Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators

Lead Management: Device Programming and Defibrillation Threshold Testing

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce sudden cardiac death (SCD) and improve survival in patients with a history of life-threatening arrhythmia or sudden cardiac arrest, and in select populations at high risk of SCD due to ventricular arrhythmias. However, patients with ICDs may receive inappropriate or unnecessary shocks, which have been associated with pro-arrhythmia, psychological sequelae, poor quality of life, and increased mortality. The benefits and risks of ICD therapy are therefore directly impacted on by physician operative and programming decisions. This article aims to provide a detailed review of transvenous ICD programming as guided by clinical trials.

2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play

Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.

Transient pacing in pigs with complete heart block via myocardial injection of mRNA coding for the T-box transcription factor 18

The adenovirus-mediated somatic transfer of the embryonic T-box transcription factor 18 (TBX18) gene can convert chamber cardiomyocytes into induced pacemaker cells. However, the translation of therapeutic TBX18-induced cardiac pacing faces safety challenges. Here we show that the myocardial expression of synthetic TBX18 mRNA in animals generates de novo pacing and limits innate and inflammatory immune responses. In rats, intramyocardially injected mRNA remained localized, whereas direct myocardial injection of an adenovirus carrying a reporter gene resulted in diffuse expression and in substantial spillover to the liver, spleen and lungs. Transient expression of TBX18 mRNA in rats led to de novo automaticity and pacemaker properties and, compared with the injection of adenovirus, to substantial reductions in the expression of inflammatory genes and in activated macrophage populations. In rodent and clinically relevant porcine models of complete heart block, intramyocardially injected TBX18 mRNA provided rate-adaptive cardiac pacing for one month that strongly correlated with the animal's sinus rhythm and physical activity. TBX18 mRNA may aid the development of biological pacemakers.

Dual-chamber vs. single-chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study

AIMS

In complete atrioventricular block (AVB) with underlying sinus rhythm, it is recommended to implant a dual-chamber pacemaker rather than a single-chamber pacemaker. However, no large-scale study has been able to demonstrate the superiority of this choice on hard clinical criteria such as morbimortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective observational study included all patients who received a primary pacemaker implantation in the indication of complete AVB with underlying sinus rhythm in France, based on the national administrative database between January 2013 and December 2022. After propensity score matching, we obtained two groups containing 19 219 patients each. The incidence of all-cause mortality was 9.22%/year for the dual-chamber pacemaker group, compared with 11.48%/year for the single-chamber pacemaker group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.807, P < 0.0001]. Similarly, there was a lower incidence of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.766, P < 0.0001), heart failure (HR 0.908, P < 0.0001), atrial fibrillation (HR 0.778, P < 0.0001), and ischaemic stroke (HR 0.873, P = 0.008) in the dual-chamber pacemaker group than in the single-chamber pacemaker group. Regarding re-interventions and complications, there were fewer upgrades (addition of atrial lead or left ventricular lead) in the dual-chamber group (HR 0.210, P < 0.0001), but more haematomas (HR 1.179, P = 0.006) and lead repositioning (HR 1.123, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In the indication of complete AVB with underlying sinus rhythm, our results are consistent with current recommendations to prefer implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker rather than a single-chamber pacemaker for these patients. Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker is associated with a lower risk of mortality, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke during follow-up.

VDD Lead Extraction-Differences with Other Leads and Practical Tips in Management

Background: VDD (atrial sensing, ventricular sensing/pacing) leads are relatively rarely implanted; therefore, experience in their extraction is very limited. We aimed to investigate whether VDD lead removal may be a risk factor for the increased complexity of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) or major complications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 3808 TLE procedures (including 103 patients with VDD leads). Results: If TLE included VDD lead removal, procedure duration (lead dilation time) was prolonged, complicated extractions were slightly more common, and more advanced tools were required. This is partly due to longer implant duration (in patients with VDD systems-135.2 months; systems without VDD leads-109.3 months; p < 0.001), more frequent presence of abandoned leads (all systems containing VDD leads-22.33% and all systems without VDD leads-10.77%), and partly to the younger age of patients with VDD leads (51.74 vs. 57.72 years; p < 0.001, in the remaining patients) at the time of system implantation. VDD lead extraction does not increase the risk of major complications (1.94 vs. 2.34%; p = 0.905). Conclusions: The extraction of VDD leads may be considered a risk factor for increased procedure complexity, but not for major complications. However, this is not a direct result of VDD lead extraction but specific characteristics of the patients with VDD leads. Operator skill and team experience combined with special custom maneuvers can enable favorable results to be achieved despite the specific design of VDD leads, even with older VDD lead models.

Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Comprehensive epidemiological data are lacking on the incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). This study aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and AF-related adverse outcomes of patients with CIEDs.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study that analyzed patients without prevalent AF who underwent CIED implantation in 2009-2018 using a Korean nationwide claims database. The subjects were divided into three groups by CIED type and indication: pacemaker (n=21,438), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with heart failure (HF) (n=3,450), and ICD for secondary prevention without HF (n=2,146). The incidence of AF, AF-associated predictors, and adverse outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

During follow-up, the incidence of AF was 4.3, 7.3, and 5.1 per 100 person-years in the pacemaker, ICD/CRT with HF, and ICD without HF cohorts, respectively. Across the three cohorts, older age and valvular heart disease were commonly associated with incident AF. Incident AF was consistently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (3.8-11.4-fold), admission for HF (2.6-10.5-fold), hospitalization for any cause (2.4-2.7-fold), all-cause death (4.1-5.0-fold), and composite outcomes (3.4-5.7-fold). Oral anticoagulation rates were suboptimal in patients with incident AF (pacemaker, 51.3%; ICD/CRT with HF, 51.7%; and ICD without HF, 33.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients implanted CIED developed newly diagnosed AF. Incident AF was associated with a higher risk of adverse events. The importance of awareness, early detection, and appropriate management of AF in patients with CIED should be emphasized.

Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Single chamber atrial pacemaker should be sufficient for patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) with normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. However, most patients undergo dual chamber pacemaker implantation because of concern of new onset AV block. The annual incidence of new AV block has been reported from 0.6 to 4.4 % in various studies.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to assess mode survival in sinus node dysfunction with normal AV conduction patients implanted with AAIR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND with normal AV conduction between January 2014 and December 2021 were followed up for pacemaker device change, new onset AV block, bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation (AF), lead complications, reoperation and mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND during the study period. Mean age was 55.6 ± 12.7 years. During a mean follow up of 48.7 ± 24.9 months, none of the patients required pacemaker device change to VVIR/DDDR. Nine patients underwent reoperation, 5 for lead dislodgment, 1 for high threshold, 1 for pocket site erosion and 3 for pulse generator change. None developed AV block or AF with slow ventricular rate. Only 4 patients developed AF (3 paroxysmal,1 permanent). There were 3 deaths during follow up and none were sudden deaths.

CONCLUSION

Single chamber atrial pacing is an acceptable mode of pacing in patients with SND in developing countries. Development of AV conduction abnormalities is rare in this relatively younger population.

Atrial pacing minimization in sinus node dysfunction and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High percentages of atrial pacing have been associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. This study is aimed at evaluating whether atrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

In a nationwide, randomized controlled trial, 540 patients with sinus node dysfunction and an indication for first pacemaker implantation were assigned to pacing programmed to a base rate of 60 bpm and rate-adaptive pacing (DDDR-60) or pacing programmed to a base rate of 40 bpm without rate-adaptive pacing (DDD-40). Patients were followed on remote monitoring for 2 years. The primary endpoint was time to first episode of atrial fibrillation longer than 6 min. Secondary endpoints included longer episodes of atrial fibrillation, and the safety endpoint comprised a composite of syncope or presyncope.

RESULTS

The median percentage of atrial pacing was 1% in patients assigned to DDD-40 and 49% in patients assigned to DDDR-60. The primary endpoint occurred in 124 patients (46%) in each treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.25, P = .83). There were no between-group differences in atrial fibrillation exceeding 6 or 24 h, persistent atrial fibrillation, or cardioversions for atrial fibrillation. The incidence of syncope or presyncope was higher in patients assigned to DDD-40 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.13-2.59, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Programming a base rate of 40 bpm without rate-adaptive pacing is associated with an increased risk of syncope or presyncope.

Comparison of first- and second-generation leadless pacemakers in patients with sinus rhythm and complete atrioventricular block

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of leadless cardiac pacemakers (LPMs) as an alternative to conventional transvenous cardiac pacing have been largely reported. The first generation of the MicraTM transcatheter pacing system (VR; Medtronic) was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemaker syndrome in sinus rhythm patients. A second-generation system (AV) now provides atrioventricular synchrony through atrial mechanical (Am) sensing capability (VDD mode).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare VR and AV systems in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing (Vp) for complete atrioventricular block.

METHODS

All consecutive patients implanted with an LPM in our department for complete atrioventricular block were retrospectively screened. Patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus dysfunction, or Vp burden <20% at 1 month postimplantation were excluded. Patients were systematically followed with a visit at 1 month, and then at least once a year.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients-45 VR (2015-2020) and 48 AV (2020-2021)-were included. VR and AV patients had similar baseline characteristics, except for VR patients being older (80 ± 8 vs. 77 ± 9 years, p = 0.049). The mean Vp burden was 77% in the VR and 82% in the AV group (p = 0.38). In AV patients, the median AV synchronous beats rate was 78%, with 65% having a >66% rate. An E/A ratio <1.2 as measured on echocardiography was the only independent predictor of accurate atrial mechanical tracking (p = 0.01). One-year survival rate was similar in both groups. Five patients in the VR and 0 in the AV group eventually developed pacemaker syndrome within 1 year post-implantation (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In sinus rhythm patients with chronic Vp for complete atrioventricular block implanted with an LPM, the atrial mechanical sensing algorithm allowed significant atrioventricular synchrony in most patients and was associated with no occurrence of-otherwise rare-pacemaker syndrome.

Sinus Node Dysfunction

Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is a multifaceted disorder most prevalent in older individuals, but may also occur at an earlier age. In most cases, the SND diagnosis is ultimately established by documenting its ECG manifestations. EPS has limited utility. The treatment strategy is largely dictated by symptoms and ECG manifestations. Not infrequently, both bradycardia and tachycardia coexist in the same patients, along with other diseases common in the elderly (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease), thereby complicating treatment strategy. Prevention of the adverse consequences of both bradyarrhythmia and tachyarrhythmia is important to reduce susceptibility to syncope, falls, and thromboembolic complications.

Efficacy and Safety of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Octogenarians

INTRODUCTION

Long-term complication rates in standard transvenous pacemakers are reported around 4-12% with a higher incidence in the elderly population. We report our experience in octogenarians undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation in two large-volume centers in Switzerland.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation at two Swiss large volume centers (University Hospital Zurich, Zurich and Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Lugano) between October 2015 and March 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic information, clinical data, and procedural characteristics were recorded at the day of implantation and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty patients (mean age 80.6 ± 7.7 years, male 66%) were included. The main indication for pacemaker implantation was slow ventricular rate atrial fibrillation (111 of 220 patients, 50.4%). Out of the 220 patients, 124 (56.3%) were ≥80 years. Overall successful implantation rate was 98.6%. In the octogenarian population, the median procedure time (45 ± 20.2 min vs. 40 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.03) and radiation duration (6.1 ± 8.2 min vs. 5.0 ± 7.2 min, p = 0.03) were longer compared to patients <80 years. Major complications (2.7%, n = 6) and device measurements during follow-up were similar between patients ≥80 and <80 years.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of a leadless pacemaker device in octogenarians is safe and effective with a similarly low complication rate compared to non-octogenarians.

Case report: Torsade de pointes induced by the bigeminy result from retrograde ventriculoatrial activation in VVI pacing and resolved by intentional atrial pacing

Introduction

While pacing has been used for long QT syndrome (LQTs), the optimal pacing modality is controversial.

Case

We report a woman with bradycardia and a recently implanted single-chamber pacemaker experienced multiple syncope. No device dysfunction was found. Multiple Torsade de Pointes (TdP) induced by the bigeminy result from retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) activation in VVI pacing were demonstrated in the scenario of previously unidentified LQTs. Replacement for a dual-chamber ICD and intentional atrial pacing eliminated the VA conduction and symptoms.

Conclusion

Pacing without atrioventricular sequence might be catastrophic in LQTs. Atrial pacing and atrioventricular synchrony should be highlighted.

Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead?

The history of cardiac pacing dates back to the 1930s with externalized pacing and has evolved to incorporate transvenous, multi-lead, or even leadless devices. Annual implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have increased since the introduction of the implantable system, likely related to expanding indications, and increasing global life expectancy and aging demographics. Here, we summarize the relevant literature on cardiac pacing to demonstrate the enormous impact it has had within the field of cardiology. Further, we look forward to the future of cardiac pacing, including conduction system pacing and leadless pacing strategies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac implantable electronic devices with reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing

AIMS

Reactive atrial-based anti-tachycardia pacing (rATP) in pacemakers (PMs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds) has been reported to prevent progression of atrial fibrillation, and this reduced progression is expected to decrease the risk of complications such as stroke and heart failure (HF). This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of rATP in PMs and CRT-Ds in the Japanese public health insurance system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed a Markov model comprising five states: bradycardia, post-stroke, mild HF, severe HF, and death. For devices with rATP and control devices without rATP, we compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the payer's perspective. Costs were estimated from healthcare resource utilisation data in a Japanese claims database. We evaluated model uncertainty by analysing two scenarios for each device. The ICER was 763 729 JPY/QALY (5616 EUR/QALY) for PMs and 1,393 280 JPY/QALY (10 245 EUR/QALY) for CRT-Ds. In all scenarios, ICERs were below 5 million JPY/QALY (36 765 EUR/QALY), supporting robustness of the results.

CONCLUSION

According to a willingness to pay threshold of 5 million JPY/QALY, the devices with rATP were cost-effective compared with control devices without rATP, showing that the higher reimbursement price of the functional categories with rATP is justified from a healthcare economic perspective.

Sinus node dysfunction: current understanding and future directions

The sinoatrial node (SAN) is the primary pacemaker of the heart. Normal SAN function is crucial in maintaining proper cardiac rhythm and contraction. Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is due to abnormalities within the SAN, which can affect the heartbeat frequency, regularity, and the propagation of electrical pulses through the cardiac conduction system. As a result, SND often increases the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. SND is most commonly seen as a disease of the elderly given the role of degenerative fibrosis as well as other age-dependent changes in its pathogenesis. Despite the prevalence of SND, current treatment is limited to pacemaker implantation, which is associated with substantial medical costs and complications. Emerging evidence has identified various genetic abnormalities that can cause SND, shedding light on the molecular underpinnings of SND. Identification of these molecular mechanisms and pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of SND is hoped to identify novel therapeutic targets for the development of more effective therapies for this disease. In this review article, we examine the anatomy of the SAN and the pathophysiology and epidemiology of SND. We then discuss in detail the most common genetic mutations correlated with SND and provide our perspectives on future research and therapeutic opportunities in this field.

Single-lead VDD pacing: a literature review on short-term and long-term performance

INTRODUCTION

VDD pacing system was introduced more than 30 years ago. Its use is considered by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on cardiac pacing as a potential alternative to dual chambers system for patients with atrioventricular block and normal sinus node function.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we performed a narrative review of current literature in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of this pacing system. VDD system allows the maintenance of AV synchronous pacing and its hemodynamic advantages. Some disadvantages may be related to the non-negligible incidence of atrial undersensing and the possible subsequent need for upgrade to DDD system. On the other hand, shorter implantation time and lower complications rate may be advantages.

EXPERT OPINION

In the modern pacing era, VDD pacing system struggles to find its own space. However, it may still be considered as a valuable alternative to a dual-chamber pacemaker for selected patients, in specific clinical scenarios.

Conduction system pacing: Current status and prospects

Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is the most physiological of all pacing modalities for ventricular capture and a potential alternative to right ventricular pacing. It induces electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, resulting in left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure hospitalization, and atrial arrhythmia. CSP activates the normal conduction system and restores ventricular synchrony. In 2000, HBP was first performed as permanent ventricular pacing, which improved left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The feasibility of permanent HBP has already been demonstrated in patients with bradycardia, although a high capture threshold and limited efficacy for infra-Hisian conduction diseases remain critical issues. The LBBAP is an alternative pacing form that overcomes the limitations of the HBP. A lower capture threshold was obtained at implantation and preserved during the follow-up period in patients with LBBAP. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with HBP or LBBAP may provide better synchronization than the traditional biventricular pacing. Hybrid therapy utilizing HBP or LBBAP in combination with left ventricular pacing has been introduced to treat patients with heart failure. In this review, we have focused on the clinical implications, limitations, and a literature review on CSP.

Cardiomyopathy Associated with Right Ventricular Apical Pacing-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

Bradyarrhythmias are potentially life-threatening medical conditions. The most widespread treatment for slow rhythms is artificial ventricular pacing. From the inception of the idea of artificial pacing, ventricular leads were located in the apex of the right ventricle. Right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) was thought to have a deteriorating effect on left ventricular systolic function. The aim of this study was to systematically assess results of randomized controlled trials to determine the effects of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

we systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE databases for studies evaluating the influence of RVAP on LVEF. Pooled mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random effect model.

RESULTS

14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 885 patients were included. In our meta-analysis, RVAP was associated with statistically significant left ventricular systolic function impairment as measured by LVEF. The mean difference between LVEF at baseline and after intervention amounted to 3.35% (95% CI: 1.80-4.91).

CONCLUSION

our meta-analysis confirms that right ventricular apical pacing is associated with progressive deterioration of left ventricular systolic function.

Catheter ablation for treatment of bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome: is it time to consider it the therapy of choice? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) should be considered as a strategy to avoid pacemaker (PM) implantation for patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (BTS), but lack of evidence is remarkable.

METHODS

Our aim was to conduct a random-effects model meta-analysis on safety and efficacy data from controlled trials and observational studies. We compared atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF progression, procedural complication, additional procedure, cardiovascular death, cardiovascular hospitalization, heart failure and stroke in patients undergoing AFCA vs. PM implantation.

RESULTS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database and Google Scholar were screened, and four retrospective studies were selected. A total of 776 patients (371 in the AFCA group, 405 in the PM group) were included. After a median follow-up of 67.5 months, lower AF recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.06, confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.18, I2 = 82.42%, P < 0.001], AF progression (OR 0.12, CI 0.06-0.26, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001), heart failure (OR 0.12, CI 0.04-0.34, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001), and stroke (OR 0.30, CI 0.15-0.61, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001) were observed in the AFCA group. No differences were observed in cardiovascular death and hospitalization (OR 0.48, CI 0.10-2.28, I2 = 0%, P = 0.358 and OR 0.43, CI 0.14-1.29, I2 = 87.52%, P = 0.134, respectively). Higher need for additional procedures in the AFCA group was highlighted (OR 3.65, CI 1.51-8.84, I2 = 53.75%, P < 0.001). PM implantation was avoided in 91% of BTS patients undergoing AFCA.

CONCLUSIONS

AFCA in BTS patients seems to be more effective than PM implantation in reducing AF recurrence and PM implantation may be waived in most BTS patients treated by AFCA. Need for additional procedures in AFCA patients is balanced by long-term benefit in clinical end points.

Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as a means to preserve or restore physiological ventricular activation via pacing at the His bundle or at more distal targets in the conduction system, including the left bundle branch area. This review examines strengths, weaknesses, and clinical applications of CSP performed via these approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

His bundle pacing (HBP) has been successfully utilized for standard bradyarrhythmia indications and for QRS correction among patients receiving devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Limitations of HBP pacing have included implant complexity and rising pacing thresholds over time. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) appears to deliver similar physiological benefits with shorter implant times and more stable thresholds. More recently, hybrid systems utilizing HBP or LBBAP in combination with left ventricular leads have been used to treat heart failure (HF) patients, and may be useful in multilevel or mixed conduction blocks. There is growing interest in CSP for bradycardia and HF indications, although high quality data with randomized controlled trials are needed to help guide future treatment paradigms.

Clinical Outcomes Of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared To His Bundle Pacing

BACKGROUND

His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiologic form of pacing and has been associated with reduced risk for heart failure hospitalization (HFH) and mortality compared to right ventricular pacing. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a safe and effective alternative option for patients needing ventricular pacing.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between LBBAP and HBP among a large cohort of patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.

METHODS

This observational registry included consecutive patients with AV block/AV node ablation who underwent de novo permanent pacemaker implantations with successful LBBAP or HBP between April 2018 to October 2020. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of time to death from any cause or HFH. Secondary outcomes included the composite endpoint among patients with prespecified ventricular pacing burden and individual outcomes.

RESULTS

The study population included 359 patients who met the inclusion criteria (163 in the HBP and 196 in the LBBAP group). Paced QRSd during LBBAP was similar to HBP (125 ± 20.2 vs 126 ± 23.5 ms, p=0.643). There were no statistically significant differences in the primary composite outcome in LBBAP (17.3%) compared to HBP (24.5%) (HR 1.15, CI 0.72-1.82, p = 0.552). Secondary outcomes of death (10 vs 17%; HR 1.3, CI 0.73-2.33, p=0.38) and HFH (10 vs 12%; HR 1.02,CI 0.54-1.94, p=0.94) were not different among both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes of death or HFH in LBBAP when compared to HBP. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists use with risk of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation among very old patients

It remains unknown whether and to what extend the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) can play a role in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pacemaker implantation in very old patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between oral ACEIs or ARBs and the risk of developing AF in very old patients after pacemaker implantation. Patients above 80 years old with pacemaker implantation and without baseline history of AF were included and their real-world information about ACEIs or ARBs use was extracted from electronic medical records. New AF cases were confirmed via the records of outpatient visits. The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the associations between oral ACEIs or ARBs and risk of AF after pacemaker implantation. Among a total of 388 identified patients aged 80 to 98 years, 118 used ACEIs, 174 had ARBs therapy, and 115 AF were identified after pacemaker implantation during a median follow-up time of 3.1 years. After adjustment for potential confounders, patients with daily use of ARBs had a relatively lower risk of AF after pacemaker implantation (HR: 0.627, 95% CI: 0.425, 0.926; P = 0.019) compared with those non-users, whereas ACEIs therapy didn't show a significant relation with AF risk (HR: 1.335, 95% CI: 0.894, 1.995; P = 0.157). In conclusion, for very old patients with a permanent pacemaker, daily use of oral ARBs was associated with a relative lower risk of AF after pacemaker implantation, however, daily use of ACEIs was not related with AF risk.

Sinus Node Dysfunction

Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is a multifaceted disorder most prevalent in older individuals, but may also occur at an earlier age. In most cases, the SND diagnosis is ultimately established by documenting its ECG manifestations. EPS has limited utility. The treatment strategy is largely dictated by symptoms and ECG manifestations. Not infrequently, both bradycardia and tachycardia coexist in the same patients, along with other diseases common in the elderly (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease), thereby complicating treatment strategy. Prevention of the adverse consequences of both bradyarrhythmia and tachyarrhythmia is important to reduce susceptibility to syncope, falls, and thromboembolic complications.

Patient with sick sinus syndrome and implanted dual-chamber pacemaker with reduced P-wave duration following low interatrial septal pacing: Case report

INTRODUCTION

A dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD/R) for a sinus node disease is sometimes referred to as a physiological pacemaker as it maintains atrioventricular synchrony, however several clinical trials have proved its inferiority to a nonphysiological single-chamber ventricular back-up pacing.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A subject of the study is a 74-year-old woman with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and a previously implanted physiological DDD/R pacemaker. The SSS was diagnosed because of patient's very slow sinus rhythm of about 36 bpm, and due to several episodes of dizziness. After the DDD/R implantation the percentage of atrial pacing approached 100%, with almost none ventricular pacing.

DIAGNOSES

Sick sinus syndrome, complete Bachmann's bundle block, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was previously implanted with a physiological DDD/R pacemaker. Several years after the implantation, the atrial fibrillation was diagnosed and the pulmonary vein isolation was then performed by cryoablation. During the follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation, the improvement of mitral filling parameters was assessed using echocardiography. Shortly thereafter the patient developed the persistent paroxysm of a typical atrial flutter which was successfully terminated using a radiofrequency ablation. No recurrence thereof has been observed ever since (24 months).

OUTCOMES

The atrial electrode of the pacing system was implanted within the low interatrial septal region that resulted in a reduced P-wave duration compared to native sinus rhythm P-waves. The said morphology was deformed because of the complete Bachmann bundle block. That approach, despite a nonphysiological direction of an atrial activation, yielded relatively short P-waves (paced P-wave: 179 ms vs intrinsic sinus P-wave: 237 ms). It also contributed to a significantly shorter PR interval (paced PR: 204 ms vs sinus rhythm PR: 254 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors took into consideration different aspects of alternative right atrial pacing sites. This report has shown that in some patients with a sinus node disease, low interatrial septal pacing can reduce the P-wave duration but does not prevent from the development of atrial arrhythmias.

Association of furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide use with risk of atrial fibrillation post pacemaker implantation among elderly patients

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) induced by artificial pacing is directly related to atrial remodeling. Previous basic research has shown that furosemide aggravates pathologic myocardial remodeling while hydrochlorothiazide alleviates it. However, whether furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide plays a role in developing AF after pacemaker implantation remains unknown. The study aims to investigate the association between oral furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide and the risk of developing AF after pacemaker implantation.

Methods

After a review of electronic medical records, elderly patients with pacemaker implantation and without a known baseline history of AF were included and information on their use of daily oral furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide was extracted. New incident AF cases were confirmed via the records of outpatient visits. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the association between daily oral furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide and risk of developing AF after pacemaker implantation, after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

Among a total of 551 patients aged more than 65 years, 157 AF cases were identified after pacemaker implantation during a maximum follow up of 3.0±1.6 years. Of these, 242 had used furosemide and 97 had used hydrochlorothiazide therapy. Patients taking daily oral furosemide had a relatively higher risk of AF after pacemaker implantation [hazard ratio (HR): 1.507, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.036–2.192; P=0.032] after being adjusted for related disease and prescribed medications, while oral taking of hydrochlorothiazide was shown to be a non-effective factor (HR: 0.666, 95% CI: 0.413–1.074), which had no statistical significance.

Conclusions

Daily oral furosemide might increase the risk of developing AF after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients, while hydrochlorothiazide has no detrimental effect.

Impact of a poor functional capacity on the clinical outcomes in patients with a pacemaker implantation -Results from the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society Registry

BACKGROUND

Functional capacity (FC) correlates with mortality in various cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to examine whether cardiac pacemaker implantations improve the FC and affect the prognosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 621 de novo pacemaker recipients (age 76 ± 9 years, 50.7% male). The FC was assessed by metabolic equivalents (METs) during the implantation and periodically thereafter. The patients were a priori classified into poor FC (<2 METs, n = 40), moderate FC (2 ≤ METs < 4, n = 239), and good FC (≥4 METs, n = 342). Three months after the pacemaker implantation, poor FC or moderate FC patients improved to a good FC by 43%. The distribution of the three FCs remained at those levels until after 1 year of follow-up (P = .18). During a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 71 patients (11%) had cardiovascular hospitalizations and 35 (5.6%) all-cause death. A multivariate Cox analysis revealed that a poor FC at baseline was an independent predictor of both cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 2.494, P = .012) and all-cause death (HR 3.338, P = .016). One year after the pacemaker implantation, the eight who remained with a poor FC had a high mortality rate of 37.5% (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the poor or moderate FC patients improved to good FC 3 months after the pacemaker implantation. The baseline FC predicted the prognosis, and patients with an improved FC after the pacemaker implantation had a better prognosis.

Cardiac Stimulation in the Third Millennium: Where Do We Head from Here?

Over the years, pacemakers have evolved from a life-saving tool to prevent asystole to a device to treat heart rhythm disorders and heart failure, aiming at improving both cardiac function and clinical outcomes. Cardiac stimulation nowadays aims to correct the electrophysiologic roots of mechanical inefficiency in different structural heart diseases. This has led to awareness of the concealed risks of customary cardiac pacing that can inadvertently cause atrioventricular and inter-/intra-ventricular dyssynchrony, and has promoted the development of new pacing modalities and the use of stimulation sites different from the right atrial appendage and the right ventricular apex. The perspective of truly physiologic pacing is the leading concept of the continued research in the past 30 years, which has made cardiac stimulation procedure more sophisticated and challenging. In this article, we analyze the emerging evidence in favor of the available strategies to achieve an individualized physiologic setting in bradycardia pacing.

Pacing devices to treat bradycardia: current status and future perspectives

Introduction: Cardiac stimulation evolved from life-saving devices to prevent asystole to the treatment of heart rhythm disorders and heart failure, capable of remote patient and disease-progression monitoring. Cardiac stimulation nowadays aims to correct the electrophysiologic roots of mechanical inefficiency in different structural heart diseases.Areas covered: Clinical experience, as per available literature, has led to awareness of the concealed risks of customary cardiac pacing, that can inadvertently cause atrio-ventricular and inter/intra-ventricular dyssynchrony. New pacing modalities have emerged, leading to a new concept of what truly represents 'physiologic pacing' beyond maintenance of atrio-ventricular coupling. In this article we will analyze the emerging evidence in favor of the available strategies to achieve an individualized physiologic setting in bradycardia pacing, and the hints of future developments.Expert opinion: 'physiologic stimulation' technologies should evolve to enable an effective and widespread adoption. In one way new guiding catheters and the adoption of electrophysiologic guidance and non-fluoroscopic lead implantation are needed to make His-Purkinje pacing successful and effective at long term in a shorter procedure time; in the other way leadless stimulation needs to upgrade to a superior physiologic setting to mimic customary DDD pacing and possibly His-Purkinje pacing.

Inappropriate tachycardia at rest as a consequence of atrial preference pacing algorithm

A 34-year-old female with a past medical history of sick sinus syndrome which requiring placement of single chamber (atrial) permanent pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). One year after pacemaker implantation, the patient reported exercise intolerance and palpitation at rest. Device interrogation during clinic visit revealed 99% atrial pacing and high atrial rate episodes. What is the mechanism for high atrial rate episodes? Atrial preference pacing (algorithm is a promising method for preventing atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with an implanted pacemaker. However, instead of using nominal search interval settings, which may not benefit patients, we should individually tailor the programming, identifying the most effective search interval and be aware of possible pro-arrhythmic effects.

Patient selection, pacing indications, and subsequent outcomes with de novo leadless single-chamber VVI pacing

AIMS

Patient selection is a key component of securing optimal patient outcomes with leadless pacing. We sought to describe and compare patient characteristics and outcomes of Micra patients with and without a primary pacing indication associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Micra IDE trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The primary outcome (risk of cardiac failure, pacemaker syndrome, or syncope related to the Micra system or procedure) was compared between successfully implanted patients from the Micra IDE trial with a primary pacing indication associated with AF or history of AF (AF group) and those without (non-AF group). Among 720 patients successfully implanted with Micra, 228 (31.7%) were in the non-AF group. Reasons for selecting VVI pacing in non-AF patients included an expectation for infrequent pacing (66.2%) and advanced age (27.2%). More patients in the non-AF group had a condition that precluded the use of a transvenous pacemaker (9.6% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.013). Atrial fibrillation patients programmed to VVI received significantly more ventricular pacing compared to non-AF patients (median 67.8% vs. 12.6%; P < 0.001). The overall occurrence of the composite outcome at 24 months was 1.8% with no difference between the AF and non-AF groups (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 0.45-4.2; P = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-third of patients selected to receive Micra VVI therapy were for indications not associated with AF. Non-AF VVI patients required less frequent pacing compared to patients with AF. Risks associated with VVI therapy were low and did not differ in those with and without AF.

Pacemaker generator replacement as a key to the puzzle of dyspnoea in a community dwelling centenarian

A 104-year-old woman presented with dyspnoea. Workup revealed normal troponins, elevated D-dimer at 2285 with subsequent chest CT angiogram negative for pulmonary embolism. NT-pro BNP elevated to 5208 pg/mL. Chest X-ray revealed mild cardiac enlargement with bilateral pleural effusions. ECG revealed accelerated junctional rhythm. The initial plan was to obtain transthoracic echocardiogram and start diuresis for presumed heart failure. Given her specific cardiac history, pacemaker interrogation was ordered which revealed her pacemaker mode changed from DDDR to VVI. She underwent pacemaker battery exchange with complete resolution in her symptoms and ability to return to prior functional status. Overall, dyspnoea in centenarians could be multifactorial. Pacemaker elective replacement mode secondary to end of life battery can present as non-specific cardio respiratory symptoms. As the pacemaker population ages to the survival beyond the battery life, pacemaker aetiology behind heart failure symptoms needs to be highly considered by medical providers.

Single-chamber leadless pacemaker for atrial synchronous or ventricular pacing

Leadless pacing is a major breakthrough in the management of bradyarrhythmia. Results of initial clinical trials that have demonstrated a significant reduction in acute and long-term pacing-related complications have been confirmed by real-world experience in a broader spectrum of patients. Nonetheless current use of a leadless pacemaker is hampered by its limited atrial sensing and pacing capability, as well as battery life-span and retrievability. We review the current clinical outcome data, indications and contraindications, implantation and retrieval techniques, synchronous ventricular pacing, and other clinical considerations. We also provide an overview of the latest advancements in leadless pacing technology including device-to-device communication and energy harvesting technology.

Comparison of prognosis and safety of pacemaker implantation in patients aged less than or 85 years and older

PURPOSE

Cardiac conduction disturbance necessitating pacemaker implantation is common among elderly patients. However, patients often have comorbidities and increased frailty which may result in limited life prognosis and a high rate of procedure-related complications. We evaluated pacemaker implantation in older patients by comparing life prognosis and complication rate in patients aged ≥ and < 85 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 262 consecutive patients who underwent initial pacemaker implantation for bradycardia (age, 77 ± 10 years old; male, 132 (50%); dual chamber pacemaker, 222 (85%) patients). Acute and long-term outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥ 85 and < 85 years. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and severe procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

Seven (14%) patients aged ≥ 85 years (n = 50; 19%) were non-ambulatory. During 2-year follow-up, primary outcome (death or severe complication) occurred in 47 (18%). Freedom from primary outcome was similar between age groups (81.6% versus 80.8%; p = 0.98). Freedom from all-cause death and from severe complication in the study period were also similar (all-cause death, 91.6% versus 88.7%, p = 0.70; severe complication, 89.7% versus 91.5%, p = 0.75). On multivariate analysis, sick sinus syndrome (hazard ratio (HR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.4, p = 0.03), immunosuppressant use (HR 21 (95% CI 3.3-134), p < 0.01), and high C-reactive protein (HR 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-1.9), p < 0.01) were independent predictors of primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Life prognosis and severe complication rates after pacemaker implantation were similar between patients aged ≥ and < 85 years.

Nonpharmacological Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: What Is the Role of Device Therapy?

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in the adult population, and its incidence and prevalence are still rising. Cardiac devices are widely used in clinical practice in the management of various rhythm disturbances and heart failure treatment. Many patients who receive a pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy also experience atrial fibrillation in the course of their life. Therefore, this review aims to describe the role of these devices in the treatment and prevention of atrial fibrillation in the device recipients. In addition, all these implantable devices also serve as permanent ECG (electrocardiogram) monitors, thus providing important information about the presence and characteristics of atrial fibrillation that may or may not be detected by the patient but can modify our therapeutical approach with regard to the stroke prevention.

Molecular Signatures of Sinus Node Dysfunction Induce Structural Remodeling in the Right Atrial Tissue

The sinus node (SN) is located at the apex of the cardiac conduction system, and SN dysfunction (SND)-characterized by electrical remodeling-is generally attributed to idiopathic fibrosis or ischemic injuries in the SN. SND is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disorders, including syncope, heart failure, and atrial arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation. One of the histological SND hallmarks is degenerative atrial remodeling that is associated with conduction abnormalities and increased right atrial refractoriness. Although SND is frequently accompanied by increased fibrosis in the right atrium (RA), its molecular basis still remains elusive. Therefore, we investigated whether SND can induce significant molecular changes that account for the structural remodeling of RA. Towards this, we employed a rabbit model of experimental SND, and then compared the genome-wide RNA expression profiles in RA between SND-induced rabbits and sham-operated controls to identify the differentially expressed transcripts. The accompanying gene enrichment analysis revealed extensive pro-fibrotic changes within 7 days after the SN ablation, including activation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling and alterations in the levels of extracellular matrix components and their regulators. Importantly, our findings suggest that periostin, a matricellular factor that regulates the development of cardiac tissue, might play a key role in mediating TGF-β-signaling-induced aberrant atrial remodeling. In conclusion, the present study provides valuable information regarding the molecular signatures underlying SND-induced atrial remodeling, and indicates that periostin can be potentially used in the diagnosis of fibroproliferative cardiac dysfunctions.

Uso Racional dos Cabos-Eletrodos na Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial

Introdução: Os dispositivos cardíacos eletrônicos implantáveis (DCEIs) são terapia consagrada para o tratamento de bradiarritmias, prevenção de morte súbita ou insuficiência cardíaca. Desde o primeiro implante de marcapasso transvenoso há mais de 60 anos, ocorreram avanços tecnológicos dos dispositivos e melhorias nas técnicas cirúrgicas. No entanto esse tipo de terapia ainda está associado a complicações significativas, a maioria relacionada ao implante dos cabos-eletrodos transvenosos. Objetivo: apresentar uma reflexão sobre como praticar o uso racional do implante de cabos-eletrodos e propor estratégias e alternativas para postergá-lo ou evitá-lo, com base nos conhecimentos atuais nos diversos campos da estimulação cardíaca artificial. Métodos: Revisão da literatura que utilizou artigos de 1995 a 2019, de diversas plataformas e revistas. Conclusão:Há a expectativa de que nos próximos anos ocorram avanços tecnológicos e de conhecimento no campo da estimulação leadless, permitindo que esses dispositivos sejam incorporados na prática clínica de maneira rotineira. Atualmente, se o implante de eletrodos ventriculares nos casos de doença do nó sinusal com condução atrioventricular preservada for racionalizado, o implante de eletrodos atriais nos cardiodesfibriladores implantáveis (CDI) sem necessidade de estimulação antibradicardia ou dos eletrodos ventriculares nos casos sem a necessidade de estimulação antitaquicardia (ATP) considerando o implante de CDIs subcutâneos, este artigo terá cumprido o seu papel.

Rational Use of Leads in Artificial Cardiac Pacing

Introduction: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIEDs) are a proven therapy for the treatment of bradyarrhythmias, prevention of sudden death or heart failure. Since the first transvenous pacemaker implantation more than 60 years ago, technological advances in devices and improvements in surgical techniques have occurred. However, this type of therapy is still associated with significant complications, most of them related to the implantation of transvenous leads. Objective: To present a reflection on how to practice the rational use of lead implantation and propose strategies and alternatives to delay or avoid it, based on the current knowledge in the various fields of artificial cardiac stimulation. Methods: Review of literature that used articles from 1995 to 2019, from several platforms and periodicals. Conclusion: There is an expectation that in the coming years there will be technological and knowledge advances in the field of leadless stimulation, allowing these devices to be incorporated into clinical practice in a routine manner. Currently, if the implantation of ventricular electrodes in cases of sinus node disease with preserved atrioventricular conduction is rationalized, the implantation of atrial electrodes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) without the necessity of antibradicardia stimulation or ventricular electrodes in cases without the necessity of antitachycardia stimulation (ATP) considering the subcutaneous ICD implantation, this article will have fulfilled its role.

Antegrade Conduction Rescues Right Ventricular Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Complete Heart Block

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) occurs in ∼30% of patients with RV leads. This study evaluated the long-term effects of restoring antegrade conduction with a biological pacemaker in a porcine model of RV PICM.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine if antegrade biological pacing can attenuate RV PICM.

METHODS

In pigs with complete atrioventricular (AV) block, transcription factor T-box 18 (TBX18) was injected into the His bundle region in either of 2 experimental protocols: protocol A sought to prevent PICM, and protocol B sought to reverse PICM. In protocol A, we injected adenoviral vectors expressing TBX18 (or the reporter construct green fluorescent protein) after AV node ablation, and observed the animals for 8 weeks. In protocol B, PICM was established by using AV node ablation and 4 weeks of electronic RV pacing, at which point TBX18 was injected into the His bundle region.

RESULTS

In protocol A, TBX18 biological pacing led to superior chronotropic support (62.4 ± 3 beats/min vs. 50.4 ± 0.4 beats/min; p = 0.01), lower backup pacemaker utilization (45 ± 2.6% vs. 94.6 ± 1.4%; p = 0.001), and greater ejection fraction (58.5 ± 1.3% vs. 46.7 ± 2%; p = 0.001). In protocol B, full-blown RV PICM was evident 4 weeks after complete AV block in both groups; subsequent intervention led to higher mean heart rate (56 ± 2 beats/min vs. 50.1 ± 0.4 beats/min; p = 0.05), less backup pacemaker utilization (53 ± 8.2% vs. 95 ± 1.6%; p = 0.003), and a greater ejection fraction (61.7 ± 1.3% vs. 49 ± 1.6%; p = 0.0003) in TBX18-injected animals versus control animals.

CONCLUSIONS

In a preclinical model, pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy can be prevented, and reversed, by restoring antegrade conduction with TBX18 biological pacing.