Hypothermia for Intracranial Hypertension after Traumatic Brain Injury

Application of artificial hibernation technology in acute brain injury

Controlling intracranial pressure, nerve cell regeneration, and microenvironment regulation are the key issues in reducing mortality and disability in acute brain injury. There is currently a lack of effective treatment methods. Hibernation has the characteristics of low temperature, low metabolism, and hibernation rhythm, as well as protective effects on the nervous, cardiovascular, and motor systems. Artificial hibernation technology is a new technology that can effectively treat acute brain injury by altering the body's metabolism, lowering the body's core temperature, and allowing the body to enter a state similar to hibernation. This review introduces artificial hibernation technology, including mild hypothermia treatment technology, central nervous system regulation technology, and artificial hibernation-inducer technology. Upon summarizing the relevant research on artificial hibernation technology in acute brain injury, the research results show that artificial hibernation technology has neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and oxidative stress-resistance effects, indicating that it has therapeutic significance in acute brain injury. Furthermore, artificial hibernation technology can alleviate the damage of ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and other diseases, providing new strategies for treating acute brain injury. However, artificial hibernation technology is currently in its infancy and has some complications, such as electrolyte imbalance and coagulation disorders, which limit its use. Further research is needed for its clinical application.

A Comprehensive Perspective on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Individualized Management in Neurocritical Care: Results of a Survey with Global Experts

BACKGROUND

Numerous trials have addressed intracranial pressure (ICP) management in neurocritical care. However, identifying its harmful thresholds and controlling ICP remain challenging in terms of improving outcomes. Evidence suggests that an individualized approach is necessary for establishing tolerance limits for ICP, incorporating factors such as ICP waveform (ICPW) or pulse morphology along with additional data provided by other invasive (e.g., brain oximetry) and noninvasive monitoring (NIM) methods (e.g., transcranial Doppler, optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound, and pupillometry). This study aims to assess current ICP monitoring practices among experienced clinicians and explore whether guidelines should incorporate ancillary parameters from NIM and ICPW in future updates.

METHODS

We conducted a survey among experienced professionals involved in researching and managing patients with severe injury across low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). We sought their insights on ICP monitoring, particularly focusing on the impact of NIM and ICPW in various clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

From October to December 2023, 109 professionals from the Americas and Europe participated in the survey, evenly distributed between LMIC and HIC. When ICP ranged from 22 to 25 mm Hg, 62.3% of respondents were open to considering additional information, such as ICPW and other monitoring techniques, before adjusting therapy intensity levels. Moreover, 77% of respondents were inclined to reassess patients with ICP in the 18-22 mm Hg range, potentially escalating therapy intensity levels with the support of ICPW and NIM. Differences emerged between LMIC and HIC participants, with more LMIC respondents preferring arterial blood pressure transducer leveling at the heart and endorsing the use of NIM techniques and ICPW as ancillary information.

CONCLUSIONS

Experienced clinicians tend to personalize ICP management, emphasizing the importance of considering various monitoring techniques. ICPW and noninvasive techniques, particularly in LMIC settings, warrant further exploration and could potentially enhance individualized patient care. The study suggests updating guidelines to include these additional components for a more personalized approach to ICP management.

Association Between Temperature During Intensive Care Unit and Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The relationship between body temperature changes and prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains inconclusive. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical value of body temperature in the management of ARDS. Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database were collected. Adult patients with ARDS were enrolled and further grouped based on their temperature values in the intensive care unit. Both the maximum (temperaturemax) and minimum (temperaturemin) temperatures were used. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality rate. Polynomial regression, subgroup analysis, and logistic regression analysis were performed in the final analysis. A total of 3922 patients with ARDS were enrolled. There was a U-shaped relationship between 28-day mortality and body temperature. For patients with infection, the elevated temperaturemax (≥37.0°C) was associated with decreased mortality, with an odds ratio ranging from 0.39 to 0.49, using temperaturemax from 36.5°C to 36.9°C as reference. For patients without infection, a similar tendency was observed, but the protective effect was lost at extremely high temperatures (≥38.0°C, p < 0.05). Elevated temperaturemin (≥37.0°C) and decreased temperaturemin (<35.0°C) were associated with increased mortality, using the temperaturemin from 36.0°C to 36.9°C as a reference. Hypothermia was associated with increased mortality in patients with ARDS, while the effect of hyperthermia (≥37.0°C) on the mortality of patients with ARDS was not fully consistent in the infection and noninfection subgroups. Short-term and transient temperatures above 37.0°C would be beneficial to patients with ARDS, but extreme hyperthermia and persistent temperatures above 37.0°C should be avoided.

Current status and outlook for the management of intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury: decompressive craniectomy, therapeutic hypothermia, and barbiturates

INTRODUCTION

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) has been associated with poor neurological outcomes and increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Traditionally, ICP-lowering therapies are administered using an escalating approach, with more aggressive options reserved for patients showing no response to first-tier interventions, or with refractory intracranial hypertension.

DEVELOPMENT

The therapeutic value and the appropriate timing for the use of rescue treatments for intracranial hypertension have been a subject of constant debate in literature. In this review, we discuss the main management options for refractory intracranial hypertension after severe TBI in adults. We intend to conduct an in-depth revision of the most representative randomised controlled trials on the different rescue treatments, including decompressive craniectomy, therapeutic hypothermia, and barbiturates. We also discuss future perspectives for these management options.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence appears to show that mortality can be reduced when rescue interventions are used as last-tier therapy; however, this benefit comes at the cost of severe disability. The decision of whether to perform these interventions should always be patient-centred and made on an individual basis. The development and integration of different physiological variables through multimodality monitoring is of the utmost importance to provide more robust prognostic information to patients facing these challenging decisions.

Effect of Hypothermia Therapy on Children with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hypothermia therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, some trials have shown that hypothermia therapy has a negative effect on patients with TBI. The treatment of hypothermia in children with TBI remains controversial. We conducted a search of six online databases to validate the literature on comparing hypothermia with normal therapy for children with TBI. Eight randomized controlled trials (514 patients) were included. The meta-analysis indicated that hypothermia therapy may increase the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. However, in terms of improving the rate of complications, intracranial pressure (ICP), mortality, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and length of stay both in hospital as well as pediatric ICU, the difference was not statistically significant. Hypothermia therapy may have clinical advantages in improving the GOS scores in children with TBI compared with normothermic therapy, but hypothermia therapy may have no benefit in improving the incidence of complications, ICP, mortality, CPP, and length of stay both in pediatric ICU as well as hospital. The decision to implement hypothermia therapy for children with TBI depends on the advantages and disadvantages from many aspects and these must be considered comprehensively.

Correlation between 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, sFlt-1, PLGF, and Hypertension in Pregnancy

Gestational hypertension is a common disease in clinical practice, which does great harm to the mother and infant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D, sFlt-1, and PLGF and hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy. Specimen preparation: after delivery or placental caesarean section, in order to avoid calcification and necrosis in the middle of the placenta, an area of about 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm should be separated immediately. After dehydration, use a Citadel 2000 dryer to dry it and place it in a block of saline for xylene immunohistochemical staining. Statistical processing was performed according to the proportion of positive cells in each part and the depth of staining. Placental tissue collection and treatment: within 20 minutes after the delivery of the placenta, two pieces of the placental tissue (about 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm) were taken from the central zone of the placental maternal surface without obvious bleeding and calcification. They were rinsed repeatedly in normal saline, fixed in 10% neutral formaldehyde solution for 24 hours, dehydrated using an automatic dehydrator, and embedded in paraffin for detection. Before the study, 20 ml of distilled water was added to the sample to stand for 20 minutes; the Cobas E610 immunoanalyzer was turned on, and sFlt-1 and PLGF (placental growth factor) were selected. The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of pregnant women was detected in the fasting state at 24-28 weeks of gestation, and the best collection time was 8 : 00-11 : 00 in the morning. 5 ml of the whole blood sample without anticoagulant was collected and stored at 0-4°C in a cold storage and dark environment. The serum was obtained by high-speed centrifugation within 24 hours after collection. The method is suitable for the quantitative determination of 25-OH-vitamin D in human serum. In the hypertensive pregnancy group, the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 18.44 ± 3.48 ng/ml, and the sFlt-1/PLGF level was highest at 0-5 weeks followed by 5-10 weeks, 10-15 weeks, and 15-20 weeks. This study provides new ideas and experimental clues for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia.

Verticalization for Refractory Intracranial Hypertension: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Severe intracranial hypertension is strongly associated with mortality. Guidelines recommend medical management involving sedation, hyperosmotic agents, barbiturates, hypothermia, and surgical intervention. When these interventions are maximized or are contraindicated, refractory intracranial hypertension poses risk for herniation and death. We describe a novel intervention of verticalization for treating intracranial hypertension refractory to aggressive medical treatment.

METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective review of six cases of refractory intracranial hypertension in a tertiary care center. All patients were treated with a standard-of-care algorithm for lowering intracranial pressure (ICP) yet maintained an ICP greater than 20 mmHg. They were then treated with verticalization for at least 24 h. We compared the median ICP, the number of ICP spikes greater than 20 mmHg, and the percentage of ICP values greater than 20 mmHg in the 24 h before verticalization vs. after verticalization. We assessed the use of hyperosmotic therapies and any changes in the mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure related with the intervention.

RESULTS

Five patients were admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage and one with intracerebral hemorrhage. All patients had ICP monitoring by external ventricular drain. The median opening pressure was 30 mmHg (25th-75th interquartile range 22.5-30 mmHg). All patients demonstrated a reduction in ICP after verticalization, with a significant decrease in the median ICP (12 vs. 8 mmHg; p < 0.001), the number of ICP spikes (12 vs. 2; p < 0.01), and the percentage of ICP values greater than 20 mmHg (50% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.01). There was a decrease in total medical interventions after verticalization (79 vs. 41; p = 0.05) and a lower total therapy intensity level score after verticalization. The most common adverse effects included asymptomatic bradycardia (n = 3) and pressure wounds (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Verticalization is an effective noninvasive intervention for lowering ICP in intracranial hypertension that is refractory to aggressive standard management and warrants further study.

Age- and Severity-Related In-Hospital Mortality Trends and Risks of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Japan: A Nationwide 10-Year Retrospective Study

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in severely-injured patients worldwide. This retrospective nationwide study aimed to evaluate the age- and severity-related in-hospital mortality trends and mortality risks of patients with severe TBI from 2009 to 2018 to establish effective injury prevention measures. We retrieved information from the Japan Trauma Data Bank dataset between 2009 and 2018. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients with severe TBI defined as those with an Injury Severity Score ≥ 16 and TBI. In total, 31,953 patients with severe TBI (32.6%) were included. There were significant age-related differences in characteristics, mortality trend, and mortality risk in patients with severe TBI. The in-hospital mortality trend of all patients with severe TBI significantly decreased but did not improve for patients aged ≤ 5 years and with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 3 and 8. Severe TBI, age ≥ 65 years, fall from height, GCS score 3-8, and urgent blood transfusion need were associated with a higher mortality risk, and mortality risk did not decrease after 2013. Physicians should consider specific strategies when treating patients with any of these risk factors to reduce severe TBI mortality.

Current status and outlook for the management of intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury: decompressive craniectomy, therapeutic hypothermia, and barbiturates

INTRODUCTION

Increased intracranial pressure has been associated with poor neurological outcomes and increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Traditionally, intracranial pressure-lowering therapies are administered using an escalating approach, with more aggressive options reserved for patients showing no response to first-tier interventions, or with refractory intracranial hypertension.

DEVELOPMENT

The therapeutic value and the appropriate timing for the use of rescue treatments for intracranial hypertension have been a subject of constant debate in literature. In this review, we discuss the main management options for refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury in adults. We intend to conduct an in-depth revision of the most representative randomised controlled trials on the different rescue treatments, including decompressive craniectomy, therapeutic hypothermia, and barbiturates. We also discuss future perspectives for these management options.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence appears to show that mortality can be reduced when rescue interventions are used as last-tier therapy; however, this benefit comes at the cost of severe disability. The decision of whether to perform these interventions should always be patient-centred and made on an individual basis. The development and integration of different physiological variables through multimodality monitoring is of the utmost importance to provide more robust prognostic information to patients facing these challenging decisions.

A meta-analysis of the effects of therapeutic hypothermia in adult patients with traumatic brain injury

Purpose

Therapeutic hypothermia management remains controversial in patients with traumatic brain injury. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the risks and benefits of therapeutic hypothermia management in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Methods

We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (Central) and Clinical Trials databases from inception to January 17, 2019. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that investigated therapeutic hypothermia management versus normothermia management in patients with traumatic brain injury. We collected the individual data of the patients from each included study. Meta-analyses were performed for 6-month mortality, unfavourable functional outcome and pneumonia morbidity. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results

Twenty-three trials involving a total of 2796 patients were included. The randomised controlled trials with a high quality show significantly more mortality in the therapeutic hypothermia group [risk ratio (RR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.53, p = 0.02]. Lower mortality in the therapeutic hypothermia group occurred when therapeutic hypothermia was received within 24 h (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96, p = 0.01), when hypothermia was received for treatment (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.88, p = 0.006) or when hypothermia was combined with post-craniectomy measures (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.00, p = 0.05). The risk of unfavourable functional outcome following therapeutic hypothermia management appeared to be significantly reduced (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.91, p = 0.001). The meta-analysis suggested that there was a significant increase in the risk of pneumonia with therapeutic hypothermia management (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.97, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that therapeutic hypothermia did not reduce but might increase the mortality rate of patients with traumatic brain injury in some high-quality studies. However, traumatic brain injury patients with elevated intracranial hypertension could benefit from hypothermia in therapeutic management instead of prophylaxis when initiated within 24 h.

Dynamic Thermal Mapping of Localized Therapeutic Hypothermia in the Brain

Although whole body cooling is used widely to provide therapeutic hypothermia for the brain, there are undesirable clinical side effects. Selective brain cooling may allow for rapid and controllable neuroprotection while mitigating these undesirable side effects. We evaluated an innovative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cooling platform that utilizes chilled saline pumped through surgically implanted intraventricular catheters to induce hypothermia. Magnetic resonance thermal imaging of the healthy sheep brain (n = 4) at 7.0T provided dynamic temperature measurements from the whole brain. Global brain temperature was 38.5 ± 0.8°C at baseline (body temperature of 39.2 ± 0.4°C), and decreased by 3.1 ± 0.3°C over ∼30 min of cooling (p < 0.0001). Significant cooling was achieved in all defined regions across both the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres relative to catheter placement. On cooling cessation, global brain temperature increased by 3.1 ± 0.2°C over ∼20 min (p < 0.0001). Rapid and synchronized temperature fall/rise on cooling onset/offset was observed reproducibly with rates ranging from 0.06-0.21°C/min, where rewarming was faster than cooling (p < 0.0001) signifying the importance of thermoregulation in the brain. Although core regions (including the subcortex, midbrain, olfactory tract, temporal lobe, occipital lobe, and parahippocampal cortex) had slightly warmer (∼0.2°C) baseline temperatures, after cooling, temperatures reached the same level as the non-core regions (35.6 ± 0.2°C), indicating the cooling effectiveness of the CSF-based cooling device. In summary, CSF-based intraventricular cooling reliably reduces temperature in all identified brain regions to levels known to be neuroprotective, while maintaining overall systemic normothermia. Dynamic thermal mapping provides high spatiotemporal temperature measurements that can aid in optimizing selective neuroprotective protocols.

Therapeutic Hypothermia and Neuroprotection in Acute Neurological Disease

Therapeutic hypothermia has consistently been shown to be a robust neuroprotectant in many labs studying different models of neurological disease. Although this therapy has shown great promise, there are still challenges at the clinical level that limit the ability to apply this routinely to each pathological condition. In order to overcome issues involved in hypothermia therapy, understanding of this attractive therapy is needed. We review methodological concerns surrounding therapeutic hypothermia, introduce the current status of therapeutic cooling in various acute brain insults, and review the literature surrounding the many underlying molecular mechanisms of hypothermic neuroprotection. Because recent work has shown that body temperature can be safely lowered using pharmacological approaches, this method may be an especially attractive option for many clinical applications. Since hypothermia can affect multiple aspects of brain pathophysiology, therapeutic hypothermia could also be considered a neuroprotection model in basic research, which would be used to identify potential therapeutic targets. We discuss how research in this area carries the potential to improve outcome from various acute neurological disorders.

Dysregulated Glucose Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target to Reduce Post-traumatic Epilepsy

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of disability worldwide and can lead to post-traumatic epilepsy. Multiple molecular, cellular, and network pathologies occur following injury which may contribute to epileptogenesis. Efforts to identify mechanisms of disease progression and biomarkers which predict clinical outcomes have focused heavily on metabolic changes. Advances in imaging approaches, combined with well-established biochemical methodologies, have revealed a complex landscape of metabolic changes that occur acutely after TBI and then evolve in the days to weeks after. Based on this rich clinical and preclinical data, combined with the success of metabolic therapies like the ketogenic diet in treating epilepsy, interest has grown in determining whether manipulating metabolic activity following TBI may have therapeutic value to prevent post-traumatic epileptogenesis. Here, we focus on changes in glucose utilization and glycolytic activity in the brain following TBI and during seizures. We review relevant literature and outline potential paths forward to utilize glycolytic inhibitors as a disease-modifying therapy for post-traumatic epilepsy.

Statistical analysis plan for the POLAR-RCT: The Prophylactic hypOthermia trial to Lessen trAumatic bRain injury-Randomised Controlled Trial

Background

The Prophylactic hypOthermia to Lessen trAumatic bRain injury-Randomised Controlled Trial (POLAR-RCT) will evaluate whether early and sustained prophylactic hypothermia delivered to patients with severe traumatic brain injury improves patient-centred outcomes.

Methods

The POLAR-RCT is a multicentre, randomised, parallel group, phase III trial of early, prophylactic cooling in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury, conducted in Australia, New Zealand, France, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. A total of 511 patients aged 18–60 years have been enrolled with severe acute traumatic brain injury.

The trial intervention of early and sustained prophylactic hypothermia to 33 °C for 72 h will be compared to standard normothermia maintained at a core temperature of 37 °C.

The primary outcome is the proportion of favourable neurological outcomes, comprising good recovery or moderate disability, observed at six months following randomisation utilising a midpoint dichotomisation of the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). Secondary outcomes, also assessed at six months following randomisation, include the probability of an equal or greater GOSE level, mortality, the proportions of patients with haemorrhage or infection, as well as assessment of quality of life and health economic outcomes. The planned sample size will allow 80% power to detect a 30% relative risk increase from 50% to 65% (equivalent to a 15% absolute risk increase) in favourable neurological outcome at a two-sided alpha of 0.05.

Discussion

Consistent with international guidelines, a detailed and prospective analysis plan has been developed for the POLAR-RCT. This plan specifies the statistical models for evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes, as well as defining covariates for adjusted analyses and methods for exploratory analyses. Application of this statistical analysis plan to the forthcoming POLAR-RCT trial will facilitate unbiased analyses of these important clinical data.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00987688 (first posted 1 October 2009); Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12609000764235. Registered on 3 September 2009.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2610-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently managed in the intensive care unit with a combined medical-surgical approach. Treatment aims to prevent additional brain damage and to optimise conditions for brain recovery. TBI is typically considered and treated as one pathological entity, although in fact it is a syndrome comprising a range of lesions that can require different therapies and physiological goals. Owing to advances in monitoring and imaging, there is now the potential to identify specific mechanisms of brain damage and to better target treatment to individuals or subsets of patients. Targeted treatment is especially relevant for elderly people-who now represent an increasing proportion of patients with TBI-as preinjury comorbidities and their therapies demand tailored management strategies. Progress in monitoring and in understanding pathophysiological mechanisms of TBI could change current management in the intensive care unit, enabling targeted interventions that could ultimately improve outcomes.

Mortality Risk Stratification After Traumatic Brain Injury and Hazard of Death With Titrated Hypothermia in the Eurotherm3235Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objectives:

Hypothermia reduces intracranial hypertension in patients with traumatic brain injury but was associated with harm in the Eurotherm3235Trial. We stratified trial patients by International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in [Traumatic Brain Injury] (IMPACT) extended model sum scores to determine where the balance of risks lay with the intervention.

Design:

The Eurotherm3235Trial was a randomized controlled trial, with standardized and blinded outcome assessment. Patients in the trial were split into risk tertiles by IMPACT extended model sum scores. A proportional hazard analysis for death between randomization and 6 months was performed by intervention and IMPACT extended model sum scores tertiles in both the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol populations of the Eurotherm3235Trial.

Setting:

Forty-seven neurologic critical care units in 18 countries.

Patients:

Adult traumatic brain injury patients admitted to intensive care who had suffered a primary, closed traumatic brain injury; increased intracranial pressure; an initial head injury less than 10 days earlier; a core temperature at least 36°C; and an abnormal brain CT.

Intervention:

Titrated Hypothermia in the range 32-35°C as the primary intervention to reduce raised intracranial pressure.

Measurements and Main Results:

Three hundred eighty-six patients were available for analysis in the intention-to-treat and 257 in the per-protocol population. The proportional hazard analysis (intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations) showed that the treatment effect behaves similarly across all risk stratums. However, there is a trend that indicates that patients in the low-risk group could be at greater risk of suffering harm due to hypothermia.

Conclusions:

Hypothermia as a first line measure to reduce intracranial pressure to less than 20 mm Hg is harmful in patients with a lower severity of injury and no clear benefit exists in patients with more severe injuries.

[Recommendation on temperature management after cardiopulmonary arrest and severe traumatic brain injury in childhood beyond the neonatal period : Statement of the German Society for Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine (GNPI) and the scientific Working Group for Paediatric Anaesthesia (WAKKA) of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (DGAI)]

The available data on the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia in different patient groups are heterogeneous. Although the benefits have been proven for some collectives, recommendations for the use of hypothermia treatment in other groups are based on less robust data and conclusions by analogy. This article gives a review of the current evidence of temperature management in all age groups and based on this state of knowledge, recommends active temperature management with the primary aim of strict normothermia (36-36.5 °C) for 72 hours after cardiopulmonary arrest or severe traumatic brain injury for children beyond the neonatal period.

Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension: application in children

Traumatic brain injury remains prevalent in children, particularly within the adolescent age group. In severe injury, the priority of treatment is to stabilise the patient initially and prevent the evolution of brain swelling and secondary ischaemia using tiers of medical therapy. The final stage of intervention for such patients is a decompressive craniectomy. Here in, we identify the current evidence for performing decompressive crainectomy in children including the results from the RESCUEicp study.