses of evenamide of 30 mg bid in patients with chronic schizophrenia treated at stable therapeutic doses of a second-generation antipsychotic. Outpatients aged ≥18 years, both males and females, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (DSM-V), who had been receiving antipsychotics for at least 2 years at stable doses, but still symptomatic (PANSS 70-85, CGI-S 4-6, predominant positive symptoms), were eligible for the study. Patients were randomised equally to evenamide 30 mg or placebo, given bid, after completing a 21-day screening period. The primary outcome (change from baseline in PANSS total score) was assessed weekly, with the primary endpoint at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients were enrolled, of which 11 (3·8%) discontinued prematurely, overall. Add-on treatment with evenamide was associated to a statistically significant (the absolute difference of the two treatment groups for the PANSS Total at Day 29, primary efficacy endpoint, was = 2·5 [p-value<0.05] that is associated with a Cohen's d effect size = 0·33) and clinically meaningful benefit compared to placebo across all efficacy measures, and was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The demonstration of statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit of evenamide, a glutamate modulator, as add-on treatment in patients with chronic schizophrenia inadequately responding to their second-generation antipsychotic may represent a new treatment paradigm for this population.

Clozapine as a Long-Term Therapeutic Choice: Longitudinal Analysis of Schizophrenia Symptoms in a Naturalistic Setting

Background and Hypothesis

Clozapine remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), yet the time course of clinical response in naturalistic settings is not well characterized. We hypothesized that patients initiated on clozapine in an outpatient clinic would demonstrate measurable symptom reduction over time, including delayed response in a subset of patients.

Study Design

We conducted a retrospective study of TRS patients (N = 26) newly initiated on clozapine at an outpatient clozapine clinic. Symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline and follow-up visits. Linear spline regression modeled PANSS trajectories over time. Response was defined as achieving either a ≥ 20% reduction in PANSS total score or a mild level of illness (PANSS score ≤ 58).

Study Results

Patients demonstrated a mean 18.1-point reduction in PANSS total score during the first year of clozapine treatment, with significant improvements in positive and general psychopathology symptoms. Negative symptoms showed a modest, nonsignificant change. Overall, 20 patients (76.9%) achieved a ≥ 20% PANSS reduction, and 15 (57.7%) reached a mild symptom level. Six patients (23.1%) met response criteria only after 12 months of treatment.

Conclusions

In this naturalistic study, clozapine was associated with substantial symptom improvement, particularly within the first year. A subset of patients demonstrated delayed but clinically meaningful response, supporting the continued use of clozapine beyond 12 months. These findings underscore the value of sustained treatment in TRS.

Therapeutic Effect of Evenamide, a Glutamate Inhibitor, in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS): Final, 1-Year Results From a Phase 2, Open-Label, Rater-Blinded, Randomized, International Clinical Trial

The results from a pilot, 1-year, randomized, open-label, add-on treatment study in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) with evenamide, a glutamate modulator, were not associated with any safety abnormalities at all doses (7.5-30 mg bid), with a high retention rate even at 6-month (~85%), and 1-year (~75%), and the absence of psychotic relapses during the 1-year treatment period. Overall, treatment with evenamide showed a gradual, sustained, and clinically important improvement up to 1 year in all efficacy measures (eg, PANSS mean change ~ -20%; CGI-S mean change ~ -1.0). In addition, compared to the results at Week 6, the responder rates generally more than doubled at 1-year (PANSS "≥20% improvement from baseline" = ~45%; CGI-S "2-category of improvement" = ~25%; CGI-C "much improved" = ~40%). These results, rarely replicated in other trials in TRS, support the use of evenamide as an add-on treatment in patients who are not benefiting from their current first- or second-generation antipsychotic medication.

The effect of clozapine on immune-related biomarkers in schizophrenia patients

Globally, schizophrenia is one of the main causes of disability. Approximately 1 % of the general population suffers from schizophrenia, and 30 % of cases are unresponsive to therapy. Clozapine is the gold standard for therapy-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), yet it has limited effectiveness and serious adverse events in some patients. Because of the possibility of severe neutropenia, clozapine administration requires monthly hematological monitoring in the first four months. Previous investigations have demonstrated the immune system alteration after clozapine treatment in schizophrenia patients. Besides, it has been proposed that clozapine changes the cytokines profile in schizophrenia patients. These findings highlighted the need to learn more about the disease's etiology and investigate the relationship between peripheral immune system markers and clozapine response to support strategies for better treatment outcomes. The time decision-making to start clozapine could be significantly decreased if some biomarkers were developed to assist physicians in anticipating whether a particular patient will respond to the medication. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively review the effect of clozapine on immune-related biomarkers in schizophrenia patients.

Polypharmacy to Clozapine Monotherapy in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

This case report discusses a 25-year-old Middle Eastern female with a 14-year history of schizophrenia, managed as an inpatient for nearly eight years. Initially referred to a psychiatrist at age 12, with one-year-long concerns about preoccupation with the idea of having a serious illness, depressed mood, decreased appetite, social withdrawal, and aggression, she underwent multiple admissions, various medication combinations, and electroconvulsive therapy but remained resistant to treatment until clozapine monotherapy was initiated in 2023. After starting clozapine, improvements were noted in speech, communication, and eye contact, though negative symptoms and bouts of aggression persisted. This case highlights the efficacy of clozapine monotherapy in managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia after years of ineffective polypharmacy treatment. The importance of clozapine in treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia cannot be understated. Despite its efficacy, clozapine is often underutilised globally due to concerns about adverse effects and the need for blood monitoring, leading to the overuse of antipsychotic polypharmacy. This polypharmacy is associated with higher adverse event rates, increased costs, and uncertain long-term safety. This case report demonstrates the successful management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia with clozapine monotherapy. The patient's significant improvement supports the need to prioritise clozapine, highlighting its benefits over polypharmacy and advocating for its broader use to enhance patient outcomes.

A network meta-analysis of efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is considered as the standard treatment for this subgroup, but the evidence is not unequivocal. There are several potential alternatives being used because of the possible adverse effects of clozapine. We aimed to examine the efficacy and adverse events of different antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia by performing a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group register for randomized-controlled trials (up to March 06, 2022) and MEDLINE (up to January 20, 2023). We included blinded and open studies and participants with a broad definition of treatment resistance. The primary outcome was overall symptoms of schizophrenia; secondary outcomes were response to treatment, positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, discontinuation, side effects, quality of life, and functioning. The study was registered in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/9nf2y/ ).

RESULTS

We included 60 studies involving 6838 participants in the network meta-analysis. In the primary outcome, clozapine and olanzapine were more efficacious than risperidone, haloperidol, fluphenazine, sertindole, chlorpromazine, and quetiapine (range of mean SMDs, - 0.11 to - 0.48). The difference between clozapine and olanzapine was trivial and uncertain (SMD - 0.05, 95% CI, - 0.21 to 0.11). The result of other efficacy outcomes as well as subgroup and sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. Clozapine and olanzapine were associated with more weight gain, and clozapine was associated with more sedation events compared to many other antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine remains the gold standard for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Olanzapine seems to be second-best and could be tried before switching to clozapine.

Efficacy of pharmacological agents for the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare and generate evidence for the most efficacious treatment among available pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS).

METHODS

Reviewers extracted data from 47 studies screened from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane databases and clinical trial registries fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Random effects Bayesian NMA was done with non-informative priors. Network geometry was visualized, and node splitting was done for the closed triangles. Standardized mean difference and 95% credible interval(95%CrI) were reported for the reduction in symptom severity scores. The probability of each intervention for each rank was plotted. Meta-regression was done for the duration of the therapy.

RESULTS

Augmentation of antipsychotics with escitalopram (SMD: -1.7[95%CrI: -2.8, -0.70]), glycine (SMD: -1.2 [95%CrI: -2.2, -0.28]) and Yokukansan (SMD: -1.3 [95%CrI: -2.4, -0.24]) shows a statistically significant reduction in symptom severity when compared to clozapine. As per surface under cumulative ranking curve analysis, escitalopram in combination with antipsychotics appeared to be the best intervention with moderate certainty of evidence. There was no significant effect of the duration of therapy on the treatment effects.

CONCLUSION

Escitalopram augmentation of antipsychotics appears to be the most efficacious treatment with moderate certainty of evidence among the available pharmacological interventions.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42022380292.

Clozapine-Associated Agranulocytosis: A Systematic Review. Is It Really So Frighteningly Common?

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is a very effective therapeutic option for schizophrenic disorders that have been refractory to most other therapies. This extremely positive aspect clashes easily with an adverse effect of the drug that is deemed to be a very dangerous one: agranulocytosis. We asked whether the mandatory strict hematological follow-up prescribed in the black box warning of clozapine's label is proportioned to the actual incidence of agranulocytosis, considering that is the main reason that such a drug is often used only late in the treatment course.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of reports examining clozapine administration and agranulocytosis incidence. We specifically selected those where mild and moderate neutropenia was not used as a trigger to stop administration of clozapine, to better estimate the sheer incidence of agranulocytosis when clozapine was continued even with mild hematological effect, where detected. We used PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases to identify clinical studies conducted between January 1975 and April 2023.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies, mostly retrospective ones, that examined the incidence of hematological adverse effects in patients using clozapine. A total of 2354 subjects were included. The mean age of the subjects was 33.5 years. The mean duration of observation of subjects who took clozapine was 800 days, with a mean daily dose of 319.5 mg per day. Of the 2354 subjects examined, we found that 11 of them experienced agranulocytosis (0.47%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the evidence of a lower incidence of agranulocytosis than previously estimated and are in line with more recent meta-analyses. We may therefore think that clinical practice may demand a revision of the approach that both psychiatrists and supervising organizations often take when talking about clozapine.

Genomic and Reverse Translational Analysis Discloses a Role for Small GTPase RhoA Signaling in the Pathogenesis of Schizophrenia: Rho-Kinase as a Novel Drug Target

Schizophrenia is one of the most serious psychiatric disorders and is characterized by reductions in both brain volume and spine density in the frontal cortex. RhoA belongs to the RAS homolog (Rho) family and plays critical roles in neuronal development and structural plasticity via Rho-kinase. RhoA activity is regulated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). Several variants in GAPs and GEFs associated with RhoA have been reported to be significantly associated with schizophrenia. Moreover, several mouse models carrying schizophrenia-associated gene variants involved in RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling have been developed. In this review, we summarize clinical evidence showing that variants in genes regulating RhoA activity are associated with schizophrenia. In the last half of the review, we discuss preclinical evidence indicating that RhoA/Rho-kinase is a potential therapeutic target of schizophrenia. In particular, Rho-kinase inhibitors exhibit anti-psychotic-like effects not only in Arhgap10 S490P/NHEJ mice, but also in pharmacologic models of schizophrenia (methamphetamine- and MK-801-treated mice). Accordingly, we propose that Rho-kinase inhibitors may have antipsychotic effects and reduce cognitive deficits in schizophrenia despite the presence or absence of genetic variants in small GTPase signaling pathways.

Phase 2 Results Indicate Evenamide, A Selective Modulator of Glutamate Release, Is Associated With Clinically Important Long-Term Efficacy When Added to an Antipsychotic in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

Results from a pilot, 6-week, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded study, with 46-week extension, indicate very good tolerability with exceptional, clinically important, increasing efficacy of evenamide (7.5, 15, and 30 mg bid), a glutamate modulator, as add-on treatment to antipsychotics in 161 treatment-resistant, schizophrenia patients. Ninety-five percent of patients completed 6 weeks (1 discontinued for adverse event), and 89% continued in the extension. Results from the first 100 patients enrolled showed very low attrition over 1 year (77 completers); data pooled from all dose groups showed the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score improved significantly (P < .001; paired t test; last observation carried forward [LOCF]) from baseline at 6 weeks (-9.4), 6 months (-12.7), and 1 year (-14.7); similarly, the proportion of responders (≥20% improvement) increased over time from 6 weeks (16.5%) to 6 months (39%) to 1 year (47.4%). Noteworthy improvement was also observed at each timepoint on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale and Clinical Global Impression of Change, indicating progressively increasing efficacy of evenamide up to 1 year.

Associations of Clozapine Use With Psychosocial Functioning and Quality of Life in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

More attempts have been made recently to improve psychosocial functioning and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia, due to their crucial role in long-term outcomes. Previous studies on the effects of clozapine on psychosocial functioning have been limited in terms of generalizability and application to clinical practice. This study examined the relationship of clozapine use with psychosocial functioning and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a survey targeting community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia. The Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS) and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were administered to evaluate psychosocial functioning and quality of life, and patients were classified into Clozapine and Non-clozapine groups. Group differences were assessed using ANCOVA, with additional sensitivity analyses for participants on atypical antipsychotic medications only.

RESULTS

Of 292 patients, the Clozapine group (n=34) had significantly better psychosocial functioning and quality of life than the Nonclozapine group (n=258), as demonstrated by their low BASIS score (F=4.651, df=1, 290, p=0.032) and high SWLS score (F=14.637, df=1, 290, p<0.001). Similar findings for psychosocial outcomes were observed in the analyses of the atypical antipsychotic subgroup (n=195).

CONCLUSION

For optimal recovery in schizophrenia, restoration of impaired social functioning and enhanced satisfaction with life are essential. In this study, clozapine use was related to high levels of psychosocial functioning and quality of life in real-world settings. Further research on the causal relationship between clozapine use and psychosocial functioning is needed.

Predictors of response to pharmacological treatments in treatment-resistant schizophrenia - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As the burden of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) on patients and society is high it is important to identify predictors of response to medications in TRS. The aim was to analyse whether baseline patient and study characteristics predict treatment response in TRS in drug trials.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy completed in PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science helped identify relevant studies. The studies had to meet the following criteria: English language clinical trial of pharmacological treatment of TRS, clear definition of TRS and response, percentage of response reported, at least one baseline characteristic presented, and total sample size of at least 15. Meta-regression techniques served to explore whether baseline characteristics predict response to medication in TRS.

RESULTS

77 articles were included in the systematic review. The overall sample included 7546 patients, of which 41% achieved response. Higher positive symptom score at baseline predicted higher response percentage. None of the other baseline patient or study characteristics achieved statistical significance at predicting response. When analysed in groups divided by antipsychotic drugs, studies of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics produced the highest response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analytic review identified surprisingly few baseline characteristics that predicted treatment response. However, higher positive symptoms and the use of atypical antipsychotics - particularly clozapine -was associated with the greatest likelihood of response. The difficulty involved in the prediction of medication response in TRS necessitates careful monitoring and personalised medication management. There is a need for more investigations of the predictors of treatment response in TRS.

The Use of Clozapine in the Serious Mental Illness Patients Enrolled in an Assertive Community Treatment Program

Introduction Health care cost is projected to reach 20% of the nation's gross national product (GNP) by 2016. 6.2% of this is from mental health. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) estimates the prevalence of serious mental illness (SMI) at 13.1 million or 5.2% of American adults age 18 or over. Hence, mental health care cost for this patient population is significant. Patients with SMI involved in an Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) program are individuals who experience the most intractable symptoms and the greatest level of dysfunction from their mental illness. These individuals typically are institutionalized in a long-term facility such as the state hospital. Clozapine has shown superior efficacy over first- and most second-generation antipsychotics in both treating treatment-resistant and non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia which has been supported by several large trials. There is also evidence of its efficacy in suicidality, aggression and substance misuse. In fact, clozapine has been approved by the FDA for use in refractory schizophrenia and suicidality in schizoaffective disorder. Due to the risk of agranulocytosis, clozapine is underutilized. The purpose of this study is to conduct a retrospective cohort study through chart review to analyze whether the addition of clozapine to ACT treatment of SMI patients in a community hospital from 2008 to 2018 led to decreased frequency of hospitalizations and increased clinical stability. Materials and methods A retrospective study using electronic medical record (EMR) of patients ages 20 and above who were enrolled in the ACT program at a community hospital from December 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. Variables were collected from the EMR and de-identified during data collation. Analysis was performed using SPSS software package. Results A total of 179 patients enrolled in the ACT program and their data was extracted from the EMR. Twenty-five (62.5%) of these patient enrollments were on clozapine. They were made up of 53.6% male, 81.9% White/Asian, 18.1% Black; 44.1% ages between 36 to 50 years old, 30.2% were aged 18 to 35 years old, and 25.7% greater than 50 years old. There was no difference in age, sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance type in ACT program between those using clozapine and those not on clozapine. There was a higher proportion of psychiatric hospitalizations among clozapine users compared with the non-clozapine user group (62.5% vs 41.5%, p = 0.019). However, the two groups did not differ from one another in terms of psychiatric emergency visits (p = 0.128) or frequency of ACT visits (p = 0.002). Conclusion Effective treatment that will reduce hospitalizations and the burden of chronic disability in patients with SMI would greatly reduce mental health care cost. Clozapine remains the gold standard in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. But due to the risk of agranulocytosis, clozapine is underutilized. It was hoped that this study will support the use of clozapine in SMI patients. Disappointingly, the use of clozapine did not prevent relapses and hospitalizations in this patient population and patients on clozapine seemed to have increased hospitalizations, compared to those who were not on clozapine. Perhaps, a different outcome would have occurred if the focus was limited to the patients themselves who were on Clozapine and ascertain what the rate of hospitalization was before the start of clozapine vs after the use of clozapine.

A Machine Learning Approach Using Effective Connectivity to Predict Response to Clozapine Treatment

Clozapine is an anti-psychotic drug that is known to be effective in the treatment of patients with chronic treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS-SCZ), commonly estimated to be around one third of all cases. However, clinicians sometimes delay the initiation of this drug because of its adverse side-effects. Therefore, identification of predictive biological markers of clozapine response are extremely valuable to aid on-time initiation of treatment. In this study, we develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm based on pre-treatment electroencephalogram (EEG) data sets to predict response to clozapine treatment in 57 TRS-SCZs, where the treatment outcome, after at least one-year follow-up is determined using the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS). The ML algorithm has three steps: 1) a brain source localization (BSL) procedure using the linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamforming approach is employed on the EEG signals to extract source waveforms from 30 specified brain regions. 2) An effective connectivity measure named symbolic transfer entropy (STE) is applied to the source waveforms. 3) A ML algorithm is applied to the STE matrix to determine whether a set of features can be found to discriminate most-responder (MR) SCZ patients from least-responder (LR) ones. The findings of this study reveal that STE features can achieve an accuracy of 95.83%. This finding implies that analysis of pre-treatment EEG could contribute to our ability to distinguish MR from LR SCZs, and that the source STE matrix may prove to be a promising tool for the prediction of the clinical response to clozapine.

Quantitative biomarkers to predict response to clozapine treatment using resting EEG data

Clozapine is an anti-psychotic drug that is known to be effective in the treatment of patients with chronic treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS-SCZ), commonly estimated to be around one third of all cases. However, clinicians sometimes delay the initiation of this drug because of its adverse side-effects. Therefore, identification of predictive biomarkers of clozapine response is extremely valuable to aid on-time initiation of clozapine treatment. In this study, we develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm based on the pre-treatment electroencephalogram (EEG) data sets to predict response to clozapine treatment in TRS-SCZs, where the treatment outcome, after at least one-year follow-up is determined using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The ML algorithm has two steps: 1) an effective connectivity named symbolic transfer entropy (STE) is applied to resting state EEG waveforms, 2) the ML algorithm is applied to STE matrix to determine whether a set of features can be found to discriminate most responder (MR) SCZ patients from least responder (LR) ones. The findings of this study revealed that the STE features could achieve an accuracy of 89.90%. This finding implies that analysis of pre-treatment EEG could contribute to our ability to distinguish MR from LR SCZs, and that the STE matrix may prove to be a promising tool for the prediction of the clinical response to clozapine.

Effect of age on the relative efficacy of clozapine in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Early treatment of schizophrenia improves outcomes. Clozapine appears to have unique benefit when other antipsychotic medication has failed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess clozapine's superiority over alternative antipsychotic medication and examine whether earlier use is associated with additional benefit.

METHOD

Systematic retrieval of blinded, randomized controlled trials comparing clozapine with alternative antipsychotics in adults with schizophrenia. The effect of mean age on relative clozapine response was examined using random effects meta-regression, and multiple linear regression on available patient data.

RESULTS

A total of 276 studies were retrieved. Thirty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis. Clozapine was significantly more effective than alternative antipsychotics in reducing psychotic symptoms and increasing response. However, meta-regression failed to show a more significant effect in younger patients (age on effect size (total psychotic symptoms) 0.00, P = 0.79 CI -0.03 to 0.03). Individual patient data were available for two studies, the larger of which showed a significant interaction between younger age and superiority of clozapine.

CONCLUSION

The results support clozapine's superiority over other antipsychotics. A convincing effect of age on this effect was not demonstrated, although this was suggested in one study. In view of the age of many of the included studies, and changes in reporting practice over time, new clozapine RCTs, which include age of illness onset as well as age at trial time, would be welcome in order to provide meta-analysable data for future use.

Meta-analysis of drop-out rates in randomised clinical trials, comparing typical and atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia

Objective

To assess antipsychotic medication in the treatment of schizophrenia, based on trial drop-out rates.

Methods

The studies included were randomised controlled trials that compared any of the four clinically best-established atypical antipsychotics (quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone or clozapine) against either of two typical antipsychotics regarded as the gold standard (haloperidol or chlorpromazine).

Results

Meta-analysis indicated less risk of all-cause patient withdrawal from atypical medication trials where dosage was flexible, in both the short, relative risk (RR) 0.70 (95% CI 0.64–0.76), P < 0.00001, and long term, RR 0.72 (0.65–0.80), P < 0.00001. Similar results were observed for withdrawal due to adverse events, RR: 0.54 (0.41–0.72), P < 0.0001. Nevertheless, the favourable effects of atypical medication disappeared in trials relying on fixed dosage.

Conclusions

We detected a significant positive effect in terms of the outcome of treatment discontinuation for atypical versus typical medication, though only where the use of flexible rather than fixed doses (closer to an experimental control situation) was possible.

Clozapine associated cardiotoxicity: Issues, challenges and way forward

OBJECTIVE

To review the published literature on clozapine associated cardiotoxicity (CACT), summarize diagnostic features, and evaluate monitoring procedures for safe clozapine re-challenge.

RESULTS

Clozapine-associated Myocarditis (CAM) - Incidence of early myocarditis (≤2 months) is infrequent but serious. Clinical diagnosis is confounded by variability in presentation and non-specificity of symptoms. Re-challenge considerations include clozapine impact on symptomatic severity and associated disability and risk of suicidality. Re-challenging is recommended only after full clinical resolution of myocarditis and cardiac function impairment, under closely controlled conditions, starting at very low dosage, extremely slow titration and frequent assays of lab and cardio biomarkers. Clozapine associated cardiomyopathy (CAC) -develops later but mortality has been reported at 12.5-24.0%. Re-challenge is generally not recommended due to paucity of outcome data. Monitoring Cardiac Toxicity: Plausible steps include closer clinical monitoring, repeated assays of biomarkers, and echocardiographic studies, and cardiac MRI changes with unremarkable findings of cardiac dysfunction with echocardiography. Subclinical clozapine associated cardiotoxicity is more prevalent than CAM and CAC. Diagnosis is often challenging due to non specific presentation. Active monitoring is recommended. Rechallenging is feasible but should be done under close monitoring conditions. A protocol is proposed based on literature review and clinical experience in order to reduce the risk of CACT.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine-associated myocarditis and cardiomyopathy may have been underreported worldwide. Identification of subclinical cardiotoxic effects can improve outcomes by earlier recognition before clinical manifestations of cardiac impairments. A pragmatic close clinical monitoring protocol including cardiac biomarkers aimed at timely detection of cardiac toxicity, in the initial phase of treatment is proposed.

Heterogeneity and efficacy of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia with or without treatment resistance: a meta-analysis

Two important clinical questions are whether there is a subtype of schizophrenia which responds differently to clozapine relative to other antipsychotics, and whether greater efficacy of clozapine is dependent on the degree of treatment-resistance. The authors address this by examining both variability and magnitude of response in patients treated with clozapine and other antipsychotics for both treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and non-resistant schizophrenia. Double-blind randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with other antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia were identified using five databases. Standard deviations and means of change in total, positive, and negative symptoms were extracted. Variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR) were used to quantify relative variability in symptom change. Hedges' g was used to quantify mean differences. Ten TRS studies (n = 822) and 29 non-TRS studies (n = 2566) were meta-analysed. Relative variability in change of total symptoms did not differ significantly between clozapine and other antipsychotics in TRS studies (VR = 1.84; 95%CI, 0.85-4.02). These findings were similar with CVR, and for positive and negative symptoms. Clozapine was superior to other antipsychotics in improving total symptoms in both TRS (g = 0.34; 95%CI, 0.13-0.56) and non-TRS (g = 0.20; 95%CI, 0.08-0.32) studies. Furthermore, clozapine was superior in improving positive symptoms in both study groups, but not for negative symptoms. Pooled effect sizes showed no significant difference between TRS and non-TRS studies. These findings do not support a subtype of schizophrenia which responds specifically to clozapine. Clozapine is more effective than other antipsychotics irrespective of treatment-resistance, arguing for its use more generally in schizophrenia. PROSPERO CRD42018086507.

Clozapine augmentation strategies

Clozapine is established as the gold standard for antipsychotic treatment of patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Over virtually 3 decades, the level of inadequate response to clozapine was found to range from 40% to 60%. A heightened interest developed in the augmentation of clozapine to try to achieve response or maximize partial response. A large variety of drug groups have been investigated. This article focuses on the meta-analyses of these trials to discover reasonable evidence-based approaches to the management of patients not responding to clozapine.

Clozapine and tardive dyskinesia in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is commonly recommended that a switch to clozapine be implemented in the face of tardive dyskinesia, even if current treatment involves another "atypical" agent. However, reports do indicate clozapine carries a liability for tardive dyskinesia.

AIMS

This review sought to evaluate clozapine in relation to tardive dyskinesia in the context of available evidence.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies published in English, using the keywords: clozapine AND tardive dyskinesia OR TD. References from major review articles were searched for additional relevant publications. Studies were included if they investigated: tardive dyskinesia in clozapine-treated patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and reported on two or more assessments of tardive dyskinesia severity measured by the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; or clozapine's tardive dyskinesia liability.

RESULTS

In total, 513 unique citations were identified and 29 reports met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies suggest clozapine reduces dyskinetic symptoms over time (n=905 clozapine-treated participants); however, the minimum required dose and effect of withdrawal requires further investigation. The majority of reports which address clozapine's liability for tardive dyskinesia are case studies (11 of 14 reports, 79%), and clozapine was only the first-line treatment in one of the remaining three studies reporting treatment-emergent dyskinetic symptoms with clozapine in 12% of patients. No significant between-drug differences were identified comparing clozapine's risk to other atypical antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Research to date supports switching to clozapine for the purpose of reducing tardive dyskinesia risk and/or treating existing tardive dyskinesia, but prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary if we are to substantiate existing recommendations.

Cardiovascular effects of psychotic illnesses and antipsychotic therapy

Mortality from cardiovascular disease is increased in people with mental health disorders in general and schizophrenia in particular. The causes are multifactorial, but it is known that antipsychotic medication can cause cardiac side-effects beyond the traditional coronary risk factors. Schizophrenia itself is a contributor to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality via cardiac autonomic dysfunction and a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome, both contributing to a reduced life expectancy. The pro-arrhythmic impact of traditional antipsychotics, especially via the hERG-potassium channel, has been known for several years. Newer antipsychotics have a reduced pro-arrhythmic profile but might contribute to higher cardiac death rates by worsening the metabolic profile. Clozapine-induced cardiomyopathy, which is dose independent, is a further concern and continuous monitoring of these patients is required. Prophylaxis with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is currently under review. Overall, management of cardiovascular risk within this population group must be multifaceted and nuanced to allow the most effective treatment of serious mental illness to be conducted within acceptable parameters of cardiovascular risk; some practical measures are presented for the clinical cardiologist.

Treatment Recommendations for Tardive Dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia is a movement disorder characterised by irregular, stereotyped, and choreiform movements associated with the use of antipsychotic medication. We aim to provide recommendations on the treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies of the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. Studies were rated for methodological quality using the American Academy of Neurology Risk of Bias Classification system. Overall level of evidence classifications and grades of recommendation were made using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network framework.

RESULTS

Preventing tardive dyskinesia is of primary importance, and clinicians should follow best practice for prescribing antipsychotic medication, including limiting the prescription for specific indications, using the minimum effective dose, and minimising the duration of therapy. The first-line management of tardive dyskinesia is the withdrawal of antipsychotic medication if clinically feasible. Yet, for many patients with serious mental illness, the discontinuation of antipsychotics is not possible due to disease relapse. Switching from a first-generation to a second-generation antipsychotic with a lower D2 affinity, such as clozapine or quetiapine, may be effective in reducing tardive dyskinesia symptoms. The strongest evidence for a suitable co-intervention to treat tardive dyskinesia comes from tests with the new VMAT inhibitors, deutetrabenazine and valbenazine. These medications have not been approved for use in Canada.

CONCLUSION

Data on tardive dyskinesia treatment are limited, and the best management strategy remains prevention. More long-term safety and efficacy data are needed for deutetrabenazine and valbenazine, and their routine availability to patients outside of the USA remains in question.

[Electroconvulsive therapy in treatment of resistant schizophrenia: biological markers of efficacy and safety]

AIM

To evaluate clinical and biological efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with treatment-resistant paranoid schizophrenia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Determination of CNS specific biological markers (BDNF, NSE, S100B), together with markers of inflammation and CNS alteration (IL-2, CPK, CPK-MB), and clinical evaluation were performed in two groups of patients: the ECT + antipsychotic treatment group (n=66) and the antipsychotic treatment group (n=32).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In the ECT + antipsychotic treatment group, the more pronounced reduction of psychotic symptoms has been revealed compared with subjects on antipsychotic treatment as monotherapy. Patients receiving ECT showed no increase in plasma levels of inflammation and CNS alteration biomarkers (NSE, S100B, CPK, CPK-MB, IL-2). The plasma level of BDNF, capable to characterize both the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic therapy, had a more pronounced upward trend in subjects with combined electroconvulsive and antipsychotic treatment, which may indicate good tolerability and high effectiveness of ECT.

A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing the association between clozapine and other antipsychotic medications and the development of neutropenia

BACKGROUND

In most countries, clozapine can only be prescribed with regular monitoring of white blood cell counts because of concerns that clozapine has a stronger association with neutropenia than other antipsychotics. However, this has not been previously demonstrated conclusively with meta-analysis of controlled studies.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to assess the strength of the association between clozapine and neutropenia when compared to other antipsychotic medications by a meta-analysis of controlled studies. An electronic search of Medline (1948-2018), PsycINFO (1967-2018) and Embase (1947-2018) using search terms (clozapine OR clopine OR clozaril OR zaponex) AND (neutropenia OR agranulocytosis) was undertaken. Random-effects meta-analysis using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio was used to assess the strength of the effect size.

RESULTS

We located 20 studies that reported rates of neutropenia associated with clozapine and other antipsychotic medications. The risk ratio was not significantly increased in clozapine-exposed groups compared to exposure to other antipsychotic medications (Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio = 1.45, 95% confidence interval = [0.87, 2.42]). This also applied to severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500 per µL) when compared to other antipsychotics (Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval = [0.58, 4.71]). The relative risk of neutropenia associated with clozapine exposure was not significantly associated with any individual antipsychotic medication.

CONCLUSION

Data from controlled trials do not support the belief that clozapine has a stronger association with neutropenia than other antipsychotic medications. This implies that either all antipsychotic drugs should be subjected to haematological monitoring or monitoring isolated to clozapine is not justified.

Evaluation of a few discrete clinical markers may predict categorization of actively symptomatic non-acute schizophrenia patients as treatment resistant or responders: A study by ROC curve analysis and multivariate analyses

Here, we used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine whether clinical factors may aid predicting the categorization of schizophrenia patients as Treatment Resistant (TRS) or antipsychotic responsive schizophrenia (ARS). Patients with an established condition of TRS or ARS were assessed for: clinical presentation and course; neurological soft signs (NES); psychopathology by PANSS; cognitive performances; quality of life scale (QLS); functional capacity; social functioning (PSP and SLOF scales). In ROC curve analysis, significance indicated that the Area under curve (AUC) allowed distinguishing between TRS and ARS. Multivariate analyses were additionally used to provide independent predictive analysis. Multiple clinical variables showed significant AUCs. The largest significant AUCs were found for: NES total score; SLOF Area2; QLS subscale; antipsychotic doses. The highest sensitivity was found for NES total score, the highest specificity for previous hospitalizations. The highest Odds Ratio of being included within the TRS category were found for: NES total score (7.5); QLS total score (5.49); and previous hospitalizations (4.76). This same circumscribed group of variables was also found to be predictive of TRS when adopting stepwise logistic regression or discriminant analysis. We concluded that the evaluation of few clinical factors may provide reliable and accurate predictions on whether one schizophrenia patient may be categorized as a TRS.

Clozapine and Psychosocial Function in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has unique efficacy for symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia; however, symptomatic remission is not necessary nor sufficient for functional improvement. No study has pooled the effect of clozapine on psychosocial function across clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of clozapine with other antipsychotics on psychosocial function, and described the predictors of functional outcome.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials and clinical trial registries till April 2018, with no language limits. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of clozapine vs. typical or atypical antipsychotics among adults with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We included studies with flexible or fixed doses of antipsychotics within the therapeutic range to reflect naturalistic care. Effect sizes of studies were pooled using generic inverse variance and random-effects models and presented as standard mean differences. Study quality was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guideline, and subgroup analyses were carried out to identify potential moderators and methodological biases.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 1279 participants (69.7% male) were included. Clozapine showed beneficial effects on psychosocial function, but both short-term trials [n = 3; comparing 99 people taking clozapine with 97 controls (standardised mean difference = 0.04; 95% confidence interval - 0.24, 0.32; p = 0.77; I² = 0%)] and long-term trials [n = 5; comparing 415 people taking clozapine with 427 controls (standardised mean difference = 0.05; 95% confidence interval - 0.16, 0.27; p = 0.64; I² = 50%)] showed no superiority of clozapine to other antipsychotics in this regard. Only one study explored the predictors of psychosocial function. Baseline severity of illness, illicit drug use, extrapyramidal side effects, sex and cognition explained the variability in functional outcome. A range of scales measured psychosocial function, and the quality of reporting varied across trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine does not appear superior to other antipsychotics for improvement of psychosocial function. Standardisation of psychosocial function measurement is needed to improve the quality of evidence. Further exploration of the predictors of good psychosocial outcomes with clozapine treatment may improve personalisation of care.

Tardive dyskinesia risk with first- and second-generation antipsychotics in comparative randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) risk with D2/serotonin receptor antagonists or D2 receptor partial agonists (second-generation antipsychotics, SGAs) is considered significantly lower than with D2 antagonists (first-generation antipsychotics, FGAs). As some reports questioned this notion, we meta-analyzed randomized controlled studies (RCTs) to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and annualized rate ratio (RaR) of TD comparing SGAs vs. FGAs and SGAs vs. SGAs. Additionally, we calculated raw and annualized pooled TD rates for each antipsychotic. Data from 57 head-to-head RCTs, including 32 FGA and 86 SGA arms, were meta-analyzed, yielding 32 FGA-SGA pairs and 35 SGA-SGA pairs. The annualized TD incidence across FGA arms was 6.5% (95% CI: 5.3-7.8%) vs. 2.6% (95% CI: 2.0-3.1%) across SGA arms. TD risk and annualized rates were lower with SGAs vs. FGAs (RR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.57, p<0.0001, k=28; RaR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.28-0.45, p<0.0001, number-needed-to-treat, NNT=20). Meta-regression showed no FGA dose effect on FGA-SGA comparisons (Z=-1.03, p=0.30). FGA-SGA TD RaRs differed by SGA comparator (Q=21.8, df=7, p=0.003), with a significant advantage of olanzapine and aripiprazole over other non-clozapine SGAs in exploratory pairwise comparisons. SGA-SGA comparisons confirmed the olanzapine advantage vs. non-clozapine SGAs (RaR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88, p=0.006, k=17, NNT=100). This meta-analysis confirms a clinically meaningfully lower TD risk with SGAs vs. FGAs, which is not driven by high dose FGA comparators, and documents significant differences with respect to this risk between individual SGAs.

Clozapine as a first- or second-line treatment in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

No consensus exists on whether clozapine should be prescribed in early stages of psychosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore focus on the use of clozapine as first-line or second-line treatment in non-treatment-resistant patients.

METHODS

Articles were eligible if they investigated clozapine compared to another antipsychotic as a first- or second-line treatment in non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SCZ) patients and provided data on treatment response. We performed random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were eligible for the systematic review (N = 314 subjects on clozapine and N = 800 on other antipsychotics). Our meta-analysis comparing clozapine to a miscellaneous group of antipsychotics revealed a significant benefit of clozapine (Hedges' g = 0.220, P = 0.026, 95% CI = 0.026-0.414), with no evidence of heterogeneity. In addition, a sensitivity analysis revealed a significant benefit of clozapine over risperidone (Hedges' g = 0.274, P = 0.030, 95% CI = 0.027-0.521).

CONCLUSION

The few eligible trials on this topic suggest that clozapine may be more effective than other antipsychotics when used as first- or second-line treatment. Only large clinical trials may comprehensively probe disease stage-dependent superiority of clozapine and investigate overall tolerability.

Biological Predictors of Clozapine Response: A Systematic Review

Background: Clozapine is the recommended antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) but there is significant variability between patients in the degree to which clozapine will improve symptoms. The biological basis of this variability is unknown. Although clozapine has efficacy in TRS, it can elicit adverse effects and initiation is often delayed. Identification of predictive biomarkers of clozapine response may aid initiation of clozapine treatment, as well as understanding of its mechanism of action. In this article we systematically review prospective or genetic studies of biological predictors of response to clozapine. Methods: We searched the PubMed database until 20th January 2018 for studies investigating "clozapine" AND ("response" OR "outcome") AND "schizophrenia." Inclusion required that studies examined a biological variable in relation to symptomatic response to clozapine. For all studies except genetic-studies, inclusion required that biological variables were measured before clozapine initiation. Results: Ninety-eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review, including neuroimaging, blood-based, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based, and genetic predictors. The majority (70) are genetic studies, collectively investigating 379 different gene variants, however only three genetic variants (DRD3 Ser9Gly, HTR2A His452Tyr, and C825T GNB3) have independently replicated significant findings. Of the non-genetic variables, the most consistent predictors of a good response to clozapine are higher prefrontal cortical structural integrity and activity, and a lower ratio of the dopamine and serotonin metabolites, homovanillic acid (HVA): 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in CSF. Conclusions: Recommendations include that future studies should ensure adequate clozapine trial length and clozapine plasma concentrations, and may include multivariate models to increase predictive accuracy.

Unique Effects of Clozapine: A Pharmacological Perspective

Schizophrenia is a heterogenous and severe neuropsychiatric disorder that affects nearly 1% of the population worldwide. Antipsychotic drugs are the mainstay of treatment, but not all patients with schizophrenia respond to treatment with these agents. Clozapine, the first atypical antipsychotic, is a highly effective medication for patients with schizophrenia who do not respond to other antipsychotics. Although clozapine tends not to produce extrapyramidal symptoms, other side effects of the drug (e.g., agranulocytosis, myocarditis, seizures) limit its widespread use. This chapter reviews clozapine's unique clinical effects and unusual pharmacological profile. In addition to its effects in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine has been shown to decrease suicidality, which occurs at an increased rate in patients with schizophrenia. Still preliminary, but consistent data, also suggest that clozapine limits substance use in these patients, an important effect since substance use disorders are common in patients with schizophrenia and are associated with a poor outcome, including an increased risk for suicide and poor response to treatment. We have suggested, from animal studies, that clozapine's apparent ability to limit substance use may occur through its actions as a weak dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, a potent norepinephrine α-2 receptor antagonist and a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Using animal models, we have built combinations of agents toward creation of safer clozapine-like drugs to reduce substance use in these patients. Future research into the mechanisms of action of clozapine toward the development of safe clozapine-like agents is of great public health importance.

Why don't patients take their medicine? Reasons and solutions in psychiatry

Over the course of a year, about three-quarters of patients prescribed psychotropic medication will discontinue, often coming to the decision themselves and without informing a health professional. Costs associated with unplanned discontinuation may be substantial if left uncorrected. Partial non-adherence (much more common than full discontinuation) can also be detrimental, although some patients rationally adjust their medication regimen without ill-effect. This article reviews the literature on non-adherence, whether intentional or not, and discusses patients' reasons for failure to concord with medical advice, and predictors of and solutions to the problem of non-adherence.

Cognitive function in schizophrenia: conflicting findings and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder with multiple psychopathological domains being affected. Several lines of evidence indicate that cognitive impairment serves as the key component of schizophrenia psychopathology. Although there have been a multitude of cognitive studies in schizophrenia, there are many conflicting results. We reasoned that this could be due to individual differences among the patients (i.e. variation in the severity of positive vs. negative symptoms), different task designs, and/or the administration of different antipsychotics.

METHODS

We thus review existing data concentrating on these dimensions, specifically in relation to dopamine function. We focus on most commonly used cognitive domains: learning, working memory, and attention.

RESULTS

We found that the type of cognitive domain under investigation, medication state and type, and severity of positive and negative symptoms can explain the conflicting results in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This review points to future studies investigating individual differences among schizophrenia patients in order to reveal the exact relationship between cognitive function, clinical features, and antipsychotic treatment.

Clozapine initiation in the community

Aims and Method

The study aims to describe the experience of an assertive community treatment team when commencing clozapine at home rather than in hospital, following a locally-devised policy. Any failed attempts and problems experienced are described.

Results

There have been no serious adverse events with 13 patients who have been started on clozapine at home.

Clinical Implications

For an assertive community treatment team, home-initiation of clozapine is a practical option, particularly when patients refuse to come in to hospital.

Underuse of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Up to a third of patients with schizophrenia develop treatment resistance. Clozapine has been established as the most effective antipsychotic medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, it is significantly underutilised in this population. Possible reasons include clinicians' lack of experience with the drug and negative attitudes towards it. African-Caribbean patients are less likely to be treated with clozapine compared with their White counterparts and more likely to have treatment discontinued due to perceived risk of agranulocytosis. This paper discusses the current evidence relating to the underuse of clozapine and factors responsible for this.

Impact of Clozapine versus Haloperidol on Conditional Release Time and Rates of Revocation in a Forensic Psychiatric Population

Background

Clozapine remains the cornerstone of treatment for treatment refractory schizophrenia. Clozapine has been shown to improve quality of life and cognitive functioning and to reduce hospital days in psychiatric patients. The impact of clozapine in a forensic population of psychiatric patients has not been studied.

Methods

This study is a naturalistic, retrospective database analysis of forensic patients hospitalized at the Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center from January 1, 1990 to August 1, 1999 who were treated with clozapine or haloperidol. Patients were either court ordered for hospitalization as having been found not guilty by reason of insanity or as incompetent to proceed to trial.

Results

Data from 84 patients (69 male, 15 female) were included in the analysis. The primary Axis I diagnoses were substance abuse (n = 61) and schizophrenia (n = 46). Patients had been treated with haloperidol (n = 78) and clozapine (n = 21), and some had received each agent as monotherapy during their course of treatment (n = 15). Assault (n = 22), armed criminal action (n = 18), and burglary (n = 18) were the primary forensic reasons for admission. Of those eligible to obtain a conditional release, 33% of haloperidol-treated patients and 38% of clozapine-treated patients obtained their conditional release on those medications. Haloperidol-treated patients were more likely to have their conditional release revoked (58.8%) versus those treated with clozapine (0%). Clozapine-treated patients were also more likely to stay on conditional release for longer periods of time. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores improved in both treatment groups; however, of 15 patients converted from haloperidol to clozapine, 93% (n = 14) saw improvements in GAP scores.

Conclusions

Clozapine and haloperidol effectively reduce psychosis and aggression. In our study, clozapine-treated patients were more likely to obtain a conditional release and stayed on conditional release for longer periods of time. Although the need exists to study this patient population more closely from a longitudinal standpoint, one may suspect that these findings represent a potential decrease in healthcare costs for the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.

Clozapine Response Rates among People with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Data from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for the 25% to 33% of people with schizophrenia who are treatment resistant, but not all people achieve response. Using data from a previously published clozapine systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the proportion of people who achieved response and examined the absolute and percentage change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. Overall, 40.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.8%-43.4%) responded, with a mean reduction in PANSS of 22.0 points (95% CI, 20.9-23.1), a reduction of 25.8% (95% CI, 24.7%-26.9%) from baseline. These reductions are clinically meaningful. A 40% response rate to clozapine suggests that 12% to 20% of people with schizophrenia will be ultra-resistant.

Cost-effectiveness of 3-month paliperidone therapy for chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

A new depot formulation of paliperidone has been developed that provides effective treatment for schizophrenia for 3 months (PP3M). It has been tested in phase-3 trials, but no data on its cost-effectiveness have been published.

PURPOSE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of PP3M compared with once-monthly paliperidone (PP1M), haloperidol long-acting therapy (HAL-LAT), risperidone microspheres (RIS-LAT), and oral olanzapine (oral-OLZ) for treating chronic schizophrenia in The Netherlands.

METHODS

A previous 1-year decision tree was adapted, based on local inputs supplemented with data from published literature. The primary analysis used DRG costs in 2016 euros from the insurer perspective, as derived from official lists. A micro-costing analysis was also conducted. For the costing scenario, official list prices were used. Clinical outcomes included relapses (treated as outpatients, requiring hospitalization, total), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Rates and utility scores were derived from the literature. Economic outcomes were the incremental cost/QALY-gained or relapse-avoided. Model robustness was examined in scenario, 1-way, and probability sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The expected cost was lowest with PP3M (8,781€), followed by PP1M (10,325€), HAL-LAT (11,278€), RIS-LAT (11,307€), and oral-OLZ (13,556€). PP3M had the fewest total relapses/patient (0.36, 0.94, 1.39, 1.21, and 1.70, respectively), hospitalizations (0.11, 0.46, 0.40, 0.56, and 0.57, respectively), emergency room visits (0.25, 0.48. 0.99, 0.65, and 1.14, respectively) and the most QALYs (0.847, 0.735, 0.709, 0.719, and 0.656, respectively). In both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, PP3M dominated all other drugs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed base case findings. In the costing analysis, total costs were, on average, 31.9% higher than DRGs.

CONCLUSIONS

PP3M dominated all commonly used drugs. It is cost-effective for treating chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands. Results were robust over a wide range of sensitivity analyses. For patients requiring a depot medication, such as those with adherence problems, PP3M appears to be a good alternative anti-psychotic treatment.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Clozapine versus Quetiapine in Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of clozapine and quetiapine in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, open label study of 14 weeks, 53 patients with schizophrenia diagnosed as per ICD-10 and fulfilling the modified version of Conley and Kelly's criteria of TRS were randomly assigned to receive clozapine or quetiapine as per a computer-generated random table. After 2-weeks of dose-titration phase, doses were fixed at minimum therapeutic dose and subsequently adjusted according to the clinical improvement. All patients received dosage of respective drug in therapeutic range. 13 patients were lost to follow up. Treatment efficacy and side effects were evaluated with standardized rating scales.

RESULTS

Clozapine group (reduction in total score: mean=14.45, SD=10.39) had significantly greater reductions (P=0.004; CI=3.541-17.059) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, PANSS positive subscale and PANSS general psychopathology subscale at 14 weeks in comparison to the quetiapine group (reduction in total score: mean=4.15, SD=10.71). Significant reduction in PANSS negative subscale was seen with both drugs but no significant difference was present between the two drugs. At 14 weeks, 30% patients in clozapine group and 15% patients in quetiapine group showed response. Clozapine led to significantly greater side effects (P< 0.001, CI=2.241-6.059) on Glassgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale (GASS) than quetiapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine was found to be more efficacious than quetiapine in patients with TRS but was associated with greater side effects. Both the drugs were found to be equally effective in reducing the negative symptoms.

Drug-Induced Dyskinesia, Part 2: Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia

Dyskinesias encompass a variety of different hyperkinetic phenomenologies, particularly chorea, dystonia, stereotypies, and akathisia. The main types of drug-induced dyskinesias include levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in patients with Parkinson's disease and tardive syndrome (TS), typically present in patients with psychiatric or gastrointenstinal disorders treated with dopamine receptor blocking drugs, also referred to as neuroleptics. Besides preventive measures (i.e., avoiding the use of the offending drugs), general treatment strategies include slow taper of the offending agent and use of dopamine-depleting agents like tetrabenazine. Botulinum toxin may be helpful for wearing off focal dystonia and some forms of tardive dystonia. Deep brain stimulation is usually reserved for patients with disabling motor fluctuations, LID, and for severe TS that cannot be managed medically.

Clozapine v. first- and second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-refractory schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although clozapine is the 'gold standard' for treatment-refractory schizophrenia, meta-analyses of clozapine for this condition are lacking.

AIMS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clozapine treatment for people with treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

METHOD

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's trial register, PubMed and EMBASE and hand-searched key papers for randomised controlled trials of clozapine for treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

RESULTS

Twenty-one papers with 25 comparisons were included. The number needed to treat was 9. Clozapine was superior for positive symptoms in both the short and long term. In the short term only clozapine was superior for total and negative symptoms, with higher response rates. Both funding source and dosage affected results. Higher baseline psychosis scores predicted better outcomes for clozapine in a meta-regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine is superior for treatment-refractory disorder but if there is no response by 6 months medications with lower adverse reactions should be considered.

On the Complexity of Brain Disorders: A Symptom-Based Approach

Mounting evidence shows that brain disorders involve multiple and different neural dysfunctions, including regional brain damage, change to cell structure, chemical imbalance, and/or connectivity loss among different brain regions. Understanding the complexity of brain disorders can help us map these neural dysfunctions to different symptom clusters as well as understand subcategories of different brain disorders. Here, we discuss data on the mapping of symptom clusters to different neural dysfunctions using examples from brain disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In addition, we discuss data on the similarities of symptoms in different disorders. Importantly, computational modeling work may be able to shed light on plausible links between various symptoms and neural damage in brain disorders.

Semiparametric Inference of the Complier Average Causal Effect with Nonignorable Missing Outcomes

Noncompliance and missing data often occur in randomized trials, which complicate the inference of causal effects. When both noncompliance and missing data are present, previous papers proposed moment and maximum likelihood estimators for binary and normally distributed continuous outcomes under the latent ignorable missing data mechanism. However, the latent ignorable missing data mechanism may be violated in practice, because the missing data mechanism may depend directly on the missing outcome itself. Under noncompliance and an outcome-dependent nonignorable missing data mechanism, previous studies showed the identifiability of complier average causal effect for discrete outcomes. In this article, we study the semiparametric identifiability and estimation of complier average causal effect in randomized clinical trials with both all-or-none noncompliance and outcome-dependent nonignorable missing continuous outcomes, and propose a two-step maximum likelihood estimator in order to eliminate the infinite dimensional nuisance parameter. Our method does not need to specify a parametric form for the missing data mechanism. We also evaluate the finite sample property of our method via extensive simulation studies and sensitivity analysis, with an application to a double-blinded psychiatric clinical trial.

[Antipsychotic Treatment of the Adult Patient in the Acute Phase of Schizophrenia]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of different antipsychotic drugs in the management of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in the acute phase. To formulate evidence-based recommendations on the antipsychotic (AP) drug management strategies for the treatment of the adult diagnosed with schizophrenia in the acute phase.

METHOD

Clinical practice guidelines were prepared, using the guidelines of the Methodology Guide of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection, in order to identify, synthesise, and evaluate the evidence and formulate recommendations as regards the management and follow-up of adult patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. The evidence of the NICE 82 guideline was adopted and updated, which answered the question on the management of the acute phase of adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The evidence and its level were presented to the Guideline Development Group (GDG) in order to formulate recommendations following the methodology proposed by the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, amisulpride, paliperidone, haloperidol, quetiapine, and aripiprazole were more effective than placebo for the majority of psychotic symptoms and the abandonment of treatment, but asenapine was not. Paliperidone, risperidone, quetiapine, clozapine, and olanzapine showed significant increases in weight compared to placebo. Haloperidol, risperidone, ziprasidone, and paliperidone had a higher risk of extrapyramidal symptoms than placebo. There was a significant risk of sedation or drowsiness with, risperidone, haloperidol, ziprasidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and clozapine in the comparisons with placebo. Of the results of the comparisons between AP, it was shown that clozapine and paliperidone had a clinically significant effect compared to haloperidol and quetiapine, respectively. Olanzapine and risperidone had a lower risk of abandoning the treatment in general, and due to adverse reactions in two comparisons of each one, haloperidol was the drug with more risk of abandoning due to adverse effects, followed by clozapine. Amisulpride, haloperidol and ziprasidone had favourable results as regards weight increase in several comparisons. Aripiprazole and paliperidone obtained a higher number of favourable results as regards sedation, and all the atypical drugs (except paliperidone) had a lower risk than the use of anti-parkinsonian drugs. Of the evidence from observational studies, it was found that, in subjects with risk factors for diabetes, such as age, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia, the initial treatment and current treatment with olanzapine, as well as current treatment with clozapine, may promote the development of this disease.

CONCLUSION

Although it is imperative to prescribe an antipsychotic for treatment of the acute phase, the selection of the drug depends on the particular clinical condition of each patient and their collateral effects profile.

Clozapine prescribing in the UK: views and experience of consultant psychiatrists

OBJECTIVES

It has been repeatedly shown that clozapine is underutilized and there is delayed use of it in clinical practice.

METHOD

An online survey was sent to 2771 consultant psychiatrists registered with the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the UK. A total of 243 responded to this survey. The survey elicited their views and experiences in using clozapine as well as to identify what may be the underlying causes for its underutilization.

RESULTS

Over 75% acknowledged that they had good training in using clozapine and about 56% had clozapine-dedicated service. However, 40.5% preferred to use several other antipsychotics prior to considering clozapine. A third felt it was not safe to start clozapine in the community and 42% had less than five patients on clozapine. Eleven possible reasons for clozapine underutilization were identified including concerns about side effects, patients not wanting to have blood tests and lack of experience or knowledge. Knowledge deficiency in certain aspects of clozapine use were identified, e.g. a third of respondents did not know that the risk of agranulocytosis changes with time, 42.7% did not think that clozapine can reduce substance use, while 20% were not aware of its benefit in reducing suicidal risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Important areas of concern such as managing side effects and deficiency in evidence-based use of clozapine were identified. These can be targeted in training and professional development programme.